SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 32 THE INTEGRATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION PROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA Deffi Ayu Puspito Sari, Ph.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) 1Universitas Bak rie, 2Professional Certification Agency of Disaster Management E-mail: , deffi.sari@bakrie.ac.id , rizkyafriono@gmail. com (Diterima : 16-Dese mber-2016; direvisi: 18-Januari-2017; d ipublikasikan : 05-Maret-2017) Abstrac t.The Republic of Indonesia La w nu mber 24 year 2007 on disaster emphasizes that the protection of natio nal assets is in line with Law No. 11 year 2010 on the cultural heritage. Yogyakarta Province has 12 disaster hazards and has five complet e archaeological cultura l layers in Indonesia. In the event of a disaster, potential da mage to the cultural heritage i s e xposed. The archaeological cu ltural layer consists of prehistoric, classical, Isla mic and colonial. The lac k of research re lated to cultu ral heritage in the province resulting in increasing vulnerability of cultural heritage and society. Using qualitati ve method with in- depth interview, the aim of this study is to analyse the management of cultural heritage fro m the perspective of disaster manage ment. Archaeological cultural layers that embedded into the realm of cultura l heritage is defined as a nationa l asset that should be protected. The result shows that the management of cultura l resources in the province is not yet integrated with disaster management. However, the results of the archaeological identification of cultura l heritage in each cu ltural lay er in Yogyaka rta showed the development of community adaptation to the disaster. Utilizat ion of cultural heritage as an element of the panca gatra has been impartia l that affected the regional resilience and security in fac ing the disaster. Both of these p roblems can be overcome by integrating the cultural resources management and disaster management, the establishment of a n eme rgency response team on cultural preservation, and disaster risk analysis on cultural heritage that annexed by BPBD and Cultura l Office o f Yogyakarta Province. Keywords : Cultural Resources Management; Disaster Management; Contingency Plan; Cultural He ritage; Archaeological Identificat ion. Introduction Yogyakarta Special Region (Yogyakarta Province) is one of 34 provinces in Indonesia. At the time of colonialism in the area that nowadays known as Yogyakarta province, colonial governments builtmany public facilities, places of worship and the palace which reveal European architecture. Yogyakarta province has comprehensive wealth of historywhich describes the development of human culture from prehistoric to modern times. Yogyakarta province consist of four regencies (Sleman, Bantul, Gunung K idul and K ulon Progo) and one city (Yogyakarta). Table 1shows that each regency or city has all the cultural layers, except the city of Yogyakarta which does not have prehistoric relics. However, Yogyakarta city has most objects of cultural heritage compare to other areas, namely 265 relics that dominated by Islamic relics. Relics from colonial period also mostly founded in Yogyakarta city. In other areas such as Sleman, relics from classical period is dominating, while the largest prehistoric relics are dominating in Gunung K idul. Data from 1815 to 2011 shown that 12 types of disasters(potential disaster) have occurred in Yogyakarta province [1]. SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 33 This potential disasters means that the disastrous events in the past is likely to occur again in the future. The potential disaster in Yogyakarta province, among others: floods, epidemic disease outbreaks, extreme waves and erosion, earthquakes, tsunamis, failed technology, droughts, volcanic eruptions, strong winds, landslides, fires and social disaster. In the event of disaster, damage to the cultural heritage is exposed. TABLE 1 LIST OF CULTURAL RELICS IN YOGYAKART A P ROVINCE No. Re gency /City Period Total Prehis- toric Classi c Is- lam Coloni al 1 Yogyakart a 2 148 115 265 2 Sleman 1 88 66 10 165 3 Bant ul 13 5 56 29 103 4 Gunung Kidul 43 2 6 2 53 5 Kulon Progo 3 5 22 9 39 Source: http ://p urbakalay ogy a.com/p otensi-y ogy akarta.html accessed February 22, 2017 [2]. Based on historical data, Yogyakarta province's government has made a priority scale based on the potential disaster in five regency/city. Table 2 shows that Bantul regency is an area that has most types of potential disasters , which are : earthquake, tsunami, floods, landslides, e xtre me weather and drought. While Yogyakarta city is the area has only one kind of potential disaster, name ly the earthquake. Vie wed fro m the side of potential volcanic eruption, Sle man regency is the most exposed. TABLE 2 P RIORITY ZONE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA Priority Zone of Disaster Management District/Town 1. Earthquake 1 Bantul 2 Yo gy akarta 3 Sleman 2. Tsunami 1 Bantul 2 Kulon Progo 3. Flood 1 Bantul 2 Kulon Progo 4. Landslide 1 Bantul 2 Sleman 3 Gunung Kidul 5. Volcano Erup tion 1 Sleman 6. Extreme Weather 1 Bantul 2 Sleman 7. Drought 1 Bantul 2 Sleman 3 Gunung Kidul Source : Disaster M anagement Plan Sp ecial R egion of Yo gy akarta 2013-2017 p .84 [3]. This study considers the importance of detailed standard operating procedures for disaster management related to preserving cultural resources in th e event of disaster. Management of cultural resources, not mere ly about the preservation of cultural heritage, but also must includes research related to cultural resources. The problem addressed in this research, a mong others: 1. Ho w does the handling of cultural heritage in disaster manage ment? 2. How cultura l heritage reflects community resilience infacing disasters? II. RESEA RCH M ETHODS This is a qualitative research with inductive approach and aim to get deeper conclusions on individual or organizational e xpe rience. The subjects of this study were people who were directly involved as a resource [4]. They are the Head of the Provincial Disaster Management Agency, Archaeology Department of Indonesia University, http://purbakalayogya.com/potensi-yogyakarta.html SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 34 Archaeology Department of Ga jah Mada Univ ersity, Deputy of Rehabilitation and Reconciliat ion of National Disaster Management Agency Yogyakarta Chapter, Directorate of Cultura l Heritage Preservation and Museum of Min istry of Culture and Education, Div ision of Heritage Preservation and Cultural Va lue of Yogyakarta province Cu ltural Office, Borobudur Unit Cu ltural Heritage Preservation Body, Yogyaka rta Touris m Serv ice, Puro Pa kuala man Museum, Yogyaka rta province legislative body, Piyungan Islamic Boarding School, and the Head of Yogyakarta province Culture Office. The object of study is the social situation which consists of three components, namely the place (space), actor (perpetrator) and activities (activity). In qualitative research data analysis is more focused during the process along with the field data collection. The initia l step of data analysis has been conducted since the search for a variety of informat ion fro m secondary sources that are useful as giving early descriptions of research problems. It is intended as an anticipation before performing data reduction so that the collected data is suffic ient for analysis [5]. To test data that is valid, reliable and objective, e xtension of observation, improved persistence, triangulation, discussions with colleagues, negative case analysis and me mber check was done to confirm data credibility. III. ANA LYSIS A ND DISCUSSION 3.1 An Overview of Re search Data Yogyaka rtaprovince's cultural heritage spread evenly over 5 City/Regency. Yogyakarta c ity does not have a layer of prehistoric archaeological heritage. This does not rule out the possibility ofprehistoric cultural layers discovery in the future. The development of archaeological research as the first step of the cultural layers ' collection will continue to grow and discover new things. Movable cultural heritage objects have a weakness that is not located at its original site, usually placed on museums or research centres. Objects of cultural heritage in Yogyaka rta province can be classified by type, in archaeological research methods artefacts can be classified based on several categories, among others [6]: 1. Based on type (instrument massive, fla kes bar, picka xe square, pipisan and mortar as well as coins). 2. Based on materials (cera mics, glass objects, bone tools, and tools shells and clams). 3. Based on specific objects (je wellery and roc k art). Based on the data classification, movable cultural heritage objects in Yogyakarta province has twelve type name ly: decorative architectural, decorative orna mental, fla kes bar, pic ka xe square, pipisan and mortar, stupik a/tablets, coins, ceramics, pottery, metal, je wellery and iconography. Arca can be classified into the iconography because actually the embodiment of the gods codified to a materia l object. 3.2. Movable cultural heritage objects in Yogyakarta province Table 3 shows that 94 p ieces or 35.47% movable cultural heritage objects ' location are unknown, while 64.52,% a re detected. Movable cultural heritage is placed on three areas, namely Bantul, Sle man and Yogyakarta city. Bantul district has the largest number of movable cultural heritage objects that is 133 pieces, then Sle man with 31 pieces and in the city of Yogyakarta as many as 7 p ieces. Cultura l layers of movable cultural heritage in the province shows the most important lining is the prehistoric which is equal to 42 objects (26%), followed by a layer of the classical period a mounted to 41.50% , the Isla mic cultura l layer (14.71%) and colonia l cu ltural layer (1.50% ). TABLE 3 NUMBER OF MOVABLE CULT URAL HERITAGE OBJECT S IN YOGYAKARTA P ROVINCE Recency/ City Culture Layer of Yogyakarta Pro vince Prehis- toric Classic Islam Colo- nial Tot al Bant ul 52 64 17 0 133 (%) 39.10 48.12 12.78 0.00 Yogyakart a 6 1 0 0 7 (%) 85.71 14.29 0.00 0.00 SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 35 Sleman 23 8 0 0 31 (%) 74.19 25.81 0.00 0.00 Not Known 31 37 22 4 94 (%) 32.98 39.36 23.40 4.26 Tot al 112 110 39 4 265 (%) 42.26 41.51 14.72 1.51 Source: BPCB DIY (2015), rep rocessed by the author 3.3 Non-movable cultural heritage objects in Yogyakarta province Fro m table 4, data regardingnon-movable cultural heritage in the Yogyakarta province shows that94.01% location is known and amounted to 5.98% is in unknown location. Mostly storedin Bantul (29.91%), fo llo wed by 29.05% in Sle man, Gunung Kidul (14.52% ), 11.11% in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta (9.40%) and in unknown location of 5.98%. TABLE 4 NUMBER OF NON-MOVABLE CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT S IN YOGYAKARTA P ROVINCE Recency/ City Culture Layer Yogyakarta Pro vince Prehis- toric Classic Islam Colo- nial Not Known Tot al Bant ul 0 5 16 4 10 35 (%) 0.00 14.29 45.72 11.43 28.58 29.91 Sleman 1 22 0 1 10 34 (%) 2.94 64.71 0.00 2.94 29.41 29.05 Gunung Kidul 8 5 0 1 3 17 (%) 47.05 29.41 0.00 5.88 17.64 14.52 Kulon Progo 0 1 3 7 2 13 (%) 0.00 7.69 23.07 53.84 15.38 11.11 Yogyakart a 0 0 2 0 9 11 (%) 0.00 0.00 18.19 0.00 81.82 9.43 Not Known 0 0 3 0 4 7 (%) 0.00 0.00 42.86 0.00 57.14 5.98 Tot al 9 33 24 13 38 117 (%) 7.69 28.21 20.51 11.11 32.48 100 Source: BPCB DIY (2015), reprocessed by the author In Bantul, non-movable cultural heritage objects is dominated by Islamic cultural layer (45.72%), followed by a layer of classical culture(14.29% ), colonia l cultural layer of 11.43% and an unknown cultural layer of 28.5 8% . Bantul has no non-movable cultura l heritage representing prehistoric cultural layers. Sle man is do minated by the classical period a mounted to 64.71% , followed by a layer of colonial and prehistoric cultures both by 2.94% and 29.4% unknown cultural layer . Gunung Kidul has the most non- movable cultura l heritage objectsin prehistoric cultural layer of 47.05%, followed by a layer of classical culture by 29.41%, a layer of colonial culture by 5.88% and an unknown cultural layer of 17.64%. The largest non-movable cultural heritage in Kulon Progo is represents by colonial cultural layer that is 53.84% , fo llo wed by a layer of Isla mic culture (23.07%), c lassical culture (7.69%) and unknown cultural layer of 15.38%. Yogyakarta has 18.18% non- movablecultura l heritage in Isla mic period and unknown cultural layer of 81.81%. 3.4Handling Cultural Heritage; The Implementation In accordance with the mandate of Law No. 4 in 2007 that cultural heritage is inc lude in the category of a national asset which should be protected and secured [7]. Handling cultural heritage will be described in sequence based on the concept of cultural resource manage ment and disaster manage ment. Early stage in the concept of cultural resource manage ment is the Protectionthat consist of zoning, security, ma intenance, preservation and restoration. Stag es of zoning, security and maintenance in disaster manage ment is includes in the pre-disaster phase, the preservation is more focused on emergency response and restoration phase is associated with post-disaster phase. Rebuilding preparedness is the initia l processes in disaster management integrated with the management of cultural resources. The imple mentation of disaster manage ment has the scope of pre-disaster, disaster and post- disaster response and risk reduction efforts. Disaster risk reduction is not in the end nor in early stages of the cycle, but in every stage of the disaster manage ment cycle. Cultura l resource management is very strongly linked to the disaster SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 36 manage ment because it has the scope to preserve the cultural heritage through the protection, development and utilizat ion of cultural resources, if both cycles is integrated, cultural heritage can be utilized as much as possible for the benefit of the nation. Conclusion regarding the imple mentation of cultural resources manage ment in Yogyakarta p rovince, na mely : 1. The absence of disaster management in the cultural heritage set in Indonesia, including standard operational procedure in handling cultural heritage in time of disaster. 2. Cultural heritage is not included in the contingency plan of Yogyakarta province. 3. The absence of risk assessment of the cultural heritage in the province. 4. Lac k of integration between the management of cultural resources with disaster manage ment in the province 5. The absence of a strong partnership between BNPB with relevant agencies and other stakeholders in disaster manage ment on cultural heritage. 6. The paradig m of d isaster risk reduction has not been imple mented properly in the management stagesof cultural resources. 7. At the time o f disaster response and post-disaster, cultural heritage is still not a top priority that led to the threat of loss or damage. 8. Lack of imp le mentation of risk management or train ing to increase the capacity of the cultural guard to be an e xpert. 9. The absence of an emergency response plan and team on cultural heritage in the province. 3.5. Suggestions related to the handling of cultural heritage in disaster management Management of cultural resources in disaster manage ment comprises the step of protection, develo pment and utilization. Figure 1 shows the three stages of disaster manage ment phases intersect with that of preparedness, eme rgency response and post-disaster. Preservation, research, revitalization and development of character are available in both cultural resource manage ment and disaster manage ment. Preservation is a concept that should exist in all three phases of disaster manage ment, the need for research and revitalization will result in better disaster manage ment and development of character is the e xpected output of disaster manage ment. Disaster Management Cultural Resources Management Cultural Resources Managemen in Disaster Management Protection P o s t D is a s te r Disaster Risk Reduction D is a s te r R e s p o n s e Zoning Security Maintenance Strenghtening Heritage Rescue P r e D is a s te r Restoration Early Warning Build Emergency Response Plan Ensure that an Emergency Response Plan Mobilization Conservation Team Mitigation Rebuilding Reserve Heritage Development Utilization R e s e a r c h R e v it a li z a ti o n i N a ti o n a l C h a r a c te r B u il d in g , S tr e n g h te n in g D ip lo m a c y Adaptation Preservation of Cultural Heritage FIGURE 1 INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN DISAST ER RELIEF Source: The Law no. 11 y ear 2010 [8], IOM [9] rep rocessed by the author Figure 2 illustrates the structure of e mergency response in the province. Making Cultural He ritage Emergency Response Team (Tim Tanggap Darurat Cagar Budaya - TTDC B) is required for the movement of the security and rescue in accordance with the procedures for handling cultural heritage. The involve ment of the military (TNI) in accordance with the International Military Cultura l Resources Working Group (IMcurW G) [10]will strengthen its role in terms of security of cultura l heritage. Data Co llect ion SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 37 FIGURE 2 ST RUCT URE OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE EMERGENCY RESP ONSE Source: IFRC [11], rep rocessed by the author There are four risks in cultural heritage associated with the environment as shown in Figure 3, that are the risk of utilization, in this case, including for research; environmental risks and hazards, na mely the reduction of the value of cultural heritage ; risk of damage due to improper handling and safety; and evacuation risk for not comply ing with operational standards. Calculat ion of security includes threat prevention, early warning, the cultural heritage and human evacuation, temporary shelter and priorit ies collection by colour. Preventive manage ment include manage ment system, storage security, standard list of vulnerabilities collect ion and evacuation operations and the imple mentation of cultural resource manage ment. FIGURE 3 DISAST ER RISK ANALYSIS ON CULTURAL HERITAGE Source: Chien Lien, Sie and Son g [12], rep rocessed by the author Figure 4 shows the disaster risk analysis in cultural heritage, it is suggested by this research in order to facilitate the cultural heritage e me rgency response decision ma king. FIGURE 4 FLOW OF CULTURAL EMERGENCY RESP ONSE Source: Chien Lien, Sie and Son g [12], rep rocessed by the author 3.6. CommunityResilience that Reflected inCultural Heritage Definition of Interest Risk An alysis Current State Record In Contrast To The Goal Y es N o List Needs and Rescue Priority Needs Will Be Held Result Analysi s Differe nt To The Goal Y es N o Regular Checking Expert Survey Cost Benefit Analysi s Collection of Working Tool  Check List  Risk Analysis  Resilience Analysis  Priority Scale Heritage Data Co llection :  Info Herit age  Impor tan t V alues  History of Dis aster  Security  Rescue  Vulnerab ill ity BPBD (Regional Disaster Management Agency) BPCB (Cultural Heritage Preserv ation Agency ) Security: TNI and UPT (Technical Implementation Unit) E vacuati on: Academics Relev ance Agencies, Priv ate and Community TTDCB (Cultural Heritage Emergency Response Team) SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 38 The results of cultural heritage identification can be seen in table 5. It s hows that in prehistoric human settlements is built with the aim of adaptation to the threats of nature in the form o f wild an ima l attacks. At the megalithic e ra when human has started to understand the concept of living, great building has made, the remains left are pedestals, menhirs and stone tombs. Using the technology of stone slabs and cobblestone the remains showed their efforts to maintain the condition of the building related to shocks, this indicates that in the past people had tried to adapt to the threat of earthquakes. TABLE 5 IDENT IFICATION OF RESILIENCE BASED ON SAMPLES OF CULT URAL P ROP ERTIES IN YOGYAKARTA P ROVINCE Cultural Heritage Resilience Analysis Resilience M ovable Heritage Pickaxe Iconogr ap hy Ceramics Sp ecie M onumental Jewellery Pip isan dan M ortar Decorative Architectural a. Ump ak Based on morp hological an aly sis p edestals p rehistory have noticed shocks seen from the stone as a counterweight Earthquake b. Stone Tomb M orp hological for ms infused gr ave stone with stone construction Earthquake Cultural Heritage Resilience Analysis Resilience p lates are arranged well as how to create a solid rock tomb. c. M enhir M orp hology form of menhirs emb edded in the ground with the amp lifier rock on the right and left as strenght M enhir. Earthquake c. Plinth Statue The technology to manufacture the p linth statue in M ataram p eriod showed adap tation to shocks, as seen from the connection stones and the key stone Earthquake d. Statue Arca made with andesite intact with material r eduction technology . Heavy statues will strengthen the standing p osition of the shock. Earthquake Decorative Ornamental Shale Bar Stup ika Tablet Earthenware Immovable Heritage Iconogr ap hy Structure a. Tomb The orientation of the tomb of the north south and is located on a h igh hill has been the continuity tomb Earthquakes, landslides, tsunamis and floods SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 39 Cultural Heritage Resilience Analysis Resilience b. M onument Develop ment of the region durin g the colonial day s notice tsunami threat not visible from the construction of the southern coast Tsunami Buildin g a. Temp le M eru shap ed temp le, continued technolo gy vertical, horizontal dial, false arch and key stone is strengthening temp le from shocks. The p resence of a thin p rotective cement on the temp le. Earthquake and Disaster Erup tion b. M osque Continuing technological p rehistory and Hindu M ataram seen from the p illar, kori agung, roof overlap p ing, connectin g vertical and hor izontal technology and was created on the flat ground Earthquakes and landslides b. Gate Wearin g the great kori system in crowded p laces this attention to human security The earthquake and the evacuation of the east and west orientation c. Church Noting shocks in buildin g a lar ge sp ace Earthquakes d. Palace During the Hindu M ataram Ratu Boko p alace was built with Landslide, Drought disaster, Cultural Heritage Resilience Analysis Resilience attention to the structure of the landslide. Sp atial Keraton Yogy akarta is located at the midp oint between M erap i and the South Coast Erup tion and Tsunami disaster (at the time of Islam) e.Pagod a Wearin g techno lo gy as a crutch teak roof of the boat Earthquake f. School Build with various iron p ole, thick walls with lar ge door windows Earthquake and Fire g. Factory Wall h efty Earthquake h. House Wall h efty Earthquake i. Gutter M ataram ditch built with attention to north- south flow of water that are not accommodated Drought Site a. Cave Goa Braholo is a settlement that takes into account environmental threats The threat of early man, in the form of wild animal attacks. b. Various Site Geograp hically p lacement of the buildin g on the Hindu- Buddha of the environment Have their risk analy sis Region a. Prambanan temp le There has been a chan ge of lo cation Have their disaster risk reduction p lan by SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 40 Cultural Heritage Resilience Analysis Resilience relocatin g the temp le in the p ast b. Guest Houses Already very modern with a trop ical adap tation. The p resence of light roof and p laster on the slop es Erup tion and landslides Source: Author fro m field observations In the later period, na me ly the Hindu Matara m, quantum leap in terms of technology has occurred. The construction materia ls used are made fro m andesite stone which considered sacred at that time. Andesite stone is heavy, it requires modifications and adaptations to be able to utilize as building materia ls. The technology to assemble the stone building then developed in the form o f keystone, vertical join, horizontal join, pseudo curved, sand foundation and cement coating for bu ild ings. The technology mentioned above was adapted to mitigate earthquakes and landslides, while the thin cement is used as a coating to protect building fro m da mage due to mount Merapi eruptions. Period of Matara m Isla m is a continuation o f the classical period of Mataram Hindu, at this time more advanced technology was found . Not only the concept of environmental wisdom, butalso structural mit igation technology became more advanced than ever before. The concept of pillar, a vertical join, horizontal join, overlapping roofs, k ori agung arches are a showing their attempt to deal with the earthquake. Even very safe position of the palace showed the consideration to protect from volcano eruption and tsunami that comes fro m the south side. In colonial period, the colonia l government al ready consider the great potential of south coast related to tsunami. In addition to the hazard fro m mount Merapi eruption and earthquakes , in this period, windows and doors are made in large sizeto mitigate fire hazard, and combine with thick wallwill beca me safe when anearthquake strike . 3.7. Utilization of Cultural Heritage Objects in Yogyak arta Province All of the positive things above shows the richness values that inherited as cultural heritage in Indonesia. Cultura l resource management is needed to preserve these heritage so those values can be inherited to future generations. Being an area that prone to disaster, Yogyakarta province need to embed its cultural resource manage ment and disaster management. Further research opportunities and challenges is needed in order to uncover the past history of Indonesia known as the archipelago. The study can be used as identity reinforce ment that can be deployed through forma l or informal education such as excursions. The main objective of the cultural heritage utilizat ion is to strengthen national identity. Utilization of cultural heritage in Yogyakarta province should be done not only aimed to increase number of tourists , but to pursue quality. National resilience is derived fro m the resilience of individuals, fa milies, commun ity, region and state. To achieve this, regulations that consider the content and the concept of panca gatrais needed, not only strengthen the economy but to keep the balance of all gatra, namely the ideological, politica l, econo mic , social, cu ltural and defence. IV. CONCLUSIONS A ND RECOMM ENDAT IONS 4.1 Conclusions Imple mentation of cultural resources management of Yogyaka rta province have not been integrated with disaster manage ment. It resulted in poor imp le mentation of disaster risk reduction in the preservation of cultural heritage. On the other hand Yogyakarta provincia l disaster management plans also have not entered the cultural heritage as an important ele ment. In accordance with the mandate of Law No. 4 in 2007 that cultural heritage is include in the category of a national asset which should be protected and secured. Derivatives of these problems is the lack of cultural heritage SINERGI , Volume 7, Nomor 2 MARET 2017 Deffi Ayu P uspito Sari, P h.D1), Rizky Afriono, M.Si.(Han)²) - THE INTEGRAT ION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AT SPECIAL REGION P ROVINCE OF YOGYAKARTA 41 consideration in the contingency plan, the absence of strong lin kages between relevant agencies, the lack of mitigation, eme rgency response, and assessment of cultural heritage during disaster. In prehistoric times commun ity has adapted to threats that exist at that time , like a wild anima l, but already there is also understanding the structure of earthquake-resistant buildings. At the time of the Hindu Mataram knowledge of disaster adaptation can be seen from the technology used , for e xa mple the keystone, vertical join, horizontal join, and cement coatings to mit igate various hazard such as earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic eruption. At the time of Islamic Matara m, knowledge to adapt to tsunami began to appeared, for those palace of Yogyakarta in placed in a safe position from the hazard of mount Merapi eruption and tsunami fro m the south sea. Technology in the Islamic period is the continuation of the previo us period, another e xa mple of co mmun ity resilience related to cultural heritage isin colonial period, colonial style building is a very solid structure against earthquakes and other disasters, windows and doors are made in large size to mitigate fire haza rd, it is worth to notice that in this period concept of safety is already considered in build ing construction. There is less attention to the utilization of cultural heritage to strengthen national identity and security. As the development of tourism is more oriented in increasing quantity. Cultural heritage is a physical object, but it contains the non-physical values , to maintain those values is a form of prudent utilizat ion that not mere ly fro m the viewpoint of economic standpoint. 4.2 Recommendation Suggestion of this research is the need for integration of cultural heritage in disaster manage ment. This integration is the main solution to improve the handling of cultural heritage as a whole. In this study, researchers recommend the table the integration between disaster manage ment and the management of cultura l resources, the flow of risk analysis of cultural heritage as that can be performed on all stagesof disaster management, and the structure of the eme rgency response of cultural heritage. REFERENCES [1] BPBD DIY.(2013). Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yo gy akarta: BPBD DIY hal. 22-23 [2] http ://p urbakalay ogy a.com/p otensi-y ogy akarta.htmlaccessed at January 2, 2016 [3] BNPB (2013). Rencana Penanggulangan Ben cana Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 2013-2017. Jakarta: BNPB [4] Wahy uni, Sri. (2012). Qualitative Research Method: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Penerb it Salemba Emp at. p age 1. [5] Soegiy ono. (2012). Metode Pen elitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alf abeta. p age 225 [6] Puslitarkenas. (2008). M etode Penelitian Arkeolo gi: Indonesia: Puslitarkenas. p age 39-81 [7] DPR RI.(2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Penaggulangan Ben cana No.4 Tahun 2007. Jakarta: DPR- RI.p asal 1ay at 1 [8] DPR RI (2010). Undang-Undang Republik Indon esia No.11 Tahun 2010 Tentang Cagar Budaya.Jakarta: DPR RI Bab1 Pasal1 [9] IOM . (1998). M odule BI-4/C Protection of Cultural Heritage. Handbook. IOM . [10] IM curWG. (2009). International M ilitary Cultural Resources Workin g Group [11] IFRC. (2007). Disaster Response and Contingency Planning Guide.Geneva: IFRC.p age 6 [12] Chien, Lien, Sie dan Son g (2011). Disaster Risk Assesment Methods andResponse Plans for Cultural Heritage in Taiwan. Touy uan: University of Touy uan http://purbakalayogya.com/potensi-yogyakarta.html