Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers Francesco Claps,1,2 M. Carmen Mir1 1 Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncología, Valencia, Spain 2 Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Hospital of Cattinara, Trieste, Italy Abstract Identification of reliable molecular biomarkers that can complement clinical practice represents a fascinating challenge in any cancer field. Renal tumors are usually asymptomatic and incidentally identified during imaging studies undertaken for unrelated causes. However, in 25% to 30% of patients the first diagnosis is accompanied by symptoms and associated with distant metastasis. Thus, early diagnosis may reduce the risk of disease progression also avoiding side effects of inadequate treatments. Moreover, the ability to categorize patients' risk of recurrence after radical treatment, or even predict benefit from a target therapy, represents a compelling challenge. Here we review the current state-of-the-art on RCC biomarkers, particularly focusing on the new approaches of genomics, liquid biopsy, proteomics, and metabolomics. Introduction Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common urological cancer in the United States, with an estimated 44 120 new cases in 2019[1]. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most frequent subtype, accounting for approximately 75% to 80% of these tumors, and is responsible for the majority of kidney cancer deaths[2]. In this narrative review we present the current state-of-the-art on diagnostic and prognostic RCC biomarkers, particularly focusing on the new approaches of genomics, liquid biopsy, proteomics, and metabolomics. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was performed using individual or/and different combinations of terms including “renal cell carcinoma,” “biomarker,” “diagnosis,” “prognosis,” and “survival.” Only papers with the title and abstract in the English language were screened for eligibility. The full text of included papers was analyzed. Biomarkers in Early Detection and Diagnosis Recent advances in diagnostic techniques have increased early ccRCC detection. Mortality rates, however, remain steady[3]. Imaging studies are still unable to differentiate histology, and renal mass biopsy has a 10% to 20% non- diagnostic rate[4]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to have novel and reliable biomarkers suitable for RCC screening and early detection, ensuring that the benefits of new technologies are fully realised (Table 1). Circulating cell-free DNA Liquid biopsy assays, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating cell-free DNA (cf DNA), constitute promising and less invasive techniques that can overcome the limits related to conventional diagnostic methods[5]. cfDNA consist mostly of double-stranded molecules that circulate as nucleoprotein complexes[6]. Hauser et al. evaluated cfDNA from patients with RCC and from healthy individuals using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Two primer sets amplifying a sequence of the actin-beta gene (ACTB) were used: ACTB-106 detects fragmented cf DNA that results from apoptosis, and ACTB-384 detects long DNA fragments released by necrosis. In this analysis, DNA fragments were significantly increased in RCC patients compared to healthy controls[7]. Lu et al. evaluated cfDNA extracted from plasma of healthy controls and 229 ccRCC patients at stages M0 and M1. The 306 base pairs fragment was lower in RCC patients than in controls. Since cfDNA fragment sizes are indicators of the integrity of cfDNA molecules, the authors showed that the ratio of longer to shorter cfDNA Key Words Competing Interests Article Information Renal cell carcinoma, biomarker, diagnosis, prognosis, survival None declared. Received on July 16, 2020 Accepted on September 8, 2020 Soc Int Urol J. 2021;2(1):32–42 32 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION mailto:mirmare%40yahoo.es?subject=SIUJ http://www.siuj.org fragments was significantly improved in patients staged as M0 compared with those as M1 subgroup[8]. On plasma cf DNA, Yamamoto et al. showed that median levels of cf DNA and median size of fragments from RCC patients were significantly greater than those from controls. An optimal cut-off value of 2876 copies/mL was identified[9]. Nuzzo et al. performed cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cf MeDIP-seq). cf MeDIP-seq is an enrichment- based method to comprehensively interrogate cf DNA methylation profile extracted from plasma and urine. The authors identified differentially methylated regions and selected the top rated between case and control samples. Samples from RCC patients were assigned a higher median methylation score than those from controls. Furthermore, the lowest methylation scores in RCC patients came from patients with small tumors. Thus the authors reported an accurate classification of patients across all stages of RCC in plasma cfDNA (AUC 0.99) and demonstrated the validity of this assay using urine cfDNA (AUC 0.86)[10]. The abundance and relative fragmentation of cfDNA in blood can be a universal marker for RCC7 yet the precise cfDNA metrics that are most clinically relevant remain controversial. Study results reported to date are limited by heterogeneity with respect to clinical stage, tumor pathology, blood sample processing, and methods of cfDNA analysis. Circulating tumor cells CTCs are cells that have been shed into the vasculature or lymphatics from a primary tumor. The detection and analysis of CTCs can assist in determining patient prognosis and personalized treatments, as well as initial diagnostic and monitoring procedures. Moreover, CTCs are particularly suited to interrogate functional heterogeneity by combining genetic and transcriptomic assessment of single CTC[11] or by transcriptome and epigenome analysis[12]. It is difficult to assess the diagnostic value of CTCs in RCC due to the use of different methods of CTC collection and identification across studies[13]. The different techniques include epithelial or non-epithelial marker-dependent isolation, reverse transcription PCR- based methods, and morphological- and cell size-based methods[14]. Moreover, RCC cancer cells are inclined to the loss of their epithelial antigens through epithelial- to-mesenchymal transition, in which morphological transformation leads to acquisition of mesenchymal features[15]. Other surface markers have been developed to select RCC cancer cells in the blood (eg, CAIX). Adding this new set of cell surface markers including CAIX and CD147 to the conventional detection of CTCs through epithelial markers, such as the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), has shown better results[16]. The role of microRNAs MicroRNAs (miRs) are implicated in the regulation of processes such as proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis, and are readily detectable in tissues and bodily fluids[17]. Wulfken et al. reported that the level of miR-1233 was significantly increased in patients with RCC compared with healthy controls. Thus, miR-1233 levels were investigated in an independent cohort confirming a higher mean value in RCC patients[18]. Zhao et al. found that miR-210 levels were higher in primary RCC tissues than in normal tissue. Furthermore, the serum level of miR-210 was significantly decreased in patients 7 days after nephrectomy; consequently, a potential combined role in early detection and monitoring after radical treatment could be proposed[19]. Iwamoto et al. confirmed at the serum level that the expression of miR-210 was significantly higher in RCC patients than in healthy controls[20]. In addition, a meta-analysis conducted by Chen et al. that included 7 studies, 570 RCC patients, and 415 healthy controls showed pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic OR to predict RCC of 74%, 76%, and 8.81, respectively[21]. Chen et al. evaluated the expression levels of miR- 129-3p and miR-129-5p in 69 cases of paired renal tumors, healthy tissues, and conventional RCC cell lines. MiR-129-3p and miR-129-5p are 2 mature products of miR-129-2 known for its anti-tumor effects in various malignancies. They showed that miR-129-3p, but not miR-129-5p, was widely attenuated in human ccRCC, and chRCC, yielding a 73.5% accuracy in discriminating ccRCC from normal tissues. The relative miR-129-3p expression significantly differed between malignant and benign kidney tumors[22]. In a prospective cohort, Yadav et al. found that use of serum miR-34a, miR-141, and miR-1233 was able Abbreviations ACTB actin-beta gene ccRCC clear-cell renal cell carcinoma CSS cancer-specific survival CTCs circulating tumor cells cfDNA circulating cell-free DNA miRs microRNAs OS overall survival PCR polymerase chain reaction PFS progression-free survival RCC renal cell carcinoma 33SIUJ.ORG SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers to diagnose ccRCC with a sensitivity of 80.76%, 75%, and 93.33%, and specificity of 80%, 73.33%, and 100%, respectively, when tumor pathologic was used as the reference. Moreover, a combined approach using a panel of 2 serum miRs (miR-141 and miR-1233), allowed a diagnosis of ccRCC with 100% sensitivity and 73.3% specificity[23]. Recently, Zhang et al. investigated whether miRNAs in serum exosomes can serve as biomarkers in ccRCC. Their findings showed that the expression levels of exosomal miR-210 and miR-1233 were significantly higher in RCC patients than in healthy individuals (both P < 0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated that exosomal expression levels distinguished RCC patients from healthy individuals with 70% sensitivity and 62.2% specificity for miR-210, and 81% sensitivity and 76% specificity for miR-1233[24]. Metabolites as novel biomarkers of RCC Metabolomic approaches have shown promising results in oncology, with the recognition of metabolic reprogramming as a hallmark of cancer. Globally, RCC metabolic signature of the tumor microenvironment is characterized by alterations in metabolites associated with energy metabolism, especially those involved in glycolysis, amino acid metabolism, and fatty acid catabolism pathways, which are essential for cell growth and proliferation[25]. Kim et al. first evaluated the utility of urine meta- bolomics analysis for metabolomic profiling. The authors identified a total of 212 molecules able to differentiate RCC presence. The rate of correct classification was 88%[26]. Ganti et al. showed differential urinary concentrations of several acylcarnitines as a surrogate of RCC status and grade, with most acylcarnitines being increased in RCC patients’ urine. Furthermore, urinary acylcarnitines were increased in a grade-dependent fashion in RCC patients and likely emanated from the tumor tissues. Acylcarnitines have both cytotoxicity and immune modulatory properties and thus may play a role in decreasing the inf lammatory response and providing a mechanism by which these cells are able to evade immune surveillance[27]. In the same field, Niziol et al. showed that hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, decanoylcarnitine, propanoylcarnitine, carnitine, dodecanoylcarnitine, and norepinephrine sulfate were found in much higher concentrations in both RCC tissues (compared with the paired normal tissue) and urine of cancer patients (compared with urine of control subjects)[28]. Proteomics analysis Proteomics offers a useful platform to study the complex molecular events of tumorigenesis. Upregulation in the glycolytic f lux is a common pathway in cancer. Therefore, using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) White et al. identified 55 proteins significantly dysregulated in RCC. Dysregulation of alpha-enolase (ENO1), L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain (LDHA), heatshock protein beta-1, known as Hsp27, mitochondrial (HSPE1) was confirmed in 2 independent sets of patients by western blot and immu nohistochemist r y (IHC). The ex pressions of AHNAK, ENO1, and Hsp27 were found to be significantly elevated in ccRCC compared with matched normal tissues. Whereas HSPE1 was significantly downregulated in RCC patients[29]. Zhang et al. recently found 16 significantly upregulated and 14 significantly downregulated in early-stage RCC compared with healthy controls. Serum heat shock cognate 71 (HSC71) was highly elevated in the RCC group compared with control group[30]. Kim et al. showed that RCC upregulated proteins were nicotinamide-N-methyl- transferase (NNMT), secretagogin (SCGN), L-plastin, human neuron specific enolase (hNSE), nonmetastatic cell 1 (NM23A), ferritin light chain (FTL), and thioredoxin peroxidase (KIM2010). NNMT was the most commonly upregulated protein over all types of RCC, especially in comparison with normal tissues. SCGN was elevated in ccRCC samples but not in papillary, chromophobe, or normal tissue, while NM23A showed the same behavior, although the magnitude of changes was smaller than in the first 2 molecules[31]. Prognostic Biomarkers Although most biomarkers for early detection and diagnosis remain at an early stage, more advances have been made with prognostic biomarkers for RCC. To date, few biomarkers have been taken beyond single studies, thus none are yet ready for routine clinical practice. Furthermore, emerging and promising approaches can serve as new platform in which novel potential biomarkers can be found. Following any type of surgical treatment of RCC, there is a need for risk stratification aiming to enable personalized outcome prediction. The major endpoints evaluated and predicted using prognostic biomarkers across the studies referred to in the following sections of this paper are disease/ progression/recurrence-free survival (D/P/RFS), overall and cancer-specific survival (OS, CSS), and correlations with clinicopathological features that might influence the prognosis among these patients[32] (Table 2). cfDNA One of the most promising uses of liquid biopsy is to determine the risk of recurrence after curative treatment. Wan et al. measured plasma levels of cfDNA before and after surgery for localized disease. Mean preoperative level of plasma cf DNA in patients who developed recurrent disease was significantly higher than in those 34 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION http://SIUJ.org with localized disease or controls[33]. Analyzing the genomic and mitochondrial cf DNA concentrations, Lu et a l. developed 2 models that incorporated clinicopathological features to specific expression patterns among cf DNA fragments. Particularly, APP gene, the Alu sequences, and the mitochondrial DNA fragments showing significant correlation in terms of OS and RFS[8]. In terms of quantitative measurement, TABLE 1. Novel potential candidates biomarkers in diagnosis and early detection of renal cell carcinoma Biomarker Source Trend Correlation/Use Reference cfDNA plasma serum increased  RCC and mRCC detection, association with histotype, monitoring after curative surgery Hauser et al. (2010)[7] de Martino et al. (2012)[51] Lu et al. (2016)[8] Yamamoto et al. (2018)[9] Nuzzo et al. (2020)[10] CTCs blood increased  RCC detection and monitoring Allard et al. (2004)[52] Li et al. (2005)[53] Liu et al. (2016)[16] Broncy et al. (2018)[54] miRNA miR-1233 serum increased  RCC detection Wulfken et al. (2011)[18] Zhang et al (2018)[24] Yadav et al. (2017)[23] miR-451 serum decreased  RCC detection Redova et al. (2012)[55] miR-378 serum increased  RCC detection Redova et al. (2012)[55] miR-21 tissue increased  RCC detection, differential diagnosis between ccRCC, pRCC and chRCC and oncocytoma Faragalla et al. (2012)[56] miR-15a tissue urine both increased  RCC detection, differential diagnosis between malignant and benign renal tumors von Brandestain et al. (2012)[57] miR-210 tissue urine serum increased  increased  increased  RCC detection and disease monitoring after local treatment Zhao et al. (2013)[19] Iwamoto et al. (2014)[20] Zhang et al. (2018)[24] Chen et al. (2018)[21] miR-129-3p tissue decreased  RCC detection, differential diagnosis between malignant and benign renal tumors Chen et al. (2014)[22] miR-34a serum decreased  RCC detection Yadav et al. (2017)[23] miR-141 serum decreased  RCC detection Yadav et al. (2017)[23] Abbreviations: cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ccRCC, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma; chRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; CTCs, circulating tumor cells; ENO1, alpha-enolase; FINC, fibronectin-1; HSC71, heat shock cognate 71; HSPE1, heat shock protein family E member 1; miRNA, microRNA; mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; NNMT, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; pRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; S100A8, S100 calcium-binding protein A8; S100A9, S100 calcium-binding protein A9; Tu M2-PK, tumor M2-PK. continued on page 36 35SIUJ.ORG SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers Yamamoto et al. divided their cohort into 2 subgroups according to the length of cf DNA fragments. Their resu lts showed t hat cf DNA f ragment size was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Although cf DNA fragmentation correlated with poorer outcomes, cf DNA plasma levels were not associated with any of survival outcomes[9]. Evaluating plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a subset of cfDNA, Bacon et al. reported that only 33% of patients had detectable ctDNA. Among ctDNA-positive patients the most commonly mutated genes were VHL, BAP1, and PBRM1. Moreover, ctDNA-positive patients had shorter OS and PFS on first-line therapy[34]. CTCs identification An initial experience using a RT-PCR assay to detect CTCs in peripheral blood of patients at different stages of RCC reported a different rate of positivity on localized and metastatic RCC (mRCC)[35]. Developing a new set of cell surface markers including CAIX and CD147, Liu et al. showed a significant association of CTC number/ CTC expression status of vimentin, with disease progression[16]. Wang et al. investigated the relationship of dynamic changes of CTCs and Beclin-1 expression of CTCs and RCC prognosis. CTCs were divided into epithelial, mesenchymal, and mixed phenotype-based surface biomarkers. For the metastatic group, the number of mixed CTCs at 12 months was significantly higher than mixed preoperatively and 6 months CTCs. Of note, the number of preoperative Beclin-1 positive CTCs was significantly higher in the metastatic group. Thus, variation trend of CTCs and Beclin-1 expressive CTCs was significantly associated with the onset of metastatic disease[36]. Moreover, in a prospective cohort of 60 patients who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent, Haga et al. evaluated CTCs drawn from a peripheral artery collected just before and immediately after surgery. The authors showed that open TABLE 1. Novel potential candidates biomarkers in diagnosis and early detection of renal cell carcinoma Biomarker Source Trend Correlation/Use Reference Metabolomics and Proteomics Acetylcarnitines urine tissue increased  RCC detection, grade-dependent behavior Ganti et al. (2012)[27] Niziol et al. (2018)[28] Tu M2-PK plasma increased  RCC and mRCC detection Roigas et al. (2001)[58] Weinberger et al. (2007)[59] AHNAK tissue increased  RCC detection White et al. (2014)[29] ENO1 tissue increased  RCC detection White et al. (2014)[29] HSPE1 tissue decreased  RCC detection White et al. (2014)[29] NNMT tissue increased  RCC detection Kim et al. (2010)[31] HSC71 serum increased  RCC detection Zhang Y et al. (2015)[30] S100A8 serum increased  RCC detection Zhang L et al. (2015)[60] Zhang L et al. (2016)[61] S100A9 serum increased  RCC detection Zhang L et al. (2015)[60] Zhang L et al. (2016)[61] FINC plasma increased  RCC detection Yokomizo et al. (2011)[62] Abbreviations: cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ccRCC, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma; chRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; CTCs, circulating tumor cells; ENO1, alpha-enolase; FINC, fibronectin-1; HSC71, heat shock cognate 71; HSPE1, heat shock protein family E member 1; miRNA, microRNA; mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; NNMT, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; pRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; S100A8, S100 calcium-binding protein A8; S100A9, S100 calcium-binding protein A9; Tu M2-PK, tumor M2-PK. , Cont’d 36 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION http://SIUJ.org TABLE 2. Novel potential candidate biomarkers in prognosis of renal cell carcinoma Biomarker Source Outcomes correlated Reference CTCs peripheral blood RFS, OS Bluemke et al. (2009) [63] Liu et al. (2016) [16] Wang et al. (2019) [36] Beclin-1-positive CTCs peripheral blood RFS Wang et al. (2019) [36] cfDNA plasma RFS, OS de Martino et al. (2011) [51] Wan et al. (2013) [33] Lu et al. (2016) [8] Yamamoto et al. (2018) [9] Bacon et al. (2020) [34] miRNA miR-378 serum DFS, clinical stage Fedorko et al. (2015) [64] miR-221 serum OS, CSM, lymphovascular invasion Teixeira et al. (2014) [65] Vergo et al. (2014) [66] miR-150 serum DSS, clinical stage Chanudet et al. (2017) [67] miR-451 serum clinical stage Redova et al. (2012) [68] miR-21 tumor tissue CSS, OS, DFS, clinical stage, tumor grade, tumor size Faragalla et al. (2012) [56] Tang et al. (2015) [38] Vergho et al. (2014) [69] Vergho et al. (2014) [66] miR-126 tumor tissue DFS, CSS, OS Vergho et al. (2014) [69] Vergho et al. (2014) [66] Khella et al. (2015) [70] miR-106b tumor tissue PFS Slaby et al. (2010) [71] miR-27a-3p tumor tissue PFS Nakata et al. (2015) [72] miR-210 tumor tissue CSS Tang et al. (2015) [38] miR-141 tumor tissue CSS Tang et al. (2015) [38] miR-200c tumor tissue CSS Tang et al. (2015) [38] miR-429 tumor tissue CSS Tang et al. (2015) [38] miR-486 tumor tissue CSM, clinical stage Goto et al. (2013) [73] miR-23b tumor tissue OS Ishihara et al. (2014)[74] Abbreviations: cfDNA, cell-free DNA; CSM, cancer-specific mortality; CSS, cancer-specific survival; CTCs, circulating tumor cells; DFS, disease-free survival; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PKM2, pyruvate kinase-muscle-2; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RFS, recurrence-free survival; S100A8, S100 calcium-binding protein A8; TK1, thymidine kinase 1; Tu M2-PK, tumor M2-P continued on page 38 37SIUJ.ORG SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers nephrectomy resulted in a significantly greater number of postoperative CTCs. At multivariate level that the surgical approach was significantly correlated with the number of postoperative CTCs (P = 0.016) and the perioperative change in CTCs (P = 0.01). Thus, especially after open surgery more cancer cells can be expelled into the bloodstream, suggesting a careful follow-up for these patients[37]. miRNA In a comprehensive meta-analysis of 29 published studies reporting miRNA signatures in RCC, Tang et al. identified a robust meta-signature of miRNAs as a prognostic biomarker. They reported that high expression of miR-21, miR-210, and low expression of miR-141, miR-200c, and miR-429 were associated with worse CSS following RCC resection[38]. Similarly, TABLE 2. Novel potential candidate biomarkers in prognosis of renal cell carcinoma Biomarker Source Outcomes correlated Reference miR-27b tumor tissue OS Ishihara et al. (2014)[74] lnc-ZNF180-2 tumor tissue PFS, CSS, OS, clinical stage Ellinger et al. (2015)[40] lnc-NBAT-1 tumor tissue OS Xue et al. (2015) [75] Metabolomics Creatine tumor tissue Advanced Tumor Stages (T3-4) Gato et al. (2012) [42] Glutamate tumor tissue Advanced Tumor Stages (T3-4) Gato et al. (2012) [42] Glutamine tumor tissue Advanced Tumor Stages (T3-4) Gato et al. (2012) [42] GAPDH tumor tissue High Grade Wettersten et al. (2015) [43] Enolase-2 tumor tissue High Grade Wettersten et al. (2015) [43] PKM2 tumor tissue High Grade Wettersten et al. (2015) [43] L-Lactate tumor tissue High Grade Wettersten et al. (2015) [43] Glutathione tumor tissue Advanced Stages Hakimi et al. (2016) [44] TuM2-PK serum RFS Nisman et al. (2010) [76] Gayed et al. (2015) [77] TK1 serum RFS Nisman et al. (2010) [76] cathepsin D urine OS Vasudev et al. (2009) [78] S100A8 tissue DFS, tumor grade, stage An et al. (2019) [79] Abbreviations: cfDNA, cell-free DNA; CSM, cancer-specific mortality; CSS, cancer-specific survival; CTCs, circulating tumor cells; DFS, disease-free survival; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PKM2, pyruvate kinase-muscle-2; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RFS, recurrence-free survival; S100A8, S100 calcium-binding protein A8; TK1, thymidine kinase 1; Tu M2-PK, tumor M2-P , Cont’d 38 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION http://SIUJ.org Gu et al. conducted a meta-analysis of 27 published studies and found that elevated expression of miR-21, miR-1260b, miR-210, miR-100, miR-125b, miR-221, miR- 630, and miR-497 was associated with a poor prognosis in RCC patients. Conversely, decreased expression of miR-106b, miR-99a, miR-1826, miR-215, miR-217, miR- 187, miR-129–3p, miR-23b, miR-27b, and miR-126 was associated with a worse prognosis. Importantly, the results from this meta-analysis confirmed that elevated miR-21 expression was associated with shorter OS, CSS, and DFS. The decreased expression of miR-126 was associated with shorter CSS, OS, and DFS[39]. Also, results were promising in a study by Ellinger et al. regarding specific circulating long non-coding (lnc) RNAs, defined as RNA transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides that are not transcribed into a protein. The authors next validated the expression profile of 6 lncRNAs transcripts (lnc-ACO1625, lnc-CYP4A22-2/3, lnc-PEAK1.1-1, lnc-PCYOX1L , lnc-VCAN-1, lnc- ZNF180-2) with potential prognostic interest. A significant increase of lnc-ZNF180-2 expression in advanced RCC tissue compared with localized RCC was observed. Furthermore, lnc-ZNF180-2 expression levels were an independent predictor of PFS, CSS, and OS[40]. Qu et al. built a model named RCClnc4 based on 4 lncRNAs to improve postoperative risk stratification after radical treatment. Stratifying patients into high- risk versus low-risk groups in terms of clinical outcomes, RCClnc4 remained as an independent prognostic factor, achieving a higher accuracy than clinical staging systems like TNM and SSIGN score[41]. Prognostic value of metabolomic approaches Analyzing tumors and their matched tissue, Gao et al. studied the metabolomic RCC profile. Creatine, glutamate, and glutamine were found at higher concentrations in tissues of tumors at T3-4 stages[42]. The glycolysis-relevant metabolites are significantly increased in high-grade disease, suggesting that glucose metabolism is more prominent with increasing tumor grade. Consequently, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, enolase 2, and py ruvate k inase- muscle-2 are increased in tumor tissue as compared with normal tissues. L-lactate follows the same tendency in a grade-dependent manner. Also levels of carnitine and acyl/acetyl-carnitines were associated with grade, suggesting how the combination of these metabolites can predict the biological aggressiveness of RCC and thus influence its prognosis[43]. A study by Hakemi et al. showed increased levels of glutathione were also grade- and stage-dependent[44]. Thus, the upregulation of antioxidant capacity in adaptation to intrinsic oxidative stress is indeed a common event in RCC, especially in the advanced stages[45]. Epigenetic and DNA methylation biomarkers Epigenetic variations play an important role in renal carcinogenesis and progression. DNA methylation is defined as a covalent addition of a methyl group to cytosines that precede a guanosine which are mainly clustered as CpG islands in the promoter region of genes bringing a functional silencing[46]. Furthermore, DNA methylation alterations are often shown to be associated with clinicopathological features and RCC patient survival or both[47]. CpG island methylation markers ref lect tumor biology, allowing the identification of patients with “high epigenetic risk” who can benefit from tailored management to improve sur v iva l outcomes. In a recent systematic review, Joosten et al. described 9 genes (SFRP1, BNC1, GREM1, RASSF1A, PCDH8, SCUBE3, GATA5, LAD1, and NEFH), associated with patient survival. Their prognostic value was indepen dently validated in other studies[48]. To develop a 5-CpG- based assay for ccRCC prognosis, a panel composed by methylation of PITX1, FOXE3, TWF2, RIN1, and EHBP1L, was validated in 3 independent sets from China, the United States, and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Stratifying patients into 2 groups from this 5-CpG panel, Wei et al. defined low- and high- risk categories. An important correlation between the high-risk group and poorer OS[49] was demonstrated. With the same endpoint, Chen et al. identified 7 specific prognosis-subgroups based on the DNA methylation spectrum of RCC from the TCGA database. The specific DNA methylation patterns ref lected differentially in the clinical index, including TNM classification, pathological grade, clinical stage, and age. In addition, 437 CpGs corresponding to 477 genes of 151 samples were identified as specific hyper/hypomethylation sites for each specific subgroup. The authors then constructed a Bayesian classifier to determine the function of the prognosis prediction model, with 437 specific CpG sites as characters (AUC 0.95)[50]. Conclusions Ca ncer biomarkers have shif ted treat ment a nd management of patients with many cancer types. A lt hough “persona lized ” medicine is becoming more common in our daily practice, none of the RCC biomarkers discussed are in routine clinical use. Metabolomics and proteomics studies have shown excellent potential in terms of diagnostic accuracy, but research in these areas still appears to be hypothesis- generating. Most of publications mentioned above aimed to understand tumor biology due to the high heterogenicity of RCC. 39SIUJ.ORG SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers Circulating biomarkers have attracted a lot of interest; however, the great diversity of techniques precludes any further conclusions. The growing use of liquid biopsy, popularized by the easy accessibility of samples, and the accompanying standardization of methods of analysis and quantification of CTCs, cfDNA and miRNAs will continue to provide promising results. Particularly, NGS cfDNA is a novel technology that can complement tumor tissue biopsy. It has demonstrated its potential role across the diagnostic and prognostic fields of both localized and metastatic RCC. Single molecule validations are being replaced by multipanel biomarkers to provide improved validation results. It also reflects the role of molecular biology in current clinical nomograms as a transition tool from bench to bedside. References 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69:7–34. 2. Capitanio U, Cloutier V, Zini L, Isbarn H, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, et al. A critical assessment of the prognostic value of clear cell, papillary and chromophobe histological subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: A population-based study. BJU Int. 2009; 103:1496–500. 3. Battaglia M, Lucarelli G. The role of renal surger y in the era of targeted therapy: The urologist’s perspective. Urologia. 2015; 82:137–8. 4. Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB, Hofmann F, Stewart F, Norrie J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016; 69:660–73. 5. García-Casas A, García-Olmo DC, García-Olmo D. Further the liquid biopsy: Gathering pieces of the puzzle of genometastasis theory. World J Clin Oncol. 2017; 8:378–88. 6. Fleischhacker M, Schmidt B. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer-A sur vey. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2007; 1775:181–232. 7. Hauser S, Zahalka T, Ellinger J, Fechner G, Heukamp LC, Von Ruecker A, et al. Cell-free circulating DNA: Diagnostic value in patients with renal cell cancer. Anticancer Res. 2010; 30:2785–9. 8. Lu H, Busch J, Jung M, Rabenhorst S, Ralla B, Kilic E, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic potential of circulating cell-free genomic and mitochondrial DNA fragments in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2016; 452:109–19. 9. Yamamoto Y, Uemura M, Nakano K, Hayashi Y, Wang C, Ishizuya Y, et al. Increased level and fragmentation of plasma circulating cell-free DNA are diagnostic and prognostic markers for renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018; 9:20467–75. 10. Nuzzo PV, Berchuck JE, Korthauer K, Spisak S, Nassar AH, Abou Alaiwi S, et al. Detection of renal cell carcinoma using plasma and urine cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat Med. 2020; 26:1041–3. 11. Klein CA, Seidl S, Petat-Dutter K, Offner S, Geigl JB, Schmidt-Kitler O, et al. Combined transcriptome and genome analysis of single micrometastatic cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20:387–92. 12. Zhao C, Hu S, Huo X, Zhang Y. Dr.seq2: A quality control and analysis pipeline for parallel single cell transcriptome and epigenome data. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0180583. 13. Cimadamore A, Massari F, Santoni M, Mollica V, Di Nunno V, Cheng L, et al. Molecular characterization and diagnostic criteria of renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on liquid biopsies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019; 00:1–10. 14. van der Toom EE, Verdone JE, Gorin MA, Pienta KJ. Technical challenges in the isolation and analysis of circulating tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:62754–66. 15. Piva F, Giulietti M, Santoni M, Occhipinti G, Scarpelli M, Lopez- Beltran A, et al. Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Cancer Therapy. Mol Diagn Ther. 2016; 20:111–7. 16. Liu S, Tian Z, Zhang L, Hou S, Hu S, Wu J, et al. Combined cell surface carbonic anhydrase 9 and CD147 antigens enable high- efficiency capture of circulating tumor cells in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:59877–91. 17. Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12: 861–74. 18. Wulfken LM, Moritz R, Ohlmann C, Holdenrieder S, Jung V, Becker F, et al. MicroRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: Diagnostic implications of serum miR-1233 levels. PLoS One. 2011; 6. DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0025787. 19. Zhao A, Li G, Péoc’h M, Genin C, Gigante M. Serum miR-210 as a novel biomarker for molecular diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013; 94:115–20. 20. Iwamoto H, Kanda Y, Sejima T, Osaki M, Okada F, Takenaka A. Serum miR-210 as a potential biomarker of early clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2014; 44:53–8. 21. Chen Y, Wang X, Zhu X, Shao S. Detection per formance of circulating MicroRNA-210 for renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Clin Lab. 2018; 64:569–76. 22. Chen X, Ruan A, Wang X, Han W, Wang R, Lou N, et al. miR-129-3p, as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for renal cell carcinoma, at tenuates cell migration and invasion via dow nregulating multiple metastasis-related genes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014; 140:1295–304. 23. Yadav S, Khandelwal M, Seth A, Saini AK, Dogra PN, Sharma A. Serum microRNA expression profiling: potential diagnostic implications of a panel of serum microRNAs for clear cell renal cell cancer. Urology. 2017; 104:64–9. 24. Zhang W, Ni M, Su Y, Wang H, Zhu S, Zhao A, et al. MicroRNAs in serum exosomes as potential biomarkers in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2018; 4:412–9. 25. Catchpole G, Platzer A, Weikert C, Kempkensteffen C, Johannsen M, Krause H, et al. Metabolic profiling reveals key metabolic features of renal cell carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2011; 15:109–18. 40 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION http://SIUJ.org 26. Kim K, Aronov P, Zakharkin SO, Anderson D, Perroud B, Thompson IM, et al. Urine metabolomics analysis for kidney cancer detection and biomarker discovery. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8:558–70. 27. Ganti S, Taylor SL, Kim K, Hoppel CL, Guo L, Yang J, et al. Urinary acylcarnitines are altered in human kidney cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012; 130:2791–800. 28. Nizioł J, Bonifay V, Ossoliñski K, Ossoliñski T, Ossoliñski A, Sunner J, et al. Metabolomic study of human tissue and urine in clear cell renal carcinoma by LC-HRMS and PLS-DA. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; 410:3859–69. 29. White NMA, Masui O, DeSouza LV, Krakovska-Yutz O, Metias S, Romaschin AD, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential diagnostic markers and pathways involved in pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014; 5:506–18. 30. Zhang Y, Cai Y, Yu H, Li H. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis identified HSC71 as a novel serum biomarker for renal cell carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:802153. 31. Kim DS, Choi YP, Kang S, Gao MQ, Kim B, Park HR, et al. Panel of candidate biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9:3710–9. 32. Golovastova MO, Korolev DO, Tsoy LV, Varshavasky VA, Xu W-H, Vinarov A Z, et al. Biomarkers of renal tumors: The current state and clinical perspectives. Curr Urol Rep. 2017; 18. DOI:10.1007/ s11934-017-0655-1. 33. Wan J, Zhu L, Jiang Z, Cheng K. Monitoring of plasma cell-free DNA in predicting postoperative recurrence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urol Int. 2013; 91:273–8. 34. Bacon JV W, Annala M, Soleimani M, Lavoie J-M, So A, Gleave ME, et al. Plasma circulating tumor DNA and clonal hematopoiesis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020; 18:322-331.e2. 35. McKiernan JM, Buttyan R, Bander NH, de la Taille A, Stifelman MD, Emanuel ER, et al. The detection of renal carcinoma cells in the peripheral blood with an enhanced reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction assay for MN/CA9. Cancer. 1999; 86:492–7. 36. Wang Z-L, Zhang P, Li H-C, Yang X-J, Zhang Y-P, Li Z-L, et al. Dynamic changes of different phenotypic and genetic circulating tumor cells as a biomarker for evaluating the prognosis of RCC. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019; 20:505–12. 37. Haga N, Onagi A, Koguchi T, Hoshi S, Ogawa S, Akaihata H, et al. Perioperative detection of circulating tumor cells in radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27:1272–81. 38. Tang K, Xu H. Prognostic value of meta-signature miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: An integrated miRNA expression profiling analysis. Sci Rep. 2015; 5. DOI:10.1038/srep10272. 39. Gu L, Li H, Chen L, Ma X, Gao Y, Li X, et al. MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:32545–60. 40. Ellinger J, Alam J, Rothenburg J, Deng M, Schmidt D, Syring I, et al. The long non-coding RNA lnc-ZNF180-2 is a prognostic biomarker in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2015; 5:2799–807. 41. Qu L, Wang Z-L, Chen Q, Li Y-M, He H-W, Hsieh JJ, et al. Prognostic value of a long non-coding RNA signature in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2018; 74:756–63. 42. Gao H, Dong B, Jia J, Zhu H, Diao C, Yan Z, et al. Application of ex vivo 1H NMR metabonomics to the characterization and possible detection of renal cell carcinoma metastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138:753–61. 43. Wettersten HI, Hakimi A A, Morin D, Bianchi C, Johnstone ME, Donohoe DR, et al. Grade-dependent metabolic reprogramming in kidney cancer revealed by combined proteomics and metabolomics analysis. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:2541–52. 44. Hakimi AA, Reznik E, Lee CH, Creighton CJ, Brannon AR, Luna A, et al. An integrated metabolic atlas of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016; 29:104–16. 45. Trachootham D, Alexandre J, Huang P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009; 8:579–91. 46. Baylin SB. DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005; 2. DOI:10.1038/ncponc0354. 47. Morris MR, Latif F. The epigenetic landscape of renal cancer. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017; 13:47–60. 48. Joosten SC, Deckers IA, Aarts MJ, Hoeben A, van Roermund JG, Smits KM, et al. Prognostic DNA methylation markers for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review. Epigenomics. 2017; 9:1243–57. 49. Wei J-H, Haddad A, Wu K-J, Zhao H-W, Kapur P, Zhang Z-L, et al. A CpG-methylation-based assay to predict survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:8699. 50. Chen W, Zhuang J, Wang PP, Jiang J, Lin C, Zeng P, et al. DNA methylation-based classification and identification of renal cell carcinoma prognosis-subgroups. Cancer Cell Int. 2019; 19. DOI:10.1186/s12935-019-0900-4. 51. De Martino M, Klatte T, Haitel A, Marberger M. Serum cell-free DNA in renal cell carcinoma: A diagnostic and prognostic marker. Cancer. 2012; 118:82–90. 52. Allard WJ, Matera J, Miller MC, Repollet M, Connelly MC, Rao C, et al. Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10:6897–904. 53. Li G, Passebosc-Faure K, Gentil-Perret A, Lamber t C, Genin C, Tostain J. Cadherin-6 gene expression in conventional renal cell carcinoma: A useful marker to detect circulating tumor cells. Anticancer Res. 2005; 25:377–81. 54. Broncy L, Njima B Ben, Méjean A, Béroud C, Romdhane KB, Ilie M, et al. Single-cell genetic analysis validates cytopathological identification of circulating cancer cells in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018; 9:20058–74. 41SIUJ.ORG SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 Novel Expanding Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers 55. Redova M, Poprach A, Nekvindova J, Iliev R, Radova L, Lakomy R, et al. Circulating miR-378 and miR-451 in serum are potential biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2012; 10:1–8. 56. Faragalla H, Youssef YM, Scorilas A, Khalil B, White NMA, Mejia- Guerrero S, et al. The clinical utility of miR-21 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for renal cell carcinoma. J Mol Diagnostics. 2012; 14:385–92. 57. Von Brandenstein M, Pandarakalam JJ, Kroon L, Loeser H, Herden J, Braun G, et al. MicroRNA 15a, inversely correlated to PKC , is a potential marker to differentiate between benign and malignant renal tumors in biopsy and urine samples. Am J Pathol. 2012; 180:1787–97. 58. Roigas J, Schulze G, Raytarowski S, Jung K, Schnorr D, Loening SA. Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in plasma of patients with urological tumors. Tumor Biol. 2001; 22:282–5. 59. Weinberger R, Appel B, Stein A, Metz Y, Neheman A, Barak M. The pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (Tu M2-PK) as a tumour marker for renal cell carcinoma: Original article. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007; 16:333–7. 60. Zhang L, Jiang H, Xu G, Wen H, Gu B, Liu J, et al. Proteins S100A8 and S100A9 are potential biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma in the early stages: Results from a proteomic study integrated with bioinformatics analysis. Mol Med Rep. 2015; 11:4093–100. 61. Zhang L, Jiang H, Xu G, Chu N, Xu N, Wen H, et al. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential early diagnostic markers of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Biosci Trends. 2016; 10:210–9. 62. Yokomizo A, Takakura M, Kanai Y, Sakuma T, Matsubara J, Honda K, et al. Use of quantitative shotgun proteomics to identify fibronectin 1 as a potential plasma biomarker for clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Cancer Biomarkers. 2011; 10: 175–83. 63. Bluemke K, Bilkenroth U, Meye A, Fuessel S, Lautenschlaeger C, Goebel S, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with renal cell carcinoma correlates with prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18:2190–4. 64. Fedorko M, Stanik M, Iliev R, Redova-Lojova M, Machackova T, Svoboda M, et al. Combination of MiR-378 and MiR-210 serum levels enables sensitive detection of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16:23382–9. 65. Teixeira AL, Ferreira M, Silva J, Gomes M, Dias F, Joaquina S, et al. Higher circulating expression levels of miR-221 associated with poor overall survival in renal cell carcinoma patients. Tumor Biol. 2014; 35: 4057–66. 66. Vergho DC, Kneitz S, Kalogirou C, Burger M, Krebs M, Rosenwald A, et al. Impact of miR-21, miR-126 and miR-221 as prognostic factors of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus of the inferior vena cava. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e109877. 67. Chanudet E, Wozniak MB, Bouaoun L, Byrnes G, Mukeriya A, Zaridze D, et al. Large-scale genome-wide screening of circulating microRNAs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma reveals specific signatures in late-stage disease. Int J Cancer. 2017; 141:1730–40. 68. Redova M, Poprach A, Nekvindova J, Iliev R, Radova L, Lakomy R, et al. Circulating miR-378 and miR-451 in serum are potential biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2012; 10:55. 69. Vergho D, Kneitz S, Rosenwald A, Scherer C, Spahn M, Burger M, et al. Combination of expression levels of miR-21 and miR-126 is associated with cancer-specific survival in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:25. 70. Khella HWZ, Scorilas A, Mozes R, Mirham L, Lianidou E, Krylov SN, et al. Low expression of miR-126 Is a prognostic marker for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2015; 185:693–703. 71. Slaby O, Jancovicova J, Lakomy R, Svoboda M, Poprach A, Fabian P, et al. E xpression of miRNA-106b in conventional renal cell carcinoma is a potential marker for prediction of early metastasis after nephrectomy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 29:90. 72. Nakata W, Uemura M, Sato M, Fujita K, Jingushi K, Ueda Y, et al. Expression of miR-27a-3p is an independent predictive factor for recurrence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:21645–54. 73. Goto K, Oue N, Shinmei S, Sentani K, Sakamoto N, Naito Y, et al. Expression of miR-486 is a potential prognostic factor after nephrectomy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013; 1:235–40. 74. Ishihara T, Seki N, Inoguchi S, Yoshino H, Tatarano S, Yamada Y, et al. Expression of the tumor suppressive miRNA-23b/27b cluster is a good prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2014; 192:1822–30. 75. Xue S, Li Q-W, Che J-P, Guo Y, Yang F-Q, Zheng J-H. Decreased expression of long non-coding RNA NBAT-1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8:3765–74. 76. Nisman B, Yutkin V, Nechushtan H, Gofrit ON, Peretz T, Gronowitz S, et al. Circulating tumor M2 pyruvate kinase and thymidine kinase 1 are potential predictors for disease recurrence in renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Urology. 2010; 76:513.e1-6. 77. Gayed BA, Gillen J, Christie A, Peña-Llopis S, Xie X-J, Yan J, et al. Prospective evaluation of plasma levels of ANGPT2, TuM2PK, and VEGF in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol. 2015; 15:24. 78. Vasudev NS, Sim S, Cairns DA, Ferguson RE, Craven RA, Stanley A, et al. Pre-operative urinar y cathepsin D is associated with survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101:1175–82. 79. An HJ, Koh HM, Song DH. S100A8 expression may have a prognostic value in CCRCC reflecting TNM staging and Fuhrman nuclear grade. Anticancer Res. 2019; 39:4681–5. 42 SIUJ • Volume 2, Number 1 • January 2021 SIUJ.ORG MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY: ICUD-WUOF CONSULTATION http://SIUJ.org