ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Medical writing support was provided by Prescott Medical Communications Group (Chicago, IL) with financial support from Ortho Dermatologics; Ortho Dermatologics is a division of Bausch Health US, LLC • Presented at The Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference for PAs and NPs • June 3-5, 2022 • Scottsdale, AZ

SYNOPSIS 

 � Truncal acne (occurring on the chest and back) is 
common among patients with facial acne,1-3 
though its pathophysiology may be somewhat 
different4,5

 � As there are no specific guidelines for the 
treatment of truncal acne, facial acne treatment 
guidelines are often the basis for its management3

 � Successful treatment of truncal acne is 
complicated by the involvement of a large body 
surface area that is typically covered in clothing3

 � Topical vehicles that provide ease of spreadability, 
rapid cutaneous penetration/effective drug 
delivery, and lack of residue are highly desirable 
for truncal acne treatment1

 � A lower-dose tazarotene 0.045% lotion 
formulation (Arazlo®; Ortho Dermatologics) was 
developed utilizing polymeric emulsion 
technology (Figure 1)6

• This highly spreadable lotion formulation was 
developed to allow for more efficient delivery of 
tazarotene into dermal layers

• In phase 1 studies, this lotion demonstrated low 
irritation/contact dermatitis potential and no 
allergic sensitization7

OBJECTIVES

 � Study 1: to summarize the efficacy, safety, and 
tolerability of tazarotene 0.045% lotion in the 
treatment of truncal acne 

 � Study 2: to evaluate the spreadability of 
tazarotene 0.045% lotion and trifarotene 0.005% 
cream on the trunk

FIGURE 1.  Polymeric Emulsion Technology for 
Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion

1-2 μm
①

②

③

① Polymeric matrix holds water and water-soluble 
      hydrating agents within a 3-D mesh

② Droplets of tazarotene and oil-soluble 
      moisturizing agents  held apart by the 3-D mesh

③ 3-D mesh allows for uniform distribution of 
      tazarotene and moisturizing agents

STUDY 2: SPREADABILITY 
Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion vs Trifarotene 0.005% Cream8

Study 2 Design

• Double-blind split-body study of 30 healthy adults (18–59 years)
• Each product (0.1 mL) was applied to a 10 cm wide area on one side of participants’ backs and 
   moved down the back until it would no longer spread; area of spread was then determined

160

0

40

80

120

167.0

Tazarotene
0.045%
Lotion

M
e
a
n
 A

re
a
 o

f 
P

ro
d

u
ct

 S
p

re
a
d

 (
cm

2
)

130.3

200

Trifarotene
0.005%
Cream

Tazarotene 
0.045% Lotion

Trifarotene 
0.005% Cream

Mean Spreadability of Tazarotene 
Lotion and Trifarotene Cream (N=30) Participant example

***P<0.001 vs trifarotene 0.005% cream.

Mean
difference:
36.7 cm2

• On average, 
   skin coverage 
   with tazarotene 
   0.045% lotion 
   was ~30% 
   greater than 
   with trifarotene 
   0.005% cream

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion for Truncal Acne: Efficacy, Safety, and Spreadability
Leon H Kircik, MD1-3; Zoe D Draelos, MD4; Eric Guenin, PharmD, PhD, MPH5
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; 2Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; 3Physicians Skin Care, PLLC, DermResearch, PLLC, and Skin Sciences, PLLC, Louisville, KY; 4Dermatology Consulting Services, PLLC, High Point, NC; 5Ortho Dermatologics, Bridgewater, NJ*
*Ortho Dermatologics is a division of Bausch Health US, LLC

FIG

CONCLUSIONS
 � Tazarotene 0.045% lotion utilizes polymeric emulsion technology to enhance hydration, 
moisturization, and skin barrier function

 � Tazarotene 0.045% lotion led to significant reductions in truncal acne severity and 
lesion counts; ~90% of participants achieved clear or almost clear skin with 12 weeks of 
once-daily use and most participants had no tolerability issues

 � This easy-to-apply tazarotene lotion has sensory and aesthetic properties preferred by 
patients6 and resulted in ~30% greater skin coverage compared with trifarotene cream

• Less product needed to cover the same skin area equals more applications per unit volume

REFERENCES
1. Del Rosso JQ. Cutis. 2006;77:285–289. 
2. Dréno B, et al. JEADV. 2015;29(6):1096–1106.
3. Poli F, et al. JEADV. 2020;34(10):2241–2246. 
4. Short RW, et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 25(1):126–128.

5. Kim BR, et al. Dermatol. 231:87–93.
6. Tanghetti EA, et al. J Dermatol Treat. 2019;Sept 26:1–8.
7. Kircik LH, et al. J Dermatol Treat. 2121;Aug 30:1–9.
8. Draelos ZD, et al. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;21(3):250–257.

AUTHOR DISCLOSURES
Leon H Kircik has acted as an investigator, advisor, speaker, and consultant for Ortho Dermatologics. Zoe D Draelos received funding from Ortho Dermatologics 
to conduct the research presented here. Eric Guenin is an employee of Ortho Dermatologics and may hold stock and/or stock options in its parent company.

STUDY 1: EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND TOLERABILITY IN TRUNCAL ACNE 
Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion

• Most 
   participants 
   had no 
   tolerability 
   issues
• There were 
   no signi�cant 
   changes 
   from baseline 
   to week 12 
   in any 
   tolerability 
   assessment

Total Lesion Reductions

-100%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%
Baseline Week 4 Week 8 Week 12

LS
 M

e
a
n
 

P
e
rc

e
n
t 

C
h
a
n
g

e
 

F
ro

m
 B

a
se

lin
e

-80%

-44.9%
***

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion (n=19)

-67.7%
***

-82.3%
***

LS mean percent changes from baseline:

IL -49.4%*** -63.8%*** -83.3%***

NIL -7.6%* -59.3%** -64.3%**

Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety

0%

40%

60%

80%

100%

P
e
rc

e
n
ta

g
e
 o

f 
P

a
rt

ic
ip

a
n
ts

20%

BL, baseline. There were no adverse events related to tazarotene treatment in this study.

Clear/Almost Clear Skin

0%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Baseline Week 4 Week 8 Week 12

P
e
rc

e
n
ta

g
e
 o

f 
P

a
rt

ic
ip

a
n
ts

20%

***
21%

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion (n=19)

***
47%

***
89%

Truncal Ef�cacy

*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 vs baseline.
IL, in�ammatory lesions; LS, least squares; NIL, nonin�ammatory lesions.

Severity:        None        Trace        Mild

Patient Preference Questionnaire

Ointment

Cream

Lotion

Spray

Gel

Not all participants responded to all items on the questionnaire; percentages for each item are based upon the number of participants who responded to that item.

Percentage of Participants

6 11 17 67

6 11 67 116

21 32 5 1132

18 29 6 641

53 18 6 1212

Product Rank:        5=Liked Least        4        3        2        1=Liked Best

Ranked Preference for Past Skin Medicines

Percentage of Participants

Ratings of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion

20 40 60 80 100

Percentage of participants rating the lotion as 
“good” or “excellent” compared to other medicines

Easy to Use

Continue Daily
Activities

Large Surface
Area Application

Lotion
Disappears

Soft Skin

0

88%

83%

80%

75%

64%

Study 1 Design

• Participants aged ≥12 years
• Moderate truncal acne 
   (Investigator’s Global 
   Assessment score = 3)
• Once-daily treatment with 
   tazarotene 0.045% lotion 
   for 12 weeks

• Age (mean): 24.1 years
• Sex: 52.6% female
• Race: 52.6% White, 
   36.8% Black, 10.5% Biracial

Demographics

At Week 12:

• ~90% achieved 
   clear or almost 
   clear skin
• >80% reductions 
   from baseline in 
   total lesion counts

BL Wk12

11%

90%
100%

Peeling
BL Wk12

11%

16%

74%

5%

21%

74%

Erythema
BL Wk12

11%

90%
100%

Dryness
BL Wk12

95%

5%

95%

Oiliness

5%

BL Wk12

16%

84%

11%

5%

84%

Pruritus
BL Wk12

5%

95%

11%

5%

84%

Burning

• Overall, participants 
   preferred lotions 
   over other types 
   of topical treatments
• Most participants 
   (64–88%) rated 
   attributes of 
   tazarotene 0.045% 
   lotion as “good” 
   or “excellent” in 
   comparison to 
   other medications