JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LOGOPEDIC SOCIETY November New Aspects of Voice Physiology VOCAL FOLD VIBRATIONS WITHOUT AIR-STREAM IN A LIVING HUMAN BEING By G. H. BRECKWOLDT, Ph. D. JOHANNES MtiLLER (1801-1858) had shown the medical world that there were certain laws of voice-production which could be demonstrated in experiments with the larynges of corpses. In these experiments he showed that (1) the pitch of the tone thus artificially produced depended on the tension of the vocal folds. In other words, if the air-stream remained constant and the tension of the folds of the same larynx was increased, the pitch of the tone went up. He found that (2) with an increasing intensity of the air-stream the volume of the tone increased and the pitch went up. If, however, (3) the pitch of the tone was to remain constant but its volume to increase, the air-stream must be increased but the tension of the vocal folds must be decreased. MtjLLER regulated the ten- sion of the folds with weights. The air pressure was produced by means of bellows (cf. H. GUTZMANN, "Sprachheilkunde" Berlin, 1924, p.14 seq.) ' Scientists who held against MULLER'S EXPERIMENT the fact that he had gained his results from experiments with the heads of bodies and not with living individuals, were directed to experiments demonstrating subglottal pressure "in vivo" i.e. in patients who, after tracheotomy had to wear a cannula. These experiments were sup- posed to show, similar to MULLER'S findings, that voice pitch depends upon the interaction of vocal fold tension and air-pressure, (cf. CAGNIARD DE LA TOUR 1857). The general idea was that the breath-stream activated, i.e. vibrated the otherwise passive vocal folds. As early as 1898 EWALD and after him NAGEL, in 1906-07, criticised the theory that the vocal cords vibrate through the air-stream only; they thought that the air-stream caused the muscles within the folds to vibrate on their own. (cf. G. PANCON- CELLI-CALZIA, "Die Stinmatnung" Leipzig, 1956 p.64). CALZIA says that their criticism was justi- fied, but that their explanation was wrong. Before R. HUSSON began his experiments in Voice Physiology there were no experiments in this field of any importance, (for the following: cf. R. HUSSON: "Physiology of the Vibrations of the Vocal Folds," Logopaedie en Phoniatrie, Rotter- dam, October 1956, and HUSSON'S numerous publications). Up to HUSSON'S researches we find the conventional idea that the larynx can be com- pared with various musical instruments, such as a horn, a cushion-whistle or organ-pipe, etc. F i g . l . C U S H I O N - W H I S T L E by W E T H L O .