R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 105 www.r-economy.ru Online ISSN 2412-0731 Original Paper doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 The Danube inland waterway transport and its role in Serbia’s economic development Jelena Milanković Jovanov , Dragoslav Pavić, Jasmina Đorđević, Aleksandra Dragin, Smiljana Đukičin Vučković, Minucsér Mészáros University of Novi Sad; Novi Sad, Serbia; e-mail: milankovicjovanov@gmail.com ABSTRACT Th e Danube river waterway, i.e. the Pan-European Corridor VII, is considered as one of the most signifi cant transport corridors in Eu- rope. It runs through ten countries, including Serbia (the Serbian part of the river is 588 km long), which is why it is one of Serbia’s priorities to develop inland water transport. Th e system of waterways provides a viable alternative to roads and rail systems. Moreover, it is crucial for regional development. Th e Danube River off ers excellent opportunities for freight, passenger and tourist inland water transportation. Howev- er, the navigability potential of the Danube River still remains largely underrealized in Serbia: despite the high quality of waterways, inland water transport accounts for only 4.7% of the total transport. Th is pa- per deals with the advantages of inland navigation and the major char- acteristics of the Danube waterway in Serbia. In Serbia, the Danube is mainly used for freight and passenger transportation and for the devel- opment of nautical tourism. Th ere are a number of important projects that are currently being implemented in Serbia, such as the construc- tion of new port facilities and marinas. Th e paper also discusses the negative factors impeding regional development in the sphere of wa- terways and water transport in Serbia, primarily the lack of funding for maintenance and improvement of the river’s navigability. KEYWORDS Danube, inland waterway, Serbia, transport, sustainable regional development, tourism ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Th is research was supported by the Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development, ECAP Vojvodina (Project 114-451-2465/2018-02). Th is paper is based on PhD thesis Danube as a Transport Artery and Axis of Development in the Republic of Serbia defended by Jelena Milanković Jovanov at the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management in 2015 and PhD thesis Cruising Along the Corridor VII and Nautical Tourism in Serbia defended by Aleksandra Dragin at the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management in 2008. FOR CITATION Milanković Jovanov J., Pavić D., Đorđević J., Dragin A., Đukičin Vučković S., & Mészá- ros, M. (2018) Th e Danube inland waterway transport and its role in Serbia’s economic development. R-economy, 4(3), 105–114. doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Дунайский национальный водный транспорт и его роль в экономическом развитии Сербии Е. Миланкович , Д. Павич, Ж. Джордевич, А. Драгин, С. Джукичин Вучкович, М. Месарош Нови-Садский университет, Нови-Сад, Сербия; e-mail: milankovicjovanov@gmail.com РЕЗЮМЕ Дунайский водный путь, т. е. Паневропейский коридор VII, считает- ся одним из самых значительных транспортных коридоров в Европе. Он проходит через десять стран, включая Сербию (сербская часть реки составляет 588 км), и поэтому является одним из приорите- тов Сербии по развитию внутреннего водного транспорта. Система водных путей является жизнеспособной альтернативой дорожным и железнодорожным системам. Более того, это важно для региональ- ного развития. Река Дунай предлагает прекрасные возможности для грузовых, пассажирских и туристических внутренних водных пе- ревозок. Однако потенциал судоходства в реке Дунай по-прежнему реализован в Сербии не полностью: несмотря на высокое качество водных путей, внутренний водный транспорт составляет лишь 4,7% от общего объема перевозок. В этом документе рассматриваются преимущества внутреннего судоходства и основные характеристики водного пути Дуная в Сербии. В Сербии Дунай в основном использу- ется для грузовых и пассажирских перевозок и для развития водного туризма. В настоящее время в Сербии реализуется ряд важных про- ектов, таких как строительство новых портовых сооружений и при- станей для яхт. В статье также обсуждаются негативные факторы, препятствующие региональному развитию в сфере водных путей и водного транспорта в Сербии, в первую очередь отсутствие финан- сирования для поддержания и улучшения судоходства реки. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА Дунай, внутренний водный путь, Сербия, транспорт, устойчивое региональное развитие, туризм БЛАГОДАРНОСТИ Исследование поддержано провинциаль- ным секретариатом по науке и технологи- ческому развитию, ECAP Vojvodina (проект 114-451-2465 / 2018-02). Статья основана на кандидатских диссертациях, защищенных на кафедре географии, туризма и гостиничного менеджмента Е. Миланкович Йованов «Дунай как транспортная артерия и ось развития в Республике Сербия» в 2015 г. и А. Драгиной «Крейсерская по коридору VII и Морской туризм в Сербии» в 2008 г. ДЛЯ ЦИТИРОВАНИЯ Milanković Jovanov J., Pavić D., Đorđević J., Dragin A., Đukičin Vučković S., & Mészá- ros, M. (2018) Th e Danube inland waterway transport and its role in Serbia’s economic development. R-economy, 4(3), 105–114. doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 106 www.r-economy.ru R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Online ISSN 2412-0731 Introduction Th e Danube River has always played a signif- icant role in human geography, serving men as a pathway in migration, trade, and war. Nowadays the Danube is a popular transport route connect- ing Central and Eastern Europe. Th e river fl ows through the regions of intensive industrial and agricultural production, densely populated areas with substantial development potential. Prior to the construction of the Suez Canal, the role of the Danube had been extremely important due to the fact that the shortest route connecting Europe and Asia went through the Black Sea. Over sixty of the Danube’s tributaries are navigable, which contrib- utes to the transportation importance of the riv- er. Th e role of the Danube was enhanced by the construction of the Main-Danube canal, which connects the Northern Sea and the Black Sea and creates a 3,500 km waterway [1]. Th e Republic of Serbia lies at the crossroads of the most important Pan-European traffi c routes, such as the road and railway Corridor X and water- way Corridor VII (the Danube navigable corridor), which has a great signifi cance for the country as it links north and south, east and west. Th e Danube with the total length of 1,600 km is the backbone of inland waterways in Serbia [2]. In addition, there are the Danube’s large tributaries, the Tisza and the Sava Rivers, and the navigable canals within the hy- drosystem Danube-Tisza-Danube. All these navi- gable routes are connected to the Danube River and are a part of the Trans-European Corridor VII waterway from Rotterdam to Sulina. High population density also refl ects the impor- tance of the Upper Danube Basin in Serbia. Th e total population in municipalities located near the Dan- ube River is 2,013,646 people or 28.8% of the total population of Serbia. Population density in this area is 150 inhabitants per km², which is twice as many as the country’s average (80.5 inhabitants per km²)1. Th e Danube River is crucial for the develop- ment of trade, services and tourism in Serbia [2; 3]. Th e Serbian part of the Danube is navigable and is actively used for freight transportation. Th e level of the river traffi c varies from country to country and depends on the political and economic situation. Po- litical stability and closer economic ties have had a positive impact on the development of the transport system in former Yugoslav republics such as Serbia and Croatia. For instance, there has been a tenfold 1 Republic Statistical Offi ce. 2012. Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Serbia, 2011, Vol. 2, Age and Gender, data by settlements, Belgrade. increase in freight traffi c on the Danube as com- pared to twenty years ago. Yet, the transport capacity of the river is still underused, especially we if com- pare it to that of the Rhine, which is ten times higher2 [4]. In the Serbian part of the Danube, the lack of in- vestment into the maintenance of waterways and the lack of careful planning has led to deterioration of river and canal navigation in such spheres as freight and passenger transportation and nautical tourism. Inland Navigation through the Danube Waterway in Europe and Serbia Th e Danube has a great signifi cance for all the countries which it fl ows through: Germany (14.54%), Austria (8.82%), Slovakia (4.34%), Hun- gary (10.49%), Croatia (3.47%), Serbia (14.82%), Romania (27.1%), Bulgaria (11.87%), Moldova (0.01%) and Ukraine (4.54%). 1,070.9 km of the river (or 37% of its total length) are state borders. Four countries: Croatia, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine are positioned on only one riverbank3. Th ere are numerous ways to use the Danube River for freight transport, hydropower gener- ation, industrial and residential water supplies, irrigation, and fi shing. Navigation and freight transport play the greatest role in economic de- velopment, especially aft er the construction of the canals such as the Danube-Black Sea Canal and the Main-Danube Canal. Th e water of the Danube is used in industry, but also in agriculture, espe- cially for irrigation4. River transport has a number of advantages such as cost eff ectiveness and prof- itability: as Jean Pierre Rissoan (1994) said, “riv- er-sea transport pollutes less and can also provide an alternative to congested roads and railways. Door-to-door journeys by river-sea transport seem destined for future growth” [5]. According to the Economic Commission for Europe (1996; 2011), some of the advantages of inland waterway transportation include cost eff ectiveness; the low- est propulsion energy consumption; navigation safety; reduced pollution, and so on5. 2 Danube Navigation Statistic for 2009–2010; Encyclope- dia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/ 3 Danube Commission. Retrieved from http://www.danu- becommission.org/ 4 Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www. britannica.com/ 5 Th e White Paper on Trends in and Development of In- land Navigation and its Infrastructure. Retrieved from www. unece.org/trans/doc/fi naldocs/sc3/TRANS-SC3-138e.pdf; Th e White Paper on Effi cient and Sustainable Inland Water Trans- port in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fi lead- min/DAM/trans/main/sc3/publications/WhitePaper_Inland_ Water_Transport_2011e.pdf R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 107 www.r-economy.ru Online ISSN 2412-0731 Th e Serbian part of the Danube is a typical lowland river 400–1,200 m wide, approximately 19 m deep with the water speed of 3.5–4.0 km/h. Prior to the building of the hydroelectric power plant and navigation system Djerdap, the Danube had had the characteristics of a mountain river (approximate speed of 18 km/h) in Djerdap sec- tor. Th e construction of the above-mentioned sys- tem signifi cantly reduced the river’s speed to only 0.3 m/s or 1.1 km/h. Th e Danube is the most important element of the inland waterway system in Serbia. With the Sava and the Tisa rivers, it creates a network of waterways 1,680 km long [2]. Serbia was one of the seven countries that es- tablished the Danube Commission in 1948, thus accepting the obligation to maintain and improve navigation conditions of the river. One of the most signifi cant recommendations of the Danube Com- mission is to assure the minimum depths of 2.5 m and fairway widths of 180 m at low water levels. Th e Danube’s section in Serbia (588 km) is navigable for all types of river ships; it may be di- vided into four sectors, corresponding to two wa- terway classes (European Conference of Ministers of Transport, 1992)6: – the sector between the Hungarian border (km 1433 + 000) and Belgrade (km 1166 + 000) has hydrologic and hydraulic regime characteristics; – the sector between Belgrade (km 1166 + 000) and the dam Djerdap I (km 942 + 000) is slowly moving canalled water and corresponds to the waterway class VII; – the sector between the dam Djerdap I (km 942 + 000) and Djerdap II (km 863 + 550) was also canalled corresponding to the highest water- way class VII; – downstream the dam Djerdap II (km 863 + 550) up to the Bulgarian border (km 845 + 000), the Danube’s course is regulated by various con- structions. Th e maximum vessel dimensions are similar to those in the upstream sectors. However, 6 European Conference of Ministers of Transport (1992). Resolution No. 92/2 on New Classifi cation of Inland Waterways (report). Retrieved from http://www.internationaltransportfo- rum.org/IntOrg/acquis/wat19922e.pdf Figure 1. Th e Danube River in Serbia (Corridor VII) Source: Base map source (Global map V2). Retrieved from http://www.iscgm.org/gmd/ 108 www.r-economy.ru R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Online ISSN 2412-0731 there is a serious threat for the navigation as there are about 200 sunken WWII ships, some of them still loaded with explosive substances, which also endangers VIb waterway class in this sector. Fleet According to the Danube Navigation Statis- tics, from 1962 (3,142 vessels) to 1990 (5,754 ves- sels), the fl eet size grew steadily. In 2000, there was a considerable decrease in the number of vessels. Aft erwards, the number of vessels fl uctuated in- signifi cantly (Figure 2). However, despite the fl uc- tuations, there was a general upward trend in the number of vessels from 1962 to 2013; the ships’ loading capacity increased as well. 2015 2014 2013 2009 2005 2000 1990 1980 1970 1962 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Figure 2. Th e total number of vessels of the Danube countries (1962–2015) Source: Danube Navigation Statistics for 2009–2010, 2012–2013, 2014–2015 Most vessels in the Danube fl eet are used in Germany, Austria, Romania and Ukraine. Th e number of vessels in Serbia, Croatia and Molda- via is 5% lower than the total number of vessels on the Danube. Regarding the tonnage of ships on the Dan- ube, Romania ranks fi rst with its share of 40%, then follows Ukraine with 21%, Serbia with 13%, whereas Croatia and Moldova have the smallest shares, 2.5% and 1% respectively7. Th e priority areas for the development of the Danube fl eet are as follows8: modernisa- 7 European Conference of Ministers of Transport (1992) Resolution No. 92/2 on New Classifi cation of Inland Waterways (report). Retrieved from http://www.internationaltransport- forum.org/IntOrg/acquis/wat19922e.pdf; Inventory of Data on the Strategic Inland Waterway Projects. 2011. PLATINA. Retrieved from http://www.naiades.info/repository/public/ article_downloads/file/422_d5-5_24-03-2011_(final_web_ version).pdf 8 Th e White Paper on Effi cient and Sustainable Inland Wa- ter Transport in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/ fi leadmin/DAM/trans/main/sc3/publications/WhitePaper_In- land_Water_Transport_2011e.pdf tion of the fl eet; introduction of new logistics systems; implementation of the River Informa- tion Services and introduction of new transport technologies. Table 1 Fleet, its structure and main types of vessels in Serbia in 2015  Indicator Mo- tori- zed vessels Tugs Pu- sher ves- sels Towed barges Pushed barges Total Number of units 97 94 65   228 180 664 Total po- wer (kW) 37,929 24,768 55,388 – – 118,085 Total carrying capacity (t) 88,066 – – 294,001 169,101 551,168 Source: Danube Navigation Statistics for 2014–2015. According to the Danube Navigation Statis- tics for 2014 and 2015, the total carrying capacity of vessels in Serbia is 551,168 tonnes, whereas the total power is 118,085 kW. Port infrastructure According to the Danube Commission data, there are 91 commercial ports on the Danube River and its tributaries, out of which 11 ports are situated in Serbia. Th ere are 8 international ports in the Serbian sector of the Danube: Apa- tin, Bezdan, Bačka Palanka, Novi Sad, Beograd, Pančevo, Smederevo and Prahovo, the remaining three national ports are Titel, Veliko Gradište and Kladovo. According to the Danube Navigation Statistics for 2014–2015, the port Pančevo is one of the largest ports on the Danube, belonging to the group of ports with the annual cargo turnover of more than 1 million tonnes (Figure 3). Ports in Serbia have signifi cant capacity but they are also technologically outdated, due to the lack of fi nancial support for their maintenance and development. Th e usage of port capacities reach- es only 30% on average due to the lack of tran- shipment goods. Low capacity utilisation occurs for several reasons, such as the outdated technical equipment in ports; fl awed systems for combined and intermodal transport; and declining industri- al production in Serbia. Th e development of inter- modal transport and the promotion of combined transport are crucial for future development of transport in Europe [6]. Most ports in Serbia are connected to the main rail and road traffi c routes in the country. Only the ports in Pančevo and R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 109 www.r-economy.ru Online ISSN 2412-0731 Belgrade have container terminals and none of the ports have Ro-Ro terminals, which is a seri- ous drawback. Ro-Ro transport and Ro-Ro ter- minals could be used not only for domestic lorry carriers, but also for foreign ones (from Turkey, Bulgaria, and Macedonia), which would make it possible to transport lorries by ship and thus cut transportation costs. Th e project for constructing multimodal facilities in port Dunav in Pančevo is already well under way. Th is project has turned out to be successful as it requires minimum in- vestment (primary infrastructure, ground prepa- ration)9. In addition to commercial ports, in line with the latest trends in nautical tourism, a new marina has recently been built in Apatin, which is the fi rst international marina on the Danube in Serbia, out of the seventeen planned, and it off ers berths for 400 (120 for large yachts) vessels and dry-docking covering the area of 2,500 m². The Development of Freight and Passenger Transportation and Nautical Tourism in Serbia Until the mid-twentieth century, the Danube waterway in Serbia was primarily used for trans- 9 Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2007–2012 (2005). Government of Republic of Serbia, Belgrade. portation of passengers and goods. Th e develop- ment of road and railway transport somewhat reduced the passenger traffi c on the Danube, al- though this trend was partially compensated for by diff erent forms of nautical tourism. Nowadays, this waterway is mostly used for transportation of goods and tourism. Heavy load transport Despite the favourable conditions for the operation of inland waterway transport in Serbia, there are a number of impediments to its development such as the bad infrastruc- ture. The most important ports are Belgrade, Pančevo, Smedervo and Prahovo and they en- joy a very good connection with surface roads. Ports Belgrade and Pančevo have container ter- minals. According to the Statistical Offi ce of the Re- public of Serbia, the tonnage carried via the Ser- bian part of the Danube abruptly decreased aft er 1990. Th e period of decline coincided with the period of political instability and economic reces- sion in the country. Aft erwards, there was a pe- riod of growth, which reached its peak in 2005. Since then, there has been a decline and this indi- cator’s values have never got back to the 2005 level (Figure 4). Regensburg (DE) Vienna (AT) Budapest (HU) Pančevo (PS) Oriahova (BG) Svishtov (BG) Tulcea (RO) Galaţi (RO) Izmail (UA) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2015 2014 2013 Figure 3. Major ports on the Danube with cargo turnover of more than 1 mln.t (2013; 2014; 2015) Source: Danube Navigation Statistics for 2012–2013 and 2014–2015 110 www.r-economy.ru R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Online ISSN 2412-0731 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 20 10 20 11 20 12 20 13 20 14 20 15 Figure 4. Th e total tonnage carried on the Danube in Serbia in 1995–2015 (thousands of tons) Source: Statistical Offi ce of the Republic of Serbia. Transport, Storage and Connections Bulletin 2004, 2010 and 2016 Out of the total tonne-kilometres handled in inland waterways in Serbia, the Danube ac- counts for 97%. Inland traffi c makes up over 50% of goods turnover; transit only has a small share, while the transport of goods between foreign ports is almost negligent (see Figure 5). Th e goods transported via the Danube are very diverse: iron ore (25.6%); processed and un- processed metals (22.7%); coal (9.1%); oil and oil derivatives (8.5%); cement (7.5%); grain goods (6%); processed metals of metal industry (5.4%); wood (4.3%); coloured metals ores (3%); fi nished metal products (2.7%); and agricultural goods such as fodder (1.6%) [7]. Th e Inventory of Data on the Strategic Inland Waterway Projects (2011)10 10 Inventory of Data on the Strategic Inland Waterway Projects. 2011. PLATINA. Retrieved from http://www.naiades. info/repository/public/article_downloads/fi le/422_d5-5_24- 03-2011_(fi nal_web_version).pdf demonstrates that the transportation of agricul- tural, industrial, chemical and metal products will continue to grow due to the improvement in the infrastructure between Budapest and Belgrade, between Romania and Bulgaria and in the area of Vienna. Th e increase is to be expected in East Eu- rope, including Serbia. Passenger transport Th e Danube holds a lot of potential as a waterway for passenger transport. Th is poten- tial, however, is largely underused, as only a few countries in the Danube region have strategies for water transport development. According to the data of the Danube Commission, the highest number of registered passenger ships was record- ed in Hungary, Germany, Ukraine and Romania in 2010. Th ese are also the leading countries in terms of domestic passenger-kilometres, where- as the largest number of international passengers is recorded in Ukraine and Germany. Further- more, according to the Danube Commission, the total passenger kilometres on the Danube in all countries is 21,047 km in national transport and 22,404 km in international transport11. Domestic passenger transport virtually does not exist in Serbia and is mostly tourism-orient- ed. About seventy years ago, passenger ships were travelling along the Danube not only from Novi Sad to Sremska Kamenica, but also to Vienna, Re- gensburg and Constanca. Hydrowing ships were running regularly between Belgrade and Novi Sad thirty years ago. At that time, passenger ships 11 Danube Commission. Retrieved from http://www.dan- ubecommission.org/ 2015 2013 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Inland tra�c Export Import Transit Among foreign ports Figure 5. Share of goods transported through the Danube waterway in Serbia between 1995 and 2015, % R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 111 www.r-economy.ru Online ISSN 2412-0731 were operating on the Tisza River, too. Small ships ran from Novi Sad to Bečej several times a day (on the Danube from Novi Sad to the mouth of the Tisa, then on the Tisa to Bečej), and three times per week from Belgrade to Senta (on the Danube from Belgrade to the mouth of the Tisa, then on the Tisa to Senta). Th ere have been attempts to revive this form of transport lately. For instance, the water taxi is very popular in Budapest (Hungary): it runs at the speed of 50 km/h and transports passengers from southern districts to the centre and to the north of the city. Similarly, there is daily transport service between Regensburg, Deggendorf, Passau, Linz and Vienna12. Nautical tourism Nautical tourism has been developing world- wide due to the boom of cruise industry in the last four decades. Th e main forms of nautical tourism include individual navigation of vessel owners, boat charter (renting of ships and sailboats) and river cruises (international tourist cruises). Ac- cording to the Strategy of Tourism Development in the Republic of Serbia13, nautical tourism in Ser- bia uses the strategic potential of the Danube, the leading river cruising destination in Europe. Fur- thermore, according to the same source, the main spheres for the development of nautical tourism in the country are individual navigation (this seg- ment is mostly based on local demand); charter (this segment requires the appropriate infrastruc- ture and is underdeveloped at the moment); and river cruising (this segment is very popular and is enjoying explosive growth). As for individual cruises on the Danube, most of the vessels currently in use are old and the equipment is outdated, which explains the low demand for ship berths in marinas. Th e current number of vessels used for recreational purposes on the Danube in Serbia is negligible (for exam- ple, in Apatin it is less than ten vessels a year). It is expected that old vessels will soon be replaced by new ones and that the number of vessels will be increasing together with the development of nautical tourism in Serbia. It has been estimated that the demand for ship berths in marinas on the Danube (domestic vessels) is unlikely to in- crease by more than 20% in the following years. 12 Donauschiff ahrt WURM+KOECK. Retrieved from http://www.donauschiff ahrt.de/en/ 13 Strategy of Tourism Development of the Republic of Ser- bia for the Period 2015–2025 (2015). Ministry of Traffi c, Tour- ism and Telecommunications, Belgrade. Th e well-equipped nautical route on the Danube and the excellent off er of marinas and other tour- ist products in Serbia are expected to attract ap- proximately 30% of the estimated number of ves- sels to marinas annually. According to the study of marina network in Vojvodina Region, the total number of vessels using marinas is likely to reach 4,100. Moreover, it is expected that Vojvodina (16 of 28 municipalities on the Danube in Serbia) would need about 500 berths for foreign vessels in marinas on the Danube by 2025. Th e Serbian sector of the Danube has been suff ering from the lack of investment. Until re- cently, there have not been any marinas, i.e. the nautical tourism infrastructure still leaves much to be desired. Th is problem could be addressed through the reconstruction of the existing piers and ship berths, which could be converted into marinas. A case to illustrate this solution is the marina in Apatin opened in 2009, which is the only Serbian marina on the Danube. Lately, more investment has been made in pier reconstruction in Belgrade and Novi Sad14 [8]. Cruise industry, which has been growing dy- namically, has a powerful impact on the world economy. Cruises generate over 450,000 jobs with total salaries of about 15 billion US dollars. In 1998, the World Tourist Organisation described fi ve types of tourism types that would be in most demand in the next two decades: tourist cruises, cultural tourism, event-based tourism, eco-tour- ism and thematic tourism. Th e highest increase in tourism cruises demand is expected in the Dan- ube region countries: Hungary, Romania, Slova- kia, Croatia, and Serbia. Th e target markets are the USA, Germany, France, Great Britain, and Austria. Serbia holds considerable potential for the development of nautical tourism that needs to be realized [3]. Th is fact has been confi rmed by the constant increase in the number of cruise ships arriving in Belgrade and other ports in Serbia (Figure 6). According to the data of the Danube Tourist Commission, over 10,000 tourists cruised along the lower Danube15 and about 119,000, along the middle and upper Danube in 2002. By October 2004, over 22,000 tourists from cruise ships visited Novi Sad, over 43,000 Belgrade, and 14 Hadžić, O. (2005). Th e Growth of the Cruise Tourism as a Chance for Repositioning Serbia on Tourism Market. (Paper presented at the meeting of University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, Novi Sad). 15 Danube Tourist Commission. Retrieved from http:// www.danube-river.org 112 www.r-economy.ru R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Online ISSN 2412-0731 over 60,000, the Danube Delta. In 2004, the turn- over on the Danube was 150,000 tourists. Th e data indicate signifi cant increase in the demand for cruises in the lower Danube. Th e number of tourists buying river cruises increased by 26.1% in 2004 (compared to 2002) (Figure 6). Th erefore, we can conclude that there was a dramatic increase in the demand for cruises in the lower sector of the Danube [9–11]. Moreover, there are two national parks located on the right bank of the Danube – Fruška Gora and Djerdap, which could potentially attract large number of visitors in the future [12; 13]. Priority projects for the improvement of the Danube waterway in Serbia Th e Republic of Serbia aims to improve its system of inland waterways, provide their main- tenance and ensure safe navigation. Th e pending Law on Navigation Safety and Ports would reg- ulate navigation on the rivers; modernisation of ports and piers, application of River Information Services, and so on. Th e European Strategy for the Danube en- compasses a number of projects for the develop- ment of infrastructure, transport, logistics and tourism on the Corridor VII. Th e focus is on three priority areas: mobility and multimodality (road, rail, and air routes, inland waterways); promotion of sustainable energy; and promotion of culture and tourism. In line with the Strategy, Serbia’s is now implementing the following priority projects on the Danube River16: 16 General Master Plan for Transport in Serbia. Annex III (2009). Transport on Inland Waterways, Belgrade. – major overhaul of the navigation lock at Djerdap I and Djerdap II (the works on Djerdap I are already in progress); – removal of World War II sunken vessels near Prahovo; – removal of the old bridge and construc- tion of the new railway bridge in Novi Sad (in progress); – hydro-technical works; – implementation of the River Information Services (RIS implementation project on the Dan- ube river in Serbia, started in 2009, reached its fi - nal phase). Th e key projects for improvement of tourism infrastructure on the Serbian part of the Danube are as follows: – marina on the Danube River near Novi Sad; – establishment of the Information Centre for Nautical Tourism and smaller information points on the Danube; – pier in Zemun; – Marina OASA (Belgrade). Th eir realization would contribute to safe and effi cient navigation on the Danube and would set higher ecological standards on the Serbian section of the Corridor VII. Most of the above-mentioned projects have already been launched, except for the project for removal of sunken vessels and un- exploded bombs near Prahovo, which is being de- layed due to the lack of funds. Conclusion Serbia’s location at the crossroads of the ma- jor European transport corridors (water, road, rail, and air) provides it with opportunities 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Figure 6. Th e total annual number of river cruisers in Belgrade in 2002–2015 Source: Offi cial data of the port of Belgrade R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 113 www.r-economy.ru Online ISSN 2412-0731 for sustainable economic development, which makes the Danube or the Corridor VII crucial for the country’s prosperity. However, despite the advantages the Danube off ers, its navigation potential remains underrealized for a number of reasons, primarily economic ones. Although Serbia accounts for 13% of the ship tonnage in the Danube region, it’s fl eet is old and outdated and on average only 30% of the port capacities due to the lack of goods for transhipment. As Serbia is currently in the process of joining the EU, it has become evident that modernization and maintenance of its fl eet are required as the country is likely to receive more foreign invest- ment and engage in international cooperation projects. Furthermore, the Danube Strategy has been adopted with the aim of synchronizing the activities of the Danube region countries for sus- tainable development. Improvement and stimulation of water trans- port development are crucial for economic pros- perity of the region as water transport is a good alternative to road and rail transport, it is also en- ergy effi cient and environmentally safe. Accord- ing to the General Transport Master Plan of the Republic of Serbia (2009), the aim is to increase of the share of water transport in cargo and freight transportation and to modernize the river fl eet. Hence, it is extremely important to implement the system of the River Information Services that would cut transportation time and make trans- portation more cost eff ective. Intermodal transport development is rec- ognised as yet another factor contributing to sus- tainable economic development of Serbia. Th e Danube in particular has several high priority projects which could fi nally improve the condi- tion of the navigation: for example, removal of the sunken German ships and unexploded bombs left from World War II near Prahovo. Another key project is the reconstruction of the ship locks Djerdap I and Djerdap II and construction of a new bridge near Novi Sad. Surprisingly, in our research we faced diffi cul- ties when gathering data on the use of the Danube inland waterways: the statistical data provided by offi cial sources are oft en inaccurate, moreover, such data are oft en hard to obtain. For instance, cruise tourists are excluded from the data on the overall tourist turnover by the Statistical Offi ce, although they on average spend 2–3 days in na- tional waters. Th is study has provided evidence that more attention should be devoted to trans-border co- operation in the Danube region. Further research is necessary into the problem of inadequate com- munication between border regions, particularly if such regions share renewable energy resources. References 1. Štetić, S. (2007). Special Forms of Tourism. Belgrade. 2. Milanković, J. (2015). Danube as a Transport Artery and Axis of Development in the Republic of Serbia (PhD thesis). Novi Sad: Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management. 3. Dragin, A., Jovičić, D. &  Bošković, D. (2010). Economic Impact of Cruise Tour- ism Along the Pan-European Corridor VII. Economic Research. 23(4), 127–141. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2010.11517438 4. Radmilović, Z., & Maraš, V. (2011). Role of Danube Inland Navigation in Europe. Interna- tional Journal for Traffi c and Transport Engineering, 1(1), 28–40. Retrieved from http://ijtte.com/ uploads/2011-04-16/d4c8811d-9674-f24aIJTTE%20r01%2028-40.pdf 5. Rissoan J. P. (1994). River-Sea Navigation in Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(2), 131–142. 6. Wiegmans, B. W., Masurel, E. & Nijkamp, P. (1999). Intermodal Freight Terminals: An Analysis of the Terminal Market. Transportation Planning & Technology, 23(2), 105-128. doi: 10.1080/03081069908717643 7. Mihić, S., Golušin, M. & Mihajlović, M. (2011). Policy and Promotion of Sustainable Inland Waterway Transport in Europe-Danube River. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 1801–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.033 8. Dragin, A. (2010). International Cruising the Corridor 7. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management. 9. Dragin, A., Dragin, V., Košić, K., Demirović, D., Ivkov-Džigurski, A. (2017). Tourists Mo- tives and Residents Attitude towards Cruisers. In: Southern and Eastern Europe 2017: Tourism and 114 www.r-economy.ru R-ECOMONY, 2018, 4(3), 105–114 doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.015 Online ISSN 2412-0731 Creative Industries: Trends and Challenges: 4th International Scientifi c Conference, Opatija, Croatia, 4–6 May 2017. Vol. 4 (pp. 133–144). Opatija: University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management. doi: 10.20867/tosee.04.42 10. Demonja, D. (2012). Th e Importance of the Danube Strategy for Tourism and Culture De- velopment of the Croatian Danube Region. Geographica Pannonica, 16(3), 112–125. doi: 10.5937/ GeoPan1203112D 11. Vujko, A., & Gajić, T. (2014). Opportunities for Tourism Development and Cooperation in the Region by Improving the Quality of Tourism Services-the ‘Danube Cycle Route’ Case Study. Eco- nomic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 27(1), 847–860. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2014.975517 12. Dragićević, S., Mészáros, M., Djuridjić, S., Pavić, D., Novković, I., & Radislav, T. (2013). Vulnerability of National Parks to Natural Hazards in the Serbian Danube Region. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(4), 1053–1060. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publi- cation/255828318_Vulnerability_of_National_Parks_to_Natural_Hazards_in_the_Serbian_Dan- ube_Region 13. Lukić, D., Berjan, S., & El Bilali, H. (2018). Indicators of Tourism Development of the Ser- bian Danube Region. R-Economy, 4(1), 30–37. Retrieved from http://r-economy.ru/wp-content/up- loads/2018/03/r-economy_2018_v4_1_05.pdf Information about the authors Jelena Milanković Jovanov – PhD in Geosciences, Teaching Assistant at the Department of Ge- ography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zorana Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: milankovicjovanov@gmail.com. Dragoslav Pavić – PhD in Geosciences, Full Professor at the Department of Geography, Tour- ism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zorana Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: dragoslav.pavic@dgt.uns.ac.rs. Jasmina Đorđević – PhD in Geosciences, Full Professor at the Department of Geography, Tour- ism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zorana Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: jasminadjordjevic@live.com. Aleksandra Dragin – PhD in Geosciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Geog- raphy, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zorana Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: aleksandra.dragin@dgt.uns.ac.rs. Smiljana Đukičin Vučković – PhD in Geosciences, Assistant Professor at the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zora- na Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: smiljanadjukicin@gmail.com. Minucsér Mészáros – PhD in Geosciences, Assistant Professor at the Department of Geogra- phy, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad (1 Dr Zorana Đinđića, 21101 Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia); e-mail: minucer.mesaros@dgt.uns.ac.rs.