untitled SA JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2008 VOL 64 NO 1 17 High Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence and Poor Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Exercises among Women in a Health District in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. R e s e a r c h A r t i c l e INTRODUCTION Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a common but underreported problem globally amongst women,1, 2 with a prevalence between 27% and 42%.3,4,5,6,7 There is very limited information on the preva- lence and health burden of UI in South Africa and why so few women seek help for this manageable condition. In 1998, the South African Demographic and Health Survey measured the prevalence of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) in South Africa for the first time, but only for women who had ever had children.2 In 1998, the World Health Orga- nisation’s first International Consultation on Incontinence classified UI as a disease and made recommendations on assessment, treatment and advocated to raise awareness about its symptoms and prevention.8,9 UI, an increasing public health issue in ageing populations,8 presents in three main types – Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) and Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI). Both Pelvic Floor Muscle (PFM) exercises with and without biofeed- back have been shown to significantly improve symptoms of UI.10 Randomised controlled trials and a Cochrane sys- tematic review recommended that PFM exercises are an effective first-line, safe alternative treatment for all three types of incontinence.1,8 Despite strong evidence for therapy being available, Australian women’s knowledge, prac- tices and intentions regarding correct PFM exercises in 2000 was poor and they required to be taught how to do the exercises correctly.11 UI is a social taboo and considered a normal consequence of childbirth and ageing. Sufferers remain silent about suffering with this disease due to embar- rassment and a misconception that it CORRESPONDENCE TO: Jackie Madombwe Disability and Rehabilitation Coordinator Uthukela District Office Private Bag X9958, Ladysmith 3370 Tel: (036) 631-2202 Cell: 076 112-4808 Email: jackie.madombwe@kznhealth.gov.za ABSTRACT: Introduction: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and health seeking behaviour of women with urinary incontinence and their knowledge of pelvic floor exercises, in a health district in KwaZulu-Natal. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study design was used. Between September 2005 and November 2005, a questionnaire was administered to 99 women aged 21 – 76 years at randomly selected from. Results: The study found that the prevalence of the urinary incontinence was 35% (95% Confidence Interval, 26 to 45). The most common type of incontinence was stress urinary incontinence, 63% (95% CI, 46 to 79). Of the 99 women, 32% (95% CI, 23 to 42) had heard of pelvic floor muscle exercises, while only 18% (95% CI, 11 – 26) had actually carried out the intervention. Of the 35 women with urinary incontinence, 26% had sought professional help, the most common reason for seeking help being a worsening in condition. Conclusion: The prevalence of urinary incontinence in KwaZulu-Natal is high, knowledge of urinary incontinence as a disease and its management, among both women and health service providers is poor. KEY WORDS: URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, URGE URINARY INCONTINENCE, MIXED URINARY INCONTINENCE, PREVALENCE, PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISES. Madombwe JP, BSc (Hons) Physio, MPH1, Knight SE, MB, BCh. FCPHM (SA), Specialist/Lecturer1 1 School of Family and Public Health Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal. cannot be treated.12 In 1998, it was found that only 25% of incontinent Japanese women had consulted a doctor.7 This was similar in Sweden where three out four incontinent women had never sought help as they felt that their incontinence was not a serious disease that needed professional care.13 This study aims to investigate the prevalence of UI, the health seeking behaviour and knowledge of pelvic floor exercises of women in a health district in KwaZulu-Natal. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: With special thanks to the South African Society of Physiotherapy for their assistance with funding this research. 18 SA JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2008 VOL 64 NO 1 METHODOLOGY This was an observational descriptive cross sectional study of 100 women randomly selected using dwelling units in the health district as a proxy sampling frame. Adult females over the age of 21 years formed the study population. Any women with mental retardation, other degenerative brain disease, spinal cord injuries, chronic urinary tract infection, or women on diuretic, anti-psychotic medication or opiates, and women over the age of 80 were excluded from the sample. Data on the number of children, number pregnancies, and method of delivery was collected but was not analysed as it was not the purpose of the study. Data was collected using a custom-designed questionnaire and administered by four trained interviewers, in the language of the respondent’s pre- ference. The questionnaire was validated by translators to identify any possible problems with wording. The question- naire was then piloted by administering it to eight women in a gynaecologist’s waiting room, to identify any further problems. As a result of this process some questions were modified to improve validity of the questionnaire. To identify UI, the question “do you have any difficulty at all controlling urination?” was asked. There was a follow-up question on any past problems with controlling urination and all those who indicated a problem in the past 12 months were taken as having UI. The questionnaire included questions to determine type of incontinence, whether stress, urge or mixed, based on the defi- nitions of the International Continence Society,14 a section on knowledge of PFM exercises and another section ask- ing to who the patient with UI reported. In order to reduce information bias, the four interviewers used to collect the data underwent intensive training on how to administer the questionnaire and the importance of asking the questions in a uniform manner using standard prompts where necessary. Simple random sampling of dwelling units reduced selection bias. Where there was more than one eligible woman in a the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee and the Postgraduate Education Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Medicine. Permission was also sought and granted from the Ladysmith Municipality. RESULTS Out of 100 sampled households, in two households the women refused to be interviewed and in another two, the women were unavailable. In six house- holds there were two women in residence. A total of 102 women were interviewed but three women were excluded because one was pregnant, one was 83 years old and one was on diuretics which brought the number of women included in the study to 99. Prevalence Of the 99 women, 35.4% (35) (95% CI, 25.9 – 44.8) reported UI. The majority of the 35 incontinent women (62.9%; 95% CI, 46.5 – 79.2) had SUI (23), 31.4% (95% CI, 15.7 – 47.1) had MUI (11), while only 2.9% (95% CI, -2.8 – 8.5) had UUI (1). The total prevalence of SUI was 23.2% (23) (95% CI, 14.8 – 31.7), MUI was 11.1% (11) (95% CI, 4.8 – 17.4) and UUI was 1.0% (1) (95% CI, -1.0 – 3.0), n=99. (Fig 1). home, all were included in the sample. Using interviewer administered ques- tionnaires overcame the problems of low response rate and dealing with the population with low literacy. Inter- viewing respondents in their language of preference reduced language bias. In most cases it was possible to match interviewers and respondents by race, reducing any possible cultural biases. The Ladysmith community is a very small, urbanised community and most of the women use similar health facilities. This may present difficulties with generalising the results of this study to larger cities where there are a variety of health care options available. One pos- sible confounder that was not accounted for was age, as UI is known to increase with age.10 Data was collected between September 2005 and November 2005. The study was explained to the women and per- mission to interview them was obtained by written consent. Each woman was left with a leaflet that explained UI and gave basic instructions on how to perform pelvic floor exercises. All statistical computations were done by a statistician, using the SAS version 9 programme. Ethical approval was sought and full ethical approval was obtained from 2 Women who actually had knowledge of how to perform the PFM exercises, whether it was from instructions in a magazine or formal instruc- tions from a professional. 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 UI P re v a le n c e % SUI MUI UUI Type of Incontinence Figure 1: Prevalence (%) of types UI in women in Ladysmith, 2005 (N=99) SA JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2008 VOL 64 NO 1 19 Reasons for not seeking help Leakage is part of normal ageing 4 Leakage is normal after childbirth 7 Leakage is only a small problem 20 Did not know what types of help are available 1 (More than one reason could be given) Table 2: Reasons women with UI gave for not seeking help, n= 26 ing help was that it was considered a small problem. (Tables 1 and 2). Two of the women who sought help did not attend their follow-up visits. For one of the women, it was because she was not happy with the service she received at the clinic and she did not know what other help was available. Further more, she was not financially able to seek any further help, although she felt that her condition was worsening. DISCUSSION UI was found to be common, with a prevalence that may even be higher than the reported 35.4% (35), as some women may have been too embarrassed to admit to such a condition. However, the 35.4% prevalence is consistent with other previous studies.4,5,7 A higher prevalence of 40.7% in 2004 and 42% in 2005 was found among Chinese and Rwandan women respectively.15, 3 SUI has been said to be the most common type of UI and is commonly associated with childbirth and preg- nancy.1 In this study, SUI was found to be the most common of the three types of UI, followed by MUI and UUI. Luna et al found that of the women with UI, 80% had SUI, 14% had MUI and 4% had UUI.7 Out of the total sample of 99 women, this study found a 23.2% (23) preva- lence of SUI. This is more than double the 10% prevalence of SUI reported by the 1998 SADHS.2 It may be that the prevalence has increased, as was found by Wong et al among Hong Kong Chinese women, where prevalence of SUI had increased from 21% in 1996 to 40.7% in 2005.15 The difference in prevalence may also be due to the 1998 SADHS not having been an inconti- nence specific survey. The question on incontinence was one among many other questions dealing with other health issues and the question may not have been stressed adequately, resulting in respon- dents not considering it as important. Only 32.3% (32) of the 99 women interviewed had heard of PFM exercises, and 18.1% (18) had actually done the exercises. This is a very low prevalence out of a sample of largely parous women, who would be expected to have actually been taught the PFM exercises The mean age of the total sample was 43.7 years (95% CI, 40.3 – 45.8) and the median age was 43.0 years. Using the Shapiro-Wilk Test (p=0.22) to test for normality, the ages of women in the sample were assessed to be normally distributed. However, the size of age groups varied. The 31-40 year age group had the most women (29) with only two women in the sample in the 71-80 year age group. The largest proportion of cases was in the 41 –50 year age group, 42.9% (15) (95% CI, 24.2 – 61.6). The mean age of the women without UI was 41.6 years (95% CI, 39.1 – 45.9), while the mean age of the women with UI was 45.5 years (95% CI, 41.7 – 49.4). There was no significant difference between the means of the two groups (t test = -1.26, p = 0.05). Knowledge of PFM exercises Only 32.3% (32) (95% CI, 23.1 – 41.5) of the 99 women had heard of PFM exercises and 18.2% (18) (95% CI, 10.6 – 25.8) had actually learned them.2 Of the 35 women who had UI, 31.4% (11) had heard of PFM exercises and only 17.1% (6) actually did them. Only one woman out of those who had heard of PFM exercises had heard of them from her doctor and one other had heard of them from ante natal clinic. The other 28 had heard of them from magazines and two from their yoga instructors. Health Seeking Behaviour Out of the 35 women with UI only nine (25.7%) sought professional help. The most common reason for seeking help was that the problem was getting worse. The most common reason for not seek- 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 P e rc e n ta g e % Age 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 Figure 2: Age distribution of study sample (N=99) Reasons for seeking help Urine leakage worsened 6 Leakage is shameful and embarrassing 4 Leakage caused decreased physical activity 1 Did not want problem to worsen 1 (More than one reason could be given) Table 1: Reasons women with UI gave for seeking help, n=9 20 SA JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2008 VOL 64 NO 1 at their antenatal visits. Chiarelli et al. in 2003, found that out of a sample of 720 women, 95.7% had heard of PFM exercises but their study concluded that despite good knowledge of PFM exer- cises, few women actually did them.11 What was most disturbing in this study was that even women with UI were not being taught PFM exercises as a first line of treatment. The Cochrane review on effectiveness of PFM exercises concluded that they were an effective treatment method of UI.1 The evidence shows that they are not been taught or done. There appeared to be a disturbing lack of knowledge among health prac- titioners in Ladysmith as to UI and its assessment and treatment. If women could be taught PFM exer- cises to prevent UI, long term morbidity associated with pregnancy and child- birth would be reduced and the problem could be prevented from worsening and resulting in a need for surgical interven- tion. It has been shown that surgical intervention is not the ultimate solution to UI. In the current study one woman with UI had already undergone three surgical procedures, without attaining total continence. If women could be treated with exercise, it would certainly lessen the costs incurred due to surgery and the purchase of incontinence pro- ducts such as protective pads. The study found that only 25.7% (9) of the women with UI had sought professional help. Luna et al. reported that 25% of the women with UI in their study sought medical help and the most common reason for seeking help was worsening of the problem.7 Hunskaar et al. found a consultation rate of 30%.4 Wong et al. found that 61.2% thought that leakage of urine was a normal aging process and over 90% of the women felt that education on incontinence was not enough.15 There appears to be low consultation rates worldwide and the reasons for this are the same among women of different cultures and back- grounds. Other researchers felt that primary healthcare providers lacked confidence in the management of UI and this led to under-treatment in those patients seeking help.4 The size of this study was a major limitation. It was difficult to obtain meaningful estimates of age-specific prevalence because the sample sizes were too small and differed greatly across the age groups. Unfortunately the study did not obtain information on the length of stay of each respondent in the area chosen for the study. This infor- mation would have given a clearer picture on whether the problems or lack of knowledge were due to deficiencies in services in this particular health district or elsewhere. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS UI is very common among adult women in this health district in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, with a prevalence of 35.4%. The women most affected were found to be those in the 41 – 50 year age group. The prevalence of UI among South African women appears to have increased over the past seven years, if the prevalence of SUI is to be used as an indicator of this increase. This study has also shown that knowledge of PFM exercises is poor and knowledge concerning management of UI among the health service providers needs to be improved. It is strongly recommended that primary health care providers familiarize themselves with incontinence and its management. The study also highlighted the lack of aware- ness among women, of UI as a disease. There is a clear need for public health programmes to address the problem of UI in the community by providing education on strategies for prevention and treatment, and to make women more aware of it as a medical condition that can be treated. Larger studies need to be done in other communities in South Africa and it will also be beneficial to determine the effect of UI on quality of life of women in South Africa. REFERENCES 1. Hay-Smith EJC, Bf K, Berghmans LCM, Hendricks HJM, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC. 2001. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane review. The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 2. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2. Department of Health. Medical Research Council. 1998. Maternal and Child Health. In: South African Demographic and Health Survey Preliminary Report. Chap. 7. 119-120. Macro International Inc. 3. Gashugi P, Louw Q. 2005. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among adult Rwandan women. S Afr J Physiotherapy 61(4): 6 – 14. 4. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. 2004. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU International 93: 324 – 330. 5. Perry S, Shaw C, Assassa P, Dallosso H, Williams K, Brittain KR, et al. 2000. An epi- demiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the com- munity: the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study. J Public Health Med 22(3): 427 – 434. 6. Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F, Boutin JM, Bertrand P, Lanson Y. 2002. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. BJU Int 89: 61 – 66. 7. Luna MTC, Hirakawa T, Nakano H. 2000. Urinary incontinence in Women seen in the obstetrics and gynaecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11: 277 – 281 8. Abrams P, Lowry SK, Wein AJ, Bump R, Denis L, Kalache A, et al. 2000. Assessment and treatment of urinary incontinence. Consensus. Lancet 355: 2153 – 2158. 9. WHO. 1998. World Health Organization calls first international consultation on incon- tinence. Press Release WHO/49. Available from www.who.int Accessed on 23/11/2005. 10. Aksac B, Aki S, Karan A, Yalcin O, Isikoglu M, Eskiyurt N. 2003. Biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 56: 23-27 11. Chiarelli P, Murphy B, Cockburn J. 2003. Women’s knowledge, practises, and intentions regarding correct pelvic floor exercises. Neurourol Urodyn 22: 246 – 249. 12. Morris K. 1999. Tackling the taboo of urinary incontinence. Lancet 353: 128 13. Hagglund D, Walker-Engstrom M, Larsson G, Leppert J. 2003. Reasons why women with long-term urinary incontinence do not seek professional help: a cross-sectional population-based cohort study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14: 296 - 304 14. Sand PK, Dmochowski R. 2002. Analysis of the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract dysfunction: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the inter- national continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 167 – 78. 15. Wong T, Mak HLJ. Cheon WC, Pang MW, Yip SK. 2005. Urinary incontinence in Hong Kong Chinese women: A prevalence, quality of life, and knowledge study. Presented at International Continence Society Conference 2005 Montreal, Canada. Category: Epidemiology and Outcomes Research. Available from www.icsoffice.org Accessed on 10/01/2006.