Revista Modelo


Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais - Número 12 - Abril/2009                                              23                                                                       ISSN Impresso 1808-4524 / ISSN Eletrônico: 2176-9478

ABSTRACT
Radiation processing is widely used for medical product sterilization and polymeric materials
irradiation. Moreover the use of irradiation is becoming a common treatment for many others
applications, including wastewater, flue gases, and solid waste materials. In order to evaluate the
efficiency of radiation processing on removal of pesticides contamination, high-density polyethylene
(HDPE) packaging were irradiated using Radiation Dynamics Electron Beam Accelerator with 1.5MeV
energy and 37 kW power, and a Cobalt-60 gamma irradiator, Gammacell type, at the rate 3.5 kGy/h.
The chemical analyses of the pesticides were accomplished using a Gas Chromatography associated
with the Mass Spectrometry - GCMS from Shimadzu, Model QP 5000. With 25 kGy absorbed dose, a
total removal of methomyl, dimethoate, carbofuran, and methydathion, and more than 80% removal
of triazine, thiophos, and atrazyne were reached. Lower removal rates were obtained for endosulfan
(54%), chlorpyrifos (69%), thriazophos (79%), and trifluralin (74%).

KEYWORDS: Packaging wastes, pesticides, radiation processing.

Simultaneous Removal of Various Pesticides
from Contaminated HDPE Packaging by
Radiation Processing: Electron Beam and
Gamma Radiation Comparison

Celina Lopes Duarte
Farmacêutica-Bioquímica, Doutora em
Tecnologia Nuclear- Aplicações  pelo IPEN/
USP.
Pesquisadora do Centro de Tecnologia das
Radiações do IPEN
E-mail: clduarte@ipen.br

Manoel Nunes Mori
Químico. Mestre em Tecnologia Nuclear -
Aplicações pelo IPEN/USP.
Pesquisador do Centro de Tecnologia das
Radiações do IPEN

Hiroshi Oikawa
Químico. Mestre em Tecnologia Nuclear -
Aplicações pelo IPEN/USP.
Pesquisador do Centro de Tecnologia das
Radiações do IPEN

Nuclear and Energy Research
Institute, IPEN - CNEN/SP
Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2242 - Cidade
Universitária - CEP: 05508-000 - São Paulo -
SP - Brasil



Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais - Número 12 - Abril/2009                                              24                                                                       ISSN Impresso 1808-4524 / ISSN Eletrônico: 2176-9478

INTRODUCTION

As a consequence of pesticides use
in agriculture, the human population is
constantly exposed to numerous chemical
species present in the environment. The
Brazilian agriculture activities have
consumed about 288,000 tons of pesticides
per year conditioned in about 107,000,000
packaging with a weight of approximately
23,000 tons. The discharge of empty plastic
packaging of pesticides can be an
environmental concern, causing problems to
the human health, to animals and plants if
done without inspection and monitoring [6].
Since the uncontrolled burying and burning
of the waste is no longer allowed, the only
two options remaining is to dispose or to
recycle the packaging, in ways that protect
the environment and human health.

Brazilian Federal law attributes the
disposal responsibility of the pesticide plastic
packaging to the industry. This fact led the
segments to mobilize and create the
National Institute of Processing of Empty
Packaging - inpEV, with the objective of
coordinating this operation [6]. The
pesticides packaging are received in a central
place and are separated in two blocks,
contaminated and non-contaminated. The
contaminated packaging material is
incinerated and non-contaminated is
recycled.

Radiation processing is widely used
for medical product sterilization and
polymeric materials irradiation. Moreover
the use of irradiation is becoming a common
treatment for many others applications,
including wastewater, flue gases, and solid
waste materials. For radiation processing,
accelerators are available, supplying
electron beams in the energy range up to
10MeV, as well as, radionuclide sources Co-
60, which emit 1.17/1.33MeV gamma rays.
Electron beams are characterized by limited
penetration and the entire energy of high-
energy electrons is deposited in relatively
thin layers of material. In the case of gamma
rays, the radiation is able to penetrate
deeper into the materials but the dose rates
are a few orders of magnitude lower in
comparison to electron beam. [5]

The reactive species generated by
the interaction of ionizing radiation with

water (OH radicals, e-aq, and H) have been
successfully applied for organic pollutants
removal in environmental samples and
industrial effluents [2,3,4]. Various research
groups in the world have studied the
degradation of pesticides in different
matrices. [1,7,8,9]. The study of pesticide
chlorpyrifos and ametryne removal using
ionizing radiation were evaluated and
published elsewhere [3,10].

The main objective of this paper is
to study the efficiency of ionizing radiation
on the pesticides removal from commercial
polymeric packaging of high-density
polyethylene COEX type, used in agriculture;
in order to substitute the very expensive
incineration process, by the recycle.

EXPERIMENTAL

Sampling

A mixture of contaminated
pesticides packaging prepared for
incineration process was obtained in bags
of approximately 30 Kg, from the National
Institute of Processing of Empty Packaging -
inpEV.  The samples, without triple rinsing,
were cut in small pieces, weighted in
portions of 50 g and placed in plastic bags,
in two situations dried and with 200 mL of
water.

Radiation Processing

The gamma irradiation was carried
out at room temperature using a Cobalt-60
gamma irradiator, gammacell type, at dose
rate 3.5 kGy/h, and "Perspex" dosimeter was
employed to determine the absorbed dose
of the system. The electron beam irradiation
was carried out with 1.5 MeV of electrons
energy, provided by the IPEN's Electron
Beam Facility (Dynamitron type from
Radiation Dynamics Inc., USA). The
irradiation parameters were 4.0 mm sample
width, 112cm (94.1%) scan and 6.72 m/min
conveyor stream velocity. All the irradiations
were performed in a batch system and the
delivered irradiation absorbed doses were
15 kGy, 25 kGy, 50 kGy, and 100 kGy. The
samples were irradiated in triplicate, and 60
results were obtained in this way.

 Chemical Analysis

After irradiation the polymeric
material was separated from water and was
transferred to glass vessel, and the pesticides
were extracted with 50 mL of hexane/
dichloromethane 1:1 solvent, using an
ultrasonic system per 30 min. The pesticides
concentration, before and after radiation
processing, was determined by gas
chromatography with FID detector
Shimadzu, model GC-FID 17-A, and their
characterization were made by gas
chromatography in association with mass
spectrometry, Shimadzu, model GC-MS QP-
5000 using the following conditions:

• Helium gas carrier,
• DB5 fused capillary columns with

low polar bonded phase,
• Mass detector operation in

electron impact mode (EI), using 1.50 kV of
ionizing voltage and temperature 250oC,

• Interface temperature 240oC and
continuous operation mode (SCAN).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 Chemical Analysis

Through the gas chromatography in
association with mass spectrometry, the
identification of the main pesticides present
in the samples was completed (Fig. 1). The
pesticides with higher concentration were
atrazyne, followed by methylparathion and
thrifluralin. The other pesticides presented
similar concentrations. Naphthalene,
nitrophenol and benzenedicarboxilic acid
are not pesticides, but solvents normally
used in commercial formulations. The main
characteristics of these pesticides are
showed in Table 1.

 Gamma irradiation

The presence of water was
fundamental in the efficiency of this process
as using gamma or electron beam
irradiation. The pesticides removals in
different absorbed doses are presented in
Figure 4 (gamma radiation without and with
water). The removal, using 25 kGy of
absorbed dose, was more than  80% for the
pesticides triazyne,  methylparathion and



Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais - Número 12 - Abril/2009                                              25                                                                       ISSN Impresso 1808-4524 / ISSN Eletrônico: 2176-9478

atrazyne. The lower removal rates for the
same absorbed dose (25 kGy) were obtained
for endosulfan (54%), chlorpyrifos (69%),
triazophos (79%) and trifluraline (74%).
Although these removals were lower than
the others were it can be considered
efficient, because these lower removal rates
were due to the higher concentration of
these pesticides in relation to the others (Fig.
2).

Electron Beam Irradiation

As expected, the presence of water
was also fundamental in the electron beam

Figure 1 - Gas chromatogram showing the main pesticides present in the studied polymeric packaging mixture

processing (Fig. 4). The removal rates were
lower than gamma irradiation, but the
difference was not so significant. Using 25
kGy of absorbed dose, the removal was more
than 80% for Dimetoate, chlorpyrifos,
Carbofuran and more than 60% of
Endosulfan, Triasophos, Methomyl, and
Methylparathion. The lower removal rate for
the same absorbed dose (25 kGy) was for
Endosulfan, Atrazyne, and Triazyne.

The water samples used in this
process were separated from the packaging
mixture after irradiation and analyzed by gas
chromatography. Pesticide contamination of
water was expected, but no residue of

Table 1 - Characterization of the main pesticides identified in the polymeric packaging mixture (8)
Commercial Name

Atrazyne
Carbofuran

Chlorpyrifos

Dimethoate

Endosulfan

Methomyl

Methydathion

Methylparatio

Triazophos

Trifluralin

Action Type
Herbicide- Triazyne
Insecticide, acaricide
Benzofuran Methylcarbamate
Insecticide, acaricide
Organophos phorate
Insecticide, acaricide
Organophos phorate
Insecticide, acaricide
Chlorociclo diene
Insecticide, acaricide
Oxyme Methylcarba mate
Insecticide, acaricide
Organophos phorate
Insecticide, acaricide
Organophos phorate
Insecticide, acaricide
Organophos phorate
Herbicide
Dinitroaniline

Chemical Name
2-chloro-4-(2-propylamino)-6-ethylamino-s-triazine
7-Benzofuranol, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-
methylcarbamate
O,O-Diethyl-O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl)
phosphorothioate
O,O-dimethyl S-methylcarbamoylmethyl
phosphorodithioate
hexachlorohexahydromethano-2-3-4-
benzodioxathienpin-3-oxide
S-methyl-N-(methylcarbamoyloxy)-thioacetimidate

S-2,3-dihydro-5-methoxy-2-oxo-1,3,4-thiadiazol-3-
ylmethyl O,O-dimethylphosphorodithioate
O,O-dimethyl-O-0-nitrophenyl phosphorodioate
O,O-Diethyl O-(1-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)
phosphorothioate
Benzenamina, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-
(trifluoromethyl)-

pesticides in the water was detected, even
after repeated extraction with organic
solvents.

In terms of efficiency, both
radiation sources showed equivalency, and
the main differences are of a practical point
of view. In the case of gamma radiation it is
necessary to use containers for the
irradiation of large volumes at the same
time. However the irradiation time of a
gamma facility is at least several hours, while
in the case of electron beam accelerator, due
to high throughput efficiency, a mobile
system can be used.



Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais - Número 12 - Abril/2009                                              26                                                                       ISSN Impresso 1808-4524 / ISSN Eletrônico: 2176-9478

Figure 3 - Pesticides removal in packaging with and without water, in different absorbed doses, using electron beam accelerator and gamma rays.

CONCLUSION

Ionizing radiation was efficient on
removal of pesticides and other solvents
from the polymeric packaging, but the
presence of water during the irradiation
processing showed to be fundamental. The
pesticide removal yields using electron beam
accelerator were similar to gamma rays.
Some minimal variations were not important
for practical purposes and in the global
efficiency. With 50 kGy of absorbed dose
more than 60% of pesticides were removed
by using gamma rays and also by using
electron beam accelerator.

When a new technology is
proposed for commercial use, some factors
such as applicability and practicality have to
be considered. The initial idea was to
irradiate the polymeric packaging material

REFERENCES

BACHMAN, S.; GIESZCZYNSKA, J. Effect of
gamma irradiation on pesticide residue in
food products.  In: IAEA Ed.   "Agrochemicals:
Fate in Food and the Environmen"t.   Vienna,
International Atomic Energy Agency, p. 313-
315 (1982).

DUARTE, C. L.; OIKAWA, H.; MORI, M. N.;
SAMPA, M. H. O. Present status of
environmental application of electron beam
accelerator in Brazil. In: IAEA ed.
International Symposium On Utilization Of
Accelerators, Vienna, International Energy
Agency,  p. 1-8  (2006).

DUARTE, C.L.; ANDRADE, D.C.; OIKAWA, H.
MORI, M.N. Decontamination of ametryne
HDPE packaging using electron-beam

without destruction. However, grinding
them before irradiation easily optimizes the
process, because in this case a conveyor in
the electron beam facility can be used which
presents high throughput efficiency.
Treatment using radiation processing in
polymeric packaging materials can be
advantageous in comparison with the
incineration method that is a very expensive
process and doesn't allow for recycling of the
high density polyethylene (HDPE).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the
financial support of the Fundação de
Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São
Paulo, FAPESP, (project 03/05631-7).

Figure 2 - Pesticides removal in packaging with and without water, in different absorbed doses, using electron beam accelerator and gamma rays.



Re vis ta  B rasi l e i r a  d e  C i ê n c i a s  A m b i e nta i s  -  N ú m e ro  1 2  -  A b r i l /2 0 0 9                                               27                                                                        I S S N  I m p r es s o  1 8 0 8 - 4 5 2 4  /  I S S N  E l e t rô n i c o :  2 1 76 - 9 478

accelerator. Radiation Physics and
Chemistry, 78, 725-728 (2009).

GETOFF, N.; SOLAR,S.  Radiation induced
decomposition of chlorinated phenols in
water.  Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 31,
121-130 (1988).

HAJI-SAEID, M.; SAMPA, M.H.O.;
CHMIELEWSKI, A.G. Radiation treatment for
sterilization of packaging materials.
Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 76, 1535-
1541 (2007).

INPEV - INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE
PROCESSAMENTO DE EMBALAGENS VAZIAS.
Destinação final de embalagens vazias de

produtos fitossanitários. Disponível em:
http://www.inpev.gov.br.  March, 2008.

KUBESH, K.; ZONA,R.; SOLAR,S.; GEHRINGER,
P. Degradation of catechol by ionizing
radiation, ozone and the combined process
ozone-electron-beam. Radiation Physics and
Chemistry, 72, 447-453 (2005).

HAJSLOVÁ, J.  Pesticides.  In: MOFFAT, C.F.;
WHITTLE, K.J. Eds.  Environmental
Contamination in Food.  London, Academic
Press, 1999, p.215-272.

LUCHINI, L. C.; PERES, T. B.; REZENDE, M. O.
O. Degradation of the Insecticide Parathion
in Methanol by Gamma-irradiation.  Journal

of Radioanalitical and Nuclear Chemistry,
241, 191-194 (1999).

MORI, M. N.; SAMPA, M. H.  O.; DUARTE, C.
L. Study of the degradation of chlorpyrifos
by ionizing radiation. Journal of
Radioanalitical and Nuclear Chemistry, 270
(1), 99-102 (2006).