Open-Label Extension Study Evaluating the Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of FMX103 1.5% Topical Minocycline Foam in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Facial Papulopustular Rosacea Linda Stein Gold, MD1, James Q. Del Rosso, DO2, Leon Kircik, MD3, Neal D. Bhatia, MD4, Deirdre Hooper, MD5, Walter Nahm, MD, PhD6, Iain Stuart, PhD7 1Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; 2JDR Dermatology Research/Thomas Dermatology, Las Vegas, NV; 3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sanai, New York, NY; 4Therapeutics Clinical Research, San Diego, CA; 5Delricht Research, New Orleans, LA; 6University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; 7Menlo Therapeutics Inc., Bridgewater, NJ Introduction • Rosacea is a chronic, inflammatory disorder involving the face that is characterized by central facial erythema, flushing, telangiectasia, edema, papules, and pustules1-3 • Oral tetracyclines, such as doxycycline and minocycline, are among the common therapies that are used for treating the disorder with oral, sub-microbial doxycycline currently approved for this indication. However, these agents have been associated with antibiotic resistance, adverse side effects, such as gastrointestinal upset and permanent hyperpigmentation, and following treatment cessation, the tendency for disease relapse is high3-7 • The efficacy and safety of FMX103 1.5% topical minocycline foam in treating moderate-to-severe rosacea have previously been reported in two, 12-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, Phase 3 studies (Study 11 and Study 12)8 • Objective: To demonstrate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of topical FMX103 1.5% minocycline foam in moderate to severe facial papulopustular rosacea for up to 52 weeks. Methods • FX2016-13 (Study 13) was an open-label, multicenter, 40-week extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of FMX103 1.5% topical foam in the treatment of moderate-to-severe facial papulopustular rosacea (Figure 1) • Subjects were eligible to enter Study 13 upon successful completion of either double-blind study (Study 11 or Study 12) – There was no limit on the number of subjects who could enter the open-label phase • Concomitant use of prescription or OTC medications that the subjects were taking or any change in dosage was permitted and recorded • Investigator Global Assessments (IGAs) were based upon a 5-point scale with 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe Figure 1. Study design Week 52Baseline Key Inclusion Criteria for DB Study • Males and nonpregnant females ≥18 years • Moderate-to-severe facial papulopustular rosacea (IGA score of 3 or 4) • >15 to ≤75 facial papules and pustules, excluding lesions involving eyes and scalp; ≤2 nodules on the face • Presence or history of facial erythema or flushing Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoints • Absolute change in the inflammatory lesion count at Week 52 compared to DB baseline • IGA Success Rate (dichotomized as yes/no) at Week 52, where success was defined as an IGA score of 0 or 1, and at least a 2-grade improvement (decrease) from DB baseline Secondary Efficacy Endpoints • The absolute and percent change from DB baseline in inflammatory lesion count at Weeks 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, and 52 of the OL study • The dichotomized IGA Success Rate at Weeks 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, and 46 • The Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) at Week 52 Week 12 FMX103 1.5% (505 enrolled, 504 in safety population, 410 completed) Double-blind, vehicle-controlled (N=1522) Open-Label (FX2016-13) for subjects who completed the DB study Visit every 6 weeks Vehicle Foam (n=256) FMX103 1.5% (n=495) Vehicle Foam (n=257) FMX103 1.5% (n=514) S tu dy 1 1 S tu dy 1 2 IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment; DB, double-blind study; OL, open-label study; OTC, over-the-counter. Results Subject Disposition and Double-Blind Baseline Demographics • As shown in Figure 2, 504 subjects who completed the DB study (Study 11: N=217; Study 12: N=287) comprised the All Treated (Safety) population in the OL extension study (Study 13) Figure 2. Subject disposition 3 Discontinuation Adverse event = 5 Abnormal laboratory follow-up = 0 Lost to follow-up = 29 Subject request = 50 Protocol deviation = 0 Other = 9Completed OL study (N=410) FMX103/FMX103, n=276 (83%) Vehicle/FMX103, n=134 (78%) Study 11 Randomized (N=751) Completed DB study (FMX103 1.5%) n=437 Completed DB study (Vehicle) n=232 Entered OL study n=140 (32%) Entered OL study n=77 (24%) Study 12 Randomized (N=771) Completed DB study (FMX103 1.5%) n=479 Completed DB study (Vehicle) n=239 Entered OL study n=192 (40%) Entered OL study n=95 (40%) Study 13 Total entering OL study (N=505*) Total in safety population (N=504) FMX103/FMX103, n=332 (36%) Vehicle/FMX103, n=172 (37%) *One subject who was enrolled discontinued the same day prior to taking the study drug and was therefore excluded from the safety population. • Double-blind demographics, double-blind baseline characteristics, and concomitant use of medication during the OLE study are shown in Table 1 Table 1. Double-blind baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and concomitant use of medication Variable FMX103/ FMX103 (N=332) Vehicle Foam/ FMX103 (N=172) Overall (N=504) Mean age (SD) 18 to 40 years 41 to 64 years ≥ 65 years 51.1 (12.62) 68 (20.5) 214 (64.5) 50 (15.1) 51.9 (11.90) 26 (15.1) 121 (70.3) 25 (14.5) 51.4 (12.37) 94 (18.7) 335 (66.5) 75 (14.9) Gender, n (%) Male Female 91 (27.4) 241 (72.6) 62 (36.0) 110 (64.0) 153 (30.4) 351 (69.6) Race, n (%) White Black Other 321 (96.7) 5 (1.5) 6 (1.8) 163 (95.3) 3 (1.8) 6 (1.8) 484 (96.2) 8 (1.6) 12 (2.4) Mean inflammatory lesion count, n (SD) 28.8 (12.63) 28.7 (11.93) 28.8 (12.38) IGA score, n (%) 3 – Moderate 4 – Severe 301 (90.7) 31 (9.3) 149 (86.6) 23 (13.4) 450 (89.3) 54 (10.7) Any concomitant medication during the study, n (%) Vitamins Lipid modifying agents Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system Antibiotics and chemotherapeutics for dermatological use Antifungals for dermatological use Other dermatological preparations 273 (82.2) 81 (24.4) 76 (22.9) 72 (21.7) 6 (1.8) 6 (1.8) 9 (2.7) 137 (79.7) 39 (22.7) 38 (22.1) 35 (20.3) 4 (2.3) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.7) 410 (81.3) 120 (23.8) 114 (22.6) 107 (21.2) 10 (2.0) 7 (1.4) 12 (2.4) Baseline is defined as the Baseline visit in the double-blind study; IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment; SD, standard deviation. Safety and Tolerability • Summary of all adverse events in the all treated population is shown in Table 2 • The majority of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered mild or moderate in severity and no serious TEAEs were related to treatment Table 2. Summary of TEAEs, rates of discontinuation and overall FMX103 1.5% treatment duration in the OL extension Variable FMX103 1.5%/ FMX103 1.5% (N=332) Vehicle Foam/ FMX103 1.5% (N=172) Overall (N=504) Subjects with any AE, n (%) 151 (45.5) 70 (40.7) 221 (43.8) Subjects with any TEAE, n (%) 137 (41.3) 64 (37.2) 201 (39.9) Subjects with any serious TEAE, n (%) 9 (2.7)a 4 (2.3)b 13 (2.6) Subjects with treatment-related TEAEs, n (%) 5 (1.5)c 8 (4.7)d 13 (2.6) Subjects with serious treatment-related TEAEs, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Subjects discontinued due to AE, n (%) 3 (0.9)e 2 (1.2)f 5 (1.0) TEAEs resulting in death, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Subjects exposed to > 6 months (>168 days), n (%) 319 (96.1) 146 (84.9) 465 (92.3) Subjects exposed to > 1 year (>350 days), n (%) 272 (81.9) 0 (0.0) 272 (54.0) Number (%) of subjects with at least 1 AE per category; AE, adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event aLabyrinthitis, periorbital cellulitis, pneumonia, staphylococcal infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, cerebrovascular accident, syncope, subdural hematoma, death, hypokalemia, malignant melanoma bAppendicitis perforated, post procedural hemorrhage, large intestinal instruction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cMydriasis, angular cheilitis, herpes simplex, dermatitis contact, hair color changes dDiarrhea, conjunctivitis, sunburn, acne, dermatitis contact, erythema, pruritus, rosacea, skin lesion eDermatitis contact, mydriasis, enchondromatosis fRosacea, anemia, leukocytosis, appendicitis perforated, sepsis, appendicectomy • TEAEs occurring in at least 2% of open-label subjects from either arm of the double-blind phase are shown in Table 3 Table 3. TEAEs in the OL extension Variable FMX103 1.5%/ FMX103 1.5% (N=332) Vehicle Foam/ FMX103 1.5% (N=172) Overall (N=504) Subjects with one or more TEAE, n (%) 137 (41.3) 64 (37.2) 201 (39.9) Infections and infestations Upper respiratory tract infection Viral upper respiratory tract infection Sinusitis Influenza Bronchitis Urinary tract infection 14 (4.2) 14 (4.2) 8 (2.4) 9 (2.7) 8 (2.4) 8 (2.4) 5 (2.9) 5 (2.9) 9 (5.2) 5 (2.9) 2 (1.2) 1 (0.6) 19 (3.8) 19 (3.8) 17 (3.4) 14 (2.8) 10 (2.0) 9 (1.8) Nervous system disorders Headache 8 (2.4) 2 (1.2) 10 (2.0) Vascular disorders Hypertension 7 (2.1) 1 (0.6) 8 (1.6) TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event • Local facial assessments at Week 52 demonstrated that FMX103 1.5% topical minocycline foam was well tolerated during the OL extension study (Figure 3) Figure 3. Facial tolerability assessed at Week 52 0 14.2 3.8 0.2 45.1 29.0 29.4 66.3 10.7 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BL Wk 52 Erythema 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.70.5 0.4 Chart Title0=None 1=Mild 2=Moderate 3=Severe 6.0 19.0 64.7 97.0 17.1 57.6 45.2 80.3 53.6 86.3 62.1 90.0 62.1 79.1 57.5 66.3 23.4 3.0 42.3 36.9 38.3 18.2 35.3 13.2 30.6 9.0 30.6 20.2 36.5 14.7 11.9 36.9 5.0 16.5 10.7 7.3 7.3 3.8 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 BL Wk 52 % o f p op ul at io n Hyper- pigmentation Peeling/ Desquamation ItchingDryness/ Xerosis Flushing/ Blushing Burning/ Stinging Telangiectasia Clear Severe Moderate Mild Almost Clear 0.8 0.5 Note: Percentages exclude missing responses as 60 responses were missing from the FMX103/FMX103 group (N=272) and 43 responses were missing from the Vehicle/FMX103 group (N=129). BL refers to baseline of the double-blind study Hyperpigmentation was evaluated as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation Long-Term Efficacy • Treatment with FMX103 1.5% during the 40-week OL extension study was associated with reduction in inflammatory lesions relative to the DB and OL baselines, regardless of previous treatment during the DB studies (Figure 4) Figure 4. Absolute (A) and percent (B) change from DB baseline in inflammatory lesions -100 -75 -50 -25 0 0 4 8 12 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 % r ed uc tio n fr om D B b as el in e in in fla m m at or y le si on c ou nt -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 0 4 8 12 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 M ea n re du ct io n fr om D B b as el in e in in fla m m at or y le si on c ou nt DB study Vehicle group switched to active treatment FMX103 1.5%/FMX103 1.5% (N=332) BA -46.4% - 62.4% - 80.9% - 83.0% Vehicle/FMX103 1.5% (N=172) DB study Vehicle group switched to active treatment FMX103 1.5%/FMX103 1.5% (N=332) -12.8 - 17.9 Vehicle/FMX103 1.5% (N=172) -22.5 -23.0 Week Week DB, double-blind study; change from baseline is calculated as the value at baseline minus the post-baseline value • At the end of the study, 81.6% of the FMX103/FMX103 patients, and 76.0% of the vehicle/FMX103 patients, achieved IGA treatment success (Figure 5) Figure 5. IGA treatment success 0 19 37.8 47.6 50.6 60.1 68.1 69.1 72.4 73.5 81.6 0.0 12.2 32.6 39.0 48.2 54.5 64.0 64.4 65.9 72.1 76.0 0 25 50 75 100 0 4 8 12 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 % o f p op ul at io n w ith IG A t re at m en t s uc ce ss Week FMX103/FMX103 Vehicle/FMX103 Number of subjects remaining in the study Week 0 4 8 12 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 FMX103/ FMX103 332 332 331 332 326 321 310 298 286 279 272 Vehicle/ FMX103 172 172 172 172 168 156 150 146 138 136 129 DB study * DB, double-blind study; IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment *Week 12 of the DB study serves as the baseline for the OLE study Subject Satisfaction • At the end of the open-label study there was a high rate of subject satisfaction with FMX103 1.5% for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (Figure 6) Figure 6. Subject satisfaction questionnaire results at Week 52 All Treated Population, N=504 Compared to other products 55%28% 11% 5% 1% 59%24% 11% 5% 1% Overall satisfaction with product 59%24% 9% 7% 1% Recommend to friend Very satisfied Very dissatisfiedDissatisfied Somewhat satisfiedSatisfied Very likely Very unlikelyUnlikely Somewhat likelyLikely Percentages exclude 110 missing responses Summary Limitations • Because of the nature of the open-label study, no inference can be made on comparability due to the absence of a vehicle-treated control Conclusions • FMX103 1.5% appeared to be safe and well tolerated for the long-term treatment of papulopustular rosacea for up to 52 weeks of treatment • No minocycline-induced hyperpigmentation was observed • Throughout 52 weeks of treatment, FMX103 1.5% continued to be associated with a decreasing number of inflammatory lesions, as well as with improvement in overall disease severity, as assessed by IGA scores • Patient satisfaction levels were high, with >80% of all subjects being either satisfied or very satisfied with FMX103 1.5% Disclosures/Acknowledgment Disclosures Dr. Stein Gold is an advisor and investigator for Foamix, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and Valeant and is an investigator for Janssen, AbbVie, and Solgel and an advisor and investigator for Novartis. Dr. Del Rosso is a consultant for Aclaris, Almirall, Athenex, Cutanea, Dermira, Ferndale, Galderma, Genentech, LEO Pharma, Menlo, Novan, Ortho, Pfizer, Promius, Sanofi/Regeneron, SkinFix, and SunPharma; he has received research support from Aclaris, Almirall, Athenex, Botanix, Celgene, Cutanea, Dermira, Galderma, Genentech, LEO Pharma, Menlo, Novan, Ortho, Promius, Regeneron, SunPharma, and Thync; he receives honoraria from Aclaris, Celgene, Galderma, Genentech, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Promius, Sanofi/Regeneron, and SunPharma; and he participates in speakers bureaus for honoraria from Aclaris, Celgene, Galderma, Genentech, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Promius, Sanofi/Regeneron, and SunPharma. Dr. Bhatia is an investigator and consultant for Foamix Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Hooper served as an investigator for Foamix Pharmaceuticals; she reports personal fees from DelRicht Research during the conduct of the study; honoraria from Allergan, Almirall Aesthetics, Aqua Galderma USA, Cutera, Inc., Ferndale, La Roche Posay, Pixacore, RBC Consultants (clarisonic), Revance, and Viviscal; and other financial benefits from Actavis, Dermira, GSK, Mylan, and Sol Gel. Dr. Nahm is an investigator for Foamix Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Iain Stuart is an employee and stockholder at Menlo Therapeutics Inc. This study is funded by Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Menlo Therapeutics Inc. Acknowledgment Editorial support was provided by Scient Healthcare Communications. References 1. Li WQ, Cho E, Khalili H, et al. Rosacea, use of tetracycline, and risk of incident inflammatory bowel disease in women. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(2):220-225. 2. Taieb A, Stein Gold L, Feldman SR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ivermectin 1% cream in adults with papulopustular rosacea in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22(6):654-665. 3. Rainer BM, Kang S, Chien AL. Rosacea: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Dermatoendocrinol. 2017;9(1):e131574. 4. Goldgar C, Keahey DJ, Houchins J. Treatment options for acne rosacea. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(5):461-468. 5. Oge LK, Munchie HL, Phillips-Savoy AR. Rosacea: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(3):187-196. 6. Fiscus V, Hankinson A, Alweis R. Minocycline-induced hyperpigmentation. J Community Hosp. 2014;4:24063. 7. Valentín S, Morales A, Sánchez JL, Rivera A. Safety and efficacy of doxycycline in the treatment of rosacea. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2009;2:129-140. 8. Stein Gold L, Del Rosso JQ, Kircik L, et al. Minocycline 1.5% foam for the topical treatment of moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea: Results of Two Phase 3, Randomized, Clinical Trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. In press.