Open access journal: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology ISSN: 0361-6525 DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.461-469Sociobiology 61(4): 461-469 (December, 2014) Pollen Analysis of Food Pots Stored by Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a Restinga area Introduction Stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) occur in most tropical or subtropical regions of the world and the Melipona genus is exclusively found in the Neotropical region (Camargo & Pedro, 2007). They have perennial colonies with hundreds to thousands of workers and require continuous foraging activity to meet their food requirements (Roubik, 1989). Faced with the need to forage several food resources, the stingless bees have a generalist behavior concerning the plants visited, but a small number of plant species are most exploited in local communities (Ramalho et al., 1989). The study of the plant-pollinator interaction can be performed by sampling bees in flowers (Imperatriz-Fonseca et al., 2011) or indirectly by morphological identification of pollen loads transported on the workers’ corbiculae or stored in food pots inside their nests (Barth, 2004). Stingless bees usually store food resources in pots built with cerumen (the mixture of bees wax and resin) for the Abstract The geographic distribution of Melipona subnitida Ducke covers the dry areas in the northeastern Brazil, where it plays an important role as pollinator of many wild plant species. In the current study, the botanical species this bee uses as pollen and nectar sources in a restinga area of Maranhão State, Brazil, were identified by analyzing pollen grains present in their storage pots in the nests. Samples were collected from five colonies bimonthly, from April 2010 to February 2011. In all the samples, 58 pollen types were identified; the families Fabaceae (8) and Myrtaceae (5) had the largest number of pollen types. In the pollen pots, 52 pollen types were identified; Fabaceae, Melastomataceae, Myrtaceae and Dilleniaceae species were dominant. In honey samples, 50 pollen types were found, with a predominance of nectariferous and polliniferous plant species. Out of the total of pollen types from nectariferous plants identified in honey, 20 pollen types contributed to the honey composition. Humiria balsamifera occurred in high frequency and was predominant in October. Chrysobalanus icaco, Coccoloba sp., Cuphea tenella and Borreria verticillata were also important for honey composition. The occurrence of a high number of minor pollen types indicated that M. subnitida visits many species in the locality; however, it was possible to observe that its floral preferences are very similar to those from other Melipona species. Sociobiology An international journal on social insects RS Pinto, PMC Albuquerque, MMC Rêgo Article History Edited by Denise Araujo Alves, ESALQ-USP, Brazil Received 30 September 2014 Initial acceptance 06 November 2014 Final acceptance 10 December 2014 Keywords Pollen, honey, nectariferous plants, floral resources, stingless bee, Meliponini. Corresponding author Rafael Sousa Pinto Universidade Federal do Maranhão Departamento de Biologia Laboratório de Estudos Sobre Abelhas Av. dos Portugueses, 1966, 65080-805 São Luís, MA, Brazil E-Mail: rafael_spinto@hotmail.com colony’s future use. The pots that contain pollen or honey are irregularly distributed, using all the free spaces of the hollow or cavity where they are located, and have a completely random arrangement (Camargo, 1970). However, in general, the pollen pots are located closer to the brood combs and opposite to the honey pots. Several studies have identified the plants species collected by stingless bees by analyzing the contents of pollen pots (Ramalho et al., 1989; Wilms & Wiechers, 1997; Pick & Blochtein, 2002) and pollen grains present in honey (Iwama & Melhem, 1979; Carvalho et al., 2001; Martins et al., 2011). Using these analyses, it is possible to define the floral preferences of the visitors; the most abundant pollen types have greater relevance for the bees’ species. The knowledge of the floral resources are necessary for the maintenance of bee communities in their habitats is crucial to understanding the mutualistic relationship between plants and bees and to developing management programs for pollinators, reforestation and environmental restoration RESEARCH ARTICLE - BEES Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil RS Pinto, PMC Albuquerque, MMC Rêgo - Pollen Analysis of Food Pots Stored by Melipona subnitida462 (Luz et al., 2007). For example, strategies for planting natural resources can be developed to supply food during periods of shortage that bees may face. The aim of the current study was to identify the botanical species that are sources of pollen and nectar for Melipona subnitida Ducke in a restinga (coastal sandy plain) environment. M. subnitida, locally known as jandaíra, occurs in Brazil only in the northeast region and is very frequent in the Caatinga biome (Martins, 2002). In Maranhão state, this species occurs in a restinga area of the Lençóis Maranhenses Nacional Park (Rego & Albuquerque, 2006) and in the Parnaíba Delta (Silva et al., 2014). M. subnitida is of great importance for the pollination of the regional native flora (Ferraz et al., 2008) and cultivated plants (Cruz et al., 2004; Silva et al., 2005) and is traditionally reared for honey production, which has a high economic value. Materials and Methods The current study was conducted on a M. subnitida meliponary located in the municipality of Barreirinhas, in the Lençóis Maranhenses National Park (Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses; 2º58’12”S, 42º79’56”W), Maranhão state, Brazil. The climate in the study region is classified as tropical megathermal (Aw’ type, according to the Köppen classification). The average annual temperature is approximately 27°C, and the annual precipitation is approximately 2,000 mm. There are two well-defined seasons: a rainy season from January to July and a dry season from August to December (Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources - IBAMA, 2002). The vegetation of the Lençóis Maranhenses National Park covers an area of 453.28 km², of which 405.16 km² are predominately composed of restinga vegetation. The rest of the vegetation consists of mangroves and riparian forests. The restinga area has plant species that are specific to this type of vegetation and plants characteristic of Cerrado (Brazilian savanna), Caatinga (semi-arid) and rainforest. Shrub species are dominant, and herbaceous communities are also present in large areas surrounding lakes (Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources - IBAMA, 2002). Samples of the pollen and honey pots were collected in April, June, August, October and December 2010 and February 2011 from five randomly chosen nests. In each nest, 2-3 g of pollen and 10 ml of honey were extracted with a spatula and a disposable syringe, respectively. In total, 30 pollen samples and 30 honey samples were collected (5 nests x 6 months). Pollen and honey samples were acetolysed by Erdtman’s method (1960) to facilitate the observation of the outer pollen wall (exine). However, the honey samples (10 ml) were divided into two test tubes before they were subjected to the acetolysis process (Erdtman, 1960). Distilled water (10 ml) was added to each tube, and the tubes were centrifuged for 5 min at 2,000 rpm (Louveaux et al., 1978). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was subjected to the acetolysis process. Slides were then prepared using glycerin jelly for optical microscopy analysis. The pollen grains were separated into pollen types according to their morphology and were photographed under a Zeiss Primo Star optical microscope. The identification of the pollen grains was performed by comparing them with both a pollen collection from the regional flora and the literature (Roubik & Moreno, 1991; Carreira & Barth, 2003; Silva et al., 2010). The classification system adopted for the level of family was the APG III (2009). In total, 2,000 and 1,000 pollen grains from each pollen and honey pot were counted, respectively. The monthly means of five pollen and honey samples were calculated. The quantitative results were classified as frequency classes (Louveaux et al., 1978): Predominant pollen ‘P’ (more than 45% of the grains counted), Secondary pollen ‘S’ (15% to 45%), Important minor pollen ‘I’ (3% to 15%) and Minor pollen ‘M’ (less than 3%). Based on the literature and floristic surveys performed in the study region, the pollen types identified in honey that were considered to be from nectariferous plants were separately analyzed to determine which species actually contributed to the honey composition. Minitab®15 software was used to generate the dendrograms of percentage similarity of the two types of pots analyzed. Results Fifty-eight pollen morphospecies were observed in the M. subnitida food samples. In the qualitative analysis of the pollen pots, 52 pollen types belonging to 29 families, 40 genera and 29 species were recorded. Only two pollen types were not identified (Table 1). Fifty pollen types were present in the honey samples, which were grouped into 29 families, 37 genera and 28 species. Four pollen types were indeterminate (Table 1). The botanical families with greatest species diversity in the samples’ pollen spectra were Fabaceae (8), Myrtaceae (5), Malpighiaceae (3) and Melastomataceae (3). Most plants species occurred occasionally (minor pollen) in the samples. Of the pollen types identified in the pollen pots, only 12 (23.07%) were identified with percentages higher than 3% in any given month. In the honey, 17 pollen types (34%) were considered at least once as important minor, secondary or predominant pollens. Figure 1 shows the percentage frequencies of the main species identified in the pollen (Fig 1A) and honey samples (Fig 1B) throughout the study. In pollen pots, Mimosa misera Benth. (Fabaceae) (Fig 2A), Chamaecrista ramosa (Vogel) H.S. Irwin & Barneby (Fabaceae) (Fig 2B), Mouriri guianensis Aubl. (Melastomataceae) (Fig 2C), Doliocarpus sp. (Dilleniaceae) (Fig 2D), Myrcia obtusa Schauer (Myrtaceae) (Fig 2E), Comolia lythrarioides Naudin (Melastomataceae) (Fig 2F), Myrcia sp. 3 (Myrtaceae), Tibouchina sp. (Melastomataceae), Myrcia sylvatica (Myrtaceae) and Eugenia sp. (Myrtaceae) were particularly abundant. In April, the presence of Orbignya phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) was also noteworthy. Sociobiology 61(4): 461-469 (December, 2014) 463 Pollen Pots Honey Pots Family Pollen Type Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Amaranthaceae Alternanthera sp. M M Anacardiaceae Anacardium microcarpum M M M M M M Arecaceae Arecaceae type M M M M M M M Orbignya phalerata I M M M M M M I M M Asteraceae Wulffia baccata M M M M Bignoniaceae Arrabidaea dispar M M M Bignoniaceae type M M Boraginaceae Heliotropium sp. M M Burseraceae Protium heptaphyllum M M M M M Caryocaraceae Caryocar brasiliense M M M Chrysobalanaceae Chrysobalanus icaco M M M M M M M M I I I I Licania sp. M M Clusiaceae Clusia grandiflora M M M M M M Dilleniaceae Doliocarpus sp. M I M M M P I M I M M S Euphorbiaceae Croton sp. M M M Mabea pohliana M M M M Fabaceae Abarema cochleata M M Centrosema sp. M M M M M Chamaecrista ramosa M S S S M M I I M M M M Copaifera sp. M M M M M M Mimosa caesalpiniifolia M M M M M Mimosa misera S P S P M M S S I I M M Senna sp. M M M M M Stryphnodendron adstringens M M M M M M M M M Gentianaceae Irlbachia pratensis M Humiriaceae Humiria balsamifera M M M M M M I I I P I I Loranthaceae Phthirusa pyrifolia M M M M M M Lythraceae Cuphea tenella M M M M M I M M M M M Malpighiaceae Byrsonima chrysophylla M M M M M Byrsonima crassifolia M M M M M M M M M M Mascagnia sp. M M M Malvaceae Sida sp. M Melastomataceae Comolia lythrarioides I I I M M I I P M M I Mouriri guianensis S M I I S P I I I I S I Tibouchina sp. I M I M I I M M M I Meliaceae Meliaceae type M M Menyanthaceae Nymphoides indica M M M M M Myrtaceae Eugenia sp. I M M M I I M M M Myrcia obtusa M M M M S M M M M M I I Myrcia sylvatica I M I M I M I S Myrcia sp.3 M M M M S M M I Myrcia sp.4 M M M I Ochnaceae Ouratea racemiformis M M M M Passifloraceae Passiflora sp. M Turnera ulmifolia M M M M M M Poaceae Poaceae type M M M M M M M Polygonaceae Coccoloba sp. I M M M M I M I I Rubiaceae Borreria latifolia M M M Borreria verticillata M M M M M M I I M M M M Rutaceae Citrus sp. M Sapindaceae Paullinia pinnata M Sapotaceae Pouteria sp. M M M M M Xyridaceae Xyris paraensis M M M M Not Identified Type 01 M Type 02 M M M M Type 03 M Type 04 M Type 05 M M M M Table 1. Occurrences and frequencies of pollen types in pollen and honey pots of Melipona subnitida in a restinga area, Maranhão state, Brazil. Classification: P – Predominant Pollen (more than 45% of the grains counted), S – Secondary Pollen (15 to 45%), I – Important Minor Pollen (3 to 15%) and M – Minor Pollen (less than 3%). Apr (April), Jun (June), Aug (August), Oct (October), Dec (December), Feb (February). RS Pinto, PMC Albuquerque, MMC Rêgo - Pollen Analysis of Food Pots Stored by Melipona subnitida464 The major pollen types identified in the honey samples were M. misera, Humiria balsamifera Aubl. (Humiriaceae) (Fig 2G), M. guianensis, C. lythrarioides, Doliocarpus sp., Chrysobalanus icaco L. (Chrysobalanaceae) (Fig 2H) and Coccoloba sp.. Other species also stood out in a few of the months, such as O. phalerata, C. ramosa, Cuphea tenella Hook. & Arn. (Lythraceae), Tibouchina sp., Borreria verticillata (L.) G. Mey. (Rubiaceae) and all the species of the family Myrtaceae. In the similarity dendrogram of the pollen pots, the samples from April, June, August and October were grouped together with 86.89% of similarity; the samples from June and October had 98.43% of similarity. Conversely, February and December were the least similar months compared to the other months (Fig 3A). In the similarity dendrogram of the honey samples, December and February had 75.70% of similarity. The samples collected in August had 73.55% of similarity with the samples collected in April and June. Samples collected in April and June had the highest similarity (95.87%). The samples collected in October showed less similarity with those collected in the other months (Fig 3B). Fig 1. Percentages of pollen types identified in the samples from (A) pollen pots and (B) honey pots of Melipona subnitida in a restinga area, Maranhão state, Brazil. Based on floristic surveys performed in the region and specialized literature, we separated the genera and species of nectariferous plants present in honey. Of the 50 pollen types recorded in the honey samples, 20 were from plants that contributed to the production of M. subnitida honey (Table 2). Fig 2. Photomicrographs of pollen types observed in food pots of Melipona subnitida. (A) Mimosa misera, (B) Chamaecrista ramosa, (C) Mouriri guianensis, (D) Doliocarpus, (E) Myrcia obtusa, (F) Comolia lythrarioides, (G) Humiria balsamifera, and (H) Chrysobalanus icaco. Bar scale – 10 µm. Fig 3. Similarity dendrogram based on the percentage data of (A) the 52 pollen types in pollen pots and (B) the 50 pollen types in honey pots of Melipona subnitida. Assessing the number of pollen quantified in nectariferous plants only, we calculated the percentage frequencies of those pollen types in each month. Humiria balsamifera occurred as Sociobiology 61(4): 461-469 (December, 2014) 465 al. (2012) in a botanical survey on the border of Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte states, also noted that the M. subnitida visited many Fabaceae species. This seems to fit the pattern of phylogenetically close species that interact with a similar set of species in a wide geographic range, with highly conserved associations (Thompson, 2005; Rezende et al., 2007). Fabaceae and Myrtaceae families had the greatest number of observed pollen types, a finding that is closely related to the large richness of Fabaceae and Myrtaceae species and specimens in restinga areas of northeastern Brazil (Freire & Monteiro, 1993; Santos-Filho et al., 2013). Three Melastomataceae species were very important for M. subnitida. This plant family is one of the most representative in South America (Ramalho et al., 1990). Given that many species of this family bloom sequentially throughout the year (Wilms & Wiechers, 1997), a high frequency of Melastomataceae in the food samples would be expected because of the intrinsic preference of Melipona for this plant family. The preference of M. subnitida for species of Melastomataceae and Chamaecrista ramosa must be attributed to the fact that the flowers of those plants have poricidal anthers, which restrict the number of floral visitors. This feature is important for the foraging activity of Melipona, the only highly Honey Pots Family Pollen type Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Anacardiaceae Anacardium microcarpum 6.67 2.09 0.73 Asteraceae Wulffia baccata 0.12 0.75 0.09 Boraginaceae Heliotropium sp. 0.03 Burseraceae Protium heptaphyllum 7.72 1.95 3.40 1.95 Caryocaraceae Caryocar brasiliense 0.15 0.04 Chrysobalanaceae Chrysobalanus icaco 3.13 5.44 24.56 13.32 41.84 27.80 Euphorbiaceae Mabea pohliana 6.84 Fabaceae Centrosema sp. 0.09 Copaifera sp. 0.36 0.52 0.09 Mimosa caesalpiniifolia 0.72 2.93 0.42 1.08 Stryphnodendron adstringens 0.39 2.72 0.05 1.04 1.03 Gentianaceae Irlbachia pratensis 0.09 Humiriaceae Humiria balsamifera 28.33 32.58 43.63 82.14 31.59 21.11 Loranthaceae Phtirusa pyrifolia 0.05 0.40 0.13 Lythraceae Cuphea tenella 20.74 0.81 4.23 0.14 3.39 0.16 Menyanthaceae Nymphoides indica 0.33 0.06 Passifloraceae Turnera ulmifolia 5.55 6.05 3.34 0.05 Polygonaceae Coccoloba sp. 11.75 12.47 13.37 20.62 41.97 Rubiaceae Borreria verticillata 21.94 22.40 1.15 0.14 1.08 7.71 Sapotaceae Pouteria sp. 0.37 0.07 Table 2. Frequencies (%) of pollen types of nectariferous species from honey samples produced by Melipona subnitida in a restinga area, Maranhão state, Brazil. secondary pollen in five of the six samples; in October, it was the predominant nectariferous species, with 82.14% of the total grains counted. Chrysobalanus icaco was identified as secondary pollen in August, December and February. Coccoloba sp. was considered secondary pollen in December and February. Two other species worth noting were Borreria verticillata and Cuphea tenella (Table 2). Discussion In the current study, we observed that M. subnitida depends on a variety of plant species to obtain pollen and nectar, but this specie prefers a particular plant spectrum. In the restinga region of the Maranhão eastern coast, M. subnitida collected pollen preferably from Fabaceae, Melastomataceae, Myrtaceae and Dilleniaceae species, which are frequently observed in palynological studies of pollen of the genus Melipona (Kerr et al., 1986/1987; Ramalho et al., 1989; Marques-Souza, 1996; Wilms & Wiechers, 1997; Luz et al., 2011). In the Brazilian semi-arid region, where M. subnitida is abundant, the floral preferences of this species also agree with our study. Silva et al. (2006), in Paraíba state, observed the dominance of Mimosa and other Fabaceae species in pollen stored by M. subnitida. In addition, Maia-Silva et RS Pinto, PMC Albuquerque, MMC Rêgo - Pollen Analysis of Food Pots Stored by Melipona subnitida466 eusocial genus that performs buzz pollination – the capacity to vibrate flowers with poricidal anthers (Buchmann, 1983; Nunes-Silva et al., 2013). However, pollen collection is not restricted to this flower type, and the behavior of vibrating the thoracic flight muscles also occurs when visiting non-poricidal flowers, such as several Myrtaceae species and Mimosa (Nunes- Silva et al., 2010), which were abundant in the study samples. The predominance of Doliocarpus in the February pollen samples is likely due to the great supply of this resource in that month. All the plant species visited have flowering peaks – periods with the highest number of flowers available, which is crucial for attracting foraging bees. Therefore, consecutive months tend to be more similar in regards to the plants visited, as observed by the similarity analyses of bimonthly samples. Orbignya phalerata (the babassu, a native species of the transition zone between the Cerrado and the South Amazonian open forests (Albiero et al., 2007)) was recorded in the pollen pots in April, and it was also a relevant species among the studied samples, although to a lower degree. Several species of family Arecaceae are visited by bees due to the plants prolonged flowering and pollen abundance in their inflorescences (Oliveira et al., 2009). Regarding the honey analysis, there was a high richness of pollen types in the samples, which usually hinders the determination of the nectariferous species. The polliniferous species tend to be greatly represented in honey and are considered contaminants because either the pollen grains were attached to the bee’s body or the flower of the nectariferous species was contaminated by pollen from anemophilous plants that attached to the nectaries (Barth, 1989). The pollen types of plants that do not produce nectar but are present in honey are important because they help to broaden the knowledge of the flora where the colonies are located. Mimosa misera was the most representative plant in the pollen pots and was abundant in the honey samples collected in April and June. Mimosa misera is a polliniferous species (Novais et al., 2009) and was therefore excluded from the honey analysis because it was considered a contaminant. Nevertheless, some authors consider Mimosa species to be nectar sources for M. subnitida (Almeida-Muradian et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2013). However, in general, the Mimosa genus consists of plants that produce high amounts of pollen and relatively little nectar, as they are over-represented in the pollen spectra. To be considered free of these contaminating plants, the honey samples need to have more than 98% of pollen from nectariferous species (Barth, 1989). It is noteworthy that the polliniferous Chamaecrista ramosa and Melastomataceae and Myrtaceae species were abundant in the honey samples but did not contribute to its production. According to Buchmann (1983), plants adapted to buzz pollination, such as species of Melastomataceae and C. ramosa, usually experience secondary loss of floral nectar. The true nectariferous importance of many Myrtaceae species is also doubtful because their flowers supply high amounts of pollen grains as their main resource but produce small amounts of nectar (Wilms & Wiechers, 1997; Gressler et al., 2006). In floristic surveys performed in the study region, Myrtaceae species were only considered as pollen sources. Of the more abundant nectariferous species in the honey samples, Humiria balsamifera was present in all samples, since it blooms throughout the entire year (Machado et al., 2007). On average, each specimen of this plant has 50,000 small flowers (Viana & Kleinert, 2006), and they produce a small amount of nectar (Machado et al., 2007). Thus, M. subnitida foragers may compensate for the small of amount of nectar offered by the plants by continually visiting the abundant flowers. Humiria balsamifera was considered predominant in October; therefore, honey sampled in October can be characterized as unifloral honey, due to the pollen dominance of this species (Barth, 2004). Although H. balsamifera was less frequent in other months, Ohe et al. (2004) noted that honey samples may be underrepresented in the pollen from plants that provided the nectar. For example, the occurrence of 2% to 42% of Citrus pollen in a honey sample is enough to characterize it as unifloral. The nectariferous species Chrysobalanus icaco, Coccoloba sp. and Borreria verticillata, which were greatly important in different samples, are examples of sub- representations, not reflecting the real importance of those plants for M. subnitida. The possibility cannot be ruled out that at certain periods of the year, some honeys are produced solely from one of those plants. The only representative of Lythraceae family (Cuphea tenella) was observed throughout the entire study in honey samples, but the percentage was only high in April. This finding may be related to increased flowering in that period and the bees’ preference for certain food sources, depending on the ease of food gathering, the quantity and quality of trophic resources and interactions with competitors (Cortopassi-Laurino & Ramalho, 1988). In the coastal dunes of Abaeté, Cuphea brachiata Mart. ex Koehne produces nectar constantly but with low sugar concentrations (Viana & Kleinert, 2006), which can also occur with C. tenella, thus making it less attractive to bees. In the pollen and honey samples, most of the pollen types was considered as minor pollen, indicating the polylectic nature of this bee. Plants with low pollen frequencies may have reduced pollen production or may be present in the samples due to the bees’ indirect collection behavior. It is also known that different pollen types may be either stored for prolonged periods or be immediately offered to brood; therefore, minor pollens are poorly represented in the analyses of pollen pots (Malagodi-Braga & Kleinert, 2009). It must be considered that less frequent plants complement the colony’s needs, ensuring nutritional balance in environments where the floral resource supply constantly changes due to seasonality. Sociobiology 61(4): 461-469 (December, 2014) 467 The spectrum of floral sources visited by M. subnitida indicates its benefit for the pollination of several native species of the Lençóis Maranhenses restinga, as the bees clearly have a strong mutualistic relationship with both pollen-supplying and nectar-producing plants. In general, M. subnitida has botanical affinities that are very similar to those of Melipona genus. Acknowledgments The authors thank Dr. Léa Carreira of the Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Msc. Angela Corrêa and Dr. Maria Amélia Cruz of the Botanical Institute of São Paulo (Instituto de Botânica de São Paulo) for their cooperation in identifying pollen types. The authors also thank Irene Aguiar, Mr. Emídio and Mrs. Maria, the owners of the jandaíra meliponary, and the Research and Scientific Development Foundation of Maranhão (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico do Maranhão – FAPEMA) for financial support. References Albiero, D., Maciel, A.J.S., Lopes, A.C. & Gamero, C.A. (2007). Proposta de uma máquina para colheita mecanizada de babaçu (Orbignya phalerata Mart.) para a agricultura familiar. Acta Amazon. 37: 337-346. doi: 10.1590/S0044- 59672007000300004 Almeida-Muradian, L.B., Stramm, K.M., Horita, A., Barth, O.M., Freitas, A.S. & Estevinho, L.M. (2013). Comparative study of the physicochemical and palynological characteristics of honey from Melipona subnitida and Apis mellifera. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 48: 1698-1706. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.12140 APG III. (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1095- 8339.2009.00996.x Barth, M.O. (1989). O pólen no mel brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Gráfica Luxor, 45 p. Barth, M.O. (2004). Melissopalynology in Brazil: A review of pollen analysis of honey, propolis and pollen loads of bees. Sci. Agric. 61: 342-350. doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162004000300018 Buchmann, S.L. (1983). Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In C.E. Jones & R.J. Little (Eds.), Handbook of experimental pollination biology (pp. 73-113). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Camargo, J.M.F. (1970). Ninhos e biologia de algumas espécies de meliponíneos (Hymenoptera: Apidae) da região de Porto Velho, território de Rondônia, Brasil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 16: 203-239. Camargo, J.M.F. & Pedro, S.R.M. (2007). Meliponini Lepeletier, 1836. In J.S. Moure, D. Urban & G.A.R. Melo (Eds.), Catalogue of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical region (pp. 272-578). Curitiba: Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Carreira, L.M.M. & Barth, O.M. (2003). Atlas de pólen da vegetação de canga da Serra de Carajás. Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, 112 p. Carvalho, C.A.L., Moreti, A.C.C.C., Marchini, L.C., Alves, R.M.O. & Oliveira, P.C.F. (2001). Pollen spectrum of honey “uruçu” bee (Melipona scutellaris Latreille, 1811). Rev. Bras. Biol., 61: 63-67. doi: 10.1590/S0034-71082001000100009 Cortopassi-Laurino, M. & Ramalho, M. (1988). Pollen harvest by Africanized Apis mellifera and Trigona spinipes in São Paulo botanical and ecological views. Apidologie 19: 1-24. doi: 10.1051/apido:19880101 Cruz, D.O., Freitas, B.M., Silva, L.A., Silva, E.V.S. & Bomfim, I.G.A. (2004). Adaptação e comportamento de pastejo da abelha jandaíra (Melipona subnitida Ducke) em ambiente protegido. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 26: 293-298. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v26i3.1777 Erdtman, G. (1960). The acetolysis method. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561-564. Ferraz, R.E., Lima, P.M., Pereira, D.S., Freitas, C.C.O. & Feijó, F.M.C. (2008). Microbiota fúngica de Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 37: 345-6. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000300017 Freire, M.C.C.C. & Monteiro, R. (1993). Florística das praias da Ilha de São Luís, Estado do Maranhão (Brasil): Diversidade de espécies e suas ocorrências no litoral brasileiro. Acta Amazon. 23: 125-140. Gressler, E., Pizo, M.A. & Morellato, L.P.C. (2006). Polinização e dispersão de sementes em Myrtaceae do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Bot. 29: 509-530. doi: 10.1590/S0100-84042006000400002 Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., Alves-dos-Santos, I., Santos-Filho, P.S., Engels, W., Ramalho, M., Wilms, W., Aguilar, J.B.V., Pinheiro- Machado, C.A., Alves, D.A. & Kleinert, A.M.P. (2011). Checklist of bees and honey plants from São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 11: 1-25. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032011000500029 Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). (2002). Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses - Plano de Manejo. Iwama, S. & Melhem, T.S. (1979). The pollen spectrum of the honey of Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Apidae, Meliponinae). Apidologie 10: 275-295. doi: 10.1051/apido:19790305 Kerr, W.E., Absy, M.L. & Marques-Souza, A.C. (1986/1987). Espécies nectaríferas e poliníferas utilizadas pela abelha Melipona compressipes fasciculata, no Maranhão. Acta Amazon. 16/17: 145-156. Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A. & Vorwohl, G. (1978). Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59: 139-157. Luz, C.F.P., Fernandes-Salomão, T.M., Lage, L.G.A., Resende, H.C., Tavares, M.G. & Campos, L.A.O. (2011). Pollen sources for Melipona capixaba Moure & Camargo: An endangered Brazilian stingless bee. Psyche 2011: 1-7. doi: 10.1155/2011/107303 RS Pinto, PMC Albuquerque, MMC Rêgo - Pollen Analysis of Food Pots Stored by Melipona subnitida468 Luz, C.F.P., Thomé, M.L. & Barth, O.M. (2007). Recursos tróficos de Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) na região de Morro Azul do Tinguá, Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rev. Bras. Bot. 30: 29-36. doi: 10.1590/S0100-84042007000100004 Machado, C.G., Coelho, A.G., Santana, C.S. & Rodrigues, M. (2007). Beija-flores e seus recursos florais em uma área de campo rupestre da Chapada Diamantina, Bahia. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 15: 267-279. Retrieved from: http://inot.org.br/wp-content/uploads/ Beija-flores_e_seus_recursos_florais_em_uma_%C3%A1rea_ de_campo_rupestre_da_Chapada_Diamantina_Bahia.pdf Maia-Silva, C., Silva, C.I., Hrncir, M., Queiroz, R.T. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. (2012). Guia de Plantas visitadas por abelhas na Caatinga. http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/203/_ arquivos/livro_203.pdf (accessed date: 11 March, 2013). Malagodi-Braga, K.S. & Kleinert, A.M.P. (2009). Comparative analysis of two sampling techniques for pollen gathered by Nannotrigona testaceicornis Lepeletier (Apidae, Meliponini). Genet. Mol. Res. 8: 596-606. doi: 0.4238/vol8-2kerr014 Marques-Souza, A.C. (1996). Fontes de pólen exploradas por Melipona compressipes manaosensis (Apidae: Meliponinae), abelha da Amazônia Central. Acta Amazon. 26: 77-86. Martins, A.C.L., Rêgo, M.M.C., Carreira, L.M.M. & Albuquerque, P.M.C. (2011). Espectro polínico de mel de tiúba (Melipona fasciculata Smith, 1854, Hymenoptera, Apidae). Acta Amazon. 4: 183-190. doi: 10.1590/S0044- 59672011000200001 Martins, C.F. (2002). Diversity of the bee fauna of the Brazilian Caatinga. In P.G. Kevan, & V.L. Imperatriz-Fonseca (Eds.), Pollinating bees – the conservation link between agriculture and nature (pp. 131-134). Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Novais, J.S., Lima, L.C.L. & Santos, F.A.R. (2009). Botanical affinity of pollen harvested by Apis mellifera L. in a semi-arid area from Bahia, Brazil. Grana 48: 224-234. doi: 10.1080/00173130903037725 Nunes-Silva, P., Hrncir, M. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. (2010). A polinização por vibração. Oecol. Aust. 14: 140-151. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2010.1401.07 Nunes-Silva, P., Hrncir, M., Silva, C.I., Roldão, Y.S. & Imperatriz- Fonseca, V.L. (2013). Stingless bees, Melipona fasciculata, as efficient pollinators of eggplant (Solanum melongena) in greenhouses. Apidologie 44: 537-546. doi: 10.1007/s13592-013-0204-y Ohe, W.V.D., Oddo, L.P., Piana, M.L., Morlot, M. & Martin, P. (2004). Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie 35: S18-S25. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004050 Oliveira, F.P.M., Absy, M.L. & Miranda, I.S. (2009). Recurso polínico coletado por abelhas sem ferrão (Apidae, Meliponinae) em um fragmento de floresta na região de Manaus – Amazonas. Acta Amazon. 39: 505-518. doi: 10.1590/S0044- 59672009000300004 Pick, R.A. & Bloctein, B. (2002). Atividades de coleta e origem floral do pólen armazenado em colônias de Plebeia saiqui (Holmberg) (Hymenoptra, Apidae, Meliponinae) no Sul do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 19: 289-300. doi: 10.1590/S0101- 81752002000100025 Ramalho, M. (1990). Foraging by the stingless bees of the genus Scaptotrigona (Apidae, Meliponinae). J. Apicult. Res. 29: 61-67. Ramalho, M., Kleinert-Giovannini, A. & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. (1989). Utilization of floral resources by species of Melipona (Apidae, Meliponinae): floral preferences. Apidologie 20: 185-195. doi: 10.1051/apido:19890301 Rêgo, M.M.C & Albuquerque, P.M.C. (2006). Redescoberta de Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera: Apidae) nas Restingas do Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses, Barreirinhas, MA. Neotrop. Entomol. 35: 416-417. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000300020 Rezende, E.L., Lavabre, J.E., Guimarães Jr, P.R., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. (2007). Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448: 925-929. doi:10.1038/nature05956 Roubik, D.W. (1989). Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. New York: Cambridge University Press, 526 p. Roubik, D.W. & Moreno, J.E. (1991). Pollen and Spores of Barro Colorado Island. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, 268 p. Santos-Filho, F.S., Almeida Jr, E.B. & Zickel, C.S. (2013). Do edaphic aspects alter vegetation structures in the Brazilian restinga? Acta Bot. Bras. 27: 613-623. doi: 10.1590/S0102- 33062013000300019 Silva, C.I., Ballesteros, P.L.O., Palmero, M.A., Bauermann, S.G., Evaldt, A.C.P. & Oliveira, P.E. (2010). Catálogo polínico: Palinologia aplicada em estudos de conservação de abelhas do gênero Xylocopa no Triângulo Mineiro. Uberlândia: EDUFU, 154 p. Silva, E.M.S., Freitas, B.M., Silva, L.A., Cruz, D.O. & Bomfim, I.G.A. (2005). Biologia floral do pimentão (Capsicum annuum) e a utilização da abelha jandaíra (Melipona subnitida Ducke) como polinizador em cultivo protegido Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 36: 386- 390. http://www.ccarevista.ufc.br/seer/index.php/ccarevista/ article/view/256/ 251 (accessed date: 11 March, 2013). Silva, G.R., Souza, B.A., Pereira, F.M., Lopes, M.T.R., Valente, S.E.S. & Diniz, F.M. (2014). New molecular evidence for fragmentation between two distant populations of the threatened stingless bee Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). J. Hymenopt. Res. 38: 1-9. doi: 10.3897/JHR.38.7302 Silva, T.M.S., Camara, C.A., Lins, A.C.S., Barbosa-Filho, J.M., Silva, E.M.S., Freitas, B.M. & Santos, F.A.R. (2006). Chemical composition and free radical scavenging activity of pollen loads from stingless bee Melipona subnitida Ducke. J. Food Comp. Anal. 19: 507-511. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2005.12.011 Silva, T.M.S., Santos, F.P., Evangelista-Rodrigues, A., Silva, Sociobiology 61(4): 461-469 (December, 2014) 469 E.M.S., Silva, G.S., Novais, J.S., Santos, F.A.R. & Camara, C.A. (2013). Phenolic compounds, melissopalynological, physicochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of jandaíra (Melipona subnitida) honey. J. Food Comp. Anal. 29: 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2012.08.010 Thompson, J.N. (2005). The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 443 p. Viana, B.F. & Kleinert, A.M.P. (2006). Structure of bee- flower system in the coastal sand dune of Abaeté, Northeast of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 50: 53-63. doi: 10.1590/S0085- 56262006000100008 Wilms, W. & Wiechers, W. (1997). Floral resource partitioning between native Melipona bees and the introduced Africanized honey bee in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Apidologie 28: 339-355. doi: 10.1051/apido:19970602