Tapinarof Inhibits the Formation, Cytokine Production, and Persistence of Resident Memory T Cells In Vitro Nathan Mooney,1 Jessica E. Teague,1 Ahmed E. Gehad,1 Kimberly McHale,2 David S. Rubenstein,2 Rachael A. Clark1 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 2Dermavant Sciences, Morrisville, NC, USA BACKGROUND ■ Tapinarof (VTAMA®; Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a first-in-class, non-steroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults,1 and under investigation for the treatment of psoriasis in children down to 2 years of age and for atopic dermatitis in adults and children down to 2 years of age ■ Tapinarof cream 1% once daily treatment has been observed to induce a remittive effect in the phase 3 psoriasis long-term extension trial, PSOARING 32  – Patients who achieved Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of 0 (clear) after topical tapinarof treatment remained clear for a median of ~4 months after therapy was discontinued, defined as a PGA of 0 or 1 (almost clear) while off therapy after achieving complete disease clearance (Figure 1)2 ■ Resident memory T cells (T RM ) drive lesional recurrence in psoriasis and are affected by AhR signaling3–5 ■ AhR binds to toxins, endogenous and exogenous ligands, and has published effects on T cell differentiation6,7 Figure 1. Duration of Remittive Effect Among Patients Entering PSOARING 3 with a PGA Score of 0 (Clear): Maintenance of a PGA Score of 0 or 1 (Almost Clear) While Off Therapy 0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 79 Number of patients at risk Overall 76 58 48 44 33 29 23 19 17 17 17 15 Trial end P ro b a b il it y o f d is e a se w o rs e n in g Time (days) Median time to PGA ≥2 115 days Overall (n=79) PGA, Physician Global Assessment. OBJECTIVE ■ To study the effect of tapinarof on T RM using in vitro assays MATERIALS AND METHODS T Cell Activation and Cytokine Production Assessment ■ Blood-derived T cells were cultured with anti-CD2/CD3/CD28 activation beads for 1 week – Activation was assessed at 24 hours (CD69 expression) – Expression of other markers (CD69, CD103, etc.) was determined after 1 week of culture ■ Cytokine production was quantified using intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry analysis ■ An antigen-presenting cell assay was used to quantify the T RM survival niche in skin cells ■ Dermatomed samples of human skin were cultured in Th17-skewing conditions8 for 3 days, and analyzed for T cell activation (CD107a) and entry into the cell cycle (Ki-67) by immunostaining RESULTS Suppression of Early T Cell Activation and Induction of CD39 Expression ■ A significantly lower proportion of tapinarof-treated T cells (both CD4+ and CD8+ cells; P=0.012) were activated compared with control, following treatment for 24 hours (Figure 2A) ■ Numerically higher proportions of CD4 cells and significantly higher proportions of CD8 cells (P=0.002) expressed CD39 following tapinarof treatment compared with control after 1 week (Figure 2B) Figure 2. Tapinarof Significantly Suppressed Early T Cell Activation After 24 Hours and Induced CD39 Expression After 1 Week of Culture Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f CD4+ A P=0.012 0 10 20 30 Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f CD8+ P=0.012 P=0.002 0 10 20 30 40 A ct iv a te d T c e ll s, % CD 8 + CD 4 + B –75 –50 –25 0 25 C h a n g e , % CD 4 CD 8 0 20 60 40 80 P o si ti v e , % Control Individual donor/data point Tapinarof In Vitro Generation of T RM ■ CD4 T RM formation was significantly reduced (CD69+, P=0.045 and CD69+CD103+, P=0.027) and there was a trend for reduced CD8 T RM formation with tapinarof compared with control (Figure 3) Figure 3. Tapinarof Suppressed CD4 T RM Formation in an In Vitro Culture System Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f CD4 T RM A –200 400 200 0 600 CD69+ P=0.045 Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f –50 100 50 0 150 CD69+CD103+ CD69+CD103+ P=0.027 C e ll s/ 1 0 0 0 v ia b le , n B –100 0 –50 50 69+ 69+/ 103+ C h a n g e i n n u m b e r o f C D 4 T R M , % Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f C –100 200 100 0 300 Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f –500 500 0 1000 C e ll s/ 1 0 0 0 v ia b le , n D –100 0 –50 50 C h a n g e i n n u m b e r o f C D 8 T R M , % CD8 T RM CD69+ 69+ 69+/ 103+ Control Individual donor/data point Tapinarof T RM , resident memory T cell. In Vitro Survival ■ The antigen-presenting cells used IL-32β produced by T cells to induce differentiation of monocytes into OX40L/CD40L-expressing dendritic cells (DC), which may support T cell survival in vitro (Figure 4A) ■ Tapinarof did not inhibit the formation of DC (not shown) but blocked T cell survival, suggesting it may interfere with DC:T cell signaling (Figure 4B) Figure 4. Tapinarof Suppressed T Cell Survival in an In Vitro Antigen-Presenting Cell: T Cell Support Assay 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 0 14 21 IL-32β Days in culture Monocytes Co-stimulatory DC IL-32β CD40L CD40LOX40L OX40L T cell survival in culture V ia b le T c e ll s, n A B IL-32β + DMSO control IL-32β + Tapinarof No IL-32β DC, dendritic cells; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; IL, interleukin. Cytokine Production by In Vitro Generated T RM ■ IL-17A, TNFα, and IFNγ production was reduced among in vitro generated T RM (Figure 5) ■ Non T RM : CD69–CD103–; SP T RM : CD69+CD103–; DP T RM : CD69+CD103+ Figure 5. Tapinarof Suppressed Cytokine Production in CD4 and CD8 T RM Cells Generated In Vitro N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M TapinarofControl CD4+ T cellsA 0 20 10 30 IL-17A N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M 40 80 90 60 50 70 100 TNFα TNFαC C D 4 T c e ll s, % N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M 0 80 20 40 60 100 TNFα C D 8 T c e ll s, % N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M 0 20 10 30 IL-22 N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M 0 40 20 60 IFNα C D 4 T c e ll s, % 0 100 50 150 CD69+ C e ll s, % C D 4 T c e ll s, % C D 4 T c e ll s, % N on T R M SP T R M DP T R M 0 60 20 40 80 IFNα C D 8 T c e ll s, % CD8+ T cellsB SP Control SP Tapinarof 0 100 50 150 CD69+ CD103+ C e ll s, % DP Control DP Tapinarof 40 80 70 60 50 90 Non T RM P=0.018 C e ll s, % DN Control DN Tapinarof IL-17AD –10 20 10 0 30 CD69+ C e ll s, % SP Control SP Tapinarof –20 30 20 10 –10 0 40 CD69+ CD103+ C e ll s, % DP Control DP Tapinarof –2 2 4 6 0 8 Non T RM C e ll s, % DN Control DN Tapinarof DN, double negative; DP, double positive; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; SP, single positive; T RM , resident memory T cell; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. T RM Activation and Proliferation ■ Tapinarof treatment significantly reduced T RM activation (CD107a; P=0.0024) and proliferation (Ki-67; P=0.0067) (Figure 6) Figure 6. Tapinarof Suppressed T RM  Activation and Proliferation in Human Skin CD107a+ P=0.0024 Co nt ro l Ta pi na ro f 0 10 40 C D 1 0 7 a + T c e ll s, % Ta pi na ro f Control Individual sample/data point Tapinarof 20 30 Ki-67+ P=0.0067 Co nt ro l 0 5 25 K i- 6 7 + T c e ll s, % 10 15 20 CONCLUSIONS ■ Our initial results suggest tapinarof: – Reduced early activation in CD4+ and CD8+ blood-derived T cells – Upregulated CD39 on CD4+ and CD8+ blood-derived T cells – Reduced the in vitro generation of CD4+ T RM – Reduced IL-17A, IFNγ, and TNFα production by CD4+ T RM – Reduced T cell survival in an in vitro antigen-presenting cell:T cell support assay – Reduced activation and entry into the cell cycle of T RM in healthy skin cultured under Th17-skewing conditions ■ Additional donors will be tested to confirm statistical significance ■ Future studies will also test the effect of tapinarof in vivo using NSG mice grafted with human skin and infused with allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) ■ The demonstrated effects on T RM may explain the ability of tapinarof to induce a remittive effect in psoriasis clinical trials2 REFERENCES 1. Dermavant Sciences. VTAMA (tapinarof) cream, 1%: US prescribing information. 2022. https://www.vtama.com/ docs/DMVT_VTAMA_PI.pdf. Accessed December 2022. 2. Strober B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:800– 806. 3. Matos TR, et al. J Clin Invest. 2017;127.11:4031–4041. 4. Lefevre MA, et al. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;21:355–360. 5. Zaid A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:5307–5312. 6. Larigot L, et al. Biochim Open. 2018;7:1–9. 7. Quintana FJ, et al. Nature. 2008;453:65–71. 8. Smith SH, et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2110–2119. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dermavant Science, Inc. provided material for these studies under a material transfer agreement. Adult skin samples were generously provided by Drs. Simon G. Talbot, Shailesh Agarwal, and Dennis P. Orgill of the Division of Plastic Surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA. Drs. Qian Zhan and Ira Kim performed immunostaining and analysis for the activation and proliferation experiment. Dr. Yoshinori Watanabe performed the antigen-presenting cell:T cell survival assays. K.M. and D.S.R. are employees of Dermavant Science, Inc. with stock options. R.A.C. has served as a scientific advisory board member for Science Immunology, AnaptysBio, Micreos, and SEDEC Therapeutics. Editorial support under the guidance of the authors was provided by ApotheCom, UK, and was funded by Dermavant Sciences, Inc. in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP) guidelines (Ann Intern Med. 2022;175:1298–1304). Contact Dr Kimberly McHale at kimberly.mchale@dermavant.com with questions or comments.