21 HUTH, Christopher & BILLION, Frank. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on German golf – a comparison between club-owned and commercial golf clubs. Quality in Sport. 2022;8(1):21-27. eISSN 2450-3118. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/QS.2021.08.01.002 https://apcz.umk.pl/QS/article/view/40844 The journal has had 20 points in Ministry of Education and Science of Poland parametric evaluation. Annex to the announcement of the Minister of Education and Science of December 21, 2021. No. 32582. Has a Journal's Unique Identifier: 201398. Scientific disciplines assigned: Economics and finance (Field of social sciences); Management and Quality Sciences (Field of social sciences). Punkty Ministerialne z 2019 - aktualny rok 20 punktów. Załącznik do komunikatu Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z dnia 21 grudnia 2021 r. Lp. 32582. Posiada Unikatowy Identyfikator Czasopisma: 201398. Przypisane dyscypliny naukowe: Ekonomia i finanse (Dziedzina nauk społecznych); Nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości (Dziedzina nauk społecznych). © The Authors 2022; This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author (s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non commercial license Share alike. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Received: 14.10.2021. Revised: 19.11.2022. Accepted: 19.11.2022. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on German golf – a comparison between club-owned and commercial golf clubs Christopher Huth Universität der Bundeswehr München Frank Billion Universität der Bundeswehr München Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic turned the international sports world upside down almost overnight. Both professional and popular sports are suffering from the pandemic in equal measure. Sports clubs, which have to bear high fixed costs, are particularly affected. This also includes golf clubs. A primary empirical survey of German golf clubs shows that although the short term – during the lockdown – economic consequences were severe, especially for commercial golf clubs, the 2020 season can be considered successful. This could be an increased interest in exercise in nature and higher health awareness among the population. It is now crucial that golf clubs and associations focus even more intensely on nature (experiences) and health and develop them strategically. Keywords: corona, health, nature, digitization, management Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic turned the international sports world upside down almost overnight. In March 2020, national and international top and popular sport came to a standstill worldwide within a few days, as mass events in particular - such as concerts, religious gatherings or sporting events - contributed to the spread of COVID-19 (Memish et al., 2019). To date, the pandemic has had a noticeable impact on different levels of sport (Parnell, Widdop, Bond, & Wilson, 2020). The result was that many professional sporting events worldwide have either been cancelled or postponed to prevent virus transmission through reduced close contact between spectators or athletes (Clarkson, Culvin, Pope, & Parry, 2020; Toresdahl & Asif, 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/QS.2021.08.01.002 https://apcz.umk.pl/QS/article/view/40844 22 In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, amateur sports clubs have also had to close their sports facilities immediately, in many cases in the middle of the season, to comply with physical distance and shelter restrictions (Doherty, Millar, & Misener, 2020). In Germany, as in other countries or regions of the world, due to the risk of infection, the sports world stood still for several weeks from March 13, 2020, in order to protect society and reduce the infection rate (Ebrahim et al., 2020; Pandey et al., 2014). However, the lockdown had dramatic (economic) consequences. In just Bavaria, a state in southern Germany, the COVID-19-related deficit of sports clubs is over 200 million euros (BLSV, 2020). Sports clubs, which have to bear high fixed costs, are particularly affected. This also includes golf courses, for example. Golf courses are among the most expensive mass sports facilities with high fixed costs for maintenance, so continuous income streams are central to the operation of a golf course (Huth & Kurscheidt, 2019). The maintenance of a golf course (golf course maintenance, building maintenance) usually accounts for more than 50% of the total costs (Billion, 2020a). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, around 50% of commercially operated golf clubs recorded losses (ibid., 2020a). According to initial estimates by Billion (2020b), the officially ordered lockdown has resulted in economic damage averaging around € 1,000 per day for German golf clubs. While the lockdown had almost no impact on membership fees in the short term, the golf clubs, on the other hand, had to make higher organizational and financial expenses in acquiring new members and creating central information about COVID-19 (Huth & Billion, 2020). The sale of vouchers should generate at least (low) current income from the operative business (ibid., 2020). Despite the negative (economic) effects of COVID-19 on sport, initial trends show that sport can also benefit at least in the medium to long term (Weed, 2020). Many people increasingly desire to be "outside" and to be active there beyond their everyday movements. Second, Weed (2020) adds that there is also a growing understanding of the importance of exercising for human well-being on the political side. Golf as a sport that is played in the open air could benefit from the trends outlined. Golf is contactless, and a maximum of four people can play together at one golf hole. On an 18-hole golf course, which often exceeds a total length of 6 km and measures the size of 65 to 100 soccer fields, a maximum of 72 people can play at the same time when fully occupied. This shows that a sport like golf is ideal when the rules of distance are to be followed. It should be noted that the effects of sport on well-being are more significant in natural green spaces than in urban areas (Barton et al., 2016; Weed, 2020). However, the general public often criticises outdoor sports for abusing nature for their purposes (Briassoulis, 2010). However, several organisations have now launched initiatives to make golf more environmentally friendly (Rosenberg, 2018). Environmental certificates have helped golf to improve its image (Huth, 2017). Following Weed's (2020) argument, it should also be noted that proponents of health-related initiatives in golf point to the many benefits that golf can produce for health and well-being (Huth & Breitbarth, 2020). In this context, Sorbie et al. (2020) found that golfers perform significantly better than non-golfers in terms of social trust and personal well-being. The study aims to evaluate how, from the perspective of German golf clubs, the 2020 golf season went from an economic point of view - in the short and medium-term - and what prognosis they have for 2021. In particular, it should also be analyzed (a) to what extent members could be generated and (b) how many rounds of golf were played compared to the previous season. The extent to which initiatives such as the DGV programs “Golf and Nature” and “Golf and Health” and the trend towards digitization bring economic added value will also be investigated. There is always a comparison between commercial and club-owned golf courses. Dickson and Koenigfeld (2018) show that golf clubs pursue different (economic) goals depending on their legal form. 23 Before showing the results, the method is briefly described. The article finally closes with a discussion and an outlook. Method The study follows a direct, primary empirical research design that focuses on German golf clubs. For reasons of time and costs (Li, Pitts, & Quarterman, 2008) – but also reasons of the current circumstances of the pandemic – a standardized online questionnaire was designed for the study. The questionnaire was placed online via the Qualtrics survey tool. Responsible persons (managers, board members) of German golf clubs were questioned. The German golf market comprises a total of 722 golf clubs (Billion, 2020c). All golf clubs in Germany for which the author obtained a functioning electronic address were contacted by e-mail with a request to forward the message either to the manager or to a responsible person. At the club level, only golf clubs with a golf course with at least nine holes were contacted. This criterion excluded golf facilities with, for example, only exercise facilities, such as a driving range or a short course. Approximately two weeks after the first e-mail, the clubs were sent a reminder about the survey. At the beginning of the questionnaire, the golf courses were asked questions about the 2020 season. The focus here was, in particular, on the period from April to September. The golf clubs should answer how many completely new members [MEMBER_NEW] and returners [MEMBER_RET] had played golf before they had to record. In this context, the golf clubs should also indicate which type of membership – e.g. full membership or weekday memberships – have primarily been concluded. In the next step, the golf clubs should indicate how many rounds of golf were played by members and guest players from April to September in 2019 and 2020. This should then be assessed to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic has economically affected the golf clubs in the short term [COVID_LOCKDOWN] – during the lockdown – and in the medium term [COVID_2020] – 2020 season. It should also be assessed to what extent the pandemic will continue to impact golf clubs in 2021 [COVID_2021]. Finally, following the trends outlined by Weed (2020), it should be indicated to what extent the DGV programs "Golf and Nature" [GOLF&NATURE] and "Golf and Health" [GOLF&HEALTH] as well as the topic of digitization [DIGITAL], which is caused by the pandemic has received a real boost in importance in general (Brenner & Fahse, 2020), are essential building blocks for the profitability of golf clubs. At the end of the questionnaire, various data such as the location of the facility [LOCATION], the number of holes [HOLES], the legal form [LEGAL], the age [AGE], the number of members [MEMBERS] and the percentage of full paying payers [FULL_PAYER], asked about the golf clubs themselves. The following table summarizes the variables with their description and scale level. Table 1: Overview variables Regarding the evaluation of the selected items, the participating golf clubs mostly answered questions on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., from 1 = do not agree to 5 = agree). Such scales have been widely used because they best reflect the preferences of participants (Dawes, 2008; Li et al., 2008; Revilla et al., 2014). When analyzing data, both descriptive data and bivariate results are presented. The legal form of golf clubs is considered due to the different goals of commercial golf clubs and club-owned golf courses. It is hypothesized that the economic impact should be more significant for commercial golf clubs than for member-owned clubs, as the former have for- profit intentions (Dickson & Koenigsfeld, 2018). In addition to the general descriptive results, the comparison of mean values ​ ​ and the mean values ​ ​ of the two groups are listed in each table. Participants from 90 golf clubs completed the questionnaire in full. Of the participating golf clubs, almost 55% have the legal form "e.V." (registered association), and 24 60% are located in rural areas. On average, the participating facilities have around 887 members. In addition, almost 62% of club members are full paying members. 75% of the golf clubs have an 18-hole golf course, and 80% are over 20 years old. Overall, the sample reflects the current situation in German golf very precisely (Billion, 2020c). Results The following table summarizes the main results of the study. Table 2: Descriptive and bivariate results Overall, the officially ordered lockdown in spring 2020 tended to hit the golf clubs hard. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic hit the clubs far less economically in the 2020 season than initially feared. This is also underlined by the number of rounds played. Despite the lockdown lasting several weeks, more rounds were completed during the season than in the previous year – this applies to both members and guest players. Several new members could also be welcomed to German golf courses. Commercial clubs, in particular, were successful here. Full memberships were the most common form of membership. There have also been returners, but on average fewer than new members. The facilities are critical of the 2021 season when they fear that the pandemic will continue to impact golf. Finally, it can be seen that the two DGV programs, “Golf and Nature” and “Golf and Health”, contribute little to economic success from the perspective of German golf clubs. The advancing digitization is seen as much more important Discussion and conclusion Overall, golf has benefited from the developments towards nature-loving sports outlined by Weed (2020). Even if the forced break during the lockdown led to the worst fears about the future, the 2020 season could be viewed as successful. On the one hand, this enabled new members to be won, who in most cases even concluded full memberships, which are particularly valuable from the golf course's point of view. On the other hand, the golf clubs were more prevalent than in the previous year. So, there was an urge to exercise and do sports in nature. In this context, it is fascinating that the two programs launched by the German Golf Association, "Golf and Nature" and "Golf and Health", do not create any real economic added value from the perspective of golf clubs. However, there is currently a strong focus on the topic of health in international golf (R&A, 2020). It is essential to work even more intensively on the issues at both the association and club level because both nature (experiences) and health are currently solid social trends that can help golf – with strategically good management. However, Huth and Breitbart (2020) emphasize that non-golfers, mainly, do not associate golf with these topics, so that (persuasive) work still needs to be done here. Future studies should therefore analyze how golf could better and better occupy the subjects of nature and health. Since the topic of digitization received a comparatively high rating compared to the two DGV programs, it should also be determined in this area what a digitization strategy for golf clubs should look like in concrete terms. Literature Barton, J., Bragg, R., Wood, C., & Pretty, J. (2016). Green exercise: Linking nature, health and wellbeing. London: Routledge. Billion, F. (2020a). Der Marktwert von Golfplatzgrundstücken – Kauf bzw. Pacht. GuG, Grundstücksmarkt und Grundstückswert; Zeitschrift für Immobilienwirtschaft, Bodenpolitik und Wertermittlung, 13-18. Billion, F. (2020b). Corona und der deutsche Golfmarkt. Präsentation für den Regionalkreis Südwest des GMVD. Billion, F. (2020c). Golfmarkt Deutschland 2020: Ausgewählte Daten und Fakten. Sommerfeld: Edewecht. 25 BLSV (2020). Schäden von mehr als 200 Millionen Euro. Eingesehen unter: https://www.blsv.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Pressemitteilung/270320_PM_BLSV_ Zwischenbilanz_Meldesystem.pdf. Brenner, W. & Fahse, T. (2020). Digitalisierung und der Lockdown: Eine Situationsanalyse im Juni 2020. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität St.Gallen, 2020. Eingesehen unter: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/260499/ Briassoulis, B. (2010). “Sorry golfers, this is not your spot!”: Exploring public opposition to golf development. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 34, 288 – 311. doi:10.1177/0193723510377314 Clarkson, B., Culvin, A., Pope, S., & Parry, K. (2020), Covid-19: Reflections on threat and uncertainty for the future of elite women’s football in England. Managing Sport and Leisure, DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1766377 Dickson, G., & Koenigsfeld, J. (2018). Golf club management and hospitality. In T. Breitbarth, S. Kaiser-Jovy, & G. Dickson (Eds.), Golf Business and Management: A Global Introduction (pp. 53-67), New York: Routledge. Doherty, A., Millar, P., & Misener, K. (2020): Return to community sport: leaning on evidence in turbulent times. Managing Sport and Leisure, DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1794940 Ebrahim, S. H., Ahmed, Q. A., Gozzer, E., Schlagenhauf, P., & Memish, Z. A. (2020). Covid- 19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic. BMJ, 368, m1066. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1066 Huth, C. (2017). Evaluation of the Golf&Natur Environmental Certificate from an Ecological- Economic Perspective. International Journal of Golf Science, 6, 142-158. Huth, C. & Billion, F. (2020). Forschungsreport – COVID-19 Lockdown: Auswirkungen und Aktionen deutscher Golfanlagen. SCIAMUS – Sport und Management, 1, 46-51. Huth, C. & Breitbarth, T. (2020). Golf’s current image and its future role as a health sport from (non-)golfers’ perspectives. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, DOI: 10.1007/s12662-020-00653-y Huth, C. & Kurscheidt, M. (2019). Membership versus green fee pricing for golf courses: the impact of market and golf club determinants. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19, 331-352, DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2018.1527380 Li, M., Pitts, B., & Quarterman, J. (2008). Research Methods in Sport Management. Morgantown: FIT. Memish, Z. A., Steffen, R., White, P., Dar, O., Azhar, E. I., Sharma, A., & Zumla, A. (2019). Mass gatherings medicine: Public health issues arising from mass gathering religious and sporting events. The Lancet, 393(10185), 2073–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(19)30501-X Pandey, A., Atkins, K. E., Medlock, J., Wenzel, N., Townsend, J. P., Childs, J. E., Nyenswah, T. G., Ndeffo-Mbah, M. L., & Galvani, A. P. (2014). Strategies for containing Ebola in West Africa. Science, 346(6212), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260612 Parnell, D., Widdop, P., Bond, A., & Wilson, R. (2020). COVID-19, networks and sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1750100 R&A (2020). Golf and Health. Retrieved from: https://www.randa.org/en/theranda/initiatives/golfandhealth Revilla, M., Saris, W., & Krosnick, J. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree– disagree scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73-97. Rosenberg, D. (2018). Ethical foundations for sustainability in sport. In B. McCullough & T. Kellison (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sport and the Environment (pp. 54–64). London & New York: Routledge. 26 Sorbie, G., Richardson, A. K., Glen, J., Hardie, S., Taliep, S., Wade, M., Broughton, L., Mann, S., Steele, J., & Lavallee, D. (2020). The association of golf participation with health and wellbeing: A comparative study. International Journal of Golf Science. Toresdahl, B., & Asif, I. (2020). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Considerations for the Competitive Athlete. Sports Health, 12(3), 221-224. Webb, T. (2020): The future of officiating: analysing the impact of COVID-19 on referees in world football, Soccer & Society, DOI: 10.1080/14660970.2020.1768634 Weed, M. (2020): The role of the interface of sport and tourism in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sport & Tourism, DOI:10.1080/14775085.2020.1794351 TABLES Table 1: Variable Description Skale level Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic COVID_LOCKDOWN Short-term effects from lockdown (5-point Likert-scale) ordinal COVID_2020 Medium term effects season 2020 (5-point Likert-scale) ordinal COVID_2021 Future effects season 2021 (5-point Likert scale) ordinal New members and returners MEMBER_NEW Number of new members (0 to 10; 11 to 20; 21 to 30; 31 to 40; 41 to 50, more than 50) ordinal MEMBER_RET Number of returners (0 to 10; 11 to 20; 21 to 30; 31 to 40; 41 to 50, more than 50) ordinal Number of played rounds MROUNDS_19 Number of played member-rounds (season 2019) metric GROUNDS_19 Number of played guest-rounds (season 2019) metric MROUNDS_20 Number of played member-rounds (season 2020) metric GROUNDS_20 Number of played guest-rounds (season 2020) metric Fields for profitability of golf courses GOLF&NATURE DGV-program “Golf and Nature” (5-point Likert-scale) ordinal GOLF&HEALTH DGV-program “Golf and Health“ (5-point Likert-scale) ordinal DIGITAL Digital offers of golf courses (5-point Likert-scale) ordinal Information on the golf courses LOCATION Location of the golf course Anlage (1 = rural; 0 = city) nominal LEGAL Legal form of the golf course (1 = non commerical; 0 = commerical) nominal AGE Age of golf club (younger than 10; 11 to 20; 21 to 30; more than 30) ordinal HOLES Number of golf holes (9 holes; 18 holes; 27 holes; more than 27 holes) ordinal MEMBERS Number of members metric FULL_PAYER Proportion of full paying members metric Table 2: Mean value Standard deviation Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum Mean value non- commercial Mean value commercial COVID_LOCKDOWN 3.53 0.97 0.6268 3.49 3.63 COVID_2020 2.39 0.91 0.7047 2.43 2.36 COVID_2021 3.67 1.17 0.4059 3.78 3.50 MEMBER_NEW 3.92 1.74 0.0977 3.63 4.16 MEMBER_RET 1.97 1.39 0.2740 1.85 2.15 MROUNDS_19 11,480.69 5,182.64 0.4003 10,867.79 12,113.87 GROUNDS_19 4,149.17 3,376.96 0.9113 3,934.07 4,323.13 MROUNDS_20 12,415.02 5,102.30 0.6892 12,101.12 12,760.59 GROUNDS_20 4,495.59 3,348.31 0.3529 4.829.7 4,095.12 27 GOLF&NATURE 2.49 1.28 0.3396 2.59 2.37 GOLF&HEALTH 2.71 1.21 0.0392 2.94 2.44 DIGITAL 3.59 1.14 0.4223 3.49 3.70