Open access journal: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology ISSN: 0361-6525 DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i1.1256Sociobiology 64(1): 85-91 (March, 2017) First Characterization of Sphingomyeline Phosphodiesterase Expression in the Bumblebee, Bombus lantschouensis Introduction Sphingomyeline phosphodiesterase (SMase) is a hydrolytic enzyme that is involved in metabolic reactions of sphingolipids. SMase generates ceramide through the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to phosphocholine and ceramide to regulate the ceramide-mediated cell (Ago et al., 2006; Hofmann et al., 2000; Kramer et al., 2015). Sphingomyeline phosphodiesterase gene (SMPD) was first cloned from Bacillus cereus (Yamada et al., 1988). SMases are classified into three categories based on its pH activity profiles. For the optimal activity pH value, the acid SMase (aSMases) was reported to be 4.5~5 (Brady et al., 1966; Jenkins et al., 2009), Abstract The bumblebee (Bombus lantschouensis Vogt) is an important pollinator of wild plants. Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase (SMPD) is a hydrolase that plays a major role in sphingolipid metabolism reactions. We report the preparation and characterization of a polyclonal antibody for bumblebee SMPD. We then use the polyclonal antiserum to detect the SMPD protein at different development stages and in different tissues. Our results showed that a 1228bp fragment homologous with the B. terrestris SMPD gene was successfully amplified. The molecular weight of the fusion protein was about 70kDa by SDS-PAGE. An effective polyclonal antibody against SMPD was also obtained from mice and found to have a higher specificity for bumblebee SMPD. Western blotting detection showed that SMPD was expressed at a high level in queen ovaries, although expression was lower in the midgut and venom gland. SMPD expression decreased from the egg stage until the pbl pupal stage. We interpret our results as showing that the development of an effective polyclonal antiserum for the SMPD protein of a bumblebee, which provides a tool for exploring the function of the SMPD gene. In addition, the work has confirmed that SMPD should be considered as an important enzyme during bumblebee egg and larval stages. Sociobiology An international journal on social insects L Han1, 2, S He2, J Dong1, Y Wang1, J Huang1, J Wu1 Article History Edited by Evandro Nascimento Silva, UEFS, Brazil Received 24 November 2016 Initial acceptance 27 February 2017 Final acceptance 05 March 2017 Publication date 29 May 2017 Keywords Bombus lantschouensis, SMPDgene, gene clone, prokaryotic expression, polyclonal antibody, expression characteristics. Corresponding author Jie Wu (JW); Jiaxing Huang (JH) Key Laboratory for Insect-Pollinator Biology Institute of Apicultural Research, CAAS Beijing 100093, CHINA E-Mail: apis@vip.sina.com huangjiaxing@caas.cn neutral SMase (nSMases) near pH 7 (Sabourdy et al., 2008), and the alkaline SMase is about pH 9 (Kraut, 2011). Among these sphingomyelinases, the acid SMase was the most explored in the past few years (Brady et al., 1966; Jenkins et al., 2009; Bartelsen et al., 1998). Currently, it has been reported that SMase is correlated to many human diseases, such as Niemann- Pick, lung or liver diseases, neuronal disorders, sepsis organ failure, non-hemolytic enterotoxin, and regulation of immune response (Ago et al., 2006; Horinouchi et al., 1995; Smith & Schuchman 2008; Doll et al., 2013). It has been demonstrated that the function of SMase can inhibit colonic cancer and colitis (Herterving et al., 1997; Sjöqvist 1 - Key Laboratory of Insect-Pollinator Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China 2 - Eastern Bee Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China RESEARCH ARTICLE - BEES L Han et al. – Bumblebee development affected by SMPD86 et al., 2002). Moreover, increased secretion levels of SMase could also lead to accelerated at herogenesis (Truman et al., 2011). Although the function of SMase in human research has been explained clearly, little work has been done on insect SMase, except in flies. Based on the homology analysis of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophiloidade) genome, five paralogues of SMPD gene were annotated and research explorations have demonstrated that they are highly expressed at flies embryonic development stages (Renault et al., 2002). Furthermore, based on microarray analysis, it was found that SMPD expression levels decreased with the sugar regulation (Zinke et al., 2002). Interestingly, it was suggested that the silence of SMPD gene by siRNA has strong influence on pregnancy and progeny development in Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidade) (Benoit et al., 2012). However, the function of SMPD in bees hasn’t been explored. Bombus lantschouensis Vogt (Hymenoptera: Apidae) is a native bumblebee species that play an important role for wild plant pollination in China (Peng et al., 2009; An et al., 2010). Furthermore, it has been a candidate species for year round rearing and greenhouse crop pollination in recent years. The investigations of basic biology of B.lantschouensis are very important for its successful year round rearing. According to a comparative proteomics analysis, SMPD gene was found to be significantly different in expressions between egg-laying and non-egg-laying queens (Unpublished data). Therefore, it was important to explore the basic biology of SMPD in bumblebee. Since SMPD plays an important role in sphingolipid metabolic reactions, investigating SMPD protein profileswill help us to understand its functions in bumblebees. In this study, we described the clone and expression of the recombinant protein with a partial fragment of SMPD gene from B. lantschouensis. The fusion protein was purified as antigen for antiserum preparation against mice. Furthermore, the specificity of antiserum was validated on His-tag expression fusion protein and original bumblebee protein. Finally, the SMPD expression profile was detected at the different tissues and development stages of B. lantschouensis by western blotting. This antiserum can be used to explore the function of SMPD gene in further research. Materials and Methods Bumblebees Colonies of B. lantschouensis were obtained from Department of Insect Pollination and Ecology laboratory of Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The colonies were supplied with pollen pellet and sugar syrup (1:1) every other day. The rearing boxes were kept at a temperature of 28 ± 2°C and 60 ± 10% relative humidity according to a method described by Kwon (Kwon et al., 2003). All samples were prepared and kept at -80°C until used. SMPD amplification and fusion expression vector construction The total RNA was isolated from the abdomen of B. lantschouensis workers through a technique that uses TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The complementary DNA was synthesized from 1μg of RNA using a kit (Takara, Dalian, China) following manufacturer’s manual. The forward primer 5'-CCGGAATTCAACAGTTTGTGGCGTTGTTCTA-3' and reverse primer 5'- AAATATGCGGCCGCGTGTTTCA TTCTTTGCTGCTG-3' with NotI and EcoRI restriction enzyme sites were designed and used to amplify SMPD coding gene sequence. At the same time, a pair of similar primers with EcoRI and SacI restriction enzyme sites was synthesized for His-tag plasmid construction. PCR amplification reaction system contained1μl cDNA template,0.5 μM of each primer, and 10 μl of the PCR mix and finally topped to 20 μl volume with nuclease-free water. PCR was performed under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of amplification (with 30 sec of denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec of annealing at 56°C, 1.5 min of extension at 72°C, and 10 min of further elongation at 72°C). The PCR products amplified were then sequenced (SinoGenoMax, Beijing) from both ends to validate the SMPD amplicon. PCR products were purified and digested with NotI and EcoRI restriction enzymes for pGEX-6P-1 vector recombination and EcoRI and SacI restriction enzymes for pCold-II vector recombination. More specifically, the digested PCR products were gel purified and ligated into pGEX-6P-1 and pCold-II vectors using T4 DNA ligase at 16°C. The ligated constructs were transformed into E. coliBL21 (DE3) competent cells and cultured overnight at 37°C. We selected an ampicillin-resistant clone and sub-cultured in 5mL LB liquid medium to obtain optimum amount of the expression vector. Expression and purification of the fusion protein Positive clones of E. coli BL21 were cultured at 37°C in ampicillin containing LB liquid medium. Isopropy-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to the culture at a final concentration of 1 mmol/L when the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached a value of 0.6~0.8 to induce expression of fusion protein. After 5 hours incubation, the culture was centrifuged for 3 min at 10000g at 4°C to collect the cell. The precipitate was washed 3 times in 10 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min at 6000g and 4°C. Cells was re-suspended in 15 mL PBS and sonicated with 400W at 6s and 15s interval for 90 cycles. Cells were centrifuged again for 10 min at 6000g and 4°C. The supernatant and precipitate were collected separately. The precipitate was then diluted in PBS, and 2× loading buffer was added and boiled at 100°C for 5 min. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was used to check the characteristics of protein expressions. The expressed recombinant protein band was cut from the gel and eluted in phosphate-buffered saline and kept at -80°C until used (Yu et al., 2007). Sociobiology 64(1): 85-91 (March, 2017) 87 Production of polyclonal antibodies and western blotting validation Fifty μg of purified recombinant protein was injected into BALB/c type female mice (6 weeks old) with an equal volume of Freund’s complete adjuvant. This was immunized for the second time after two weeks. Negative serum was collected from the injected mice’s tail before immunization. The tail of experimental mice was cut to check the antibody through western blotting two weeks after the final immunization. Blood was sampled from mice eyes and centrifuged at 5000 rpm and 4°C for 20 min. The serum was decanted and stored at -80°C for further use. Polyclonal antibody specificity was then checked using western blotting. At this step, total protein from B. lantschouensis was extracted and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, then the gel was transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane in a western blot system (BioRad, USA) for 60 min. Nitrocellulose (NC) membrane was blocked with a commercial blocking buffer for 1.5 hours (ComWin, Beijing). The polyclonal antibody was diluted at a ratio of 1:3000 and used for incubating with the transferred NC membrane. The membrane was then washed three times with 1*TBST containing 0.1% Tween 20 and the europium chelate coated mice IgG was used as secondary antibody to be incubated with NC membrane. Finally, the treated NC membrane was scanned and images were detected on microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, USA). SMPD expression characteristics in bumblebee In order to understand the SMPD expression status, total proteins from different tissues and development stages of B. lantschouensis queens and workers were extracted and protein concentration was determined using a BCA method. Twenty μg of total protein was then electrophoresed by SDS- PAGE and immunoblotting was carried out as described above. Protein expression levels in different tissues (antenna, head, muscle, leg, body wall, midgut, fat body, ovary, and poison gland) of three egg-laying queens were quantified. The different development stages including eggs, larvae (at day 5 and 10) and pupae (Pw, PP, Pb, Pb1, Pbdand Pha) were also detected for the protein expression levels (Duchateau & Velthuis, 1989; Dallacqua et al., 2007). Results SMPD cDNA cloning and construction of its expression vector A part of SMPD cDNA was PCR amplified using a pair of specific primers designed from B.terrestris cDNA sequence and PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% Agarose gel. According to the result, a PCR product with NotI and EcoRI restriction enzyme sites has produced a clear band at about 1200 bp (Fig 1). Furthermore, the DNA sequence and homogenous analyses of this product has clearly elucidated that it is a segment of SMPD gene. It has been also predicted that its relative molecular mass and isoelectric point were 50.8 kDa and 6.17, respectively. The PCR product was subcloned into the pGEX-6P-1 expression vector, and verified with double enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing (Fig 2). Moreover, the recombinant vectorpGEX-6P-1-SMPD was successfully transformed into E. Coli BL21 (DE3) cells. Fig 2. Recombinant plasmid pGEX-6P-1-SMPD validated by restriction enzyme EcoRI and NotI at agarose gel electrophoresis. M, molecular mass marker D2000; lane 1,pGEX-6P-1 empty plasmid; lane 2, pGEX-6P- 1-SMPD recombinant plasmid; lane 3,pGEX-6P-1-SMPD recombinant plasmid product cut by enzyme EcoRIand NotI; lane 4: SMPDPCR amplification product. Fig 1. PCR amplification of SMPD gene sequence from B. lantschouensis. M, molecular mass marker D2000; lane 1 and 2, amplified product (about 1200bp). Recombinant protein expression and purification Small-scale culture of positive pGEX-6P-1-SMPD clone was induced by IPTG to express the recombinant protein. Accordingly, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that the fusion protein has been successfully expressed at an expected molecular mass of about 70 kDa. Simultaneously, a similar protein band was not observed from the control treatment lanes (Fig 3). Large-scale expression of SMPD fusion protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and the predicted L Han et al. – Bumblebee development affected by SMPD88 SMPD band was then collected. Furthermore, electrophoresis has confirmed that the fusion protein was the major band on the SDS-PAGE indicating its purity (Fig 4) which further indicated that we have successfully obtained the fusion GST- SMPD protein from E. coli. Fig 4. Purified GST-SMPD protein separated in SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. M, protein molecular weight standards; lane1, recombinant protein was purified by gel isolation. Fig 3. SDS-PAGE profile of SMPD expressed in pGEX-6P-1/BL21 system. M, protein molecular weight standards; lane 1, protein expressed in BL21 cell with pGEX-6P-1-SMPD plasmid; lane 2, protein expressed in BL21 cell with un-induced pGEX-6P-1-SMPD plasmid; lanes 3 and 4, protein expressed in BL21 cell with induced and un- induced pGEX-6P-1 plasmid respectively. Polyclonal antibody preparation and western blot identification In this experiment, 500 μL of blood samples were collected from each of the experimental mouse at the end of two mice immunizations. Furthermore, the antiserum was then divided into aliquot 200 μL tubes and stored at -80°C until use. Accordingly, Western blot analysis of the SMPD polyclonal and His-tag monoclonal antibodies against His- SMPD fusion protein demonstrated that both antibodies produced a similar band size at about 40 kDa (Fig 5). The SMPD polyclonal antibody which was hybridized with the bumblebee protein produced a 70 kDa protein band as was expected. Simultaneously, the pre-immunized mice serum, the negative control, didn’t produce a detectable band signal (Fig 6). Based on the results from western blotting, it has been confirmed that we have successfully developed the SMPD polyclonal antibody for the first time which could be used to characterize SMPD protein in the future. Fig 5. SMPD polyclonalantibody (a) and His-tag monoclonal antibody (b) against the expressed His-SMPD fusion protein. Fig 6. Polyclonal antibody and negative antiserum hybrid with bumblebee total protein using western blotting. Sociobiology 64(1): 85-91 (March, 2017) 89 Expression characteristics of SMPD in bumblebee In order to understand the expression profile of SMPD in bumblebee, the developed polyclonal antibody was used to detect SMPD expression levels at different tissues and developmental stages of B. lantschouensis. Accordingly, western blotting analysis showed significantly varied in SMPD expression levels base on the same loading volume of total protein electrophoresis. Among the nine majorly considered tissues, seven (antenna, head, muscle, leg, body wall, fat body and ovary) of them were detected with signals on western blotting. More specifically, SMPD was highly expressed in the muscle, ovary and head. However, we didn’t detect SMPD expression in the midgut and venom gland (Fig 7(a)). Furthermore, it has been confirmed that SMPD expression decreased with increasing developmental stages. Specifically, its expression levels were higher at egg and 5 days old larvae whereas SMPD expression levels were lower at the pbd and Pha developmental stages (Fig 7(b)). According to our experiment, SMPD gene recombinant plasmid was successfully constructed and expressed in a prokaryotic expression system which was a fast and inexpensive way to obtain plenty of interesting proteins. Despite the high solubility of GST fusion protein, we didn’t get solubilized proteins during the expression conditions of our experiment. It was, thus, confirmed that there was no fusion protein found in the supernatant of cell disruption which may be associated with the high efficiency expression of pGEX-6P-1 system (Zhao et al., 2000; Ding et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2011). Therefore, it needs to change the expression to acquire the soluble protein for studying the activity of SMPD. As western blot results of this work suggested, fusion protein from prokaryotic expression had immunogenicity characteristics and successfully produced the SMPD polyclonal antibody in mice. Both the His-tag antigen and bumblebee total protein western Blot demonstrated that the polyclonal antibody was effective and specific to SMPD protein. Generally, the specificity of this kind of polyclonal antibody has been found to be lower than the monoclonal antibody (Chu & Englund, 2013). However, our Western blots suggested that the specificity of this kind was higher than expected which may require using a Eu-labeled goat anti-mouse kit which also could improve sensitivity and reduce background to guaranty higher blotting quality (Park et al., 2015; Lynch et al., 2016). SMPD protein has been described to play an important role in sphingolipid metabolism reactions. In line with this, consequently, we have found that SMPD expression was higher at the early ages (egg and larval stages) of a bumblebee. This is because SMPD might be produced at those stages in higher quantity to involve in sphingolipids metabolism. In this case, similar results were reported from Drosophila embryos (Renault et al., 2002). Furthermore, higher expression of SMPD observed at ovary and head could imply that these regions might be the functional sites of SMPD in bumblebees. In conclusion, this study has displayed successful amplification of SMPD gene cDNA fragment from bumblebee for the first time. AGST-SMPD recombinant protein was successfully expressed in E. coli and a highly specific polyclonal antibody against SMPD was produced. The antibody has also demonstrated that it can serve as a good tool in the analysis of SMPD protein profiles in future studies. Moreover, SMPD expression has indicated that its role might be associated with egg and larvae development. Finally, we believe that this work could provide an immense importance in further investigation of SMPD functions in bumblebees. Acknowledgements At this point, we would like to thank Abebe Jenberie and Tolera Kumsa for their help during manuscript revision. This work was financially supported by China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45) and CAAS Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAASASTIP-2015-IAR). Fig 7. Expression levels of SMPD proteinat different tissues(a) and different development stages(b) determinedusing prepared polyclonal antibody. The different tissues include: antenna (An), head (He), muscle (Mu), leg (Le), body wall (Bw), midgut (Mi), fat body (Fb), ovary (Ov) and poison gland (Pg) of the queen. Likewise, the differentstages include: egg, larvae atday 5, larvae atday 10, Pw, Pp, Pb, Pbl, Pbd and Pha stage. Discussion Recently, the development of next generation sequencing technologies made the predictions about biological features in the genome of non-model organisms easier. Furthermore, such technologies also facilitated and supported the possible characterization of more and more novel genes and proteins. Based on Bombus terrestris Vogt (Hymenoptera: Apidae) genome annotation and previously conducted experiment in our laboratory, SMPD was identified from different expressed proteins by comparing hemolymph proteome of egg-laying and non-egg-laying queens. In this current study, SMPD gene was cloned from B. lantschouensis for the first time. Concurrently, it was implicated that SMPD is involved in the mammalian oocyte apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2009). Thus, this could be explained that SMPD is possibly involved in regulating egg-laying in bumblebee. L Han et al. – Bumblebee development affected by SMPD90 References Ago, H., Oda, M., Takahashi, M., Tsuge,H., Ochi, S., Katunuma, N., Miyano, M. & Sakurai, J. (2006). Structural basis of the sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase activity in neutral sphingomyelinase from Bacillus cereus. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281: 16157-16167. doi: 10.1074/jbc. M601089200 An, J.D., Huang, J.X., Williams, P.H., Wu, J. & Zhou, B.F. (2010). Species diversity and colony characteristics of bumblebees in the Hebei region of North China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21: 1542-1550. Bartelsen, O., Lansmann, S., Nettersheim, M., Lemm, T., Ferlinz, K. & Sandhoff, K. (1998).Expression of recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase in insect Sf21 cells: purification, processing and enzymatic characterization. Journal of Biotechnology, 63: 29-40. doi: 10.1016/S0168- 1656(98)00070-4 Benoit, J.B., Attardo, G.M., Michalkova, V., Takáč, P., Bohova, J. & Aksoy, S.(2012).Sphingomyelinase activity in mother’s milk is essential for juvenile development: a case from lactating tsetse flies. Biology of Reproduction, 87: 1-10. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.100008 Brady, R.O., Kanfer, J.N., Mock, M.B. & Fredrickson, D.S. (1966).The metabolism of sphingomyelin, II. Evidence of an enzymatic deficiency in Niemann-Pick diseae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,USA, 55: 366-369. Chu, H.Y. & Englund, J.A. (2013). Respiratory syncytial virus disease: prevention and treatment. In: L.J. Anderson & B.S. Graham (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for respiratory syncytial virus vaccines (pp. 235-258). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Dallacqua, R.P., Simões, Z.L.P. & Bitondi, M.M.G. (2007). Vitellogenin gene expression in stingless bee workers differing in egg-laying behavior. Insectes Sociaux, 54: 70-76. doi: 10.1007/s00040-007-0913-1 Ding, S.Q., Wang, J., Wang, S.J., Zhang, Y. & Zhao, W.(2006). Echinococcus granulosus 2 heat shock protein 70 gene: construction of recombinant plasmid, prokaryotic expression, purification and characterization. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, 22: 764-763. Doll, V.M., Ehling-Schulz, M. & Vogelmann, R. (2013). Concerted action of sphingomyelinase and non-hemolytic enterotoxin in pathogenic Bacillus cereus. PLoS One, 8: e61404-e61404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061404 Duchateau, M.J. & Velthuis, H.H.W. (1989). Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 51: 199-213. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1989.tb01231.x Herterving, E., Nilsson, Å., Nyberg, L. & Duan, R.D. (1997). Alkaline sphingomyelinase activity is decreased in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer, 79: 448-453. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142 Hofmann,K., Tomiuk, S., Wolff, G. & Stoffel, W. (2000). Cloning and characterization of the mammalian brain-specific, Mg2+-dependent neutral sphingomyelinase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97: 5895-5900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5895 Horinouchi, K., Erlich, S., Perl, D.P., Ferlinz, K., Bisgaier, C.L., Sandhoff, K., Desnick, R.J., Stewart, C.L. & Schuchman, E.H. (1995). Acid sphingomyelinase deficient mice: a model of types A and B Niemann-Pick disease. Nature Genetics, 10: 288-293.doi:10.1038/ng0795-288 Jenkins, R.W., Canals, D. & Hannun, Y.A. (2009). Roles and regulation of secretory and lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase. Cellular Signalling, 21: 836-846.doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2009. 01.026 Kramer, M., Quickert, S., Sponholz, C., Menzel, U., Huse, K., Platzer, M., Bauer, M. & Claus, R.A. (2015). Alternative splicing of SMPD1 in human sepsis. PLoS One, 10(4): e0124503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124503 Kraut, R. (2011). Roles of sphingolipids in Drosophila, development and disease. Journal of Neurochemistry, 116: 764-778. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07022.x Kwon, Y.J., Saeed, S. & Duchateau, M.J. (2003).Stimulation of colony initiation and colony development in Bombus terrestris by adding a male pupa: the influence of age and orientation. Apidologie, 34: 429-437. doi: 10.1051/apido: 2003039 Liu, Z.Z., Hao, L., Fan, T., He, H.G., You, H.G., Tang, R.C. & Han, C.H. (2011). Construction and identification of prokaryotic expression vector of human TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 27: 59-62. Lynch, A.P., O’Sulliva, F. & Ahearne, M. (2016). The effect of growth factor supplementation on corneal stromal cell phenotype in vitro using a serum-free media. Experimental Eye Research, 151: 26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.015 Park, J.H., Choi, J.W., Ju, E.J., Pae, A.N. & Park, K.D. (2015). Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of a natural compound, Shizukahenriol, through Nrf2 activation. Molecules, 20: 15989-16003. doi: 10.3390/molecules200915989 Peng, W.J., Huang, J. X., Wu, J. & An, J.D. (2009).Geographic distribution and bionomics of six bumblebee species in North China. Chinese Bulletinof Entomology, 46: 115-120. Renault, A.D., Starz-Gaiano, M. & Lehmann, R. (2002). Metabolism of sphingosine 1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid: a genome wide analysis of gene expression in Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development, 119: S293-S301. doi: 10.1016/ S0925-4773(03)00131-X Sociobiology 64(1): 85-91 (March, 2017) 91 Sabourdy, F., Kedjouar, B., Sorli, S.C., Colié, S., Milhas, D., Salma, Y. & Levade, T. (2008).Functions of sphingolipid metabolism in mammals-Lessons from genetic defects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1781: 145-183.doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.01.004 Sjöqvist, U., Hertervig, E., Nilsson, Å., Duan, R.D., Öst, Å., Tribukait, B. & Löfberg, R. (2002). Chronic colitis is associated with a reduction of mucosal alkaline sphingomyelinase activity. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 8: 258–263. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200207000-00004 Smith, E.L. &Schuchman, E.H. (2008). The unexpected role of acid sphingomyelinase in cell death and the pathophysiology of common diseases. The Faseb Journal, 22: 3419-3431. doi:10.1096/fj.08-108043 Truman, J.P., Al Gadban, M.M., Smith, K.J. & Hammad, S.M. (2011). Acid sphingomyelinase in macrophage biology. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 68: 3293-3305. doi: 10. 1007/s00018-011-0686-6 Yamada, A., Tsukagoshi, N., Udaka, S., Sasaki, T., Makino, S., Nakamura, S., Little, C., Tomita, M. & Ikezawa, H. (1988). Nucleotide sequence and expression in Escherichia coli of the gene coding for sphingomyelinase of Bacillus cereus. European Journal of Biochemistry, 175: 213–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14186.x Yu, Z.J., Ma, X.N. & Zhou, J.H. (2007). A modified method for purification of inclusion bodies proteins in Gel slices. Biotechnology, 17: 46-48. Zhang, R.L., Meng, J.X., Wen, A.M., Huang, Y.S., Zhou, C.Q., Wang, K.& Chen, X.G. (2009). siRNAs targetting sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1 protect mouse oocytes from apoptosis. Journal of Southern Medical University, 29: 2165-2170. Zhao, W., Su, C., Wu, H.W., Hu, X.M., Shen, L., Wang, R.Z., Ma, L., Chen, S.Z. & Zhang, Z.S. (2000). Construction of recombinant pGEX-6P-1/Sj-FABPc and expression in E.coli. Journal of Tropical Diseases and Parasitology, 12: 261-264. Zinke, I., Schütz, C.S., Katzenberger, J.D., Bauer, M. & Pankratz, M.J. (2002). Nutrient control of gene expression in Drosophila : microarray analysis of starvation and sugar- dependent response. The Embo Journal, 21: 6162-6173. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf600