RATIO MATHEMATICA 23 (2012), 81–86 ISSN: 1592-7415 Closed, Reflexive, Invertible, and Normal Subhypergroups of Special Hypergroups Pavĺına Račková University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic pavlina.rackova@unob.cz Abstract In [5] J. Jantosciak introduced several special types of subhyper- groups (invertible, closed, normal, reflexive) of a general hypergroup and studied their relationship. In this article, the full description of such subhypergroups in hypergroups induced by quasiordered groups is given. Further, it is shown that there are no such non-trivial sub- hypergroups in quasiorder hypergroups. Key words: Hypergroup, transposition hypergroup, join space, closed, reflexive, invertible, and normal subhypergroup, quasiordered group, quasiorder hypergroup. MSC 2010: 20N20. 1 Introduction We will sum up basic concepts from hypergroup theory and results which will be needed in the following text. • Let H 6= ∅. A mapping ∗: H × H → P∗ is called binary hyperoperation on H. The pair (H,∗) is hypergroupoid. • A hypergroupoid (H,∗) is extensive if {a, b}⊆ a ∗ b for any a, b ∈ H. • A hypergroupoid (H,∗) is called hypergroup if the hyperoperation ∗ is associative, i.e (x ∗ y) ∗ z = x ∗ (y ∗ z) for any x, y, z ∈ H, Pavĺına Račková and the reproduction axiom a ∗ H = H = H ∗ a for any a ∈ H is satisfied. • Let (H,∗) be a hypergroup and S ⊆ H. Assume that a ∗ b ⊆ S for any a, b ∈ S. Thus (S,∗) is an associative hypergroupoid (so called semihyper- group). If, moreover, it satisfies the reproduction axiom, that is, it is a hypergroup, we say that (S,∗) is subhypergroup of (H,∗). • A hypergroup (H,∗) is called transposition hypergroup if the transposition axiom is satisfied, that is, for any quadruple of elements a, b, c, d ∈ H the implication: If b\a ≈ c/d, then a ∗ d ≈ b ∗ c holds, where b\a = {x ∈ H : a ∈ b ∗ x}, c/d = {x ∈ H : c ∈ x ∗ d} are left and right extensions, respectively. (For two set A, B, the symbol A ≈ B means that A and B are incident, i.e. A ∩ B 6= ∅.) • A commutative transposition hypergroup (H,∗) is called join space. The following concepts play the key role in the formulation of the main results. Definition 1.1 A subhypergroup (S,∗) of a hypergroup (H,∗) is called • closed if a/b ⊆ S and b\a ⊆ S for any a, b ∈ S, • invertible if a/b ≈ S implies b/a ≈ S and b\a ≈ S implies a\b ≈ S for any a, b ∈ H, • reflexive if a\S = S/a for any a ∈ H, • normal if a ∗ S = S ∗ a for any a ∈ H. J. Jantosciak (see [5]) proved that • invertible subhypergroup of any hypergroup is closed, • closed and normal subhypergroup of a transposition hypergroup is reflexive, • invertible and normal subhypergroup of a transposition hypergroup is closed and reflexive. 82 Closed, Reflexive, Invertible, and . . . 2 Hypergroups Induced by Quasiordered Groups First the relationship among closed, normal, invertible, and reflexive sub- hypergroups of hypergroups induced by quasiordering will be tackled. Definition 2.1 An ordered (quasiordered) group is a triple (H, ·,≤), where (H, ·) is a group and “≤” is an ordering (quasiordering) on H having the substitution property on (H, ·), that is for any quadruple a, b, c, d ∈ H such that a ≤ b, c ≤ d, there is a · c ≤ b · d. A hyperoperation is naturally induced on each (quasi)ordered group (H, ·,≤). For x ∈ H, let us denote [x)≤ the principal end generated by x, that is [x)≤ = {y ∈ H : x ≤ y}. Analogously the principal beginning (x]≤ is defined. For x, y ∈ H, let us denote x ∗ y = [x · y)≤. Then (H,∗) is a hypergroupoid associated with (H, ·,≤). The following result can be proven (see [3, 6, 7]): Theorem 2.1 Let (H, ·,≤) be a quasiordered group and (H,∗) the hyper- groupoid associated with it. Then (H,∗) is the transposition hypergroup. Let (G, ·,≤) be a quasiordered group, (G,∗), where a∗b = [a ·b)≤, be the induced (transposition) hypergroup. Let (S,∗) be its subhypergroup, that is, [x · y)≤ ⊂ S holds for x, y ∈ S, namely x · y ∈ S. For the right and left extensions we have: a/b = {x ∈ G : a ∈ x ∗ b} = {x ∈ G : x · b ≤ a} = = {x ∈ G : x ≤ a · b−1}, b\a = {x ∈ G : a ∈ b ∗ x} = {x ∈ G : b · x ≤ a} = = {x ∈ G : x ≤ b−1 · a}. Theorem 2.2 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is closed iff (S, ·) is a subgroup of the group (G, ·) and (a]≤ ∪ [a)≤ ⊂ S for any a ∈ S. Proof. Necessity: For a ∈ S there is a/a = (e]≤, hence e ∈ S (e is the neutral element). If a ∈ S, then e/a = (a−1]≤, hence a−1 ∈ S. If a ∈ S, then a/e = (a]≤, hence (a]≤ ⊂ S. Because (S,∗) is a subhyper- group we also get a ∗ e = [a)≤ ⊂ S. Sufficiency: Let a, b ∈ S. Then a · b−1 ∈ S, so (a · b−1]≤ = a/b ⊂ S. Analogously for b\a. 2 83 Pavĺına Račková Theorem 2.3 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is closed iff it is invertible. Proof. Each invertible subhypergroup is closed. Now, let us assume that (S,∗) is closed. If a/b ≈ S, there exists x ∈ S such that x ≤ a · b−1. Due to the previous theorem a · b−1 ∈ S and also (a·b−1)−1 = b·a−1 ∈ S, therefore b/a ⊂ S. Especially, b/a ≈ S. Analogously the statement for b\a can be proven. 2 Theorem 2.4 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive iff the following property holds: If for x, y ∈ G the element x · y is covered by an element of S, then y · x is also covered by an element of S. Proof. The following equalities hold: a\S = ⋃ b∈S a\b = ⋃ b∈S (a−1 · b]≤ , S/a = ⋃ b∈S b/a = ⋃ b∈S (b · a−1]≤ . Hence, x ∈ a\S iff b ∈ S exists such that x ≤ a−1 · b, that is, a · x ≤ b. Analogously x ∈ S/a iff c ∈ S exists such that x · a ≤ c. This implies the statement. 2 If (S,∗) is a closed subhypergroup, according to the previous result, the condition “to be comparable with an element of S” is equivalent with the condition “to be in S”. Therefore, we get: Corollary 2.1 A closed subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive iff the following property holds: If for x, y ∈ G the element x · y ∈ S, then also y · x ∈ S. Theorem 2.5 A subhypergroup (S,∗) is normal iff the following property holds: If x · y, where x, y ∈ G, covers an element of S, then y · x also covers an element of S. Proof. The following equalities hold: a ∗ S = ⋃ b∈S a ∗ b = ⋃ b∈S [a · b)≤ , S ∗ a = ⋃ b∈S b ∗ a = ⋃ b∈S [b · a)≤ . Hence, x ∈ a ∗ S iff b ∈ S exists such that a · b ≤ x, that is, b ≤ a−1 · x. Analogously x ∈ S ∗a iff c ∈ S exists such that c ≤ x ·a−1. This implies the statement. 2 84 Closed, Reflexive, Invertible, and . . . In case (S,∗) is a closed subhypergroup, analogously to reflexive subhy- pergroups we have: Corollary 2.2 A closed subhypergroup (S,∗) is normal iff the following prop- erty holds: If for x, y ∈ G the element x · y ∈ S, than also y · x ∈ S. Joining the previous two results we get: Corollary 2.3 Let (S,∗) be a closed subhypergroup. Then (S,∗) is normal iff it is reflexive. 3 Quasiorder Hypergroups Now the relationship among closed, normal, invertible, and reflexive sub- hypergroups of quasiorder hypergroups will be tackled. If R is a quasiordering on H we denote R(a) = {x ∈ H : a R x}. Further, for A ⊆ H we set R(A) = ⋃ a∈A R(a). Theorem 3.1 Let (H, R) be a quasiordered set. For any pair a, b ∈ H we set a ∗R b = R(a) ∪ R(b) = R({a, b}). Then (H,∗R) is commutative extensive hypergroup. For the proof see [3, p. 150, Th. 2.1]. Definition 3.1 A hypergroup (H,∗) is said quasiorder if the following con- ditions are satisfied: • a ∈ a3 ⊆ a2, • a ∗ b = a2 ∪ b2 for any a, b ∈ H. The following theorem characterizes all quasiorder hypergroups. Theorem 3.2 A hypergroup (H,∗) is quasiorder iff a quasiordering R on H exists such that for any a, b ∈ H there is a ∗ b = R(a) ∪ R(b) = R({a, b}). For the proof see [1, p. 96]. 85 Pavĺına Račková Theorem 3.3 Let (G,∗) be a quasiorder hypergroup. Then any subhyper- group of (G,∗) is reflexive and normal. Moreover, (G,∗) contains no proper closed or invertible subhypergroup. Proof. Suppose that (G,∗) is a quasiorder hypergroup and R is a qua- siordering from the previous theorem. The hyperoperation ∗ is commutative, hence any subhypergroup (S,∗) is reflexive and normal. Further, a/b = {x ∈ G : a ∈ b ∗ x} = {x ∈ G : a ∈ R(b) ∪ R(x)}. Especially a/a = G. If (S,∗) is closed, then necessarily S = G. Therefore, no proper closed subhypergroup exists. Analogously, any invertible subhypergroup is closed, therefore, no proper invertible subhypergroup exists. 2 References [1] Corsini, P., Leoreanu, V., Applications of Hyperstructure Theory. Kluwer AP, Dordrecht, Boston, London 2003, 322 pp. [2] Hošková, Š., Representation of quasi-order hypergroups. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, Number 2, India (2005), pp. 173–176. [3] Chvalina, J., Funkcionálńı grafy, kvaziuspořádané množiny a komutativńı hypergrupy. Brno, MU 1995, 206 pp. (in Czech) [4] Jantosciak, J., Transposition in hypergroups. Internat. Congress on AHA 6 (Prague 1996), Democtritus Univ. of Thrace Press, Alexandropo- lis, 1997, pp. 77–84. [5] Jantosciak, J., Transposition hypergroups: Noncommutative join spaces. J. Algebra 187 (1997), pp. 97–119. [6] Račková, P., Akce polohypergrup a modelováńı hypergrup integrálńımi operátory. PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc 2008, Czech Rep., 73 pp. (in Czech) [7] Račková, P., Hypergroups of symmetric matrices. 10th International Congress on AHA (Brno 2008), Proceedings, pp. 267–271, ISBN 978- 80-7231-688-5. 86