Checklist of Social.indd Open access journal: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology ISSN: 0361-6525 Sociobiology 60(1): 101-106 (2013) Checklist of Social (Polistinae) and Solitary (Eumeninae) Wasps from a Fragment of Cer- rado “Campo Sujo” in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul YC Grandinete1 FB Noll2 Introduction Wasps are commonly known by their great variety of nest construction and, sometimes, their painful stings. With more than 5,000 species (Pickett & Carpenter, 2010), Vespi- dae has six known subfamilies (Carpenter, 1982; Pickett & Carpenter, 2010): Euparagiinae, Stenogastrinae, Masarinae, Eumeninae, Polistinae and Vespinae. In Brazil, only Masari- nae, Eumeninae and Polistinae are recorded (Carpenter & Marques, 2001). Polistinae wasps are the well-studied group, although it comprises only one fifth of the diversity of the family (Pick- ett & Carpenter, 2010). They are used as a model of evolu- tion of social behavior but, besides that, they are considered as important “ecological engineers” (Jones et al. 1994), be- cause they change the physical environment and affect the availability of resources for other organisms (Kears et al., 1998; Alonso & Agosti, 2000; Kaspari, 2000). Besides that, they contribute for the soil formation, biological control, Abstract Cerrado is one of the richest biomes in the world but it is still very threatened by human actions that affect not only the flora, but also the fauna, and certainly the largest known group, the insects. We present here a list of species of Polistinae and Eumeninae wasps, based on three different methodologies in a fragment of Cerrado “campo sujo”, very affected by livestock raising, on Paranaíba, Mato Grosso do Sul state. We recorded 22 species of Polistinae within 8 genera, with Polybia and Age- laia as the most representative. For Eumeninae, 21 species within 10 genera were recorded, with Montezumia and Pachodynerus as the most representative. Further- more, this work shows the first records of Eumeninae on Mato Grosso do Sul state and some new of Polistinae, compared to the literature. Sociobiology An international journal on social insects 1 - Universidade de São Paulo (FFCLRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil 2 - Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil RESEaRCh aRtiClE - WaSPS Article History Edited by: Fabio Nascimento, USP - Brazil Received 24 October 2012 initial acceptance 11 December 2012 Final acceptance 14 February 2013 Keywords Cerrado, Polistinae, Eumeninae, Wasps. Corresponding author Yuri Campanholo Grandinete Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e letras de Ribeirão Preto av. Bandeirantes, 3900. Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 14040-901 E-Mail: grandineteyc@gmail.com pollination (Van Mele & Cuc, 2000). According to Pickett and Carpenter (2010), this cosmopolitan subfamily has 958 described species in 26 genera, but the main diversity is in the Neotropical region, mainly in Brazil, with 21 genera and 304 recognized species (Carpenter, 2004). Commonly known as “Potter wasps” due to the shape of the brood cells of some species, Eumeninae is the most diverse in Vespidae with more than 3,500 described spe- cies in 210 genera and Brazil has approximately 277 spe- cies in 31 genera (Pickett & Carpenter, 2010). These wasps have solitary behavior, however there are some species with primitively social behavior, like Zethus miniatus de Sau- ssure, which groups of females build communal nests made by plant material and resin (Bohart & Stange, 1965; West- Eberhard, 1987). According to MMA (2010), the Cerrado has 5% of all biodiversity from the planet. It is the richest biome in the world, although it is one of the most threatened. In Brazil, it is the second in extension and, until 2008 the biome had YC Grandinete, FB Noll - Social and Solitary Wasps from Cerrado102 already lost almost 50% of the original vegetation, because it has conducive characteristics to agriculture, livestock and the demand for charcoal for the steel industry. This dynam- ics of substitution includes deforestation and forest fire, causing environmental changes, habitat fragmentation, spe- cies extinction, invasion of exotic species, erosion, aquifer pollution, siltation of rivers and the imbalance of the carbon cycle. Although it is obvious the importance of the Cerrado and its biodiversity and preservation (Oliveira & Marquis, 2002), there are still a few studies focusing on insects, main- ly wasps, which still need more research on their taxonomy, phylogenetic, behavior and ecology. For these reasons, this study was conducted to improve the knowledge or Polistinae and Eumeninae of Cerrado, giving the first records of soli- tary wasps to Mato Grosso do Sul state, and updating those from Polistinae. Material and Methods The study was conducted on Paranaíba municipality, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, more specifically at “Fazenda Prata” (19º 48’45.83’’ S; 51º 06’ 25.22’’ O), in a “campo sujo” Cerrado, characterized by a mixed flora, comprised of forests and grassland elements. Besides that, the area has herbaceous vegetation, with predominance of Poaceae, many shrubs and arboretums (Coutinho, 1978, 2002). Data sampling was carried out on a monthly basis, between October 2009 and September 2010, for five con- secutive days, except in November due to constant rainfall. Three methodologies were used to evaluate the diversity of Polistinae and Eumeninae: i) Ten “attractive traps” were made by using PET bottles, where two openings were made with approximately 50 cm2 on center (adapted from Jacques et al., 2012) and later they were strung and hung (using string) on vegetation between a 1.5 m and 2.0 m from the soil. Inside the bottles we put industrial orange juice solution (about 200 ml juice per bottle) to attract the wasps. Each month, we chose a ran- dom transect and set the “attractive traps” up along a 200 m, transect 20 m apart from each other. The traps were installed on the first and third days, the insects were collected and the orange juice was exchanged. On the fifth day, the same procedure was performed. The insects were kept on 70% al- cohol for being pinned and identified later; ii) active collection, with entomological net. In each collection, 40 plants with flowers were chosen randomly and the insects were collected during five minutes per plant; iii) Attractive solution (Noll & Gomes, 2009). This method uses a 10l dorsal spray bag, which contained the attractive solution made of a water based solution of crys- tal sugar (sucrose – 200g/l) and salt (sodium chloride – 25 g/l). The attractive solution was sprayed in 10 points equally separated within a 200 m transect. At each point, an aver- age of 500 ml of solution was applied. The application was done following a zigzag pattern from left to right, generally applied on green vegetation, with solar incidence in an area of 3 m2. After the application of the attractive solution, each point was individually observed for five minutes and wasps that visited these points were collected with an entomologi- cal net. After collecting wasps at the 10 points, the solution was applied again at every point. Four applications were made during the day, usually between the periods from 10:00 h to 16:00 h. Results and Discussion Polistinae We collected 574 specimens of social wasps, be- longing to 22 species within eight genera: Agelaia, Apoica, Brachygastra, Mischocyttarus, Parachartergus, Polistes, Polybia and Synoeca (Table 1). The most representative ge- nus was Polybia (46.51%), followed by Polistes and Mis- chocyttarus, although this last had only one or two species collected. Polybia Lepeletier is the group within Epiponini (Vespidae: Polistinae) with the great number of species (58, being 44 in Brazil), and it is considered the most common genera of social wasps on South America (Richards, 1978; Carpenter & Marques, 2001). The most collected species was Agelaia pallipes (Table 1), having almost a half of the abundance of social wasps (42.68%). Agelaia is the third most representative genus on Epiponini and has species that build huge nests with millions of wasps (Zucchi et al., 1995; Carpenter, 2004). The other species whose had the most rep- resentative were Polybia sericea (20.55%), P. occidentalis (13.24%) and P. ignobilis (10.10%). There are only a few studies on the distribution, col- ony density and species seasonality from the Cerrado: Diniz and Kitayama (1998) in Mato Grosso state, Henriques et al. (1992) and Raw (1998b) in Distrito Federal, Mechi (1996) and Mechi and Moraes (2000) in São Paulo, Elpino-Campos et al. (2007) and Souza and Prezoto (2006) in Minas Gerais and Pereira & Antonialli-Junior (2011) and Pereira-Bomfim and Antonialli-Junior (2012) in Mato Grosso do Sul (in a Riparian Forest). In other ecosystems, Silva-Pereira and Santos (2006) studied wasp diversity in “Campos Rupes- tres”, Silveira (2002) and Silveira et al. (2008) in Amazon Rainforest, Santos et al. (2007) in Mangrove, Atlantic Forest and Restinga Vegetation and Souza et al. (2010) in Riparian Forest. The predominance of Agelaia pallipes was similar to the results of Elpino-Campos et al. (2007), who collected 29 species of social wasps distributed in 10 genera in four different areas, and Mechi (1996) collected 32 species with- in nine genera in two different areas. Diniz and Kitayama (1998) sampled 36 species, the large part of them belong- Sociobiology 60(1): 101-106 (2013) 103 era (Table 2). The most representative genera were Mont- ezumia and Pachodynerus, followed by Zethus and the most sampled species was Montezumia nigriceps (15%), Pacho- dynerus brachygaster (13.2%) and Alphamenes campanu- latus (11.3%). Eumenines have solitary behavior and build their nests, commonly, with plant resin, mud, in pre-existing cavities and even on surfaces (Evans, 1966; Cowan, 1991; Camillo et al., 1995, 1997). For these reasons, maybe it is more difficult to capture them than social wasps, whose build a variety kinds of nests, many times with character- istics that make possible to identify genera or even species (Wenzel, 1998). One of the most representative work that sampled specimens of Eumeninae from Cerrado was Mechi (2006), who collected 35 species within 16 genera, but there are other authors who sampled solitary wasps Cerrado, but they used trap-nests methodology, which restrict the sampling to species that make nests on pre-existing cavities (Camillo et al., 1995; Camillo & Assis, 1997). On other ecosystems, Hermes and Köhler (2004) collected 37 species in the Green Belt of “Rio Grande do Sul” and Morato (2001), on Central Amazon, colleted four species, although all of them were identified to genera. In the last years, due to anthropic actions (espe- cially agriculture and pasture), the physiognomies found in Mato Grosso do Sul have suffered intense degradation. These modifications cause environmental fragmentation Table 1. Species of social wasps sampled in “Fazenda Prata”, Paranaíba, state of Mato Grosso do Sul. Species Abundance Proportion (%) Agelaia pallipes (Olivier) 245 42.6 Apoica flavissima Van der Vetch 2 0.34 Brachygastra augusti (de Saussure) 1 0.17 Brachygastra lecheguana (Latreille) 5 0.87 Brachygastra moebiana (de Saussure) 1 0.17 Mischocyttarus frontalis (Fox) 1 0.17 Mischocyttarus latior (Fox) 1 0.17 Mischocyttarus cerberus Ducke 2 0.34 Mischocyttarus mattogrossoensis Zikán 1 0.17 Parachartergus smithii (de Saussure) 4 0.69 Polistes canadensis (Linnaeus) 7 1.21 Polistes billardieri Fabricius 12 2.09 Polistes subsericeus de Saussure 5 0.87 Polistes versicolor (Olivier) 16 2.78 Polybia ignobilis (Haliday) 58 10.10 Polybia jurinei (de Saussure) 8 1.39 Polybia liliacea (Fabricius) 5 0.87 Polybia occidentalis (Olivier) 76 13.24 Polybia paulista (Von Ihering) 1 0.17 Polybia ruficeps (Richards) 1 0.17 Polybia sericea (Olivier) 118 20.55 Synoeca surinama (Linnaeus) 4 0.69 TOTAL 574 100 Table 2. Species of solitary wasps sampled in “Fazenda Prata”, Paranaíba, state of Mato Grosso do Sul. Species Abundance Proportion (%) Alphamenes campanulatus (Fabricius) 6 11.3 Alphamenes insignis (Fox) 1 1.8 Alphamenes sp1 1 1.8 Alphamenes sp2 2 3.7 Ancistroceroides venustus (Brèthes) 4 7.5 Cyphomenes anisitsii (Brèthes) 3 5.6 Hypalastoroides brasiliensis (de Saussure) 2 3.7 Hypalastoroides nitidus Giordani Soika 2 3.7 Montezumia azurescens (Spinola) 1 1.8 Montezumia nigriceps (Spinola) 8 15.0 Montezumia petiolata Saussure 1 1.8 Pachodynerus brachygaster (Saussure) 7 13.2 Pachodynerus brevithorax (Saussure) 1 1.8 Pachodynerus guadulpensis (Saussure) 1 1.8 Pachodynerus reticulatus (Cameron) 1 1.8 Pachymenes laeviventris (Fox) 2 3.7 Parancistrocerus areatus (Fox) 1 1.8 Zeta argilaceum (Linnaeus) 3 5.6 Zethus hilarianus (Saussure) 3 5.6 Zethus miscogaster (Saussure) 2 3.7 ing to the genera Polybia, who was the most representative, Polistes and Mischocyttarus. This last, in this work, was very few sampled, with only five specimens (Table 1). Raw (1998b) and Henriques et al. (1992) studied colonies of so- cial wasps, while the first sampled 13 species within eight genera (Polybia was the most representative), the second found only seven colonies of four species. Until now, there were no studies of diversity of so- cial wasps in Mato Grosso do Sul state. A study on “ripar- ian forest” (Pereira & Antonielli-Junior, 2011) sampled 18 species belonging to six genera, with Polybia as the most representative, but Agelaia pallipes had almost half of the total abundance. In addition to the list of species from Pereira and Antonielli-Junior (2011) and Pereira-Bomfim and Antonielli-Junior (2012), we present here new records of species from Mato Grosso do Sul state: Apoica pallens, Brachygastra lecheguana, B. moebiana, Mischocyttarus frontalis, M. latior, M. cerberus, M. mattogrossoensis and Polistes canadensis. Eumeninae This work presents the first records for Eumeninae species in Mato Grosso do Sul. We collected 53 specimens of solitary wasps belonging to 21 species within 10 gen- YC Grandinete, FB Noll - Social and Solitary Wasps from Cerrado104 Table 4. Abundance and proportion of solitary wasps collected by using different sampling methods. Species A.S. Act. A.T. Tot. Alphamenes campanulatus (Fabricius) 3 3 0 6 Alphamenes insignis (Fox) 1 0 0 1 Alphamenes sp1 1 0 0 1 Alphamenes sp2 2 0 0 2 Ancistroceroides venustus (Brèthes) 2 2 0 4 Cyphomenes anisitsii (Brèthes) 2 1 1 4 Hypalastoroides brasiliensis (de Saussure) 1 1 0 2 Hypalastoroides nitidus Giordani Soika 1 1 0 2 Montezumia azurescens (Spinola) 1 0 0 1 Montezumia nigriceps (Spinola) 2 6 0 8 Montezumia petiolata Saussure 0 0 1 1 Pachodynerus brachygaster (Saussure) 1 6 0 7 Pachodynerus brevithorax (Saussure) 1 0 0 1 Pachodynerus guadulpensis (Saussure) 0 1 0 1 Pachodynerus reticulatus (Cameron) 0 1 0 1 Pachymenes laeviventris (Fox) 0 2 0 2 Parancistrocerus areatus (Fox) 0 1 0 1 Zeta argilaceum (Linnaeus) 1 2 0 3 Zethus hilarianus (Saussure) 3 0 0 3 Zethus miscogaster (Saussure) 1 1 0 2 Zethus romandinus (Saussure) 1 0 0 1 Total 24 28 2 54 Proportion 44.44% 51.86% 3.7% 100% and degradation, which promotes population reduction, lo- cal extinctions and consequently biodiversity loss (Primack, 2002). Besides the Cerrado, Mato Grosso do Sul has areas that consist of different physiognomies, like Pantanal and Chaco, with marsh, seasonal forests and paths, constituting a mosaic ecosystem (Spichiger et al., 2004; Morrone, 2006; Uetanabaro et al., 2007). Despite the biogeographic impor- tance of the state, there are still few studies concerning the local fauna, mainly invertebrates diversity, ecology, behav- ior and phylogenetic relationships. Comparison of methodologies According to table 3, the “attractive traps” sampled 76.31% of the total abundance collected (438 wasps), six genera and 13 species of polistinae wasps. Active search had 9.23% (53), seven genera and 11 species, while attractive attractive solution had 14.46% (83), six genera and 15 spe- cies. Even this last methodology did not collected the most abundance of wasps, it sampled the greatest richness, cor- roborating with Gomes and Noll (2009) and Noll and Gomes Table 3. Abundance and proportion of social wasps collected by using different sampling methods. Species A.S. Act. A.T. Tot. Agelaia pallipes (Olivier) 28 3 214 245 Apoica flavissima Van der Vetch 0 0 2 2 Brachygastra augusti (de Saussure) 1 0 0 1 Brachygastra lecheguana (Latreille) 4 0 1 5 Brachygastra moebiana (de Saussure) 0 1 0 1 Mischocyttarus frontalis (Fox) 1 0 0 1 Mischocyttarus latior (Fox) 1 0 0 1 Mischocyttarus cerberus Ducke 1 1 0 2 Mischocyttarus mattogrossoensis Zikán 1 0 0 1 Parachartergus smithii (de Saussure) 3 1 0 4 Polistes canadensis (Linnaeus) 0 0 7 7 Polistes billardieri Fabricius 2 9 1 12 Polistes subsericeus de Saussure 0 1 4 5 Polistes versicolor (Olivier) 0 1 15 16 Polybia ignobilis (Haliday) 4 5 49 58 Polybia jurinei (de Saussure) 2 0 6 8 Polybia liliacea (Fabricius) 0 0 5 5 Polybia occidentalis (Olivier) 13 3 60 76 Polybia paulista (Von Ihering) 1 0 0 1 Polybia ruficeps (Richards) 1 0 0 1 Polybia sericea (Olivier) 20 27 71 118 Synoeca surinama (Linnaeus) 0 1 3 4 Total 83 53 438 574 Proportion 14.46% 9.23% 76.31% 100% (2009), which showed that this method is very effective on capture social wasps. The table 4 show the efficiency of the sampling methods on solitary wasps. The attractive solution and active search were the most effective methods, with 24 wasps (44.44%), 16 species within 9 genera and 28 wasps (51.86%), 13 species within 10 genera, respectively. The attractive traps sampled only two species of two different genera, with 3.7% of the total abundance. The first work that collected Eumeninae using the attractive solution method was Noll and Gomes (2009), which collected 61 wasps, be- ing the third group more representative (Polistinae and Ich- neumonidae were first and second). As they, this work shows that this method is very effective not only for social wasps, but for solitary too, even on different ecosystems. Acknowledgments We wish to thank Marcel Gustavo Hermes for the iden- tification of solitary wasps and Getulio Minoru Tanaka Junior, Paulo Vittor Parecis Silva and Patricia Pereira do Nascimen- to for the assistance during collection. The work was funded by grants from “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)” (grant# 303249/2010-2). A.S. = Attractive Solution Act. = Active A.T. = Attractive Traps Tot. = Total A.S. = Attractive Solution Act. = Active A.T. = Attractive Traps Tot. = Total Sociobiology 60(1): 101-106 (2013) 105 References Alonso, L. E. & Agosti, D. (2000). Biodiversity studies, monitoring, and ants: an overview. In D. Agosti, J. D. Alon- so, L. E. Schultz & T. R. Washington (Eds.), Ants – Standart Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity (pp. 1-8). London: Smithsonian Institution Press. Assis, J. M. F. & Camillo, E. (1997). Diversidade, Sazon- alidade e Aspectos Biológicos de Vespas Solitárias (Hy- menoptera: Sphecidae: Vespidae) em Ninhos Armadilhas na Região de Ituiutaba, MG. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil, 26(2): 335-347. Camillo, E., Garófalo, J. C.,Serrano, J. C. & Muccillo, G. (1995). Diversidade e Abundância Sazonal de abelhas e ves- pas solitárias em ninhos armadilhas (Hymenoptera: Apocrita: Aculeata). Rev. Bras. Entomol., 39(2): 459-470. Carpenter, J. M. (1982). The phylogenetic relationships and natural classification of the Vespoidea (Hymenoptera). Syst. Entomol., 7: 11-38. Carpenter, J. M. (2004). Sinonymy of the Genus Marim- bonda Richards, 1978, with Leipomeles Möbius, 1856 (Hy- menoptera: Vespidae; Polistinae), and a New Key to the Genera of Paper Wasps of the New World. Am. Mus. Novit., 3465: 1-16. Carpenter, J. M. & Marques, O. M. (2001). Contribuição ao Estudo de Vespídeos do Brasil (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Ve- spoidea, Vespidae). [CD – ROM - Série Publicações Digitais, 2]. Cowan, D. P. (1991). The solitary and presocial Vespidae. In K. G. Ross & R. W. Matthews (Eds.), The Social Biology of Wasps (pp. 33-73). Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press. Elpino-Campos, A., Del-Claro, K. & Prezoto, F. (2007). Diversity of Social Wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Cer- rado fragments of Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 56(5): 685-692. Evans, H. E. (1966). The behavior patterns of solitary wasps. An. Rev. Entomol, 11:123-154. Hermes, M. G. & Köhler, A. (2004). The flower-visiting so- cial wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae) in two areas of Rio Grande do Sul state, southern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ento- mol., 50: 268-274. Jacques, G. C., Castro, A. A., Souza, G. K., Silva-Filho, R., Souza, M. M. & Zanuncio, J. C. (2012). Diversity of Social Wasps in the Campus of the “Universidade Federal de Viçosa” in Viçosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Sociobiology, 59: 1-10. Kaspari, M. (2000). A primer on ant ecology. In D. Agosti; J. D. Alonso; L. E. Schultz & T. R. Washington (Eds.). Ants – Standart Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiver- sity. London: Smithsonian Institution Press. Kears, C. A., Inouye, D. W. & Waser, N. M. (1998). Endan- gered mutualism: The conservation of plant-pollinator inter- actions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29: 83-112. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2010). Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento e das Queimadas no Cerrado. Serviço Público Federal, 173pp. Morato, E. F. (2001). Efeitos da fragmentação florestal sobre vespas e abelhas solitárias na Amazônia Central. II. Estratifi- cação vertical. Rev. Bras. Zool., 18: 737-747. Noll, F. B. & Gomes, B. (2009). An Improved Bait Method for Collecting Hymenoptera, especially Social Wasps (Vespi- dae: Polistinae). Ecology, Behav. Bionom., 38(4): 477-481. Oliveira, P. S. & Marquis, R. J. (2002). The cerrados of Bra- zil: Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. New York, Columbia University Press. Pereira, M. G. C. & Antonialli-Junior, W. F. (2011). Social Wasps in Riparian Forest in Bataiporã, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Sociobiology, 57: 153-163. Pereira Bomfim, M. G. C. & Antonialli-Junior, W. F. (2012). Community Structure of Social Wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespi- dae) in Riparian Forest in Bataiporã, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Sociobiology, 59: 755-765. Pickett, K. M. & Carpenter, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous Anal- isys and the Origin of Eusociality in the Vespidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Arthropod Syst. Phylog., 68(1): 3-33. Primack, R. B. (2002). Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, Sinauer. Richards, O. W. (1978). The social wasps of the Americas. London, British Museum (Natural History). Santos, G. M. M., Bichara Filho, C. C., Resende, J. J., Cruz J.D. da & Marques, O. M. (2007). Diversity and Community Structure of Social Wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Three Ecosystems in Itaparica Island, Bahia State, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 36(2):180-185. Silva-Pereira, V. & Santos, G. M. M. (2006). Diversity in Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and Social Wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae, Polistinae) Community in “Campos Rupestres”, Bahia, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 35: 165-174. Silveira, O. T. (2002). Surveying Neotropical Social Wasps. An Evaluation of Methods in the “Ferreira Penna” Research Station (ECFPn), in Caxiuanã, PA, Brazil (Hym., Vespidae, Polistinae). Pap. Avuls. Zool., 42(12): 299-323. Silveira, O. T., Costa Neto, S. V. & Silveira, O. F. M. (2008). Social Wasps of two wetlands ecosystems in brazilian Ama- zonia (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae). Acta Amazon., 38(2): 333-344. Souza, A. R., Venâncio, D. F. A., Zanuncio, J. C. & Prezoto, F. (2011). Sampling Methods for Assessing Social Wasps Species Diversity in a Eucalyptus Plantation. J. Econ. Ento- YC Grandinete, FB Noll - Social and Solitary Wasps from Cerrado106 mol., 104(3): 1120-1123. Souza, M. M. & Prezoto, F. (2006). Diversity of social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in Semideciduous Forest and Cer- rado (Savanna) regions in Brazil. Sociobiology, 49: 135-147. Van Mele, P. & Cuc, N. T. T. (2000). Evolution and status of Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) as a pest control agent in citrus in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Int. J. Pest Manag.,46, 295-301. Wenzel, J. (1998). A Generic Key to the Nests of Hornets, Yellowjackets, and Paper Wasps Worldwide (Vespidae: Vespinae, Polistinae). Am. Mus. Novit., 3224, 39pp. Zucchi, R., Sakagami, S. F., Noll, F. B., Mechi, M. R., Ma- teus, S., Baio, M. V. & Shima, S. N. (1995). Agelaia vicina, a swarm-founding polistine with the largest size among wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc., 103(2):129-137.