Layout 1 Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic quickly went from a “mys- terious coronavirus” in Wuhan, China to an international emergency (World Health Organization [WHO], 2020). Soon after U.S. President Donald Trump issued a travel ban on March 13, 2020, California became the first state to issue stay-at-home orders (AJMC Staff, 2021). Initially, federal officials told the American people to not wear masks in what is now understood as an effort to protect the supply chain of personal protective equipment for health- care workers (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). That official recommendation, despite public resist- ance from the President himself, changed for everyone to start wearing masks: surgical, cloth, or otherwise. Confusion, miscommunication, and debate regarding the benefits of wearing masks lasted throughout the du- ration of the pandemic (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). During the execution of this project, in May 2022, for example, the primary author traveled through Los Angeles International Airport. At the time, masks were no longer required in transportation facilities or aircraft at the local, state, or federal level; however, the airport had many signs, electronic displays, and other in- Young Latina college students’ perspectives on mask-wearing post lifting of mask mandates Thomas A. Clobes,1 Heather Craig Alonge2 1California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, California; 2Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA ABSTRACT Confusion, miscommunication, and debate regarding the benefits of wearing masks, social distancing, and stay-at-home orders en- sued for much of the COVID-19 pandemic. Without a consistent message from the government, doubt regarding masks’ effectiveness in preventing the spread of COVID-19 became common and led to an anti-masking effort and resistance to COVID-19 protocols. This qualitative study used thematic analysis to understand ex- periences of young Latina college students during the pandemic and how these experiences contributed to their decisions to con- tinue following COVID-19 protocols after the lifting of relevant restrictions. Twenty-two Latina college students were inter- viewed, and interview transcripts were analyzed to identify themes. Four themes emerged: i) disinformation and mistrust, ii) economic impacts, iii) emotional impacts, and iv) maintain- ing health. Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews allowed for a deeper understanding of health-seeking behaviors of Latina college students. Inconsistent messaging from public health of- ficials during the pandemic contributed to confusion and resist- ance to the various mandates among participants—the majority of whom, as of this writing (June 2022), have chosen to continue to wear masks and follow other protocols despite public health and university officials lifting mask mandates. Correspondence: Thomas A. Clobes, California State University Channel Islands, One University Drive, Camarillo, CA 93012, USA. Tel.: 805.665.3765 E-mail: thomas.clobes@csuci.edu Key words: COVID-19; pandemic; masks; mask-wearing behav- iors; Latina. Contributions: TAC devised the conception of this project, worked on the design with HCA, completed the data collection, and drafted and approved the final manuscript. HCA handled design and methodological matters and data analysis. She also contributed sig- nificantly to the draft of the manuscript and provided her approval of this draft. Both authors agree to be held accountable for all as- pects of the work. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Permission to conduct this study was received from the Institutional Review Board at Cal- ifornia State University Channel Islands (IO5612) and appropriate administrative and operational authorities. Consent was treated as an informed, ongoing, and evolving process. Permission to record the session was obtained from each participant. Availability of data and materials: All interviews were de-identified and securely stored. To comply with IRB requirements and protect the confidentiality of the participants, interviews from this study are not being made publicly available. Received: 3 September 2022. Accepted: 23 February 2023. Publisher’s note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. ©Copyright: the Author(s), 2023 Licensee PAGEPress, Italy Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837 doi:10.4081/qrmh.2023.10837 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduc- tion in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. [page 24] [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; volume 7:10837 No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly structions informing travelers that masks were required. Thus, travelers who researched whether a mask was re- quired before arriving at the airport were greeted with conflicting messaging prominently displayed throughout the facility. Inconsistent messaging from public health officials, coupled with a lack of research validating the use of cloth masks, was indicative of the lack of appropriate pandemic planning in the U.S. (Centers for Disease Control and Pre- vention [CDC], 2022a; Contreras, 2020; Howard et al., 2021). Without a consistent message from the govern- ment, doubt regarding mask effectiveness in preventing the spread of COVID-19 became common; an anti-mask- ing effort commenced and spilled over to attitudes toward other pandemic protocols (Howard et al., 2021; Romer & Jamieson, 2020; Utych, 2021). At the beginning of the pandemic, higher education institutions sent their students home, transitioned to vir- tual instruction, and closed their campuses (Davidson Col- lege, 2020; National Conference of State Legislators, 2020). Most colleges and universities hosted nearly all of their classes virtually through the 2020-2021 academic year (Davidson College, 2020). When many students re- turned to in-person instruction on their campuses through- out the country in the Fall of 2021, most were required to comply with vaccination and mask-wearing guidelines or undergo regular COVID-19 testing (The California State University, 2021). Among Latina college students, the pandemic brought additional concerns beyond the transmission of COVID-19 and related protocols. Latino households are more likely to have adults working in farming, an essential industry, leav- ing increased household and childcare responsibilities to Latinas (Covarrubias et al., 2019; Mares, 2020; "The Plight of Essential Workers," 2020; Quandt et al., 2020). Latino families also are more likely to work in restaurants and other service industries—areas that were especially im- pacted by stay-at-home orders during the pandemic (Allan et al., 2016; Fairlie, 2020; Kantamneni, 2020). Additionally, people of Latino descent are more likely to distrust health- care professionals and the healthcare system as a whole (Harrington et al., 2021). These factors contributed to ad- ditional stress and challenges among Latina students’ aca- demic lives (Clobes & Alonge, 2021). By May 2022, more than two years from the begin- ning of the pandemic, many universities and public health entities had lifted their mask mandates (California All, 2022). This project was inspired by the first author’s ob- servations in his undergraduate courses that nearly all non-Latina students immediately stopped wearing masks when the university no longer required it, but most Latina students continued to wear them. Throughout the pandemic, there have been variations in mask-wearing practices among different races and eth- nicities (Davis et al., 2021), but there has not been any qualitative investigation in understanding the health-seek- ing behaviors of young, Latina college students and the reasons behind their choices to follow or not follow COVID protocols. This qualitative study sought to under- stand experiences of young, Latina college students dur- ing the pandemic and how these experiences contributed to their decisions to continue wearing masks, socially dis- tance in public, and avoid group settings after the lifting of relevant restrictions. Materials and Methods Study context This study was conducted at a western state university in May 2022. The university is an officially designated Hispanic Serving Institution with 56% of the population identifying as Hispanic and 66% as female. The university is classified as a small institution with a student population under 6,500. Of the student population, 62% are first-gen- eration college students, and 79% receive financial aid. Study participants A purposive sample of twenty-two Latina students (ages 18 to 30) was interviewed for this study (Davis, et al., 2021). Students in the sample included those who were still wearing masks as well as those who had discon- tinued doing so. Participants were recruited from a variety of undergraduate courses, both lower and upper division, by the first author who requested colleagues to post an an- nouncement about the opportunity in their learning man- agement system. Participants were offered the choice of extra credit in their courses (not to exceed 2.5% of course point total) or a $20 Starbucks gift card for taking part in 60-minute, semi-structured interviews. Study procedures A semi-structured interview approach was used to col- lect the data. Open-ended questions were designed by both authors who have professional healthcare experience (Appendix 1). Interviews were completed and recorded via Zoom by the first author. Open-ended questions were asked of all participants; follow-up questions were also asked, individualized per each respondent’s answers to the predesigned questions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim utilizing Zoom’s close captioning feature and re- viewed by both authors while listening to the recorded in- terviews. The first author also took notes during the interview. Interviews were continued until thematic satu- ration was achieved (Guest et al., 2006). Data analysis Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2012). This process con- sisted of reviewing the transcripts and developing initial [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] [page 25] Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly codes to mark any elements that were relevant to the re- search questions. Codes were refined in an iterative process, involving discussion between both study authors before being grouped into preliminary themes. These themes were then evaluated in light of the original dataset and initial codes, resulting in some themes being altered, amalgamated, or eliminated. Finally, salient themes were named based on relationships and patterns of the codes (Figure 1). To verify the data, the second author conducted the data analysis, and the first author confirmed the thematic findings by reviewing the transcripts, notes, and codes (Lincoln & Guba, 1990). When discrepancy occurred in identification of themes, both authors reviewed the data again until consensus was reached. Ethical considerations Permission to conduct this study was received from the Institutional Review Board at California State Univer- sity Channel Islands (IO5612) and appropriate adminis- trative and operational authorities. Consent was treated as an informed, ongoing, and evolving process. Before the interviews, participants were provided a written informed consent form for the study, and any questions were an- swered before the consent form was electronically signed. Participants were informed that the questions were of a personal nature and could provoke an emotional response; they were notified of their right to discontinue the inter- view at any point if they became uncomfortable. Inter- views were held virtually via Zoom at a time chosen by the participant, and permission to record the session was obtained from each participant. All interviews were de- identified and securely stored. To comply with IRB re- quirements and protect the confidentiality of the participants, interviews from this study are not being made publicly available. Results Socio-demographic information All 22 participants identified their gender as female. Detailed descriptive accounts of interviewees’ beliefs, views, and health behaviors related to COVID-19 were collected, with a focus on eliciting lay, causal explanations for the virus as well as the interviewees’ behaviors in mit- igating or protecting against perceived risks with regard to recommended protocols. Socio-demographic information of the study partici- pants is presented in Appendix 2. As noted above, partic- ipants were all Latina college students. Five participants were employed full-time, 14 were employed part-time, and three were unemployed. The mean household income of respondents who knew their household income (15 out of 23) was $40,000; the cost of living in the university area is 34.9% higher than the national average (Bankrate, 2022). None of the respondents were married. One par- ticipant had children. Most of the participants identified as registered Democrats; two participants said that they were registered Republicans, one who was a registered in- dependent, and one who was not registered to vote. Most participants were Catholic, with two not being religious, one leaning toward Christian, and one identifying as Christian. Each participant was fully vaccinated, which was a requirement to attend the university. At the time of the interviews, 17 of the 22 participants revealed that they continue to wear the masks when in public settings, in- cluding when attending classes on campus. Themes Four themes emerged from the interview results (Fig- ure 1): i) disinformation and mistrust, ii) economic im- pacts, iii) emotional impacts, and iv) maintaining health. Theme 1: Disinformation and mistrust Factors such as government recommendations, public opinion, and inconsistent choices of others around them wearing face masks made participants uncertain about the transmission of COVID-19. This uncertainty influenced participants' decision to continue wearing face masks and practice other disease mitigating measures. One partici- pant explained, I don’t go out. I avoid contact with other people. If I have contact with other people, I take some- thing to wash my hands…. If I buy food, I put on rubbing alcohol…. I’m a little panicked, but I think it’s the best thing I’ve done all this time because, thankfully, none of us have gotten it. Another participant described the impact of conflicting government recommendations on the decision to wear face masks: The country was requiring and educating us to wear face masks and then said we didn’t need to.… I am not sure how bad the disease is because I have not experienced it before, but I am going to keep wearing the mask because I just don’t know how it would be to get sick. These quotes illustrate how decisions to wear facemasks were made based on independent choice and not govern- ment requirements. Distrust of experts including government officials such as Dr. Anthony Fauci from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and other scientists was a cited rea- son for study participants to continue to follow pandemic protocols because motives behind their policies were met with skepticism. This skepticism reflected perceived lack [page 26] [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly of transparency from officials in informing people and a general sense of distrust toward officials due to the down- playing the seriousness of the crisis. One participant dis- cussed her skepticism by sharing, “They tell us we can stop wearing masks, but when I watch the news, they tell us the rates keep going up. Why would we stop wearing the masks with rates going up? Because they say we can?” Some participants felt there was a lack of transparency in providing information about the number of deaths and infections from COVID-19 which led them to shifting their attention and trust to unofficial channels such as friends and less common news sources. As one participant said, “When I watched the news or read articles on social media or talked to friends, I felt all kinds of conflicts in the policies and what I should do.” A general consensus was expressed pertaining to a perceived lack of consistency of published information and various media and informational sources. According to the participants, the lack of an integrated scientific ref- erence led to uncertainty of what to do among the public, lack of consensus among experts, and, thus, information confusion. One participant said “People don’t know where to get information and which information source to trust. The information is confusing from the various ex- perts, so it’s hard to trust anyone.” Despite confusion about what sources to trust, partic- ipants shared stories about staying informed about the pandemic and described relying on federal, state, and local resources, as well as traditional and social media. Some participants shared how they did not know what to do or to believe because they were receiving conflicting information regarding mask wearing, social distancing, and quarantine times. Participants characterized mitiga- tion behaviors and regular testing as their responsibility, since readily available information was conflicting: So you really, really, really have to take this seri- ously. They say “Wear that mask.” If that’s all that’s going to help, then you have to do [it]. You should be concerned and wear your mask no mat- ter what others say. This participant indicated her level of concern about con- tracting the virus and adamance against those choosing not to wear masks. After public health officials stated that masks were no longer required, she did not trust the latest recommendation. Participants believed that invalid information and in- consistency in information-related decisions and infor- mation were indicative of authorities' lack of planning prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. As one participant said, “I feel like the leaders knew about COVID for a long time, but didn’t want to do anything until people really started to get sick.” Confusion regarding health policy- makers’ decision-making process, combined with gov- ernment's different decisions to declare closures, deem which jobs were essential, and testing and quarantine re- quirements were seen as misinformation. From the per- spectives of participants, lack of government foresight and preparedness to guide people, failure to implement preventive measures to mitigate the public’s confusion, and political motives thus continued to spread misinfor- mation. One participant stated, The news and information about the coronavirus unfortunately reached the people very late, the members of the community partially underesti- mated the pandemic, and no training was provided. I didn’t know what to do or how to proceed, so I stayed home and only went out as needed…and al- ways wore a mask. [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] [page 27] Article Figure 1. Thematic map of themes and codes. No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly This participant did not trust that information was being properly communicated, leading to anxiety and hesitancy to interact directly with others. Many participants shared their uncertainty about how COVID variants transmit and why they did not rely solely on media sources and government agencies to guide their decisions on mask wearing, vaccinations, and social dis- tancing. Several participants said that they sought the ad- vice of their medical providers to give them guidance on how to avoid contracting COVID-19. One participant de- scribed her doctor’s evident faith in mask efficacy by say- ing, “I asked my own family doctor what I should do after they lifted mask mandates. She said I should keep wearing the mask.” Other participants shared how they relied on the advice of their medical provider on whether or not to receive the COVID-19 vaccination. One student, for ex- ample, said “I am vaccinated. It was a hard decision, but my doctor said I should.” Theme 2: Economic impacts Stories about serious economic consequences of COVID-19 were common. Participants struggled to keep up with expenses and bills or were worried that their fam- ily members would be financially strained as the pan- demic amplified existing difficulties. Participants shared how they or their parents were out of work for periods of time because of being COVID-19 positive or being ex- posed to someone who was positive, for example, “My dad got COVID and could not work for two weeks. It’s just—pretty much it’s just that everyday struggle just got even more harder.” Another participant said, “If I get COVID, I will have to miss work. I cannot afford not to get paid, so I keep wearing my mask to eliminate my risk of getting sick.” In addition to days missed due to sickness, participants also revealed the economic impacts the pandemic had on their family members resulting from lay-offs, reduced schedules, and job eliminations. Many participants ex- plained that their family members were employed in sec- tors that were not deemed essential or were temporarily suspended during the lockdown, for example: “My mom worked in housekeeping at a hotel. The hotel was really slow, so she wasn’t needed. She was let go. It was really hard for us.” Another participant said, “My dad is a car- penter. He wasn’t getting work during the pandemic, and he couldn’t get unemployment. Luckily, he went back to work eventually, but we were worried.” Concern about missing work was also an influence in getting vaccinated. Many places of employment eventu- ally required their employees to be fully vaccinated as a term of employment, as recalled by one participant: “I am vaccinated because my job requires it. I will have to get a booster, too, even though I don’t want to. But I can’t lose my job.” Another participant stated, “I’ll do whatever it takes for us to stay open and to keep our jobs. Wear a mask. Get vaccinated. Whatever.” Theme 3: Emotional impacts Participants shared their experiences with loss, isola- tion, and illness during the pandemic. “The first impact certainly has been family. I lost my uncle…. When my parents had it, I was scared they were going to die,” noted one participant, while others grieved for family members and friends. Seeing friends and family members not only endure sickness, but also economic hardships, emotionally im- pacted the students and evoked a sense of worry for their loved ones’ health and economic stability. The pandemic also separated family and friends, reducing supportive so- cial groups and communities during a time of crisis, ill- ness, and death. As participants were losing loved ones, restrictions on funeral services and visiting family mem- bers at care facilities were implemented. One participant recalled, “My grandma was sick, but we could not be with her because no visitors were allowed.” Some participants felt unsafe leaving their homes and described uncertainty about who among them had the virus. Leaving home also resulted in high-risk exposures. More- over, participants described risks associated with mask mandates being lifted: “How do I know if someone who isn’t wearing a mask is really vaccinated or not positive with COVID? So, I just wear my mask to be safe.” Many participants revealed they did not leave their home for over one year, and if they did, they only left for essential visits for groceries or to go for exercise outside and alone. Theme 4: Maintaining health Participants stated that they abided by public health and government safety protocols, even after mandates were lifted, to avoid contracting the virus and infecting their family members. Participants typically emphasized their hesitation toward lockdown, owing to the serious economic hardships they would suffer, while also stress- ing the importance of keeping their family members and others around them safe and healthy as the motivating rea- son for wearing a mask. Even after being fully vaccinated, participants did not reject the use of masks, maintaining social distance, and confining at home. As one person sug- gested: “I think people should be willing to live more re- strictive lifestyles, to include wearing masks, until there are less COVID cases, to keep everyone safe and healthy.” Another stated, “You do not know who is asymptomatic. You don't know who is infected and who isn't. If the per- son next to you is asymptomatic, and you don't wear a mask, you may get infected.” Due to concerns for the health of themselves and their family members, most participants supported the idea that individuals should keep wearing masks when out in public for the foreseeable future. When asked when they would stop wearing the masks, 18 of the participants revealed they will continue to wear the mask in the immediate fu- ture, while only five revealed they have stopped wearing [page 28] [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly masks. Of the 18, when asked at what point they would stop wearing the masks, the answers varied from a few months to a couple of years. Follow-up questions regard- ing how they determined the time frame for discontinuing wearing masks suggested that participants had no consis- tent rationale. One participant, for example, explained, “I am not sure why I will stop wearing the mask in six months, but it seems like it would be okay by then.” Discussion This study is the first known qualitative exploration of reasons for whether young college Latinas chose to follow COVID-19 mask-wearing protocols after the lifting of mask mandates. Given the growing Latino population and the slower vaccination rates among this population, having a greater understanding of their pandemic-related health- seeking behaviors can aid public health and college offi- cials in providing better guidance during other similar infectious events (CDC, 2022a, 2022b; Kriss et al., 2022; Passel et al., 2022). Thematic analysis, using in-depth in- terviews, allowed for a phenomenological understanding of the health-seeking behaviors of young Latina college students, whereas previous scholarship focused on quan- titative aspects of mask-wearing behavior (Davis et al., 2021; Howard et al., 2021). Findings of this research reflect grounded effects due to a lack of clarity from public health and other govern- ment officials during the pandemic (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). Participants expressed uncertainty about their safety and the safety of their loved ones, with the sudden lifting of mandates motivating them to wear masks even after being told for nearly two years to wear one (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). Despite the decision to lift the mask mandates and other protocols, the participants still did not feel safe (Cal- fornia All, 2022). Latinos, in general, lack trust in the healthcare system and often have an expectation of being discriminated against in the course of seeking treatment (Jacobs et al., 2011). This lack of trust has led to health disparities in the Latino population. Many Latinos delay treatment or avoid preventive care, contributing to disparities in ailments such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and vaccinations (Harrington et al., 2021; Hong et al., 2018; Mouslim et al., 2020). In fact, though Latinos now have comparable rates of COVID-19 vaccination to their non-Latino white counterparts, they were much slower to receive their first vaccination and to be fully vaccinated (Kriss et al., 2022). Nevertheless, respondents in this research indicated a pro- clivity to wearing masks as a way of avoiding reliance on the healthcare system, suggesting that while Latinas might have been late in receiving vaccines, on one hand, suspi- cions of government and healthcare systems also caused them to wear masks long after mandates were lifted, on the other. Despite some degree of reticence among Latinos gen- erally, participants in this study shared a tendency to con- sult with the individual medical providers on COVID-19 related decisions. This simultaneously occurred while they were experiencing distrust in local, state, and federal public health officials. This inconsistency might have been increased due to participants being college students. Armstrong et al. (2007) determined that being Hispanic was associated with a higher level of distrust in physi- cians, but this distrust lessened with higher levels of edu- cation, thus partially explaining the contradiction reported by the participants. It is worth noting that the university from which this sample was recruited primarily serves first-generation students. As such, participants were active in attaining higher education while primarily residing in a home environment that fosters medical distrust. Consequences of confusing and inconsistent messaging from public health officials throughout the pandemic were revealed in this qualitative exploration (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). Considering the cultural, historical, and economic factors contributing to the existing general mistrust of healthcare professionals among the Latino population in the U.S., distrust and uncertainty ex- hibited by participants were likely exacerbated by the mis- information and inconsistent messaging (Harrington et al., 2021; Hong et al., 2018; Mouslim et al., 2020). The economic impacts of COVID-19 on young Latina college students were formidable because of the nature of the structure of Latino families and the industries many of their family members work in (Allan et al., 2016; Co- varrubias et al., 2019; Fairlie, 2020; Kantamneni, 2020; Mares, 2020; “The plight of essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.,” 2020; Quandt et al., 2020). Hav- ing felt these consequences earlier in the pandemic, par- ticipants in this research were hesitant to stop wearing masks. Furthermore, their motivations included a desire to prevent another round of stay-at-home orders and worksite shutdowns, potentially exacerbating their already tenuous financial situation. Latino families are often more tightly connected than other ethnic groups (Gamoran et al., 2012). This likely contributed to the emotional impacts of the pandemic and, thus, decisions to continue wearing masks. Respondents consistently expressed worry or concern for parents and grandparents, among other family members who had co- morbidities, making them at a particularly high risk of contracting the virus. Continuing mask-wearing seemed to help mitigate the emotional consequences of the pan- demic, acting as both a literal and figurative barrier to COVID-19 and its impacts. The final theme of maintaining health is indicative of the focus on public health, social distancing, mask-wear- ing, and hand hygiene prevalent throughout the pandemic (CDC, 2022a). While participants were unclear about the best way to proceed, given the conflicting information, they perceived their health and the health of their family [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] [page 29] Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly members to be a priority (Jankowicz, 2020; Jingnan et al., 2020; Yan, 2020). Wearing masks, even after the lifting of the mandates, was a way for them to help ensure indi- vidual health and a healthy family. The handling of the pandemic and related policies was highly politicized in the United States (Oberlander, 2020). Thus, the protocols recommended to limit viral transmis- sion were perceived through political lenses (Alberti et al., 2020; Bailey & Moon, 2020). This resulted in confu- sion and distrust among the U.S. public, consistent with the experiences shared by the participants in this study. The need is clear for a less politicized and more system- atic plan for addressing future communicable disease out- breaks (Alberti et al., 2020). Understanding how the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted Latinas and other underrepresented groups can help provide the foundation for establishing this plan. There are some limitations in this research. All of the respondents were recruited from a single university in one western state. As such, the results of this qualitative study may have limited generalizability to Latinas in other re- gions of the country. While all participants were college students, this sample was drawn from a university with a large proportion of first-generation students who are re- ceiving financial aid. These students may have a different perspective than Latinas in general. Additional research on Latinas from more conservativ eother states, for exam- ple, may have different findings. Conclusions Inconsistent messaging from public health officials during the pandemic contributed to confusion and resist- ance of the various mandates. The majority of the Latina college students interviewed for this research chose to continue to wear masks and follow other COVID-19 pro- tocols, despite public health and university officials lifting the mask mandates. These participants expressed disin- formation and mistrust, concern about economic and emo- tional impacts, and maintaining health as themes leading them to continue this health-seeking behavior. References AJMC Staff. A Timeline of COVID-19 Developments in 2020. (2021). American Journal of Managed Care, 1. Alberti, P. M., Lantz, P. M., & Wilkins, C. H. (2020). Equitable pandemic preparedness and rapid response: Lessons from COVID-19 for pandemic health equity. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 921-935. https://doi.org/ 10.1215/03616878-8641469 Allan, B. A., Garriott, P. O., & Keene, C. N. (2016). Outcomes of social class and classism in first-and continuing-genera- tion college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(4), 487. Armstrong, K., Ravenell, K. L., McMurphy, S., & Putt, M. (2007). Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 97(7), 1283-1289. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.080762 Bailey, Z. D., & Moon, J. R. (2020). Racism and the political economy of COVID-19: Will we continue to resurrect the past? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 937- 950. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8641481 Bankrate. (2022). Cost of living comparison calculator. https:// www.bankrate.com/real-estate/cost-of-living-calculator/ Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. California All. (2022). Masks. Retrieved April 22 from https://covid19.ca.gov/masks-and-ppe/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwn- NyUBhCZARIsAI9AYlGybxH7caXEvdU40p-PZwKGVq VkijBEcnXci8aqhkvLVKytx1HVknkaAtswEALw_wcB Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022a). How to pro- tect yourself and others. Retrieved June 2 from https://www. cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/preven- tion.html Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022b). Trends in demographic characteristics of people receiving COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States. Retrieved June 13 from https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demo- graphics-trends Clobes, T. A., & Alonge, H. C. (2021). Instructional support for first-generation Hispanic students during the COVID-19 pan- demic. HETS Online Journal, 12(1), 1b-1b. Contreras, G. W. (2020). Getting ready for the next pandemic COVID-19: Why we need to be more prepared and less scared. Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 87-89. Covarrubias, R., Valle, I., Laiduc, G., & Azmitia, M. (2019). “You never become fully independent”: Family roles and independ- ence in first-generation college students. Journal of Adoles- cent Research, 34(4), 381-410. Davidson College. (2020). The college crisis initiative. . https://collegecrisis.shinyapps.io/dashboard/ Davis, R. E., Sharma, M., Simon, K. E., & Wilkerson, A. H. (2021). Conceptualization of college students’ COVID-19 re- lated mask-wearing behaviors using the Multi-Theory Model of health behavior change. Health Promotion Perspectives, 11(2), 194. Fairlie, R. (2020). The impact of COVID�19 on small business owners: Evidence from the first three months after widespread social�distancing restrictions. Journal of Economics & Man- agement Strategy, 29(4), 727-740. Gamoran, A., Turley, R. N. L., Turner, A., & Fish, R. (2012). Dif- ferences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic families in so- cial capital and child development: First-year findings from an experimental study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 97-112. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturdation and vari- ability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. Harrington, N., Chen, Y., O'Reilly, A. M., & Fang, C. Y. (2021). The role of trust in HPV vaccine uptake among racial and eth- nic minorities in the United States: a narrative review. AIMS Public Health, 8(2), 352. Hong, Y. R., Tauscher, J., & Cardel, M. (2018). Distrust in health care and cultural factors are associated with uptake of col- orectal cancer screening in Hispanic and Asian Americans. Cancer, 124(2), 335-345. Howard, J., Huang, A., Li, Z., Tufekci, Z., Zdimal, V., van der Westhuizen, H.-M., von Delft, A., Price, A., Fridman, L., & [page 30] [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly Tang, L.-H. (2021). An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 118(4), e2014564118. Jacobs, E., Mendenhall, E., Scheck-McAlearney, A., Rolle, I., Whitaker, E., Warnecke, R., & Ferrans, C. (2011). An ex- ploratory study of how trust in health care institutions varies across African American, Hispanic and white populations. Communication and Medicine, 8(1), 89-98. Jankowicz, M. (2020). Fauci said US government held off pro- moting face masks because it knew shortages were so bad that even doctors couldn’t get enough. Business Insider. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/fauci-mask-advice- was-because-doctors-shortages-from-the-start-2020- 6?r=US&IR=T Jingnan, H., Aubrey, A., & Wroth, C. (2020). Should we all be wearing masks in public? Health experts revisit the question. NPR. https://www. npr. org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/ 31/824560471/should-we-all-be-wearing-masks-in-public- health-experts-revisit-the-question. Kantamneni, N. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103439. Kriss, J. L., Hung, M.-C., Srivastav, A., Black, C. L., Lindley, M. C., Lee, J. T., Koppaka, R., Tsai, Y., Lu, P.-J., & Yankey, D. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination coverage, by race and ethnic- ity—National immunization survey adult COVID module, United States, December 2020–November 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 71(23), 757. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1990). Judging the quality of case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183 9900030105 Mares, T. (2020). What a stay-at-home order means for migrant dairy workers. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(3), 585-586. Mouslim, M. C., Johnson, R. M., & Dean, L. T. (2020). Health- care system distrust and the breast cancer continuum of care. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 180(1), 33-44. National Conference of State Legislators. (2020). Higher educa- tion responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Retrieved June 16 from https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/higher-ed- ucation-responses-to-coronavirus-covid-19.aspx#:~:text=The %20Coronavirus%20Aid%2C%20Relief%2C%20and%20E conomic%20Security%20Act%20(CARES,to%20re- spond%20to%20the%20coronavirus Oberlander, J. (2020). Introduction to “COVID-19: Politics, in- equalities, and pandemic”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 905-906. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878- 8641445 Passel, J. S., Lopez, M. H., Cohn, D. (2022). U.S. Hispanic pop- ulation continued its geographic spread in the 2010s. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch. org/fact-tank/2022/02/03/u-s-hispanic-population-continued- its-geographic-spread-in-the-2010s/ Quandt, S. A., LaMonto, N. J., Mora, D. C., Talton, J. W., Lauri- enti, P. J., & Arcury, T. A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic among Latinx farmworker and nonfarmworker families in North Carolina: knowledge, risk perceptions, and preventive behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5786. Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US Soc Sci Med. 2020; 263: 113356. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356. The California State University (2021). California State Univer- sity to implement COVID-19 vaccination requirement for Fall 2021 term. Retrieved June 4 from https://www.calstate. edu/csu-system/news/Pages/California-State-University-to- Implement-COVID-19-Vaccination-Requirement-for-Fall- 2021-Term.aspx The plight of essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2020). Lancet, 395(10237), 1587. Utych, S. M. (2021). Messaging mask wearing during the COVID-19 crisis: Ideological differences. Journal of Exper- imental Political Science, 8(2), 91-101. WHO. (2020). Listings of WHO’s response to COVID-19. Re- trieved June 8 from https://www.who.int/news/item/29-06- 2020-covidtimeline Yan, H. (2020). Want to prevent another shutdown, save 33,000 lives and protect yourself? Wear a face mask, doctors say. CNN. Retrieved June 8 from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/ 25/health/face-mask-guidance-covid-19/index.html [Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare 2023; 7:10837] [page 31] Article Online supplementary material: Appendix 1. Interview questions. Appendix 2. Participant demographic data. Total participants, N=23. No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly