Open access journal: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology ISSN: 0361-6525 DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v68i1.6030Sociobiology 68(1): e-6030 (March, 2021) Introduction Foraging requires appropriate decisions related to the time spent in exploration and choosing the appropriate time to maximize net amount of energy gained, foraging efficiency, and survival, or to minimize the risk of starvation (Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Ydenberg, 2007). These decisions are subject to constraints that limit viable alternatives, such as time spent and the energy cost of the activity (Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Perry & Pianka, 1997; Ydenberg, 2007). Decisions may be related Abstract Dinoponera lucida is a poneromorph ant endemic to the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. The species is classified as endangered in Brazil’s Red List due to its peculiar reproductive biology and high habitat fragmentation. Herein, we characterize D. lucida foraging activity and response to litter surface temperature in a lowland forest remnant in south-eastern Brazil. The mean flow of workers at nest openings was 3.8 ± 0.6 per hour, mean foraging trip was 14.2 ± 2.2 min, and mean foraging distance was 3.8 ± 0.4 m. The time spent per foraging trip and litter surface temperature were positively correlated. Flow of workers at nest openings was higher with mean temperature of litter surface between 21.0 and 27.0 °C. Our results show that D. lucida has a diurnal foraging activity related to habitat temperature. Our data contribute to the knowledge about the ecology of D. lucida and support the hypothesis of optimal food foraging regulated by habitat temperature. In addition, the better understanding of D. lucida activity patterns can assist on conservation planning of this endangered and endemic ant. Sociobiology An international journal on social insects Flávio Curbani1,2,3, Cássio Zocca1,4,5, Rodrigo B Ferreira4,5,6, Cecilia Waichert1,5,6, Tathiana Guerra Sobrinho7, Ana Carolina Srbek-Araujo1,8,9 Article History Edited by Evandro N. Silva, UEFS, Brazil Received 24 November 2020 Initial acceptance 18 January 2021 Final acceptance 05 February 2021 Publication date 17 March 2021 Keywords Optimal foraging, poneromorph ants, litter surface, microclimate, diet. Corresponding author Flávio Curbani Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Centro Tecnológico Departamento de Tecnologia Industrial Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514, Goiabeiras CEP 29.060-970, Vitória-ES, Brasil. E-Mail: flavio.curbani@ufes.br to the time spent searching for food, affecting foraging efficiency, when the increase in time spent does not result in an increase in the amount of food obtained (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Norberg, 1977; Pyke, 1984; Perry & Pianka, 1997). The trade-off between costs and benefits does not depend only on the forager’s intrinsic factors; external factors (e.g. environmental conditions and prey density) can alter the foraging activity dynamics (Norberg, 1977; Pyke, 1984). The eight species of Dinoponera Roger, 1861 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) are endemics to South America (Kempf, 1971; Lenhart et al., 2013), and 1 - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas, Universidade Vila Velha, Vila Velha-ES, Brazil 2 - Departamento de Tecnologia Industrial, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES, Brazil 3 - Projeto Caiman, Instituto Marcos Daniel, Vitória-ES, Brazil 4 - Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica, Santa Teresa-ES, Brazil 5 - Projeto Bromeligenous, Instituto Marcos Daniel, Vitória-ES, Brazil 6 - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória-ES, Brazil 7 - Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, São Mateus-ES, Brazil 8 - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal, Universidade Vila Velha, Vila Velha-ES, Brazil 9 - Instituto SerraDiCal de Pesquisa e Conservação, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil RESEARCH ARTICLE - ANTS Litter Surface Temperature: A Driving Factor Affecting Foraging Activity in Dinoponera lucida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) mailto:flavio.curbani@ufes.br F Curbani, C Zocca, RB Ferreira, C Waichert, TG Sobrinho, AC Srbek-Araujo – Temperature and Foraging Activity of Dinoponera lucida2 called giant ants because reach up to 40 mm (Kempf, 1971; Lenhart et al., 2013; Escárraga et al., 2017). Among these species, Dinoponera lucida Emery, 1901 is endemic to Brazil’s Atlantic Forest from the states of Espírito Santo, eastern Minas Gerais and southern Bahia (Peixoto et al., 2010; Simon et al., 2020). Currently, only 12% of the area originally covered by Atlantic Forest has forest remnants, mostly small and isolated across the human-altered matrix (Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, 2019). Dinoponera lucida is a forest-specialist and currently recorded only in forest remnants. The area of geographic range of the D. lucida was estimated at 156 km2 (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade & Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2018). Habitat fragmentation causes isolation of populations, since the species is unable to colonize over long distances, leading to a clumped distribution pattern over the geographic range (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade & Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2018). New colonies of D. lucida are generated by fission of extant colonies, increasing inbreeding and reducing genetic diversity, which has led to local extinctions (Mariano et al., 2008; Campiolo et al., 2015), a genetically fragmented distribution (Mariano et al., 2008; Resende et al., 2010; Simon et al., 2016), and endangered (EN) species status on the Brazilian Red List (Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2014; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade & Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2018). Thereby D. lucida conservation is intrinsically linked to the preservation and recovery of the Atlantic Forest and the connection between its forest remnants. How microclimate affects the ecology of D. lucida remains poorly understood. For instance, D. lucida responds to regional temperature and rainfall pattern (Simon et al., 2020); populations settle mainly in areas with higher annual mean temperatures, lower annual temperature range and less precipitation during the driest month (Simon et al., 2020). Microclimatic variables such as temperature, rainfall, and humidity are known to influence the realized niche of insects, and can do so by influencing behavior and foraging strategy (Willmer, 1982; Colinet et al., 2015; Pincebourde & Suppo, 2016; Simon et al., 2020; Welch et al., 2020). Dinoponera lucida increase foraging activity in mild temperature associated with high elevations (Peixoto et al., 2010). The pattern of foraging activity of D. lucida has an optimal temperature range in areas surrounding the nest (Peixoto et al., 2010). Inside the forest, microclimatic variables are influenced by canopy cover, edge effects, evapotranspiration and other factors related to vegetation and habitat heterogeneity (Magnago et al., 2015; Stangler et al., 2015; Boehnke et al., 2017). Thus, an appropriate approach to assess the foraging activity of D. lucida should consider microclimate conditions. Dinoponera lucida commonly prey upon epigeic ectotherm taxa, and these prey respond to temperature, which alters its density and availability (May, 1979; Colinet et al., 2015; Pincebourde & Suppo, 2016; Welch et al., 2020). We expect that D. lucida will adapt foraging time to maintain an optimal strategy (Norberg, 1977; Bernstein, 1979; Azevedo et al., 2014; Medeiros et al., 2014). Herein, we characterized the foraging activity and the response to litter surface temperature by D. lucida. We expected that daily variation in air and litter surface temperatures to influence the foraging activity of D. lucida. Also, we expected more workers to forage during the optimal temperature range, due to physiological constraints and prey availability. Materials and Methods Study site We carried out this study in the Vale Natural Reserve (VNR; 22,711 ha; 19º 09’ 05” S, 40º 04’ 15” W), Linhares, northern Espírito Santo state, south-eastern Brazil. VNR has flat relief and altitude between 28 to 65 m (Peixoto et al., 1995). VNR is an important remnant of the Tabuleiro Forest, which is a specific formation of the Atlantic Forest (Kierulff et al., 2014). VNR region has tropical and humid climate with two dry months (Alvares et al., 2014). The annual mean temperature is 24.3 °C and the annual mean rainfall is 1,214 mm (Kierulff et al., 2014). Sampling We conducted active visual survey in a 30 m × 30 m plot to locate D. lucida workers (19º 09’ 14.5” S, 40º 04’ 14.0” W) from September 29 to October 2, 2017. We used sardines as bait along the worker’s route (Silvestre et al., 2015). We located three nests by following workers carrying the bait back to the nests. We estimated height, width of the nest openings and canopy coverage over the nest openings with the aid of photos analyzed at ImageJ 1.52p software (Schindelin et al., 2012; Schneider et al., 2012). We neither disturbed the workers nor excavated the nests. In the center of the sampling area, we measured air temperature (TA) and relative humidity (RH) at 1.5 m high using a Kestrel portable weather device (model 3000); and litter surface temperature (TS) using a Tekpower digital infrared thermometer (model DT-8380). TA, RH and TS were recorded every 30 min from 6 h to 18 h, which is the expected foraging period of D. lucida (Peixoto et al., 2010). It rained from 6 h to 9 h on the third day of sampling. Flow of workers ceased during the rain. The data affected by rain were not considered for the quantitative analyzes. We observed foraging workers exiting the nests and searching for food in the surrounding litter. We recorded inflow and outflow of workers for 15 min in each nest per hour (Peixoto et al., 2010). We considered inflow (FIN) as the number of workers entering the nest and outflow (FOUT) as the number of workers exiting nests to forage. We considered Sociobiology 68(1): e-6030 (March, 2021) 3 total flow (FT) in the nest openings as the sum of flows of workers. Total flow is colinear with FIN and FOUT. Using the 15 min measured data, we estimated FT per hour in each nest. We used focal-animal sampling (Altmann, 1974) and followed the workers individually during foraging activities from the time workers exited until they returned to the nest. We remained at least 2 m away from the observed worker to avoid interference of behavior. We recorded duration of foraging trip (tf) as the time spent searching for food items from their exit to their return to the nests. We used tf as a proxy to estimate foraging efficiency (η ~ tf -1). We considered a returning worker those that were observed collecting a food item (successful trip) or those that started moving toward the nest even without food item (unsuccessful trip). The efficiency rate of foraging was calculated as number of workers returning to the nest with food divided by total number of workers returning to the nest (Giannotti & Machado, 1991; Medeiros et al., 2014). We defined reached distance (Df) as the maximum distance reached by a worker during a foraging trip, measured as a straight line from the nest opening to the returning point. We identified collected food items visually or from zoomed photos to the lowest possible taxonomic level. Data analysis First, we perform Pearson correlation analyzes between environment variables (TS, TA, and RH), tf - TS, and tf - Df. Because TA is positively correlated with TS, we used TS for description of the behavioral patterns studied, since TS represents the microclimate variable related to the microhabitat of D. lucida workers. We established the curves with the variation of the foraging activity (FT) as function of TS and time of day. A fourth-order polynomial fit was used in the nonlinear regression model to describe the bimodal pattern between FT and time of day. We tested if there was a relationship between FT and TS applying a Pearson’s Chi- squared test (χ2) from a six-categories of TS (from 19 to 31 ºC, with regular intervals of 2 ºC, as showed in Fig 2b) defining a contingency table. The relative frequencies of FT (Rf) were calculated for each hour of the day and each TS category as a proportion of FT in each hour sampled or TS range category divided by the total FT of all hours or all TS categories, as described by equation 1: To calculate the relative frequencies of FT, we calculated the means of FT of all nests to represent the foraging activity in the sampling area. We applied linear regression analysis to describe the relationship between tf and TS. We used Student’s t test to assess differences for each TS category between successful and unsuccessful trips. We used Graphpad Prism 7.00 (GraphPad Software, 2017) to perform statistical analyses. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. We presented the variables in terms of mean ± standard error of the mean (SE). Results Characteristics of the sampling area and nest openings The three monitored nests were beneath understory vegetation roots in a forested area (900 m2) with ground totally covered by leaf litter. The nest density was 33 nests/ha. The mean distance between nests was 11.3 ± 1.4 m, showing a triangular shaping on the ground (nest 1 to 2: 8.5 m, nest 1 to 3: 12.5 m and nest 2 to 3: 13.0 m). Mean canopy cover on the nest’s openings was 79 ± 4 % (nest 1: 74%, nest 2: 86% and nest 3: 78%), which characterizes the sampling area as a mosaic of light and shade. The nests had an elliptical entrance with mean height of 20.4 ± 1.0 mm (nest 1: 18.5 mm, nest 2: 21.5 mm and nest 3: 21.3 mm) and mean width of 41.1 ± 1. mm (nest 1: 43.1 mm, nest 2: 39.7 mm and nest 3: 40.5 mm). Environment variables The TA during the foraging activity was 27.2 ± 0.5 ºC and TS was 24.5 ± 0.6 °C (Table 1). TA and TS were positively correlated (r = 0.89, p < 0.01, n = 26). Highest temperatures were recorded in the middle of the day (Fig 1). The RH during the foraging activity was 82.6 ± 2.1 %, with lower RH in the same hours of higher temperatures (Fig 1). TA and RH were negatively correlated (r = -0.80, p < 0.01, n = 26). TS and RH were also negatively correlated (r = -0.81, p < 0.01, n = 26). Fig 1. Mean air temperature (TA, left y axis, red dotted line), litter surface temperature (TS, left y axis, black solid line), and relative humidity (RH, right y axis, blue dotted line) at each hour of observation. Data sampled at Vale Natural Reserve, Linhares, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Nest flow, foraging activity time, distance, and influence of temperature Dinoponera lucida foraging activities were done between 7 h and 17 h. Dinoponera lucida exhibited a bimodal pattern of foraging activity (r2 = 0.26, p < 0.01, AICc = 209.6, df = 58) (Fig 2a). The first FT peak was between 8 h and 10 h. The second FT peak was recorded between 14 h and 17 h. F Curbani, C Zocca, RB Ferreira, C Waichert, TG Sobrinho, AC Srbek-Araujo – Temperature and Foraging Activity of Dinoponera lucida4 Flow of workers at nest openings was higher (74%) between 21.0 and 27.0 ºC (χ2 = 22.41, df = 5, p < 0.01) (Fig 2b), and lower (26%) between 27.0 and 31.0 ºC. We did not observe foraging activity under rainfall, even when TS reached the values related to the highest FT values. The mean FT at nest openings was 3.8 ± 0.6 h-1 (Table 1). The mean DF of foraging workers was 3.8 ± 0.4 m. Some workers from nest 2 travelled 10.1 m away from the nest entrance, which was the maximum DF observed. The mean tf in foraging activity was 14.2 ± 2.2 min. The tf were independent of Df (r = 0.18, p = 0.15, n = 24). The values of tf were positively correlated to TS values (r = 0.76, p < 0.01, n = 24), with linear regression model (r² = 0.57, F1, 22 = 29.60, p < 0.01, tf = 3.614TS – 75.227) (Fig 3). Fig 2. Flow of workers at openings of Dinoponera lucida nests. (a) Total flow of workers (FT, left y axis, black circles), fourth-order polynomial fit used in the nonlinear regression model of FT as a function of the time of day (left y axis, red solid line), and relative frequency of FT at different time of day (right y axis, blue solid line). (b) Total flow of workers (FT, left y axis, grey bars), and relative frequency of FT (right y axis, blue solid line) at each litter surface temperature category. Data sampled at Vale Natural Reserve, Linhares, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Error bars represent standard errors. Variable Nest Minimum Maximum Mean SE N Df (m) 1 1.0 4.0 2.6 0.4 10 2 1.0 10.1 4.5 0.6 19 3 2.0 5.5 3.5 0.4 8 T 1.0 10.1 3.8 0.4 37 tf (min) 1 2.0 22.0 9.8 3.7 6 2 2.0 20.0 11.8 1.7 12 3 5.0 45.0 23.3 6.1 6 T 2.0 45.0 14.2 2.2 24 FT (h -1) 1 0.0 20.0 2.8 1.0 26 2 0.0 28.0 5.7 1.0 33 3 0.0 16.0 2.2 0.9 24 T 0.0 28.0 3.8 0.6 83 FIN (h -1) 1 0.0 8.0 1.7 0.5 26 2 0.0 16.0 2.7 0.6 33 3 0.0 12.0 1.0 0.6 24 T 0.0 16.0 1.9 0.3 83 FOUT (h -1) 1 0.0 12.0 1.1 0.5 26 2 0.0 12.0 3.0 0.6 33 3 0.0 8.0 1.2 0.5 24 T 0.0 12.0 1.9 0.3 83 TS (ºC) - 19.5 30.3 24.5 0.6 26 TA (ºC) - 21.8 30.9 27.2 0.5 26 RH (%) - 64.7 97.5 82.6 2.1 26 Table 1. Descriptive variables of the foraging activity of Dinoponera lucida and environmental conditions at Vale Natural Reserve, Linhares, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The values are presented for each sampling nest and values marked with T indicate a summary of all observations of each variable in the sampling area. SE: standard error of the mean, n: number of observations, Df: distance reached during foraging activity, tf: time spent in foraging trip, FT, FIN and FOUT: total flow, inflow and outflow of workers in the nest openings, TS: litter surface temperature, TA: air temperature, and RH: relative humidity. We recorded 17 successful trips (TS = 24.6 ± 0.4 ºC) and seven unsuccessful trips (TS = 26.8 ± 0.8 ºC). The TS was lower during successful trips (t = 2.62, p = 0.01). We recorded 37 returns to the nests (29 with food) resulting in an efficiency rate of foraging of 0.78 ± 0.06 (nest 1: 0.70, nest 2: 0.78, nest 3: 0.89). Collected food items We recorded 48 food items collected by D. lucida workers, of which, 94% were animals and 6% vegetation items (Table 2). All food items were solid. We observed workers capturing macroinvertebrates with high mobility (such as spiders, grasshoppers, 78%), low mobility (insect larvae and gastropods, 13%), and no mobility (insect pupae, 9%). These percentages about mobility of macroinvertebrates consider only identified animal food items. Sociobiology 68(1): e-6030 (March, 2021) 5 Discussion Dinoponera lucida presented bimodal cycle on daily foraging activity with a higher peak in the morning. The foraging activity was higher in a range of litter surface temperature between 21.0 and 27.0 ºC, and successful foraging trips were mostly during lower litter surface temperatures (24.6 ± 0.4 ºC) in comparison to unsuccessful trips (26.8 ± 0.8 ºC). Similar patterns were found for D. lucida and Dinoponera quadriceps Kempf, 1971, both showing bimodal foraging cycles and higher peak in the morning than in the afternoon (Peixoto et al., 2010; Medeiros et al., 2014). In contrast, Dinoponera longipes Emery, 1901 seems to be mainly nocturnal, but workers are also active during the day (Morgan, 1993). In addition, Dinoponera gigantea (Perty, 1833) also has a bimodal pattern of foraging activity, but with higher peaks at dawn and dusk (Fourcassié & Oliveira, 2002). Finally, D. lucida likely reduces foraging in response to temperature cues to minimize foraging activity during times of low prey availability (Norberg, 1977; Bernstein, 1979). Dinoponera lucida prey mainly on macroinvertebrates which are also influenced by litter temperature (Bernstein, 1979; May, 1979; Willmer, 1982; Colinet et al., 2015; Pincebourde & Suppo, 2016; Welch et al., 2020). Several epigeic ectotherm taxa, which are potential preys for D. lucida, tend to migrate to deeper layers of litter to forage or for refuge (Willmer, 1982; Colinet et al., 2015; Pincebourde & Suppo, 2016). The foraging activity of D. quadriceps also is positively related to availability of potential prey (Medeiros et al., 2014). Our data suggest that D. lucida limits foraging according to the activity pattern of prey, suggesting an optimization strategy driven by prey availability (Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Norberg, 1977; Perry & Pianka, 1997), with litter temperature serving as a proxy for successful foraging likelihood rather than being a direct influence on D. lucida foraging behavior. Foraging attempts had no relationship with time spent or distance reached, suggesting that the foraging success depends on choosing the appropriate time. It seems that these ants optimize their foraging behavior by relying on the chances to find a food resource instead of covering large areas or traveled distance during the foraging trip. Our data on patterns of flow of workers of D. lucida in foraging was similar to other populations (Peixoto et al., 2010). The increase of time spent in foraging trip could be related to search and capture efficiency, supporting the hypothesis of optimal food searching (Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Norberg, 1977; Perry & Pianka, 1997). The positive correlation between time spent in foraging trip and litter surface temperature suggests the existence of an optimal Fig 3. Scatterplot and linear regression line (blue solid line) of the time spent in foraging trip (tf) of Dinoponera lucida workers as a function of the litter surface temperature (TS) at Vale Natural Reserve, Linhares, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The filled circle with the error bars represents the bivariate means and standard errors. Kingdom Taxon Item N (%) Animalia Arachnida: Araneae spider 5 (10.4) Arachnida: Scorpiones scorpion 1 (2.1) Blattodea cockroach 1 (2.1) Coleoptera beetle 1 (2.1) Hemiptera: Pentatomidae shield bug 1 (2.1) Hymenoptera: Apoidea bee 1 (2.1) Insecta insect larva, likely Lepidoptera 2 (4.2) Insecta insect pupa 2 (4.2) Blattodea: Isoptera termite 4 (8.3) Mollusca: Gastropoda gastropod 1 (2.1) Orthoptera: Caelifera grasshopper 4 (8.3) Squamata: Serpentes snake scale 1 (2.1) Vertebrata fecal pellet 1 (2.1) Unidentified macroinvertebrate 20 (41.7) Plantae Swartzia myrtifolia var. elegans (Schott) R.S.Cowan seed 1 (2.1) Cordia magnoliifolia Cham. fruit 1 (2.1) Angiospermae tree bark 1 (2.1) Table 2. Food items collected by Dinoponera lucida workers in for- aging activity at Vale Natural Reserve, Linhares, state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. N: number of records. Percentages presented in paren- theses are relative to the total of items. F Curbani, C Zocca, RB Ferreira, C Waichert, TG Sobrinho, AC Srbek-Araujo – Temperature and Foraging Activity of Dinoponera lucida6 temperature range for the foraging activity. However, it is not clear that the workers use temperature as a proxy. It seems that temperature is an effective proxy for prey availability. In addition, as temperature is highly correlated with time of day, it may be that they simply use time of day as a proxy for prey availability. It also seems possibly that foraging activity is directly related to prey availability, with ants foraging more when preys are abundant and less as prey availability decreases. As D. lucida is an eusocial species, some decisions about the time to forage could be related to communication between the nestmates (Leonhardt et al., 2016). Further studies could assess these questions assertively with prey density data combined with the other sampled data. According to our data D. lucida was predominantly carnivorous and might be categorized as a hunting and collecting species (Almeida & Queiroz, 2015). We did not observe predation of other ant species, even when they were abundant near a worker in the foraging activity. Similarly, ants were not in the diet of D. quadriceps (Araújo & Rodrigues, 2006). Ants, however, have been observed in low frequency in the diet of other species of Dinoponera (Fourcassié & Oliveira, 2002; Peixoto et al., 2010). Considering the number of prey items, ants comprise 2% of D. lucida diet (Peixoto et al., 2010) and 4% of D. gigantea diet (Fourcassié & Oliveira, 2002). The capture of animals with high mobility (78% of the total macroinvertebrate items) indicates that D. lucida performs active hunting besides collection of food items. This performance was also observed in other species of Dinoponera, including capture of relative larger prey such as small lizards (Sousa & Freire, 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2011; Carvalho et al., 2012). Dinoponera lucida seems to have a more diverse diet than we recorded, which may be related to our short sampling period. Specifically, we identified a relatively low frequency of plant items (6%) when compared to 16% from other population of D. lucida (Peixoto et al., 2010), 22% from D. gigantea (Fourcassié & Oliveira, 2002) and 30% from D. quadriceps (Araújo & Rodrigues, 2006). Workers of D. quadriceps (Araújo & Rodrigues, 2006) and D. gigantea (Fourcassié & Oliveira, 2002) collect mainly animal food items, mostly arthropods, as we observed for D. lucida. It is possible that the diet of D. lucida and others Dinoponera vary seasonally according to the availability of food resources in their territories. Therefore, additional studies on the diet composition of D. lucida may be useful to better describe its ecological role in the Atlantic Forest. Dinoponera lucida and congeners use underground nests in closed-canopy forest (Paiva & Brandão, 1995; Peixoto et al., 2010). Dinoponera as well as the other Ponerinae ants avoid foraging with high insolation (Willmer & Corbet, 1981; Willmer, 1982). It is likely underground and closed-canopy nests prevent water loss (Chown et al., 2011) and regulate nests temperatures (Willmer, 1982; Jones & Oldroyd, 2006). Our results were only focused on three nests. We recommend further study to assess populations level responses to microclimatic factors across the species range. The density recorded herein, however, was similar to the reported by Peixoto et al. (2010), but far from describing a continuous and homogeneous distribution of D. lucida nests in the forest. Nests of D. lucida occur in an aggregate distribution (Peixoto et al., 2010), a consequence of its reproduction mode by colony fission (Mariano et al., 2008; Campiolo et al., 2015). During the active search for nests, we found vast areas within the Atlantic Forest in VNR without the presence of D. lucida workers. This is aligned to the endangered conservation status of the species by Brazilian Red List (Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2014; Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade & Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2018), which does not seem to be particularly abundant, even where adequate conditions and resources exist. Our data support the hypothesis of optimal foraging regulated by habitat temperature. It would be a direct response by prey species and an indirect response by D. lucida as they may respond more directly to prey availability. Time spent in foraging trip and litter temperature were positively correlated. Flow of workers was higher in an optimal litter surface temperature range, with more successful foraging trips and more food items (mainly macroinvertebrates) collected in the same temperature range. The better understanding about D. lucida activity patterns can assist in the planning of study activities, such as monitoring and inventory of this endangered and endemic species. Acknowledgements We are grateful to José Simplício dos Santos for the assistance during location of the D. lucida nests and sampling area set-up. We thank Vale Natural Reserve for the support in field activities. CZZ thanks Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for scholarship and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (001/1700071 and 301362/2021-1). ACSA thanks Universidade Vila Velha (UVV) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES) (0607/2015 and 510/2016). CW thanks FAPES (#85320846) and CNPq (#435045/2018-0). Author Contributions FC: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis and writing CZ: conceptualization, methodology, investigation and writing RBF: conceptualization, methodology and writing ACSA: conceptualization, methodology and writing TGS: formal analysis and writing CW: formal analysis and writing Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose. Sociobiology 68(1): e-6030 (March, 2021) 7 Compliance and ethical approval All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. References Almeida, F.S. & Queiroz, J.M. (2015). Formigas poneromorfas como engenheiras de ecossistemas: Impactos sobre a biologia, estrutura e fertilidade dos solos. In: As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil (eds. Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D.). Editus, Ilhéus, pp. 439–449. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227–267. Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., De Moraes Gonçalves, J.L. & Sparovek, G. (2014). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22: 711–728. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 Araujo, A., Medeiros, J.C., Azevedo, D.L.O., Medeiros, I.A., Neto, W.A.S. & Garcia, D. (2015). Poneromorfas sem rainhas – Dinoponera: Aspectos ecológico-comportamentais. In: As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil (eds. Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D.). Editus, Ilhéus, pp. 237–246. Araújo, A. & Rodrigues, Z. (2006). Foraging behavior of the queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Neotropical Entomology, 35: 159–164. doi: 10.15 90/S1519-566X2006000200002 Azevedo, D.L.O., Medeiros, J.C. & Araújo, A. (2014). Adjustments in the time, distance and direction of foraging in Dinoponera quadriceps workers. Journal of Insect Behavior, 27: 177–191. doi: 10.1007/s10905-013-9412-6 Bernstein, R.A. (1979). Schedules of foraging activity in species of ants. Journal Animal Ecology, 48: 921–930. doi: 10.2307/4204 Boehnke, D., Gebhardt, R., Petney, T. & Norra, S. (2017). On the complexity of measuring forests microclimate and interpreting its relevance in habitat ecology: The example of Ixodes ricinus ticks. Parasites and Vectors, 10: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2498-5 Campiolo, S., Rosário, N.A., Strenzel, G.M.R., Feitosa, R. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2015). Conservação de poneromorfas no Brasil. In: As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil (eds. Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D.). Editus, Ilhéus, pp. 447–462. Carvalho, C.B., Santos, R.A., Rocha, S.M., Caldas, F.L.S., Freitas, E.B., Silva, B.D., et al. (2012). Gymnodactylus geckoides (Naked-toed gecko) predation. Herpetological Bulletin, 121: 40–43. Chown, S.L., Sørensen, J.G. & Terblanche, J.S. (2011). Water loss in insects: An environmental change perspective. Journal of Insect Physiology, 57: 1070–1084. doi: 10.1016/j. jinsphys.2011.05.004 Colinet, H., Sinclair, B.J., Vernon, P. & Renault, D. (2015). Insects in fluctuating thermal environments. Annual Review of Entomology, 60: 123–140. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-01 0814-021017 Emlen, J.M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference. The American Naturalist, 100: 611–617. doi: 10.1086/282455 Escárraga, M.E., Lattke, J.E. & Azevedo, C.O. (2017). Discovery of the Dinoponera lucida male (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), a threatened giant ant from the Atlantic rain forest. Zootaxa, 4347: 128–136. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4347.1.7 Fourcassié, V. & Oliveira, P.S. (2002). Foraging ecology of the giant Amazonian ant Dinoponera gigantea (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae): Activity schedule, diet and spatial foraging patterns. Journal of Natural History, 36: 2211–2227. doi: 10.1080/00222930110097149 Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2019). Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica. 1st edn. São Paulo. Giannotti, E. & Machado, V.L.L. (1991). Notes on the foraging of two species of Ponerinae ants: Food resources and daily hunting activities (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bioikos, 5: 7–17. GraphPad Software. (2017). GraphPad Prism 7.00 for Windows. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade & Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2018). Livro Vermelho Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Invertebrados. Brasília, DF: ICMBio/MMA. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasília, Brasil. Jones, J.C. & Oldroyd, B.P. (2006). Nest thermoregulation in social insects. Advances in Insect Physiology, 33: 153–191. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2806(06)33003-2 Kempf, W.W. (1971). A preliminary review of the ponerine ant genus Dinoponera Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 14: 369–394. Kierulff, M.C.M., Avelar, L.H.S., Ferreira, M.E.S., Povoa, K.F. & Bérnils, R.S. (2014). Reserva Natural Vale: História e aspectos físicos. Ciência & Ambiente, 49: 7–40. Lenhart, P., Dash, S.T. & Mackay, W.P. (2013). A revision of the giant Amazonian ants of the genus Dinoponera (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 31: 119–164. doi: 10.3897/jhr.31.4335 Leonhardt, S.D., Menzel, F., Nehring, V. & Schmitt, T. (2016). Ecology and evolution of communication in social insects. Cell, 164: 1277–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.035 MacArthur, R.H. & Pianka, E.R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist, 100: 603–609. doi: 10.1086/282454 F Curbani, C Zocca, RB Ferreira, C Waichert, TG Sobrinho, AC Srbek-Araujo – Temperature and Foraging Activity of Dinoponera lucida8 Magnago, L.F.S., Rocha, M.F., Meyer, L., Martins, S.V. & Meira-Neto, J.A.A. (2015). Microclimatic conditions at forest edges have significant impacts on vegetation structure in large Atlantic Forest fragments. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 2305–2318. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0961-1 Mariano, C.S.F., Pompolo, S.D.G., Barros, L.A.C., Mariano- Neto, E., Campiolo, S. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2008). A biogeographical study of the threatened ant Dinoponera lucida Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) using a cytogenetic approach. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 1: 161–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00022.x May, M.L. (1979). Insect thermoregulation. Annual Review of Entomology, 24: 313–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.24.01 0179.001525 Medeiros, J., Azevedo, D.L.O., Santana, M.A.D., Lopes, T.R.P. & Araújo, A. (2014). Foraging activity rhythms of Dinoponera quadriceps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in its natural environment. Journal of Insect Science, 14: 1–9. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu082 Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2014). Lista nacional oficial de espécies da fauna ameaçada de extinção. Portaria no 444, de 17 de dezembro de 2014. Diário Oficial da União. Brasil. Morgan, R.C. (1993). Natural history notes and husbandry of the Peruvian giant ant Dinoponera longipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In: SASI-ITAG Invertebrates In Captivity. Tucson, pp. 140–151. Norberg, R.A. (1977). An ecological theory on foraging time and energetics and choice of optimal food-searching method. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 46: 511–529. doi: 10.2307/3827 Paiva, R.V.S. & Brandão, C.R.F. (1995). Nests, worker population, and reproductive status of workers, in the giant queenless ponerine ant Dinoponera Roger (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 7: 297–312. doi: 10.1080/08927014.1995.9522938 Peixoto, A.L., Rosa, M.M.T. & Joels, L.C.M. (1995). Diagramas de perfil e de cobertura de um trecho da floresta de tabuleiro na Reserva Florestal de Linhares (Espírito Santo, Brasil). Acta Botanica Brasilica, 9: 177–193. Peixoto, A.V., Campiolo, S. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2010). Basic ecological information about the threatened ant Dinoponera lucida Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae), aiming its effective long-term conservation. In: Species Diversity and Extinction (ed. Tepper, G.H.). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York., pp. 183–213. Perry, G. & Pianka, E.R. (1997). Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12: 360– 364. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01097-5 Pincebourde, S. & Suppo, C. (2016). The vulnerability of tropical ectotherms to warming is modulated by the microclimatic heterogeneity. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56: 85–97. doi: 10.1093/icb/icw014 Pyke, G.H. (1984). Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15: 523–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515 Resende, H.C., Yotoko, K.S.C., Delabie, J.H.C., Costa, M.A., Campiolo, S., Tavares, M.G., et al. (2010). Pliocene and Pleistocene events shaping the genetic diversity within the central corridor of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101: 949–960. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01534.x Ribeiro, L.B., Ribeiro, M.G. & Freire, E.M.X. (2011). Hemidactylus brasilianus (Amaral’s Brazilian gecko) and Cnemidophorus ocellifer predation. Herpetological Bulletin, 117: 31–32. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9: 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9: 671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089 Silvestre, R., Souza, P.R., Silva, G.S., Trad, B.M. & Lopez, V.M. (2015). Notas sobre interações competitivas envolvendo formigas poneromorfas. In: As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil (eds. Delabie, J.H.C., Feitosa, R.M., Serrão, J.E., Mariano, C.S.F. & Majer, J.D.). Editus, Ilhéus, BA, pp. 173–193. Simon, S.S., Schoereder, J.H. & Teixeira, M.C. (2020). Environmental response of Dinoponera lucida Emery, 1901 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an endemic threatened species of the Atlantic Forest Central Corridor. Sociobiology, 67: 65–73. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v67i1.3662 Simon, S.S., Teixeira, M.D.C. & Salomão, T. (2016). The reallocation of the ant species Dinoponera lucida Emery (Formicidae: Ponerinae) population increasing its local genetic diversity. Sociobiology, 63: 1058. doi: 10.13102/ sociobiology.v63i4.1074 Sousa, P.A.G. & Freire, E.M.X. (2010). Coleodactylus natalensis (NCN) predation. Herpetological Review, 41: 218. Stangler, E.S., Hanson, P.E. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2015). Interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and microclimate on trap-nesting Hymenoptera and their trophic interactions in small secondary rainforest remnants. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 563–577. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014- 0836-x Welch, L.E., Baudier, K.M. & Harrison, J.F. (2020). Warmer mid-day temperatures increase leaf intake by increasing forager speed and success in Atta colombica during the rainy season. Insectes Sociaux, 67: 213–219. doi: 10.1007/s00040- 020-00749-6 Sociobiology 68(1): e-6030 (March, 2021) 9 Willmer, P.G. (1982). Microclimate and the Environmental Physiology of Insects. In: Advances in insect physiology (eds. Berridge, M.J., Treherne, J.E. & Wigglesworth, V.B.). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 1–57. doi: 10.1016/S0065- 2806(08)60151-4 Willmer, P.G. & Corbet, S.A. (1981). Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers. Oecologia, 51: 67–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00344655 Ydenberg, R.C. (2007). Provisioning. In: Foraging: Behavior and ecology (eds. Stephens, D.W., Brown, J.S. & Ydenberg, R.C.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 273-303. _Hlk62214149 __Fieldmark__2691_416698021 __Fieldmark__2644_416698021 __Fieldmark__2655_416698021 __Fieldmark__2681_416698021 _Hlk62224894 __Fieldmark__3132_416698021 __Fieldmark__3157_416698021 _Hlk62240518 __Fieldmark__4202_416698021