423 - 18 Nov 2009 [final version].indd


S
A

 Journal of Industrial P
sychology

http://www.sajip.co.za SA Tydskrif vir BedryfsielkundeVol. 35   No. 1   Page

   Original Research

A
rticle # 423

(page number not for citation purposes)

OCCUPATIONAL STRESS, SENSE OF COHERENCE, COPING, BURNOUT AND WORK 
ENGAGEMENT OF REGISTERED NURSES IN SOUTH AFRICA

Authors: 
Jacoba J. van der Colff1 
Sebastiaan Rothmann1

Affi liations:
1School of Behavioural 
Sciences, Vanderbijlpark
North-West University,
South Africa

Correspondence to: 
Sebastiaan Rothmann 

e-mail:
ian@ianrothmann.com

Postal address
PO Box 8660, Swakopmund,
Namibia

Keywords:
distress; eustress; 
psychological strengths; 
well-being; wellness

Dates:
Received: 08 Apr. 2008
Accepted: 26 Sept. 2008
Published: 09 Apr. 2009

How to cite this article:
Van der Colff, J.J., &
Rothmann, S. (2009).
Occupational stress, 
sense of coherence, 
coping, burnout and work 
engagement of
registered nurses in South
Africa. SA Journal of
Industrial Psychology/SA
Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 
35(1), Art. #423, 10 pages.
DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v35i1.423

This article is available 
at:
http://www.sajip.co.za

© 2009. The Authors.
Licensee: OpenJournals
Publishing. This work
is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution License.

11 of 10

INTRODUCTION
A stable and productive health service is of vital importance to any country. The health service would 
include the nursing profession, which comprises by far the greatest component of this service sector. 
Nursing is seen as a stressful and emotionally demanding profession (Carson, Bartlett & Croucher 
1991; Coffey & Coleman, 2001; Fagin, Brown, Bartlett, Leary & Carson, 1995; Schaufeli & Janczur, 1994; 
Snellgrove, 1998), which makes nurses exceptionally susceptible to burnout. 

Occupational stress has several negative effects, such as impaired performance and effectiveness, 
reduction in productivity, diminishing levels of customer service, health problems, absenteeism, 
turnover, industrial accidents, alcohol and drug usage, purposefully destructive behaviours, e.g. 
spreading of rumours and stealing (Happel, Pinikahana & Martin, 2003; Perrewé, 1991; Quick, Quick, 
Nelson & Hurrell, 1997; Wright & Smye, 1996), and even suicide (McGrath, Reid & Boore, 2003). The 
potential direct and indirect costs associated with various stress-related consequences command more 
than just adequate attention from the manager of any business. Stress is seen by Cherniss (1995) as the 
main contributing factor to burnout.

Stress is but one aspect that infl uences a person’s well-being negatively. Studies have confi rmed that one’s 
sense of coherence is an important component of one’s health and well-being (Antonovsky, 1987, 1993). 
Sense of coherence has been defi ned as a relatively stable dispositional orientation that is represented 
by the concepts of comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness (Antonovsky, 1987). A strong 
sense of coherence is related to general well-being (Feldt, 1997). Individuals with high levels of burnout 
would be expected to demonstrate lower levels of a sense of coherence. Specifi cally, the manageability 
component of a sense of coherence has been proven to be related to the exhaustion component of burnout 
(Rothmann & Malan, 2003).

According to Antonovsky (1987), a strong sense of coherence is not a particular coping style, and the 
stressors life imposes are many and varied. To adopt one pattern of coping consistently is precisely to fail 
to respond to the nature of the stressor, and hence to decrease the chances of successful coping. A person 
with a strong sense of coherence selects the particular coping strategy that seems most appropriate to 
deal with the stressor being confronted. Subsequently, the availability of a wide repertoire of coping 
strategies and fl exibility in choice at any given time are crucial (Antonovsky, 1987; Feldt, 1997). The 
stronger the sense of coherence a person has, the better his/her ability to employ cognitive, affective and 
instrumental strategies that are likely to improve coping and, subsequently, well-being.

Coping refers to the perceptual, cognitive or behavioural responses used to manage, avoid or control 
situations that could be regarded as diffi cult (Folkman & Lazarus, 1984; Moos, 1994; Zeidner & Endler, 
1996). Lazarus and Folkman (1984) initially identifi ed two coping strategies, namely problem-focused or 
active coping and emotion-focused or passive coping. Problem-focused strategies include strategies such 
as defi ning the problem, generating and weighing alternative solutions, and following a plan of action, 
whereas emotion-focused strategies include processes such as avoidance, denial, seeking emotional 
support, and positive appraisal (Folkman & Lazarus, 1984). 

According to Alsoofi , Al-Heeti and Alwashli (2000), burnout and coping strategies seem to be related 
signifi cantly. The use of withdrawal or avoidance (passive) coping strategies is associated with high 
levels of burnout, while low burnout levels are associated with constructive or active (problem-focused) 
coping strategies (Schaufeli & Enzmann, 1998). 

Although burnout can occur in any occupation, nursing is considered as being inherently stressful and 
an above-average risk group regarding work stress (Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner & Schaufeli, 2000; 
Levert, Lucas & Ortlepp, 2000; According to Schaufeli and Janczur (1994), nurses’ tasks are demanding 
because they work with the suffering, grief and death of people. Although occupational stressors that 
give rise to stress and, ultimately, to burnout are a reality in the nursing profession, there is also another 
(positive) side to the coin, namely being dedicated to and immersed in one’s work, which is referred to in 
the literature as engagement (Schaufeli, Salanova, Gonzáles-Romá & Bakker, 2002). Engaged employees

ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the occupational stress, sense of 
coherence, coping, burnout and work engagement of registered nurses in South Africa. A cross-
sectional survey design was used. The study population consisted of 818 registered nurses. The 
Nursing Stress Inventory, the Orientation to Life Questionnaire, the COPE, the Maslach Burnout 
Inventory-Human Services Survey, and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale were administered. 
The results show that the experience of depletion of emotional resources and feelings of 
depersonalisation by registered nurses were associated with stress due to job demands and a lack 
of organisational support, focus on and ventilation of emotions as a coping strategy, and a weak 
sense of coherence. Work engagement was predicted by a strong sense of coherence and approach-
coping strategies.



Original Research Van der Colff & Rothmann

Vol. 35   No. 1   Page SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde http://www.sajip.co.za

S
A

 J
ou

rn
al

 o
f I

nd
us

tr
ia

l P
sy

ch
ol

og
y

 A
rt

ic
le

 #
 4

23

(page number not for citation purposes)
2 2 of 10

see themselves as competent in dealing with the demands 
of their job. They are energetic and have a sense of effective 
connection with their work activities. 

The impact of burnout – regarded as the opposite concept 
of engagement – on the quality of care in the nursing 
profession should not be underestimated. The prevalence 
rates of occupational stress are rising continuously in most 
industrialised countries, as indicated by the increase in stress-
related absenteeism. The literature also reports an increase 
in the number of individuals who receive disability grants 
due to mental (possibly stress related) disorders (Schaufeli 
& Enzmann, 1998). In the light of these facts, the importance 
of identifying personality traits and job stressors related to 
burnout and engagement is indisputably of great importance to 
improve the standard of health services and care in the nursing 
profession. The negative impact of burnout does not apply only 
to the individual, but also – and in particular – to government 
and private organisations. 

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship 
between the occupational stress, sense of coherence, coping, 
burnout and work engagement of registered nurses in South 
Africa.

Occupational stress
Various models have been developed to understand 
occupational stress, such as the Person-Environment Fit Model 
(French, Kaplan & Harrison, 1982) and the Demand-Control 
Model of Karasek (Fox, Dwyer & Ganster, 1993). The former 
approach views psychological and physical stress as being 
the result of an incongruent person-environment fit, while 
the Demand-Control Model looks at the interaction between 
the demands of the situation and the individual’s decisional 
freedom in terms of meeting the job requirements. Although 
these models influenced a considerable body of research on 
stress, they focus on the general demands of the job and the 
skills and abilities of the incumbent, not taking into account 
the specific pressures and the role of individual differences in 
personality and coping resources (Spielberger & Vagg, 1999). 

On the basis of the Demand-Control Model of Karasek (Fox 
et al., 1993) and research results from the Maslach Burnout 
Inventory (MBI), Maslach and Jackson (1986) postulated that 
the presence of particular demands (i.e. work overload and 
personal conflicts) and the absence of particular resources (i.e. 
control coping, social support, autonomy and participation) 
would lead to the prevalence of burnout, resulting in other 
expected negative outcomes, such as physical illness, turnover, 
absenteeism, and diminished organisational commitment. 

Cavanagh (1997) and Cocco, Gatti, De Mendonça Lima and 
Camus (2003) divide stressors in the nursing profession 
into three categories, namely personal (or intrapersonal), 
interpersonal and work environment or organisational 
stressors. Personal stressors include an inability to manage 
home, work and sometimes also study responsibilities and an 
inadequate preparation of personnel for the demanding tasks 
of nursing. Interpersonal stressors reflect on relationships with 
doctors, supervisors, other senior personnel and colleagues 
(Basson & Van der Merwe, 1994). Work environment stressors 
include modern technology that is, in essence, inhumane and 
depersonalised (Cavanagh, 1997; Lewis, 1988); a high work load 
and long working hours that do not contribute to a personal 
and social life (Basson & Van der Merwe, 1994; Cavanagh, 
1997); procedures that endanger nurses’ lives; caring for and 
especially dealing with pain, suffering and dying; the strain of 
being exposed to making mistakes and managing demanding 
responsibilities (Cavanagh, 1997); a lack of autonomy (Schaufeli 
& Enzmann, 1998); role conflict and role ambiguity (Levert et al., 
2000) and under-staffing (Erasmus, Poggenpoel & Gmeiner, 
1998; Kilfedder, Power & Wells, 2001).

Sense of coherence
Antonovsky (1987) predicted that sense of coherence, defined 
as a relatively stable dispositional orientation, might cause 
employees with a strong sense of coherence to experience less 
job stress. A strong sense of coherence might help employees 
understand stressors and regard them as manageable and 
meaningful. A weak sense of coherence might therefore lead 
to job stress, which in turn could lead to burnout. Each person’s 
sense of coherence, or sense of well-being, requires certain 
inherent prerequisites for coping successfully, which are 
represented by the concepts of comprehensibility, manageability 
and meaningfulness (Antonovsky, 1987). Rothmann, Jackson 
and Kruger (2003) found that sense of coherence contributes to 
the professional efficacy of employees. Amirkhan and Greaves 
(2003) showed that a strong sense of coherence impacts on 
perception so that individuals with a strong orientation are 
likely to view a greater number of events as having coherence. 
This perceptual process seems to be subtle: it influences 
individuals’ perceptions of stressful events, but it does so 
without their conscious awareness. 

Coping
The literature on stress research is frequently linked to coping 
mechanisms. According to Bhagat et al. (2001), the level of stress 
experienced and the extent to which adverse psychological 
and physiological effects of stress occur depend on how well 
the individual utilises coping strategies in the organisational 
setting. 

Coping can be defined as the cognitive and behavioural 
efforts that individuals make to manage situations appraised 
as potentially harmful or stressful (Kleinke, 1991; McElfatrick 
et al., 2000). According to Fleishman (1984), coping could refer 
to either strategies or results. As a strategy, coping refers to the 
different methods that individuals employ to manage their 
specific circumstances, while coping as a result refers to the 
eventual outcomes of the chosen strategy for the individual. 
Tobin, Holroyd, Reynolds and Wigal (1989) distinguished 
between approach-oriented and avoidance-oriented processes 
in coping strategies. Consequently, coping strategies could be 
viewed from an active as well as a passive approach, where 
movement towards a stressor (i.e. active coping) or away from 
the stressor (i.e. passive coping) is taken as broad strategies. 

According to Lazarus (1991), the individual processing or 
appraisal of a stressful event takes place on two levels. In 
primary appraisal, significance is attached to the situation 
to determine whether or not the particular situation poses a 
potential or actual threat to the individual’s well-being. In the 
secondary appraisal process, the perceived ability of coping 
resources to deal with the event is evaluated. These appraisal 
processes can be viewed as interdependent, influencing each 
other and shaping the nature of any encounter on an individual 
level (Folkman & Lazarus, 1984). Consequently, coping is 
regarded as a process whereby the individual interacts with 
his/her environment in order to comprehend what people 
actually think and do in a stressful encounter (Holroyd & 
Lazarus, 1982). 

Burnout
Burnout has long been a proven reality in the nursing profession 
(Glass, McKnight & Valdimarsdottir, 1993; Lewis, 1988; 
McKnight & Glass, 1995; Schaufeli & Janczur, 1994; Tarolli-Jager, 
1994), with symptoms such as low energy levels, feelings of a 
lack of control, helplessness, low motivational levels, negative 
attitudes towards work, self and others, emotional exhaustion, 
absenteeism and turnover, performance deficits and substance 
abuse (Glass et al., 1993). 

Maslach, Schaufeli and Leiter (2001) describe burnout as a 
syndrome consisting of three key dimensions, namely feelings 



Registered nurses in South Africa    Original Research

http://www.sajip.co.za SA Tydskrif vir BedryfsielkundeVol. 35   No. 1   Page

S
A

 Journal of Industrial P
sychology

A
rticle # 423

(page number not for citation purposes)

33 of 10

of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and reduced 
personal accomplishment. Emotional exhaustion, representing 
the individual stress dimension of burnout, refers to feelings 
of depleted physical and emotional resources and prompts 
actions in workers to distance themselves emotionally and 
cognitively from their work, presumably as a way to cope 
with work overload. Depersonalisation entails negative and 
cynical attitudes or excessively detached responses towards 
the recipients of service and care (e.g. patients), reducing the 
recipient to an impersonal object. These two dimensions 
are generally considered to comprise the core symptoms of 
burnout (Demerouti et al., 2000). The third dimension, lack 
of personal accomplishment, represents the self-evaluation 
dimension of burnout and refers to feelings of insufficiency 
(Schaufeli & Buunk, 1996), incompetence, lack of achievement 
and unproductiveness (Maslach et al., 2001). 

Work engagement
Empirical studies have revealed that some employees, regardless 
of high job demands and long working hours, do not develop 
burnout, but seem to find pleasure in hard work and dealing 
with job demands (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2001). 

Schaufeli et al. (2002) argue that the simultaneous empirical 
investigation of burnout and engagement would be impossible 
with one instrument. Based on a theoretical analysis, burnout 
and engagement are conceptually related to each other, 
resulting in two work-related dimensions of well-being, 
namely (1) activation, ranging from exhaustion to vigour, and 
(2) identification, ranging from cynicism to dedication (Schaufeli 
& Bakker, 2001). Personal accomplishment and absorption 
were also included in the burnout and engagement constructs 
respectively, but not in an antithetical manner. It was argued 
that personal accomplishment was added only afterwards 
in the development of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), 
when a third factor was discovered during a factor analysis of a 
preliminary version of the MBI (Maslach, 1993). 

Engagement is therefore defined as a positive, fulfilling, work-
related state of mind that is characterised by three dimensions, 
namely vigour, dedication and absorption (Schaufeli et al., 
2002). Vigour refers to having high energy levels, resilience 
regarding work activities, investing effort in one’s work and 
persistence in difficult circumstances. Dedication includes 
a sense of significance, enthusiasm, inspiration, pride 
and challenge, while absorption is characterised by full 
concentration on and engrossment in one’s work, and finding 
it difficult to detach oneself from work (Schaufeli et al., 2002). 
Absorption comes close to the concept of ‘flow’, which is 
characterised by an optimal state in which focused attention, a 
clear mind, unison of body and mind, effortless concentration, 
complete control, loss of self-consciousness, time distortion and 
intrinsic enjoyment are experienced (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997). 
Engagement is theoretically viewed as the opposite end of the 
continuum from burnout that cannot be effectively measured 
by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), but is measured by 
its own survey, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) 
(Schaufeli et al., 2002). 

A study done by Mostert and Rothmann (2006) revealed that 
work engagement was best predicted by conscientiousness, 
emotional stability, and low stress due to job demands. People 
with a strong sense of coherence were also found to experience 
more work engagement (Naudé & Rothmann, 2006). This result 
is consistent with previous findings (e.g. Basson & Rothmann, 
2002; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; Wissing, De Waal & De Beer, 
1992). The study by Naudé and Rothmann (2006) also shows that 
the availability of job resources (i.e. when distress regarding job 
resources is low) and personal resources (i.e. when the sense of 
coherence is strong) enhances work engagement levels. 

The above discussion leads to the following hypotheses: 
Hypothesis 1: Occupational stress and a weak sense of coherence 
predict burnout (i.e. exhaustion and depersonalisation) and 
low work engagement.

Hypothesis 2: Approach coping and seeking emotional/social 
support predict low burnout and high work engagement; whilst 
passive coping strategies (i.e. avoidance, turning to religion and 
focus on and ventilation of emotions) predict burnout and low 
work engagement. 

RESEARCH DESIGN

Research approach
A cross-sectional survey was used to achieve the objectives of 
this research (Shaughnessy & Zechmeister, 1997).

Participants
The study population consisted of registered nurses in private 
and public hospitals in South Africa. Random samples of 
nurses were taken from hospital wards, psychiatric wards, 
community/occupational services and nursing management. 
Descriptive information of the sample of registered nurses is 
provided in Table 1.

The sample consisted mainly of female, Afrikaans-speaking 
registered nurses, working in hospital wards in the private 
sector in Gauteng province. The mean age of the participants 
was 40 years, while the average duration of service in the nursing 
profession was 19 years. A total of 52.20% of the participants 
were Afrikaans speaking, 28.90% were English speaking, and 
18.90% spoke an African language. The majority of the group 
took at least 21 days of leave during the year prior to the survey 
and 86.50% took sick leave comprising fewer than eight days

Measurement battery
The Nursing Stress Inventory (NSI) consists of 39 statements and 
was developed by Van der Colff and Rothmann (2006. Firstly, 
participants rated each of the 39 statements in terms of the 
perceived intensity of the particular stressor on a nine-point 
scale, ranging from 1 (low) to 9 (high). In the second part of the 
questionnaire, the participants were asked to respond in terms 
of perceived frequency of experiencing these stressors over the 
past six months on a 10-point scale ranging from 0 (no days) 
to 9+ (more than 9 days). Exploratory factor analyses of the NSI in 
a sample of nurses resulted in three reliable factors, namely lack 
of organisational support (e.g. lack of supervisory or managerial 
support, and colleagues not doing their jobs), demands of the 
job (e.g. having to deal with constant unfamiliar situations, 
and making critical on-the-spot decisions) and nursing-specific 
demands (e.g. death of a patient, making a mistake during the 
treatment of a patient, and watching a patient suffer). 

The Orientation to Life Questionnaire (OLQ) (Antonovsky, 1987) 
was used to measure the participants’ sense of coherence. 
The OLQ consists of 29 items. Antonovsky (1993) reported 
Chronbach alpha coefficients of the OLQ in 29 research studies 
varying between 0.85 and 0.91. Test-retest reliability studies 
found coefficients between 0.41 and 0.97 (Antonovsky, 1993). 
Rothmann (2002) reported an alpha coefficient of 0.89 for 
the OLQ, which may be regarded as acceptable (Nunnally & 
Bernstein, 1994). In terms of the construct validity of the OLQ, 
it was found that a negative relationship exists between OLQ 
and experienced stress and that the OLQ correlates negatively 
with the ‘State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait’ and the ‘Beck 
Depression Inventory’ (Frenz, Carey & Jorgensen, 1993). 

The Coping Orientation for Problem Experienced Questionnaire 
(COPE) (Carver, Scheier & Weintraub, 1989) was used to 
measure the participants’ general coping strategies. The 
COPE is a multidimensional 53-item questionnaire indicating 
the different ways in which individuals cope in different 
circumstances. Five factors were extracted for registered nurses, 
namely approach coping, seeking emotional or social support, 
avoidance as a strategy of coping, turning to religion, and focus 
on and ventilation of emotions.



Original Research Van der Colff & Rothmann

Vol. 35   No. 1   Page SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde http://www.sajip.co.za

S
A

 J
ou

rn
al

 o
f I

nd
us

tr
ia

l P
sy

ch
ol

og
y

 A
rt

ic
le

 #
 4

23

(page number not for citation purposes)
4 4 of 10

The COPE has been proven both reliable and valid in different 
cultural groups (Clark, Bornman, Cropanzano & James, 1995; 
Van der Wateren, 1997). Carver et al. (1989) also reported alpha 
coefficients for the COPE ranging from 0.45 to 0.92. With the 
exception of mental disengagement, which measures less than 
0.60, all the subscales demonstrate good levels of reliability. 
Test-retest reliability varies from 0.46 to 0.86 and 0.42 to 0.89 
after two weeks (Carver et al., 1989). Acceptable reliability and 
validity levels have been determined for the COPE in South 
Africa, rendering it suitable for use in this context (Van der 
Wateren, 1997). 

The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-
HSS) (Maslach & Jackson, 1986) was used to measure burnout 
in this study. The MBI-HSS consists of 22 items phrased as 
statements about personal feelings and attitudes that are self-
scored on a seven-point frequency scale, ranging from 0 (never) 
to 6 (every day). The three subscales of the MBI-HSS include 
emotional exhaustion (nine items; e.g. ‘I feel emotionally 
drained from my work’), depersonalisation (five items; e.g. 
‘I feel I treat some recipients as if they were impersonal 
objects’), and personal accomplishment (eight items; e.g. ‘I 
have accomplished many worthwhile things in this job’). The 
psychometric soundness of the MBI-HSS is well documented 
in the literature, with internal consistencies usually well above 
the 0.70 Cronbach alpha level, except for the depersonalisation 
scale in some samples (Schaufeli, Bakker, Hoogduin, Schaap 

& Kladler, 2001). Test- retest reliability ranging from three 
months to one year has been reported in the range of 0.50 to 
0.82 (Leiter & Durup, 1996). The three-factor structure of the 
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-
HSS) was confirmed. The factors showed acceptable construct 
equivalence for different language groups. 

The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli et al., 2002) 
measures levels of engagement. The UWES is scored on a seven-
point frequency scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day). 
Three dimensions of engagement can be distinguished, namely 
vigour (six items; e.g. ‘I am bursting with energy in my work’), 
dedication (five items; e.g. ‘I find my work full of meaning and 
purpose’) and absorption (six items; e.g. ‘When I am working, 
I forget everything else around me’). In terms of internal 
consistency, reliability coefficients for the three subscales have 
been determined between 0.68 and 0.91. Improvement of the 
alpha coefficient (ranging from 0.78 to 0.89) seems possible 
without adversely affecting the internal consistency of the 
scale (Storm & Rothmann, 2003). The three-factor structure of 
work engagement (vigour, dedication and absorption) was not 
confirmed. Instead, a one-factor model of engagement reflected 
the best data fit. Van der Colff (2006) also found evidence 
for a one-factor model of work engagement. A biographical 
questionnaire was also administered. The participants were 
given the option of providing their names and contact details to 

TABLE 1
Characteristics of registered nurses in the sample

ITEm CATEgory FrEquEnCy PErCEnTAgE

Sector Private 686           83.92
Public 132 16.08

rank Registered nurses 554 67.70
Unit managers/chief professional nurses 122 14.90

Middle and top managers 142 17.40

unit Hospital ward 613 79.40
Psychiatric ward 25 3.20

Community/occupational services (Primary health care) 67 8.70

Management 67 8.70

Specialised unit Intensive and high care 107 13.90
Surgery, urology, ear, nose and throat, orthopaedic 140 8.20

Theatre and trauma/casualties 184 24.00

Medical, oncology, outpatients, paediatrics 110 14.30

Obstetrics 59 7.70

Psychiatry and other, e.g. community nursing/management 168 21.90

years employed in nursing profession 0 – 10 years 162 19.80
10.01 – 15 years 159 19.40

15.01 – 20 years 180 22.00

20.01 – 25 years 130 15.90

25.01 – 30 years 107 13.10

30.01 and longer 80 9.80

Provinces Eastern Cape 58 8.00
Free State 42 5.80

Gauteng 350 48.50

KwaZulu-Natal 135 18.70

Mpumalanga 46 6.40

North West 57 7.90

Western Cape 33 4.60

Age 20 – 30 164 20.00
30.1 – 35 129 15.80

35.01 – 40 117 14.30

40.01 – 45 175 21.40

45.01 – 50 112 13.70

50.01 – 60 121 14.80

Home language Afrikaans 427 52.20
English 236 28.90

African 155 18.90

gender Male 21 2.60
Female 791 97.40



Registered nurses in South Africa    Original Research

http://www.sajip.co.za SA Tydskrif vir BedryfsielkundeVol. 35   No. 1   Page

S
A

 Journal of Industrial P
sychology

A
rticle # 423

(page number not for citation purposes)

55 of 10

be given feedback. Other information gathered included rank, 
unit, education, gender and language.

Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted by means of the 
SPSS Program Version 12 (SPSS Inc., 2003). Cronbach alpha 
coefficients (α) were used to assess the reliability of the 
measuring instruments (Clark & Watson, 1995). Descriptive 
statistics (e.g. means and standard deviations) were used 
to analyse the data. Pearson product-moment correlation 
coefficients were used to specify the relationships between the 
variables. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. 
Standard multiple regression analysis was carried out to assess 
the contribution of the independent variables (occupational 
stress and job satisfaction) to burnout and work engagement. 

RESULTS
The descriptive statistics, alpha coefficients and Pearson 
correlations for the extracted factors of the measuring 
instruments for registered nurses are reported in Table 2.

According to Table 2, the scores of the MBI-HSS, UWES, NSI, 
COPE and OLQ are distributed normally. The Cronbach alpha 

coefficients of all the measuring instruments are considered to 
be acceptable compared to the guideline of α > 0.70 (Nunnally & 
Bernstein, 1994), except for focus on and ventilation of emotions 
as a coping strategy, where the Cronbach alpha coefficient is 
slightly lower than 0.70 (i.e. 0.67). This correlates with the results 
reported by Carver et al. (1989), who reported alpha coefficients 
for the COPE ranging from 0.45 to 0.92. It therefore appears that 
MBI-HSS, UWES, NSI, COPE and OLQ have acceptable levels 
of reliability.

Moreover, Table 2 shows that emotional exhaustion is 
strongly related to depersonalisation and moderately 
related to organisational support, job demands, and focus 
on and ventilation of emotions. Emotional exhaustion is also 
moderately negatively related to work engagement and sense 
of coherence. Depersonalisation is moderately and negatively 
related to personal accomplishment, work engagement and 
sense of coherence. Personal accomplishment is moderately 
related to work engagement and sense of coherence, whereas 
work engagement is moderately related to approach coping and 
sense of coherence. 

Multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess whether 
or not occupational stress, sense of coherence and coping 
strategies predict burnout and the work engagement 

TABLE 2
Descriptive statistics, alpha coefficients and Pearson correlations between the scales

mEAn SD α 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1. Emotional exhaustion 22.15 11.28 0.88 - - - - - - - - - - - -

2. Depersonalisation 4.86 4.46 0.73 0.59* - - - - - - - - - - -
3. Personal accomplishment 22.60 5.20 0.71 -0.20* -0.31* - - - - - - - - - -
4. Engagement 65.47  16.69 0.94 -0.41* -0.33* 0.39* - - - - - - - - -
5. Lack of organisational support 112.50  33.70 0.93 0.32* 0.22* -0.05 -0.13* - - - - - - - -
6. Job demands 83.05  25.58 0.91 0.35* 0.26* -0.12* -0.14* 0.64* - - - - - - -
7. Nursing-specific demands 58.02  22.36 0.91 0.20* 0.14* -0.02 -0.10* 0.65* 0.54* - - - - - -

8. Approach coping 3.01 0.44 0.89 -0.07* -0.12* 0.22* 0.35* 0.03 0.02 -0.02 - - - - -
9. Seeking emotional/social support 2.91 0.62 0.86 -0.09* -0.07 0.19* 0.19* 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.45* - - - -
10. Avoidance 1.61 0.42 0.77 0.24* 0.27* -0.23* -0.11* 0.12* 0.18* 0.05 0.09* 0.08* - - -
11. Turning to religion 3.25 0.84 0.90 -0.04 -0.12* 0.04 0.16* 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.29* 0.23* 0.15* - -
12. Focus on and ventilation of emotions 2.44 0.77 0.67 0.32* 0.26* -0.08* -0.13* 0.23* 0.25* 0.18* 0.08* 0.28* 0.37* 0.09* -
13. Sense of coherence 137.92  20.46 0.86 -0.49* -0.47* 0.34* 0.42* -0.23* -0.28* -0.15* 0.30* 0.18* -0.35* 0.11* -0.29*

* p < 0.05

TABLE 3
Multiple regression analysis with Emotional Exhaustion as dependent variable and Occupational Stressors, Coping Strategies and Sense of Coherence as independent variables

moDEL  unSTAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS STAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS t p F R R2 ∆R2

 B SE Beta

1 (Constant) 7.110 1.40 - 5.10 0.00 44.21* 0.37 0.14 0.14*
Stress: lack of organisational support 0.060 0.02 0.19 3.89 0.00*

Stress: job demands 0.120 0.02 0.27 6.14 0.00*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.030 0.02 -0.06 -1.45 0.15

2 (Constant) 43.479 2.96 - 14.70 0.00 86.79* 0.55 0.30 0.16*
Stress: lack of organisational support 0.050 0.02 0.14 3.21 0.00*

Stress: job demands 0.080 0.02 0.17 4.32 0.00*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.020 0.02 -0.04 -1.13 0.27

Sense of coherence -0.230 0.02 -0.42 -13.59 0.00*

3 (Constant) 35.440 3.76 - 9.41 0.00 43.90* 0.57 0.33 0.03*
Stress: lack of organisational support 0.040 0.01 0.13 2.92 0.00*

Stress: job demands 0.070 0.02 0.15 3.77 0.00*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.020 0.02 -0.04 -0.93 0.35

Sense of coherence -0.200 0.02 -0.37 -10.45 0.00*

Approach coping 0.070 0.04 0.07 1.97 0.05*

Seeking emotional/ social support -0.210 0.07 -0.11 -3.13 0.00*

Avoidance 0.040 0.07 0.02 0.62 0.54

Turning to religion -0.100 0.10 -0.03 -0.99 0.32

Focus on and ventilation of emotions 0.840 0.17 0.17 5.08 0.00*

* p < 0.05



Original Research Van der Colff & Rothmann

Vol. 35   No. 1   Page SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde http://www.sajip.co.za

S
A

 J
ou

rn
al

 o
f I

nd
us

tr
ia

l P
sy

ch
ol

og
y

 A
rt

ic
le

 #
 4

23

(page number not for citation purposes)
6 6 of 10

of registered nurses. Table 3 shows the results of multiple 
regression analysis, with exhaustion (as measured by the MBI-
HSS) as the dependent variable, and occupational stressors (as 
measured by the NSI), coping strategies (as measured by the 
COPE) and sense of coherence (as measured by the OLQ) as the 
independent variables. 

The results in Table 3 indicate that two occupational stress 
dimensions, namely lack of organisational support and 
job demands, predicted 14% of the variance in emotional 
exhaustion (F = 44.21, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.14). Adding sense of 
coherence as an independent variable (in step 2) resulted in a 
statistically significant increase in the prediction of the variance 
in emotional exhaustion (∆F = 184.61, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.16). 
Furthermore, entering coping strategies into the regression 
analysis (step 3) resulted in a statistically significant increase 
in the variance of emotional exhaustion predicted (∆F = 7.02, 

p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.03). The regression coefficients of two stressors, 
namely stress: lack of organisational support (β = 0.13, p < 0.01), 
and stress: job demands (β = 0.17, p < 0.01), sense of coherence 
(β = -0.37, p < 0.01), as well as three coping strategies, namely 
approach coping (β = 0.07, p < 0.05), seeking emotional/social 
support (β = -0.11, p < 0.01) and focus on and ventilation of 
emotions (β = 0.17, p < 0.01) were statistically significant. In 
sum, occupational stress, a weak sense of coherence, approach 
coping, focus on and ventilation of emotions, and low seeking 
of emotional/social support predicted 33% of the variance in 
emotional exhaustion.

Table 4 shows the results of the multiple regression analysis 
with depersonalisation (as measured by the MBI-HSS) as the 
dependent variable, and occupational stressors (as measured 
by the NSI), coping strategies (as measured by the COPE) and 
sense of coherence (as measured by the OLQ) as the independent 

TABLE 4
Multiple regression analysis with Depersonalisation as dependent variable and Occupational Stressors, Coping Strategies and Sense of Coherence as independent variables

moDEL  unSTAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS STAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS t p F R R2 ∆R2

 B SE Beta

1 (Constant) 1.64 0.76 - 2.16 0.03 20.74* 0.27 0.07 0.07*

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.02 0.01 0.11 2.28 0.02*

Stress: job demands 0.05 0.01 0.21 4.56 0.00*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.01 0.01 -0.04 -0.95 0.34

2 (Constant) 21.29 1.62 - 13.16 0.00 64.00* 0.49 0.24 0.17*

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.01 0.01 0.07 1.44 0.15

Stress: job demands 0.03 0.01 0.11 2.61 0.01*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.01 0.01 -0.02 -0.57 0.57

Sense of coherence -0.12 0.01 -0.43 -13.42 0.00*

3 (Constant) 17.08 2.07 - 8.27 0.00 32.77* 0.52 0.27 0.07*

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.01 0.01 0.06 1.42 0.16 

Stress: job demands 0.02 0.01 0.09 2.21 0.03*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.01 0.01 -0.02 -0.45 0.65

Sense of coherence -0.10 0.01 -0.35 -9.66 0.00*

Approach coping 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.83

Seeking emotional/ social support -0.03 0.04 -0.03 -0.69 0.49

Avoidance 0.12 0.04 0.11 3.19 0.00*

Turning to religion -0.19 0.06 -0.11 -3.32 0.00*

Focus on and ventilation of emotions 0.84 0.17 0.17 5.08 0.00*

* p < 0.05

TABLE 5
Multiple regression analysis with Personal Accomplishment as dependent variable and Occupational Stressors,  Coping Strategies and Sense of Coherence as independent 

variables

moDEL  unSTAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS STAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS t p F R R2 ∆R2

 B SE Beta

1 (Constant) 36.88 1.00 - 36.81 0.00 4.63 0.13 0.02 0.02

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.42 0.68

Stress: job demands -0.05 0.01 -0.16 -3.46 0.00*

Stress: nursing-specific demands 0.02 0.02 0.06 1.20 0.23

2 (Constant) 17.29 2.23 - 7.76 0.00 27.47* 0.35 0.12 0.10*

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.01 0.01 0.06 1.22 0.22

Stress: job demands -0.03 0.01 -0.09 -1.90 0.06

Stress: nursing-specific demands 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.92 0.36

Sense of coherence 0.12 0.01 0.33 9.72 0.00*

3 (Constant) 18.30 2.81 - 6.50 0.00 18.13* 0.41 0.17 0.05*

Stress: lack of organisational support 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.87 0.39

Stress: job demands -0.02 0.01 -0.08 -1.77 0.08

Stress: nursing-specific demands 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.77 0.44

Sense of coherence 0.08 0.01 0.22 5.67 0.00*

Approach coping 0.10 0.03 0.13 3.46 0.00*

Seeking emotional/ social support 0.14 0.05 0.11 2.74 0.01*

Avoidance -0.24 0.05 -0.17 -4.58 0.00*

Turning to religion -0.06 0.08 -0.03 -0.78 0.43

Focus on and ventilation of emotions 0.04 0.12 0.01 0.29 0.77

* p < 0.05



Registered nurses in South Africa    Original Research

http://www.sajip.co.za SA Tydskrif vir BedryfsielkundeVol. 35   No. 1   Page

S
A

 Journal of Industrial P
sychology

A
rticle # 423

(page number not for citation purposes)

77 of 10

variables. The results in Table 4 indicate that two occupational 
stress dimensions, namely lack of organisational support and 
job demands, predicted 7% of the variance in depersonalisation 
(F = 678.51, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.07). Adding sense of coherence as 
an independent variable (in step 2) resulted in a statistically 
significant increase in the prediction of the variance in 
depersonalisation (∆F = 180.10, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.17). Furthermore, 
entering coping strategies into the regression analysis (step 3) 
resulted in a further statistically significant increase in the 
variance of depersonalisation predicted (∆F = 6.16, p < 0.01, 
∆R2 = 0.03). The regression coefficients of stress: job demands 
(β = 0.09, p < 0.03), sense of coherence (β   -0.35, p < 0.01) and three 
coping strategies, namely avoidance (β = 0.11, p < 0.01), turning 
to religion (β = -0.11, p < 0.01) and focus on and ventilation of 
emotions (β = 0.17, p < 0.01), were statistically significant. In 
total, occupational stress, a weak sense of coherence, avoidance 
coping, focus on and ventilation of emotions, and a low turning 
to religion predicted 27% of the variance in depersonalisation.

The results of a multiple regression analysis with occupational 
stressors (as measured by the NSI), coping strategies (as measured 
by the COPE), and sense of coherence (as measured by the 
OLQ) as independent variables, and personal accomplishment 
(as measured by the MBI-HSS) as the dependent variable, are 
reported in Table 5.

The results in Table 5 reveal that one occupational stress 
dimension, namely job demands, predicted 2% of the variance 
in personal accomplishment (F = 2.62, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.02). 
Adding sense of coherence as an independent variable (in 
step 2) resulted in a statistically significant increase in the 
prediction of the variance in personal accomplishment 
(∆F = 94.42, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.10). Furthermore, entering coping 
strategies into the regression analysis (step 3) resulted in a 
statistically significant increase in the variance of personal 
accomplishment predicted (∆F = 9.51, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.05). The 
regression coefficients of sense of coherence (β = 0.22, p < 0.01), 
and three coping strategies, namely approach coping (β = 0.13, 
p < 0.01), seeking emotional/social support (β = 0.11, p < 0.01) 
and avoidance (β = -0.17, p < 0.01), were statistically significant. 
In total, occupational stress because of job demands, a strong 
sense of coherence, approach-coping strategies, focus on and 
ventilation of emotion, and not making use of avoidance as 
a coping strategy predicted 17% of the variance in personal 
accomplishment.

Table 6 shows the results of a multiple regression analysis with 
work engagement (as measured by the UWES) as the dependent 
variable and occupational stressors (as measured by the NSI), 
coping strategies (as measured by the COPE) and sense of 
coherence (as measured by the OLQ) as the independent 
variables.

The results in Table 6 indicate that one occupational stress 
dimension, namely job demands, predicted 2% of the variance 
in engagement (F = 1683.06, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.02). Adding sense 
of coherence as an independent variable (in step 2) resulted in a 
statistically significant increase in the prediction of the variance 
in engagement (∆F = 152.90, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.16). Furthermore, 
entering coping strategies into the regression analysis (step 3) 
resulted in a statistically significant increase in the variance 
of engagement predicted (∆F = 13,36, p < 0.01, ∆R2 = 0.06). The 
regression coefficients of sense of coherence (β = 0.30, p < 0.01) 
and one coping strategy, namely approach coping (β = 0.25, 
p < 0.01), were statistically significant. In total, low levels of 
occupational stress because of job demands, a strong sense of 
coherence, and approach-coping strategies predicted 24% of the 
variance in engagement.

DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between 
occupational stress, sense of coherence, coping, burnout and 
work engagement in registered nurses in South Africa, using a 
cross-sectional survey design. 

The sample consisted of 818 registered nurses. Registered 
nurses experience the following stressors relating to lack of 
organisational support as relatively severe: staff shortage, 
inadequate salary, insufficient personnel to handle the workload, 
fellow workers not doing their jobs and poorly motivated co-
workers. The following stressors relating to job demands were 
experienced as relatively severe: excessive administrative 
duties, demands from clients/patients and health risks posed 
by contact with patients. Regarding stress due to nursing-
specific demands, performing painful procedures on patients 
and watching a patient suffer were identified as the two most 
intense stressors, although these items measured low on the 
frequency scale, hence the lower scores on the severity scale. 
Of all the stressors, staff shortage was rated as the most severe, 
with inadequate salaries and excessive administrative duties

TABLE 6
Multiple regression analysis with Work Engagement as dependent variable and Occupational Stressors, Coping Strategies and Sense of Coherence as independent variables

moDEL  unSTAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS STAnDArDISED CoEFFICIEnTS t p F R R2 ∆R2

 B SE Beta

1 (Constant) 74.52 2.20 - 33.87 0.00 6.16 0.15 0.02 0.02

Stress: lack of organisational support -0.03 0.03 -0.06 -1.11 0.27

Stress: job demands -0.07 0.03 -0.10 -2.13 0.03*

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.01 0.04 -0.01 -0.24 0.81

2 (Constant) 21.48 4.74 - 4.53 0.00 43.71* 0.42 0.18 0.16*

Stress: lack of organisational support -0.01 0.02 -0.01 -0.21 0.83

Stress: job demands -0.00 0.03 -0.01 -0.12 0.90

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.02 0.03 -0.03 -0.71 0.48

Sense of coherence 0.34 0.03 0.41 12.37 0.00*

3 (Constant) 5.83 5.93 - 0.98 0.33 28.32* 0.49 0.24 0.06*

Stress: lack of organisational support -0.02 0.02 -0.04 -0.78 0.44

Stress: job demands -0.01 0.03 -0.02 -0.52 0.61

Stress: nursing-specific demands -0.01 0.32 -0.01 -0.24 0.81

Sense of coherence 0.25 0.03 0.30 8.18 0.00*

Approach coping 0.39 0.06 0.25 6.73 0.00*

Seeking emotional/social support 0.13 0.11 0.04 1.16 0.25

Avoidance -0.02 0.11 -0.01 -0.15 0.88

Turning to religion 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.22 0.83

Focus on and ventilation of emotions -0.39 0.26 -0.53 -1.48 0.14

* p < 0.05



Original Research Van der Colff & Rothmann

Vol. 35   No. 1   Page SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde http://www.sajip.co.za

S
A

 J
ou

rn
al

 o
f I

nd
us

tr
ia

l P
sy

ch
ol

og
y

 A
rt

ic
le

 #
 4

23

(page number not for citation purposes)
8 8 of 10

next in line. Most of the above stressors have already been 
noted in the literature (see Happel et al., 2003; McGrath 
et al., 2003), except for health risks posed by contact with 
patients. This could be explained by the high incidence of 
HIV and AIDS in South Africa. Occupational stress due to a 
lack of organisational support and job demands contributed 
significantly to emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation. 
This confirms the results of Demerouti et al. (2000), who explain 
that the relationship between a lack of resources (organisational 
support) and depersonalisation is to be found in theories about 
work motivation, e.g. Herzberg’s two-factor hygiene theory 
and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory. A lack of fulfilment 
of basic hygiene factors or basic needs (enough resources) will 
cause employees to withdraw and develop indifferent attitudes 
towards their jobs. In light of the results of this study regarding 
the lack of organisational support (lack of resources), this 
should be a concern for organisations, as disengagement from 
or depersonalised feelings towards patients (treating patients 
as nothing more than mere objects) should be prevented at all 
costs.

While occupational stressors seem to contribute to the distress 
of registered nurses (as indicated by emotional exhaustion 
and depersonalisation) in terms of engagement and personal 
accomplishment, the results suggest that no significant 
relationships exist between occupational stress on the one 
hand, and engagement and personal accomplishment on the 
other. In this regard, Schaufeli and Bakker (2004) stated that 
personal accomplishment and work engagement form part of 
an extended engagement factor, while emotional exhaustion 
and depersonalisation form part of a burnout factor. 

Moreover, the results of this study show that burnout (emotional 
exhaustion) was moderately related to work engagement, while 
depersonalisation was related to both personal accomplishment 
and work engagement. Therefore, occupational stress could 
possibly impact on work engagement through its effect on 
burnout (emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation). 
However, empirical studies have revealed that engagement 
at work can prevail despite high job demands and long 
working hours (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2001). If one considers that 
statements regarding occupational stress were formulated in 
a negative way in the present study, the expected relationship 
with engagement would never be achieved due to the positive 
formulation of items measuring engagement. Furthermore, the 
measurement of job demands and lack of job resources was not 
done independently of experienced strain in the present study, 
which could have influenced the findings. 

A statistical analysis of the effects of sense of coherence on 
burnout and work engagement revealed that a strong sense 
of coherence predicted lower levels of emotional exhaustion 
and depersonalisation, and vice versa. Thus, registered 
nurses seem to experience a depletion of emotional resources 
when they demonstrate a weak sense of coherence. This 
result was also found to be true for personal accomplishment 
and work engagement, where a strong sense of coherence 
predicted higher levels of personal accomplishment and work 
engagement, and vice versa. This could possibly be explained 
by a predisposition to experience stimuli from the environment 
in a positive interpretative manner. They could also perceive 
stimuli as making sense on a cognitive level, perceive to be 
in control of events by means of support networks, and view 
events as motivationally relevant and meaningful. This result 
is consistent with previous findings (e.g. Basson & Rothmann, 
2002; Naudé & Rothmann, 2006; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; 
Wissing et al., 1992). According to Hobfoll (2001), burnout 
and low work engagement are the result of failure to acquire 
sufficient resources. Burnout and low work engagement might 
thus occur due to a lack of resources. Demerouti et al. (2000) 
stated in this regard that job demands are related to feelings 
of exhaustion, but also agree with Hobfoll that a lack of job 

resources is related to disengagement from or feelings of 
depersonalisation towards patients.

It was also evident from the results that registered nurses with 
a strong sense of coherence coped better with occupational 
stress due to a lack of organisational support and job 
demands. Registered nurses with a weak sense of coherence 
would probably find it difficult to structure their world to be 
understandable, orderly and consistent. They might tend to 
experience the events of life as unmanageable, perceive that 
they lack the resources to meet the demands and thus feel that 
life does not make sense on an emotional level (Antonovsky, 
1987). They would therefore understandably perceive situations 
as stressful. The results further revealed that a strong sense of 
coherence allows nurses to make use of active coping strategies 
(i.e. seeking emotional/social support) and thus to deal with 
occupational stressors in a positive, problem-solving manner. 

Sense of coherence was the only variable in this study related 
to personal accomplishment. Several scholars have argued that 
personal accomplishment reflects a personality characteristic 
rather than a genuine burnout component (Cordes & Dougherty, 
1993; Shirom, 1989). Antonovsky (1987) also regards sense of 
coherence as a personality disposition. 

The results regarding coping strategies showed that a 
relationship exists between emotional exhaustion and focus 
on and venting of emotions, meaning that nurses who make 
use of this coping strategy revealed higher levels of emotional 
exhaustion. The other side of the coin might also be true, namely 
that focus on and ventilation of emotions could be a result of 
depleted energy levels due to burnout (emotional exhaustion), 
causing nurses to feel frustrated because they cannot perform 
their duties effectively. However, Payne (2001) warns that focus 
on and ventilation of emotions as a coping strategy will always 
be part of coping for nurses, since many stressors in nursing 
cannot be changed. On the other hand, approach coping was 
found to be related to work engagement and sense of coherence, 
where nurses with a strong sense of coherence make use of 
approach coping as a coping strategy and therefore are taking 
charge of their situation and problems or stressors in the 
workplace, which also enhances work engagement.

In summary, occupational stress, a weak sense of coherence, 
approach coping, focus on and ventilation of emotions, and 
low seeking of emotional/social support predicted 33% of the 
variance in emotional exhaustion. Twenty-seven percent of the 
variance in depersonalisation was predicted by occupational 
stress, a weak sense of coherence, avoidance coping, focus on 
and ventilation of emotions, and a low turning to religion. 
Occupational stress because of job demands, a weak sense of 
coherence, approach-coping strategies, focus on and ventilation 
of emotion, and not making use of avoidance as a coping strategy 
predicted 17% of the variance in personal accomplishment, 
while low levels of occupational stress because of job demands, 
a weak sense of coherence, and approach-coping strategies 
predicted 24% of the variance in engagement. The above results 
confirm both hypotheses, namely that 1) Occupational stress 
and a weak sense of coherence predict burnout and low work 
engagement; and 2) Approach coping and seeking emotional/
social support predict low burnout and high work engagement; 
whilst passive coping strategies (i.e. avoidance, turning to 
religion and focus on and ventilation of emotions) predict 
burnout and low work engagement. 

The limitations of the present study include the use of a cross-
sectional survey design, which makes it difficult to prove 
causal relationships. A longitudinal design would have been 
the preferred method to analyse causal relationships. Another 
limitation is the exclusive use of self-report measures, a strategy 
often associated with method variance. Sample size further 
limits the research results in such a way that results cannot be 
generally applied to all registered nurses in South Africa.



Registered nurses in South Africa    Original Research

http://www.sajip.co.za SA Tydskrif vir BedryfsielkundeVol. 35   No. 1   Page

S
A

 Journal of Industrial P
sychology

A
rticle # 423

(page number not for citation purposes)

99 of 10

Recommendations
Organisations can contribute to the development of employees’ 
sense of coherence by providing information in a consistent, 
structured, ordered and understandable format. In order for 
employees to perceive that work expectations are manageable 
and within their, or important other peoples power, employers 
should ensure that employees are equipped with the necessary 
knowledge, skills, material, instruments and other resources, 
and that there is a balance in the load of tasks to be handled. 
Employees should also be given the opportunity to perform 
work that requires thought and independent judgement. 
Employees will regard their work as meaningful when a 
degree of independence and freedom of choice is allowed 
in the performance of their tasks. Participation in decision 
making will enhance the employees’ feeling of membership 
and contribute to the meaningfulness component of sense of 
coherence. Moreover, the employee should have the freedom to 
disagree with his/her supervisor, to be able to discuss what to 
do with his/her supervisor and to act autonomously. 

Job demands and a lack of organisational support should be 
managed by the organisation to prevent burnout of nurses 
and to contribute to their work engagement. Coping strategies 
are also important areas of intervention. It is necessary to 
analyse the results of this study in each hospital or institution 
before any intervention is planned. While some occupational 
stressors were found consistently in all the hospitals included 
in this study, the stressors in the different hospitals were quite 
different. Tailor-made interventions for a specific hospital 
are necessary to ensure that the planned effects are yielded 
(Kompier & Cooper, 1999). 

Better relationships amongst members of the professional team 
(e.g. doctors and other nurses, including supervisors) may 
also relieve stress. McGrath et al. (2003) suggest that this could 
be achieved by means of closer integration during training 
to enhance an understanding of each other’s role, as well as 
implementing a higher level of education for nurses, which 
might lead to increased confidence and an ability to discuss 
issues as equals with professional colleagues. The problem 
of staff shortages needs to be addressed. A re-evaluation of 
salaries might be a good point of departure in addressing this 
problem. Inadequate salaries might cause registered nurses to 
leave the profession, and often even the country, for the sake of 
opportunities that offer better financial rewards. More research 
is needed regarding the organisational factors that affect 
burnout and work engagement. 

AUTHOR’S NOTE
The material described in this article is based on work 
supported by the National Research Foundation under grant 
number 2053917.

REFERENCES
Alsoofi, M.A., Al-Heeti, K.N., & Alwashli, A. (2000, July). 

Burnout and its relationship with job stress and coping with stress 
for Yemeni teachers. Paper presented at the 28th International 
Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Amirkhan, J.H., & Greaves, H. (2003). Sense of coherence and 
stress: The mechanics of a healthy disposition. Psychology 
and Health, 18(1), 31–62. 

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unravelling the mystery of health: How 
people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense 
of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725–733.

Basson, M.J., & Rothmann, S. (2002). Sense of coherence, coping 
and burnout of pharmacists. South African Journal of Economic 
and Management Sciences, 5(1), 35–62.

Basson, C.J., & Van der Merwe, T. (1994). Occupational stress 
and coping in a sample of student nurses. Curationis, 17(4), 
35–43.

Bhagat, R.S., Ford, D.L., O’Driscoll, M.P., Frey, L., Babakus, E., 
& Mahanyele, M. (2001). Do South African managers cope 
differently from American managers? A cross-cultural 

investigation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 
25, 301–313.

Carson, J., Bartlett, H., & Croucher, P. (1991). Stress in community 
psychiatric nursing: A preliminary investigation. Community 
Psychiatric Nursing Journal, 11, 8–12.

Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.R., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing 
coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of 
Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.

Cavanagh, S.J. (1997). Educational sources of stress in midwifery 
students. Nurse Education Today, 17, 128–134.

Cherniss, C. (1995). Beyond burnout. New York: Routledge. 
Clark, K.K., Bornman, C.A., Cropanzano, R.S., & James, K. (1995). 

Validation evidence for three coping measures. Journal of 
Personality Assessment, 65, 434–455.

Clark, L.A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: 
Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological 
Assessment, 7, 309–319.

Cocco, E., Gatti, M., De Mendonça Lima, C.A., & Camus, V. 
(2003). A comparative study of stress and burnout among 
staff caregivers in nursing homes and acute geriatric wards. 
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 78–85.

Coffey, M., & Coleman, M. (2001). The relationship between 
support and stress in forensic community mental health 
nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 397–407.

Cordes, C.L., & Dougherty, T.W. (1993). A review and an 
integration of research on job burnout. Academy of 
Management Review, 18, 621–656.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and effective 
teaching: A flow analysis. In J.L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and 
liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. London: John 
Hopkins University Press. 

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W.B. 
(2000.). A model of burnout and life satisfaction amongst 
nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 454–464.

Erasmus, L., Poggenpoel, M., & Gmeiner, A. (1998). 
Beroepsmatheidervaring by psigiatriese verpleegkundiges 
in ‘n privaat psigiatriese hospital. Curationis, 21(1), 9–16. 

Fagin, L., Brown, D., Bartlett, H., Leary, J., & Carson, J. (1995). 
The Claybury community psychiatric nurse stress study: 
Is it more stressful to work in hospital or the community? 
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 347–358.

Feldt, T. (1997). The role of sense of coherence in well-being at 
work: Analysis of main and moderator effects. Work and 
Stress, 11, 134–147.

Fleishman, J.A. (1984). Personality characteristics and coping 
patterns. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 229–234.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. 
New York: Springer. 

Fox, M., Dwyer, D., & Ganster, D. (1993). Effects of stressful 
job demands and control of physiological and attitudinal 
outcomes in a hospital setting. Academy of Management 
Journal, 36, 289–318.

French, J.R.P., Jr., Kaplan, R.D., & Harrison, R.V. (1982). The 
mechanisms of job stress and strain. Chichester: Wiley.

Frenz, A.W., Carey, M.P., & Jorgensen, R.S. (1993). Psychometric 
evaluation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. 
Psychological Assessment, 5, 145–153.

Glass, D.C., McKnight, J.D., & Valdimarsdottir, H. (1993). 
Depression, burnout, and perceptions of control in hospital 
nurses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 147–
155.

Happel, B., Pinikahana, J., & Martin, T. (2003). Stress and 
burnout in forensic psychiatric nursing. Stress and Health, 
19, 63–68.

Hobfoll, S.E. (2001). The influence of culture, community and the 
nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of 
resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 
50, 337–369.

Holroyd, K.A., & Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Stress, coping and somatic 
adaptation. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook    
of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 21-35). New York: 
Free Press. 

Kilfedder, C.J., Power, K.G., & Wells, T.J. (2001). Burnout in 
psychiatric nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 383–
396.



Original Research Van der Colff & Rothmann

Vol. 35   No. 1   Page SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde http://www.sajip.co.za

S
A

 J
ou

rn
al

 o
f I

nd
us

tr
ia

l P
sy

ch
ol

og
y

 A
rt

ic
le

 #
 4

23

(page number not for citation purposes)
10 10 of 10

Kleinke, C.L. (1991). Coping with life challenges. San Francisco: 
Brooks/Cole.

Kompier, M., & Cooper, C. (1999). Preventing stress, improving 
productivity. London: Routledge.

Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Psychological stress in the workplace. In 
P.L. Perrewé (Ed.), Handbook on job stress (pp. 1–13). Corte 
Madera: Select Press.

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Coping and adaptation. In 
W.D. Gentry (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 282–
325). New York: Guilford.

Leiter, M.P., & Durup, J. (1996). Work, home, and in-between: A 
longitudinal study of spill-over. Journal of Applied Behavioral 
Science, 32, 29–47.

Levert, T., Lucas, M., & Ortlepp, K. (2000). Burnout in psychiatric 
nurses: Contributions of the work environment and a sense 
of coherence. South African Journal of Psychology, 30, 36–43. 

Lewis, H. (1988). Uitbrandingsindroom: Siekte van ons tyd, met 
‘n boodskap. RSA Verpleging, 3(4), 26–28.

Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. 
In W.B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach & T. Marek (Eds.), Professional 
burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 19–32). 
Washington DC: Taylor & Francis.

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S.E. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory 
(2nd edn.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. 
Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. 

McElfatrick, S., Carson, J., Annett, J., Cooper, C., Holloway, 
F., & Kiupers, E. (2000). Assessing coping skills in mental 
health nurses: Is an occupation specific measure better 
than a generic coping skills scale? Personality and Individual 
Differences, 28, 965–976.

McGrath, A., Reid, N., & Boore, J. (2003). Occupational stress in 
nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40, 555–565.

McKnight, J.D., & Glass, D.C. (1995). Perceptions of control, 
burnout, and depressive symptomatology: A replication 
and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 
63, 490–494.

Moos, R.H. (1994, July). Conceptual and empirical advances in stress 
and coping theory. Paper presented at the 23rd International 
Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.

Mostert, K., & Rothmann, S. (2006). Work-related well-being in 
the South African Police Service. Journal of Criminal Justice, 
34, 479–491.

Naudé, J.L.P., & Rothmann, S. (2006). Work-related well-being of 
emergency workers in South Africa. South African Journal of 
Psychology, 36, 63–81.

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd 
edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Payne, N. (2001). Occupational stressors and coping as 
determinants of burnout in female hospice nurses. Journal 
of Advanced Nursing, 33, 396–405.

Perrewé, P.L. (1991). Handbook on job stress. Corte Madera: Select 
Press.

Quick, J.C., Quick, J.D., Nelson, D.L., & Hurrell, J.J. (1997). 
Preventative stress management in organisations. Washington  
DC: American Psychological Association.

Rothmann, S. (2002, March). Burnout research in South Africa. 
Paper presented at the 1st South African Conference on 
Burnout, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Rothmann, S., Jackson, L.T.B., & Kruger, M.M. (2003). Burnout 
and job stress in a local government: The moderating effects 
of sense of coherence. South African Journal of Industrial 
Psychology, 29(4), 52–60. 

Rothmann, S., & Malan, H. (2003). Koherensiesin, 
selfdoeltreffendheid, lokus van beheer en uitbranding by 
maatskaplike werkers. South African Journal of Industrial 
Psychology, 29(4), 43–51.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Bakker, A.B. (2001). Werk en welbevinden: 
Naar een positieve benadering in de Arbeids- en 
Gezondheidspsychologie [Work and wellbeing: Towards 
a positive occupational health psychology]. Gedrag en 
Organizatie, 14, 229–253.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Bakker, A.B. (2004). Job demands, job 
resources, and their relationship with burnout and 
engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational 
Behaviour, 25, 1–23.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Buunk, A.P. (1996). Professional burnout. 
In M.J. Schabracq, J.A.M. Winnubst & C.L. Cooper (Eds.). 
Handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 311–346). 
Chichester: Wiley.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Enzmann, D. (1998). The burnout companion 
to study and practice: A critical analysis. London: Taylor & 
Francis.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Janczur, B. (1994). Burnout among nurses. 
Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 25, 95–112.

Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., Hoogduin, K., Schaap, C., & 
Kladler, A. (2001). On the clinical validity of the Maslach 
Burnout Inventory and the Burnout Measure. Psychology 
and Health, 16, 565–582.

Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, 
A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: 
A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness 
Studies, 3, 71–92.

Shaughnessy, J.J., & Zechmeister, E.B. (1997). Research methods in 
psychology (4th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Shirom, A. (1989). Burnout in work organizations. In C.L. Cooper 
& I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and 
Organizational Psychology, Vol. IV (pp. 25–49). New York: 
Wiley. 

Snellgrove, S.R. (1998). Occupational stress and job satisfaction: 
A comparative study of health visitors, district nurses 
and community psychiatric nurses. Journal of Nursing 
Management, 6, 97–104.

Spielberger, C.D., & Vagg, P.R. (1999). Job stress survey: Professional 
manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

SPSS Inc. (2003). SPSS 12.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS.
Storm, K., & Rothmann, S. (2003). A psychometric analysis of the 

Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey in the South 
African Police Service. South African Journal of Psychology, 33, 
219–226. 

Surmann, A.T. (1999). Negative mood regulation expectancies, 
coping, and depressive symptoms among American nurses. 
Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 540–543.

Tarolli-Jager, K. (1994). Personal hardiness: Your buffer against 
burnout. American Journal of Nursing, 94, 71-72.

Tobin, D.L., Holroyd, K.A., Reynolds, R.V., & Wigal, J.K. (1989). 
The hierarchical factor structure of the Coping Strategies 
Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343–361.

Trummers, G.E.R., Janssen, P.P.M., Landeweerd, A., & Houkes, 
I. (2001). A comparative study of work characteristics and 
reactions between general and mental health nurses: A 
multi-sample analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 151–
162. 

Van der Colff, J.J. (n.d.) Work-related well-being of registered  nurses 
in South Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis, North-West 
University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Van der Wateren, E. (1997). Die dinamiek van waardes, coping style 
en psigologiese gesondheid by ‘n groep jeugdiges [The dynamics 
of values, coping styles and psychological strengths in a 
group of youths]. Unpublished master’s thesis, PU for CHE, 
Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Wissing, M.P., De Waal, M., & De Beer, I. (1992, July). Sense of 
coherence and stress symptomatology. Paper presented at    
the 25th International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, 
Belgium.

Wright, L.A., & Smye, M.D. (1996). Corporate abuse: How lean and 
mean robs people and profits. New York: Macmillan.

Zeidner, M., & Endler, N.S. (1996). Handbook of coping: Theory, 
research, applications. New York: Wiley.