Copyright © 2018, REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education) ISSN 2460-6995 REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018, 35-44 Available online at: http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid Developing an instrument for measuring the spiritual attitude of high school students *1Safa’at Ariful Hudha; 2Djemari Mardapi 1,2Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 1Jl. Colombo No. 1, Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia *Corresponding Author. E-mail: safaat.a.huda@gmail.com Submitted: 11 July 2018 | Revised: 31 August 2018 | Accepted: 18 September 2018 Abstract Attitudinal competence is one the most fundamental concepts in social psychology. It is related to per- sonal identity, moral, and ethics that gains popularity and becomes important in educational development. This research aims to develop an instrument to measure the spiritual attitude of high school students. The study was a research and development study consisting of four stages: (a) determining conceptual defi- nition, (b) determining operational definition, (c) drawing indicators, and (d) constructing instrument. The quantitative data analysis was used to test the construct validity through Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the coefficient of construct reliability was used to estimate the instrument reliability. The results of the study show that: (1) the instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual attitude is an inventory model of sum- mated rating scale containing 35 items; (2) the construct validity was proven by the value of the stan- dardized loading factor and considered as significant. The instrument reliability regarded as the construct reliability coefficient is 0.890 and the average variance extracted is 0.542; (3) the construct of the instru- ment produces a fit statistical evidence indicated by the Goodness of Fit Index = 0.91 (≥0.90), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.032 (≤0.08). The results indicate that the construct of the mea- surement is suitable with the data. In addition, this research has confirmed that the spiritual attitude of high school students is constructed by seven aspects, namely resignation (tawakal), sincerity (ikhlas), thank- fulness (syukur), patience (shabr), fear (khauf), hopefulness (raja’), and righteousness (takwa). Keywords: spiritual attitude, validity, reliability Introduction In the last decade, many people have been looking for the meaning and purpose of their lives as well as some spiritual experi- ences. It has been continuously emerged in the recent studies which have been presented by a number of researchers (Brown, 2007; Fisher, 2013). Although it has been discussed in many studies, the exact definition of spiri- tual experience has not been clearly explained yet. Further, the circumstance of spirituality itself can be indicated by the meaning of human life although how people intended and interpreted the meaning of life satisfaction is still being investigated (Smither & Khorsandi, 2009). Spirituality can be interpreted as an understanding related to human identity, their ethic, and their way of life. Besides, it also explains a fundamental element that makes people full of energy and reveals the state of feeling which is integrated with overall inter- nal human resources in the meaning beyond their religious belief (Min & Yun, 2015). In fact, spirituality dimension is almost always identified as being equal to the religious state. Furthermore, in order to support the previous statement, it is found that people with highly religious state are typically more spiritual, al- though it is somewhat at a lesser extent (Bryant, Choi, & Yasuno, 2003; Nikfarjam, Heidari-Soureshjani, Khoshdel, Asmand, & Ganji, 2017). REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 36 – Developing an instrument for measuring... Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi The meaning of spirituality as a psycho- metric property has been variously defined. However, declaring the exact meaning of spirituality becomes a difficult thing (Fisher, 2016). There is no specific term which can de- scribe how spirituality is explained. The most unclear discussion of the spiritual aspect is emphasized on the issue of the transcendental element (Koenig, 2009). One such study implies that spirituality, as a complex construct, includes existential and also religious dimensions (Hungelmann, Kenkel-Rossi, Klassen, & Stollenwerk, 1996). It refers to the affective experiences of posi- tive feelings from the person’s ability to un- derstand the purpose in life - related to per- sonal, communal, and transcendental aspects (Soleimani et al., 2017). Religious dimension as the transcendental aspect in the construct of spirituality can be determined as a person’s qualification and his/her ability to control his/her feelings related to how he/she inter- prets and makes a reflection of his/her reli- gious belief. Furthermore, spirituality is not only evolved in terms of religious dimensions, but also becomes one of the most prominent subjects in the media and various disciplines, also in many salient factors especially in hu- man health integrated with the internal forces (Azarsa, Davoodi, Markani, Gahramanian, & Vargaeei, 2015; Moberg, 2002). Another outstanding theory explains spirituality as a personal belief in God or a higher power in the religious adherents (Good & Willoughby, 2006). In addition, Shodiq, Zamroni, and Kumaidi (2016) assert that as a transcendental element, spirituality in Islamic studies and in terms of Islamic faith has two dimensions, namely: belief (tashdiq-al-qalb) which is known as rukun iman, and also atti- tude or personal feeling (amal-al-qalb) which has seven aspects i.e. thankfulness (syukur), fear (khauf), love (mahabbah), patience, resigna- tion (tawakkal), hopefulness (raja), and sinceri- ty (ikhlas). In the same term of Islamic studies, spirituality based on a Moslem perspective centers on loving submission and closeness to God (Ghorbani, Watson, Geranmayepour, & Chen, 2014). Spirituality and religiosity are often used interchangeably, but the two concepts are very different. Sheridan and Hemert (1999) define spirituality as a human search for the purpose and meaning of life experience, while Tanyi (2002) argues that spirituality is a per- sonal search for the purpose and meaning in life. Spirituality entails connection to religious beliefs or self-chosen faith. The two previous definitions are almost the same thing, but there is a slight difference. Spirituality accord- ing to the first description is emphasized on the meaning of life experience, while the se- cond is focused on the meaning in life. According to Hill et al. (2000), the term ‘spirituality’ can be used to describe ‘one’s re- ligious experiences,’ while the term ‘religiosity’ is used to express ‘the state of belief.’ Spiri- tuality in the general view seems more basic, positive, and sincere while religiosity implies the ritual and obedience in worship related to certain religious adherents. One of the most important and funda- mental concepts in social psychology is atti- tudinal competence (Bidjari, 2011). Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) define attitude as a person’s location on a bipolar evaluation of affective dimension concerning some objects, viewed as predisposing the individual to do various overt behaviours. Likewise, attitude refers to the people’s predisposition to respond con- sistently whether they like the object or not (Mardapi, 2017, p. 134). The term ‘bipolar evaluation of affective dimension’ can be de- scribed as the state of positive and negative feeling onto the particular object. The attitude in this way consists of the positive and nega- tive direction. According to Kusaeri and Suprananto (2012, p. 206), like the previous explanation, attitudinal competence is defined as a state of readiness to react to an object in a certain way as a form of evaluation and reflection of feel- ing. Furthermore, Sax (1980, p. 493) empha- sizes the characteristics of attitude which con- tains some dimensions, i.e. direction, inten- sity, pervasiveness, consistency, and salience. In relation to the spiritual term, attitude can be explained as a person’s predisposition to choose his/her response to the prevalent situation with an internalization of specific di- mension correlating with his/her religious un- derstanding and spiritual conception. Spiritual REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 Developing an instrument for measuring… - 37 Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi attitude is more often identified as the same as religious attitude. Hill et al. (2000) affirm that both spirituality and religiosity have been recognized as having a relationship with a per- son’s mental health status and are relevant to the study of personality and in the genetic determinants of personality. Further, Huber and Huber (2012) state that the dimensions of spiritual attitude can be seen from the ideolo- gy, private practice, religious experience, and intellectual dimensions that are considered re- presenting the totally religious life. Although it is hardly practical to discuss the spirituality definition and its relation, which is a multidimensional concept (Cook, 2004; Hill et al., 2000) including such domains as personal, communal, environmental, and transcendental (Fisher, 2016), the measure of spirituality is more popular in the field of mental health, human existence, and social well-being research. However, this major pro- perty of psychometric related to the existential and religious dimensions is infrequently and less practiced in the scope of education, espe- cially in student achievement and academic behaviour. The spiritual attitude in terms of educa- tional learning and curriculum is a student’s qualification of ability to control him/herself and his/her description of spiritual self- coping. It is associated with the character building in education which is intended to build a moral, democratic, and religious stu- dent as the best outcome in educational learn- ing. The spiritual attitude illustrates the in- crease of vertical interaction and the strong relationship with God (Ministry of Religious Affairs of Republic of Indonesia, 2014, p. 8). The spirituality and spiritual attitude are gain- ing popularity within educational curriculum and academics as the discussions regarding the prominence of spiritual attitude in educa- tion increase. Based on the perspective of a Moslem, spiritual attitude is related to the faith, center- ed on loving submission and closeness to God which can be seen from his/her religious experience, private practice, and social rela- tionship. This study is intended to develop an instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual atti- tude in education with the seven subscales drawn from the Islamic religious term named resignation (tawakkal), sincerity (ikhlas), thank- fulness (syukur), patience (shabr), fear (khauf), hopefulness (raja’), and righteousness (takwa). This study is also intended to test the instru- ment construct validity and estimate the in- strument reliability through quantitative ana- lysis of the data obtained from the research sample. Method This study is a research and develop- ment (R & D) study employing the quantita- tive approach. It is aimed at developing an instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual atti- tude in education for high school students. The research procedure was carried out through four stages, namely: (a) determining conceptual definition, (b) determining opera- tional definition, (c) drawing indicators, and (d) constructing instrument. Population and Sample This research was conducted at 11 public senior high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The population was the grade XI Moslem students, and the sample was 307 participants established by using the cluster random sampling technique by considering students’ focus of study, MIA (Mathematics and natural science) and IS (Social science) as the cluster. The number of the sample re- spondents is shown in Table 1. Table 1. The numbers of sample respondents School Name Amount SMA Negeri 2 Yogyakarta 78 SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta 89 SMA Negeri 7 Yogyakarta 79 SMA Negeri 10 Yogyakarta 61 Total 307 Data Collecting Technique The instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual attitude was developed by using the seven subscales drawn from the Islamic re- ligious terms, and contained 24 indicators. Those indicators were developed into 35 items of questionnaire using three-point alter- native response model (a, b, and c) of the REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 38 – Developing an instrument for measuring... Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi summated rating scale and designed to the multiple-choice form of questionnaires with the variant score of key answer (1 - 3). The conceptual framework of Moslems’ spiritual attitude in this research is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. The conceptual framework of Moslems’ spiritual attitude Notes: MSA : Moslems’ Spiritual Attitude SA1 : Resignation (Tawakal) SA2 : Sincerity (Ikhlas) SA3 : Thankfulness (Syukur) SA4 : Patience (Shabr) SA5 : Fear (Khauf) SA6 : Hopefulness (Raja’) SA7 : Righteousness (Takwa) The Moslems’ spiritual attitude (MSA) has seven subscales. The first subscale is re- signation (Tawakal), which refers to the state of self-resignation to obey in worship and to accept all Allah’s decision. The second sub- scale is sincerity (Ikhlas), the term which refers to being sincere to do a favor. The third sub- scale is thankfulness (Syukur), referring to ad- mitting all Allah’s best creatures and feeling happy to do His order and leaving His prohi- bition. The fourth subsclae is patience (Shabr), referring to the attitude of being consistent to refrain himself from ugliness. The fifth sub- scale is fear (Khauf), being afraid of Allah. The sixth subscale is hope (Raja’), hoping and ask- ing for His grace and forgiveness. The last subscale is righteousness (Takwa), which is the Islamic concept of having self-restraint. Content Validity The developed items in this research in- strument were validated by the five panels of judges and regarded as the expert-judgement. The Aiken’s V formula was used to assess the feasibility of the content validity. The lectur- ers of Educational Measurement and Islamic studies were involved in the panel. All of the experts were selected based on their experi- ences in the field of educational measurement, psychometrics, and Islamic studies. The validators as the experts assess the whole instrument by giving scores to the de- veloped items and give responses to the in- strument’s indicator through comments and suggestions. Subsequently, the validators’ sug- gestions and comments become the basis for making a relevant improvement which will be used to rewrite the items of the research in- strument. Construct Validity Construct validity needs a definition with the specified conceptual circumscription and more focused on particular attributes of the variable than concerned with the values or scores gained from the instrument (Salkind, 2000). Construct validity emphasizes on logi- cal analysis and investigates the relationships of the data analysis based on theoretical con- sideration. Construct validity explains the extent to which performance on the test is consistent with the constructs in a particular theoretical consideration. The present study is also con- cerned with investigating the construct valid- ity for the research instrument to test how the instrument is consistent with the spiritual atti- tudes construct. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis produced a standardized loading fac- tor (SLF) and was determined as the construct validity. Once the SLF value of the certain in- dicator is over 0.30, the indicator is consider- ed as significant (Igbaria, Zinatelli, Cragg, & Cavaye, 1997, p. 290). Another evidence of the construct validity is also determined by the significant t-value (t-value>1.96) which uses the confidence interval of 0.05. Goodness of Fit Statistics The fit statistics of the instrument in this study refers to the fulfilment of two of the three models of fit criteria, i.e. Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA ≥0.08), p-value ≥0.05 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI MSA SA1 SA2 SA3 SA4 SA5 SA6 SA7 REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 Developing an instrument for measuring… - 39 Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi ≥0.90) (Suranto, Muhyadi, & Mardapi, 2014, p. 102). Hair, Black, Babin, and Anderson (2010, p. 656) explain that RMSEA is the fittest statistics to be used in the confirmatory factor analysis. The Goodness of Fit statistics was used in this research to investigate the fit statistics between the primary data obtained from the research sample and the theoretical consideration. The fulfillment of the two mo- dels of fit criteria described that the construct of measurement was suitable to the data. Table 2. Parameter of fit statistics Goodness of Fit Cut off Point Notes Chi-Square (p-value) p-value ≥0.05 Model Fit RMSEA RMSEA ≥0.08 Model Fit Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) GFI ≥0.90 Model Fit Data Analysis The score given from the five experts’ judgement for the total items in the research instrument was subsequently analyzed with the Aiken’s V formula to investigate the con- tent validity of the instrument. The content validity analysis was used prior to the dissemi- nation of the research instrument. The pri- mary data obtained from the research instru- ment were analyzed using Lisrel 8.80 software program. To analyze the quantitative data, two statistical procedures were employed to an- swer the research question. First, the second- order Confirmatory Factor Analysis was ap- plied to obtain the construct validity for the instrument based on the standardized loading factor and to investigate the fit statistics of the instrument construct. Second, the coefficient omega or construct reliability and Average Variance Extracted formula was applied to estimate the reliability coefficient of the in- strument. The fit statistics of the instrument was obtained from the output of the second-order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. RMSEA and GFI were used to determine the instrument fit statistics. Findings and Discussion This study is aimed to develop an in- strument to measure Moslems’ spiritual atti- tude as an inventory model. To achieve these goals, a number of respondents were involved as the research sample to obtain the quantita- tive data based on their responses to the ques- tionnaires. The score gained by using the in- strument was used to test the construct valid- ity and the coefficient of instrument reliability through the data analysis. The construct dimension of Moslems’ spiritual attitude in this study includes seven aspects developed into 24 indicators. The se- ven aspects include resignation (tawakkal), sin- cerity (ikhlas), thankfulness (syukur), patience (shabr), fear (khauf), hopefulness (raja’), and righteousness (takwa). The establishment of the Moslems’ spiritual attitude construction was based on the experts in Islamic studies, psychometry, and educational evaluation, as well as the general practitioners of Islamic education in several high schools. The 35 items of the questionnaire were validated using Aiken’s V formula to assess the feasibility of the content validity. The Aikens’ V index ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 which can be interpreted that all the items which were developed from certain indicators in this research instrument have a good con- tent validity. The validator’s response reveals that the developed instrument in this research is a suitable instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual attitude in education. Confirmatory Factor Analysis The conceptual construct and the ana- lysis result of the developed instrument with second-order CFA are presented in Figure 2. The analysis result of the second order CFA as indicated in Figure 2 shows that the model designed in this study complies with the goodness of fit statistics. The model fit of the instrument is indicated by the RMSEA = 0.032 and Goodness of Fit Index = 0.91. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 40 – Developing an instrument for measuring... Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi Figure 2. The result of CFA second order of Moslem’s spiritual attitude Notes: Q1 : Self-resignation to obey in worship Q2 : Recognizing human’s limitation Q3 : Not to expect any rewards Q4 : Not to be careless in praise Q5 : Not to be hopeless at failure Q6 : Admitting all Allah’s best creatures Q7 : Using God’s grace for good Q8 : Not using the grace for ugliness Q9 : Being consistent with Allah’s commandment Q10 : Being consistent with Allah’s prohibition Q11 : Being consistent to tell the good Q12 : Being grateful for the tragedy and hardship Q13 : Feeling guilty for disregarding Allah’s commandment Q14 : Feeling guilty for breaking Allah’s prohibition Q15 : Being afraid of His threat Q16 : Hoping for Allah’s grace Q17 : Asking for His forgiveness Q18 : Making shalat a priority in life Q19 : Paying for zakat Q20 : Being tolerant Q21 : Being honest Q22 : Rejecting adultery Q23 : Not to use other’s property Q24 : Not breaking promises The value of Standardized Loading Fac- tor as the result of the second-order CFA is presented in Figure 2, while the t-value and R2 of the instrument indicators are shown in Table 3. The result of the second-order confirm- atory factor analysis indicates that the 24 indi- cators in the conceptual construct of the Moslems’ spiritual attitude are considered sig- nificant based on the t-value index. It is shown by the t-value >1.96 in which the low- est t-value is 3.83 (Q5) and the highest is 5.78 (Q21). Another evidence is shown by the value of standardized loading factor based on the result of the second-order CFA which is shown in Table 3. It indicates that the entire indicators have the value of SLF >0.30 (the lowest value of SLF is 0.42 while the highest is 0.79). The evidence of the t-value index and the standardized loading factor in this instru- ment research can be identified as an accept- able construct validity and suitable instrument to measure Moslems’ spiritual attitude in edu- cation. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 Developing an instrument for measuring… - 41 Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi Table 3. The result of second order CFA of Moslems’ spiritual attitude Indicator Loading Factor t-value R2 Notes Q1 0.51 - 0.26 Reference Var Q2 0.79 4.70 0.62 Indicator Fit Q3 0.42 - 0.17 Reference Var Q4 0.67 4.59 0.44 Indicator Fit Q5 0.69 3.83 0.47 Indicator Fit Q6 0.45 - 0.20 Reference Var Q7 0.62 5.13 0.39 Indicator Fit Q8 0.56 4.90 0.31 Indicator Fit Q9 0.44 - 0.19 Reference Var Q10 0.60 4.16 0.36 Indicator Fit Q11 0.65 4.86 0.43 Indicator Fit Q12 0.42 4.34 0.17 Indicator Fit Q13 0.64 - 0.41 Reference Var Q14 0.46 4.19 0.21 Indicator Fit Q15 0.61 4.77 0.37 Indicator Fit Q16 0.46 - 0.21 Reference Var Q17 0.66 4.04 0.44 Indicator Fit Q18 0.51 - 0.26 Reference Var Q19 0.49 5.28 0.24 Indicator Fit Q20 0.48 4.76 0.23 Indicator Fit Q21 0.64 5.78 0.41 Indicator Fit Q22 0.48 4.82 0.23 Indicator Fit Q23 0.54 5.07 0.29 Indicator Fit Q24 0.55 5.14 0.30 Indicator Fit Instrument Reliability Reliability is an essential characteristic of a goodness between the test and the ob- tained scores. Reliability is required to obtain the instrument validity. The investigation of both validity evidence and reliability coeffi- cient can be defined as the complementary aspects of identifying, estimating and inter- preting different sources of variance in the scores (Bachman, Davidson, Ryan, & Choi, 1995). The reliability coefficient of the instru- ment was employed to test the consistency of the measurement and was used as an estima- tion of how much the instrument would give the same result under the same conditions. The estimation of reliability in this research was evaluated with the construct reliability (CR) and the average variance extracted (AVE). The index values of the construct re- liability coefficients are presented in Table 4, and the average variance extracted for the instrument is shown in Table 5. Table 4. The coefficient of construct reliability of the instrument Aspects SLF Errorvar SA1 0.58 0.66 SA2 0.80 0.35 SA3 0.73 0.47 SA4 0.73 0.47 SA5 0.75 0.44 SA6 0.73 0.47 SA7 0.80 0.36 (ΣSLF)2 26.21 ΣErrorvar 3.19 CR 0.890 The coefficient of construct reliability shown in Table 4 for the instrument is 0.890. The CR formula was used to perform the in- ternal consistency of the instrument and to test the indicator in measuring the construct of the instrument. The result of the CR com- putation shows that the instrument has a high reliability index and is considered to have a good consistency to measure Moslems’ spiri- tual attitude in education. Table 5. The coefficient of average variance extracted (AVE) of the instrument Aspects SLF2 Errorvar SA1 0.34 0.66 SA2 0.64 0.35 SA3 0.53 0.47 SA4 0.53 0.47 SA5 0.56 0.44 SA6 0.53 0.47 SA7 0.64 0.36 Σ(SLF2) 3.78 ΣErrorvar 3.19 AVE 0.542 The average variance extracted (AVE) is used to measure the number of variances that can be captured by certain constructs compared to the variances produced by the error of measurement. Table 5 shows that the developed instrument has a moderately good average variance extracted estimation and been proven by the computation of 0.542 (slightly above 0.50) for the entire subscales in the Moslems’ spiritual attitude instrument. Conclusion The construct of Moslems’ spiritual atti- tude is determined by Islamic religious terms. The instrument of the study is an inventory which is defined as a self-report model of the REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 42 – Developing an instrument for measuring... Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi summated rating scale and designed for the multiple-choice form of the questionnaire using three-point (1–3) alternative responses. The instrument contains 35 item question- naire called Moslems’ spiritual attitude scale. The Moslems’ spiritual attitude dimen- sion in education means students’ attitude or personal feeling in self-condition related to their religious experience, ideology, and pri- vate practice in terms of relation with God and interaction with Him. The Moslem’s spir- itual attitude consists of seven aspects as the latent variable and was developed into 24 indicators as the variable observed. . The construct validity of the Moslems’ spiritual attitude scale is considered as moder- ately high according to the standardized load- ing factor (SLF) value. The value of SLF as the result of the second-order confirmatory factor analysis for the 24 instrument indica- tors is above 0.30, ranging from 0.42 to 0.79. The computation result for the coefficient of construct reliability (CR) of the instrument is 0.890 while the average variance extracted (AVE) is 0.542. The fit statistics produces a model fit as indicated by the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.032 (<0.08), and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.91. The result indicates that the construct of the mea- surement is suitable to the data. The model is also suitable for estimating the covariance ma- trix of the population which means that there is no difference from the sample respondents in this study. According to the reseach find- ings, it can be concluded that Moeslem’s spiritual attitude is constructed by seven as- pects, namely resignation (tawakkal), sincerity (ikhlas), thankfulness (syukur), patience (shabr), fear (khauf), hopefulness (raja’), and righteous- ness (takwa). References Azarsa, T., Davoodi, A., Markani, A. K., Gahramanian, A., & Vargaeei, A. (2015). Spiritual wellbeing, attitude toward spiritual care and its relationship with spiritual care competence among critical care nurses. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/ 10.15171/jcs.2015.031 Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., Ryan, K., & Choi, I. C. (1995). An investigation into the comparability of two tests of English as a foreign language: The Cambridge TOEFL comparability study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bidjari, A. F. (2011). Attitude and social representation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011. 10.309 Brown, C. G. (2007). Secularization, the growth of militancy and the spiritual revolution: Religious change and gender power in Britain, 1901-2001. Historical Research, 80, 393–418. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2281.2007.00417.x Bryant, A. N., Choi, J. Y., & Yasuno, M. (2003). Understanding the religious and spiritual dimensions of students’ lives in the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 723–745. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0063 Cook, C. C. (2004). Addiction and spirituality. Addiction, 99(5), 539–551. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00715.x Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fisher, J. (2013). Assessing spiritual well- being: Relating with God explains greatest variance in spiritual well-being among Australian youth. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 18(4), 306–317. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1364436X.2013.844106 Fisher, J. (2016). Selecting the best version of SHALOM to assess spiritual well-being. Religions, 7(5), 45. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel7050045 Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Geranmayepour, S., & Chen, Z. (2014). Measuring Muslim spirituality: Relationships of Muslim experiential religiousness with religious and psychological adjustment in Iran. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 Developing an instrument for measuring… - 43 Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi 8(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org /10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0008.105 Good, M., & Willoughby, T. (2006). The role of spirituality versus religiosity in adolescent psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10964-005-9018-1 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hill, P. C., Pargament, K. I., Hood, R. W., McCullough, J. M. E., Swyers, J. P., Larson, D. B., & Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(1), 51–77. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00119 Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710 Hungelmann, J., Kenkel-Rossi, E., Klassen, L., & Stollenwerk, R. (1996). Focus on spiritual well-being: Harmonious interconnectedness of mind-body- spirit—use of the JAREL spiritual well- being scale: Assessment of spiritual well-being is essential to the health of individuals. Geriatric Nursing, 17(6), 262– 266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197- 4572(96)80238-2 Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305. https:// doi.org/10.2307/249498 Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 283–291. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/070674370905400502 Kusaeri, & Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing. Min, S., & Yun, S. (2015). A study on the differences between spiritual wellbeing and sexual attitude considering the type of university. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S1), 54–58. https://doi. org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/57582 Ministry of Religious Affairs of Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Model penilaian pencapaian kompetensi peserta didik madrasah tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Directorate General of Islamic Education. Moberg, D. O. (2002). Assessing and measuring spirituality: Confronting dilemmas of universal and particular evaluative criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 9(1), 47–60. https://doi.org /10.1023/A:1013877201375 Nikfarjam, M., Heidari-Soureshjani, S., Khoshdel, A., Asmand, P., & Ganji, F. (2017). Comparison of spiritual well- being and social health among the students attending group and individual religious rites. World Family Medicine Journal, 15(8), 160–165. https://doi. org/10.5742/MEWFM.2017.93071 Salkind, N. J. (2000). Exploring research. Michigan, MI: Prentice Hall. Sax, G. (1980). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. California, CA: Wadsworth. Sheridan, M. J., & Hemert, K. A. (1999). The role of religion and spirituality in social work education and practice: A survey of student views and experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10437797.1999.10778952 Shodiq, S., Zamroni, Z., & Kumaidi, K. (2016). Developing an instrument for measuring the faith of the students of Islamic senior high school. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/ 10.21831/reid.v2i2.11117 REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 2018 ISSN 2460-6995 44 – Developing an instrument for measuring... Safa’at Ariful Hudha & Djemari Mardapi Smither, R., & Khorsandi, A. (2009). The implicit personality theory of Islam. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0015737 Soleimani, M. A., Sharif, S. P., Allen, K. A., Yaghoobzadeh, A., Nia, H. S., & Gorgulu, O. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of spiritual well-being scale in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(6), 1981–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016- 0305-9 Suranto, S., Muhyadi, M., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi uji kompetensi keahlian (UKK) administrasi perkantoran di SMK. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/ 10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127 Tanyi, R. A. (2002). Towards clarification of the meaning of spirituality. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(5), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2648.2002.02315.x