Patient satisfaction with tildrakizumab treatment in a Phase 4 real-world study of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis Neal Bhatia1, J Gabriel Vasquez2, Brad Schenkel3, Jayme Heim2 1Therapeutics Clinical Research, San Diego, CA, USA; 2West Michigan Dermatology, Grandville, MI, USA; 3Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA INTRODUCTION • Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder that significantly impairs patients’ physical and psychosocial well-being1 • Treatment dissatisfaction among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis is a concern in clinical settings1,2 • Tildrakizumab is an anti–interleukin-23 p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy3 • Limited data are available on patient satisfaction with tildrakizumab treatment in real-world settings OBJECTIVE • To report overall patient satisfaction with specific aspects of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after 64 weeks of treatment with tildrakizumab under real-world conditions METHODS Study design and population • This was a Phase 4, 64-week, uncontrolled, open-label, real-world study (Figure 1) Figure 1. Study design Uncontrolled, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT03718299) Treatment and follow-up Screening (N = 60) Enrollment (N = 55) Key criteria Inclusion • Male or female • ≥18 years • Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasisa • Candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy • No active or untreated latent tuberculosis Exclusion • Erythrodermic psoriasis • Only pustular, guttate, or inverse psoriasis • Other skin conditions that could interfere with evaluation Screening and enrollment Study visit Injection Screening X Week: 0/baseline X X 4 X X 8 X 12 X 16 X X 20 24 28 X X 32 36 40 X X 44 48 52 X X 64 Treatment • Tildrakizumab 100mg administered at Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 16, 28, 40, and 52 • Administered by a healthcare provider Patient Satisfaction Evaluation (ITT population, N = 55) TSQM • Effectiveness • Side Effects • Convenience • Global Satisfaction Tildrakizumab Overall Satisfaction • Improvement in Symptom • Speed of Improvement • Frequency of Dosing • Side Effects Happiness with Psoriasis Control aBSA ≥3%. BSA, body surface area; ITT, intention-to-treat; TSQM, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. Assessments • Patient satisfaction was evaluated using — The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM),4 administered at all postbaseline visits ○ The TSQM includes Effectiveness, Side Effects, Convenience, and Global Satisfaction domains — The Tildrakizumab Overall Satisfaction scale, administered at all postbaseline visits ○ This instrument includes Improvement in Symptoms, Speed of Improvement, Frequency of Dosing, and Side Effects domains — The Patient Happiness with Psoriasis Control instrument, administered at baseline and all postbaseline visits — For all measures, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction Statistical analysis • The intention-to-treat population was used for patient satisfaction analysis and included all patients who enrolled and were assigned to receive tildrakizumab • Changes from baseline in Happiness with Psoriasis Control were analyzed using Student’s t-tests — Missing data were not imputed RESULTS Patient demographics • Of 55 patients enrolled, 45 were assessed at Week 64 (end of study) • The majority of patients were male (28/55; 50.9%) and White (52/55; 94.5%), with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 48.6 ± 15.3 years (Table 1) Table 1. Demographic and baseline characteristics Characteristic Tildrakizumab(N = 55) Sex Female 27 (49.1) Male 28 (50.9) Race White 52 (94.5) Black or African American 2 (3.6) Asian 1 (1.8) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino 5 (9.1) Not Hispanic or Latino 50 (90.9) Age, years, mean ± SD 48.6 ± 15.3 Happiness with Psoriasis Control, mean ± SD 2.7 ± 2.3 ITT population. Data shown as n (%) unless otherwise noted. ITT, intention-to-treat; SD, standard deviation. Figure 2. Mean TSQM domain scores through Week 64 Effectiveness Side Effects Convenience Global Satisfaction 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 79.5 79.2 82.2 81.978.7 77.1 85.2 81.776.5 81.3 85.1 80.559.5 70.8 83.3 72.7 M ea n ± S D T S Q M s co re Week 4 Week 28 Week 52 Week 64 n = 55 53 48 45 6 3 3 3 55 53 48 45 55 53 48 45 ITT population. Error bars represent the SD. ITT, intention-to-treat; TSQM, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication; SD, standard deviation. • The mean ± SD Tildrakizumab Overall Satisfaction domain scores increased from 6.0 ± 2.4 to 8.7 ± 2.0 for Improvement in Symptoms, 5.9 ± 2.4 to 8.3 ± 2.3 for Speed of Improvement, 7.8 ± 2.1 to 9.1 ± 1.7 for Frequency of Dosing, and 8.6 ± 2.1 to 9.6 ± 0.7 for Side Effects (Figure 3) Figure 3. Mean tildrakizumab Overall Satisfaction domain scores through Week 64 Improvement in Symptoms Speed of Improvement Frequency of Dosing Side Effects 0 5 10 15 8.7 8.3 9.1 9.68.4 7.9 8.6 9.58.0 7.8 8.3 9.16.0 5.9 7.8 8.6 n = 55 53 48 45 55 53 48 45 55 53 48 45 55 53 48 45 M ea n ± S D O ve ra ll S at is fa ct io n sc or e Week 4 Week 28 Week 52 Week 64 ITT population. Error bars represent the SD. ITT, intention-to-treat; SD, standard deviation. Figure 4. Mean Happiness with Psoriasis Control score from baseline through Week 64 0 5 10 15 Week 8.5 8.48.2 6.4 2.7 4548535555n = *** * BL 4 28 52 64 M ea n ± S D H ap pi ne ss w ith P so ri as is C on tr ol s co re ITT population. Error bars represent the SD. *P <0.01; statistically significant change from baseline based on Student’s t-test. ITT, intention-to-treat; SD, standard deviation. CONCLUSIONS • Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab in a real-world setting reported improvements in overall satisfaction and across all domains assessed REFERENCES 1) Duffin KC, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(3):672–80. 2) Armstrong AW, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(10):1180–85. 3) ILUMYA® (tildrakizumab-asmn) Injection 100 mg/mL. Full prescribing information. Cranbury, NJ; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 2022. 4) Atkinson MJ, et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the patients for their participation and Dr. Stephen J Rozzo for contributions to the study. This study was funded by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. Medical writing support was provided by Nitish Chaudhari, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, LLC, and funded by Sun Pharma. DISCLOSURES NB is an advisor, consultant, and investigator for AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, Biofrontera, BMS, Brickell, Dermavant, EPI Health, Ferndale, Galderma, Genentech, InCyte, ISDIN, J&J, LaRoche-Posay, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, P&G, Regeneron, Sanofi, Stemline, Sun Pharma, and Verrica. JGV reports nothing to disclose. BS is an employee of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. JH is a speaker, advisor, and consultant for Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis; an advisor for Galderma, Mayne, and Sanofi Regeneron; an advisor and consultant for Ortho Dermatologic; and a speaker and advisor for Sun Pharma. • For the Happiness with Psoriasis Control instrument, the mean ± SD score increased from 2.7 ± 2.3 at baseline to 8.5 ± 2.5 at Week 64, corresponding to “extremely happy” (P <0.001 from Week 4 through Week 64; Figure 4) Efficacy • From Week 4 to Week 64, the mean ± SD TSQM domain scores increased from 59.5 ± 17.0 to 79.5 ± 20.1 for Effectiveness and 72.7 ± 18.6 to 81.9 ± 20.5 for Global Satisfaction, respectively. The Convenience score remained stable from Week 4 to Week 64 (83.3 ± 15.9 to 82.2 ± 16.4, respectively), and ≤6 patients reported side effects (Figure 2)