Poster presented at 13th Annual Winter Clinical Dermatology Conference | Maui, HI | January 12 - 17, 2018 Open-Label Study (ARIDO) Evaluating Long-Term Safety of Topical Glycopyrronium Tosylate (GT) in Patients With Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis Dee Anna Glaser,1 Adelaide A. Hebert,2 Alexander Nast,3 William P. Werschler,4 Stephen Shideler,5 Lawrence Green,6 Richard D. Mamelok,7 Janice Drew,8 John Quiring,9 David M. Pariser10 1Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO; 2UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; 3Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 4Premier Clinical Research, Spokane, WA; 5Shideler Dermatology and Skin Care Center, Carmel, IN; 6George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; 7Mamelok Consulting, Palo Alto, CA; 8Dermira, Inc., Menlo Park, CA; 9QST Consultations, Allendale, MI; 10Eastern Virginia Medical School and Virginia Clinical Research, Inc., Norfolk, VA INTRODUCTION • Hyperhidrosis affects an estimated 4.8% of the US population, or approximately 15.3 million people,1 and the impact of hyperhidrosis on quality of life is reported as comparable to, or greater than, psoriasis or eczema2 • Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT; formerly DRM04) is a topical cholinergic receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis in patients ≥9 years of age • GT has been assessed in 2 replicate, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, pivotal phase 3 lead-in trials (ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2) – GT was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in disease severity and reductions in sweat production through 4 weeks in these trials3 • ARIDO (NCT02553798) assessed the long-term safety of GT in a minimum of 100 patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis treated for at least 12 months METHODS Study Design • ARIDO was a 44-week, open-label extension of ATMOS-1 (NCT02530281) and ATMOS-2 (NCT02530294) (Figure 1) • In ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were randomized 2:1 to GT (3.75% topical solution) or vehicle applied once daily to each axilla for 28 days (Figure 1) • Patients who completed ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 with ≥80% treatment compliance were eligible to continue into ARIDO and receive open-label GT for up to 44 weeks or until early termination, including patients terminated once the study objective of 100 patients receiving treatment for ≥12 months was achieved (Figure 1) • Key inclusion criteria for ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 were: – ≥9 years of age (patients <16 years were recruited only at US sites) – Primary axillary hyperhidrosis for ≥6 months – Gravimetrically-measured sweat production of ≥50 mg/5 min in each axilla – Axillary Sweating Daily Diary (ASDD; for patients ≥16 years of age) or ASDD-Children (ASDD-C; for patients <16 years of age) axillary sweating severity item (Item 2) 4 score ≥4 (0 to 10 numeric rating scale) – Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) ≥3 • Key exclusion criteria for ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 were: – History of a condition that could cause secondary hyperhidrosis – Prior surgical procedure or treatment with a medical device for axillary hyperhidrosis – Treatment with iontophoresis within 4 weeks or treatment with botulinum toxin within 1 year for axillary hyperhidrosis – Axillary use of nonprescription antiperspirants within 1 week or prescription antiperspirants within 2 weeks – New or modified psychotherapeutic medication regimen within 2 weeks – Treatment with medications having systemic anticholinergic activity, centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, or beta-blockers within 4 weeks unless dose had been stable ≥4 months and was not expected to change – Conditions that could be exacerbated by study medication Figure 1. Study Design Wk 0 Randomization BASELINEa Wk 4 Wk 49 END OF STUDY Screening Double-BlindTreatment 44-Week Open-Label Extension ARIDO ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2 Target Recruitment (both trials combined): 660 patients randomized 2:1 GT GT 564 (86.6%) patients continued into ARIDO Vehicle Wk 48 aBaseline for ARIDO was Week 0 of ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate; Wk, week Assessments • Primary objective was long-term safety – Safety was evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through Week 45 (Week 44 + 1 week safety follow-up), local skin reactions (LSRs) through Week 44, laboratory testing, vital signs, and physical examinations – TEAEs are summarized overall from the first application of study drug in ARIDO to Week 45 • Descriptive efficacy assessments evaluated in ARIDO were an extension of the primary endpoints in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 – Change from Baseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 in gravimetrically-measured sweat production at Week 44 (up to 48 weeks of GT) – Change from Baseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 in HDSS responder rate (≥2-grade improvement) at Week 44 (up to 48 weeks of GT) • All safety and efficacy analyses were performed on the Safety Population (patients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post-Baseline assessment in ARIDO) RESULTS • The majority of patients (86.6%; N=564) completing ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 (369 patients [65.4%] had received GT, and 195 [34.6%] had received vehicle) continued into ARIDO (Figure 2) • Of the patients enrolled in ARIDO, most patients were female (55.3%) and white (83.3%) with a mean age of 33.0 years and mean BMI of 27.3 kg/m2 (Table 1) • The trial was terminated, per protocol, once study objectives were reached – A total of 226 patients completed 44 weeks of treatment Figure 2. Patient Disposition GT N=426 N=332 (58.9%) GT N=564a (86.6%) N=226 (40.1%) Vehicle N=225 Completed 44 Weeks Completed ATMOS-1 and ATMOS-2N=651 GT N=369 Vehicle N=195 Entered ARIDO Discontinued due to: Lost to follow-up Consent withdrawn Adverse event Noncompliance Pregnancy Protocol violation Physician decision (16.3%) (14.5%) (7.8%) (1.4%) (0.5%) (0.4%) (0.2%) 92 82 44 8 3 2 1 Discontinued due to: Study objectives met/ study terminatedb 106 (18.8%) a14 patients in ARIDO did not have a post-Baseline assessment and were therefore excluded from the Safety Population bSponsor terminated study early, per protocol, when study objective of 100 patients receiving treatment for at least 12 months was achieved GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate Table 1. Demographics and Baselinea Disease Characteristics (Safety Populationb) GT (N=550) Demographics Age (years), mean ± SD 33.0 ± 11.4 Age group, n (%) ≥16 years <16 years 522 (94.9) 28 ( 5.1) Female, n (%) 304 (55.3) White, n (%) 458 (83.3) BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 27.3 ± 5.0 Baseline Disease Characteristics Sweat production (mg/5 min), c mean ± SD 164.7 ± 145.0 HDSS,d,e n (%) Grade 3 Grade 4 348 (63.3) 201 (36.5) Quality of Life DLQI,f mean ± SD CDLQI,g mean ± SD 11.4 ± 5.9 8.9 ± 5.4 aBaseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 bPatients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post-Baseline assessment in ARIDO cGravimetrically-measured average from the left and right axillae dHDSS ≥3 was an inclusion criteria eN=549; 1 subject entered ATMOS-2 with HDSS=2, which was a protocol violation fPatients >16 years of age gPatients ≤16 years of age BMI, body mass index; CDLQI, Children’s DLQI; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate; HDSS, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale; SD, standard deviation Efficacy Assessments • Through Week 44/ET in ARIDO (up to 48 weeks of GT), GT-treated patients continued to demonstrate improvements in efficacy measures, including sweat production and HDSS responder rate (Figure 3) – From Baseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 to Week 44/ET in ARIDO, mean sweat production decreased by 95.7 ± 140.8 mg/5 min, which was maintained from a decrease of 107.6 ± 207.2 mg/5 min in GT-treated patients after 4 weeks in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 (Figure 3A) – At Week 44/ET in ARIDO, HDSS responder rate (≥2-grade improvement) was 63.2%, a further improvement from 59.1% in GT-treated patients at Week 4 in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 • HDSS grade improved by 1, 2, and 3 grades in 30.9%, 46.7%, and 16.5% of patients, respectively (Figure 3B) Figure 3. Mean Sweat Production and HDSS Improvement From Baselinea to Week 44/ET (Safety Populationb) Baseline (N=550) 164.7 Week 44/ET (N=430) 63.1 Mean CfB: -95.7 ± 140.8 None 5.9% 1 Grade 30.9% 2 Grades 46.7% 3 Grades 16.5% Improvement 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 -100 -50 0 M ea n S w ea t P ro du ct io n (m g/ 5 m in ) A. Sweat Productionc 100 80 60 40 20 0 P ro po rt io n of S ub je ct s (% ) B. HDSS Improvementd aBaseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 bPatients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post-Baseline assessment in ARIDO cGravimetrically-measured average from the left and right axillae dN=437 CfB, change from Baseline; ET, early termination; HDSS, Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale Safety Assessments • After 44 weeks, 329 (59.8%) patients reported ≥1 TEAE, though most were mild or moderate in severity (Table 2) • A total of 44 (8.0%) patients discontinued due to a TEAE and 7 (1.3%) reported ≥1 serious TEAE (Table 2) • Prespecified anticholinergic TEAEs of interest were reported in 78 (14.2%) patients; most were mild or moderate in severity and were able to be managed by dose interruption (Table 2) – 37 patients reported 45 vision blurred events; 40 (88.9%) were bilateral – 29 patients reported 37 mydriasis events; 31 (83.8%) were unilateral • Generally, TEAEs, including TEAEs prespecified as anticholinergic TEAEs of interest, did not increase over time with longer duration of exposure (Table 3) • 179 (32.5%) of patients reported LSRs, which were typically mild or moderate in severity (Figure 4) • There were no clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs Table 2. Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events From Baselinea to Week 45/ET (Safety Populationb) GT (N=550) Any TEAE, n (%) 329 (59.8) Any Serious TEAE, n (%) 7 ( 1.3)c Discontinuation due to a TEAE, n (%) 44 ( 8.0) Deaths, n (%) 0 Most frequently reported TEAEs (>5% patients), n (%) Dry mouth Vision blurred Application site pain Nasopharyngitis Mydriasis 93 (16.9) 37 ( 6.7) 35 ( 6.4) 32 ( 5.8) 29 ( 5.3) Prespecified anticholinergic TEAEs of interest, n (%) Vision blurred Mydriasis Urinary hesitation Nocturia Urine flow decreased Hypermetropia Pollakiuria Pupils unequal 78 (14.2) 37 ( 6.7)d 29 ( 5.3)e 23 ( 4.2) 2 ( 0.4) 2 ( 0.4) 1 ( 0.2) 1 ( 0.2) 1 ( 0.2) Any TEAEs (N=329) TEAEs by severity, n (%) Mild Moderate Severe 148 (45.0) 153 (46.5) 28 ( 8.5) Relation to study drug, n (%) Not related Related 131 (39.8) 198 (60.2) Numbers in table represent the number of patients reporting ≥1 TEAE, not number of events aTEAEs are those with an onset after first application of study drug in ARIDO bPatients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post-Baseline assessment in ARIDO cInfectious colitis, affective disorder, suicide attempt, mydriasis, chest pain, concussion, diverticulitis d37 patients reported 45 vision blurred events; 40 (88.9%) were bilateral e29 patients reported 37 mydriasis events; 31 (83.8%) were unilateral ET, early termination; GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event Table 3. Summary of Frequently Reported TEAEs and TEAEs of Special Interest (Safety Populationa) TEAEs, n (%) Duration of Exposure 0 to 4 weeks (N=550) >4 to 8 weeks (N=537) >8 to 20 weeks (N=479) >24 to 36 weeks (N=417) >36 weeks to ES (N=365) Any TEAE 176 (32.0) 148 (27.6) 102 (21.3) 78 (18.7) 59 (16.2) TEAEs reported in >5% of patients Dry mouth Vision blurred Application site pain Nasopharyngitis Mydriasis 59 (10.7) 11 ( 2.0) 16 ( 2.9) 14 ( 2.5) 8 ( 1.5) 23 ( 4.3) 14 ( 2.6) 9 ( 1.7) 9 ( 1.7) 8 ( 1.5) 19 ( 4.0) 7 ( 1.5) 5 ( 1.0) 4 ( 0.8) 9 ( 1.9) 15 ( 3.6) 5 ( 1.2) 6 ( 1.4) 5 ( 1.2) 5 ( 1.2) 5 ( 1.4) 4 ( 1.1) 3 ( 0.8) 3 ( 0.8) 2 ( 0.5) Prespecified anticholinergic TEAEs of interest Vision blurred Mydriasis Urinary hesitation Nocturia Urine flow decreased Hypermetropia Pollakiuria Pupils unequal 11 ( 2.0) 8 ( 1.5) 14 ( 2.5) 2 ( 0.4) 1 ( 0.2) 0 0 1 ( 0.2) 14 ( 2.6) 8 ( 1.5) 4 ( 0.7) 0 1 ( 0.2) 0 0 0 7 ( 1.5) 9 ( 1.9) 4 ( 0.8) 0 0 0 0 0 5 ( 1.2) 5 ( 1.2) 2 ( 0.5) 0 0 1 ( 0.2) 1 ( 0.2) 0 4 ( 1.1) 2 ( 0.5) 1 ( 0.3) 0 0 0 0 0 Numbers in table represent the number of patients reporting ≥1 TEAE, not number of events TEAEs are those with an onset after first application of study drug in ARIDO aPatients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post Baseline assessment on ARIDO ES, end of study; GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event Figure 4. Summary of Local Skin Reactions by Severity From Baselinea to Week 44/ET (Safety Populationb) Any (N=179) 44 (25%) 120 (67%) 15 (8%) Erythema (N=116) 27 (23%) 81 (70%) 8 (7%) Burning/Stinging (N=73) 24 (33%) 42 (58%) 7 (10%) Pruritus (N=68) 26 (38%) 31 (46%) 11 (16%) Dryness (N=48) 8 (17%) 39 (81%) 1 (2%) Edema (N=34) 8 (24%) 24 (71%) 2 (6%) Scaling (N=25) 5 (20%) 20 (80%) Mild Moderate Severe 200 160 120 80 40 0 N um be r of L S R s Patients were counted as having an LSR if any post-Baseline assessment was mild, moderate, or severe aBaseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 bPatients receiving ≥1 dose of GT and having ≥1 post-Baseline assessment in ARIDO ET, early termination; GT, topical glycopyrronium tosylate; LSR, local skin reaction CONCLUSIONS • Safety results were consistent with anticholinergic treatment and with the safety profile observed in prior GT studies,3 with no new or unexpected findings – Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity and considered by the Investigator to be related to study drug – A low number of subjects discontinued due to a TEAE – While approximately one-third of patients reported local skin reactions, most were mild or moderate in severity – Incidence of TEAEs, including prespecified anticholinergic TEAEs of interest, did not increase with long-term treatment • Efficacy measures obtained at the end of treatment in ARIDO indicated that subjects had maintained sweat production reduction and less bothersome sweating compared with Baseline in ATMOS-1/ATMOS-2 • GT was generally well tolerated and improvements in efficacy measures were maintained in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis when applied once daily to both axillae over a maximum of 48 weeks References 1. Doolittle et al. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016;308(10):743-9. 2. Hamm. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32(4):467-76. 3. Pariser et al. Poster presented at: 25th European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology Congress; September 28-October 2, 2016; Vienna, Austria. 4. Glaser et al. Poster presented at: 13th Maui Derm for Dermatologists Congress; March 20-24, 2017; Maui, HI. Acknowledgements This study was funded by Dermira, Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Prescott Medical Communications Group (Chicago, IL). All costs associated with development of this poster were funded by Dermira, Inc. Author Disclosures DAG: Consultant and investigator for Dermira, Inc. AAH: Consultant for Dermira, Inc.; employee of the University of Texas Medical School, Houston, which received compensation from Dermira, Inc. for study participation. AN: Employee of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, which received compensation from Dermira, Inc. for study participation. WPW: Consultant and investigator for Dermira, Inc. SS: Investigator for Dermira, Inc. LG: Consultant and investigator for Dermira, Inc.; investigator for Brickell. RDM: Consultant for Dermira, Inc. JD: Employee of Dermira, Inc. JQ: Employee of QST Consultations. DMP: Consultant and investigator for Dermira, Inc.