66 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

An Empirical Capital Market Rate Function for 
South Africa 

Elna Pretorius and Charlotte du Toit 

Department of Economics. University of Pretoria 

ABSTRACT 

The aim of this paper is to explain the detenninants of the South African long-
tenn interest rate. A market-related approach is followed which explains interest 
rate detennination on the basis of the relationships between the capital maricet 
and other domestic and international markets. Some implications for monetary 
policy are derived. 

JEL G 12 

1 INTRODUCTION 

Interest rates are the key detenninants in the flow of funds from the financial 
sector to particular real investments in the real sector of the economy. If the 
markets operate efficiently, funds flow to the most economically attractive real 
investment opportunities, where attractiveness is detennined by the interest rate 
offered and the probability of being repaid. In practice, money flows in large 
amounts from lenders to different borrowers on the basis of fairly small changes 
in interest rates. Relatively small changes in interest rates can therefore cause 
huge flows of money from one sector to another. These flows, in tum, can be a 
major detenninant of the amount of real economic activity that takes place and 
in what sectors growth occurs. Even a percentage point increase can have a huge 
impact on the present discounted value of future revenues, and thus on 
investment decisions, output and jobs (Smith & Spudeck, 1993: 14). Interest 
rates are therefore a vital part of the economy, and knowledge of the role of 
interest rates and the reasons underlying their movements is crucial to an 
understanding of financial developments and economic po Hcy. 

Monetary authorities are particularly interested in the detennination of the long-
tenn interest rate and wish to understand to what extent they can influence it. In 
South Africa the Reserve Bank plays a vital role in detennining the level of 
short-term interest rates since these are closely related to the repo rate, which is 
the interest rate at which the Reserve Bank lends money to commercial banks. 
However, monetary authorities do not know .whether, and to what extent, they 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 67 

can influence the long-tenn interest rate. The aim of this paper is to determine 
the factors underlying changes in the long-term interest rates in South Africa, 
with specific reference to the implications for monetary policy. 

Apart from analysing the univariate characteristics of the data and empirically 
estimating the factors that influence the interest rate and the magnitudes of these 
influences, the estimated function is subjected to rigorous diagnostic and 
stability testing. The estimated function can be used to forecast the long-run 
level of South African interest rates, and will form the linkage between the real 
and fmancial sectors in the macroeconometric model of the Department of 
Economics, University of Pretoria. 

2 THE SOCIO-POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 

The course of South African interest rates could be influenced by the different 
phases of monetary policy and the dramatic socio-political changes in the 
country. Since the empirical function will be estimated for the period 1960 to 
1998, the discussion will also be confined to this period. 

During the 1960s, the South African Reserve Bank attempted to slow down an 
excessive expansion of liquidity in the banking sector by introducing a required 
liquid asset ratio in the Banks Act of 1965. After the promulgation of the Banks 
Act, there were years of brisk economic activity, increasing inflationary 
pressures and a rapidly expanding liquidity base of the banking system. During 
his tenure, Dr De Jongb (Reserve Bank Governor from 1967 to 1980) 
implemented a series of additional direct controls such as a ceiling on advances, 
deposit rate controls, exchange control, import deposits and some direct 
consumer credit controls in an effort to contain the persistent increases in money 
supply and the inflationary tendency. The results were encouraging, and the 
country enjoyed higb levels of real growth. 

The controls of the 1960s and 1970s gave way in the 1980s to a general 
recognition of the need to abolish as many restrictions as possible in a shift to 
market-oriented policy. This was in line with the international thinking of the 
time. During the 1980s, there was a definite shift across the globe in favour of 
market-oriented policy measures. This shift in policy was further encouraged by 
the liberalisation of international financial markets. South Africa likewise 
followed this pattern, and under Dr De Kock (Reserve Bank Governor from 
1981 to 1989), the Reserve Bank became more willing to align its policies to 
market developments, rather than to try to force markets in a certain direction. 
This was the most difficult decade in the history of the Reserve Bank, operating 
as it did in the face of widespread international hostility and growing resistance 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



68 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

to the consequences of the economic and racial policies of the government at the 
time. After President PW Botha's so-called Rubicon speech, international 
sanctions and a debt boycott were introduced against South Africa. and huge 
amounts of capital flowed out of the country almost immediately. This period of 
international isolation was characterised by high interest rates that attempted to 
prevent capital outflow and attract foreign capital. (Botha, 1997; Fourie et al., 
1999: 314). 

Although monetary policy did not change much in the 1990s - the Stals era 
some most dramatic changes in the socio--political situation occurred during this 
period. After the first democratic election in 1994, political barriers were 
removed and South Africa became more exposed to world financial market 
movements, as a result of the abolition of sanctions and the scrapping of 
exchange controls on foreigners. Since 1994 in particular, South Africa has 
adopted a clearly defined policy of actively participating in the process of 
fmancial globalisation and implemented a number of economic policies to 
facilitate its participation in globalisation (Stals, 1999). 

Financial globalisation caused revolutionary and irreversible changes in capital 
markets. International capital transactions have accelerated and international 
financial interdependence increased substantially. Innovation and deregulation 
have changed financial market structures. More instruments and markets have 
developed, and technological change has made portfolios comprising 
international assets universal. As a consequence of these transformations, 
financial markets have become more efficient, but also more volatile and subject 
to speculation. Some countries benefit greatly from the opportunity to attract 
unprecedented inflows of capital. However, international markets tend to shun 
countries that are not performing well. It is therefore not surprising that sub-
Saharan Africa. the region with the world's poorest growth record, is now a net 
exporter of capital. Furthermore, capital flight is increasingly prevalent in 
countries that are perceived not to provide competitive investment 
opportunities. The international environment has simply become much more 
averse to countries that do not foster competitive economies (Handley & Mills, 
1996: 74). 

In broad, monetary policy in South Africa since the 1960s can thus be divided 
into the pre-1985 and post-1985 periods, with a shift from the use of direct 
monetary instruments to more market-oriented monetary policy. This dramatic 
policy shift implies that monetary variables such as interest rates will contain a 
structural break, which should be reflected in the empirical estimation of such a 
variable. The most significant socio-political events that impacted on the course 
of South African interest rates, international sanctions and the process of 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No I 69 

financial globalisation, also have to be reflected in the empirical estimation of 
interest rates. 

3 THE SOUTH AFRICAN CAPITAL MARKET 

The capital market constitutes the long-term component of the financial system, 
and can be regarded as the complex structure of institutions and mechanisms 
involved in the trade of long-term securities (with maturity longer than one year) 
(Fourie, Falkena & Kok, 1999: 183). It is not a physical market, but only the 
abstract concept that includes all trade in long-term securities in the same way 
that the money market includes all trade in short-term securities (Stapelberg, 
1981: 23). The capital market can be broadly divided into two parts, namely the 
primary and the secondary market New securities are issued in the primary 
market, while previously issued securities are traded in the secondary market 

3.1 The primary capital market 

Securities are issued in the primary market by institutions wishing to borrow 
money. Securities are issued in South Africa by the Treasury, public 
corporations (e.g. Eskom), public utilities (e.g. Telkom and Transnet), local 
authorities and private sector companies when they need to finance their 
activities. The demand for the securities issued in the primary capital market is 
generally by banks, building societies, insurance companies, pension funds, 
mining houses, stockbrokers, and the Public Investment Commissioners (Fourie 
eta!., 1992: 121). 

The securities issued in the primary market can be either fixed- or variable-
interest-bearing securities. Fixed-interest-bearing securities such as government 
bonds, annuities and debentures are characterised by a stipulated maturity date 
and value (the nominal or face value) and contractually guaranteed interest 
payments. These interest payments are based on a fixed and predetermined rate 
(the coupon rate) paid on the nominal value of the bond (Fourie et aI., 1999: 
172). If the security is issued at nominal value, its yield will be equal to this rate 
of interest, since the interest payment will be the only income received from this 
investment. However, if the security is issued at a price below the nominal 
value, the yield to maturity will be higher than this rate of interest since the yield 
will not only include the interest receipts but also a capital gain. The interest 
rates on variable-interest securities (e.g. long-term loans), shares and negotiable 
documents fluctuate sharply, particularly when the inflation rate changes 
frequently. In South Africa, a variable-interest loan normally remains a contract 
solely between the lender and the borrower. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



70 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (200 I) No I 

The way in which secuntIes are issued depends on the type of security. 
Government bonds are sold on a tap or tender basis. In the case of a tap issue, 
the Reserve Bank buys stock from the Treasury at a rate at which the Bank can 
sell a fairly large volume to the market, and then resell it to the public. In the 
case of a tender issue, the date of the issue and amount of stock available are 
announced to the public, and sold to the highest bidders. Other fixed-interest 
securities as well as all variable-interest securities are either sold by the issuer or 
by an underwriter, usually a merchant bank, acting on behalf of the issuer. The 
issue may either be by way of a public issue where the terms and conditions are 
announced to the public at large, or by way of a private issue where it is offered 
only to selected investors (Fourie et al., 1999: 185; Fabozzi, 1992: 523). 

3.2 The secondary capital market 

The securities issued in the primary market are traded in the secondary market. 
The financial intermediary sector is the principal supplier of funds to the 
secondary capital market, in particular insurers, pension funds and building 
societies, which simply channel surplus funds of the household sector into 
appropriate invesnnents. Other banking institutions, the Public Invesnnent 
Commissioners, and other financial intermediaries such as participation 
mortgage bond schemes and the National Housing Commission are also lenders 
in the capital market (Fourie et al., 1992: 41). The main traders of securities in 
the secondary capital market are divided into five categories, namely fmancial 
intermediaries, the government, corporate business enterprises, households and 
the foreign sector. Foreign participants, in other words foreign households, 
businesses, institutional investors and governments, act in the South African 
capital market in the same way as domestic households, businesses, investors 
and the government. However, technological development and the process of 
globalisation have dramatically increased the importance and role of foreign 
participants in the domestic capital and other fmancial markets. Globalisation 
bas resulted in the acceleration of international capital transactions, and 
international fmancial interdependence has increased substantially. In 
consequence, fmancial markets have become more efficient, but also more 
volatile and subject to speculation practices. Advances in computer technology, 
coupled with advanced telecommunication systems, link market participants 
throughout the world and allow the transmission of real-time information on 
security prices and other key information to many participants in many places. 
This enables many investors to monitor global markets and simultaneously 
assess how this information will impact on the risk/reward profile of their 
portfolios (Fabozzi, 1995: IS). 

The securities that are issued in the primary market are traded in the secondary 
market. The number of new securities issued in the primary market bas a 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No I 71 

considerable influence on the demand for and price of securities in the 
secondary market. The secondary market serves as a barometer of changes in the 
markets and reflects these changes in the prices and volumes of traded 
securities. This gives the issuers in the primary market a good idea of the correct 
price and interest rate at which they should issue new securities which is vital to 
a successful issue. The secondary market also guarantees investors that they will 
be able to resell their securities and adjust their portfolios, provides an indication 
of the general availability of funds and enables the Reserve Bank to buy and sell 
securities in order to influence the liquidity of financial markets (Fourie, 
1999:13; Faure et al .• 1991: 10). 

There are active markets in many of the securities issued in the primary market, 
but they differ in terms of so-called "breadth" and "depth". Mainly fixed-
interest-bearing securities are traded in the secondary market, while there is 
virtually no secondary market for variable-interest securities because of the 
uncertainty of their variable pattern of income which makes it difficult to 
discount their future earnings. Institutions trade in the secondary market in the 
attempt to maximise their expected portfolio returns while bearing minimum 
risk. Investment is therefore a risk-return trade-off. 

The nominal rate of return (R) on a security is not the absolute rand return, but is 

R sl - So + d d . f th . calculated as = , where So an s} are the pnce 0 e secunty at 
So 

the beginning and the end of the investment and d, any dividends or interest 
payments in the interim (Kobold, 1986: 67). Since the rate of return is uncertain, 
the investor has to take into account the risk that the expected return may not be 
realised. Risk is the variation of actual return from expected return and may be 
caused by broad economic forces such as recession, unemployment and 
inflation, or attributable to causes that are peculiar to the specific security or 
issuing company. There are several risks associated with investing in bonds. 
Interest-rate risk is the risk that if an investor has to sell a bond prior to the 
maturity date, an increase in interest rates will mean a capital loss (F abozzi & 
Modigliani, 1996: 5). Reinvestment risk is the variability in the reinvestment 
rate of a given strategy because of changes in market interest rates (Fabozzi & 
Modigliani, 1996: 5). Default or credit risk is the risk that the issuer of a bond 
may default, in other words be unable to make timely principal and interest 
payments on the issue. Inflation or purchasing power risk arises as a result of the 
variation in the value of cash flows from a security because of inflation, as 
measured in terms of purchasing power of money (Fabozzi & Modigliani, 1996: 
7). The risk that the currency in which the flows are paid will depreciate relative 
to the rand, is the exchange rate or currency risk (Fabozzi & Modigliani, 1996: 
7). Liquidity or marketability risk depends on the ease with which an issue can 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



72 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

be sold at or near its value, usually measured by the size of the spread between 
the bid price and the ask price quoted by a dealer (Fabozzi & Modigliani, 1996: 
7). 

Risk and return are always the criteria for investment, but investors can choose 
between the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), Markowitz's portfolio choice 
theory and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) (Dobbins, Witt & Fielding, 
1994: 18). Security prices conform to the law of demand and the law of supply 
like any other price. Since the demand and supply of a security are determined 
by the behaviour of investors, their behaviour will also influence security prices 
and therefore interest rates. 

4 AN EMPIRICAL FUNCTIONIMODEL FOR THE LONG-TERM 
INTEREST RATE 

In this section the determinants of the long-term interest rate are empirically 
estimated by means of annual data. Although the yield on the R150 long-term 
government bond is the leading long-term interest rate in South Africa, it was 
issued in 1987 and expires in 2004, which means that only a minute sample of 
12 observations is currently available. The Rl50 yield is also extremely volatile, 
which makes empirical estimation rather difficult Hence in this study the yield 
on the Eskom 168 (EI68) security is used instead to proxy the general level of 
long-run interest rates in South Africa (see Figure I). 

The E 168 is a security issued by Eskom. It has biannual interest payments fixed 
at II per cent on the nominal value. and it matures on I June 2008. Unlike the 
RI50 and other government bonds, the government does not guarantee Eskorn 
securities. The guarantee of Eskorn securities lies in the size of Eskom. the fifth 
largest utility in the world, and the nature of its business, namely the provision 
of electricity to Southern Africa (http://www.eskom.co.za). Hence Eskom 
securities, like government bonds, are not subject to default risk. Since the EI68 
long-term Eskom security has no default risk, is actively traded in the South· . 
African capital market and a relatively large sample is available, it may be used 
to proxy long-term interest rates in South Africa. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No I 73 

Figure 1 The Eskom rate 

20 

18 

16 

14 

12 

10 

8 

6 

4 
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 

4.1 The theoretical model 

The process of globalisation dramatically changed the way in which small open 
economies, such as South Africa, function. They no longer function in an 
isolated environment, for their financial markets are driven by developments in 
international markets. The market approach (see Gayed 1990 and Murphy 1991) 
is therefore regarded as the most appropriate analytical method in a small open 
economy where the interaction between the various domestic and international 
markets predominantly determines interest rates. Studies on interest rate 
determination in small open economies, such as Harmse and Du Toit (1999) and 
Hodgson, Kremmer and Lee (1998), are therefore based on the market approach, 
which explains interest rate determination on the basis of the relationship 
between the various domestic and international markets. On the other hand, 
interest rates in large economies are mainly determined by the traditional 
demand and supply factors. Studies such as Tran and Sawbney (1998), Mehra 
(1995) and Mehra (1994) on interest rate determination in industrialised 
countries are thus based on the economic approach which explains interest rate 
determination by the demand and supply of money or loanable funds. This study 
will however follow the market approach, since South Africa has a small open 
economy where interest rates are determined by movements in international and 
domestic markets. 

A priori theory suggests the following about the relevant variables and their 
coefficients: 

(i) The long-term interest rate should be positively related to international 
interest rates. As the South African fmancial markets become more 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



74 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No I 

integrated with the international fmancial system, the relationship 
between domestic and international interest rates becomes increasingly 
important. Domestic interest rates that are too low will eventually be 
reflected in a weak currency, and also cause further depreciation of the 
rand. Conversely, interest rates that are too high will encourage 
speculative short-term foreign capital that will cause undesirable 
appreciation of the currency and/or an unhealthy expansion of domestic 
liquidity (SARB, 1999). Various studies such as that of Pain and Thomas 
(1997), Hodgson, Kremmer and Lee (1998) and Awad and Goodwin, have 
shown that the US long-bond rate is the most influential in the world and 
can be regarded as the leading rate. It is also used in most studies of small 
open economies such as Harmse and Du Toit (1999) and Hodgson, 
Kremmer and Lee (1998) to represent the international level of interest 
rates. Hence in this study, the US long-bond rate is also used to represent 
the level of international interest rates. 

(n) The short-term interest rates are determined in the money market. If the 
long-term interest rate does not rise when the short-term interest rates rise, 
investors will substitute their long-term bonds for money market 
securities. An increase in the short-term rate should therefore cause an 
increase in the long-term rate. 

(iii) According to the Fisher effect, the rate of inflation causes the nominal 
interest rate to change so that the real rate is unaffected by the rate of 
inflation. An increase in expected inflation should therefore result in a 
proportional increase in the nominal interest rate. 

This results in the following specification for the interest rate function (See 
Appendix 2 for an explanation of the pneumonic variables): 

RL = £{US, E(INFL), RS) 
(+ + +) 

4.2 Thedata 

All the data were obtained from the Quarterly Bulletin of the South African 
Reserve Bank, except the US interest rate which was obtained from the 
International Financial Statistics of the International Monetary Fund. All the 
variables were transformed into the naturallogaritbmic form. Annual data from 
1960 to 1998 were used. 

The yield on the E 168 Eskom bond was used as the representative long-term 
interest rate in South Africa. The three-month banker's acceptance rate is 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (200 I) No 1 75 

considered to be the representative short-tenn interest rate and the yield on 30-
year US government bonds is used as the long-tenn interest rate of the USA. 
Kalman filter predictions of the expected one-period-ahead inflation rate were 
used as inflationary expectations. The specification, including the lagged 
inflation rate, interest rate and exchange rate, was based on the specification of 
Koekemoer (2000) for Kalman filter predictions of the expected one-period-
ahead price expectations. In the specification the rand-dollar exchange rate was 
used as the exchange rate, and the Eskom rate as the interest rate. A dummy 
variable was created to represent the years 1985 to 1990 during which there 
were international sanctions and disinvestment actions against South Afiica. 
During this period, interest rates were kept at a high level in an attempt to 
prevent capital outflow and to attract foreign capital. 

Models that contain potentially non-stationary variables can result in a spurious 
regression, indicating statistically significant relationships where there are none. 
The statistical significance obtained from standard regression techniques with 
non-stationary variables is picking up is the existence of contemporaneous 
correlation in the variables due to their trending over time, rather than a 
meaningful causal relationship between them. It is therefore vital to detennine 
the order of integration of all the variables used in the econometric analysis, 
since this will detennine the correct estimation technique to use. In this study, 
the augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) (1979) and Phillips-Perron (PP) (1988) 
tests were used in conjunction with data plots to establish the order of 
integration of the variables. The ADF test assumes that the errors are statistically 
independent and have a constant variance, while the PP test allows the 
disturbances to be weakly dependent and heterogeneously distributed (Enders, 
1995: 239). The PP test also has greater power to reject the false null hypothesis 
of a unit root, except when the errors have a moving average (MA) structure, in 
which case this test tends to reject the null hypothesis whether it is true or false. 
Since the structure of the error terms is usually unknown, it is preferable to use 
both tests. Hence both the augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and the Phillips-
Perron (PP) tests were used in this study to establish the order of integration of 
the variables. When there are structural breaks, however, the ADF and PP test 
statistics are biased towards the non-rejection of a unit root, and the Perron 
(1989) test for unit roots in the presence of a structural break should be used 
instead (Enders, 1995: 261; Charernza & Deadman, 1997: 119). Appendix 3 
summarises the results of the unit root tests. 

A priori theory suggests a possible structural break in South Afiican long-tenn 
interest rate in 1985 when monetary policy changed dramatically from direct to 
market-oriented monetary instruments. The graph of the long-tenn interest rate 
series (see figure I) confinns that a possible structural break occurred in 1985. 
The results of the ADF and PP test are invalidated by the occurrence of a 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



76 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

structural break - hence the Perron test for testing unit roots in the presence of a 
structural break was used to test the stationarity of the Eskom series. The results, 
which are summarised in Appendix 3, confirm that the long-term interest rate is 
trend-stationary with a structural break in 1985. 

Visual inspection of the graph of the long-term US interest rate (see Appendix 1) 
suggests a possible structural break. The Perron test for a unit root in the 
presence of a structural break confirms that the US long-term interest rate is in 
fact trend-stationary with a structural break (see Appendix 3). 

The ADF and PP tests rejected the null hypothesis of a unit root against the 
alternative of trend stationarity for the short-term interest rate. Therefore, if a 
trend is included in the regression, the short-term interest rate can be directly 
included in the OLS-regression. 

In contrast to a priori expectations, both the ADF and PP tests could not reject 
the null hypothesis of a unit root for the inflationary expectations in levels 
(E(lNFL)). However, if there is a structural break in the inflation rate and 
inflationary expectations as suggested by the graphs, it invalidates the results of 
the ADF and PP tests. The results of the Perron test for unit roots in the presence 
of a structural break render expected inflation trend-stationary with a structural 
break in 1985. Inflationary expectations are therefore regarded as integrated of 
order zero. 

4.3 Empirical estimation of tbe long-term interest rate function for South 
Africa 

The dependent variable tested trend-stationary with a structural break in 1985, 
which implies that ordinary least squares (OLS) is the appropriate technique to 
use, with a trend dummy (TIME) and a dummy allowing for the new trend (DT) 
included. With the trend and the new trend dummies included, the South African 
short-term and US long-term interest rates can be regarded as stationary and 
therefore included without any transformation. 

Both the long-run equilibrium equation and the short-run dynamics or deviations 
from equilibrium are simultaneously included when OLS is used - in other 
words an ECM structure such as that of Mehra (1994), Mehra (1995) and 
Harmse and Du Toit (1999) is considered to be inappropriate in this context. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 77 

Table 1 Estimation results of OLS-regression, dependent variable: SA 
long-term interest rate 

Coefficient Standard t-value p-values 
Variable Error 

US 0.225712 0.084908 2.658324 0.0125 
RS 0.241269 0.047219 5.109571 0.0000 
TIME 0.000491 0.036744 3.752138 0.0000 
DT 0.020408 0.005954 3.427301 0.0018 
E(INFL) 0.984009 5.35E-05 9.177556 0.0557 
DUM- 0.165878 0.494351 1.990508 0.0004 
SANCT 
RS(-2) 0.138707 0.041299 4.016492 i 0.0008 

Sample period (adjusted): 1964 to 1998 
iP =0.9578 DW= 1.9696 
s.e. = 0.0756 F == 136.9639 

With the natural logarithmic form, coefficients may be interpreted as elasticities. 
The coefficient of each explanatory variable can be interpreted as follows: 

i) US long-term interest rate (US). A one per cent increase in the long-term 
interest rate of the US results in a 0.225712 per cent increase in the 
domestic (SA) long-term interest rate. 

ii) Short-term interest rate (RS). A one per cent increase in the short-term 
interest rate results in a 0.241269 per cent increase in the long-term 
interest rate. Apart from this contemporaneous effect, a one per cent 
increase in the short-term interest rate two years ago will also cause a 
0.138707 per cent increase in the current long-term interest rate. The 
short-term rate one period ago was insignificant. 

iii) Inflationary expectations «E(INFL». A one per cent increase in the one-
period-ahead inflationary expectations results in a 0.984009 per cent 
increase in the long-term interest rate. When the null hypothesis that the 
coefficient is not equal to one was tested against the alternative hypothesis 
that it is equal to one, it was rejected. The coefficient is therefore assumed 
to be one, which conforms to the a priori expectation. 

iv) Sanctions (DUM-SANCT). During the period of sanctions against South 
Africa, interest rates were on average 0.165878 percentage points above 
the equilibrium path. This implies that South Africa was extremely 
sensitive to international sentiment at that time. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



78 SAmMS NS Vol 4 (200 I) No I 

v) Time trend (TIME). The coefficient of the trend in the equation is 
0.000491 which means that the long-tenn interest rate grows on average 
by 0.000491 per cent every year. 

vi) New trend (DT). The coefficient of the variable that measures the new 
trend after 1985 is 0.020408, which means that the interest rate grows on 
average 0.020408 per cent faster than before. 

5 EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS 

5.1 Economic evaluation of the estimated function 

Except for the coefficient of inflationary expectations that should be one, 
economic theory provides only a priori information on the sign of the 
coefficients and not on the size of the coefficients. As explained in section 4.1, 
the long-term US interest rate, the domestic short-term interest rate, inflationary 
expectations and sanctions should have a positive effect on the long-tenn 
interest rate. The results in Table 1 indicate that the influence of all the variables 
conforms to the requirements of economic theory. It can therefore be concluded 
that this function is an acceptable representation of the long-tenn interest rate of 
South Africa. 

5.2 Statistical evaluation of the estimated function 

Since all the variables in the regression are stationary, the assumptions of 
classical regression analysis are fulfilled. Consequently standard diagnostic and 
other statistical tests can be used to evaluate this function statistically. 

The adjusted R-squared (iP) of 0.957736 indicates that 95.7736 per cent of the 
variation in the long-term interest rate is explained by the variation in the 
dependent variables, which is evidence of a very good fit. The F-statistic of 
136.9639 indicates that the dependent variables are jointly significant in .. 
explaining the long-tenn interest rate. The Durban-Watson (OW) statistic of 
1.969636 fails to reject the null hypothesis of no serial correlation. The t-
statistics testing the significance of the individual coefficients indicate that all 
the coefficients are significantly different from zero, and should therefore be 
included in the function. Table 2 summarizes the results of the diagnostic tests 
performed on the function. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (200 I) No 1 79 

Table 2 Diagnostic test results 

Test performed Test Test-statistic Probability 
for 

Normality Jarque-Bera 0.367785 0.832025 
Heteroscedasticity ARCH 0.005304 0.941945 

White 8.983760 0.774169 
Serial correlation Breuch-Godfrey 2.424835 0.297477 

LM 
Specification Ramsey Reset 1.648535 0.210456 
Parameter CUSUM Stable 
stability CUSUM

2 Stable 

These diagnostic tests proved that 

i) the error terms are normally distributed 
ii) there is no heteroscedasticity present in the error terms 
iii) there is no serial correlation in the error terms 
iv) no variables have been omitted, and the specification of the functional 

form is correct 
v) the parameters are stable 

5.3 Dynamic simulation 

To obtain an indication of the goodness of fit of the model, an initial dynamic 
simulation was performed. A graphical representation of the actual and 
simulated values for the derived equation provides a good indication whether the 
function is a good representation of the true data-generating process. The close 
correlation between the actual and simulated values of the long-term interest rate 
(see Figure 2) suggests that the function is a good representation of the true data-
generating process. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



80 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

Figure 2 Actual and simulated values of tbe long-term interest rate 

20~--------------------------~ 

18 

16 

14 

12 

10 

8 

6 

65 70 75 80 85 90 95 

The model was subsequently subjected to two different types of shocks. In the 
first place the sensitivity of the model was tested by increasing the explanatory 
variables by 10 per cent. If the model is stable, these shocks should result in 
consistent long-run elasticity effects. This means that the simulated value must 
increase by 10 per cent of the original coefficient when one of the long-run 
explanatory variables is shocked by 10 per cent. When one of the short-term 
explanatory variables is increased, there should be an initial movement away 
from the long-run equilibrium path, but eventually the model should return to 
the original equilibrium path. The dynamics of the model are driven by the 
short-term interest rate and the sanction dummy, and they are the only variables 
giving dynamic feedback. In the second place, the stability of the model was 
tested by shocking each of the variables only in one period to test how long the 
system takes to return to equilibrium. The effect of the sensitivity and stability 
shocks on the US rate are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. Although now shown 
here, similar shocks were performed on all the other explanatory variables, and .. 
all of them illustrated that the function is stable. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 81 

Figure 3 Difference between sbocked and original simulated interest 
rates wben a stability test is performed on tbe US interest rate 

0.025...-----------------, 

0.020 

0.015 

0.010 

0.005 

As may be seen from the graph, the difference between the initial and shocked 
simulations disappears almost immediately. This means that the effect of a 
shock will not persist, and that the model is therefore extremely stable. 

A typical sensitivity test shocks the explanatory variables in the model, one at a 
time, by increasing them by 10 per cent. The shocks in the long-run variables 
must result in a convergence of the dependent variable on 10 per cent of the 
estimated coefficient of the shocked variable - in other words 10 per cent of the 
elasticity effect. A shock in the short-run variables, however, must result in an 
initial shock, after which the dependent variable must converge on the original 
equilibrium path. The first shock was performed on the US long-tenn rate, by 
increasing it by 10 per cent from 1967. The difference between the original and 
shocked simulations is illustrated in Figure 4. The shock results in an immediate 
movement away from the long-run equilibrium path to a new equilibrium path. 
The difference between the original and shocked simulations is 10 per cent of 
the coefficient of the US interest rate, which is consistent with the elasticity 
effect. Although not shown here, similar shocks were perfonned on all the other 
explanatory variables, and they all indicated that the function is stable. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



82 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

Figure 4 Difference between shocked and original simulated interest 
rates when a sensitivity test is performed on the US long-term 
interest rate 

0.025,-------------------, 

0.020 

0.015 

0.010 

0.005 

0.000+r-,...,....,.,.+~..,.......,........,....".~,...,....,~.,.."~.,...,,...,....,...,....,...,....,....1 

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 

The function has passed economic and statistical evaluation and can therefore be 
regarded as a true representation of the determination of the South African long-
term interest rate. The results showed that the long-term interest rate is mainly 
determined by inflationary expectations, but that the US long-term rate and the 
domestic short-term rate also have important influences on the long-term rate. 
Interest rates increased significantly during the sanction era, which shows that 
South Africa is extremely vulnerable to international sentiment. These results 
have important policy implications, which are discussed in the next section. 

6 THE EFFECT ON MONETARY POLICY 

Monetary policy makers want to know whether and to what extent they are able 
to influence long-term interest rates, and which instruments they should use. The 
results of the empirical estimation indicate that the South African long-term' 
interest rate reacts mainly to changes in international interest rates, the short-
term interest rate and inflationary expectations. This has several important 
policy implications. 

The South African Reserve Bank plays a vital role in determining the level of 
short-term interest rates, because they are closely related to the rates at which 
the Bank lends money to private sector banks (SARB, 1999). Since the 
empirical results showed that the long-term interest rate reacts to changes in the 
short-term interest rate, monetary authorities can influence the long-term rate by 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No I 83 

changing the short-term rate. However, the influence of the Reserve Bank on the 
long-term interest rate through changes in the short-term interest rate is limited. 
Owing to fmancial globalisation, the monetary authorities in a small open 
economy such as that of South Africa cannot force interest rates, especially 
long-term interest rates, in a direction other than that dictated by the markets. If 
the monetary authorities try to do that, investors and borrowers simply go to 
other countries with competitive opportunities. 

The influence of the US rate is almost as great as the influence of the domestic 
short-term rate. This means that, as in other small open economies, the South 
African long-term rate is extremely sensitive to movements in international 
markets. This emphasises the fact that the South African capital market is not a 
price leader but a price follower, and that the authorities cannot force domestic 
interest rates in a direction other than that dictated by the markets. The upward 
pressure on interest rates during the sanctions era also emphasises the sensitivity 
of South African interest rates to international sentiment. 

The empirical results indicated that the influence of inflationary expectations is 
far greater than that of the short-term or foreign interest rates. This shows that 
the monetary authorities can have a greater effect on the long-term interest rate 
if they can influence inflationary expectations. As part of a new approach to 
monetary policy and price stabilisation, the government and the Reserve Bank 
announced an inflation target band in February 2000. The inflation-targeting 
framework does not require significant changes in monetary policy, but the aim 
is to reduce the inflationary expectations of consumers, producers, employers 
and workers (RSA, 2000: 3). The experiences of other countries that adopted 
inflation targets show that this increases stability in nominal interest rates. The 
results of this study show that nominal interest rates in South Africa will also be 
stabilised if the monetary authorities can convince the public that the inflation 
target will be reached. 

The monetary authorities can influence the long-term interest rate by changing 
the short-term interest rate and inflationary expectations. The influence of 
inflationary expectations on the long-term interest rate is greater than that of the 
short-term interest rate, and therefore the recently introduced inflation-targeting 
framework can have a significant impact on the long-term interest rate if it 
reduces inflationary expectations. As in other small open economies, the South 
African interest rate is sensitive to changes in international interest rates and 
therefore the monetary authorities cannot force interest rates in a direction other 
than that which the markets dictate. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



84 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

7 CONCLUSION 

A market-related approach was followed in this study to explain the 
detennination of long-term interest rate in South Africa. Apart from the 
theoretical factors, the political and economic environment in which interest 
rates are determined plays a key role in the process of interest rate 
detennination. 

Broadly put, since the 1960s South African monetary policy may be divided into 
the pre-1985 and post-1985 periods with the shift from the use of direct 
monetary instruments to market-oriented monetary policy. This shift was in line 
with the global shift in the 1980s to market-oriented policy, and was encouraged 
by the liberalisation of international fmancial markets. 

The most significant socio-political events that impacted on the course of South 
African interest rates were the international sanctions during the 1980s, and the 
process of fmancial globalisation during the 1990s. The sanctions period was 
characterised by high interest rates in the attempt to prevent capital outflow and 
attract foreign capital. Owing to fmancial globalisation, international fmandal 
interdependence has increased substantially, and also become more volatile and 
subject to speculation. 

The factors that influence the South African long-term interest rate and the 
magnitudes of these influences were empirically estimated on the basis of a 
market-related approach, with annual data from 1960 to 1998. The results 
indicated that there was a structural break in the long-term interest rate in 1985 
when monetary policy in South Africa changed, in line with the rest of the 
world, from direct to market-oriented policy. The long-term interest rate is 
detennined by the US long-term rate, the domestic short-term rate and 
inflationary expectations, of which inflationary expectations have the greatest 
influence. This means that the monetary authorities can affect long-term interest 
rates by either changing short-term interest rates or influencing inflationary 
expectations. but they cannot force interest rates in a direction other than that 
indicated by the markets because domestic rates are sensitive to changes in 
international markets. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 85 

APPENDIXl 

Graphical representation of data series employed in estimations 

20 25 

18 

20 
16 

14 15 

12 

10 10 

8 
5 

6 

4 0 
00 65 70 75 80 65 00 95 00 65 70 75 80 65 00 95 

- SAIong-IErm_rlIIJiI - SA shcrt-term interest rlIIJiI 

14 600 

12 600 

10 400 

8 !l(lO 

6 200 

4 100 

2 0 
00 65 70 75 80 00 95 70 75 80 

- us Ialg-term i_ rate R-I ...:Ilenge rlIIJiI 

25 20 

20 
15 

15 

10 
10 

5 5 

65 70 75 80 65 00 95 75 80 65 00 95 

- E>peded Inflaticn -lnIIaIlcn 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



86 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

APPENDIX 1 
List ofvariables 

Series Description 
RL Nominal SA long-tenn interest rate (Eskom rate) 
US Nominal rate of US long-tenn government bonds 
RS Nominal SA short-tenn interest rate (3-month banker's 

acceptance rate) 
DUM-SANCT Dummy created to represent years of sanctions and 

disinvestment actions against South Africa 
E(INFL) Kalman filter prediction of expected one-period-ahead 

• consumer price level 
DT Dummy for the new trend since structural break in 1985 
TIME Trend 

APPENDIX 3 
Order of integration 

Table A Augmented Dickey-Fuller and Phillips-Perron tests for non-
stationarity, levels, 1960-1998 (all data series in natural 
logaritbmic form) 

Series Model Lagsl 

RS 

* 
** 
*** 

Trend 1 
Constant 4 
None 4 

Slgmficant at a 10% level 
Significant at a 5% level 
Significant at a 1 % level 

'tn 'tl1• 't ~~ PpZ 
-4.196** 5.98*** -3.190* 
-1.76 3.166 -1.540 

1.23 2.57 0.4968 

TableD Augmented Dickey-Fuller and Pbillips-Perron Tests for non-
stationarity, first differenced, 1960-1998 (aU series in natural· 
logaritbmic form) 

Series Model Lags 
E(INFL) Trend 3 

* 
** 
*** 

Constant 0 
None 0 

Significant at a 10% level 
Significant at a 5% level 
Significant at a I % level 

't" 'tu,'t ~'.1 
IpP 

0.4366 2.11 -0.606 
-1.66 i 2.78 -1.570 
-0.427 -0.316 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 87 

Table C Perron Tesf for non-stationarity in the presence of a structural 
break4, levels, 1960-1998 (all data series in naturallogaritbmic 
form) 

Series TB I.. K ~ ~ y as tr(a-l) 
(t,J (t~) (tT) (ta ) 

RL 1985 0.64 0 -84.899 0.04416 -0.0475 0.21614 ! -30.57* 
(-18.14) (18.63) (-7.028) (-4.85**) i 

US 1985° 0.7 3 -85.663 0.04439 -0.1069 0.27123 -32.79* 
(-18.66) (19.07) (-13.69) (-3.93*) 

E 0 -12.419 0.00633 -0.0129 0.17428 -32.20* 
(INFL) 

1985 10.64 
(-14.42) (14.52) (-lD.71) (-4.78**) 

'" 
"'''' 

SlgDlficant at a 5% level 
Significant at a 1 % level 

ENDNOTES 

The number of lags used in the estimated equations was determined 
according to the method suggested by Said and Dickey (1984), which 
means starting with TI/3 lags and using sequential t-tests to exclude the last 
lag if insignificant. 

2 The number of truncation lags used in the Banlett kernel was detennined 
as suggested by Newey-West. For this sample size Newey-West suggested 
3. 

3 The version that tests Ho:Yt=J.It+Yt-I+(Jl2-JlI)DUt+et against Ha: 
Yt=Jl+l3lt+(I3z-131)DTt·+et, where DUt=1 if t>TB and 0 otherwise and 
DTt·=t ift>TB and 0 otherwise, was used. 

4 The parameters given are from the model: 
k 

Yt Ii + f1 + jDT· t +Yt ;Yt = ayt-l + .L ci~Yt-i + &t 
1=1 

5 Phillips and Ouliaris (1990) showed that t ratio procedures diverge under 
that alternative at a slower rate than direct coefficient tests, which means 
that direct coefficient tests should have superior power properties over t 
ratio tests. Therefore the T{ a-I) test might have higher power than the a 
test and therefore both are reported. However, in this study they gave the 
same results. 

6 Visual inspection of the data suggests a possible structural break in 1981, 
and the Perron test confirmed this by rejecting the null hypothesis of a unit 
root against the alternative of trend stationarity with a structural break in 
1981. However, to keep the specification parsimonious, the Perron test 
was also conducted to test the null of a unit root against the alternative of 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



88 SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 

trend stationarity with a structural break in 1985. 
7 Data from 1954 to 1998 were used to test the stationarity of the US 

interest rate. 

REFERENCES 

AWAD, M.A. & GOODWIN, B.K. (1998) "Dynamic Linkages Among 
Real Interest Rates In Reply to: International Capital Markets", Journal of 
International Money and Finance, 17: 881-907. 

2 BOTHA, D.J.J. (1997) "The South African Reserve Bank and the Rate of 
Interest", South African Journal of Economics, 65: 532-67. 

3 CHAREMZA, W.W. & DEADMAN D.F. (1997) New Directions in 
Econometric Practice: General to Specific Modelling, Cointegration and 
Vector Autoregression, Hampshire: Elgar. 

4 DICKEY, D. A & Fuller, W.A. (1979) "Distribution of the Estimators for 
Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root", Journal of the American 
Statistical Association, 74: 427-31. 

5 ENDERS, W. (1995) Applied Econometric Time Series, New York: John 
Wiley & Sons Inc. 

6 FABOZZI, F.J. (1992) Active Asset Allocation: State-of-the-Art Portfolio 
PoliCies, Strategies and Tactics, Chicago: Probus Pub. Co. 

7 FABOZZI, FJ. (1995) Investment Management, New Jersey: Prentice 
Hall, Inc. 

8 FABOZZI, FJ. & MODIGLIANI, F. (1996) Capital Markets: Institutions 
and Instruments, London: Prentice Hall, Inc. 

9 FAURE, A.P.; FALKENA, H.B.; KOK, W.J. & RAINE, G.E. (1991) The 
Interest-Bearing Securities Market, Halfway House: Southern Book 
Publishers (Pty) Ltd. 

10 FOURIE, LJ., FALKENA, H.B. & KOK, W.J. (1992) Fundamentals of 
the South African Financial System, Halfway House: Southern Book 
Publishers. 

II FOURIE, LJ., FALKENA, H.B. & KOK, W.J. (1999) Student Guide to 
the South African Financial System, Cape Town: Oxford University Press. 

12 GA YED, M.E.S. (1990) Intermarket Analysis and Investing: Integrating 
Economic, Fundamental and Technical Trends, New York: New York 
Institute of Finance. 

13 HANDLEY, A. & MILLS, G. (1996) The South African Economy in the 
1990s, Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs. 

14 HARMSE, C. & DU TOIT, C.B. (1999) "An Empirical Capital Market 
Rate Function for an Emerging Market Economy", South African Journal 
of Economic and Management Sciences, 2: 335-57. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.



SAJEMS NS Vol 4 (2001) No 1 89 

15 HODGSON, A., KREMMER, M.L. & LEE, S. (1998) "Endogenous and 
Exogenous Determinants of Interest Rates", Journal of Multinational 
Financial Managament, 8: 249-63. 

16 KOEKEMOER, R. (2000) "Private Consumption Expenditure in South 
Africa: The Role of Price Expectations and Learning", Unpublished 
Doctoral Thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. 

17 MEHRA, Y.P. (1994) "An Error-Correction Model of the Long-Term 
Bond Rate, Economic Quarterly 80: 49-69. 

18 MEHRA, Y.P. (1995) "Some Key Empirical Determinants of Short-Term 
Nominal Interest Rates", Economic Quarterly, 81: 33-52. 

19 MURPHY, 1.1. (1991) Intermarket Technical Analysis: Trading Strategies 
for the Global Stock, Bond, Commodity, and Currency Markets, Toronto: 
John Wiley & Sons Inc. 

20 PAIN, D. & THOMAS, R. (1997) Real Interest Rate Linkages: Testingfor 
Common Trends and Cycles, London: Bank of England. 

21 PERRON, P. (1989) "The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit 
Root Hypothesis", Econometrica, 57: 1361-402. 

22 PHILLIPS, P.C.B. & PERRON, P. (1988) "Testing for a Unit Root in 
Time Series Regression", Biometrika, 75: 335-46. 

23 PHILLIPS, P.C.B. & OULIARIS, S. (1990) "Asymptotic Properties of 
Residual Based Tests for Cointegration", Econometrica, 58: 165-93. 

24 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA (RSA) (2000) Budget Review 2000, 
Pretoria: Government Printer. 

25 SAID, S.E. & DICKEY, D.A. (1984) "Testing for Unit Roots in 
Autoregressive-Moving Average Models with Unknown Order", 
Biometrika, 71: 599-607. 

26 SMITH, S.S. & SPUDICK, R.E. (1993) Interest Rates - Principles and 
Applications, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: The Dryden Press. 

27 SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK (SARB) (1999) Fact Sheet No.8: 
Interest Rates and How They Work, Pretoria: South African Reserve Bank. 

28 ST ALS, C. (1999) The Influence of International Financial Crises on the 
South African Economy, Address at the 5200 Congress of the South 
African Nurserymen's Association on 17 May 2000. 

29 STAPELBERG, N.H. (1981) Die Finansiele Stroktuur van SUid-Afrika. 
Pretoria: N.H.S. Uitgewers. 

30 TRAN, D.T. & SA WHNEY, B.L., (1988) "Government Deficits, Capital 
Flows and Interest Rates" Applied Economics, 20: 753-65. 

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

00
9)

.