SIVALHIPPUS PTYCHODUS AND SIVALHIPPUS PLATYODUS (PERISSODACTYLA, MAMMALIA) FROM THE LATE MIOCENE OF CHINA Boyang Sun1,2,4, XiaoXiao Zhang1,2,3, yan Liu1 & Raymond L. BeRnoR⁴ 1Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044. 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039. 3Tianjin Natural History Museum, Tianjin 300201. 4Corresponding Author. College of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Laboratory of Evolutionary Biology, Howard University, Washington D.C. 20059. E-mail: rbernor@howard.edu. To cite this article: Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L. (2018) - Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 124(1): 1-22. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 124(1): 1-22. March 2018 Abstract. Herein, the authors report on skulls, mandibles and postcranial specimens of two species of Chinese Sivalhippus, S. ptychodus and S. platyodus. We frame our description and analyses within the context of newly described characters of the cheek teeth of Hippotherium from the Pannonian C of the Vienna Basin, the oldest and most primitive Old World hipparions. Our report includes original skull, mandibular and limited postcranial ma- terial of Sivalhippus ptychodus and skulls and dentitions of Sivalhippus platyodus from the Paleontological Museum of Uppsala (PMU, Uppsala, Sweden), the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH, New York, USA) and the Licent Collection in Tianjin Natural History Museum (Tianjin, China). The skull, maxillary and mandibular material we attribute to Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus exhibit some primitive features for Old World hipparions and synapamorphies of the face and dentition that unite it with the Sivalhippus clade. Our analysis shows that S. ptychodus and S. platyodus differ significantly from the Cormohipparion occidentale – Hippotherium primigenium clade. Spe- cies belonging to the Sivalhippus clade are found in IndoPakistan (S. nagriensis, S. theobaldi, S. perimensis and S. anwari), Libya and Kenya (S. turkanensis) and Uganda (S. macrodon). We hypothesize that the Sivalhippus clade originated in South Asia where it is earliest represented by Sivalhipus nagriensis, ca. 10.4 Ma and underwent range extension into Africa and China circa 9-7 Ma. Received: August 11, 2017; accepted: October 18, 2017 Keywords: Sivalhippus ptychodus; Sivalhippus platyodus; late Miocene; Evolution; Biogeography. IntroductIon Sivalhippus is a derived lineage of Eurasian and African hipparion horses (Bernor & Hussain 1985; Wolf et al. 2013). This genus first appears in IndoPakistan and appeared later in the late Mioce- ne in China and Africa. Lydekker (1877a) original- ly erected the genus Sivalhippus and the taxon has been recognized by a number of authors since then (Lydekker 1877b, 1882, 1885; Pilgrim 1910, 1913; Matthew 1929; Colbert 1935; Forsten 1968; Hus- sain 1971; Skinner & MacFadden 1977; MacFad- den & Bakr 1979; MacFadden & Woodburne 1982; Hussain & Bernor 1984; Bernor & Hussain 1985; Bernor et al. 2010; Wolf et al. 2013; Sun 2013; Ber- nor & Sun 2015). Wolf et al. (2013) recognized that Sivalhippus is a clade in IndoPakistan (S. nagriensis, S. theobaldi, S. perimensis and S. anwari), Libya and Kenya (S. turkanensis) and Uganda (S. macrodon). However, two Chinese taxa have been referred to the Sivalhippus group and are in need of description within a contemporary morphological and evolu- tionary context: Sivalhippus platyodus and Sivalhippus ptychodus (following Bernor et al. 1990; Bernor & Lipcomb 1991; Wolf et al. 2013). Although some authors such as Bernor et al. (1990) suggested a possible affinity of these Chinese taxa with Sival- hippus (sensu Bernor et al. 1990; Bernor & Lipcomb 1991; Wolf et al. 2013), their formal recognition, characterization and evolutionary relationships have not occurred until this contribution. We identify four skulls and two fragmental mandibles of Sivalhippus ptychodus housed in Mu- seum of Evolution of Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (PMU). In addition, we have recently di- scovered a mandible from Qingyang, China in the Licent Collection housed in Tianjin Natural History Museum. The Qingyang area was discovered by the mailto:rbernor@howard.edu Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.2 French Jesuit priest, Emile Licent (Figure 1 – Loca- tor Map). As a missionary, Licent was sent to Chi- na in 1914 to initiate natural science investigations (Qiu et al. 2013). Early on, Licent worked in the Qingyang area, eastern Gansu Province, and repor- ted his discoveries in the French newspaper La Po- litique de Peking (August, 1920). In October 1921, Licent selected some well-preserved and represen- tative specimens, and sent them to the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Based on this material, Teilhard de Chardin (1922) submitted a re- port to the Geological Society of France under the title: “Sur une faune de mammiferes Pontiens pro- venant de la Chine septentrionale”. Nevertheless, Licent deposited several Qingyang specimens in the Musée Hoang-ho Pai-ho de Tientsin (now Tianjin Natural History Museum, THP). These specimens include hyena material studied by Qiu et al. (1979), giraffe material (lacking any systematic report) and hipparion specimens most of which have been stu- died by Qiu et al. (1987). The mandible described in this manuscript has not previously been reported or described. Its dental characters such as small size, short p2 and triangular metaconid and metastylid are very similar as S. ptychodus. We also recently have recognized specimens of Sivalhippus ptychodus in the American Museum of Natural History, including a complete skull and associated jaw. It was identified as “Hipparion” cf. platyodus by Bernor et al. (1990). However, its facial morphology reveals its identity as Sivalhippus pty- chodus and is the best preserved specimen of this species including complete skull and mandible. Ma- terial that we recognize as belonging to Sivalhippus platyodus include one skull and associated mandible in Uppsala and one skull in Tianjin. Our report leads us to provide the morphological distinction of S. ptychodus and S. platyodus and their geographic and chronologic ranges in China (Fig. 1), and their evolutionary and biogeographic relationships with Indo-Pakistan and African species of Sivalhippus. Systematic Conventions The nomen Hipparion has been used in a va- riety of ways by different authors. We follow cha- racterizations and definitions for hipparionine hor- ses recently provided in Bernor et al. (1996, 1997). The taxon Hipparion has been applied in a variety of ways by different authors. We utilize the following definitions in this work: Hipparionini (or, the common name hippa- rionines) - a tribe of Equidae with an isolated pro- tocone on maxillary premolar and molar teeth and, as far as known, tridactyl feet. Bernor et al. (1996, 2010, 2016) has recognized the following North American, Eurasian and African lineages that they have held to generic rank, including: Cormohipparion, Neohipparion, Nannippus, Pseudhipparion, Hippotherium, Cremohipparion, Hipparion, Sivalhippus, Eurygnathohip- pus (= a senior synonym of Stylohipparion), Probo- scidipparion and Plesiohipparion. These hipparionine lineages have recently been reviewed by Qiu et al. Fig. 1 - Distribution of S. ptychodus (black horse) and S. platyodus (red horse) in China. Mixed color shows coexistence. Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 3 (1987), Bernor & White (2009), Bernor et al. (2010, 2013, 2014, 2015), Armour-Chelu & Bernor (2011), Wolf et al. (2013) and Bernor & Sun (2015). Qiu et al. (1987) and Deng (2012) have held these taxono- mic rankings to the subgenus rank, such as Hippa- rion (Proboscidipparion) pater. We follow Bernor and co-authors recognizing these as multi-species linea- ges warranting genus-level ranking. Metric Procedures Measurements are all given in millimeters and rounded to 0.1 mm. Measurement numbers (M1, M2, M3, etc.) refer to those published by Eisen- mann et al. (1988) and Bernor et al. (1997) for the skulls and postcrania and Bernor et al. (1997) for maxillary and mandibular dentitions. Those specimens that we refer to Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus are listed in Tab. 1 with accompanying information on their geo- graphic location and chronologic age. Tabs 2-6 list standard measurements for specimens (after Bernor et al. 1997) referred to these two Chinese species of Sivalhippus: Tab. 2, skulls; Tab. 3, maxillary dentition; Tab. 4, mandibles; Tab. 5, mandibular dentitions; Tab. 6, metapodial measurements. Tab. 7 provides measurements on key features of Sivalhippus skulls used in our following analyses. We cite these measu- rements in our description of skulls. Character State Distribution Tab. 8 summarizes the characters state distri- bution of Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyo- dus updated from Bernor et al. (1990) including new character state attributes from Bernor et al. (2017). The new additional characters of the maxillary and mandibular cheek teeth follow the definition in Bernor et al. (2017), and are recorded as unordered states (a, b, c, . . . etc.). When a character state is followed by a slash (/), we record a state that as in- termediate (i.e., a/ is intermediate between states a and b). When variable, we record 2 or more states without a / but use of an intervening comma (, - i.e. a, b) in the species hypodigm. These tables have or- dered specimens into morphological groups based on their shared states. Morphological groups have been cross checked by size comparisons and the sta- ge of cheek tooth wear was evaluated so that a given specimen was not excluded from a group because of ontogenetic variation. Abbreviations We use the following abbreviations in this manuscript: Table 1 Accompanying Information on Specimens of Chinese Species of Sivalhippus ID Taxon Quarry SEX BONE SIDE AGE (Ma) PMUM347 S. ptychodus Lectotype Wuxiang, Shanxi 3 skull lt. 7-6.5 PMUM350 S. ptychodus Hequ, Shanxi 3 skull lt. PMUM593 S. ptychodus Hequ, Shanxi 3 skull lt. PMUM3684 S. ptychodus Yushe, Shanxi Male skull lt. 6.5 AMNH143267 S. ptychodus Shouyang, Shanxi Male skull with mandible lt. THP01839 S. ptychodus Qingyang, Gansu 3 mandible lt. 7 PMUM353 S. ptychodus Wuxiang, Shanxi Male mandible lt. 7-6.5 PMUM356 S. ptychodus Xinan, Henan 3 mandible rt. PMUM3691 S. platyodus Lectotype Wuxiang, Shanxi Male skull with mandible lt. 7-6.5 THP22708 S. platyodus Yushe, Shanxi Female skull lt. 6.5 Tab. 1 - Accompanying information on specimens of Chinese spe- cies of Sivalhippus. Table 2 Standard Skull Measurements for Specimens of Chinese Species of Sivalhippus (mm) ID PMUM 347 PMUM 3684 PMUM 350 PMUM 593 AMNH 143267 PMUM 3691 THP 22708 Taxon S. ptychodus S. platyodus M1 102.5 108.8 98.8 97.0 M2 91.2 106.8 99.6 111.9 101.3 111.7 86.8 M3 121.0 97.0 84.6 M4 M5 174.8 M6 379.9 M7 73.0 76.3 77.2 75.3 73.6 82.5 77.6 M8 62.2 62.8 67.1 60.4 66.5 64.7 M9 134.8 136.8 142.2 133.8 149.2 140.0 M10 70.7 61.0 56.5 65.8 51.6 M11 32.8 38.8 29.5 22.0 31.9 29.7 M12 35.7 38.1 31.2 31.0 29.1 31.8 37.3 M13 68.6 66.0 53.4 28.3 56.8 57.6 M14 42.0 34.0 26.8 33.5 35.3 M15 44.7 33.3 45.7 47.2 M16 78.0 77.5 M17 121.0 M18 148.0 117.0 63.0 142.0 M19 181.0 146.0 171.0 M20 M21 M22 62.2 M23 284.8 295.6 292.4 218.3 M24 163.2 M25 89.0 80.7 65.4 89.0 95.5 78.1 77.2 M26 105.0 74.0 93.6 80.7 M27 M28 56.1 54.6 58.1 59.0 55.5 M29 45.8 55.1 45.3 52.5 48.8 M30 0.0 131.6 113.5 M31 0.0 126.6 149.1 M32 50.2 47.0 41.6 44.7 43.5 43.6 M33 55.4 47.6 65.3 60.1 47.6 70.3 M34 60.3 60.7 65.2 55.2 64.1 M35 33.3 27.9 31.0 37.7 32.8 49.7 M36 38.8 29.5 24.3 40.8 28.8 17.5 M37 54.7 37.6 29.8 56.8 24.6 M38 59.1 46.4 57.8 57.4 43.6 Tab. 2 - Standard skull measurements for specimens of Chinese spe- cies of Sivalhippus (mm). Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.4 Ma: mega-annum in the geochronologic time scale. Ages in m.y. are based on radioisotopic analyses or magnetostratigraphic analyses. Measurement Table Abbreviations Sex: M = male; F = fe- male; 3 = unknown. Sex can be defined by the size of a canine tooth, male being large, female being small. Side: lt. = left; rt. = right. Cranial abbreviations: IOF = infraorbital foramen; POB = preorbital bar; POF = preorbital fossa. Element abbreviations in tables: tx = maxillary tooth; tm = mandibular tooth; skull = skull; mand = mandible; MCIII = meta- carpal III. M1-M38 refers to measurements as described by Eisenmann et al. (1988) and Bernor et al. (1997). C1-C52 refers to Characters 1-52 of Tab. 8. Institutional Abbreviations AMNH - American Museum of Natural History, New York GSI - Geological Survey, Calcutta, India. IVPP - Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleo- anthropology; V = vertebrate specimen PMU - Paleontological Museum of Uppsala. M = vertebrate specimen. Currently named “The Museum of Evolution of Uppsala University”. THP - Tientsin Hoangho Paiho, from old name of Tianjin Natural History Museum Terminology and measurements: All follow Sisson (1953), Eisenmann et al. (1988) and Bernor et al. (1997). SyStematIcS Order Perissodactyla Owen, 1848 Suborder Hippomorpha Wood, 1937 Superfamily Equoidea Hay, 1902 Family Equidae Gray, 1821 Subfamily Equinae Steinmann & Doderlein, 1890 Tribe Hipparionini Quinn, 1955 Genus Sivalhippus Lydekker, 1877 Sivalhippus ptychodus (Sefve, 1927) Hipparion ptychodus Sefve, 1927. Hipparion platyodus Qiu et al., 1987 (in part). “Hipparion” ptychodus Bernor et al., 1990. “Hipparion” cf. platyodus Bernor et al., 1990. “Sivalhippus” ptychodus Bernor and Lipscomb, 1991. Lectotype (Bernor et al. 1990): PMUM347, an adult skull with right and left P2-M3, lacking the snout, anterior dentition and most of the cranium, housed in the Museum of Evolution of Uppsa- la University (Fig. 2). Type Locality: Locality 73 (Andersson locality number; Fig. 1), Doujiaogou, Dongcun Village, Wuxiang County, Shanxi Province, China. Locality of new material: In 1920, Licent initiated field work in Qingyang, Gansu and collected abundant vertebrate fossils from two localities, Xingjiagou and Zhaojiacha (Licent 1936). The mandible THP01839 described herein likely comes from one of the- se two localities. Stratigraphy and age: 7- 6.5 Ma. Geographic Distribution (Fig. 1): Yushe County, Shanxi Province; Shouyang County, Shanxi Province; Wuxiang County, Shanxi Province; Hequ County, Shanxi Province; Xinan County, He- nan Province; Qingyang County, Gansu Province. Revised Diagnosis (synapomorphies with Sivalhippus indicated in bold *): Medium-size hipparion with cheek tooth row 134.8 - 142.2 mm. POB relatively long (44.7-50.2 mm in adult individuals); anteriormost limit of lac- rimal placed well posterior to POF (C1G*); naso- lacrimal fossa absent (C2C); orbital surface of lacri- mal bone with reduced foramen (C3B); POF placed anterodorsally on face, anteroposteriorly oriented (C4K*), posterior pocketing slight (C5B), medially deep (C6A), medial wall morphology without in- ternal pits (C7A), peripheral border moderately ex- pressed (C8B), anterior rim faint (C9A); infraorbital foramen inferior to, or encroaching upon anteroven- tral border of the preorbital fossa (C10B); buccina- tor fossa distinctly limited (C11B) and not pocketed (C12A); caninus fossa absent (C13A); malar fossa absent (C14A); nasal notch approximately half the distance between canine and P2 (C15B) Maxillary and mandibular dP1 absent (C16C). Maxillary P2 anterostyle short (C17A*); curvature of maxillary cheek teeth moderate (C18B); maximum cheek tooth height ca. 60 mm (C19C/D); cheek teeth with very complexly plicated fossettes (C20A,B), pre- and postfossette opposing borders separate (C21B), posterior wall of postfossette always distinct (C22B), pli caballins bifid or complex (C23A,B,C), hypoglyphs moderately to deeply incised (C24B,C), protocones short, lingually flattened and labially rounded (predominately C25E*, also G and D; C26A*), protocone always isolated from protoloph (C27B) with no protocone spur (C28C), protocone more lingually placed than hypocone in premolars (C29B) and molars (C30B). Mandibular p2 with short and rounded anterostylid (C31B); Mandibu- lar incisors are not grooved (C32A) and straight (C33B); i3 lateral aspect is elongate, not labiolin- gually constricted (C34A); premolar metaconid may be angular on the distal surface (C35A,C*), molar metaconid angular on the distal surface (C36A,C*), premolar metastylid angular on the mesial surface (C37C*), premolar metastylid spur may be absent or present (C38A,B), molar metastylid angular on Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 5 the mesial surface (C39C*), molars lacking metas- tylid spur (C40B), premolar ectoflexid may or may not separate metaconid and metastylid (C41A,B); molar ectoflexid separates metaconid and metas- tylid after early adult wear (C42 A,B); pli caballinid varies from being rudimentary or single to absent (C43B,C); protostylid varies from being placed on mesio-labial surface of the tooth to being a small pointed projection (C44B,F); protostylid orienta- tion is vertically placed, lying lateral to protoconid band (C45C); ectostylids are absent (C46B); premo- lar linguaflexid varies from being shallow U-shaped to deep, broad U-shape (C47C,D*); molar lingua- flexid varies from being deep, broad U-shape to very broad and deep U-shape (C48D,E*); preflexid morphology varies from having simple to complex margins (C49A,B,C); postflexid morphology var- ies from being simple to very complex (C50A,C); postflexid does not invade metaconid/metastylid junction by anteriormost portion bending sharply lingually (C51A); protoconid enamel band rounded (C52A). Description PMUM347 (Fig. 2A, B) is the Lectotype skull of Sivalhippus ptychodus (Bernor et al. 1990). The skull is medium size with P2-M3, 134.8 mm in length. The preorbital bar is very long, 50.2 mm with the anterior edge of the lacrimal placed less than ½ the distance from the anterior orbital rim to the poste- rior rim of the fossa; nasomaxillary fossa is absent; orbital surface of the lacrimal bone has a reduced foramen; POF is a small, rounded structure, POF ventral border distance to facial-maxillary crest, 38.8 mm; POF pocketing reduced with moderate to slight depth; fossa medial depth is deep, greater than 15 mm; preorbital fossa medial wall without internal pits; preorbital fossa peripheral border out- line moderately delineated around the periphery; anterior rim is present; infraorbital foramen inferior to anteroventral border of POF; buccinator fossa not confluent with a caninus fossa; buccinator fos- sa not pocketed posteriorly; caninus fossa absent; malar fossa absent; nasal notch position cannot be determined. Maxillary dP1 is absent; P2 anterostyle is short; curvature of the cheek teeth is moderate; maximum cheek tooth crown height is estimated to be approximately 60 mm; maxillary cheek tooth fos- sette ornamentation is complex with several deeply amplified plications; pre- and postfossette opposing borders are not linked; posterior wall of postfos- sette is always distinct; pli caballin morphology is double to complex; hypoglyph is moderately deeply incised; protocone is lingually flattened and labially rounded on all cheek teeth; no protocone is con- nected to the protoloph; there are no protoconal spurs; premolar protocone more lingually placed than hypocone; molar protocone more lingually placed than hypocone. PMUM3684 (Fig. 3 A, B) is an adult skull with a complete snout, lacking the posterior cra- nium. Muzzle length is 102.5 mm. P2-M3 is similar in length to PMUM347, 136.8 mm. POB length is slightly shorter than the Lectotype, 47.0 mm. POF Fig. 2 - Skull of S. ptychodus, PMUM 347. A) left lateral view; B) occlusal view of left cheek tooth row. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.6 is shorter than in the Lectotype,47.6 mm and has a dorsal-ventral height slightly less than the Lecto- type, 27.9 mm. The distance from the ventral border of the POF to facial maxillary crest is less, 29.5 mm. As with the Lectotype, PMUM3684 has a POF that is placed high and far anteriorly on the face. The maxillary cheek teeth are lacking dP1, have a short anterostyle, cheek teeth are moderately curved, have an estimated maximum crown height of about 60 mm, fossette ornamentation is very complex; op- posing borders of pre- and postfossette are sepa- rate; posterior wall of postfossette is always distinct; pli caballin is double to complex (on P3 and P4), hypoglyph is only moderately deeply incised; pro- tocone shows some degree of lingual flattening, especially on P4-M3; protocone is moderately flat- tened, but less so than in the Lectotype; protocone is isolated from the protoloph on all cheek teeth; there are no protoconal spurs; premolar protocone is more lingually placed than the hypocone; molar protocone is more lingually placed than the hypo- cone. PMUM350 is a juvenile skull fragment with P2-M2, lacking cranium, anterior nasals and snout (Bernor et al. 1990, fig. 12D from locality 114). POB length is shorter than the Lectotype, 41.6 mm; POF is longer than in the Lectotype, 65.3 mm; and has a dorsal-ventral height slightly less than the Lectotype, 31.0 mm. The distance from the ventral border of the POF to facial maxillary crest is much less, 24.3 mm. The cheek teeth reveal less plication complexity of the pre- and postfossettes, due to the very early stage of their wear. The pli caballins are single on P2 and M2, probably due to their early stage of wear, but bifid on P4-M1. Hypoglyphs are deeply incised. Protocones are lingually flattened on P4-M1, and elongate on the remaining cheek teeth, again probably due to the very early stage of wear (Bernor et al. 1990). PMUM593 (re: Bernor et al. 1990, fig 12C) is an old adult individual with right P2-M3, left P3 (fragmentary)-M3, lacking posterior cranium, nasals and snout. Length of P2-M3 is 142.2 mm; POB length is shorter than the Lectotype, 44.7 mm; POF is longer than in the Lectotype, 60.1 mm; and has a dorsal-ventral height greater than the Lectotype, 37.7 mm. The distance from the ventral border of the POF to facial maxillary crest is greater than in the Lectotype, 40.8 mm. The cheek teeth are heav- ily worn due to the advanced age of the individual. This has resulted in increased rounding of the pro- tocones, except on M3, which has retained a lingual- ly flattened and labially rounded morphology, and simpler enamel plications. AMNH143267 (= AMNH field number 91B979 of Bernor et al. 1990, tab. 4; Fig.4 A, B) is a well preserved skull with an associated mandible of an adult male individual. It is the most comple- te specimen of Sivalhippus ptychodus. Skull muzzle length is 108.8, significantly longer than M3684. P2-M3 length is very similar to the Lectotype, PMUM347, 133.8 mm. POB length is shorter than the Lectotype, 43.5 mm. POF is shorter than in the Lectotype, 47.6 mm and has a dorsal-ventral height Fig. 3 - Skull of S. ptychodus, PMUM 3684. A) right lateral view; B) occlusal view of left cheek tooth row. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 7 lesser than the Lectotype, 32.8 mm. The distance from the ventral border of the POF to facial maxil- lary crest is less, 28.8 mm, slightly less than M3684. The cranial features are identical to the Lectotype. The maxillary tooth characters are similar to those seen in the Lectotype, but the maxillary cheek tooth plications are less complex than those of the Lec- totype (Fig. 4; Tab. 3). Sefve (1927: text fig. 22, pg. 42) figured a right mandibular p2-m1 (occlusal view) of Sivalhippus pty- chodus from Locality 73, Yushe Basin. An unfigured specimen PMUM353 is a left p2-m1 plus mesial portion of m2 that is likely the same individual as text fig. 22 (Fig. 7A herein). Characteristics of the specimen figured by Sefve (1927: text fig. 22, pg. 42) dentition include: premolar metaconid is angu- lar on the distal surface of p3 and p4 and metastylid is angular on the mesial surface; p2-p4 ectoflexids are deep and closely approach the metaconid-me- tastylid isthmus; pli caballinid is rudimentary on p2-p4. The small- to medium length of the cheek tooth row is a character congruent with the maxil- lary dentitions of the Sivalhippus ptychodus hypodigm described above. Sefve (1927) also referred a right mandibular cheek tooth series, PMUM356 with p3- m3 to S. ptychodus with a similar morphology but having ectoflexid being shorter in p4, perhaps due to advanced wear (Fig. 7B). This is a later stage of wear dentition with rounded metaconids and an- gular metastylids, shallow premolar ectoflexids and very deep molar ectoflexids. AMNH143267 (Fig. 5; 7D) is the best preser- ved mandible specimen of Sivalhippus ptychodus, with complete dentition including incisors and canines and the left cheek tooth row. Mandibular incisors are not grooved; they are straight; i3 lateral aspect is elongate, not labiolingually constricted. The p2 anterostylid is short and rounded. Premolar and molar metaconid are rounded; premolar and molar metastylid are angular on mesial surface; premolar- molar metastylid spurs are absent; premolar ecto- flexid does not separate metaconid and metastylid whereas molar ectoflexid separates metaconid and metastylid; pli caballinid is rudimentary or single; protostylid is absent on occlusal surface, but may be on side of crown buried in cement; ectostylids are absent; premolar linguaflexid is shallow U-shaped; molar linguaflexid is deep, broad U-shape; preflexid and postflexid have simple margins; postflexid does not invade metaconid/metastylid junction by ante- riormost portion bending sharply lingually; proto- conid enamel band is rounded. THP 01839 (Fig. 6; 7C; Tab. 4) is a mandibular fragment with left p2 to m3 and right p2 to m2 of a young adult with m3 in an early stage of occlusion. While the mandible is fragmentary, this specimen includes both right and left cheek tooth rows and has been preserved as early adult wear stage. The length of lower cheek tooth row is 146.0 mm which is slightly exaggerated by the slight separation of the teeth’s interstitial spaces; the actual length would be somewhat less. As such, the size is close to the maxillary cheek tooth rows of the skulls described above. The p2 anterostylid is short and rounded; metaconid and metastylid are rounded; metastylid spur is present and strongly developed; ectoflexid is shallow and does not separate metaconid – meta- stylid; pli caballinid is strongly developed and single; protostylid and ectostylid are absent; linguaflexid is deep and U-shaped; preflexid and postflexid have Fig. 4 - Skull of S. ptychodus, AMNH 143267. A) left lateral view; B) occlusal view of left cheek tooth row. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.8 complex margins; postflexid does not invade me- taconid/metastylid junction by the rounded ante- riormost portion bending sharply lingually; proto- conid enamel band is rounded. The p3 metaconid is angular on the distal surface; metastylid is nearly triangular; pre- and postflexid are less complex than p2; other features are similar to p2 except that me- taconid spur is weakly developed. The p4 is similar to p3 except for more complex pre- and postfle- xid margins, and flat protoconid enamel band; it is also the only tooth in the mandibular row with the postflexid invading metaconid/metastylid junction by rounded anteriormost portion bending sharply lingually. The m1 metaconid is subtriangular on the distal surface; metastylid is triangular on the mesial surface; metastylid spur is absent; ectoflexid is deep and separates metaconid and metastylid; preflexid has moderately complex margins; postflexid has simple margins; other features are similar to the pre- molar series. The m2 is similar to the m1 except for having a very complex preflexid margin. The m3 is of an early wear adult having a very shallow ectofle- xid, complex postflexid margin, protoconid enamel band flattened. THP 01839 has very strongly developed pli caballinids on p2-p4 while PMUM353 and AMNH143267 have rudimentary pli caballinids due to its more advanced age. PMUM353 also has pri- ID PMUM347 PMUM350 PMUM593 Taxon S. ptychodus Lectotype S. ptychodus S. ptychodus Tooth P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 M1 28.2 23.1 22.8 20.4 19.4 21.1 31.5 25 23.5 23 22.6 13.5 21.6 23 20.7 21.8 23.5 M2 M3 22.5 23.6 23 21.4 20.9 17.7 20.7 23.9 21.6 20.8 19.4 24.5 25.8 26.5 24.7 23.5 19.8 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 6.2 6.3 6.6 7 6 6.8 7.9 7.9 7.3 7.3 8.9 9.1 8.7 8.9 9.5 M11 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.3 3.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.7 7.1 5.8 6 4.9 ID PMUM3684 AMNH143267 Taxon S. ptychodus S. ptychodus Tooth I1 I2 I3 C P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 I1 I2 I3 C P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 M1 14.7 16.2 16.9 9.2 28.9 24.6 25.3 20.1 21.0 20.2 15.9 15.6 16.6 12.1 27 23 22.6 19.5 19.9 20.9 M2 M3 8.8 7 7.9 6.2 23.2 23.6 23 21.8 20.3 17.7 9.9 8.6 7.9 6.6 21.3 20.9 20.8 19.3 19.8 16.4 M4 M5 33 M6 2 3 2 1 2 M7 3 4 4 4 4 3 M8 3 2 2 3 3 2 M9 1 1 1 1 1 2 M10 7.5 7.1 6.8 6.4 7.2 6.4 5.9 5.9 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 M11 4.5 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.5 4 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.3 ID PMUM3691 THP22708 Taxon S. platyodus lectotype S. platyodus Tooth I1 I2 I3 C P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 P2 P3 P4 M1 M2 M3 M1 15.4 16.2 15.6 12.9 33.1 26.1 25 20.9 21.4 23.4 32.2 24.2 22.4 22 21.5 19.1 M2 M3 9.2 7.1 6.5 7.3 25.1 26.6 26.3 23.5 22.7 19.7 20.1 21.6 21.1 20.6 19.5 15.5 M4 M5 M6 4 2 3 4 5 3 M7 7 7 7 9 8 5 M8 2 3 4 7 6 2 M9 1 1 1 3 2 M10 7 6.1 6.9 6.4 7.1 8.2 7.6 7.3 7.2 7.2 7 8.2 M11 5 4.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.6 3.8 3.4 4 3.7 3.3 3.1 Tab. 3 - Standard maxillary cheek tooth measurements for specimens of Chinese species of Sivalhippus (mm). Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 9 mitive, deeply projecting ectoflexids on the premo- lars whereas THP 01839 has shallow ectoflexids on p2-p4 likely due to its young age. The hypodigm of skulls, maxillary and mandibular dentitions of S. pty- chodus are very similar to each other in their size. Remarks Qiu et al. (1979) suggested that the geologic age of the Xingjiagou and Zhaojiacha faunas origi- nated from the same stratigraphic horizon (Fig. 1). Deng (2006) correlated the Qingyang fauna, Gansu with European MN 12, ca.7 Ma, based on mammal biochronological correlations. The Lectotype of Si- valhippus ptychodus, PMUM347, was collected from the Wuxiang Basin, Shanxi. Another skull PMUM3684 originated from the Yushe Basin, Shanxi. Opdyke et al. (2013) correlated the base of the Mahui Fm., lo- west formation of the Yushe Basin is ca. 6.5 Ma based on magnetostratigraphic data. Tedford et al. (2013) considered that the basal sediments of the Wuxiang Basin to be correlative with the Mahui Fm. because of similarities in their mammalian fauna, except for some subtle differences, such as the presence of Eo- styloceros blainvillei (well known from older Baode Fm. faunas). Tedford et al. (2013) suggested that the age of the base of Wuxiang Basin is probably a little ear- lier than that of Yushe Basin. Therefore the age of PMUM347 and PMUM3684 is circa 7-6.5 Ma. Sivalhippus ptychodus has very long preorbital bar, strong preorbital fossa placed dorsally high and far anteriorly (with long POB), shallow nasal notch, complex upper cheek teeth fossettes, lingually flat- tened and labially rounded protocones, deep hypo- glyphs, double or complex pli caballins, triangular metaconid and metastylid and broad U-shaped linguaflexid. These features are strongly similar to Sivalhippus perimensis from the Siwaliks (Bernor & Hussain 1985; Bernor et al. 1990 and Wolf et al. 2013). Sivalhippus platyodus is similar to S. ptychodus differing in its larger POF dorsoventral dimension. We discuss this matter further below. Fig. 5 - Mandible of S. ptychodus, AMNH 143267. A) left la- teral view; B) occlusal view. Scale bar = 2 cm. ID PMUM353 AMNH 143268 THP 01839 PMUM3691 Taxon S. ptychodus S. ptychodus S. ptychodus S. platyodus M1 M2 94.7 105.7 93.7 M3 69.3 69.1 77.5 M4 63.2 69 M5 132.5 146 M6 M7 47.4 36.0 46 M8 M9 M10 89.9 M11 66.1 58.8 M12 42.9 51.9 40.3 41.8 M13 63.6 71.7 79.5 M14 31.5 29.8 Tab. 4 - Standard mandible measurements for specimens of Chinese species of Sivalhippus (mm). Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.10 Sivalhippus platyodus (Sefve, 1927) Hipparion platyodus Sefve, 1927. Hipparion platyodus Qiu et al., 1987 (in part). “Hipparion” cf. platyodus Bernor et al., 1990. “Sivalhippus” platyodus Bernor and Lipscomb, 1991. Hipparion platyodus Deng et al., 2011. Lectotype (Bernor et al. 1990): PMUM3691, an adult skull with right and left C-M3, housed in the Paleontological, Museum, University of Uppsala, Sweden (Fig. 8). Type Locality: Locality 70 (Andersson locality number; Fig. 1), Wuxiang County, Shanxi Province, China Stratigraphy and age: 7- 6.5 Ma. Geographic Distribution (fig. 1): Yushe County, Shanxi Province; Wuxiang County, Shanxi Province. Revised Diagnosis (synapomorphies with Sivalhippus indicated in bold *): Medium-size hipparion with cheek tooth row 140.0-149.0 mm. POB relatively long (43.6 mm in the Lectotype PMUM3691); anteriormost limit of lacrimal placed well posterior to POF (C1C, primi- tive as in S. nagriensis); nasomaxillary fossa absent (C2C); orbital surface of lacrimal bone with redu- ced foramen (C3B); POF subtriangular shape and anteroventrally oriented (C4D), posterior pocke- ting slight (C5B), moderately deep (C6B), medial wall morphology without internal pits (C7A), pe- ripheral border moderately expressed (C8B), ante- rior rim faint (C9A); infraorbital foramen inferior to, or encroaching upon anteroventral border of the preorbital fossa (C10B); buccinator fossa di- stinctly limited (C11B) and not pocketed (C12A); caninus fossa absent (C13A); malar fossa absent (C14A); nasal notch at or near the anterior bor- der of P2 (C15C) Maxillary and mandibular dP1 absent (C16C). Maxillary P2 anterostyle elongated (C17B); curvature of maxillary cheek teeth mode- rate (C18B); maximum cheek tooth height nearly 60 mm (C19C); cheek teeth with complexly pli- cated fossettes (C20A), pre- and postfossette op- posing borders separate (C21B), posterior wall of postfossette always distinct (C22B), pli caballins mostly bifid or complex (C23A,C), hypoglyphs deeply incised (C24B), protocones short, lingual- ly flattened and labially rounded (predominately C25E*, also G and D; C26A*), protocone always isolated from protoloph (C27B) with no protoco- ne spur (C28C), protocone more lingually placed than hypocone in premolars (C29B) and molars (C30B). Mandibular p2 with modestly elongate anterostylid in the Lectotype PMUM3691 (C31A); Mandibular incisors are not grooved (C32A) and straight (C33B); i3 lateral aspect is elongate, not Fig. 6 - Mandible of S. ptychodus, THP 01839. A) right lateral view; B) occlusal view. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 11 labiolingually constricted (C34A); premolar me- taconid is rounded on the distal surface (C35A), molar metaconid angular on the distal surface (C36C), premolar metastylid angular on the me- sial surface (C37C*), premolar metastylid spur is absent (C38B), molar metastylid angular on the mesial surface (C39C*), molars lacking metastylid spur (C40B), premolar ectoflexid does not separa- te metaconid and metastylid (C41A); molar ecto- flexid separates metaconid and metastylid (C42B); pli caballinid varies from being rudimentrary or single (C43B); protostylid present on occlusal sur- face as an enclosed enamel ring (C44A); proto- stylid orientation unknown (C45); ectostylids are absent (C46B); premolar linguaflexid shallow U- shape (C47C*); molar linguaflexid is a very deep broad U-shape(C48E*); preflexids have complex margins (C49B); postflexids have complex margins (C50B); postflexid does not invade metaconid/ metastylid junction by anteriormost portion ben- ding sharply lingually (C51A); protoconid enamel band is rounded (C52A). Fig. 7 - Occlusal view of cheek to- oth row of S. ptychodus. A) PMUM353, left side; B) PMUM353, right side; C) THP 01839, left side; D) AMNH 143267, left side. Scale bar = 2 cm. Fig. 8 - Skull of S. platyodus, PMUM 3691. A) right lateral view; B) occlusal view of left cheek tooth row. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.12 Description PMUM3691 (Fig. 8) is the Lectotype skull of Sivalhippus platyodus (Bernor et al. 1990). The skull is of an adult male, medium size with snout being 98.8 mm in length. The P2-M3 length is 149.2 mm. The nasomaxillary fossa is absent; orbital surface of the lacrimal bone has a reduced foramen; POB is 43.6 mm in length. POF is 70.3 mm in length with a dor- so-ventral height of 49.7 mm, subtriangular shaped and anteroventrally oriented; POF ventral border ID AMNH 143269 PMUM3691 Taxon S. ptychodus S. platyodus lectotype Tooth i1 i2 i3 c p2 p3 p4 m1 m2 m3 i1 i2 i3 c p2 p3 p4 m1 m2 m3 M1 13.5 14.5 13.5 10.2 24.8 21.2 21.1 20.5 19.8 22.2 12.5 14.1 14.1 11.0 28.7 24.5 23.8 22 22.1 24.6 M2 M3 9.9 8.8 7.6 7.6 9.9 12.3 11.7 11.5 11.3 9.4 9.6 9.6 8.3 8.3 11.9 15.3 14.7 13.8 12.6 10.7 M4 7.8 7.5 11.3 5.7 5.5 5.6 8.4 6.3 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.1 M5 11.3 11.6 10.2 8.4 8.4 7.1 12.6 12.8 12 8.4 8.7 8.4 M6 12.9 13.9 13.5 11.7 11 9.7 13.2 16.8 17.3 12.7 12.1 12 M7 M8 9.9 11 11 9.9 9.5 7.5 10.1 13.3 13.1 11.1 11.2 10.1 M9 11.5 11.4 10.8 9.1 8 6.7 11.8 13.4 12.2 10.2 9.8 8.5 ID THP 01839 PMUM353 PMUM356 Taxon S. ptychodus S. ptychodus S. ptychodus Tooth p2 p3 p4 m1 m2 m3 i1 i2 i3 c p2 p3 p4 m1 p3 p4 m1 m2 m3 M1 26.0 23.7 23.1 22.8 23.9 22.5 10.3 12.2 12.3 9.4 26.1 22.4 21.7 19.0 23.4 23.8 21.6 22.1 M2 M3 9.6 12.2 10.8 12.5 11.4 9.2 9.6 9.7 7.9 7.4 9.9 13.2 12.1 11.6 13.4 14.3 12.4 12.9 11 M4 8.1 8.3 7.1 7.7 7 6.8 6 7.8 7.9 5.8 7.5 8.1 5.8 6.6 6.4 M5 11.6 11.8 10.8 9.5 9.2 6.6 12 11.5 11.3 6.4 11 11.3 7.1 7.9 9.5 M6 11.8 13.6 12 10.1 9.4 8.6 12 13.8 13.3 11.4 15.9 16 13.9 14.4 13.6 M7 M8 9.4 10.9 10.2 9.5 9.1 7.9 9.5 11.7 12.1 10.5 13.7 13.4 12.3 11 10 M9 10.5 11.2 9.5 9.3 9.2 7.1 11.3 11.4 10.8 10.1 13 12.3 10.6 10.1 9 Tab. 5 - Standard mandibular teeth for specimens of Chinese species of Sivalhippus (mm). Fig. 9 - Occlusal view of mandible of S. platyodus, PMUM3691. Scale bar = 2 cm. ID NHMW A4229 FAM 71800 AMNH 19761 PMUM 3691 THP 22708 PMUM 347 PMUM 3684 PMUM 350 PMUM 593 AMNH 143267 Taxon H. primigenium C. occidentale S. perimensis S.platyodus S.ptychodus Country Austria USA IndoPakistan China China China China China China China AGE(Ma) 10.5 10.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 M1 136.6 110.7 116.8 98.8 97.0 102.5 108.8 M9 160.0 140.3 153.0 149.2 140.0 134.8 136.8 142.2 133.8 M32 47.2 39.7 56.2 43.6 50.2 47.0 41.6 44.7 43.5 M33 76.8 71.3 49.2 70.3 64.9 55.4 47.6 65.3 60.1 47.6 M35 56.2 39.3 29.1 49.7 44.9 33.3 27.9 31.0 37.7 32.8 M36 32.7 32.0 35.0 17.5 29.7 38.8 29.5 24.3 40.8 28.8 Tab. 6 - Measurements of key characters of skull for Cormohipparion occidentale (FAM: 71800), Sivalhippus perimensis (AMNH19761) and Chinese species of Sivalhippus (mm), Hippotherium primigenium (Vienna Basin Pannonian C-D, NHMWA4229) standard. Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 13 distance to facial-maxillary crest is 17.5 mm; POF pocketing reduced with moderate to slight depth; fossa medial depth is deep, greater than 15 mm; preorbital fossa medial wall without internal pits; preorbital fossa peripheral border outline is mode- rately well delineated around the periphery; anterior rim is present; infraorbital foramen inferior to an- teroventral border of POF; buccinator fossa not confluent with a caninus fossa; buccinator fossa is not pocketed posteriorly; caninus fossa absent; ma- lar fossa absent; nasal notch position cannot be de- termined. Maxillary dP1 is absent; P2 anterostyle is moderately elongated; curvature of the cheek teeth is moderate; maximum cheek tooth crown height is estimated to be approximately 40-60 mm; maxillary cheek tooth fossette ornamentation is complex with several deeply amplified plications; pre- and post- fossette opposing borders are not linked; posterior wall of postfossette is always distinct; pli caballin morphology varies from double/complex to single (on M2 and M3); hypoglyph is deeply incised; pro- tocone is lingually flattened and labially rounded; no protocone is connected to the protoloph; there are no protoconal spurs; premolar protocone more lingually placed than hypocone; molar protocone more lingually placed than hypocone. PMUM3691 (Fig. 9) mandibular incisors are not grooved; they are straight; i3 lateral aspect is elongate, not labiolingually constricted. The p2 an- terostylid is elongated. Premolar and molar meta- conids are rounded; premolar and molar metastylid are angular on mesial surface except for the right M3; premolar-molar metastylid spurs are absent; premolar ectoflexid closely approaches but does not separate metaconid and metastylid whereas mo- lar ectoflexid separates metaconid and metastylid; pli caballinid is rudimentary or lacking; protostylid is present on occlusal surface often as an enclosed enamel ring; ectostylids are absent; premolar lin- guaflexid is shallow U-shape; molar linguaflexid is a deep U-shape; preflexid and postflexids have complex margins; postflexid does not invade meta- conid/metastylid junction by anteriormost portion bending sharply lingually; protoconid enamel band is rounded. THP22708 (Fig. 10) is a medium-sized adult female skull with a complete snout, lacking the po- sterior cranium. Compared to the Lectotype of Si- valhippus platyodus, muzzle length virtually the same, 97.0 mm; P2-M3 is shorter, 140.0 mm.; POF is shorter, 64.9 mm and has a dorsal-ventral height shorter than the Lectotype, 44.9 mm; distance from the ventral border of the POF to facial maxillary crest is greater, 29.7 mm. As with the Lectotype, Fig. 10 - Skull of S. platyodus, THP 22708. A) left oblique view; B) occlusal view of right cheek tooth row. Scale bar = 2 cm. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.14 PMUM3684 has a POF that is placed high and far anteriorly on the face. The other cranial and dental features are as in the Lectotype. IVPPV8247 is a left MCIII found from Changyin locality, Yushe Basin (Fig. 11). It is very short and robust (Tab. 7), resembles those of typi- cal Sivalhippus (Wolf et al. 2013). Articular facets with MCII and MCIV are large, which show that it has very robust medial and lateral metacarpals. Remarks Sivalhippus platyodus is morphologically similar to Sivalhippus ptychodus (Bernor et al. 1990; Wolf et al. 2013). These two species also overlap in their ge- ographic distribution (Fig. 1). The long preorbital bar, large and subtriangular preorbital fossa, shallow nasal notch, complex upper cheek tooth fossettes, protocones that are lingually flattened and labially rounded, metaconid-metastylid with angular facing border and broad U-shaped linguaflexid of this spe- cies support its referral to the genus Sivalhippus (Fig. 5). Zhegallo (1978) regarded S. platyodus as a subspe- cies of S. theobaldi. Wolf et al. (2013) demonstra- ted that Sivalhippus theobaldi is much larger with very robust metapodials but referred S. platyodus to the genus Sivalhippus because of a number of synapo- morphies: shallow nasal notch, strong subtriangular preorbital fossa, long preorbital bar, complex folds of upper cheek teeth, lingually flattened and labially rounded protocones and triangular double knots of lower cheek teeth. According to known S. platyodus material de- scribed by Qiu et al. (1987) and Bernor et al. (1990), this species has many similarities as Siwaliks hippa- rion horses listed above. The highly robust metapo- dial is another diagnostic character of S. platyodus. Qiu et al. (1987) reported a very short and robust MC III from Yushe Basin (Fig.11). As listed by Wolf et al. (2013), the metapodial specimens of Sivalhip- pus perimense, S. theobaldi and S. anwari are all robust. Qiu et al. (1987) regarded Sivalhippus ptychodus as a synonym of S. platyodus. Later Bernor et al. (1990) reiterated the validity of S. ptychodus, stating that this species is unique compared to other Chinese hip- parionines in its placement of the facial fossa far anteriorly and high dorsally above the plane of the facial-maxillary crest. With our observations herein, the differences between S. ptychodus and S. platyodus are observed on the cranium. The Lectotype Sivalhippus platyodus PMUM3691 (Bernor et al. 1990 Fig. 4A&B) has a shorter POB, longer and deeper POF positioned closer to the facial-maxillary crest. The POF is larger and not positioned high on the face. The maxillary cheek teeth of S. platyodus have persistently labially rounded and lingually flattened protocones as in Si- walik Sivalhippus perimensis (Wolf et al. 2013) and like S. ptychodus. The Lectotype mandible of Sivalhippus platyodus (PMUM3691; Bernor et al. 1990, fig 4C) has rounded premolar and molar metaconids whi- le having angular premolar and molar metastylids; whereas most specimens of S. ptychodus have more angular metaconid and metastylid. However, the mandible AMNH143267 has rounded metaconids both on premolar and molar (Fig. 7D). This makes it difficult to distinguish S. ptychodus and S. platyodus Fig. 11 - Left metacarpal III of S. platyodus, IVPP V 8247. A) cranial view; B) caudal view; C) proximal view; D) distal view. Scale bar = 2 cm. Tab. 7 - Measurements of left MCIII of Sivalhippus platyodus, V8247 (mm). M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 171.3 165.4 27.0 19.4 36.3 24.2 31.9 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 9.8 5.6 37.8 34.9 24.0 20.4 23.7 Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 15 based on mandibular cheek teeth alone. The man- dibular cheek teeth of Sivalhippus ptychodus also have p2s with shorter anterostylids that are seen on all of our specimens: it is a stable feature. Whereas the Lectotype of S. platyodus, M3691 has elongated anteorstylid on p2 it is shorter on specimens of S. ptychodus. The specimens of Sivalhippus perimensis, AMNH19466 and AMNH19761 crania are larger than both S. ptychodus and S. platyodus (Wolf et al. 2013). Chinese species of Plesiohipparion and Probo- scidipparion and African Eurygnathohippus evolve even more extreme angular metaconids and metastylids on the cheek teeth (Bernor & Sun 2015). dIScuSSIon Sivalhippus ptychodus shares with Sivalhippus peri- mensis a POF that is placed dorso-ventrally high and far anterior on the face. Other lineages of hippa- rionine horses have long preorbital bars and large, dorsoventrally extensive POF such as is found in S. platyodus: Cormohipparion spp. and Hippotherium spp (Bernor et al. 1997, 2011; Bernor & White 2009). Most species of Cormohipparion group are distribu- ted in North America. Cormohipparion was the linea- ge that populated Eurasia and Africa and is known from Sinap, Turkey, (Bernor et al. 2003), Bou Hanifia, Algeria (Bernor & White 2009) and Ethiopia (Ber- nor et al. 2010; 2017). Hippotherium was a successful clade that ranged from Central Europe eastward to the Balkans and Turkey including the following taxa: Hippotherium sp. (Vienna Basin, Pannonian C; Bernor et al. 2017), Hippotherium primigenium (Central Europe, Bernor et al. 1988; 1997), Hippotherium bra- chypus (Greece and Iran, Koufos 1987; Bernor et al. 2016), Hippotherium intrans (Hungary, Kretzoi 1983; Bernor et al. 2004); Hippotherium microdon (Hungary, Kormos 1914), Hippotherium kammerschmitti (Ger- many, Kaiser et al. 2003) and Hippotherium malpassi (Italy, Bernor et al. 2011). Chinese hipparion species similar to Hippotherium include “Hippotherium” weiho- ense and “Hippotherium” chiai (Qiu et al. 1987). Bernor and White (2009) analyzed key me- asurements for distinguishing clades of Old World Hipparions: M1 = snout length; M9 = cheek tooth row length; M32 = POB length; M33 = POF length; M35 = POF dorsoventral height; M36 = distan- ce from ventral border of POF to facial-maxillary crest. Table 6 provides the key measurements that we use to compare North American Cormohipparion occidentale (FAM 71800), Siwalik Sivalhippus perimensis (AMNH19761) and China Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus specimens discussed herein. We use the Hippotherium primigenium from Inzersdorf (NHMWA4229) as our standard and plot the log10 Fig. 12 - Ratio diagrams of skull measurements of Sivalhippus and other hipparion horses. Log10 Standard is Inzersdorf hip- parion, Hippotherium primigenium (zero line). A) Critical measurements on FAM71800 Cormohipparion oc- cidentale, Sivalhippus perimensis and Chinese Sivalhippus, Log10 Ratios. B) Critical skull measurements on FAM71800 Cor- mohipparion occidentale, Sivalhippus perimensis and Sivalhippus ptychodus. C) Critical skull measurements in Cormohipparion occidentale, Sivalhippus perimense and Sivalhippus platyodus. Me- asurement numbers: M9, upper cheek teeth length; M32, distance between the orbit and the preorbital fossa; M33, length of the preorbital fossa; M35, height of the preorbital fossa; M36, distance between the preorbital fossa and the facial crest. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.16 ratios for the comparative samples (Fig. 12 A-C). Fig. 12 plots skulls of Chinese specimens of Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus compared to North American C. occidentale (FAM: 71800 following Bernor et al. 2003; Bernor & Whi- te 2009), Siwalik S. perimensis (AMNH19761) with Pannonian D-E H. primigenium from Inzersdorf (NHMWA4229) being the log10 standard. Fig. 12A plots all Chinese Sivalhippus together with North American C. occidentale and Siwalik S. perimensis. Fig. 12B plots C. occidentale and S. perimensis compared to Chinese Sivalhippus ptychodus only and Fig. 12C plots C. occidentale and S. perimensis compared to Sivalhip- pus platyodus only. A number of clear morphological distinctions can be made between the taxa under consideration (Tab. 6 and Fig. 12A-C). The H. primi- genium standard from Inzersdorf, Austria is the lar- gest taxon with the longest cheek tooth row (M9), S. perimensis has a slightly shorter tooth row and all Chinese Sivalhippus have shorter cheek tooth rows than both. Siwalik S. perimensis is the most derived taxon in the length of the POB (M32 = 56.2mm) and restriction of the POF high on the face (M35 = 29.1, M36 = 35.0 mm). Figures 12B and 12C exhibit clear distinctions between Sivalhippus ptychodus (Fig. 12B) and S. platyodus (Fig. 12C): S. ptychodus has all measurements for POF height (M35) falling below North American C. occidentale as is found for Siwa- lik S. perimensis; S. platyodus has all measurements for POF height falling above that for C. occidenta- le. Lectotype of Sivalhippus ptychodus (PMUM347) is of only moderate size (M9 = 134.8 mm) but has a very long POB (M32 = 50.2 mm) comparing closely with S. perimensis, albeit being smaller. Bernor et al. (1988; 1996) and Woodburne (2007) argued that Cormohipparion was the ancestral group from which Old World hipparion evolved. Cormohipparion occidentale was believed to be the ancestral type for Old World hipparionine horses (Bernor et al. 2003). Cormohipparion sinapensis (Sinap, Tab. 8 - Summary character state distributions of Sivalhippus ptychodus and Sivalhippus platyodus skulls, maxillary and mandibular dentitions. Taxa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PMUM347 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A C A B PMUM3684 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A B C A B PMUM350 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A PMUM593 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A PMUM353 PMUM356 THP01839 AMNH143267 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A C C A B PMUM3691 C C B D B B A B A B B A A A C C B B THP22708 C B D B B A B A B B A A A C C B B Taxa 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 PMUM347 C/D A B B A,C C E A B C B B PMUM3684 C/D A B B A,C C E A B C B B PMUM350 B A,B B D,E PMUM593 B G,E PMUM353 B C PMUM356 C C THP01839 B C C AMNH143267 A B B A,B B E A B C B B B A B A A A PMUM3691 C A B B A,C B E A B C B B A A B A A A THP22708 C A B B A,C B E A B C B B Taxa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PMUM347 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A C A B PMUM3684 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A B C A B PMUM350 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A PMUM593 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A PMUM353 PMUM356 THP01839 AMNH143267 G C B K B A A B A B B A A A C C A B PMUM3691 C C B D B B A B A B B A A A C C B B THP22708 C B D B B A B A B B A A A C C B B Taxa 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 PMUM347 C/D A B B A,C C E A B C B B PMUM3684 C/D A B B A,C C E A B C B B PMUM350 B A,B B D,E PMUM593 B G,E PMUM353 B C PMUM356 C C THP01839 B C C AMNH143267 A B B A,B B E A B C B B B A B A A A PMUM3691 C A B B A,C B E A B C B B A A B A A A THP22708 C A B B A,C B E A B C B B Taxa 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 PMUM347 PMUM3684 PMUM350 PMUM593 PMUM353 C B C B B C B B D A A A A PMUM356 C B C B A B C F C B D E A A A A THP01839 C A C B A A B B B C D B,C C A A AMNH143267 C B C B A B B B B C D A A A A PMUM3691 C B C B A B B A B C E B B A A THP22708 Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 17 Turkey 10.8 Ma) and Hippotherium primigenium (Cen- tral Europe, ca. 11.4-11.0 Ma.) are the two oldest and most primitive Old World hipparion lineages; C. occidentale occurred in Indopakistan, Turkey and Africa while H. primigenium evolved originally in Central Europe (Bernor et al. 2017). In these linea- ges the POF is characterized as being large, dorso- ventrally and anteroposteriorly extensive, medially deep and posteriorly pocketed with accompanying long POB. Species of these primitive lineages also have a POF positioned closer to the facial-maxillary crest. Morphometric analysis by Bernor et al. (2003) and phylogenetic analysis of Woodburne (2007) showed that North American early late Miocene C. matthewi and C. occidentale were sister taxa and for- med the most derived clade within the American Cormohipparion. Woodburne (2009) considered that another Cormohipparion, Cormohipparion sp. from the Punchbowl Formation, California, was the likely source of the Old World “Hipparion” Datum and ra- diation. This was supported by Bernor et al.’s (2017) analysis of Vienna Basin Pannonian C hipparions. The Siwaliks, Indopakistan, underwent a re- gional evolutionary radiation of the genus Sivalhip- pus (Wolf et al. 2013). The oldest occurring member of the Sivalhippus clade is Sivalhippus nagriensis which occurred 10.5-9.3 Ma. The very large and very ro- bust species Sivalhippus theobaldi ranged in age from 9.3 to 7.8 Ma. The large and robust species, Sival- hippus perimensis ranged in age from 8.5-7.3 Ma. The last locally occurring Potwar Plateau species, also large, S. anwari ranged from 7.4-7.2 Ma. In China, Sivalhippus cf. theobaldi is reported from Yunan, ca. 8.2-7.2 Ma (Sun 2013). Sivalhippus ptychodus occurred in Qingyang, Gansu ca. 7 Ma, and in Yushe and Wu- xiang Basins, Shanxi in 7-6.5 Ma. Sivalhippus platyo- dus also occurred in the Yushe and Wuxiang Basins, Shanxi in 7-6.5 Ma and the Wulanhua area circa 7 Ma. Sivalhippus cf. theobaldi occured in Myanmar ca. 8 Ma and Yuanmou and Lufeng, Yunnan, Chi- na between 8 and 7 Ma (Qi et al. 2006; Sun 2013). Flynn and Qi (1982) argued the age of Lufeng fau- na was 8 Ma. Sivalhippus also occured in Africa: in Uganda S. macrodon is circa 9 Ma, and is likely re- lated to Siwalik S. theobaldi; S. turkanensis occurs at Lothagam, ca. 6.5 Ma (Bernor & Harris 2003) and plausibly Sahabi, circa 7 Ma (Bernor et al. 2010) and is related to Sivalhippus perimensis (Fig. 13).The phylo- genetic analysis of Wolf et al. (2013) hypothesized that S. platyodus was the sister taxon of Siwalik S. theobaldi. However, we believe that eventhough the type specimen of Siwalik S. nagriensis is fragmentary, it is morphologically closer to S. platyodus than either S. theobaldi or S. ptychodus. Both S. nagriensis and S. platyodus have dorsoventrally extensive, subtriangu- lar POF placed close to the facial-maxillary crest. We believe that at least these two species share a very close relationship. On the other hand, S. ptycho- dus is most similar to Siwalik S. perimensis. Although S. ptychodus and S. platyodus have overlapping geo- graphic and choronologic distributions in China, they likely represent two separate dispersal events of hipparion horse from Indopakistan (Fig. 13). concluSIonS Sivalhippus ptychodus has derived features inclu- ding a long POB, strongly developed POF placed dorsally high and far anteriorly shallow nasal notch, complexly plicated upper cheek tooth fossettes, lin- gually flattened and labially rounded protocones, variably occurring pli caballinids, rounded to trian- gular metaconids, triangular metastylid and broad Fig. 13 - Geological distribution of Sivalhippus lineages in Indo- pakistan, China and Africa showing their phylogenetic relation and dispersal events. Sivalhippus nagriensis lineage (S. nagriensis and S. platyodus) in black; Sivalhippus theobaldi lineage in red (S. theobaldi , S. macrodon, and S. cf. theobaldi); Sivalhippus perimensis lineage (S. perimensis, S. turkanensis, S. anwari and S. ptychodus) in blue. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.18 U-shaped linguaflexid on the mandibular molars typical for the genus Sivalhippus. Sivalhippus ptychodus differs from S. platyodus in having a POF placed high on the face with a shorter POF dorsoventral height. Sivalhippus ptychodus is a valid species and not a syno- nym of S. platyodus. The facial morphology of S. ptychodus most resembles that of Siwalik S. perimensis and to a limited extent, S. turkanensis, whereas that of S. platyodus is more similar to Sivalhippus nagriensis. Sivalhippus spp. likely extended its range from South Asia into China between 9 and 7 Ma. Acknowledgements: We thank Prof. Deng Tao for his com- ments. We thank Dr. Jan-Ove R. Ebbestad and Dr. Benjamin Kear of Museum of Evolution of Uppsala University, Dr. Meng Jin and Ms Judy Galkin of American Museum of Natural History for providing the facilities and opportunity for studying the Chinese hipparionine material in their care. We thank Gao Wei for his photographs and Su Dan for preparation of the specimen. We thank Sun Danhui for her support on photography and measurement work of metacarpal specimen. We thank editor Prof. Lorenzo Rook, reviewer Dr. Wang Shiqi and two anonymous reviewers for their review and important comments for our manuscript. This work was supported by Natio- nal Natural Science Foundation of China (41430102 and 41402003), the Strategic Priority Cultivating Research Program, CAS (XDPB05), and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZ- DY-SSW-DQC022). Sun also acknowledges funding from the China Scholarship Council for 1 year research in the Bernor Lab at Howard University. Bernor wishes to acknowledge research funding by NSF EAR grants 8806645, 0125009, 1113175, 1558586 and BCS0321893 (to F.C. Howell and T.D. White) which provided data and background investigations critical to this manuscript. RefeRences Armour-Chelu M. & Bernor, R. L. (2011) - Equidae. In: Har- rison T. (Ed) - Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context: 295-326. Springer Neth- erlands. Bernor R.L., Armour-Chelu M., Gilbert H., Kaiser T.M. & Schulz E. (2010) - Equidae. In: Werdelin L. & Sanders W.L. (Eds) - Cenozoic mammals of Africa: 685-721. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. Bernor R.L., Ataabadi M.M., Meshida K. & Wolf D. (2016) - The Maragheh hipparions, late Miocene of Azarbaijan, Iran. Palaeobiodiv. Palaeoenviron., 96(3): 453-488. Bernor R.L., Coillot T. & Wolf D. (2014) - Phylogenetic sig- natures in the juvenile skull and dentition of Olduvai Eurygnathohippus cornelianus (Mammalia: Equidae). Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 120(2): 243-252. Bernor R.L., Gilbert H., Semprebon G.M., Simpson S. & Semaw S. (2013) - Eurygnathohippus woldegabrieli sp. nov. (Perissodactyla, Mammalia), from the Middle Pliocene of Aramis, Ethiopia. J. Vert. Paleont., 33(6): 1472-1485. Bernor R.L., Göhlich U.B., Harzhauser M. & Semprebon G.M. (2017) - The Pannonian C hipparions from the Vi- enna Basin. Palaegeogr., Palaeoclim., Palaeoecol., 476, 28-41. Bernor R.L. & Harris J.M. (2003) - Systematics and evolution- ary biology of the Late Miocene and Early Pliocene hip- parionine equids from Lothagam, Kenya. In: Leakey M. & Harris J.M. (Eds) - Lothagam: The dawn of humanity in eastern Africa: 387-440. Columbia University Press: New York. Bernor R.L. & Hussain S.T. (1985) - An assessment of the systematic, phylogenetic and biogeographic relation- ships of Siwalik hipparionine horses. J. Vert. Paleontol., 5: 32-87. Bernor R. L., Kaiser T. M., Nelson S. V. & Rook L. (2011) - Systematics and Paleobiology of Hippotherium malpas- sii n. sp. (Equidae, Mammalia) from the latest Miocene of Baccinello V3 (Tuscany, Italy). Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital., 50(3): 175-208. Bernor R.L., Kordos L., Rook L., Agustí J., Andrews P., Ar- mourChelu M., Begun D.R., Cameron D.W., Damuth J., DaxnerHöck G., de Bonis L., Fejfar O., Fessaha N., For- telius M., Franzen J., Gasparik M., Gentry A., Heissig K., Hernyak N., Kaiser T., Koufos G.D., Krolopp E., Jánossy D., Llenas M., Meszáros L., Müller P., Renne P., Rocek Z., Sen S., Scott R., Szyndlar Z., Topál Gy., Ungar P.S., Utescher T., Van Dam J.A., Werdelin L. & Ziegler R. (2004) - Recent advances on multidisciplinary research at Rudabánya, Late Miocene (MN9), Hungary: A com- pendium. Palaeontographica Italica, 89: 3-36. Bernor R.L., Kovar J., Lipscomb D., Rögl F. & Tobien H. (1988) - Systematic, Stratigraphic and Paleoenvironmen- tal Contexts of First Appearing Hipparion in the Vienna Basin, Austria. J. Vert. Paleontol., 8(4): 427-452. Bernor R.L., Koufos G.D., Woodburne M.O. & Fortelius M. (1996) - The evolutionary history and biochronology of European and Southwest Asian Late Miocene and Plio- cene hipparionine horses. In: Bernor R.L., Fahlbusch V. & Mittmann H-W. (Eds) - The Evolution of Western Eurasian Later Neogene Faunas: 307-338. New York: Columbia University Press. Bernor R.L. & Lipscomb D. (1991) - The Systematic position of “Plesiohipparion” aff. huangheense (Equidea, Hippari- onini) from Gülyazi, Turkey. Mitt. Bayer. Staatsslg. Paläont. Hist. Geol., 31: 107-123. Bernor R.L., Meshida K.& Sun B. (2015) - Phylogenetic sig- natures in the juvenile skulls and cheek teeth of Plei- stocene Proboscidipparion sinense, China. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 121(2): 255-264. Bernor R.L., Qiu Z.X. & Hayek L-A. (1990) - Systematic Re- vision of Chinese Hipparion species described by Sefve, 1927. Am. Mus. Novit., 2984: 1-60. Bernor R.L., Scott R.S., Fortelius M., Kappelman J. & Sen S. (2003) - Systematics and Evolution of the Late Miocene Hipparions from Sinap, Turkey. In: Fortelius M., Kap- pelman J., Sen S. & Bernor R.L. (Eds) - The Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey: 220 -281. Columbia University Press: New York. Bernor R.L. & Sun B.Y. (2015) - Morphology through ontog- eny of Chinese Proboscidipparion and Plesiohipparion and observations on their Eurasian and African relatives. Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 19 Vert. PalAsiat., 53(1): 73-92. Bernor R.L., Tobien H., Hayek L-A.C. & Mittmann H-W. (1997) - Hippotherium primigenium (Equidae, Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Höwenegg (Hegau, Germa- ny). Andrias, 10: 1-230. Bernor R.L. & White T. D. (2009) - Systematics and biogeog- raphy of “Cormohipparion” africanum, early Vallesian (MN 9, ca. 10.5 Ma) of Bou Hanifia, Algeria. Papers on Ge- ology, Vertebrate Paleontology, and Biostratigraphy in Honor of Michael O. Woodburne. Bull., Mus. Northern Arizona, 65: 635-658. Colbert E.H. (1935) - Siwalik mammals in the American Mu- seum of Natural History. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., 26: 1-401. Deng T. (2006) - Chinese Neogene mammal biochronology. Vert. PalAsiat., 44(2): 143-163. Deng T. (2012) - A skull of Hipparion (Proboscidipparion) sinense (Perissodactyla, Equidae) from Longdan, Dongxiang of northwestern China: addition to the Early Pleistocene Longdan mammalian fauna (3). Vert. PalAsiat., 50(1): 74-84. Deng T., Liang Z., Wang S.Q., Hou S.K. & Li Q. (2011) - Discovery of a Late Miocene mammalian fauna from Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia, and its paleozoogeo- graphical significance. Chin. Sci. Bull., 56(6): 526-534. Eisenmann V., Alberdi M.T., De Giuli C. & Staesche U. (1988) - Studying fossil horses, volume I: methodology: 1-71. Leiden, E.J. Brill. Flynn L.J. & Qi G.Q. (1982) - Age of the Lufeng, China, homi- noid locality. Nature, 298(5876): 746-747. Forsten A. (1968) - Revision of the Palearctic Hipparion. Acta. zool. fennica., 119: 1-134. Hussain S.T. (1971) - Revision of Hipparion (Equidae, Mam- malia) from the Siwalik Hills of Pakistan and India. Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., Math. Naturwiss. Kl. 147: 1-68. Hussain S.T. & Bernor R.L. (1984) - Evolutionary History of Siwalik Hipparions. Cour. Forschungsinst. Senckenb., 69: 181-187. Kaiser T. M., Bernor R. L., Scott R. S., Franzen, J. L. & Solou- nias N. (2003) - New interpretations of the systematics and palaeoecology of the Dorn-Dürkheim 1 hipparions (Late Miocene, Turolian Age [MN11]), Rheinhessen, Germany. Paleobiodivers. Paleoenviron., 83(1): 103-133. Kretzoi M. (1983) - Gerinces Indexfajok Felsö-neozói réteg- tanunkban Hipparion. Magyr Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése AZ. 1981. Évröl: 513-521. Kormos T. (1914) - Az 1913. évben végzett ásatásaim eredmé- nyi. Különlenyomat A Magy. - Kiraly Földtani Intezet 1913, Evi. Jelentesebol.: 506-523. Koufos G.D. (1987) - Study of the Pikermi hipparions. Bull. Mus. nat. Hist. nat. Paris, (4e sér., 9, sect. 3): 327-363. Licent E. (1936) - Vingt deux anneés d’exploration dans le Nord de la Chine, en Mandchourie, en Mongolie et au Bas-Tibet (1914-1935). Publ. Musée Hoang Ho Pai Ho, 39: 1-41. Lydekker R. (1877a) - Notices of new and other vertebrata from Indian Tertiary and Secondary Rocks. Rec. Geol. Surv. India., 10: 30-43. Lydekker R. (1877b) - Notices of Siwalik mammals. Rec. Geol. Surv. India.,11: 64-104. Lydekker R. (1882) - Indian Tertiary and post-Tertiary verte- brata. Siwalik and Narbada Equidae. Palaeontologia Indica (X)II: 67-98. Lydekker R. (1885) - Catalogue of the remains of Siwalik Ver- tebrata contained in the geological department of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Part 1: Mammalia. Govern- ment Printing, Calcutta, India, 116 pp. MacFadden B.J. & Bakr A. (1979) - The horse Cormohipparion theobaldi from the Neogene of Pakistan, with comments on Siwalik hipparions. Palaeontology, 22: 439-447. MacFadden B.J. & Woodburne M.O. (1982) - Systematics of the Neogene Siwalik hipparions (Mammalia, Equidae) based on cranial and dental morphology. J. Vert. Paleon- tol., 2: 185-218. Matthew W.D. (1929) - Critical observations upon Siwalik mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 61:427-560. Opdyke N.D., Huang K-N. & Tedford R.H. (2013) - The pa- leomagnetism and magnetic stratigraphy of the late Ce- nozoic sediments of the Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province, China. In: Tedford R.H., Qiu Z.X. & Flynn L.J. (Eds) - Late Cenozoic Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province, China: geology and fossil mammals, volume 1: history, geology, and magnetostratigraphy: 69-78. Dordrecht, Springer. Pilgrim G.E. (1910) - Notices of new Mammalian genera and species from the Tertiaries of India. Rec. Geol. Surv. In- dia., 40: 63-71. Pilgrim G.E. (1913) - Correlation of the Siwaliks with mam- mal horizons of Europe. Geol. Surv. India., 43: 264-326. Qi G.Q., Dong W., Zheng L., Zhao L.X., Gao F., Yue L.P. & Zhang Y.X. (2006) - Taxonomy, age and environment status of the Yuanmou hominoid. Chin. Sci. Bull., 51(6): 704-712. Qiu Z.X., Huang W.L. & Guo Z.H. (1987) - The Chinese hip- parionine fossils. Palaeontol. Sin. New Ser C., 25: 1-243. Qiu Z.X., Huang W.L. & Guo Z.H. (1979) - Hyaenidae of the Qingyang (K’ing Yang) hipparion fauna. Vert. PalAsiat., 17(3): 200-221. Qiu Z.X. & Tedford R.H. (2013) - History of scientific ex- ploration of Yushe Basin. In: Tedford R.H., Qiu Z.X. & Flynn L.J. (Eds) - Late Cenozoic Yushe Basin, Shanxi Province, China: geology and fossil mammals, volume 1: history, geology, and magnetostratigraphy: 7-34. Dor- drecht, Springer. Sefve I. (1927) - Die Hipparionen Nord-Chinas. Palaeontol. Sin. Series C, 4(2): 1-93. Sisson S. (1953) - The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia. W. B. Saunders Company, 972 pp. Skinner M.F. & MacFadden B.J. (1977) - Cormohipparion. gen. n. (Mammalia, Equidae) from the North American Mio- cene (Barstovian-Clarendonian). J. Paleontol., 51: 912- 926. Sun B.Y. 2013. The Miocene Hipparion (Equidae, Perissodacty- la) from Shihuiba Locality, Lufeng, Yunnan. Vert. PalA- siat., 51(2): 141-161. Teilhard de Chrdin P. (1922) - Sur une faune de Mammifères Pontiens provenant dela Chine septentrionale. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris: 979-981. Sun B., Zhang X., Liu Y. & Bernor R.L.20 Tedford R.H., Qiu Z.X. & Ye J. (2013) - Cenozoic geology of the Yushe Basin. In: Tedford R.H., Qiu Z.X. & Flynn L.J. (Eds) - Late Cenozoic Yushe Basin, Shanxi Prov- ince, China: geology and fossil mammals, volume 1: history, geology, and magnetostratigraphy: 35-68. Dor- drecht, Springer. Wolf D., Bernor R.L. & Hussain S.T. (2013) - A Systematic, biostratigraphic, and paleobiogeographic reevaluation of the Siwalik hipparionine horse assemblage from the Potwar Plateau, Northern Pakistan. Palaeontographica, 300: 1-118. Woodburne M.O. (2007) - Phyletic diversification of the Cor- mohipparion occidentale complex (Mammalia; Perissodac- tyla, Equidae), Late Miocene, North America, and the origin of the Old World Hippotherium datum. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 306: 1-138. Woodburne M.O. (2009) - The early Vallesian vertebrates of Atzelsdorf (Late Miocene, Austria). 9. Hippotherium (Mammalia, Equidae). Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien. A., 111: 585-604. Zhegallo V.I. (1978) - Gippariony Tsentral’noj Azii. Tr Sovmest Sov-Mong Paleont Eksped, 7: 1-152. appendIx Hipparionine Character States (Bernor et al. 1990; 2017) 1) Relationship of lacrimal to the preorbital fossa: A = la- crimal large, rectangularly shaped, invades medial wall and posterior aspect of preorbital fossa; B = lacrimal reduced in size, slightly inva- des or touches posterior border of preorbital fossa; C = preorbital bar (POB) long with the anterior edge of the lacrimal placed more than half the distance from the anterior orbital rim to the posterior rim of the fossa; D = POB reduced slightly in length but with the anterior edge of the lacrimal placed still more than 1/2 the distance from the anterior orbital rim to the posterior rim of the fossa; E = POB vestigial, but lacrimal as in D; F = POB absent; G = POB very long with anterior edge of lacrimal placed less than 1/2 the distance from the anterior orbital rim to the posterior rim of the fossa. 2) Nasolacrimal fossa: A = POF large, ovoid shape and se- parated by a distinct medially placed, dorsoventrally oriented ridge, dividing POF into equal anterior (nasomaxillary) and posterior (naso- lacrimal) fossae; B = nasomaxillary fossa sharply reduced compared to nasolacrimal fossa; C = nasomaxillary fossa absent (lost), leaving only nasolacrimal portion (when a POF is present). 3) Orbital surface of lacrimal bone: A = with foramen; B = reduced foramen. 4) Preorbital fossa morphology: A = large, ovoid shape, ante- roposteriorly oriented; B = POF truncated anteriorly; C = POF fur- ther truncated, dorsoventrally restricted at anterior limit; (note CSk A-C are pre-Old World hipparionine characters); D = subtriangular shaped and anteroventrally oriented; E = subtriangularly shaped and anteroposteriorly oriented; F = egg-shaped and anteroposteriorly oriented; G = C-shaped and anteroposteriorly oriented; H = vestigial but with a C-shaped or egg-shaped outline; I = vestigial without C-shape outline, or absent; J = elongate, anteroposteriorly oriented; K = small, rounded structure; L = posterior rim straight, with non-oriented medial depression. 5) Fossa posterior pocketing: A = deeply pocketed, greater than 15 mm in deepest place; B = pocketing reduced, moderate to slight depth, less than 15 mm; C = not pocketed but with a posterior rim; D = absent, no rim but a remnant depression; E = absent. 6) Fossa medial depth; A = deep, greater than 15 mm. in deepest place; B = moderate depth, 10-15 mm in deepest place; C = shallow depth, less than 10 mm in deepest place; D = absent. 7) Preorbital fossa medial wall morphology: A = without in- ternal pits; B = with internal pits. 8) Fossa peripheral border outline: A = strong, strongly de- lineated around entire periphery; B = moderately delineated around periphery; C = weakly defined around periphery; D = absent with a remnant depression; E = absent, no remnant depression. 9) Anterior rim morphology: A = present; B = absent. 10) Placement of infraorbital foramen: A = placed distin- ctly ventral to approximately 1/2 the distance between the preorbital fossa’s anteriormost and posteriormost extent (pre- Old World hip- parionine condition); B = inferior to, or encroaching upon antero- ventral border of the preorbital fossa. 11) Confluence of buccinator and canine fossae: A = present (pre- Old World hipparionine condition); B = absent, buccinator fos- sa is distinctly delimited. 12) Buccinator fossa: A = not pocketed posteriorly; B = po- cketed posteriorly. 13) Caninus (= intermediate) fossa: A = absent; B = present. 14) Malar fossa: A = absent; B = present. 15) Nasal notch position: A = at posterior border of canine or slightly posterior to canine border; B = approximately half the distance between canine and P2; C = at or near the anterior border of P2; D = above P2; E = above P3; F = above P4; G = above Ml; H = posterior to Ml. 16) Presence of dP1: A = persistent and functional; B = re- duced and non-functional; C = absent. 17) P2 anterostyle: A = short; B = elongate 18) Curvature of maxillary cheek teeth: A = very curved; B = moderately curved; C = straight. 19) Maximum cheek tooth crown height: A = < 30 mm; B = 30 - 40 mm; C = 40 - 60 mm; D = 60 - 75 mm; E = 75+ maximum crown height. 20) Maxillary cheek tooth fossette ornamentation: A = com- plex, with several deeply amplified plications; B = moderately com- plex with fewer, more shortly amplified, thinly banded plications; C = simple complexity with few, shortly amplified plications; D = ge- nerally no plis; E = very complex. 21) Confluence (linkage) of pre- and postfosstte opposing Sivalhippus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of China 21 borders: A = linked; B = separate. 22) Posterior wall of postfossette: A = may not be distinct; B = always distinct. 23) Pli caballin morphology: A = double; B = single or oc- casionally poorly defined double; C = complex; D = plis not well formed. 24) Hypoglyph: A = hypocone frequently encircled by hypo- glyph; B = deeply incised, infrequently encircled hypocone; C = mo- derately deeply incised; D = shallowly incised. 25) Protocone shape: A = round q-shape; B = oval q-shape; C = oval; D = elongate-oval; E = lingually flattened-labially rounded; F = compressed or ovate; G = rounded; H = triangular; I = trian- gular-elongate; J = lenticular; K = triangular with rounded corners. 26) Protocone flattened: A = yes; B = no 27) Isolation of protocone: A = connected to protoloph; B = isolated from protoloph. 28) Protoconal spur: A = elongate, strongly present; B = re- duced; C = absent. 29) Premolar protocone/hypocone alignment (pre- Old World hipparionine condition): A = anteroposteriorly aligned; B = protocone more lingually placed. 30) Molar protocone/hypocone alignment (pre- Old World hipparionine condition): A = anteroposteriorly aligned; B = protoco- ne more lingually placed. 31) p2 anterostylid: A = elongate; B = short and rounded. 32) Mandibular incisor morphology: A = not grooved; B = grooved. 33) Mandibular incisor curvature: A = curved; B = straight. 34) I3 lateral aspect: A = elongate, not labiolingually con- stricted; B = very elongate, labiolingually constricted distally; C = atrophied. 35) Premolar metaconid: A = rounded; B = elongated; C = angular on distal surface; D = irregular shaped; E = square shaped; F = pointed. 36) Molar metaconid: A = rounded; B = elongated; C = an- gular on distal surface; D = irregular shaped; E = square shaped; F = pointed. 37) Premolar metastylid: A = rounded; B = elongate; C = angular on mesial surface; D = irregular shaped; E = square shaped; F = pointed. 38) Premolar metastylid spur: A = present; B = absent 39) Molar metastylid: A = rounded; B = elongate; C = an- gular on mesial surface; D = irregular shaped; E = square shaped; F = pointed. 40) Molar metastylid spur: A = present; B = absent 41) Premolar ectoflexid: A = does not separate metaconid and metastylid; B = separates metaconid and metastylid. 42) Molar ectoflexid: A = does not separate metaconid and metastylid; B = separates metaconid and metastylid; C = converges with preflexid and postflexid to abut against metaconid and meta- stylid. 43) Pli caballinid: A = complex; B = rudimentary or single; C = absent. 44) Protostylid: A = present on occlusal surface often as an enclosed enamel ring; B = absent on occlusal surface, but may be on side of crown buried in cement; C = strong, columnar; D = a loop; E = a small, poorly developed loop; F = a small, pointed projection continuous with the buccal cingulum. 45) Protostylid orientation: A = courses obliquely to anterior surface of tooth; B = less oblique coursing, placed on mesio-labial of tooth; C = vertically placed, lies flush with protoconid enamel band; D = vertically placed, lying lateral to protoconid band; E = open loop extending posterolabially. 46) Ectostylids: A = present; B = absent. 47) Premolar linguaflexid: A = shallow; B = deeper, V-sha- ped; C = shallow U-shaped; D = deep, broad U-shape; E = very broad and deep. 48) Molar linguaflexid: A = shallow; B = V-shaped; C = shal- low U-shaped; D = deep, broad U-shape; E = very broad and deep U-shape. 49) Preflexid morphology: A = simple margins; B = complex margins; C = very complex. 50) Postflexid morphology: A = simple margins; B = com- plex margins; C = very complex. 51) Postflexid invades metaconid/metastylid junction by an- teriormost portion bending sharply lingually: A = no; B = yes. 52) Protoconid enamel band morphology: A = rounded; B = flattened. _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack _GoBack