135 Distribution of Resources Collected Among Individuals From Colonies of Mischocyttarus drewseni (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) by Eliani Rodrigues da Silva1, 3, Olga Coutinho Togni2, 4 , Gabriela de Almeida Locher 2,5 & Edilberto Giannotti2, 6 ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution pattern of the food collected among groups of individuals in Mischocyttarus drewseni colonies. This behavior is one of the first actions exhibited by the foragers when they arrive in the colonies. Regarding nectar and prey collection, 95.90% of the collected nectar was given to larvae, whereas 3.57% to dominant individu- als and 95.94% of the collected prey were given to the larvae, 2.54% to the dominant members, while the remainder of both was given to the workers. Despite not being significant, it was possible to observe a difference in food distribution among larvae, with larger larvae receiving more food than others. When the forager returns to the nest with pulp, it adds this material to cells in 64.29% of the times. Males showed agitated behavior with the arrival of the foragers, and sometimes took the foraged material from them. INTRODUCTION Mischocyttarus de Saussure (1853) is the largest group of social wasps, consisting of 245 species, distributed in nine subgenera, being mainly Neo- tropical (Richards 1978; Carpenter & Marques 2001; Silveira 2008). These wasps are considered primitive eusocial species, with independent founda- tion and without morphological caste differentiation. The dominant and subordinate females may assume any role, according to their colony's need, due to the small number of individuals and the fact they are all potentially reproductive (Litte 1981; Jeanne 1986; Murakami 2007). 1 Centro Universitário de Votuporanga, Caixa Postal 81, 15500006, Votuporanga, SP, Brazil 2 Departamento de Zoologia - Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Caixa Postal 199; 13506-900, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. 3 eliani@fev.edu.br; 4 olgatogni@yahoo.com.br; 5 gabriela.locher@gmail.com; 6edilgian@rc.unesp.br 136 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 Although these wasps have high behavioral plasticity, the dominance hier- archy creates a social dynamic based on the nutritional cost and benefits from the behaviors performed. The dominant members avoid activities with high energ y cost, such as foraging, by creating a nutritional reserve that improves their reproductive capacity in the colony; thus, increasing their dominance over other females (Markiewicz & O’Donnell 2001). Therefore, the foraging activity, which consists of leaving the nest to collect resources for the maintenance of the colony, is a crucial aspect to elucidate issues related to the evolution of sociality (Smith 2005), since the main behavioral interactions conducted by social wasps are related to the capture and division of materials collected among the members of the colony (Rocha & Giannotti 2007). The distribution of the resources collected among individuals from the colony is one of the first behavioral acts exhibited by foragers after the arrival in the field. This behavior is the main goal of the foraging process, and often the trophallaxis among adults is held immediately after the arrival of foragers, even before entering the nest (Rocha & Giannotti 2007; Sugden & Mcallen 1994; Cruz et al. 2006). Despite its importance, studies related to foraging activity in species of the genus Mischocyttarus are scarce and have only been conducted for M. drewseni ( Jeanne 1972), M. labiatus (Litte 1981), M. flavitarsis (Cornelius 1993), M. mastigophorus (O'Donnell 1998), M. cerberus styx (Silva & Noda 2000) and M. consimilis (Montagna et al. 2009). The objective of this study was to analyze the distribution of resources collected by foragers of Mischocyttarus drewseni de Saussure, 1857 in the following aspects: (1) the distribution of food among larvae (small, medium and large), (2) what proportion of the food is divided between the immature and adult females (dominant and subordinate), (3) if the forager shares wood pulp collected with other individuals in the colony and what proportion of pulp is shared among dominant and subordinate indivduals, and (4) in what proportion males receive the resources that arrive in the colony. MATERIAL AND METHODS The field work was carried out at the Unesp – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil (22o24'36"S; 47o33'36"W 137 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni and an average altitude of 612 meters), in a population of M. drewseni. Data were obtained from 21 colonies in the pre-and post-emergence stages for 189 hours of observation. At the onset of the experiment, the colonies were found, identified and mapped to verify the number of cells, immature (eggs, larvae and pupae) and adults, and find out the colony stage of development. Next, in order to identify the behavioral roles of each individual (dominant, subordinate and male) in the colony and their foraging habits, the wasps were collected, marked and then returned to the nest. The mark was made on the mesosoma with a ceramic paint pen. Regarding the size of the larvae, the terminolog y described by Giannotti & Trevisoli (1993) was adapted for this study: SL - Small larvae (L1 and L2 in Giannotti & Trevisoli, 1993): the ventral lobes of the first abdominal segment are not evident; ML - Medium larvae (L3 and L4 in Giannotti & Trevisoli, 1993): ventral lobes of the first abdominal segment are small; LL - Large larvae (L5 in Giannotti & Trevisoli, 1993): ventral lobes of the first abdominal segment are fully developed. The identification of the collected material was made by observing the behavior of individuals in the colony (Silva & Noda 2000), as follows: Nectar foraging: was considered to be when the wasp arrived at the nest with liquid food stored in its crop and performed adult-adult or adult-larva trophallaxis. Prey foraging: was noted when the wasp arrived with a solid mass held in its mouthparts. In this case, the wasp might chew the food itself or share it with another wasp, and then offer this macerated protein to the larvae. Pulp foraging: the collection of construction material was characterized by the arrival at the nest with a solid dark mass. This material was chewed and incorporated into the cells of the nest. Water foraging: was noted when the liquid was deposited directly on the walls of the nest cells, without contact with another wasp. Unfruitful foraging: collections were considered unfruitful, when the wasp returned without any apparent material, not performing trophallaxis or depositing any substance in the nest. After the foragers' arrival, the distribution of the collected material be- tween the individuals of the nest was observed and more than one distribu- 138 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 tion type was recorded if it occurred in a single collection. During nectar or prey distribution among larvae, the frequency of each larva (small, medium or large) receiving such food was quantified. The sum of all data collected from the colonies and the results were compiled by dividing the number of receipts for each size of larvae by the total number of larvae of the same size. This method enabled comparisons between colonies with different amounts and sizes of larvae, as follows: Average distribution to SL = times that each SL received food/total number of SL. Average distribution to ML = times that each ML received food/total number of ML. Average distribution to LL = times that each LL received food/ total number of LL. The Kruskal-Wallis test (p ≤ 0.05) was used to verify the significance of these differences, if samples represented only casual variations, and whether the distribution of nectar and prey is different for each size of larva. In order to quantify the food distribution between larvae, dominant fe- males and subordinate females, it was checked how much each group received for each of the journeys made by the forager. Next, an average per hour of observation and the proportion of each group of individuals receiving food was calculated. When the forager returned to the nest with wood pulp, it was observed whether it was directly added to cells or shared with other adults, and the average time the forager stayed with the material and shared with dominant and subordinates was calculated. The food sharing between females and males was also quantified by calculating the relative frequency of times that males received nectar or prey. RESULTS Food distribution among small, medium and large larvae According to Fig. 1, the mean values show that large larvae received more nectar (Fig. 1A) (average of 2.25 times for each trip) and prey (Fig. 1B) (mean 2.13 times for each trip) than the others The medium larvae received nectar 1.76 times for each trip, and the small larvae 1.03 times; while, the small lar- vae received prey more often (average of 1.68 times) than the medium larvae 139 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni Fig. 1. Pattern of division of nectar (A) and prey (B) among small larvae (SL), medium larvae (ML) and large larvae (LL). 140 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 (average of 1.34 times). Nevertheless, statistical results (Kruskal-Wallis test) showed that these differences are not significant, nor was the distribution of nectar (H = 3.6778, p = 0.1590, N = 195) or for distribution of prey (H = 5.3493, p = 0.0689, N = 83). Food distribution among immature (larvae) and adult females (dominant and subordinate) As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the distribution of food between immature and adults females of the colonies was differentiated. Of the arrivals with nectar, 95.90% were distributed to larvae, 3.57% to dominant individuals and 0.54% to subordinates. On the instances where prey was brought to the colonies, 95.94% were delivered to the larvae, regardless of the size, 2.54% were given to the dominant adults and 1.42% to the subordinates The larvae received nectar 15.58 times per hour, the dominants 0.58 and subordinates 0.09. Regarding the prey collection, larvae received the macerate an average of 28.63 times per hour, the dominant adults 0.76 times and subordinates 0.42. Wood pulp distribution among adult females (foragers, dominant and subordinate) Out of 42 arrivals with wood pulp (Table 3), the dominant individuals received 33.33%, representing a value clearly higher than that for the subor- dinates, which received only 2.38% of the total, while 64.29% stayed with the foragers. From an average of 1.79 collections of pulp per hour, 1.17 were directly deposited in the cell by the foragers, while 0.58 were delivered to the dominant adults and 0.04 to the subordinates. Food distribution among males and females Males were restless with the arrivals of the foragers in the colony. On occa- sion one to three males investigated the female who had just arrived from the field and often took the foraged material, either nectar or prey. From a total of 85 arrivals of nectar, which was divided only among adults, 47 (55.3%) were given to female adults, subordinate or dominant, and 38 (44.7%) were divided between males. Males received 11.5% of all prey that were brought to the colonies, and of seven total instances where males received the prey, three (42.8%) were partially delivered and four (57.2%) were given whole (Table 4). 141 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni DISCUSSION Foragers of M. drewseni appear to perform an unequal distribution of food in the act of feeding the larvae, providing greater amounts of nectar and prey for larger larvae, although this difference is not statistically significant. This result is clear from Fig. 1, and corroborates with the data observed by Kudô Table 1. Distribution of nectar among larvae and adult females (dominant and subordinate). Nectar Larvae Dominant Subordinate Total 1075 40 6 Average/Hour 15.58 0.58 0.09 Standard deviation 12.47 0.79 0.28 Percentage 95.90% 3.57% 0.54% Table 2. Distribution of prey among larvae and adult females (dominant and subordinate). Prey Larvae Dominant Subordinate Total 945 25 14 Average /Hour 28.63 0.76 0.42 Standard deviation 60.32 0.67 1.15 Percentage 95.94% 2.54% 1.42% Table 3. Distribution of wood pulp among foragers (dominant and subordinate). Wood pulp Foragers Dominant Subordinate Total 27 14 1 Average/Hour 1.17 0.58 0.04 Standard deviation 1.00 1.06 0.20 Percentage 64.29% 33.33% 2.38% Table 4. Distribution of nectar and prey among males and females of M. drewseni, specifying the number of occurrences (n) and the relative frequency (%). Adults Nectar Prey n % n % Females 47 55.3 54 88.5 Males 38 44.7 7 11.5 Total 85 100 61 100 142 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 (1998) in colonies of Polistes chinensis where this difference was attributed to the fact that large larvae require more food than small larvae. In M. labiatus adult prefer to feed large larvae and have a tendency to concentrate their feeding efforts on one larva at a time (Litte 1981). Larval development time depends on feeding rates in social insects (Wilson 1971). Therefore, both in colonies with lone-foundresses and colonies with multi- foundress, the older larvae are always given priority over the younger larvae and these older larvae pupate considerably earlier than the others present in the nests (Litte 1981). This conclusion has been demonstrated during the pre-emergence phases of colonies of M. drewseni when the mean duration of the first larvae appearance is less than that of later-appearing larvae ( Jeanne 1972), suggesting that in this species, feeding efforts are also concentrated on the first emerging larvae. Moreover, the better fed larva has more chance to be the reproductive female of the colony, so the differential distribution of food among larvae may be related to caste determination (Rossi & Hunt 1988; Hunt 1991; Gadagkar et al. 1988; Gadagkar et al. 1991). Regarding the distribution of collected resources among individuals of the colony, it was found that most of the food is directed to larvae and distribu- tion of supply among adults follows a hierarchy, with the dominants receiving more than the subordinates. The high rate of larva-adult trophallaxis in this study may be related to the attraction of adults by larval salivary secretions, which may have been the reason for the evolution of social wasp species in a context of trophal- laxis as mutual exchange of food (Roubaud 1916). Reproductive maturation and capacity of oviposition appear to be influenced by larval trophallaxis, mainly in those species of primitive social wasps, in which morphological differences between reproductive and worker castes do not exist (Gadagkar 1991). Thus, food offered by the foragers to the larvae does not appear to be a purely altruistic act, since the females who collected and distributed the food to immatures will also be favored. It was found that the foragers of M. drewseni obey a hierarchy in the distribution of resources among females that remain in the colony, and the dominant adults have advantages over the subordinates at the time of division of nectar, pulp and prey, supporting the hypothesis of Jeanne (1972). Foloni 143 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni & Giannotti (1998) quantified the number of transfers of regurgitated liq- uid from an adult female of M. drewseni to another, and noted that there is a significant difference between dominants and subordinates, so that queens spend 1.60% of their time getting food, while the workers 0.34%. Studies on Polistes metricus confirm this hypothesis because they claim there is a division of labor among individuals, finding that the queens stay in the nest most of the time and their journeys are of short duration (Gamboa et al. 1978). Noda et al. (2001) found that the material collected by foragers of M. cerberus styx delivered to another female is an act of submission and stated that the species has a well-defined hierarchy. Similarly, Costa-Filho et al. (2011) observed that queens of M. cerberus styx spends most of their time in the comb while intermediate females perform high frequencies of cell inspection and gaster rubbing ; however, they also forage and the workers or foragers spend most of their time in the field collecting. Knowing that queens need food, both for survival and for development of the ovarioles, and present no foraging behavior, it becomes clear why they receive more food than subordinates (Gamboa et al. 1978) The distribution of pulp was also distinguished, and probably beyond the reproductive function. The dominant individuals of the colonies observed in this work are likely responsible for building and increase of cells in the nest, since the dominant females received a higher percentage of pulp when compared with the subordinates. In Polistes, the dominant females initiate the construction of most cells and perform oviposition soon after (West- Eberhard 1969; Pratte 1989), as observed in colonies of P. lanio in the pre- emergence stage, when the only activity performed by the dominant females was collecting wood pulp to start new cells and then laying eggs (Giannotti & Machado 1999). In the same way the dominants of M. cerberus styx forage for pulp at a higher rate than the workers (3.1% and 0.3% respectively, Gian- notti 1999), and in Mischocyttarus mastigophorus the wood pulp loads were never shared with nest mates, while food loads, especially insect prey, were often partitioned with other wasps (O’Donnell 1998). This behavior may explain why a large percentage of pulp is shared with females of the highest hierarchical position. Males received food from foragers, corroborating the findings by Jeanne (1972), who also worked with M. drewseni and noted that these individuals 144 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 requested prey as soon as foragers arrive at the nest. Often the request of the food is aggressive, as was observed in males of M. mastigophorus, which do not forage, but through aggressive behavior, solicit and consume part of the food brought by foragers, representing a considerable energ y cost to the colony (O’Donnell 1999). Jeanne (1972) suggested that larval feeding by males of M. drewseni is associated with the removal of liquid protein, since the macerate of prey be- comes smaller when chewed by a male and in one case the portion was totally dropped and was not distributed among the immatures after macerating. Makino (1993), observing Polistes jadwigae, stated that from the total of 27 prey, that males received four which were completely discarded after chew- ing. According to the author these observations indicate that larval feeding by Polistinae males is minimal, because they ingest a significant portion of the food themselves during this process. Unlike the cases noted above, males of M. latior display participation in the colony activities and, in contrast to other studies, males have been observed foraging nectar, prey and water (Cecílio 1999). In general, it may be concluded that the fact that foragers of M. drewseni leave the nest and go out to the field in search of resources for individuals who are not their offspring is certainly an altruistic behavior, because it involves high energ y cost and risk of predation. Nevertheless, considering the theory of mutualism, when adult-larva trophallaxis occurs there is reciprocity on the part of the larvae in relation to foragers, featuring reciprocal altruism, which is reflected in the preference to feed larger larvae that solicit more food and probably produce more salivary secretion. Also, the distribution of resources among adults of M. drewseni has an important role in determining and maintaining the dominance hierarchy of the colony. As in M. mastigophorus, dominant individuals foraged for food (nectar and prey) at lower rates than subordinate individuals. In contrast, dominant wasps performed most of the foraging for the wood pulp used in nest construction (O’Donnell 1998). Dominant individuals on the nest were more likely to take food from arriv- ing foragers than subordinate individuals. Nestmates can compete for access to loads of food provided by foragers for personal consumption. Control of food materials influences individual physiolog y (Hunt 1991), as well as that of the developing brood (Markiewicz & O’Donnell 2001). Wasps may also 145 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni compete to control the processing of building material loads. The ability to monopolize building materials allows individuals to regulate nest growth. In addition, it is possible to note that males can participate passively in the activities of the colony, just receiving the food brought by foragers, or actively, distributing food to the larvae or possibly foraging. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for financial support. REFERENCES Carpenter, J.M. & O.M. Marques. 2001. Contribuição ao Estudo dos Vespídeos do Brasil (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Vespoidea, Vespidae) [CD-ROM]. Cruz das Almas – BA, Brasil: Universidade Federal da Bahia. UFB. Mestrado em Ciências Agrárias. Série Publicações Digitais 2. Cecílio, D.S.S. 1999. Bionomia e organização social de Mischocyttarus (Kappa) latior (Fox, 1898) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP. 73p. Cornelius, M.L. 1993. Influence of caterpillar-feeding damage on the foraging behaviour of the paper wasp Mischocyttarus flavitarsis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Jornal Insect Behaviour 6(6): 771-781. Costa Filho, V.C., S.N. Shima, I.C. Desuó & A.S.N. Murakami. 2011. The effects of the social hierarchy destabilization on the foraging activity of eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus cerberus styx Richards, 1940 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae). Psyche 2011, Article ID 501381. 8p. Cruz, J.D., E. Giannotti, G.M.M. Santos, C.C. Bichara-Filho & A.A. Rocha. 2006. Nest site selection and flying capacity of netropical wasp Angiopolybia pallens (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in the atlantic rain forest, Bahia State, Brazil. Sociobiolog y 47(3): 739-749. Foloni, I.B. & E. Giannotti. 1998. Divisão de trabalho de Mischocyttarus drewseni (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Anais do XVI Encontro Anual de Etologia. São Paulo, Sociedade Brasileira de Etologia. p.143. Gadagkar, R. 1991. Belonogaster, Mischocyttarus, Parapolybia and independent-founding Ropalidia. p.149-190. In: K.G. Ross & R.W. Matthews (eds). The social biolog y of wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 696p. Gadagkar, R., C. Vinutha, A. Shanubhogue & A. P. Gore. 1988. Pré-imaginal biasing of caste in a primitively eusocial insect. Proceeding of Royal Society of London 233: 175-189. Gadagkar, R., S. Bhagavan, K. Chandrashekara & C. Vinutha. 1991. The role of larval nutrition in pre-imaginal biasing of caste in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ecological Entomolog y 16: 435-440. 146 Sociobiolog y Vol. 59, No. 1, 2012 Gamboa, G.J., B.D. Heacock & S.L. Wiltjer. 1978. Division of labor and subordinate longevity in foundress associations of the paper wasp, Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 51(3): 343-352. Giannotti, E. & C. Trevisoli. 1993. Desenvolvimento pós-embrionário de Mischocyttarus drewseni Saussure, 1857 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insecta 2(2): 41-52. Giannotti, E. & V.L.L. Machado. 1999. Behavioral castes in the primitively eusocial wasp Polistes lanio (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 43(3-4): 185-190. Giannotti, E. 1999. Social organization of the eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus cerberus styx (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Sociobiolog y 33: 325-338. Hunt, J.H. 1991. Nourishment and the evolution of the social Vespidae. p. 426-450. In: Ross, K.G. & Matthews, R.W. (Eds). The social biolog y of wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 696p. Jeanne, R.L. 1972. Social biolog y of the Neotropical Wasp Mischocytarus drewseni. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoolog y 144(3): 1550-1563. Jeanne, R.L. 1986. The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monitore Zoologico Italiano 20: 119-133. Kudô, K. 1998. High efficiency of prey foraging achieved by frequent foraging for saw fly larvae by the foudresses of Polistes chinensis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomological Science 1(3): 341-345. Litte, M. 1981. Social biolog y of the polistine wasp Mischocyttarus labiatus: survival in a Colombian rain forest. Smithsonian Contributions of Zoolog y 327: 1–27. Makino, S. 1993. Sexual differences in larval feeding behavior in a paper wasps, Polistes jadwigae (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Journal of Etholog y 11: 73-75. Markiewicz, D.A. & S. O’Donnell. 2001. Social dominance, task performance and nutrition: implications for reproduction in eusocial wasps. Journal of Comparative Physiolog y A-Neuroetholog y Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiolog y 187: 327-333. Montagna, T.S., V.O. Torres, C.C. Dutra, Y.R. Súarez, W.F. Antonialli-Junior & V.V. Alver- Junior. 2009. Study of the foraging activity of Mischocyttarus consimilis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Sociobiolog y 53(1): 131-140. Murakami, A.S.N. 2007. Diferenciação etológica e morfofisiológica das castas de Mischocyyttarus (Monocyttarus) cassununga Von Ihering, 1903 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Mischocyttarini), com especial referência às fêmeas hierarquicamente superiores. Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo. 194p. Noda, S.C.M., E.R. Silva & E. Giannotti. 2001. Dominance hierarchy in different stages of development in colonies of the primitively eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus cerberus styx. Sociobiolog y 38(3B): 603-613. O’Donnell, S. 1999. The function of males dominance in the eusocial wasp, Mischocyttarus mastigophorus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Etholog y 105: 273-282. O’Donnell, S. 1998. Dominance and polyethism in the eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus mastigophorus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behavioral Ecolog y and Sociobiolog y 43(4): 327–331. 147 da Silva, E.R. et al. — Distribution of Resources by M. drewseni Pratte, M. 1989. Foundress association in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus Christ (Hymenoptera Vespidae), effects of dominance hierarchy on the division of labor. Behaviour 111(1-4): 208-219. Richards, O.W. 1978. The social wasps of the Americas excluding the Vespinae. London: British Museum (Natural History). 580p. Rocha, A.A. & E. Giannotti. 2007. Foraging activity of Protopolybia exigua (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in different phases of the colony cycle, at an area in the region of the Médio São Francisco River, Bahia, Brazil. Sociobiolog y 50: 813-831. Rossi, A.M. & J.H. Hunt. 1988. Honey supplementation and its developmental consequences: evidence for food limitation in a paper wasp, Polistes metricus. Ecological Entomolog y 13: 437-442. Roubaud, E. 1916. Recherches biologiques sur les guêpes solitaries ts sociales d’Afrique. La genese de la vie sociale et l’evolution de l’instinct maternel chez les Vespides. Annales des Sciences Naturelles-Zoologie et Biologie Animale 1: 1-160. Silva, E.R. & S.C.M. Noda. 2000. Aspectos da atividade forrageadora de Mischocyttarus cerberus styx Richards, 1940 (Hymenoptera, Vespidade): duração das viagens, especialização individual e ritmos diário e sazonal. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências 2(1): 7-20. Silveira, O.T. 2008. Phylogeny of wasps of the genus Mischocyttarus de Saussure (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Polistinae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 510-549. Smith, E.F. 2005. Ecolog y and social biolog y of the paper wasp Mischocyttarus collarellus in a neotropical rain forest (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas, USA. 204p. Sugden, S. & R.L. Mcallen. 1994. Observations on foraging, population and nest biolog y of the Mexican honey wasp, Brachygastra mellifica (Say) in Texas (Vespidae: Polybiinae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 67(2): 141-155. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1969. The social biolog y of Polistinae wasps. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoolog y University of Michigan 140: 1-101. Wilson, E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Belknap press. 548p.