Ratio Mathematica Volume 42, 2022 Abel fractional differential equations using Variation of parameters method N. Nithyadevi* P. Prakash† Abstract The Variation of Parameters Method (VPM) is utilized throughout the research to identify a numerical model for a nonlinear fractional Abel differential equation (FADE). The approach given here is used to solve the initial problem of fractional Abel differential equations. There is no conversion, quantization, disturbance, structural change, or precautionary concerns in the proposed method, although it is easy with numerical solutions. The measured values are graphed and tab- ulated to be compared with the numerical model. Keywords: Abel fractional differential equations; Reimann-liouville fractional integral; Reimann-liouville fractional derivative; variation of parameters method.1 *N.Nithyadevi (Research Scholar, Department of Mathematics, Periyar University, Salem- 636011, INDIA); nithyadevi84bu@gmail.com. †P. Prakash (Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Periyar University, Salem- 636011, INDIA); pprakashmaths@gmail.com. 1Received on February 25th, 2022. Accepted on June 20th, 2022. Published on June 30th, 2022. doi: 10.23755/rm.v41i0.723. ISSN: 1592-7415. eISSN: 2282-8214. ©The Authors. This paper is published under the CC-BY licence agreement. 135 N. Nithyadevi and P. Prakash 1 Introduction Abel differential equations is well established, perturbed of implementations in structure and function in dynamics, linear systems with Stochastic, modeling technique, and linear algebra. Numerous research has been done mostly on meth- ods of the Abel differential equations. we suggest several methods, including the iterative method of the Abel differential equation achieved from the variation iteration method. We consider the following nonlinear FADE: Dβf(x) = P1f 3(x) + P2f 2(x) + P3f(x) + P4, 0 < β ≤ 1, 0 ≤ x ≤ R. (1) with the initial condition fk(0) = uk, k = 1, 2, 3, ....n − 1. (2) where P1, P2, P3 and P4 are arbitrary number, Dβ is the fractional derivative for order β and f(x) is unknown function of the crisp variable x, k is an integer. How- ever, assume IVPs (0.2) and each x > 0 has a unique fuzzy solution. The VPM calculation is a novel numeric plan created to examine and decipher the arrange- ment of first and second request dubious IVPs. Computer simulation, biophysics, synthetic science, applied mathematics, geophysics, material science, harmonies, and other domains rely heavily on linear and non-linear fractional equations. This is seeing fractional derivatives must store the record of the parameter under delib- eration. The proposed approach targets constructing an answer of a VPM devel- opment just as limiting remaining blunder capacities for processing the obscure coefficients of VPM by applying a specific differential administrator without lin- early or constraint on the structure. Again, we refer to see numerous qualities to show and reconsider some radical strategies for managing the various problems that occur in ordinary miracles. 2 Preliminaries The definitions of significance and associated characteristics of the hypothesis are examined in this section. Definition 2.1. The fractional component of Riemann-Liouville, f the valued function of the fuzzy number β is considered to include Jβαf(x) = 1 Γ(β) ∫ x 0 f(ξ) (x−ξ)1−β dξ , x > a where Γ(β) is the famous Gamma characteristic. Definition 2.2. The Riemann-Liouville fractional order derivative β of the crisp function f almost everywhere on I exists and can be represented by RLa D βf(x) = 1 Γ(m−β) dm dxm ∫ x 0 f(ξ)(x − ξ)m−β−1dξ, where m − 1 ≤ β < m ∈ Z+. 136 Abel fractional differential equations using Variation of parameters method Definition 2.3. The modified Riemann-Liouville fractional order derivative β of the crisp function f almost everywhere on I exists and can be represented by RL a D βf(x) = 1 Γ(m−β) dm dxm ∫ x 0 (f(ξ) − f(0))(x − ξ)m−β−1dξ, where m − 1 ≤ β < m, and m ≥ 1. Remark 2.1. . (i) Riemann-Liouville derivative does not satisfy Dαα(1) = 0 (D α α(1) = 0 for the Caputo derivative), if α is not a natural number (ii) All fractionals do not satisfy the known formula of the derivative of product of the two functions: Dαα(fg) = f(D α α(g)) + g(D α α(f)) (ii) All fractionals do not satisfy the known formula of the derivative of quotient of the two functions: Dαα( f g ) = g(Dαα(f))−f(Dαα(g)) g2 3 Variation of parameters method We consider the extensive expression to derive the main definition of the VPM L(u) + N(u) + R(u) = f(x), a ≤ x ≤ b (3) where L, N operators are linear and non-linear. R is a linear differential operator but L has the highest order than R, f(x) is a source term in the given domain [a, b]. We have the following equation solution by using the VPM u(x) = ∑k−1 l=0 pl+1x l l! + ∫ x 0 f(x, α)(−N(u)(α) − R(u)(α) + f(α))dα, (4) where k represent the order of given differential equation and Cl where l = 1, 2, 3,are unknown. So u(x) = ∑k−1 l=0 pl+1x l l! (5) For homogeneous solution which is used by L(u) = 0. (6) 137 N. Nithyadevi and P. Prakash Another component obtained from definition (0.2) from VPM is∫ x 0 f(x, α)(−N(u)(α) − R(u)(α) + f(α))dα. (7) Where, f(x, α) is a Lagrange multiplier which that eliminates the incremental use of integers in the inverse problem and is dependent on the order of equations. The explore description is based on calculating the function of the variable f(x, α) from either a set of numbers. f(x, α) = ∑k−1 l=0 (−1)l−1αl−1xk−1 (l−1)!(k−1)! = (x−α)k−1 (k−1)! , (8) The sequence of the specific differential equations differs with k. We have always had the following criteria to explore: k = 1, f(x, α) = 1, k = 2, f(x, α) = (x − α) k = 3, f(x, α) = x 2 2! + α 2 2! − αx (9) As a result, we utilize its investigation to improve, the system to solve equations un+1 = u0 + ∫ x 0 f(x, α)(−N(u)(α) − R(u)(α) + f(α))dα. (10) Using initial conditions, we can obtain the initial guess u0(x). We improve our estimate by using a specific value for the input parameter in each iteration. We are using Reimann-Liouville to solve the fractional Abel differential condition. When we combine VPM with a fractional integral for the arrangement process, the iterative plan for fractional equations is un+1 = u0 + 1 Γ(β) ∫ x 0 f(x, α)x−α(−N(u)(α) − R(u)(α) + f(α))dα. (11) 4 Numerical Examples Example 4.1. We Consider the following fractional Abel problem, Dβf(x) − 3f3(x) + f(x) = 1, 0 < β ≤ 1, x > 0, (12) with initial condition f(0) = 1 3 can be found as follows: f(x) = 1√ 6e2x+3 . (13) For the above problem, we create the iterative scheme shown below fn+1 = f0 + 1 Γ(β) ∫ x 0 (x − α)β−1(3f3(x) − f(x))dα (14) 138 Abel fractional differential equations using Variation of parameters method x Exact value VPM Absolute error 0.0 [0.3333] [0.2916] [0.0417] 0.1 [0.3111] [0.3062] [0.0049] 0.2 [0.2892] [0.2730] [0.0162] 0.3 [0.2679] [0.2531] [0.0148] 0.4 [0.2472] [0.2374] [0.0098] 0.5 [0.2275] [0.2164] [0.0111] 0.6 [0.2088] [0.1943] [0.0145] 0.7 [0.1912] [0.1804] [0.0108] 0.8 [0.1748] [0.1692] [0.0056] 0.9 [0.1595] [0.1439] [0.0156] 1.0 [0.1453] [0.1379] [0.0074] Table 1: Value of f(x), β = 1 x β = 0.7 β = 0.8 β = 0.9 0.0 0.3201 0.3197 0.2932 0.2 0.2817 0.2809 0.2782 0.4 0.2402 0.2397 0.2381 0.6 0.2007 0.1991 0.1962 0.8 0.1731 0.1706 0.1699 1.0 0.1497 0.1399 0.1388 Table 2: Different values of β Taking initial condition f(0) = 1 3 , the following results for β = 1 are pro- duced: f1(x) = 1 3 − 2 9 x f2(x) = 7 24 − 4 9 x + 4 81 x3 − 2 243 x4 f3(x) = 7 24 − 3049 4608 x + 5 96 x2 + 2 9 x3 − 133 1728 x4 − 881 3880 x5 + 13 729 x6 − 2 1701 x7 − 13 8748 x8 + 5 13122 x9 + 8 885735 x10 − 32 1948617 x11 + 4 1594323 x12 − 8 62178597 x13. Table 1 show a approximate solution and exact solution for β = 1. Table 2 shows different values of β. Fig 1 represents the exact and approximate solution. 139 N. Nithyadevi and P. Prakash Figure 1: Value of f(x) Example 4.2. We Consider the following fractional Abel problem, Dβf(x) + f3(x) − f(x) = 1, 0 < β ≤ 1, x > 0, (15) with initial condition f(0) = 1 3 can be found as follows: f(x) = e t √ e2t+8 . (16) For the above problem, we create the iterative scheme shown below fn+1 = f0 + 1 Γ(β) ∫ x 0 (x − α)β−1(f(x) − f3(x))dα (17) Taking initial condition f(0) = 1 3 , the following results for β = 1 are produced: f1(x) = 1 3 + 8 27 x f2(x) = 31 96 + 16 27 x + 8 81 x2 − 64 2187 x3 − 128 19683 x4 f3(x) = 31 96 + 780193 884736 x+ 1045 3456 x2− 11201 93312 x3− 38591 419904 x4− 2657 157464 x5+ 784 177147 x6+ 3776 1594323 x7 − 2240 14348907 x8 − 100864 1162261467 x9 − 851968 52301766015 x10 − 131072 345191655699 x11 + 262144 847288609443 x12 + 2097152 99132767304831 x13. 140 Abel fractional differential equations using Variation of parameters method x Exact value VPM Absolute error 0.0 [0.3333] [0.3229] [0.0104] 0.1 [0.3639] [0.3508] [0.0131] 0.2 [0.3964] [0.3872] [0.0092] 0.3 [0.4307] [0.4139] [0.0168] 0.4 [0.4665] [0.4477] [0.0188] 0.5 [0.5035] [0.4972] [0.0063] 0.6 [0.5415] [0.5128] [0.0287] 0.7 [0.5799] [0.5524] [0.0275] 0.8 [0.6183] [0.6106] [0.0077] 0.9 [0.6561] [0.6392] [0.0169] 1.0 [0.6929] [0.6548] [0.0381] Table 3: Value of f(x), β = 1 x β = 0.7 β = 0.8 β = 0.9 0.0 0.3301 0.3299 0.3271 0.2 0.3956 0.3907 0.3882 0.4 0.4641 0.4596 0.4481 0.6 0.5364 0.5209 0.5197 0.8 0.6180 0.6159 0.6132 1.0 0.6877 0.6792 0.6674 Table 4: Different values of β Table 3 shows a approximate solution and exact solution for β = 1. Table 4 shows different values of β. Fig 2 represents the exact and approximate solution. 141 N. Nithyadevi and P. Prakash Figure 2: Value of f(x) 5 Conclusions In this study, we examined the formulation to fractional Abel equation with the Variation of Parameters method. We demonstrate that VPM is a functional, efficient approach for the achievement of empirical and numerical testing for a wide variety of nonlinear fractional equations. We discovered that obtained esti- mate effects for different beta values interact simultaneously before the first-order derivative is exceeded. 6 References [1] A. Khastan, J. J. Nieto and R. Rodriguez-Lopez,” Schauder fixed-point the- orem in semilinear spaces and its application to fractional differential equa- tions with uncertainty”, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, 21(2014). [2] A.Kilbas, H. Srivastava and J. Trujillo,” Theory and Applications of Frac- tional Differential Equations”, vol.204 of North-Holland Mathematical stud- ies, Elsevier, New York, 2006. [3] I. Podlubny ” Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 198, Academic Pree, New York, 1999. 142 Abel fractional differential equations using Variation of parameters method [4] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas and O. I. Marichev, ” Fractional Integrals and Derivatives”, Theory and Applications, Gordon and Breach Science Pub- lishers, India, 1993. [5] S. Salahshour, T. Allahviranloo et.al, ” Solving fuzzy fractional differen- tial equations by fuzzy Laplace transform”, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 17(2012) 1372-1381. [6] G. M. Zaslavsky, ”Hamiltonian chaos and fractional dynamics ”, Oxford University Press on Demand, 2005. [7] M. Merdan, A. Yildirim, and A. Gokdogan, ”Numerical solution of time- fraction modified equal width wave equation”, Engineering Computations, 29(7), 2012. [8] S. T. Mohyud-Din, M.A. Noor and A.Waheed, ”Variation of Parameters method for initial and boundary value problems 1”, Journal of World Ap- plied Sciences, 11(2010),622-639. [9] G. Jumarie, ”Laplace’s transform of fractional order via the Mittag-Leffler function and modified Riemann-Liouville derivative”, Applied Mathemat- ics Letters, 22(11),(2009)1659-1664. [10] M. A. Noor, S. T. Mohyud-Din, and A.Waheed, ”Variation of Parameters method for solving fifth-order boundary value problems”, Applied Mathe- matics and Information Sciences, 2(2) (2008) 135-141. [11] M. Hao and C. Zhai, Application of Schauder fixed point theorem to a cou- pled system of differential equations of fractional order, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 7 (2014), 131–137. [12] R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef. and M. Sababheh, A new Definition of Fractional Derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), pp. 65–70. [13] K. S. Miller, An introduction to fractional calculus and fractional differen- tial equations, J.Wiley, and Sons, New York, (1993). [14] J. A. Nanware and D. B. Dhaigude, Existence and uniqueness of solutions of differential equations of fractional order with integral boundary conditions, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 7 (2014), 246–254. 143