SKIN 
 

May 2023     Volume 7 Issue 3 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 817 

BRIEF ARTICLE 
 

 

Treatment of Severe Recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis with 
Dupilumab in a Kidney Transplant Patient 
 

Vivian Li, MMS1, Sophie Guenin, MSc2 3, Mark Lebwohl, MD3 

 
1Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, PA 
2New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 
3Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 
 

 

 
 

 
 
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic 
inflammatory skin condition that affects both 
children and adults. Clinical symptoms of AD 
include severe itching, redness, and dry skin. 
AD relapse is driven by genetic 
predisposition and includes altered skin 
barrier function associated with filaggrin gene 
mutation and filaggrin deficiency.1 Type 2 
cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 
play a significant role in the pathogenesis of 
AD. IL-4 has been shown to initiate the Th2 
response while IL-13 maintains the 
response.1 Although topical corticosteroids 
are the first line treatment for AD, systemic 

immunomodulating agents such as 
mycophenolate mofetil or prednisone may be 
used in patients who do not respond well to 
topical therapy or have severe refractory AD.2 

These systemic agents aim to reduce 
cutaneous inflammation and achieve long-
term disease control by disrupting disease 
pathways, leading to reduced lymphocyte 
proliferation; however, these treatments are 
related to notable adverse effects, such as an 
increased risk of infections and the 
occurrence of rebound flares.3,4 This case 
report highlights the unique specificity and 
safety of dupilumab, a biologic agent that 
selectively targets cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13) 
that are crucial in the pathogenesis of AD, in 

ABSTRACT 

This case report highlights the successful treatment of refractory atopic dermatitis (AD) in an 
immunosuppressed patient using dupilumab, a biologic agent that selectively targets 
cytokines crucial in the pathogenesis of AD. The patient had a history of failed treatment with 
numerous topical and systemic immunomodulating agents, including corticosteroids and 
immunosuppressive drugs for organ transplant. Dupilumab treatment resulted in significant 
improvement of symptoms, including reduced pruritus, and ultimately achieved disease 
control. Importantly, the patient experienced no adverse effects apart from one COVID-19 
infection over three years of co-administration of dupilumab with immunosuppressive 
transplant rejection treatment. The safety of dupilumab in immunocompromised and 
transplant patients has been a concern, but studies have shown its safety and efficacy in 
these patient populations. This case highlights the potential for dupilumab as a safe and 
effective treatment option for patients with severe AD who are immunocompromised or have 
undergone solid organ transplantation. 

INTRODUCTION 



SKIN 
 

May 2023     Volume 7 Issue 3 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 818 

successfully treating an immunosuppressed 
patient with refractory AD. 
 

 
 
A 30-year-old male first presented to us with 
severe atopic dermatitis in the context of an 
atopic triad. His past medical history included 
congenital kidney dysplasia and end-stage 
renal disease for which he received three 
kidney transplantations. Of note, he was on 
oral tacrolimus 1.5 mg twice daily, 
mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice daily, 
and prednisone 5 mg daily for transplant 
immunosuppression. His atopic dermatitis 
was inadequately controlled with fluocinonide 
cream and clobetasol, evidenced by the 
presence of pigmented patches, xerosis, 
excoriations, and mild to moderate, 
generalized pruritus throughout the body. 
Over the next year, the patient was treated 
with phototherapy and various topicals, such 
as pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, mometasone, 
and methylprednisolone. Notably, his oral 
transplant anti-rejection medications did not 
adequately treat his AD symptoms.  
 
The following year, the patient presented with 
exacerbation of his AD, asthma, and 
allergies. At this time, his Eczema 
Assessment Severity Index (EASI) score was 
37 and he was initiated on dupilumab 
therapy. The dupilumab treatment consisted 
of an initial 600 mg dose, followed by 300 mg 
dose every two weeks thereafter. Within two 
weeks of his initial treatment, the patient 
reported that his skin had improved 
considerably, and the general level of pruritus 
had reduced significantly.  
 
Physical examination during the patient’s 
follow-up appointment three months later 
showed that his skin was clear, and the 
symptoms of AD had largely disappeared. 
His use of topical treatments for AD is 

minimal, with rare flares controlled with 
topical ruxolitinib. The patient’s EASI score 
was reduced to 0, and he reports a dramatic 
increase in quality of life. Importantly, the 
patient experienced no adverse effects apart 
from one COVID-19 infection over three 
years of co-administration of dupilumab with 
immunosuppressive transplant rejection 
treatment. 
 

 
 
Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that 
selectively inhibits the signaling of both IL-4 
and IL-13, key drivers of the inflammatory 
response in atopic dermatitis, by binding to 
their shared receptor alpha subunit.5 This 
blocks downstream signaling and ultimately 
decreases the Th2-driven inflammatory 
response to help reduce skin inflammation 
and improve skin barrier function.5 
Dupilumab is approved for the treatment of 
moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.5 
Patients in the dupilumab clinical trials 
reported 75% or greater improvement from 
their baseline EASI score over the course of 
sixteen weeks, relief from pruritus, and 
enhanced quality of life.5 

 
Although our patient was on an 
immunosuppressive organ transplant 
regimen, his AD remained uncontrolled. 
Mycophenolate mofetil inhibits the 
proliferation of T and B cells thereby, 
reducing the production of cytokines that 
contribute to inflammatory pathways.6 
Similarly, oral tacrolimus functions by forming 
a complex with FKBP-12 to inhibit the 
downstream effects of calcineurin, a key 
enzyme responsible for T-cell activation.7 
Prednisone, a corticosteroid, broadly 
suppresses the immune system.8 However, 
despite a robust combination of 
immunosuppressive therapies, our patient’s 
AD failed to respond.  

CASE REPORT 

DISCUSSION 



SKIN 
 

May 2023     Volume 7 Issue 3 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 819 

The safety of dupilumab in 
immunocompromised and transplant patients 
has been a concern due to the potential risk 
of infections and impaired immune function. 
However, Lukac et al. conducted a study 
which demonstrated the safety of dupilumab 
in these patient populations.9 Other studies 
have also reported successful use of 
dupilumab in patients with AD and underlying 
primary immunodeficiency disorders, such as 
X-linked agammaglobulinemia and hyper IgE 
syndrome.10,11 The risk of infections with 
dupilumab appears to be similar to that of 
placebo, and there have been no reports of 
opportunistic infections or reactivation of 
latent infections.12 Demonstrated by our 
patient, dupilumab can be considered as a 
safe and effective treatment option for 
patients with severe AD who are 
immunocompromised or have undergone 
solid organ transplantation. 
 
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Vivian Li and 
Sophie Guenin have no conflicts of interest. Mark 
Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai and receives 
research funds from: Abbvie, Amgen, Arcutis, 
Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, 
Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Inozyme, 
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Novartis, 
Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc.  
Dr. Lebwohl is also a consultant for AnaptysBio, 
Arcutis, Inc., Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea 
Therapeutics, Avotres Therapeutics, BioMX, 
Boehringer-Ingelheim, Brickell Biotech, Castle 
Biosciences, Corevitas, Dermavant Sciences, 
Evommune, Inc., Facilitatation of International 
Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, 
Foundation for Research and Education in 
Dermatology, Hexima Ltd., Meiji Seika 
Pharma, Mindera, National Society of Cutaneous 
Medicine, New York College of Podiatric Medicine, 
Pfizer, Seanergy, SUN Pharma, Verrica, and Vial. 
 
Funding: None 
 
Corresponding Author: 
Vivian Li, MMS 
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine 
Erie, PA 
Email: livivian23@gmail.com 

 

 
References: 
1. Dubin C, Del Duca E, Guttman-Yassky E. The IL-

4, IL-13 and IL-31 pathways in atopic dermatitis. 
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021;17(8):835-852. 
doi:10.1080/1744666X.2021.1940962 

2. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, et al. 
Guidelines of care for the management of atopic 
dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment 
with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am 
Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327-349. 
doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030 

3. Sidbury R, Kodama S. Atopic dermatitis 
guidelines: Diagnosis, systemic therapy, and 
adjunctive care. Clin Dermatol. 2018;36(5):648-
652. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.05.008 

4. Davari DR, Nieman EL, McShane DB, Morrell 
DS. Current Perspectives on the Systemic 
Management of Atopic Dermatitis. J Asthma 
Allergy. 2021;14:595-607. Published 2021 Jun 1. 
doi:10.2147/JAA.S287638 

5. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. 
Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo 
in Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 
2016;375(24):2335-2348. 
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1610020 

6. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, et al. 
Guidelines of care for the management of atopic 
dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment 
of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am 
Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116-132. 
doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023 

7. Cross SA, Perry CM. Tacrolimus once-daily 
formulation: in the prophylaxis of transplant 
rejection in renal or liver allograft 
recipients. Drugs. 2007;67(13):1931-1943. 
doi:10.2165/00003495-200767130-00012 

8. Siegels D, Heratizadeh A, Abraham S, et al. 
Systemic treatments in the management of atopic 
dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. Allergy. 2021;76(4):1053-1076. 
doi:10.1111/all.14631 

9. Lukac D, Pagani K, McGee JS. Overview of use, 
efficacy, and safety of dupilumab in complex 
patients: a retrospective, case-series study from 
a large, urban academic center [published online 
ahead of print, 2022 Jun 18]. Arch Dermatol Res. 
2022;10.1007/s00403-022-02362-y. 
doi:10.1007/s00403-022-02362-y 

10. Fan YH, Lin TL, Sun HL, Pan HH, Ku MS, Lue 
KH. Successful treatment of atopic dermatitis 
with dupilumab in the setting of X-linked 
agammaglobulinemia. J Allergy Clin Immunol 
Pract. 2022;10(11):3032-3034.e1. 
doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.026 



SKIN 
 

May 2023     Volume 7 Issue 3 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 820 

11. Wang HJ, Yang TT, Lan CE. Dupilumab 
treatment of eczema in a child with STAT3 hyper-
immunoglobulin E syndrome. J Eur Acad 
Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(5):e367-e369. 
doi:10.1111/jdv.17889 

12. Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, et 
al. Long-term management of moderate-to-
severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and 
concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD 
CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-
blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 
2017;389(10086):2287-2303. 
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1