Open access journal: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology ISSN: 0361-6525 DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v63i2.824Sociobiology 63(2): 735-743 (June, 2016) Ant community (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with Callisthene fasciculata (Spr.) Mart. (Vochysiaceae) canopies in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brazil Introduction The forest canopy is responsible for mechanisms that regulate key processes in ecosystems (Basset et al., 2002), such as high primary productivity (Lowman & Nadkarni, 1995). This productivity makes a high variety of resources possible, especially food, for different taxa, including arthropods (Novotny et al., 2002a,b), which represent the most abundant and diverse taxon associated with tropical forest canopies in all regions of the world (Stork & Grimbacher, 2006). In this way, tree canopies are characterized as a diverse environment and of considerable importance due to nutrient cycling processes and the ecological interactions among the species that live in them (Adis, 1997; Adis et al., 2010). Abstract Ants act in different trophic levels and are important due to their abundance, distribution and diversity in a variety of habitats, exercising influence on many different organisms and ecosystems. Thus, this study compared temporal variation on the structure and composition of the ant community in canopies of Callisthene fasciculata (Spr.) Mart. (Vochysiaceae) during high water and dry periods, in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Ant sampling was performed on 12 specimens of C. fasciculata, in 2010 and 2011, using canopy fogging with insecticide, in a total of 120m² of sampled canopy. Altogether, 2,958 ants were collected. The 2,943 adults were distributed in four subfamilies, 12 genus and 26 species. Myrmicinae (18.7 ind./m2) was the most representative taxon, followed by Formicinae (3.2 ind./m2), Dolichoderinae (2.2 ind./m2) and Pseudomyrmecinae (0.3 ind./m2). The community is made up of six trophic groups, in which omnivorous (23.5 ind./m2) were the most prevalent, followed by minimum hypogeical generalists (0.5 ind./m2) and arboreal generalist predators (0.3 ind./m2). Although the results showed that ant community richness, associated to C. fasciculata canopies, does not represent a significant difference among the seasonal periods, there are differences as to species distribution on the host plant over the seasonal periods, indicating the influence of temporal variation, and therefore, habitat conditions on this community. Sociobiology An international journal on social insects L Yamazaki1, J Dambros1, E Meurer2, VF Vindica1, JHC Delabie3, MI Marques2, LD Battirola1 Article History Edited by Kleber Del-Claro, UFU, Brazil Received 14 July 2015 Initial acceptance 01 March 2016 Final acceptance 09 May 2016 Publication date 15 July 2016 Keywords Biodiversity, canopy, temporality, mono- dominance. Corresponding author Lúcia Yamazaki Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Campus Universitário de Sinop Sinop-MT, Brazil E-Mail: lucia_yamazaki_ly@hotmail.com Among the arthropods, Formicidae is an important component of the communities inhabiting the tree layer of tropical forests, using same as habitat, foraging area and nesting (Corrêa et al., 2006). This association also allows plants to benefit because the ants provide materials which are rich in nitrogen, food waste and useful metabolic waste to plants (Delabie et al., 2003), as well as reducing herbivory activity by organisms that feed on these plants, influencing the structuring of the communities in these habitats (Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990). Ants are predators and herbivores which are significant in many habitats, mainly due to their abundance, omnipresence and diversity (Fowler et al., 1990; Kaspari, 2003). In tropical forests, seasonality is a factor that determines the structure of 1 - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop-MT, Brazil 2 - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá-MT, Brazil 3 - Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus-BA, Brazil RESEARCH ARTICLE - ANTS L Yamazaki et al. – Ant community associated with Callisthene fasciculata canopies736 their communities (Simberloff & Dayan, 1991). The majority of the species appear to be opportunistic foragers, feeding on nectar, seeds, leaves and live or dead animals, while some may be specialized in their feeding habits (Kaspari, 2003). Studies carried out in the Pantanal have demonstrated that ants are an important component of the arthropods communities, participating in ecological processes, developing different survival strategies and social behaviors in these areas (Adis et al., 2001; Battirola et al., 2005; Castilho et al., 2007; Santos et al., 2008; Marques et al., 2010, 2011; Soares et al., 2013). Considering the importance of conserving wetlands for the maintenance of biological diversity and the role played by this taxon in food chains associated with these habitats, this study evaluated the temporal variation in the structure and composition of the ant community in the canopy of Callisthene fasciculata (Spr.) Mart. (Vochysiaceae), during periods of high water and dry season in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Material and Methods Study area Samples were collected in the Pantanal of Poconé, specifically on the Fazenda Alvorada (16°26’S and 56°24’W), Porto Cercado Road, in Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brazil. The local climate is characterized as Aw, according to the Köppen classification. This region has well defined seasons, with the rainy season between October and March, and the dry season between April and September, defining its water cycle in four distinct seasonal periods (high water, receding water, dry and rising water) (Heckman, 1998). The samples were obtained in a monodominant, seasonally flooded forest, with predominance of C. fasciculata, locally known as “carvoal”, which can reach 4 to 15m in height when mature and has dark, thick and rough bark (Pott & Pott, 1994). The flowering period is between September and October, occurring together with seed dispersal generated in the previous year (Custódio et al., 2014). It is a tree that is characterized as deciduous and with dormancy absent during the rising water season until the beginning of the dry season, partial dormancy in the dry season until the beginning of the rising water season, and total dormancy at the end of the dry season (Corsini & Guarim-Neto, 2000). Field Procedures Insecticide was applied by way of fogging on 12 C. fasciculata canopies in the high water season (tree numbers 1-6) and in the dry season (tree numbers 7-12), in 2010 and 2011, respectively. In each seasonal period six individual C. fasciculata were randomly selected keeping a minimum distance of 10m between each sample according to Adis et al. (1998) and Battirola et al. (2004). Initially, the entire diameter at the base of these trees was surrounded by nylon funnels (1m² in diameter each), distributed according to the scope and architecture of the canopy, totaling 120m2 of sample area (10m² per sampled tree). At the base of each collecting funnel a plastic bottle collector was installed with 92% alcohol which remained suspended at about 1m from the ground by means of cords tied to surrounding trees. During the high water period funnels were suspended at 1.5m above the soil due to flooding of part of the forest (water depth ranging between 0.1 and 0.3m). The fogging procedure was carried out for ten minutes on each tree, using the synthetic pyrethroid Lambda-Cyhalothrin (Icon®) at 0.5%, diluted in two liters of diesel at a concentration of 1% (20ml), associated with the synergist (DDVP) 0.1% (2ml). The fogging used was the Swingfog SN50 model, which produces a strong jet of smoke that is directed from the ground to all parts of the canopy. These procedures took place, always, around 6:00am when the air circulation is less intense, allowing the insecticide cloud to rise slowly through the canopy and not disperse. In each sampled tree a fogging and a collection took place. The collection was carried out two hours after application of the insecticide, the recommended time for its action on arthropods (Adis et al., 1998), when the walls of the funnels were manually shaken and washed with the aid of sprayers containing alcohol at 92% so that the material could be gathered from the existing collector bottles at the basis of the hoppers. Laboratory Procedures All the material coming from the samples was transported to the Acervo Biológico da Amazônia Meridional (ABAM) of the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop - MT. Here all the ants were quantified and identified according to Fernández (2003a,b) and Bolton (2003, 2014). Then the ants were compared with the reference collection from the Laboratório de Ecologia e Taxonomia de Artrópodes (LETA) of the Instituto de Biociências of the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso in Cuiabá, MT. The determination of trophic guilds was carried out according to Rojas and Fragoso (2000), Silvestre et al. (2003) and Brandão et al. (2009) and the material is deposited in the ABAM/UFMT/Sinop Entomological Collection. Data Analysis The estimate for species richness was evaluated by Bootstrap and Jackknife 1 estimators. Richness comparison between periods of high water level and dry was carried out using the t test. To assess the composition of species and guilds between the periods of high water and dry indirect sorting was carried out by Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) using one axis for analysis. The sorting was carried out using quantitative data and the Bray-Curtis similarity measure. The Vegan (Oksanen et al., 2013) package was used for NMDS analysis and richness estimates, and all analyzes were performed using the R software, version 3.0.1 (R Core Team, 2013). Sociobiology 63(2): 735-743 (June, 2016) 737 Results Community composition A total of 2,958 ants was collected in C. fasciculata canopies during the high water and dry periods in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso, with a density of 24.6 ind./m2. Of these individuals, 2,943 (99.5%; 24.5 ind./m2) are adults, and only 15 (0.5%; 0.1 ind./m2) are immature (larvae). The adults are distributed into four subfamilies, 12 genera and 26 species. Myrmicinae (2,250 ind.; 76.5%; 18.7 ind./m2) was the dominant group, followed by Formicinae (391 ind.; 13.3%; 3.2 ind./m2), Dolichoderinae (264 ind.; 9.0%; 2.2 ind./ m2) and Pseudomyrmecinae (37 ind.; 1.3%; 0.3 ind./m2) (Fig 1). Crematogaster Lundi, 1831 and Cephalotes Latreille, 1802 were the most diverse genus, with five and four species, respectively (Table 1). Temporal variation During the high water period 1,549 individuals (52.4%; 12.9 ind./m2) were collected and 1,409 individuals (47.6%; 11.7 ind./m2) were collected in the dry period. The number of species between high water and dry periods did not present any difference (t-test = -0.136; gl = 9.131; p = 0.894). The indirect ordering of data as to species occurrence (NMDS) between high water and dry periods resulted in a stress = 0.35. The result of the t-test, which compares the scores of the axis, showed a significant difference (t-test = -4.557; gl = 9.943; p = 0.001) between species distribution for the two periods (Fig 3). Among the 26 species living in canopies of C. fasciculata, Camponotus melanoticus Emery, 1894, Crematogaster arcuata Forel, 1899, all belonging to the Cephalotes genus, were found only during the high water period. All species of Azteca Forel, 1878, Crematogaster quadriformis Roger, 1863, Pseudomyrmex termitarius (F. Smith, 1855) and Tapinoma sp. 2 occurred exclusively during the dry period (Table 1), and 13 species are common to both seasonal periods evaluated. Although there was no significant difference in the richness of the ant community between seasonal periods, variations are seen in the distribution of species, individually, however W. auropunctata, Camponotus (Myrmaphaenus) sp. 1, Tapinoma sp. 1, Crematogaster sp. 1, Brachymyrmex heeri Forel, 1874, and Pseudomyrmex pallidus (F. Smith, 1855) occurred in high abundance in the high water period (906 ind.; 59.0%; 15.1 ind./m2) compared to the dry season (176 ind.; 12.5%; 2.9 ind./m2). Crematogaster sp. 3, Crematogaster sp. 2, Solenopsis globularia (Smith, 1858) e Dolichoderus voraginosus Mackay, 1993 appear with high abundance in the dry period (1,064 ind.; 75.6%; 17.7 ind./m2) when compared to the high water period (555 ind.; 36.1%; 9.2 ind./m2). Fig 1. Proportion of the number of Formicidae individuals spread over subfamilies in C. fasciculata canopies, between the periods of high water and dry season in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso. Fig 2. Species richness observed (rarefaction curve) and estimated (Bootstrap and Jackknife 1) for the ant community in C. fasciculata canopies, during high water (trees 1-6) and dry season (trees 7-12) in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso. The community was represented by 26 species. The expected number according to the Bootstrap diversity estimator is 29 species and 32 for Jackknife 1, of which the sampled richness corresponded to 90% and 81% respectively of the species expected for the community (Fig 2). Camponotus (Myrmaphaenus) sp. 1, Wasmannia auropunctata Roger, 1863, Crematogaster sp. 2 and Crematogaster sp. 3 corresponded to the species with the highest frequency of occurrence on the C. fasciculata individuals (Table 1). Myrmicinae was the subfamily with greater richness (13 spp.), followed by Dolichoderinae (6 spp.), Formicinae (4 spp.) and Pseudomyrmecinae (2 spp.). Crematogaster sp. 3 (1,196 ind.; 40.6%; 10.0 ind./m2) was the most abundant species of the community and also among the Myrmicinae, followed by W. auropunctata (459 ind.; 15.6%; 3.8 ind./m2) and Crematogaster sp. 2 (346 ind.; 11.8%; 2.9 ind./m2). L Yamazaki et al. – Ant community associated with Callisthene fasciculata canopies738 Ta xa H ig h w at er D ry s ea so n To ta l F re qu en cy T ro ph ic N % In d. /m 2 N % In d. /m 2 N % In d. /m 2 % G ui ld s D ol ic ho de ri na e D ol ic ho de ri ni A zt ec a in st ab ili s F. S m ith , 1 86 2 - - - 3 0. 2 0. 1 3 0. 1 <0 .1 16 .7 O A zt ec a sp . 1 - - - 11 3 8. 0 1. 9 11 3 3. 8 0. 9 41 .7 O A zt ec a sp . 2 - - - 4 0. 3 0. 1 4 0. 1 <0 .1 16 .7 O D ol ic ho de ru s vo ra gi no su s M ac ka y, 1 99 3 3 0. 2 <0 .1 17 1. 2 0. 3 20 0. 7 0. 2 58 .3 O Ta pi no m a sp . 1 12 1 7. 9 2. 0 2 0. 1 <0 .1 12 3 4. 2 1. 0 33 .3 O Ta pi no m a sp . 2 - - - 1 0. 1 <0 .1 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 O Fo rm ic in ae B ra ch ym yr m ic in i B ra ch ym yr m ex h ee ri F or el , 1 87 4 88 5. 7 1. 5 15 1. 1 0. 3 10 3 3. 5 0. 9 58 .3 O C am po no tin i C am po no tu s ar bo re us (F . S m ith , 1 85 8) 7 0. 5 0. 1 5 0. 4 0. 1 12 0. 4 0. 1 41 .7 O C am po no tu s m el an ot ic us E m er y, 1 89 4 43 2. 8 0. 7 - - - 43 1. 5 0. 4 50 .0 O C am po no tu s (M yr m ap ha en us ) s p. 1 16 6 10 .8 2. 8 67 4. 8 1. 1 23 3 7. 9 1. 9 10 0. 0 O M yr m ic in ae A tti ni C ep ha lo te s at ra tu s (L in na eu s, 1 75 8) 2 0. 1 <0 .1 - - - 2 0. 1 <0 .1 16 .7 P C ep ha lo te s gr an di no su s (F . S m ith , 1 86 0) 1 0. 1 <0 .1 - - - 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 P C ep ha lo te s m in ut us (F ab ri ci us , 1 80 4) 1 0. 1 <0 .1 - - - 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 P C ep ha lo te s pa vo ni i ( L at re ill e, 1 80 9) 1 0. 1 <0 .1 - - - 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 P W as m an ni a au ro pu nc ta ta R og er , 1 86 3 38 4 25 .0 6. 4 75 5. 3 1. 3 45 9 15 .6 3. 8 91 .7 O C re m at og as tr in i C ar eb ar a an op ht ha lm a (E m er y, 1 90 6) 3 0. 2 0. 1 3 0. 2 0. 1 6 0. 2 0. 1 25 .0 H G C re m at og as te r ar cu at a Fo re l, 18 99 5 0. 3 0. 1 - - - 5 0. 2 <0 .1 8. 3 O C re m at og as te r qu ad ri fo rm is R og er , 1 86 3 - - - 29 2. 1 0. 5 29 1. 0 0. 2 25 .0 O C re m at og as te r sp . 1 11 7 7. 6 2. 0 11 0. 8 0. 2 12 8 4. 3 1. 1 66 .7 O C re m at og as te r sp . 2 12 1 7. 9 2. 0 22 5 16 .0 3. 8 34 6 11 .8 2. 9 75 .0 O C re m at og as te r sp . 3 42 8 27 .9 7. 1 76 8 54 .6 12 .8 1, 19 6 40 .6 10 .0 91 .7 O N es om yr m ex s p. 1 12 0. 8 0. 2 7 0. 5 0. 1 19 0. 6 0. 2 50 .0 M S So le no ps id in i So le no ps is g lo bu la ri a (S m ith , 1 85 8) 3 0. 2 0. 1 54 3. 8 0. 9 57 1. 9 0. 5 66 .7 M G H Ps eu do m yr m ec in ae Ps eu do m yr m ec in i P se ud om yr m ex p al lid us (F . S m ith , 1 85 5) 30 2. 0 0. 5 6 0. 4 0. 1 36 1. 2 0. 3 75 .0 G A P P se ud om yr m ex te rm ita ri us (F . S m ith , 1 85 5) - - - 1 0. 1 <0 .1 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 G A P In de te rm in at ed In de te rm in at ed - - - 1 0. 1 <0 .1 1 <0 .1 <0 .1 8. 3 - To ta l a du lts 1, 53 6 99 .2 25 .6 1, 40 7 99 .9 23 .4 2, 94 3 99 .5 24 .5 10 0. 0 - To ta l l ar va es 13 0. 8 0. 2 2 0. 1 <0 .1 15 0. 5 0. 1 41 .7 - G E N E R A L T O TA L 1, 54 9 10 0. 0 25 .8 1, 40 9 10 0. 0 23 .5 2, 95 8 10 0. 0 24 .6 10 0. 0 - T ab le 1 . T ax a, n um be r o f i nd iv id ua ls (N ), re la tiv e ab un da nc e (% ), de ns ity (I nd ./m 2 ) a nd fr eq ue nc y of o cc ur re nc e pe r t re e (% ) o f F or m ic id ae o bt ai ne d in C . f as ci cu la ta c an op ie s, d ur in g hi gh w at er a nd d ry s ea so n in th e Pa nt an al o f P oc on é, M at o G ro ss o, a nd it s ca te go ri za tio n in tr op hi c gu ild s (O m ni vo ro us (O ); P ol lin iv or es (P ); M in im um S pe ci al is ts (M S) ; H yp og ei ca ls G en er al is ts (H G ); M in im um g en er al is ts h yp og ei ca ls (M G H ); G en er al is t a rb or ea l p re da to rs (G A P) . Sociobiology 63(2): 735-743 (June, 2016) 739 Trophic guilds Ants associated with C. fasciculata are distributed in six groups of trophic guilds. In total, the omnivorous were dominant (2,818 ind.; 18 sp.; 95.7%; 23.5 ind./m2) over the general minimum hypogeicals (57 ind.; 1 sp.; 1.9%; 0.5 ind./ m2), general arboreal predators (37 ind.; 2 sp.; 1.3%; 0.3 ind./ m2), minimum specialists (19 ind.;1sp; 0.6%; 0.2 ind./m2) and pollinivores (5 ind.; 4sp; 0.2%; < 0.1 ind./m2). The indirect ordering of the community in relation to the trophic guilds (NMDS) between the high water and dry periods resulted in a stress = 0.29. The result of the t-test, comparing the scores of axis, did not show any difference (t-test = -0.797; gl = 8.844; p = 0.446) between the distribution of guilds for the two periods. As for the distribution of the guilds over the high water and dry periods, omnivores also predominated, 96.5% and 94.9%, respectively. As for the other trophic groups little variation occurred in relation to abundance in both seasonal periods. It is observed that the ants with general nutritional habits, such as those belonging to the omnivores, general minimum hypogeicals and general arboreal predators groups are more distributed among the trees and over the seasonal periods, while the pollinivores were restricted to the high water period. Discussion In canopies of the C. fasciculata Myrmicinae was the dominant subfamily, both in abundance as in species richness. This predominance was observed by Battirola et al. (2005) in the Pantanal of Poconé, MT, Corrêa et al. (2006), Soares et al. (2013) in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso do Sul, and by Castaño-Meneses (2014), in a dry tropical forest in Mexico. For Ribas et al. (2003), dominance behavior in ants can be observed according to the heterogeneity of host plants and availability of resources. A low availability of resources causes the exclusion of some species due to competition, while a greater availability reduces competition and encourages the coexistence of a greater number of species, especially among non specific or generalist groups such as those existing on C. fasciculata canopies. Fernández (1998) pointed out that the high abundance associated with a moderate diversity characterized communities of tropical tree ants. Such a pattern may be associated, according to Kaspari (2003), to the fact that, in the area around the dominant species, richness and density are often reduced because the subordinate species generally formed small colonies with low recruiting capacity and are located on the outskirts of the territories controlled by the dominant species. Arboreal communities generally exhibit high richness of associated species in comparison with other habitats in the same areas. In the C. fasciculata canopies, 26 species were sampled, divided into four subfamilies. A similar result, using the same sampling methods was obtained in the study of ant community in the canopies of Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) in the same region, with register of 29 species and 6 subfamilies (Battirola et al., 2005), including, inclusively, typically soil species such as Atta sp.. However, methodological variations influence these results, as observed by Conceição et al. (2014) in a study on cocoa plantations (Theobroma cacao L., Malvaceae) of different ages in Ilhéus, BA, where 113 species of ants were obtained using sardine baits and honey, entomological net and manual collection in trunks and foliage. In Mexico, Castaño-Meneses (2014) while collecting ants using thermal fogging, verified the presence of 21 morphospecies. In Costa Rica, Longino and Nadkarni (1990) obtained 21 species on different host plants, while Schonberg et al. (2004) sampled 27 species in a comparison study between primary and secondary forest and grassland. Floren and Linsenmair (1997) captured 61 species on Aporusa lagenocarpa A. Shaw and A. subcaudata Merr. (Euphorbiaceae) in Malaysia, and Stork (1991) recorded 32 species in tree canopies in Borneo. It appears, therefore, that richness is similar in arboreal communities from different regions, despite the different sampling efforts, however, the compositions of the communities are extremely variable. Cephalotes and Crematogaster were richer genus on C. fasciculata. In A. phalerata, Solenopsis Westwood, 1840 and Camponotus Mayr, 1861 predominated (Battirola et al., 2005). Pheidole, Camponotus and Ectatomma Smith, 1868 were the most diverse genres in trees in flooded and non- flooded areas in the Pantanal de Miranda, MS (Soares et al., 2013). Pheidole, Ectatomma and Camponotus were the most diverse groups in clumps of dry matter in the Pantanal, MS (Côrrea et al., 2006). Crematogaster and Pheidole presented greater presence in Ilhéus, BA (Conceição et al., 2014). It is observed that Camponotus and Pheidole showed a significant proportion of species presence in several local communities (Brandão et al., 2009), probably because they are generalist species. Cephalotes despite being one of the genus with the greatest presence in number of species in this study Fig 3. Comparison of scores on NMDS axis, generated from the distribution of 26 species of Formicidae in C. fasciculata canopies between the high water and the dry season in the Pantanal of Poconé, Mato Grosso. L Yamazaki et al. – Ant community associated with Callisthene fasciculata canopies740 showed low abundance, which can be explained by Brandão et al. (2009), when affirming that these arboreal species nest exclusively within living or dead branches, making sampling by applying insecticides difficult (Adis et al., 1998). The Pantanal is a stochastic environment, characterized by its seasonality, thus influencing the structure of the landscape and biological characteristics. Studies of arthropods in this region have indicated that their communities can vary over the seasonal periods due to environmental changes imposed the hydrological regime in the region (Battirola et al., 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2014; Marques et al., 2006, 2007, 2011, 2014; Soares et al., 2013). The community of ants in C. fasciculata canopies did not show significant differences in the number of species between high water and dry periods. This may be related to the dominance exercised by some species, such as the Crematogaster, which totaled 56.7% of the community. In addition to dominance, factors such as the stability, availability, quantify and quality of resources, and nesting sites present in the habitats can affect the structuring of these communities (e.g. Ribas et al. 2003). However, there was a significant difference (t-test = -4.557; gl = 9.943; p = 0.001) in the distribution of species between C. fasciculata individuals during both seasonal periods evaluated. The frequency of occurrence obtained for Camponotus (Myrmaphaenus) sp. 1, W. auropunctata, Crematogaster sp. 2 and Crematogaster sp. 3 shows that these species occur in many C. fasciculata individuals, indicating a close interaction with this habitat (Table 1). It is observed that, individually, W. auropunctata in the high water season, was the second most abundant species, representing 25.0% of the C. fasciculata community with 384 individuals, and in the dry season, accounted for only 5.3%, with 75 representatives. Extensive areas of undergrowth are used as natural habitat by this species, but individuals can secondarily move to the treetops, acquiring characteristics of a dominant arboreal species (Majer & Delabie, 1993; Majer et al., 1994), which would explain the significant variation in their occurrence in this habitat. The greater abundance of W. auropunctata in C. fasciculata canopies in the high water period may indicate a possible vertical migration as a survival strategy of this species. Adis et al. (2001) observed soil shifts to tree trunks during periods of high water in the Pantanal de Mato Grosso for Acromyrmex lundi carli Santschi, 1925 (Fomicidae: Myrmicinae) shifting their ground nests to tree trunks. Solenopsis saevissima (F. Smith, 1865) also feature specific survival strategies, which in addition to vertical displacement, also move horizontally over the water, following the high water line in the Pantanal. The displacement between the soil, trunks and tree canopies associated with the flooding cycle was also observed for Polyxenida (Diplopoda) (Battirola et al., 2009) and Plusioporus salvadorii Silvestri, 1895 (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida) (Adis et al., 2001). A dominant species often tolerates a number of non- dominant or subdominant species, creating positive associations between them (Majer et al., 1994; Delabie et al., 2007), which may explain the few changes that have occurred in the structure and composition of the community in the two seasonal periods of this study. Castaño-Meneses (2014) verified that the abundance in tree canopies in the Biological Station of Chamela, Mexico, is greater during the dry period because many plant species flourish in this period. They also have epiphytes, which provide resources such as shelter, water and debris to be used by the ants. These results differ from those obtained in C. fasciculata, because during the high water season, the C. fasciculata foliage matures, while in the dry season, the plant has partial dormancy (Corsini & Guarim-Neto, 2000), changing probably the availability of resources. It appears therefore, that the phenology of C. fasciculata did not influence directly on the number of individuals and species of the ant community, but indirectly, the falling leaves can change the habitat conditions, influencing the distribution of some species. Ants can explore a wide variety of resources due to their diversity of eating habits (Castaño-Meneses, 2014), this fact favors the predominance of omnivorous ants in C. fasciculata canopies and in the most tree species canopies (Castaño-Meneses, 2014). The disturbed areas are dominated by opportunistic or generalist species, as the same present a competitive advantage due to the varying resources (Hoffmann & Andersen, 2003), which may explain the large amount of omnivorous in this study, indicating the existence of a few specialized groups as well as the predominance of generalist groups. Rojas and Fragoso (2000) collected ants in the soil and on vegetation in the Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico, and 72% of the sampled individuals belonged to omnivorous and granivorous guilds, followed by predators, pollinivores and fungi cultivators, facts related by the authors to the availability of resources. Castaño-Meneses (2014) found in their collections groupings of omnivores (60%), granivores (17%), predators (14%), nectarivores (7%) and herbivores (2%), unlike the study in C. fasciculata, where granivores and nectarivores were separated from herbivores. They also found that predators were more abundant in the rainy months, herbivores were restricted to this same period and omnivores were more abundant during the dry season. Changes in the pattern of ant’s composition at different times occur due to variations in eating habitats and in the specie’s ability to use distinct resources (Meyer et al., 2010; Cook et al., 2011; Castaño-Meneses, 2014). The results of this study showed that the temporal variation not influence the richness of ant arboreal community, however they influence the distribution of species between C. fasciculata canopies over the assessed seasonal periods. The richness of species in this habitat is similar to that obtained in another study of arboreal communities in the Pantanal (Battirola et al., 2005). It can be noted, therefore, that the C. fasciculata canopies are an important habitat, contributing to the maintenance of biological diversity in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso. Sociobiology 63(2): 735-743 (June, 2016) 741 Acknowledgements Our thanks to the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais (PPGCAM/UFMT/Sinop) for the opportunity to carry out this study and to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship to the first author for the development of his Masters. To the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT Process No. 737641/2008.), and to NEBAM - Núcleo de Estudos da Biodiversidade da Amazônia Mato-grossense for logistical support. References Adis, J. (1997). Estratégias de sobrevivência de invertebrados terrestres em florestas inundáveis da Amazônia Central: Uma resposta à inundação de longo período. Acta Amazonica, 27: 43-54. Adis, J., Basset, Y., Floren, A., Hammond, P. & Linsenmair, K.E. (1998). Canopy fogging of an overstory tree - recom- mendations for standardization. Ecotropica, 4: 93-97. Adis, J., Erwin, T.L., Battirola, L.D. & Ketelhut, S.M. (2010). The importance of Amazonian floodplain forests for animal biodiversity: Beetles in canopies of floodplain and upland forests. In W.J. Junk, M.T.F. Piedade, F. Wittmann, J. Schöngart & P. Parolin (Orgs.). Amazon floodplain forests: Ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management (pp. 313-325). 1ª ed. Dordrecht: Springer. Adis, J., Marques, M.I. & Wantzen, K.M. (2001). First observations on the survival strategies of terricolous arthropods in the northern Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Andrias, 15: 127-128. Basset, Y., Horlyck, V. & Wright, J. (2002). Forest canopies and their importance. In Y. Basset, V. Horlyck & J. Wright (Eds.). Studying Forest Canopies from Above: The International Canopy Crane Network (pp. 27-34). Bogotá: Editorial Panamericana de Colombia. Battirola, L.D., Adis, J., Marques, M.I. & Silva, F.H.O. (2007). Comunidade de artrópodes associada à copa de Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae), durante o período de cheia no Pantanal de Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Neotropical Entomology, 36: 640-651. Battirola, L. D., Marques, M. I., Adis, J. & Brescovit, A.D. (2004). Aspectos ecológicos da comunidade de Araneae (Arthropoda, Arachnida) em copas da palmeira Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) no Pantanal de Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 48: 421-430. Battirola, L.D., Marques, M.I., Adis, J. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2005). Composição da comunidade de Formicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) em copas de Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) no Pantanal de Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 49: 107-117. Battirola, L.D., Marques, M.I., Rosado-Neto, G.H., Pinheiro, T.G. & Pinho, N.G.C. (2009). Vertical and time distribution of Diplopoda (Arthropoda: Myriapoda) in a monodominant forest in Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Zoologia, 26: 479–487. Battirola, L.D., Santos, G.B., Rosado-Neto, G.H. & Marques, M.I. (2014). Coleoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) associados às copas de Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) no Pantanal de Poconé, Mato Grosso, Brasil. EntomoBrasilis, 7: 20-28. doi:10.12741/ebrasilis.v7i1.316 Bolton, B. (2003). Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 71: 1-370. Bolton, B. (2014). An online catalog of the ants of the world. http://antcat.org. (access date: June 25, 2014). Brandão C.R.F., Silva, R.R. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2009). Formigas (Hymenoptera). In A.R. Panizzi & J.R.P. Parra (Eds.). Bioecologia e nutrição de insetos: Base para o manejo integrado de pragas (pp. 323-369). Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica. Castaño-Meneses, G. (2014). Trophic guild structure of a canopy ants community in a mexican tropical deciduous forest. Sociobiology, 61: 35-42. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology. v61i1.35-42 Castilho, A.C.C., Delabie, J.H.C., Marques, M.I., Adis, J. & Mendes, L. (2007) Registros novos da formiga criptobiótica Creightonidris scambognatha Brown (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Neotropical Entomology, 36: 150-152. Conceição, E.S., Delabie, J.H.C., Lucia, T.M.C.D. Costa- Neto, A.O. & Majer, J.D. (2014). Structural changes in arboreal ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an age sequence of cocoa plantations in the south-east of Bahia, Brazil. Austral Entomology, 54: 315-324. doi:10.1111/aen.12128 Cook, S.C., Eubanks, M.D., Gold, R.E. & Behmer, S.T. (2011). Seasonality directs contrasting food collection behavior and nutrient regulation strategies in ants. PLoS ONE, 6: e25407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025407 Corrêa, M.M., Fernandes, W.D. & Leal, I.R. (2006). Diversidade de formigas epigeicas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em capões do Pantanal sul mato-grossense: Relações entre riqueza de espécies e complexidade estrutural da área. Neotropical Entomology, 35: 724-730. Corsini, E. & Guarim-Neto, G. (2000). Aspectos ecológicos da vegetação de “carvoal” (Callisthene fasciculata (Spr.) Mart.) no Pantanal mato-grossense. In: Anais do III Simpósio sobre recursos naturais e socioeconômicos do Pantanal, Corumbá: Embrapa/UFMS 1:1-52. Custódio, L.N., Carmo-Oliveira, R., Mendes-Rodrigues, C. & Oliveira, P.E. (2014). Pre-dispersal seed predation and abortion in species of Callisthene and Qualea (Vochysiaceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 28: 309-320. Delabie, J.H.C., Jahyny, B., Nascimento, I.C., Mariano, C.S.F., Lacau, S., Campiolo, S., Philpott, S.M. & Leponce, M. L Yamazaki et al. – Ant community associated with Callisthene fasciculata canopies742 (2007). Contribution of cocoa plantations to the conservation of native ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with a special emphasis on the Atlantic Forest fauna of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16: 2359-2384. doi 10.1007/ s10531-007-9190-6 Delabie, J.H.C., Ospina, M. & Zabala, G. (2003). Relaciones entre hormigas y plantas: Uma introducción. In F. Fernández (ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. (pp. 167-180). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Fernández, F. (1998). ¿Por qué hay tantas hormigas em los árboles? Innovación y Ciencia, 7: 42-51. Fernández, F. (2003a). Subfamilia Formicinae. In F. Fernández (Ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (pp. 299-306). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Fernández, F. (2003a). Subfamilia Formicinae. In F. Fernández (Ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (pp. 307-330). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Floren, A. & Linsenmair, K.E. (1997). Diversity and recolonization dynamics of selected arthropod groups on different tree species in a lowland rainforest in Sabah, Malaysia, with special reference to Formicidae. In N.E. Stork, J. Adis & R.K. Didham (Eds.). Canopy Arthropods (pp. 344-381). London: Chapman & Hall. Fowler, H.G., Bernardi, J.V.E., Delabie, J.C., Forti, L.C. & Pereira-da-Silva, V. (1990). Major ant problems of South America. In R.K. Van der Meer, K. Jaffe & A. Cedeno (Eds.) Applied myrmecology: a world perspective (pp. 3-14). Boulder: Westview Press. Heckman, C.W. (1998). The Pantanal of Poconé: Biota and ecology in the northern section of the world’s largest pristine wetland. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 624 p. Hoffmann, B.D. & Andersen, A.N. (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austral Ecology, 28: 444-64. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990). The ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 732 p. Kaspari, M. (2003). Introducción a la ecología de las hormigas. In F. Fernández (Ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (pp. 97-112). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Longino, J.T. & Nadkarni, N.M. (1990). A comparison of ground and canopy leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a neotropical montane forest. Psyche, 97: 81-93. Lowman, M.D. & Nadkarni, N.M. (1995). Forest Canopies. San Diego: Academic Press, 624 p. Majer, J.D. & Delabie, J.H.C. (1993). An evaluation of Brazilian cocoa farm ants as potential biological control agents. Journal of Plant Protection in the Tropics, 10: 43-49. Majer, J.D., Delabie, J.H.C. & Smith, M.R.B. (1994). Arboreal ant community patterns in Brazilian cocoa farms. Biotropica, 26: 73–83. Marques, M.I., Adis, J., Battirola, L.D., Brescovit, A.D., Silva, F.H.O. & Silva, J.L. (2007). Variação sazonal na composição da comunidade de artrópodes associada à copa de Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. (Guttiferae) no Pantanal mato-grossense, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Amazoniana, 19: 131-148. Marques, M.I., Adis, J., Battirola, L.D., Santos, G.B. & Castilho, A.C.C. (2011). Arthropods associated with a forest of Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae) palm trees in the northern Pantanal of the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso. In W.J. Junk, C.J. da Silva, C. Nunes-da-Cunha. & K.M. Wantzen (Orgs.). The Pantanal of Mato Grosso: Ecology, biodiversity and sustainable management of a large Neotropical seasonal wetland (pp. 431-468). Sofia - Moscow: Pensof, 1. Marques, M.I., Adis, J., Santos, G.B. & Battirola, L.D. (2006). Terrestrial arthropods from tree canopies in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 50: 257-267. Marques, M.I., Santos, G.B. & Battirola, L.D. (2014). Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) associados à Vochysia divergens Pohl (Vochysiaceae) na região norte do Pantanal de Mato Grosso, Brasil. EntomoBrasilis, 7: 159-160. Marques, M.I., Sousa, W.O., Santos, G.B., Battirola, L.D. & Anjos, K.C. (2010). Fauna de artrópodes de solo. In I.M. Fernandes, C.A. Signor & J. Penha (eds.). Biodiversidade no Pantanal de Poconé (pp. 73 -112). Centro de Pesquisa do Pantanal. Meyer, K.M., Schiffers, K., Münkemüller, T., Schädler, M., Calabrese, J.M., Basset, A., Breulmann, M., Duquesne, S., Hidding, B., Huth, A., Schöb, C. & Van-de-Voorde, T.F.J. (2010). Predicting population and community dynamics: the type of aggregation matters. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 563-571. doi: 10.1016/jbaae.2010.08.001 Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Drozd, P. & Cizek, L. (2002a). Host specialization of leaf chewing insects in a New Guinea rainforest. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 400-412. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Weiblen, G.D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. (2002b). Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature, 416: 841-844. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, M.P., Stevens, H.H. & Wagner, H. (2013). Vegan: Community Ecology. Package. R package version 2.0-8. http://CRAN.R-project. org/package=vegan. (access date: November 16, 2014). Pott, A. & Pott, V.J. (1994). Plantas do Pantanal. Corumbá: Embrapa-SPI, 320p. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment Sociobiology 63(2): 735-743 (June, 2016) 743 for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. (access date: November 16, 2014). Ribas, C.R., Schoereder, J.H., Pic, M. & Soares, S.M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28: 305-314. Rojas, P. & Fragoso, C. (2000). Composition, diversity, and distribution of a Chihuahuan Desert ant community (Mapimí, México). Journal of Arid Environments, 44: 213-227. doi: 10.1006/jare.1999.0583 Santos, I.A., Ribas, C.R. & Schoereder, J.H. (2008). Biodiversidade de formigas em tipos vegetacionais brasileiros: o efeito das escalas espaciais, In E.F. Vilela (Ed.). Insetos sociais: da biologia à aplicação (p. 242-265). Viçosa: Ed. UFV. Schonberg, L.A., Longino, J.T., Nadkarni, N.M., Yanoviak, S.P. & Gering, J.C. (2004). Arboreal ant species richness in primary forest, secondary forest, and pasture habitats of a tropical montane landscape. Biotropica, 36: 402-409. Silvestre, R., Brandão, C.R.F. & Rosa-da-Silva, R. (2003). Grupos funcionales de hormigas: el caso de los gremios del Cerrado. In F. Fernández (Ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (pp. 113-148). Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Simberloff, D. & Dayan, T. (1991). The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22: 115-143. Soares, S.A., Suarez, Y.R., Fernandes, W.D., Tenório, P.M.S., Delabie, J.H.C. & Antonialli-Junior, W.F. (2013). Temporal variation in the composition of ant assemblages (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) on trees in the Pantanal floodplain, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 57: 84-90. doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013000100013 Stork, N.E. (1991). The composition of arthropod fauna of Bornean lowland rainforest trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 7: 161-180. Stork, N.E. & Grimbacher, P.S. (2006). Beetle assemblages from an Australian tropical rainforest show that the canopy and the ground strata contribute equally to biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273: 1969-1975.