SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 952 COMPELLING COMMENTS Patch-Type Granuloma Annulare with Clinical and Histological Features of Morphea: A True Overlap? Carlie Reeves, BA, MS1, Lauryn M Falcone, MD, PhD2, Colleen J Beatty, MD2, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD2, Joseph English III, MD2 1 University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 2 Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA GA is a chronic granulomatous disorder that usually presents as erythematous papules or plaques in an annular arrangement1. Histologically, GA is characterized by mucin deposition, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, and degeneration of collagen2. Numerous inciting factors for GA have been reported, including viruses, arthropods, HIV, and Borrelia infection1. GA often spontaneously resolves and is mostly a cosmetic concern to patients. However, some forms of GA are associated with systemic disease, such as generalized GA and diabetes mellitus (DM)3. Patch-type GA is a distinct variant of this condition, presenting with large asymptomatic annular plaques4. This peculiar GA type is often misdiagnosed with other dermatoses, more commonly tinea, morphea, or mycosis fungoides. Histopathologically, it also differs from classical GA, closely resembling inflammatory stages of morphea and interstitial granulomatous dermatitis of autoimmune disease, and interstitial drug eruption4. Herein, we described a case of patch-type GA with overlapping features of morphea and discuss the existing literature of the topic. A 67-year-old woman with a past medical history of essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia was evaluated in an outpatient dermatology clinic for an asymptomatic, erythematous rash on the trunk and legs that had been worsening ABSTRACT A 67-year-old woman was evaluated for a worsening asymptomatic rash located on her torso, back, and legs. She denied any chills or fevers and reported feeling otherwise well. Clinically, large brownish, slightly atrophic plaques were seen on the torso suggestive of either morphea or a granulomatous condition. Histopathologic examination revealed an increase in interstitial histiocytes infiltrating between altered collagen fibers, palisaded granulomas with increased mucin, suggestive of granuloma annulare (GA), as well as dermal sclerosis, perineural infiltrates with plasma cells and diminished CD34 counts, that are more typical for localized scleroderma/morphea. Morphea and patch-type GA may be indistinguishable clinically and share some histopathological features. This case demonstrates similarities between these conditions and features of both conditions in the same patient. INTRODUCTION CASE REPORT SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 953 Figure 1. (A): Clinical photograph of left breast exhibiting erythematous skin with sharp border (B): Clinical photograph exhibiting erythematous, annular patches of various sizes, located mostly on the lateral back. Some patches demonstrate central clearing (arrow) (C): Clinical photograph of erythematous, confluent patches that cover the majority of the right side and axilla (D): Clinical photograph of the medial torso featuring a large erythematous patch with sharp borders. SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 954 Figure 2. (A): Marked sclerosis and thickened collagen bundles of the superficial and mid dermis zone (zone A) with foci of interstitial granulomatous infiltrate (zone B) and zones of perineural inflammation (zone C), Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x40. (B) Higher magnification of the interstitial granulomatous infiltrate and homogenized collagen, Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x200. (C): Higher magnification of perineural infiltrate with collections of plasma cells, Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x200. (D): Increased amount of interstitial mucin, Alcian Blue stain, x100. (E): Loss of CD34 immunostain in the superficial dermis, CD34 immunostain, x100. SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 955 over the previous 6 to 8 months (Figure 1). The rash was characterized by large, non- scaly, brownish patches with central atrophy/clearing. Laboratory evaluation was notable for low vitamin D levels. Lyme disease antibodies were negative. Punch biopsies from the lower back and abdomen revealed significant thickening of the dermal fibers with homogenization in the superficial dermis and thickened fat septae. There was an interstitial infiltrate of spindled histiocytes infiltrating between swollen collagen fibers, and focally increased interstitial mucin. Scattered rare eosinophils were also noted as well as perineural plasma rich cell infiltrate. In addition, there is extensive sclerosis of the superficial and middle dermis with diminished CD34 counts (Figure 2). Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain was used to identify any fungal microorganisms and basement membrane changes, both of which were absent. The patient was diagnosed with interstitial GA and possible morphea overlap and started on methotrexate 15 mg per week. The rash showed significant improvement on methotrexate after three months. Patch-type GA is a poorly described entity. The largest clinic-morphological study of patch GA by Khanna et al demonstrates the challenges in diagnosing this condition4. Histopathologically, it was described to have unique features including predominantly interstitial infiltrate and presence of eosinophils and plasma cells4. The authors mention that these features were not previously described in the previous reports of patch-type GA and are usually considered features of morphea. We, additionally, found the presence of perineural infiltrates with plasma cells previously described as features of morphea5. Interestingly, coexisting morphea and GA was described in a few reports in the literature. The first known case described a 62-year-old patient with linear morphea on pretibial surfaces and GA on the medial thigh6. Two more patients were reported in 1999: one patient had GA on the thigh and morphea on the chest; the second patient had morphea on the right breast and lateral back and GA on the inner thigh and right shoulder2. A third report from 2019 describes a patient with morphea on the lower limbs and GA on the abdomen and dorsum of the feet7. Another interesting case report described the development of morphea after granulomatous fasciitis induced by Lyme8. It has been suggested that the coexistence of these conditions may be due to a common etiological link such as autoimmunity or previous injury6. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) may be increased in up to half of all cases of morphea9. However, this is a non- specific finding as even healthy individuals can have a positive ANA. In our patient, ANA was negative. Scleroderma and centromere B antibodies, which are ANAs specific for systemic sclerosis, were also within normal limits10. In regard to previous injury, studies have shown that repeated friction, as occurs along the bra line and waistband area, may play a role in morphea developing at those susceptible sites11. Our patient had patches along the underside of the breast which frequently contacts the bra lining (Figure 1- D). However, our patient also had more diffuse involvement across her back and chest in areas that would not be subject to repetitive friction. Our patient had several comorbidities that may be risk factors for developing GA, DISCUSSION SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 956 including diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperlipidemia. A 2021 study investigated the findings of 5,137 patients with GA. Investigators reported that 21% of patients with GA had DM compared to the 13% seen in the control group. A larger percentage of patients with GA had hyperlipidemia compared to the control group (33% vs 28%)12. This study suggested that DM and hyperlipidemia may predispose one to GA through T-cell dysregulation. Other studies have found T-helper 1 cells (Th1), T-helper 2 cells (Th2), and the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway to be implicated in dysregulation of GA13. Increased expression of cytokines corresponding to the T-cell axes were noted; this is particularly true for IL-4 mRNA (corresponding to the Th2 pathway), which exhibited a 15,600-fold increase in GA lesions versus control skin13. An interesting finding shared by GA and morphea is that both exhibit alterations in collagen and CD34 loss2,14,6. It has been proposed that the collagen degeneration seen in GA is mediated by M1 macrophages, a type of macrophage that initiates inflammation15. Inflammation is then followed by an M2 macrophage mediated response, resulting in mucin deposition15. Collagen degeneration can be analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for CD34. CD34 is a marker for vascular endothelial progenitors16. Endothelial cell damage has been proposed as an inciting factor in developing morphea17. An important finding in morphea is the loss of CD34 dermal dendritic cells (DDCs)18. This CD34 loss is also seen in GA18. Findings from an investigation that analyzed 50 skin lesions from patients with morphea suggest that a phenotypic change of CD34+ DDCs to smooth muscle actin positive (SMA) myofibroblasts is responsible for the disease extent and fibrosis in morphea19. Because CD34 counts are decreased in both morphea and GA, phenotypic changes of CD34+ DDCs could play a role in the overlapping nature as seen in our patient. However, it is rare for GA and morphea to occur in the same patient and even more rare for the diseases to occupy the same location. Thus, more studies are needed to further discuss what etiological link, if any, may connect these two disorders. To conclude, we report a case of patch-type granuloma annulare with clinical and histopathological features of morphea. This case presents a challenging clinical and pathologic differential diagnosis and raises the possibility of an overlap of these two conditions. Further studies are needed to better elucidate what etiologic link, if any, exists between these two entities. Consent: All ethical standards have been maintained. Patient gave consent to the production of this manuscript. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None Funding: None Corresponding Author: Carlie Reeves, BA, MS University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, MS Email: creeves4@umc.edu References: 1. Schmieder SJ, Harper CD, Schmieder GJ. Granuloma Annulare. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; April 18, 2022. 2. Ben-Amitai D, Hodak E, Lapidoth M, David M. Coexisting morphoea and granuloma annulare- are the conditions related? Clin Exp Dermatol. 1999 Mar;24(2):86-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2230.1999.00425.x. PMID: 10233660. 3. Agrawal P, Pursnani N, Jose R, Farooqui M. Granuloma annulare: A rare dermatological manifestation of diabetes mellitus. J Family Med CONCLUSION mailto:creeves4@umc.edu SKIN July 2023 Volume 7 Issue 4 (c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 957 Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3419-3421. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_616_19. PMID: 31742181; PMCID: PMC6857419. 4. Khanna U, North JP. Patch-type granuloma annulare: An institution-based study of 23 cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2020 Sep;47(9):785-793. doi: 10.1111/cup.13707. Epub 2020 Apr 27. PMID: 32279342. 5. Dhaliwal CA, MacKenzie AI, Biswas A. Perineural inflammation in morphea (localized scleroderma): systematic characterization of a poorly recognized but potentially useful histopathological feature. J Cutan Pathol. 2014 Jan;41(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/cup.12242. Epub 2013 Oct 24. PMID: 24117981. 6. Holmes RC, Meara RH. Morphoea, sclerotic panatrophy and disseminated granuloma annulare. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1983 Mar;8(2):201- 3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1983.tb01767.x. PMID: 6851242. 7. Ağırgöl Ş, Yöntem Ö, Leblebici C, Akbulut TÖ, Demir FT, Türkoğlu Z. Coexistence of morphea and granuloma annulare: a rare case report. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019 Jan-Feb;137(1):96-99. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0091060617. Epub 2017 Nov 17. PMID: 29166431. 8. Christensen A, Di Loreto C, Smitaman E, Paravar T, Jones KA, Guma M. Granulomatous fasciitis followed by morphea profunda: Is granulomatous fasciitis part of a spectrum of deep morphea? A case report and review of the literature. Clin Case Rep. 2018 Jun 4;6(8):1412-1417. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1608. PMID: 30147873; PMCID: PMC6098999. 9. Adigun R, Goyal A, Hariz A. Systemic Sclerosis. 2022 May 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. PMID: 28613625. 10. Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, Rudnicka L. Antinuclear Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: an Update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020 Feb;58(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018- 8718-8. PMID: 30607749. 11. Grabell D, Hsieh C, Andrew R, Martires K, Kim A, Vasquez R, Jacobe H. The role of skin trauma in the distribution of morphea lesions: a cross- sectional survey of the Morphea in Adults and Children cohort IV. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Sep;71(3):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 28. PMID: 24880663; PMCID: PMC4135004. 12. Barbieri JS, Rosenbach M, Rodriguez O, Margolis DJ. Association of Granuloma Annulare With Type 2 Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, Autoimmune Disorders, and Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jul 1;157(7):817-823. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1805. PMID: 34106218; PMCID: PMC8190702. 13. Min MS, Wu J, He H, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Del Duca E, Zhang N, Renert-Yuval Y, Pavel AB, Lebwohl M, Guttman-Yassky E. Granuloma annulare skin profile shows activation of T-helper cell type 1, T-helper cell type 2, and Janus kinase pathways. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jul;83(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.028. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 31870914. 14. Jindal R, Shirazi N, Chauhan P. Histopathology of morphea: Sensitivity of various named signs, a retrospective study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2020;63:600-3 15. Joshi TP, Duvic M. Granuloma Annulare: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Jan;23(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021- 00636-1. Epub 2021 Sep 8. PMID: 34495491; PMCID: PMC8423598. 16. Sidney LE, Branch MJ, Dunphy SE, Dua HS, Hopkinson A. Concise review: evidence for CD34 as a common marker for diverse progenitors. Stem Cells. 2014 Jun;32(6):1380-9. doi: 10.1002/stem.1661. PMID: 24497003; PMCID: PMC4260088. 17. Sartori-Valinotti JC, Tollefson MM, Reed AM. Updates on morphea: role of vascular injury and advances in treatment. Autoimmune Dis. 2013;2013:467808. doi: 10.1155/2013/467808. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PMID: 24319593; PMCID: PMC3844232. 18. Borretta, Lisa J. MD*,†; Crawford, Richard I. MD*,† CD34 Staining in Disorders of Collagen Degeneration Other Than Morphea, The American Journal of Dermatopathology: August 2020 - Volume 42 - Issue 8 - p 623-624. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001584 19. Lee JS, Park HS, Yoon HS, Chung JH, Cho S. CD34 stromal expression is inversely proportional to smooth muscle actin expression and extent of morphea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Dec;32(12):2208-2216. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15120. Epub 2018 Jul 6. PMID: 29888507.