1483 Plants Used by Bees as Pollen Sources in the Brazilian “Cerrado” by Daniela de Almeida-Anacleto1; Luís Carlos Marchini1*; Augusta Carolina de Camargo; Carmello Moreti2 & Vinicius Castro Souza3 ABSTRACT Bee flora is the set of plants that supply food to bees in a given region. The recognition of the plants used by bees for the collection of pollen in order to enable adequate handling by the beekeeper and the improvement of the bee pasture are considered of great importance for a good beekeeping. Some bee pollen samples were obtained monthly during one year from pollen collectors installed in five beehives in two different areas (“cerradão” and “cerrado” sensu stricto) in Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. It was noted that species of the Aster- aceae family were intensely visited by the Apis mellifera bees, indicating the importance of them for an eventual bee flora recomposition. Alternativelly bees visited nearby areas, using mainly Eucalyptus sp. and Citrus sp. for the collection of pollen. Key words: Apis mellifera, food, protein, bee plant INTRODUCTION Bee pollen is the result of the agglutination of flower pollen made by bees by means of the addition of salivary substances and small quantities of nectar or honey (Brasil 2001). Pollen besides being important for the nutrition of bees due to its physi- cochemical composition (Funari et al. 2003; Barreto et al. 2005; Marchini et al. 2006). Their quality and composition can change adult bee behavior, their fecundity, life span, brood area size, honey stock, colony population and food larval quality (Toth et al. 2005; Human et al. 2007, Matttila & Otis 2007) . 1Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, ESALQ/USP, Av. Pádua Dias, 11- Caixa Postal 09, CEP 13418-190, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 2Instituto de Zootecnia/APTA/SAA, Nova Odessa, SP, Brazil 3Laboratório de Sistemática Vegetal, ESALQ/USP- Piracicaba, SP, Brazil Corresponding author: lcmarchi@usp.br. Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, ESALQ/USP, Av. Pádua Dias, 11- Caixa Postal 09, CEP 13418-190, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 1484 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 Beekeepers can harvest part of the pollen collected by the worker bees, and for that they use collectors, traps or pollen hunters which withdraw their pollen loads in a pollen basket before the bees penetrate the beehive (Barreto et al. 2005). Bee pollen can be used as food complement by humans and animals. The nutritional importance of the pollen for humans is recognized, as being a protein source of high biological value, also containing carbohydrates, lipids and minerals in its composition. Pollen does not only contain antioxidant vitamins (A, C and E), but also those of the complex B and vitamin D (Oliveira et al. 2009, Melo & Almeida-Muradian 2010; Lopes et al. 2011). The botanical origin of the pollen is of extreme importance for the definition of its physicochemical composition, and it is necessary to know the pollen spectrum of the collected product in order to establish the relation between the pollen composition, its physical characteristics and its botanical origin. According to Modro et al. (2007) the nutritional components are correlated to the frequency of the specific pollen types and indicate the importance of the collection from several pollen sources for the maintenance of the richest and balanced diets. The objective of the present study was to identify the pollen sources used by the bees, aiming at a more appropriate handling of the local “cerrado” bee vegetation and to provide to beekeepers alternative botanical species for the recomposition of the bee flora. MATERIAL AND METHODS This research was carried out in remaining “cerrado” areas of the Campus of the University of São Paulo, Pirassununga County, State of São Paulo, Brazil, located within the coordinates 21o 57 ’ 02 ” S, 47o 27 ’ 50 ” W and 630 m above sea level. The total area of the Campus contains around 2.300 ha, occupied by different faces of the “cerrado” ecosystem, also known as “savannah”, located besides areas of cultivation and pastures. The preserved forests (“cerrado” sensu stricto, “cerradão” and riparian forest) correspond to 30 % of the total area (about 705 ha), while the pastures and cropland areas make up approximately 70 % of the total area (1.620 ha). Two different areas were evaluated: 1- “cerradão” with approximately 56 ha, 1485 Almeida-Anacleto, D. de — Plants Used by Bees being a secondary forest, where the anthropic action has been controlled over more than 20 years, without fire incidence during this period. In this area the soil is classified as a Dark-Red Latosol (Pirassununga-Plio-Pleistocene Formation), textures varying from clayey to sandy-clay, with the canopy of the vegetation reaching heights of 15 to 20 m; 2- “cerrado” sensu stricto, characterized by a shrubby flora, with at most 6m height, including lianas and several herbaceous species. This fragment has around 93 ha and the soil is a Red-Yellow Latosol with textures varying from clayey-sandy to sandy. Fina & Monteiro (2009) observed a quite varied floristic composition in the same “cerradão” area with 730 individuals distributed among 33 families, 60 genera and 80 species. The richest families are Myrtaceae, Lau- raceae and Euphorbiaceae; and the most important species are Copaifera langsdorfi, Anadenanthera falcata and Siparuna guianensis and, according to the literature, several of these plants are sources of nectar and pollen for different bee species. A total of 5 swarms (in each area) of Apis mellifera were collected, transferred to Langstroth beehives, and maintained in the same place of origin. During one year, pollen collections were performed at the entrance of the beehives; collectors of pollen were set, monthly, at the entry of the hives. Pollen samples were homogenized and 1 g of each was taken for preparation of slides. For slide preparation (3 replicates per sample), the Acetolysis method (Erdtman 1952) was adopted, which consists of the chemical treatment of pollen grains, removing their intine, cytoplasm and adhering substances, fos- silizing them artificially in order to make the exine most transparent and more appropriate for the study of pollen details. The identification of the pollen types was made based on referential slides made with the pollen of the plants collected in the areas and also in slides already existent in the laboratory of the Apiculture Sector of the ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, in which the work was carried out. Qualitative analysis – through this analysis the botanical species were determined (or pollen types), considering morphological aspects of the grains comparing them with referential slides. Quantitative analysis – was performed by means of counting 300 to 500 grains of pollen per sample and grouping them by botanical species and/ or pollen types. The pollen types were grouped in four classes of frequency. In 1486 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 other words, dominant pollen (> 45%) (DP), accessory pollen (15 to 45%) (AP), isolated important pollen (3 to 15%) (IIP) and isolated occasional pollen (< 3%) (IOP) (Louveaux et al. 1978). With the data of pollen types from the “cerradão” and “cerrado” sensu stricto), the Similarity Index (SI) of Sorensen was calculated according to Silveira Neto et al. (1976), by the expression: SI = 2j/(a+b), where: j= number of collected pollen types common to both: “cerradão” and “cerrado” sensu stricto. a = number of collected pollen types observed in the samples from the “cerradão” b = number of collected pollen types observed in the samples from the “cerrado” sensu stricto. SI varies from 0 to 1, the closer to 1, more similar are the communities and the closer to 0, less similar they are. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION With the quantitative analyses of the samples of the pollen loads it was possible to demonstrate the importance of the plant species in the pro- duction of honey, classifying them in the above mentioned frequency classes DP, AP, IIP, and IOP (Tables 1 and 2). The following types of DP (Figure 1) were observed: Baccharis sp. (Aster- aceae), Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae), Brachiaria sp. (Poaceae) and Asteraceae type only in the “cerradão”; Alternanthera ficoides (Amaranthaceae), Eucalyptus sp. (Myrtaceae) and Vernonia polyanthes (Asteraceae) only in the “cerrado” sensu stricto, and Eupatorium sp. (Asteraceae), Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae), Mikania sp. (Asteraceae) and Citrus sp. (Rutaceae) in both areas. It was also noted that bees visited nearby areas with Eucalyptus sp. and Citrus sp. for pollen collection. The most frequent plant species evaluated through the pollen from the collectors installed in the beehives of the “cerradão” were: Mikania sp., which bloomed during four months of the collections; and Citrus sp.1 and Didymopanax vinosum, for three months. For the “cerrado” sensu stricto: Eupatorium sp. and Didymopanax vinosum, appeared during five months of the collections; Citrus sp.1, for four months and Mikania sp., Alternanthera ficoides and Wissadula subpetala, three months. 1487 Almeida-Anacleto, D. de — Plants Used by Bees Botanical specie or Pollen type Pollen spectrum/month Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun July Ago Sept Oct Nov Dec Amaranthaceae - Alternanthera ficoides - - - - AP - - - - - - - Araliaceae - Didymopanax vinosum - - DP IOP IIP - - - - - - - Arecaeae - Astrocaryum acule- atissimum - - - - - - - - - - - IOP Asteraceae - Baccharis dracun- culifolia - DP - - - - - - - - - - Asteraceae - Baccharis sp. DP - - - - - - - - - - - Asteraceae - Bidens gardnerii - - IIP - IIP - - - - - - - Asteraceae - Eupatorium sp. - - - - - DP - - - - - DP Asteraceae - Mikania sp. - - - AP - AP DP IOP - - - - Asteraceae - Vernonia cognata - - - - - - - IIP - - - - Coniferae - Pinus sp. - - - - - - - - - - - AP Euphorbiaceae- Alchornea sp - - - - - - - - - DP - - Euphorbiaceae - Croton flo- ribundus - - - - - - - - - - - AP E u p h o r b i a c e a e - C r o t o n urucurana AP Fabaceae-Caesalpinioidea - Cae- salpinia sp. - - - - - - IOP - - - - - Fabaceae-Mimosoidea - Pipta- denia moniliformis IOP - - - - - - - - - - - Lamiaceae - Hyptis eriophylla - - IIP - - - - - - - - - Malvaceae - Wissadula sub- petala - - - AP - - - - - - - - Myrtaceae - Eucalyptus sp1. - IIP - - - - - - - - - - Myrtaceae - Eugenia aurata - - - - - IOP - - - - - - Myrtaceae - Eugenia bimar- ginata - - - AP - - - - - - - - Piperaceae – Piper sp. - - - - - - - - - AP DP - Poaceae - Brachiaria sp. AP - - - DP - - - - - - - Rutaceae - Citrus sp1. IOP - - IOP - - - - DP - - - Solanaceae - Solanum sp. - AP - - - - - - - - - - Asteraceae type - - - - - - - DP AP - - - Brassicaceae type - - - - - - - IIP - - - - Poaceae type - - IOP - - - - - - - - - Rubiaceae type - - - IIP - - - - - - - - Rutaceae type - - - - - - - - - - IIP - DP = dominant pollen (> 45%), AP = accessory pollen (15 to 45%), IIP = isolated important pollen (3 to 15%) and IOP = isolated occasional pollen (< 3%). -No pollen or pollen type Table 1. Pollen spectrum of the pollen samples, originating from the collectors installed from the beehives of the "cerradão" area, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. 1488 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 Table 2 - Pollen spectrum of the pollen samples, originating from the collectors installed from the beehives of the “cerrado” sensu stricto area, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. Botanical specie or Pollen type Pollen spectrum/month Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun July Ago Sept Oct Nov Dec Amaranthaceae - Alternan- thera ficoides - - - AP DP AP - - - - - - Araliaceae - Didymopanax vinosum IOP IIP - AP IOP DP - - - - - - Are caeae - Astrocar yum aculeatissimum - - - - - - - - - IOP IOP - Asteraceae - Eupatorium sp. - DP DP - - IOP - - - - DP DP Asteraceae - Mikania hir- sutissima - - - - - - - - AP - - Asteraceae - Mikania sp. - - - DP AP - - IOP - - - - Asteraceae - Montanoa sp. - AP - - - - - - - - - - Asteraceae - Vernonia cog- nata - - - - - - - - AP - - - Asteraceae - Vernonia poly- anthes - - - - - - - DP - - - - Asteraceae - Vigueira sp. AP - - - - - - - - - - - Bombacaceae - Eriotheca gracilips - - - - IOP - - - - - - - Convolvulaceae - Merremia macrocalix - - - - - - - IIP - - - - Euphorbiaceae - Croton floribundus - - - - - - - - - IIP IIP - Euphorbiaceae - Croton urucurana AP - - - - - - - - - - - Fa b a c e a e -Mim o s o i d e a - Piptadenia moniliformis - - - - - - - - - IIP - - Malvaceae - Sida sp. - IIP - - - - - - - - - - Malvaceae - Wissadula sub- petala - - IIP - - - - IIP - IOP - - Myrtaceae - Eucalyptus sp1 - - - - - - DP - - AP - - Poaceae - Brachiaria sp. AP IIP - - - - - - - - - - Poaceae - Zea mays - - - - - - - - - - IIP - Rutaceae - Citrus sp1. IOP - - - - - IIP - DP - - IOP Sapindaceae - Serjania sp. - - - - - - - - - - - Solanaceae - Solanum sp. - - AP - - - - - - - - - Brassicaceae type - IIP - - - - - - - - - - Malvastrum type - - - - - - - - IIP - - - Myrcia type - - - - - - - - - - - AP DP = dominant pollen (> 45%), AP = accessory pollen (15 to 45%), IIP = isolated important pollen (3 to 15%) and IOP = isolated occasional pollen (< 3%). -No pollen or pollen type 1489 Almeida-Anacleto, D. de — Plants Used by Bees 1- A lte rn at he ra fi co id es (A m ar an th ac ea e) , 2 -B ac ch ar is sp ., 3 -B ac ch ar is dr ac un cu lif ol ia (A st er ac ea e) , 4 -B ra ch ia ri a sp . ( Po ac e- ae ), 5- Bi de ns g ar dn er ii (A st er ac ea e) , 6 -C itr us sp 1. ( R ut ac ea e) , 7 -C ro to n flo ri bu nd us , 8 -C ro to n ur uc ur an a (E up ho rb ia ce ae ), 9- D id ym op an ax vi no su m (A ra lia ce ae ), 10 -E uc al yp tu s s p1 . ( M yr ta ce ae ), 11 -E ug en ia bi m ar gi na ta (M yr ta ce ae ), 12 -E up at or iu m sp ( A st er ac ea e) , 1 3- M ik an ia s p. , 1 4- M ik an ia h ir su tis sim a (A st er ac ea e) , 1 5- M on ta no a sp . ( A st er ac ea e) , 1 6- A lch or ne a sp (E up ho rb ia ce ae ), 17 -S ol an um sp . ( So la na ce ae ), 18 -V er no ni a co gn at a, 1 9- Ve rn on ia p ol ya nt he s ( A st er ac ea e) , 2 0- V ig ue ir a sp . (A st er ac ea e) , 2 1- W iss ad ul a su bp et al a (M al va ce ae ) an d 22 - M yr ci a ty pe (M yr ta ce ae ). Fi g. 1 . P ol le n ty pe s w hi ch a pp ea re d as d om in an t o r ac ce ss or y po lle n in sa m pl es o f t he p ol le n lo ad s c ol le ct ed in a re a of “c er ra dã o” a nd “c er ra do ” se ns u str ic to o f P ir as su nu ng a, S P, B ra zi l. 1490 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 Comparing the two areas, 15 pollen types occurred in both: three belong- ing to the Asteraceae family, two to the Euphorbiaceae and one of each of the following families, Amaranthaceae, Araliaceae, Arecaceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae, Poaceae, Rutaceae and Solanaceae. The other 25 identified pollen types (Tables 1 and 2) were observed either in the “cerrado” sensu stricto or in the “cerradão”. The Similarity Index of Sorensen for the two areas was the same, IS = 0.545, which indicates that the collec- tion of pollen by bees has a medium similarity between the two forms of vegetation. For other bush areas, located in different Brazilian states, the similarity index was very low for plants visited by solitary bees and stingless bees (Moreti et al. 2006). In the distribution of the pollen types by family (Figure 2), it is noticed that the greatest diversity of species belongs to the Asteraceae family with 12 pollen types, followed by Myrtaceae with four. Costa (2002- unpublished data) investigating pollen sources used by worker bees of Apis mellifera in Cruz das Almas, BA, Brazil, also observed the Asteraceae as the family with the greatest number of pollen types and the same was observed by Almeida- Anacleto (2007) in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. In ten pollen samples of the south region of Brazil, Almeida-Muradian et al. (2005) observed that the most frequent families of plants were Arecaceae, Asteraceae and Myrtaceae, with two families of plants coincident with the observed ones in the present study. In “cerrado” areas of Cassilândia, MS, Brazil differently than in the here studied area, the Malpighiaceae and the Fabaceae (Mimosoideae) were the families with the greatest number of species of importance for the bees (Vieira et al. 2008). Through the analyses of the studied pollen samples, a great participation of isolated and occasional pollen types, was found in several samples. Barth (1970) mentions that these species have little importance, when considering the quantity of nectar and pollen supplied by the plant; however, when the interest is the origin and geographical provenance of the samples the presence of these pollen types becomes significant. CONCLUSION Species of the Asteraceae family are intensely visited by the Apis mellifera bees for pollen collection in the São Paulo state, both in the “cerrado” sensu 1491 Almeida-Anacleto, D. de — Plants Used by Bees stricto and in the “cerradão” areas, indicating that this family is very important for a recomposition of the bee flora. It was noted that besides the existing plants occurring in the “cerrado” sensu stricto and in the “cerradão” areas, the bees visited nearby areas where the beehives were installed, making use mainly of Eucalyptus sp. and Citrus sp., for pollen collection. ACKNOWLEDgMENTS The authors thank FAPESP for financial support Fig. 2. Number of pollen types by botanical family observed in the samples of pollen loads collected in beehives of Apis mellifera in the “cerrado” areas of Pirassununga, SP, Brazil 1492 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012 REFERENCES Almeida-Anacleto, D. 2007. Recursos alimentares, desenvolvimento das colônias e caracterísiticas físico químicas, microbiológicas e polínicas de mel.. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências)- Curso de Pós graduação em Ciências, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiróz”, Universidade de São Paulo. 133p. Almeida-Muradian, L.B., L.C. Pamplona, S. Coimbra & O.M. Barth 2005. Chemical Composition and Botanical Evaluation of dried Bee Pollen pellets. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 18(1): 105-111. Barreto, L.M.R.C., S.R.C. Funari & R .O. Orsi 2005. Composição e qualidade do pólen apícola proveniente de sete estados brasileiros e do Distrito Federal. Boletim de Indústria animal 62(2):167-175. Barth, O.M. 2004. Melissopalynolog y in Brazil: a review of pollen analysis of honeys, propolis and pollen loads of bees. Scientia Agricola 61(3):342-350. Brasil 2001. Instrução Normativa n.3 de 2001. Technical Regulation for fixation of identity and quality of bee pollen. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento. In Internet: http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis-consulta/servlet/VisualizarAnexo?id=2192. . Accessed Dec. 22, 2008. Erdtman, g. 1952. Pollen morfolog y and plant taxonomy. Agiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 539p. Fina, B.g. & R. Monteiro 2009. Phytossociological study of an area of savanna, Pirassununga (SP, southeastern Brazil ). Neotropical Biolog y and Conservation 4(1):40-48. In Internet: http://www.unisinos.br/publicacoes_cientificas/images/stories/ Publicacoes/neotropical/v4n1/40a48_neo4(1)_fina_monteiro.pdf. Accessed Apr. 03, 2012. Funari, S.R.C., H.C. Rocha, J.M. Sforcin, H.g. Filho, P.R. Curi, g. Dierckx & A.R.R.O. Funari 2003. Composições bromatológica e mineral do pólen coletado por abelhas africanizadas (Apis mellifera L.) em Botucatu, Estado de São Paulo. Archivos Latinoamericano de Producción animal 11(2):88-93. Human,H., S.W. Nicolson, K. Strauss, C.W. Pirk & V. Dietemann 2007. Influence of pollen quality on ovarian development in honeybee workers (Apis mellifera scutellata). Journal of Insect Physiolog y 53(7): 649-655. Lopes, J., O.g. Stanciu, M. g. R. Campos, N. Almaraz-Abarca, L. B. Almeida-Muradian & L.A. Marghitas 2011. Bee pollen antioxidant activity - a review: achievements and further challenges. Journal of Pharmacognosy 2(2): 25-38. Louveaux, J. , A. Maurizio & g. Vorwohl 1978. Methods of Melissopalinolog y. Bee World 59(4):139-157. Marchini, L.C., V.D.A. Reis & A.C.C.C. Moreti 2006. Composição físico-química de amostras de pólen coletado por abelhas africanizadas Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em Piracicaba, Estado de São Paulo. Ciência Rural 36(3):949-953. 1493 Almeida-Anacleto, D. de — Plants Used by Bees Matttila, H.R & g.W. Otis 2007. Dwindling pollen resources trigger the transition to broodless populations of long-lived honeybees each autumn. Ecological Entomolog y 32(5): 496-505. Melo, I. L. P. & L. B. Almeida-Muradian 2010. Stability of antioxidants vitamins in bee pollen samples. Química Nova 33(3): 514-518. Modro, A.F.H., D. Message, C.F.P. Luz & J.A. Meira Neto 2007. Composição e qualidade do pólen apícola coletado em Minas gerais. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42(8):1057- 1065. Moreti, A.C.C.C., D. Almeida-Anacleto, M. d’Ávila, g.H.C. Vieira & L.C. Marchini 2006. Abelhas visitantes em vegetação de diferentes áreas remanescentes de cerrado. Magistra 18(4):229-248. Oliveira, K.C.L.S., M. Moriya, R.A.B. Azedo, E.W. Teixeira, M.L.T.M.F. Alves, A.C.C.C. Moreti & L.B. Almeida-Muradian 2009. Relationship between botanical origin and antioxidants vitamins of bee-collected pollen. Química Nova 32(5):1099-1102 Silveira Neto, S., O. Nakano, D. Barbin & N.A. Villa Nova 1976. Manual de Ecologia dos Insetos. Piracicaba: Ceres, 419p. Toth, A.L., S. Kantarovich, A.F. Miesel & g.E. Robinson 2005. Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in boney bees. The Journal of Experimental Biolog y, 208(24): 4641-4649. Vieira, g.H.C., L.C. Marchini, B.A. Souza & A.C.C.C. Moreti 2008. Fontes florais usadas por abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) em área de cerrado no município de Cassilândia, Mato grosso do Sul, Brasil. Ciência & Agrotecnologia 32(5):1454-1460.