SA Orthopaedic Journal Autumn 2017 | Vol 16 • No 1 Page 49 Early onset scoliosis: The use of growth rods RD Govender MBBCh(Wits), FC Orth(SA) AOSpine Fellow at the Spine Surgery Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital RN Dunn MBChB(UCT), MMed(UCT)Orth, FCS(SA)Orth Pieter Moll and Nuffield Chair of Orthopaedic Surgery and HOD University of Cape Town Corresponding author: Prof RN Dunn Department of Orthopaedic Surgery H49 OMB Groote Schuur Hospital 7925 Observatory Cape Town Tel: 021 404 5387 Fax: 021 447 2709 Email: info@spinesurgery.co.za Introduction The management of scoliosis in the growing child presents a unique challenge to the treating surgeon due to the patient’s small size, frequently associated comorbidities and pulmonary consequences with early fusion. Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as scoliosis occurring before the age of 5 years. It affects not only the growing spine but also has a direct influence on the cardiopulmonary development and function of the child. Cardiopulmonary function is compromised as a result of the decreased size of the thoracic cavity, which has a negative effect on lung alveolar development. The goal in the management of EOS is to control the deformity and allow continued growth of the spine and thoracic cavity. Non-fusion instrumentation facilitates this and allows ongoing respiratory development. Abstract Background: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as scoliosis occurring before the age of 5 years. The management presents a unique challenge where both natural history and fusion lead to impaired cardiopulmonary function of the child. Aim: To assess the outcome of the use of non-fusion instrumentation and repetitive elongation (‘growth rods’) in EOS. Methods: A retrospective review of 14 consecutive patients who underwent growth rod implantation and length- ening procedure for EOS was performed. Growth rod constructs were constructed predominately from modular commercially available sets using laminar hooks, pedicle screws and connection blocks, with single or double rod constructs. Vertical expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTR) were used in two patients. Patients returned to theatre at six-monthly intervals for a lengthening procedure. Patients were assessed with regard to type of scoliosis, age at surgery, number of lengthenings done, progression of Cobb angle, amount of construct lengthening, amount of spine growth achieved and complications. Results: The most common type of scoliosis seen was idiopathic (five), followed by neuromuscular (four), conjoined twins (two), syndromic (two), and congenital (one). Five patients were followed until final fusion, one procedure was stopped due to wound complications and one patient was lost to follow-up. The 14 patients had a median of seven lengthenings each. The median pre-operative Cobb angle was 56º (IQR 46.5º–59.5º) and median last follow- up Cobb angle of 32.5º (IQR 27.0º–44.5º). The median spine growth achieved was 97 mm (IQR 69–122 mm). Eight of the 14 patients (57%) experienced 14 complications during their lengthening procedures. Conclusions: The growth rod instrumentation provides spinal deformity correction and control, while allowing ongoing growth of the spine. It is a labour-intensive process with significant incidence of complications. There is however very little other choice in these patients due to concerns of early fusion restricting pulmonary development. Key words: spine, growth rods, scoliosis http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2017/v16n1a7 SAOJ Autumn 2017.qxp_Orthopaedics Vol3 No4 2017/02/27 7:42 PM Page 49 SAOJ Autumn 2017.qxp_Orthopaedics Vol3 No4 2017/02/27 7:42 PM Page 50 SAOJ Autumn 2017.qxp_Orthopaedics Vol3 No4 2017/02/27 7:42 PM Page 51 SAOJ Autumn 2017.qxp_Orthopaedics Vol3 No4 2017/02/27 7:42 PM Page 52 SA Orthopaedic Journal Autumn 2017 | Vol 16 • No 1 Page 53 Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR): This technique was developed to treat thoracic insufficiency syndrome. The device is connected to the ribs to primarily expand the constricted thorax and secondarily allow spine growth and indirectly correct the scoliosis.7,14 The goal is to restore the growing thorax to maximise development of the lungs; thus it should be the treatment option when addressing a thoracic deformity.2 Lengthening of the prosthesis is required every six months. Complications are similar to growing rods, namely wound problems, rib fractures and creeping fusion.1 Compression-based implants This technique uses the Heuter Volkman principle of compression forces inhibiting growth.9 Vertebral staples are placed spanning the intervertebral disc spaces resulting in asymmetrical loading of the vertebral growth plates on the side that had the staple placement. Limited correction is possible with stapling. The literature on stapling is limited and the clinical indications for stapling are not universally accepted.11 Guided-growth implants: The Luque trolley technique in which rods are attached to the spine using sublaminar wiring is largely of historical interest. Due to the extensive subperiosteal dissection most patients had a spontaneous fusion of the instrumented region. The Shilla technique allows spine growth to occur with screws that slide along the rods that are inserted proximally and distally.1 The management of early onset scoliosis is a prolonged and labour-intensive process. Complications are frequent and should be expected. They are related to the number of surgical proce- dures performed and the length of treatment.15 Wound breakdown, delayed healing and sepsis are frequent. Due to the non-fusion technique, screw/hook dislodgement, rod or screw breakage are seen. Junctional kyphosis and curve progression may also occur.13 These complications are the price to be paid for the non-fusion technique which allows ongoing thoracic growth and potential pulmonary development. This technique allows for early correction and control of the deformity which makes the definitive surgery at a later stage, less complex. Conclusion Early onset scoliosis remains a challenging condition to treat. The growth rod instrumentation provides an option to correct and control the spinal deformity, while gaining growth in torsal height. This allows thoracic wall growth and potentially allows for continued lung development. It is a labour-intensive process with significant incidence of complications. There is, however, very little other choice in these patients due to concerns of early fusion restricting pulmonary development and eventual function. Acknowledgement Dr Peter Hardcastle contributed to the initial data collection while a registrar in the department. Compliance with ethics guidelines Prof Dunn and Dr Govender declare that this article is their original work. They have no conflict of interest and have received no commercial benefits of any kind for the writing of this article. Ethics clearance was obtained for the use of the patient information. References 1. Gomez JA, Lee JK, Kim PD, Roye DP, Vitale MG. ‘Growth friendly’ spine surgery: management options for the young child with scoliosis. J AM Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:722-27. 2. Thompson GH, Lenke LG, Akbarnia BA, et al. Early onset scoliosis: future directions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89-A:163-66. 3. Karol L, Johston C, Mladenov K et al. Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1272-81. 4. Goldberg CJ, Gillic I, Connaughton O, et al. Respiratory function and cosmesis at maturity in infantile-onset scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:2397- 2406. 5. Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 2012;21:64-70. 6. de Groodt EG, van Pelt W, Borsboom GI. Growth of the lung and thorax dimensions during the pubertal growth spurt. Eur Respir J 1988;1:102-108. 7. Campbell RM, Smith MD, Mayes TC et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:399-408. 8. Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, et al. A meta analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:664-74. 9. Akbarnia BA, Campbell RM, Dimeglio A, et al. Fusionless proce- dures for the management of early-onset spine deformities in 2011: what do we know? J Child Orthop 2011;5:159-72. 10. Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA, Flynn JM et al. A classification of growth- friendly spine implants. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34(3):260-74. 11. Cunningham ME, Frelinghuysen PHB, Roh JS, et al. Fusionless scoliosis surgery. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005;17:48-53. 12. Yazici M, Emans J. Fusionless instrumentation systems for congenital scoliosis. SPINE 2009;17:1800-1807. 13. Akbarnia B, Marks D. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis. Spine 2005;30(17S), S46–S57. 14. Campbell RM Jr, Hell-Vocke AK. Growth of the thoracic spine in congenital scoliosis after expansion thoracoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85:409-420. 15. Bess S, Akbarnia B. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:2533-43. This article is also available online on the SAOA website (www.saoa.org.za) and the SciELO website (www.scielo.org.za). Follow the directions on the Contents page of this journal to access it. • SAOJ SAOJ Autumn 2017.qxp_Orthopaedics Vol3 No4 2017/03/03 9:57 AM Page 53