1315 Eggs of a Eusial Aphid’s Predator are Protected Against Attacks by Aphid Soldiers by Mitsuru Hattori1* & Takao Itino2,3 ABSTRACT Predators generally have traits that enable them to efficiently capture their prey and thus improve their survival. Natural selection should also favor traits of predators that improve the survival rate of their eggs, which are immobile and incapable of active resistance. We hypothesized that eggs of Atkinsonia ignipicta, a specialist predator of the eusocial aphid Ceratovacuna japonica, exhibit a defensive trait against aphid soldiers. We found that the hatchabil- ity of A. ignipicta eggs did not differ significantly between the experimental treatments with and without soldiers, which suggests that the eggs have a defensive trait that protects them from soldier aphids. Moreover, although the soldiers occasionally exhibited attack behavior when they encountered an egg, they did not continue the attack. We have observed a similar inter- ruption of attack behavior by soldiers that attacked their aphid siblings by mistake, suggesting that the eggs may chemically mimic the soldiers' siblings. This study thus provides evidence for adaptation in a specialist predator of a eusocial aphid. Key words: antagonistic adaptation, Atkinsonia ignipicta, Ceratovacuna japonica, eusocial aphid, predation, predator–prey interaction INTRODUCTION Interspecific interaction is one of the most important driving forces of organismal evolution (Ehrlich & Raven 1964; Vermeij 1994; Philipp et al. 1Department of Mountain and Environmental Science, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Technolog y, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan 2Department of Biolog y, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan 3Institute of Mountain Science, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan *Corresponding author: mtr.hattori@gmail.com 1316 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 2006). The interspecific interaction between predator and prey is antagonistic (Slobodkin 1980; Kishida et al. 2006), and numerous studies have investi- gated adaptation in interacting predators and prey. Many have focused on the defensive traits of prey species (Lively 1986; Dodson 1989; Petersson & Brönmark 1997; Agrawal 1998; Kishida & Nishimura 2004; Toju & Sota 2006; for a review see Tollrian & Harvell 1999), and others have examined how the attack traits of a predator enable it to efficiently capture its prey and thus improve its survival (Abrams 2000; Michimae & Wakahara 2002; Toju & Sota 2006). Investigations of reciprocal adaptation between prey and predator can not only deepen our understanding of adaptive evolution but also of the evolution of biodiversity (Thompson 2005). The moth larva Atkinsonia ignipicta (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Stathmopo- didae) is a specialist predator of the eusocial aphid Ceratovacuna japonica (Takahashi) (Homoptera: Hormaphidinae) (Morimoto & Shibao 1993). Individuals of the defensive caste of C. japonica, the soldiers, have long horns and forelegs that they use to protect the aphid colony against predators (M. Hattori & Itino 2008). When the soldiers encounter a predator, they grasp it with their forelegs and then pierce it with their frontal horns, sometimes killing it (Hattori et al. in prep). Females of A. ignipicta lay eggs directly in aphid colonies (Fig. 1; Hattori personal observation). Therefore, the fitness of eggs of A. ignipicta without any defensive trait against aphid soldiers would be decreased when soldier aphids were present. In fact, soldiers of Pseudoregma bambucicola (Takahashi) (Homoptera: Hormaphididae) (Ohara 1985) and Ceratovacuna lanigera (Zehntner) (Homoptera: Hormaphidinae) (Aoki et al. 1984) attack and crush the eggs of their generalist predators that are laid on or near their colonies. These observations suggest that natural selection might favor traits that improve the survival rate of the eggs, which are immobile and incapable of active resistance. Indeed, some predators display an oviposition behavior that improves the survival rate of their eggs (Ohara 1985; Arakaki 1992). Thus, we hypothesized that A. ignipicta eggs, which are laid directly in the center of a C. japonica colony, might have a defensive trait that protects them against the soldier aphids. Therefore, we examined whether the hatchability of A. ignipicta eggs is influenced by the presence of soldiers. 1317 Hattori , M.& T. Itino— Eggs of a Eusial Aphid’s Predator MATERIALS & METHODS Atkinsonia ignipicta The specialist predator of C. japonica, A. ignipicta, is widely distributed in Japan from Kyushu to Hokkaido (Moriuti 1982). Adults of A. ignipicta are abundant during June and July, when they lay their yellow, barrel-shaped eggs in aphid colonies (Fig. 1). Immediately after they hatch out, A. ignipicta larvae attempt to prey on nearby aphids. If they are successful, they then spin silken nests in the aphid colony, where they cannot be attacked by the soldier aphids, occasionally coming out to prey on the aphids. Ceratovacuna japonica The eusocial aphid C. japonica, which is widely distributed in Japan (M. Hattori personal observation), has a heteroecious (i.e., host alternating ) and cyclically parthenogenetic (i.e., an asexual phase and a sexual phase) life history. It has one primary host, Styrax japonica (Sieb. et Zucc.) (Ebenales, Styracaceae), and several secondary hosts (in central Japan, Poaseae species, e.g., Sasa senanensis [Rehd.] [Poales, Poaceae]) (Aoki & Kurosu 1991, 2011). Although this species has a complete life cycle and on its secondary hosts, it sometimes produces winged sexuparae, it has merely been observed on its primary host (Carlin et al. 1994). Here, we define a colony as an aggregation of aphid individuals on a single leaf of the secondary host S. senanensis. Such a colony can persist for up to several months. Each colony has three morpho- logically distinctive castes: young reproductive adult females, which produce nymphs or soldiers parthenogenetically; and sterile soldiers. Soldiers are first Fig. 1. Photograph of the eggs of the predatory month A. ignipicta laid on a S. senanensis leaf (among the spiny trichomes) in the center of a colony of the eusocial aphid C. japonica. 1318 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 instar nymphs, and they do not develop into second instar nymphs (Aoki et al. 1981). Soldiers have longer horns and forelegs than non-soldier aphids of the same instar (Hattori & Itino 2008), and they protect their colony from predators (Hattori et al. in review). The primary predators of C. japonica are larvae of Taraka hamada (Druce) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and of A. ignipicta, which prey exclusively on C. japonica (Morimoto & Shibao 1993). Although other potential predators such as Syrphidae and Chrysopidae species are able to prey on C. japonica, they are seldom seen on C. japonica colony (Hattori personal observation). The hatchability of A. ignipicta eggs in the presence of soldiers To test whether A. ignipicta eggs have any defensive trait that protects them against soldiers of C. japonica, we compared hatching rates of eggs placed in dishes with and without soldier aphids. We designed three treatments, each with different numbers of non-soldier and soldier aphids (Fig. 2) We haphazardly collected A. ignipicta eggs (n = 50) and 30 aphid colonies from a wild aphid population on Mt. Nabekanmuri, Nagano, central Japan (36°16’56”N, 137°49’35”E) in July 2009. This aphid population inhabits the edges of a deciduous forest, where the secondary host plant S. senanensis is abundant. After collecting the eggs, we returned to the laboratory and immediately introduced the eggs and aphids into petri dishes, mixing the aphid individuals from the 30 aphid colonies. In the course of these manipulations, we observed Fig. 2. The design of the egg hatching experiment. Each petri dish was 3.5 cm in diameter. In treatments 1 and 2, the number of non-soldier first instar aphid nymphs was equal. In treatments 2 and 3, the total number of aphids (non-soldier first instar nymphs plus soldiers) was equal. 1319 Hattori , M.& T. Itino— Eggs of a Eusial Aphid’s Predator no confounding events such as soldiers attacking conspecifics. We observed the eggs at 24-h intervals for 1 week or until they hatched. Also, every 24-h, we removed all aphid individuals from the petri dishes and introduced newly collected aphid individuals from the same population to the petri dishes according to treatment (Fig. 2). Statistical analysis We compared the hatching rate of the eggs among the treatments by using Fisher’s exact test ( JMP v. 9.0.0 statistical package, SAS Institute). RESULTS In every treatment, the hatching rate was high (Table 1), and hatch- ability was not significantly different among treatments (df = 2, χ2 = 0.26, P > 0.05). Some eggs that did not hatch gradually turned black, and two individuals of a parasitic wasp, Trichogramma sp., emerged from each of these eggs. Other eggs gradually became moldy and distorted in shape (Table 1). When the soldiers encountered an egg, they rarely showed attack behavior toward it. Those that initially showed attack behavior did not continue in their attack, but immediately stopped displaying the behavior. Table 1: Numbers of hatched and dead A. ignipicta eggs among the three treatments. 1320 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 DISCUSSION The high hatching rate of the A. ignipicta eggs in the treatment with sol- dier aphids suggests that A. ignipicta has some defensive trait that protects it against soldiers of C. japonica. This result contrasts markedly with the findings of previous studies that soldiers of other social aphid species often crush the eggs of generalist predators (P. bambucicola, Ohara 1985; C. lanigera, Aoki et al. 1984). At present, we do not know whether C. japonica soldiers crush the eggs of their generalist predators. Future studies should investigate this possibility. Although we occasionally observed attack behavior of soldiers toward eggs of A. ignipicta, the soldiers did not persist but immediately stopped attacking the eggs. One of us has observed a similar interruption of attack behavior by soldiers that attacked one of their siblings by mistake (M. Hattori personal observation). These observations suggest that the eggs of A. ignipicta may chemically mimic the aphid. For example, the cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) of the eggs may be similar to those of the aphids, just as myrmecophilous insects produce CHCs that mimic those of ants so that they can penetrate the ant colony (Vander Meer et al. 1989; Akino et al. 1999; Hojo et al. 2009). Moreover, a similar chemical mimicry has been observed in predators of ant-tending aphids (Lohman et al. 2006). A future study should compare the CHCs of A. ignipicta with those of C. japonica nymphs. Most studies of predator–prey interaction in social aphids have focused on the morpholog y and function of the soldier’s defensive traits (Kutsukake et al. 2004; Hattori & Itino 2008; Hattori et al. in review). In contrast, even though it has been suspected that predators of eusocial aphids have various anti-soldier traits (Arakaki & Yoshiyasu 1988; Aoki & Kurosu 1992; for a review see Stern & Foster 1996), whether a predator’s defensive traits can protect it from soldiers has not been investigated quantitatively. Further study of the defensive traits of predators will deepen our understanding of not only reciprocal adaptation in predator–prey interactions but also of the evolutionary stability of eusociality in aphids. 1321 Hattori , M.& T. Itino— Eggs of a Eusial Aphid’s Predator ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Dr. Osamu Kishida (hokkaido Universsity) for helpful chemical advice. This work was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to M. H. (no. 216649) and T. I. (no. 22570015). REFERENCES Abrams, P.A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecolog y and Systematics 31: 79-105. Agrawal, A.A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279: 1201-1202. Akino, T., J.J. Knapp, J.A. Thomas & G.W. Elmes 1999. Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266: 1419-1426. Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 1991. Discovery of the gall generation Ceratovacuna japonica (Homoptera: Aphidoidea). Journal of Etholog y 3: 83-87. Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 1992. No attack on conspecifics by soldiers of the gall aphid Ceratoglyphina bambusae (Homoptera) late in the season. Japanese Journal of Entomolog y 60: 707- 713. Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 2011. A review of the biolog y of Cerataphidini (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Hormaphidinae), focusing mainly on their life cycles, gall formation, and soldiers. Psyche doi:10.1155/2010/380351 Aoki, S., S. Akimoto & S. Yamane 1981. Observations on Pseudoregma alexanderi (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), an aphid species producing pseudoscorpion-like soldiers on bamboo. Kontyû 49: 355-366. Aoki, S., U. Kurosu & S. Usuba 1984. First instar larvae of the sugar-cane wooly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), attack its predator. Kontyû 52: 497-503. Arakaki, N. 1992. Predators of the sugar cane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Okinawa and predator avoidance of defensive attack by the aphid. Applied Entomolog y and Zoolog y 21: 159-161. Arakaki, N. & Y. Yoshiyasu 1988. Notes on biolog y, taxonomy and distribution of the aphidophagous pyralid, Dipha aphidivora (Meyrick) comb. nov. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Applied Entomolog y and Zoolog y 23: 234-244. Carlin, N.F., D.S. Gladstein, A.J. Berry & N.E. Pierce 1994. Absence of kin discrimination behavior in a soldier-producing aphid, Ceratovacuna japonica (Hemiptera: Pemphigidae; Cerataphidini). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 102: 287-298. Dodson, S. 1989. Predator-induced reaction norms. Bio Science 39:447-452. Ehrlich, P.R. & P.H. Raven 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608. 1322 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 Hattori, M. & T. Itino 2008. Soldiers’ armature changes seasonally and locally in an eusocial aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Sociobiolog y. 52: 429-436. Hojo, M.K., A. Wada-Katsumata, T. Akino, S. Yamaguchi, M. Ozaki & R. Yamaoka 2009. Chemical disguise as particular caste of host ants in the ant inquiline parasite Niphanda fusca (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Proceeding of the Royal Society B 276: 551-558. Kishida, O. & K. Nishimura 2004. Bulg y tadpoles: inducible defense morph. Oecologia 140:414-421. Kishida, O., M. Yuuki & K. Nishimura 2006. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator- prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecolog y 87: 1599-1604. Kutsukake, M., H. Shibao, N. Nikoh, M. Morioka, T. Tamura, T. Hoshino, S. Ohgiya & T. Fukatsu 2004. Venomous protease of aphid soldier for colony defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 11338-11343. Lively, C.M. 1986. Competition, comparative life histories, and maintenance of shell dimorphism in a barnacle. Ecolog y 67:858-864. Lohman, D.J., Q. Liao & N.E. Pierce 2006. Convergence of chemical mimicry in a guild of aphid predators. Ecological Entomolog y 31: 41-51. Michimae, H. & M. Wakahara 2002. A tadpole-induced polymorphism in the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Evolution 56: 2029-2038. Morimoto, M. & H. Shibao 1993. Predators of the bamboo aphid Pseudoregma bambucicola (Homoptera: Pemphigidae) in Kagoshima, southern Japan. Japanese Society of Applied Entomolog y and Zoolog y 28: 246-248. Moriuti, S. 1982. Xyloryctidae. Pp. 258 in Moths of Japan, Vol.1. Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan. Ohara, K. 1985. Observations on the prey–predator relationship between Pseudoregma bambucicola (Homoptera, Pemphigidae) and Metasyrphus confrater (Diptera, Syrphidae), with special reference to the behavior of the aphid soldiers. Esakia 23: 107-110. Pettersson, L.B. & C. Brönmark 1997. Density-dependent costs of an inducible morphological defense in crucian carp. Ecolog y 78:1805-1815. Philipp, M., J. Böcher, H.R. Siegismund & L.R. Nielson 2006. Structure of a plant-pollinator network on a pahoehoe lava desert the Galápagos Islands. Ecography 29: 531-540. Slobodkin, L.B. 1980. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Dover, NY, USA. Stern, D.L. & W.A. Foster 1996. The evolution of soldiers in aphids. Biological Review 71: 27-79. Thompson, J.M. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Toju, H. & T. Sota 2006. Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. American Naturalist 167:105-117. Tollrian, R. & C.D. Harvell 1999. The ecolog y and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Vander Meer, R.K., D. Saliwanchik & B. Lavine 1989. Temporal changes in colony cuticular hydrocarbon patterns of Solenopsis invicta: implications for nestmate recognition. Journal of Chemical Ecolog y 15: 2115-2125. Vermeij, G.J. 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species: selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecolog y and Systematics 25: 219-236. T