SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 952 

COMPELLING COMMENTS 
 

 

Patch-Type Granuloma Annulare with Clinical and Histological 
Features of Morphea: A True Overlap? 
 

Carlie Reeves, BA, MS1, Lauryn M Falcone, MD, PhD2, Colleen J Beatty, MD2, Viktoryia 
Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD2, Joseph English III, MD2 

 
1 University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 
2 Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
 

 

 
 

 
 
GA is a chronic granulomatous disorder that 
usually presents as erythematous papules or 
plaques in an annular arrangement1. 
Histologically, GA is characterized by mucin 
deposition, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, and 
degeneration of collagen2. Numerous inciting 
factors for GA have been reported, including 
viruses, arthropods, HIV, and Borrelia 
infection1. GA often spontaneously resolves 
and is mostly a cosmetic concern to patients. 
However, some forms of GA are associated 
with systemic disease, such as generalized 
GA and diabetes mellitus (DM)3. Patch-type 
GA is a distinct variant of this condition, 
presenting with large asymptomatic annular 
plaques4. This peculiar GA type is often 
misdiagnosed with other dermatoses, more 

commonly tinea, morphea, or mycosis 
fungoides. Histopathologically, it also differs 
from classical GA, closely resembling 
inflammatory stages of morphea and 
interstitial granulomatous dermatitis of 
autoimmune disease, and interstitial drug 
eruption4. Herein, we described a case of 
patch-type GA with overlapping features of 
morphea and discuss the existing literature of 
the topic. 
 

 
 
A 67-year-old woman with a past medical 
history of essential hypertension, type 2 
diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia was 
evaluated in an outpatient dermatology clinic 
for an asymptomatic, erythematous rash on 
the trunk and legs that had been worsening  

ABSTRACT 

A 67-year-old woman was evaluated for a worsening asymptomatic rash located on her torso, 
back, and legs. She denied any chills or fevers and reported feeling otherwise well. Clinically, 
large brownish, slightly atrophic plaques were seen on the torso suggestive of either morphea 
or a granulomatous condition. Histopathologic examination revealed an increase in interstitial 
histiocytes infiltrating between altered collagen fibers, palisaded granulomas with increased 
mucin, suggestive of granuloma annulare (GA), as well as dermal sclerosis, perineural 
infiltrates with plasma cells and diminished CD34 counts, that are more typical for localized 
scleroderma/morphea. Morphea and patch-type GA may be indistinguishable clinically and 
share some histopathological features. This case demonstrates similarities between these 
conditions and features of both conditions in the same patient. 

INTRODUCTION 

CASE REPORT 



SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 953 

 
Figure 1. (A): Clinical photograph of left breast exhibiting erythematous skin with sharp border (B): Clinical 
photograph exhibiting erythematous, annular patches of various sizes, located mostly on the lateral back. 
Some patches demonstrate central clearing (arrow) (C): Clinical photograph of erythematous, confluent 
patches that cover the majority of the right side and axilla (D): Clinical photograph of the medial torso 
featuring a large erythematous patch with sharp borders. 

  



SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 954 

 
Figure 2. (A): Marked sclerosis and thickened collagen bundles of the superficial and mid dermis zone 
(zone A) with foci of interstitial granulomatous infiltrate (zone B) and zones of perineural inflammation 
(zone C), Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x40. (B) Higher magnification of the interstitial granulomatous infiltrate 
and homogenized collagen, Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x200. (C): Higher magnification of perineural infiltrate 
with collections of plasma cells, Hematoxylin Eosin stain, x200. (D): Increased amount of interstitial mucin, 
Alcian Blue stain, x100. (E): Loss of CD34 immunostain in the superficial dermis, CD34 immunostain, x100. 

 

  



SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 955 

over the previous 6 to 8 months (Figure 1). 
The rash was characterized by large, non-
scaly, brownish patches with central 
atrophy/clearing.  
 
Laboratory evaluation was notable for low 
vitamin D levels. Lyme disease antibodies 
were negative. 
 
Punch biopsies from the lower back and 
abdomen revealed significant thickening of 
the dermal fibers with homogenization in the 
superficial dermis and thickened fat septae. 
There was an interstitial infiltrate of spindled 
histiocytes infiltrating between swollen 
collagen fibers, and focally increased 
interstitial mucin. Scattered rare eosinophils 
were also noted as well as perineural plasma 
rich cell infiltrate. In addition, there is 
extensive sclerosis of the superficial and 
middle dermis with diminished CD34 counts 
(Figure 2). Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain 
was used to identify any fungal 
microorganisms and basement membrane 
changes, both of which were absent. The 
patient was diagnosed with interstitial GA and 
possible morphea overlap and started on 
methotrexate 15 mg per week. The rash 
showed significant improvement on 
methotrexate after three months.  
 

 
 
Patch-type GA is a poorly described entity. 
The largest clinic-morphological study of 
patch GA by Khanna et al demonstrates the 
challenges in diagnosing this condition4. 
Histopathologically, it was described to have 
unique features including predominantly 
interstitial infiltrate and presence of 
eosinophils and plasma cells4. The authors 
mention that these features were not 
previously described in the previous reports 
of patch-type GA and are usually considered 
features of morphea. We, additionally, found 

the presence of perineural infiltrates with 
plasma cells previously described as features 
of morphea5. 
 
Interestingly, coexisting morphea and GA 
was described in a few reports in the 
literature. The first known case described a 
62-year-old patient with linear morphea on 
pretibial surfaces and GA on the medial 
thigh6. Two more patients were reported in 
1999: one patient had GA on the thigh and 
morphea on the chest; the second patient 
had morphea on the right breast and lateral 
back and GA on the inner thigh and right 
shoulder2. A third report from 2019 describes 
a patient with morphea on the lower limbs 
and GA on the abdomen and dorsum of the 
feet7. Another interesting case report 
described the development of morphea after 
granulomatous fasciitis induced by Lyme8. 
 
It has been suggested that the coexistence of 
these conditions may be due to a common 
etiological link such as autoimmunity or 
previous injury6. Antinuclear antibodies 
(ANA) may be increased in up to half of all 
cases of morphea9. However, this is a non-
specific finding as even healthy individuals 
can have a positive ANA. In our patient, ANA 
was negative. Scleroderma and centromere 
B antibodies, which are ANAs specific for 
systemic sclerosis, were also within normal 
limits10. In regard to previous injury, studies 
have shown that repeated friction, as occurs 
along the bra line and waistband area, may 
play a role in morphea developing at those 
susceptible sites11. Our patient had patches 
along the underside of the breast which 
frequently contacts the bra lining (Figure 1-
D). However, our patient also had more 
diffuse involvement across her back and 
chest in areas that would not be subject to 
repetitive friction. 
 
Our patient had several comorbidities that 
may be risk factors for developing GA, 

DISCUSSION 



SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 956 

including diabetes mellitus (DM) and 
hyperlipidemia. A 2021 study investigated the 
findings of 5,137 patients with GA. 
Investigators reported that 21% of patients 
with GA had DM compared to the 13% seen 
in the control group. A larger percentage of 
patients with GA had hyperlipidemia 
compared to the control group (33% vs 
28%)12. This study suggested that DM and 
hyperlipidemia may predispose one to GA 
through T-cell dysregulation. Other studies 
have found T-helper 1 cells (Th1), T-helper 2 
cells (Th2), and the Janus kinase-signal 
transducer and activator of transcription 
(JAK-STAT) pathway to be implicated in 
dysregulation of GA13. Increased expression 
of cytokines corresponding to the T-cell axes 
were noted; this is particularly true for IL-4 
mRNA (corresponding to the Th2 pathway), 
which exhibited a 15,600-fold increase in GA 
lesions versus control skin13.  
 
An interesting finding shared by GA and 
morphea is that both exhibit alterations in 
collagen and CD34 loss2,14,6. It has been 
proposed that the collagen degeneration 
seen in GA is mediated by M1 macrophages, 
a type of macrophage that initiates 
inflammation15. Inflammation is then followed 
by an M2 macrophage mediated response, 
resulting in mucin deposition15. Collagen 
degeneration can be analyzed by 
immunohistochemical staining for CD34. 
CD34 is a marker for vascular endothelial 
progenitors16. Endothelial cell damage has 
been proposed as an inciting factor in 
developing morphea17. An important finding 
in morphea is the loss of CD34 dermal 
dendritic cells (DDCs)18. This CD34 loss is 
also seen in GA18. Findings from an 
investigation that analyzed 50 skin lesions 
from patients with morphea suggest that a 
phenotypic change of CD34+ DDCs to 
smooth muscle actin positive (SMA) 
myofibroblasts is responsible for the disease 
extent and fibrosis in morphea19. Because 

CD34 counts are decreased in both morphea 
and GA, phenotypic changes of CD34+ 
DDCs could play a role in the overlapping 
nature as seen in our patient. However, it is 
rare for GA and morphea to occur in the same 
patient and even more rare for the diseases 
to occupy the same location. Thus, more 
studies are needed to further discuss what 
etiological link, if any, may connect these two 
disorders. 
 

 
 
To conclude, we report a case of patch-type 
granuloma annulare with clinical and 
histopathological features of morphea. This 
case presents a challenging clinical and 
pathologic differential diagnosis and raises 
the possibility of an overlap of these two 
conditions. Further studies are needed to 
better elucidate what etiologic link, if any, 
exists between these two entities. 
 
Consent: All ethical standards have been 
maintained. Patient gave consent to the production of 
this manuscript. 
 
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None 
 
Funding: None 
 
Corresponding Author: 
Carlie Reeves, BA, MS 
University of Mississippi Medical Center 
Jackson, MS 
Email: creeves4@umc.edu 

 
 
References: 
1. Schmieder SJ, Harper CD, Schmieder GJ. 

Granuloma Annulare. In: StatPearls. Treasure 
Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; April 18, 2022. 

2. Ben-Amitai D, Hodak E, Lapidoth M, David M. 
Coexisting morphoea and granuloma annulare-
are the conditions related? Clin Exp Dermatol. 
1999 Mar;24(2):86-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-
2230.1999.00425.x. PMID: 10233660. 

3. Agrawal P, Pursnani N, Jose R, Farooqui M. 
Granuloma annulare: A rare dermatological 
manifestation of diabetes mellitus. J Family Med 

CONCLUSION 

mailto:creeves4@umc.edu


SKIN 
 

July 2023     Volume 7 Issue 4 
 

(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. 957 

Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3419-3421. doi: 
10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_616_19. PMID: 31742181; 
PMCID: PMC6857419. 

4. Khanna U, North JP. Patch-type granuloma 
annulare: An institution-based study of 23 cases. 
J Cutan Pathol. 2020 Sep;47(9):785-793. doi: 
10.1111/cup.13707. Epub 2020 Apr 27. PMID: 
32279342. 

5. Dhaliwal CA, MacKenzie AI, Biswas A. Perineural 
inflammation in morphea (localized scleroderma): 
systematic characterization of a poorly 
recognized but potentially useful 
histopathological feature. J Cutan Pathol. 2014 
Jan;41(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/cup.12242. Epub 
2013 Oct 24. PMID: 24117981. 

6. Holmes RC, Meara RH. Morphoea, sclerotic 
panatrophy and disseminated granuloma 
annulare. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1983 Mar;8(2):201-
3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1983.tb01767.x. 
PMID: 6851242. 

7. Ağırgöl Ş, Yöntem Ö, Leblebici C, Akbulut TÖ, 
Demir FT, Türkoğlu Z. Coexistence of morphea 
and granuloma annulare: a rare case report. Sao 
Paulo Med J. 2019 Jan-Feb;137(1):96-99. doi: 
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0091060617. Epub 
2017 Nov 17. PMID: 29166431. 

8. Christensen A, Di Loreto C, Smitaman E, Paravar 
T, Jones KA, Guma M. Granulomatous fasciitis 
followed by morphea profunda: Is granulomatous 
fasciitis part of a spectrum of deep morphea? A 
case report and review of the literature. Clin Case 
Rep. 2018 Jun 4;6(8):1412-1417. doi: 
10.1002/ccr3.1608. PMID: 30147873; PMCID: 
PMC6098999. 

9. Adigun R, Goyal A, Hariz A. Systemic Sclerosis. 
2022 May 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure 
Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. 
PMID: 28613625. 

10. Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, 
Rudnicka L. Antinuclear Antibodies in Systemic 
Sclerosis: an Update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 
2020 Feb;58(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-
8718-8. PMID: 30607749. 

11. Grabell D, Hsieh C, Andrew R, Martires K, Kim A, 
Vasquez R, Jacobe H. The role of skin trauma in 
the distribution of morphea lesions: a cross-
sectional survey of the Morphea in Adults and 
Children cohort IV. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 
Sep;71(3):493-8. doi: 
10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 28. 
PMID: 24880663; PMCID: PMC4135004. 

12. Barbieri JS, Rosenbach M, Rodriguez O, 
Margolis DJ. Association of Granuloma Annulare 
With Type 2 Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, 
Autoimmune Disorders, and Hematologic 
Malignant Neoplasms. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jul 

1;157(7):817-823. doi: 
10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1805. PMID: 
34106218; PMCID: PMC8190702. 

13. Min MS, Wu J, He H, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Del 
Duca E, Zhang N, Renert-Yuval Y, Pavel AB, 
Lebwohl M, Guttman-Yassky E. Granuloma 
annulare skin profile shows activation of T-helper 
cell type 1, T-helper cell type 2, and Janus kinase 
pathways. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 
Jul;83(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.028. 
Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 31870914. 

14. Jindal R, Shirazi N, Chauhan P. Histopathology 
of morphea: Sensitivity of various named signs, a 
retrospective study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 
2020;63:600-3 

15. Joshi TP, Duvic M. Granuloma Annulare: An 
Updated Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, 
and Treatment Options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 
2022 Jan;23(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-
00636-1. Epub 2021 Sep 8. PMID: 34495491; 
PMCID: PMC8423598. 

16. Sidney LE, Branch MJ, Dunphy SE, Dua HS, 
Hopkinson A. Concise review: evidence for CD34 
as a common marker for diverse progenitors. 
Stem Cells. 2014 Jun;32(6):1380-9. doi: 
10.1002/stem.1661. PMID: 24497003; PMCID: 
PMC4260088. 

17. Sartori-Valinotti JC, Tollefson MM, Reed AM. 
Updates on morphea: role of vascular injury and 
advances in treatment. Autoimmune Dis. 
2013;2013:467808. doi: 10.1155/2013/467808. 
Epub 2013 Nov 12. PMID: 24319593; PMCID: 
PMC3844232. 

18. Borretta, Lisa J. MD*,†; Crawford, Richard I. 
MD*,† CD34 Staining in Disorders of Collagen 
Degeneration Other Than Morphea, The 
American Journal of Dermatopathology: August 
2020 - Volume 42 - Issue 8 - p 623-624. doi: 
10.1097/DAD.0000000000001584 

19. Lee JS, Park HS, Yoon HS, Chung JH, Cho S. 
CD34 stromal expression is inversely 
proportional to smooth muscle actin expression 
and extent of morphea. J Eur Acad Dermatol 
Venereol. 2018 Dec;32(12):2208-2216. doi: 
10.1111/jdv.15120. Epub 2018 Jul 6. PMID: 
29888507.