225

Genetic Divergence of Turkish Apis mellifera Subspecies Based 
on Sequencing of ND5 Mitochondrial Segment

by

Fulya Özdil1*& Fatma İlhan1

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation can be used to infer honey bee 
evolutionary relationships. In this study, DNA sequence diversity in the ND5 
region of the mitochondrial genome was investigated in 93 samples of Apis 
mellifera from 15 different populations in Turkey. Five novel haplotypes were 
revealed for the ND5 gene segment of Turkish honeybees. The number of 
variable sites found was 6 for this region while 2 were parsimony informative 
sites. The average pairwise genetic distances were 0.3% for ND5 gene. In this 
study, the NJ tree of ND5 gene segment were constructed with the published 
sequences of Apis mellifera haplotypes. This study expands the knowledge 
about the mitochondrial ND5 region in Apis mellifera and it is also the first 
comprehensive sequencing analysis of ND5 region in Turkish honeybees.  

Key words: Apis mellifera L., DNA sequence diversity, ND5, Turkey

INTRODUCTION

The honey bee, Apis mellifera L., occurs naturally in Europe, the Middle 
East and Africa (Ruttner 1988). From morphometric and molecular studies, 
the 29 subspecies of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L., are grouped into five 
evolutionary lineages: M from northern and western Europe and northern 
Africa, A from southern and central Africa, C from the northern Mediter-
ranean region and eastern Europe, O from the eastern Mediterranean and 
the Near and Middle East region, and Y from the east African country of 
Ethiopia (Ruttner 1988; Hall and Smith 1991; Garnery et al. 1992; Arias and 
Sheppard 1996; Kauhausen-Keller et al. 1997; Franck et al. 2000, 2001).

1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
*Corresponding author: fulyaozdil@selcuk.edu.tr
The department where the study was conducted:
Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Major of Biometry & Genetics, 42075 Konya-Turkey



226  Sociobiolog y Vol. 59,  No. 1, 2012

Based on morphometrics, the Near Eastern subspecies, Anatolian (A. m. 
anatoliaca), Caucasian (A. m. caucasica) and Iranian (A. m. meda), had been 
grouped within the O branch (Ruttner 1988; Kauhausen-Keller et al. 1997), 
however mtDNA analysis showed that they belonged to the C lineage (Smith 
et al. 1997; Palmer et al. 2000; Franck et al. 2000, 2001; Kandemir et al. 2006; 
Özdil et al. 2009a, 2009b; Bouga et al. 2011). Ruttner’s (1988) morphometric 
analyses concluded that A. m. anatoliaca, A. m. caucasica and A. m. meda exist 
in Turkey. Nearly all of Turkey is occupied by A. m. anatoliaca. A. m. caucasica 
is found in the northeastern part of Turkey and A. m. meda is found in the 
southeastern part of Turkey. Recently, the mitochondrial studies of Turkish 
honeybees had also shown that A. m. carnica is found in the European part 
of Turkey called Thrace (Palmer et al. 2000) and A. m. syriaca is found in the 
south part of the country near the Hatay region (Kandemir et al. 2006). 

The mitochondrial genome has been a useful molecule for population 
genetic studies of Apis mellifera L. Length and sequence variations within 
the mitochondrial genome of honeybees have been particularly useful in dif-
ferentiating evolutionary lineages and groups of subspecies (Hall and Smith 
1991; Garnery et al. 1992, 1993; Franck et al. 2000; Palmer et al. 2000). 
Apis mellifera ligustica was the first Hymenopteran subspecies for which 
the whole mitochondrial genome has been sequenced (Crozier and Crozier 
1993). To date, many mitochondrial regions, of which the tRNAleu-COII 
region (formerly COI-COII intergenic region) (Garnery et al. 1992, 1993; 
Franck et al. 2000; De la Rua et al.2001, 2004; Palmer et al. 2000, Sušnik et 
al. 2004; Kozmus et al. 2007; Muňoz et al. 2009; Nedić et al. 2009; Özdil et 
al. 2009a; Magnus and Szalanski 2010; Szalanski and Magnus 2010) was the 
first, have been sequenced and phylogenetic relationships among Apis mellfera 
subspecies has been described. But we still have little knowledge about the 
other mitochondrial regions. The ND5 gene segment was first sequenced in 
Greek honeybees and this is the only study of the phylogenetic relationships 
among East European subspecies (Martimianakis et al. 2011). 

The objective of this research was to determine the genetic diversity and 
phylogenetic relationships of Apis mellifera subspecies of Turkey as deter-
mined by sequencing of ND5 gene segment. Length variations and nucleotide 
substitutions found in this gene segment were compared with the other 
mitochondrial surveys and such results could be also useful in determining 
the genetic structure of honey bees.



227 Özdil, F. &  İlhan, F. - Genetic Divergence of Turkish Honeybees

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and DNA extraction
A total of 93 honey bees each representing a different colony was collected 

from 15 widespread locations in Turkey (Fig. 1, Table 1). Workers were col-
lected in 95% ethanol and subsequently air-dried. Total DNA was extracted 
from each bee’s thorax according to Hall (1990). The concentration and 
purification of genomic DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 
spectrophotometer, and 20 ng of genomic DNA was used for the PCR. 

Sequence Analysis
The ND5 mitochondrial gene segment was amplified according to Bouga 

et al. (2005). The PCR products were purified using a gel purification kit 
(QIAGEN) and sequenced in both directions on an ABI Prism 3130 auto-
mated sequencer (Applied Biosystems) using standard protocols. Sequences 
were aligned with the computer program Clustal X (Thompson et al. 1997). 
For estimates of the similarity index and evolutionary divergence between 
DNA sequences MEGA5 Software was used. Resulting in a consensus of the 
phylogenetic tree, the methods of Maximum Parsi mony (MP) and Neighbor-Joining 
(NJ) analysis were performed using the same software (Tamura et al. 2011).

Fig. 1. Sampling locations in Turkey. Number in parenthesis show the number of colonies sequenced 
at each site. 



228  Sociobiolog y Vol. 59,  No. 1, 2012

For the construction of the phylogenetic trees, we used Apis cerena (acces-
sion number: NC_014295) sequences retrieved from Genbank, as outgroup 
in order to root the trees. The sequences obtained in this study have been 
deposited to Genbank with accession numbers JN410833 to JN410837. 
The resulting sequences were compared to published sequences available in 
Genbank. 

RESULTS

The sizes of the PCR-amplified ND5 segment for all populations studied 
were found to be 782 bp (primers excluded). Five novel haplotypes were 
revealed for the ND5 gene segment in Turkish honeybees. The number of 
variable sites was found to be 6 for this region 2 of which were parsimony 
informative sites. The average pairwise genetic distances were 0.3% for ND5 
gene (Kimura 1980). 

Table 2 lists the different haplotypes of the ND5 gene found in this study 
and in Martimianakis et al. 2011. The sequence information, Genbank ac-
cession numbers and variable sites of these haplotypes and additional new 

Table 1. Sampling localities, geographical positions and number of colonies used for 
sequencing.

Locations
Abbreviation of 

the locations
Geographical position

#  Colonies Analyzed
for sequence analysis

ADIYAMAN ADI 37°46'N 38°16'E 7

ARDAHAN ARD 41°03'N 42°42'E 6

ANKARA / KAZAN KAZ 39°58'N 32°52'E 6

ANKARA /AUZ* AUZ 40°12'N 32°41'E 6

ANTALYA / ELMALI ELM 36°44'N 29°56'E 8

BALIKESIR BAL 39°39'N 27°53'E 5

BINGÖL BIN 39°00'N 40°41'E 6

BOLU / YIĞILCA BOL 40°58'N 31°27'E 6

HAKKARI HAK 37°35'N 43°34'E 6

KONYA / AKÖREN AKO 37°27'N 32°22'E 5

KONYA / SELÇUKLU SEL 37°57'N 32°26'E 6

KONYA / SIZMA SIZ 38°05'N 32°24'E 8

KONYA / SUZ ** SUZ 38°02'N 32°30'E 6

MUŞ / VARTO MUS 39°17'N 41°12'E 6

VAN / GEVAŞ VAN 38°18'N 43°06'E 6

 *AUZ: The Apiary of the Ankara University 
**SUZ: The Apiary of the Selçuk University



229 Özdil, F. &  İlhan, F. - Genetic Divergence of Turkish Honeybees

haplotypes that are found in this study are summarized in Table 2. The mtDNA 
nucleotide positions are taken from Crozier and Crozier (1993). 

The trees drawn by Maximum Parsimony and Neighbor-Joining analysis 
exhibited nearly the same topolog y for ND5 mtDNA region so only the NJ 
tree is presented here. At population level, sequencing of ND5 mitochon-
drial region has been studied less than the other mitochondrial regions. 
Only Martimianakis et al., (2011) gives information about sequencing of 
this region in samples from Greece and some East European Countries. The 
phylogenetic tree of Greek and Turkish honey bee haplotypes constructed 
by the NJ method is shown in Fig. 2.   

DISCUSSION
Several mitochondrial studies of Turkish honey bee populations have been 

conducted (Smith et al. 1997; Palmer et al. 2000; Kandemir et al. 2006, Özdil 
et al. 2009a). With restriction digests, nearly all Turkish colonies analyzed 
previously by the other surveys were found to belong to the C Mediterranean 

Fig. 2. Neighbour-Joining  dendogram based on ND5 sequences of Apis mellifera haplotypes. Sequences 
obtained in this study are written in capital letters.



230  Sociobiolog y Vol. 59,  No. 1, 2012

Ta
bl

e 
2.

 H
ap

lo
ty

pe
s, 

G
en

ba
nk

 a
cc

es
si

on
 n

um
be

rs
 a

nd
 v

ar
ia

bl
e 

si
te

s o
f t

he
 N

D
5 

re
gi

on
 o

f A
pi

s m
el

lif
er

a 
L

. Th
e 

va
ri

ab
le

 si
te

s t
ha

t a
re

 fo
un

d 
in

 th
is

 st
ud

y 
ar

e 
in

di
ca

te
d 

in
 b

ol
d 

nu
m

be
rs

.

M
tD

N
A

 n
uc

le
ot

id
e 

po
si

tio
ns

7425**

7636

7697**

7777

7830

7968

7991**

8006

8011

8019

8026

8088

8089

8095**

H
ap

lo
ty

pe
s/

R
ef

er
en

ce
G

en
B

an
k 

A
cc

es
si

on
 

N
um

be
rs

C
ro

zi
er

 a
nd

 C
ro

zi
er

 1
99

3
N

C
_0

01
56

61
T

C
A

T
C

A
G

G
C

T
C

C
C

T

M
ar

tim
ia

na
ki

s  
et

 a
l. 

20
11

G
U

06
04

66
2

*
·

·
·

A
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

67
2

*
·

·
·

A
G

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

68
2

*
·

·
·

A
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

69
3

*
·

·
·

A
·

·
A

·
·

·
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

70
3

*
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

G
U

06
04

71
3

*
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

72
3

*
·

·
A

A
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

G
U

06
04

73
3

*
T

·
·

A
·

·
·

T
C

T
T

T
·

N
ew

 –
 A

N
A

T
O

1
JN

41
08

33
4

A
·

·
·

A
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

N
ew

 –
 A

N
A

T
O

2
JN

41
08

34
4

·
·

T
·

A
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

N
ew

 –
 A

N
A

T
O

3
JN

41
08

35
4

·
·

·
·

A
C

·
·

·
·

·
T

·
N

ew
 –

 C
A

U
C

A
1

JN
41

08
36

4
·

·
·

·
A

·
·

·
·

·
·

·
T

G
N

ew
 –

 M
E

D
A

1
JN

41
08

37
4

·
·

·
·

A
·

·
·

·
·

·
·

T
·

1 
N

C
_0

01
56

6:
 1

63
43

 b
p 

of
 A

pi
s m

el
lif

er
a 

lig
us

tic
a 

co
m

pl
et

e 
m

it
oc

ho
nd

ri
al

 g
en

om
e.

2  
G

U
06

04
66

-G
U

06
04

68
: 5

53
 b

p 
of

 N
D

5 
ge

ne
 (

ba
se

s 
fr

om
 7

59
5 

to
 8

14
7)

; 3
 

G
U

06
04

69
-G

U
06

04
73

: 6
87

 b
p 

of
 N

D
5 

ge
ne

 (b
as

es
 fr

om
 7

46
1 

to
 8

14
7)

; 4
 7

82
 b

p 
of

 N
D

5 
ge

ne
 (b

as
es

 fr
om

 7
41

6 
to

 8
19

7)
 o

f T
ur

ki
sh

 h
on

ey
 b

ee
s f

ou
nd

 in
 th

is
 st

ud
y. 

· i
nd

ic
at

es
 id

en
tic

al
 n

uc
le

ot
id

es
 a

t t
ha

t s
it

e.
 * 

m
ea

ns
 th

er
e 

is
 n

o 
se

qu
en

ce
 in

fo
rm

at
io

n 
at

 th
at

 si
te

 o
f t

he
 h

ap
lo

ty
pe

. *
* V

ar
ia

bl
e 

si
te

s t
ha

t a
re

 n
ew

ly
 fo

un
d 

in
 th

is
 st

ud
y 

ar
e 

in
di

ca
te

d 
in

 b
ol

d 
nu

m
be

rs
.  

   
   

  



231 Özdil, F. &  İlhan, F. - Genetic Divergence of Turkish Honeybees

lineage. This finding was expected because the Turkish populations consist 
mainly of A. m. anatoliaca, A. m. caucasica and A. m. meda.  

Previously, we had shown the phylogenetic relationships and PCR-RFLP 
profile of Turkish honey bees using several restriction enzymes in both the 
mitochondrial and nuclear genome of Apis mellifera (Özdil et al. 2009, 2011). 
In this study we presented a comprehensive sequencing analysis of the ND5 
mitochondrial gene segment to verify genetic divergence in Turkish honey 
bee populations. We found five different haplotypes for the ND5 gene seg-
ment.

Sequencing of the ND5 mitochondrial region has been studied less than 
the other mitochondrial regions. Only eight different haplotypes of Apis mel-
lifera were reported in this region. Here we added five new haplotypes in this 
study (Table 2). Three came from the Anatolian geographical locations, one 
from each Iranian and Caucasian geographical location. While ANATO1 
( JN410833) haplotype was only obtained in some of the honeybees from 
SIZ population, ANATO2 ( JN410834) was found in both SIZ and ELM 
populations. These two haplotypes were found to be the rarest Anatolian 
haplotypes whereas ANATO3 ( JN410835) haplotype was found in a wide 
geographical area such as BAL, BOL, AKO, SEL and SUZ. Caucasian 
haplotype, CAUCA1 ( JN410836), was obtained from ARD, KAZ and 
AUZ where ARD was the center of Caucasian honey bees. And MEDA1 
( JN410837) haplotype was found in honey bees from the South-East part 
of Turkey where mostly A. m. meda is found.

The base substitutions at position 7830 (C→A) and 8089 (C→T) which were 
reported in Martimianakis et al. (2011), were observed in all of the Turkish 
honeybees in this study. The NJ dendogram (Fig. 2) based on ND5 sequences 
of the two surveys showed that that these races cannot be discriminated 
from each other since all of them belong to East European (C) lineage. But 
it is seen that Haplotype 1-4 (Genbank records: GU060466-GU060469) 
in Martimianakis et al. (2011) and the haplotypes that are found in Turkish 
honeybees are much closer than the other haplotypes.

In addition to previous findings of the ND5 gene, here we reported se-
quencing of this mitochondrial DNA gene segment in Turkish honey bees 
and compared these results with other East European races. Our data showed 



232  Sociobiolog y Vol. 59,  No. 1, 2012

that samples from SIZ (Konya/Sızma) and ARD (Ardahan), having unique 
haplotypes, maintain their native origin and they might be pure A. m. Ana-
toliaca and A. m. caucasica, respectively. High migratory beekeeping activity 
and the use of Caucasian queens for queen rearing in Turkey have resulted in 
the loss of genetic diversity. So it is highly important to identify the genetic 
structure of local honey bee races and improve strategies to conserve them 
in their areas. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Saim BOZTEPE, (Selçuk Uni-
versity, Faculty of Agriculture) and Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali YILDIZ (Ankara 
University, Faculty of Agriculture) for providing insight and guidance during 
various phases of this project. The authors also would like to thank Hüseyin 
BAYIR for help in collecting samples from central region of Turkey. 

REFERENCES
Arias, M.C. & W.S. Sheppard 1996. Molecular phylogenetics of honey bee subspecies (Apis 

mellifera L.) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence. Molecular Phylogenetics 
and Evolution 5: 557–566.

Bouga, M., P.C. Harizanis, G. Kilias & S. Alahiotis 2005. Genetic divergence and phylogenetic 
relationships of honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) populations from 
Greece and Cyprus using PCR-RFLP analysis of three mtDNA segments. Apidologie 
36: 335–344. 

Bouga, M., C. Alaux, M. Bienkowska, R. Büchler, N.L. Carreck, E. Cauia, R. Chlebo, 
B. Dahle, R. Dall’olio, P. De La Rúa, A.  Gregorc, E. Ivanova, A. Kence, M. Kence, 
N. Kezic, H. Kiprijanovska, P. Kozmus, P. Kryger, Y. Le Conte, M. Lodesani, A. M. 
Murilhas, A. Siceanu, G. Soland, A. Uzunov & J. Wilde 2011. A review of methods for 
discrimination of honey bee populations as applied to European beekeeping. Journal 
of Apicultural Research 50(1): 51-84. 

Crozier, R.H. & Y.C. Crozier 1993. The mitochondrial genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera: 
complete sequence and genome organization. Genetics 133: 97–117.

De la Rúa, P., J. Galián, J. Serrano & R.F.A. Moritz 2001. Genetic structure and distinctness 
of Apis mellifera L. populations from the Canary Islands. Molecular Ecolog y 10: 
1733–1742.

De la Rúa, P., R. Hernández-Garcia, B.V. Pedersen, J. Galián & J. Serrano 2004. Molecular 
diversity of honeybee Apis mellifera iberica L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from western 
Andalusia. Archiv Zootec 53: 195–203.

Franck, P., L. Garnery, M. Solignac & J.-M. Cornuet 2000. Molecular confirmation of a 
fourth lineage in honeybees from the near east. Apidologie 31: 167–180.



233 Özdil, F. &  İlhan, F. - Genetic Divergence of Turkish Honeybees

Franck, P., L. Garnery, A. Loiseau, B.P. Oldroyd, H.R. Hepburn, M. Solignac & J.-M. Cornuet 
2001. Genetic diversity of the honeybee in Africa: microsatellite and mitochondrial 
data. Heredity 86: 420–430.

Garnery, L., J.-M. Cornuet & M. Solignac 1992. Evolutionary history of the honey bee Apis 
mellifera inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mol. Ecol. 1: 145–154.

Garnery, L., M. Solignac, G. Celebrano & J.-M. Cornuet 1993. A simple test using restricted 
PCR amplified mitochondrial DNA to study the genetic structure of Apis mellifera. 
Experientia 49: 1016–1021.

Hall, H.G. 1990. Parental analysis of introgressive hybridization between African and 
European honeybees using nuclear DNA RFLPs. Genetics 125: 611–621.

Hall, H.G. & D.R. Smith 1991. Distinguishing African and European honeybee matrilines 
using amplified mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88: 4548–4552.

Kandemir, I., M. Kence, W.S. Sheppard, A. Kence 2006. Mitochondrial DNA variation in 
honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations from Turkey. Journal of Apicultural Research 
and Bee World 45 (1): 33–38.

Kauhausen-Keller, D, F. Ruttner & R . Keller 1997. Morphometric studies on the 
microtaxonomy of the species Apis mellifera L. Apidologie 28: 295–307. 

Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions 
through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 
16: 111–120.

Kozmus, P., J. Stevanović, Z. Stanimirović, V. Stojić, Z. Kulišić & V. Meglič 2007. Analysis 
of mitochondrial DNA in honeybees (Apis mellifera) from Serbia. Acta Vet. 57: 
465–476.

Magnus, R. & A.L. Szalanski 2010. Genetic Evidence for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) of 
Middle Eastern Lineage in the United States. Sociobiolog y 55: 285–296. 

Martimianakis, S., E. Klossa-Kilia, M. Bouga & G. Kilias 2011. Phylogenetic relationships 
of Greek Apis mellifera subspecies based on sequencing of mtDNA segments (COI and 
ND5). Journal of Apicultural Research 50 (1): 42–50.

Muňoz, I., R. Dall’Olio, M. Lodesani & P. De la Rúa 2009. Population genetic structure of 
coastal Croatian honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica). Apidologie 40: 617–626.

Nedić, N., L. Stanisavljević, M. Mladenović, J. Stanisavljević 2009. Molecular characterization 
of the honeybee Apis mellifera carnica in Serbia. Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade 61 (4): 
587–598. 

Özdil ,F., M.A. Yıldız & H.G. Hall 2009a. Molecular Characterization of Turkish Honey 
Bee Populations (Apis mellifera L.) Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA RFLP and 
Sequence Results. Apidologie 40 (5): 570–576.

Özdil, F., B. Fakhri, H. Meydan, M.A. Yıldız & H.G. Hall 2009b. Mitochondrial DNA 
variation in the COI-COII intergenic region among Turkish and Iranian Honey Bees 
(Apis mellifera L.). Biochemical Genetics 47: 717–721. 

Özdil,F., H. Meydan, M.A. Yıldız & H.G. Hall 2011. Genetic Diversity of Turkish Honey 
Bee Populations Based on RFLPs at a Nuclear DNA Locus. Sociobiolog y 58(3): 
719–731. 



234  Sociobiolog y Vol. 59,  No. 1, 2012

Palmer, M.R., D.R. Smith & O. Kaftanoğlu 2000. Turkish honeybees: Genetic variation and 
evidence for a fourth lineage of Apis mellifera mtDNA. J. Hered. 91: 42–46.

Ruttner, F. 1988. Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees.Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 284 
pp.

Smith, D.R., A. Slaymaker, M. Palmer & O. Kaftanoğlu 1997. Turkish honeybees belong to 
the east Mediterranean mitochondrial lineage. Apidologie 28: 269–274.

Sušnik, S., P. Kozmus, J. Poklukar & V. Meglić 2004. Molecular characterization of indigenous 
Apis mellifera carnica in Slovenia. Apidologie 35: 623–636.

Szalanski,A.L. & R.M. Magnus 2010. Mitochondrial DNA characterization of Africanized 
honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations from the USA. Journal of Apicultural Research 
and Bee World 49(2): 177–185. 

Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei & S. Kumar 2011. MEGA5: 
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary 
Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biolog y and Evolution 
28(10): 2731–2739.

Thompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D.G. Higgins 1997. The 
CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment 
aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.