JUNE 1981 P H Y S I O T H E R A P Y 31

PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS TO  THE 14th NATIONAL COUNCIL 
MEETING OF TH E SOUTH AFRICAN S O C IE TY  OF PHYSIOTHERAPY

My p e rio d  as P re s id e n t o f th e  S o c iety  has b e e n  a 
w o r t h w h i l e  e x p e rie n c e  in a s m u c h  as i  h a v e  h a d  th e  
o p p o r t u n i t y  t o  ta k e  a lo n g  h a rd  lo o k  a t o u r o rg a n i-

S a\Vhy d oes a p ro fe s sio n  re q u ire  a n  o rg a n is a tio n  a n d  
how  does such a S o c iety  e volve? A  g ro u p  o f re s p o n ­
sible, stro n g ly  m o tiv a te d  a n d  h ig h ly  d e d ic a te d  p e rso n s, 
w i t h 'a  p a r tic u la r  v o c a tio n a l tra in in g , b a n d  to g e th e r a n d  
e n d e a v o u r to f o r m u la te  a c o d e  o f e th ic s a n d  a set 
of n o rm s to  w h ic h  p e rso n s w ish in g  to  jo in  su c h  an 
a s s o c i a t i o n  will u n d e rta k e  to  c o n fo rm . T h is will h ave 
th e  im m e d ia te  e ffe c t o f p ro te c tin g  th e  sta n d a rd  
a n d  th e  im a g e  o f th a t p ro fe s sio n  a n d , o f m o re  im p o r­

t a n c e ,  o f p ro te c tin g  th e  p u b lic  fro m  u n sk ille d  p ra c - 
'titio n e rs .

W h a t a re  th e  a im s of su c h  a S o c iety  a n d  h ow  d oes 
it a ch iev e  th e m ?  O n th e  o n e  h a n d , it p ro v id e s a fo ru m  
f o r d isc u ssio n  a n d  d isse m in a tio n  o f k n o w le d g e  a n d  
skills o b ta in e d  fro m  p e rso n a l e x p e rie n c e  g a in e d  fro m  
c o n tin u e d  re s e a rc h  a n d  e x p e rim e n ta tio n . O n  th e  o th e r  
h a n d , it p ro v id e s a fo ru m  f o r  th e  a p p ro v a l a n d  d is ­
cussion o f p o lic y  a n d  th e  im p le m e n ta tio n  o f such policy 
by m e a n s o f c o m m u n ic a tio n  w ith  its m e m b e rs .

T h e  S o u th  A fric a n  S o c iety  o f P h y s io th e ra p y  evolved 
in ju s t th is m a n n e r a n d  th e  f u tu r e  p ro g re s s o f p h y sio ­
th e ra p y  as a p ro fe s sio n  lies in its h a n d s.

W e a re  c o n s ta n tly  b e in g  re m in d e d  t h a t we h a v e  a 
“ p ro fessio n al s ta n d a r d ” to m a in ta in . T o  w h a t a re  we 
re fe rrin g ?  T h e r e  a re  b o th  a c a d e m ic  a n d  e th ic a l s ta n ­
d a rd s. A c a d e m ic  s ta n d a rd s  a re  th o se  ju d g e d  by e x a m i­
n a tio n  o f c o m p e te n c e , e x p e rie n c e  a n d  d e m o n s tra te d  re- 
sp o n sib ilty . T h e  q u a lific a tio n s  th u s  g a in e d  e n a b le  th e  
h o ld e r to re g is te r as a fu lly  q u a lifie d  p h y s io th e ra p is t 
(in o u r case w ith  th e  P ro fe s s io n a l B o a rd  fo r  P h y s io ­
th e ra p y  o f  th e  S o u th  A fric a n  M e d ic a l a n d  D e n ta l 
C ouncil). T h e s e  s ta n d a rd s  a re  b o th  je a lo u sly  a n d  
z ealo u sly  g u a rd e d  b y  th o se  re sp o n sib le  fo r th e  tra in in g  
p ro g ra m m e s in th is  c o u n try . I t is up  to  a ll th o s e  c o n ­
c ern e d  to  e n s u re  th a t  th e s e  s ta n d a rd s  a re  b e in g  m a in ­
ta in e d  t h r o u g h o u t th e  c o u n try .

W hen o n e  m a k e s an in d e p th  stu d y  o f th e  tra in in g  
kof th e  p h y s io th e ra p is t o f to d a y , o n e  a p p re c ia te s  ju st 
m ow  f a r  th e  p ro fe s sio n  has p ro g re s se d . T h e  em p h a sis 
has sw ung a w ay  fro m  th e  p a ssiv e  to th e  a c tiv e  a n d  
th e  tre m e n d o u s  e x p a n s io n  o f sc ie n tific  k n o w le d g e  a n d

re s e a rc h  h as fo rc e d  th e  a b a n d o n m e n t of m a n y  a n  
e m p iric a l te c h n iq u e . T h e  e le m e n ts  o f c h a n c e  a n d  g ood 
in te n tio n  h a v e  b e e n  firm ly  re m o v e d . T h e r e  a re  also 
m a n y  o p p o rtu n itie s  fo r  c o n tin u in g  e d u c a tio n  in  th e  p o st 
g ra d u a te  field s a n d  th e  e a g e rn e s s th a t p h y s io th e ra p is ts  
h a v e  sh o w n  in p u rs u it of th is  a d d itio n a l k n o w le d g e  
b e a rs  w itn ess to  th e ir  d e te r m in a tio n  to  f u r th e r  th e ir 
s tu d ie s a n d  sa tisfy  e n q u irin g  m in d s.

In  sp ite  o f w h a t w as said a t  th e  C o n g re ss, p h y s io ­
th e ra p is ts  a re  n o t b e in g  tra in e d  as m e re  te c h n ic ia n s . 
P h y s io th e ra p is ts , as n e v e r b e fo re , a re  ta u g h t to  th in k  
a n d  a c t fo r th em se lv es. T h e y  d e m o n s tra te  a n  a b ility  
a n d  e d u c a tiv e  skill w h e re b y  th e y  a re  a b le  to  assess 
a c c u ra te ly  a p a tie n t’s c o n d itio n  a n d  e v a lu a te  th e  n e c e s­
sa ry  t r e a tm e n t b a se d  o n  a so u n d  a n d  p e n e ­
tra tin g  w isd o m  o b ta in e d  d u rin g  c o n c e n tra te d  a c a d e m ic  
a n d  p ra c tic a l tra in in g  a t b o th  u n d e r- a n d  p o s tg ra d u a te  
levels. It is fo r th is re a so n  th a t th e  S o c iety  h a s m a d e  
its in itia l a p p ro a c h e s  to th e  m e d ic a l p ro fe s sio n  to  
a c k n o w le d g e  th e  c a p a b ilitie s o f th e  p h y s io th e ra p is t a n d  
p e rm it a w id e r in te r p r e ta tio n  o f o u r E th ic a l R u les, as 
h as b e e n  d o n e  in s e v e ra l o v e rse a s c o u n trie s .

T h e  e th ic a l s ta n d a rd s  o f p h y s io th e ra p is ts  in th is 
c o u n try  a re  c o n tro lle d  by a s tr ic t c o d e  o f  p ro fe s sio n a l 
e th ic s laid d o w n  by b o th  th e  S o ciety  a n d  th e  P r o ­
fe ssio n a l B o a rd  fo r P h y s io th e ra p y . T h e s e  p re sc rib e  th e  
re g u la tio n s  re la tin g  to  p ro fe s sio n a l p ra c tic e  a n d  d isc i­
p lin a ry  c o n tro l. It is th e  d u ty  o f  a ll m e m b e rs o f  a 
p ro fe s sio n a l so c iety  to  m a in ta in  th e  im a g e  a n d  s ta tu s 
o f th e  p ro fe s sio n  re g a rd le s s o f th e ir w o rk  s itu a tio n . 
P h y s io th e ra p is ts  a re  c o n s ta n tly  b e ing to ld  th a t th e y  
d o  n o t “ s e ll” th e m se lv e s su ffic ie n tly . T h is w as f o r c e ­
fu lly  u rg e d  by P ro fe s s o rs  A n d re  a n d  S a n d ra  v a n  d e r 
M e rw e  a t a re c e n t in te re s tin g , stim u la tin g  a n d  th o u g h t 
p ro v o k in g  c o u rse  on “ m a r k e tin g ” w hich th e y  c o n d u c te d  
fo r  p h y s io th e ra p is ts . By th is is n o t m e a n t th a t we m u st 
a d v e rtis e  o u rse lv e s in a n  u n e th ic a l m a n n e r  b u t o u r  b e ­
h a v io u r to w a rd s m e m b e rs  of th e  p u b lic  is o f v ita l 
im p o rta n c e . I t w o uld be as w ell to re m e m b e r th e  
w o rd s o f a p ro m in e n t A m e ric a n  r e s e a rc h e r in p r o f e s ­
sio n a lism , W a rd  D a rle y , w h o  says:

“ T h e  tru ly  p ro fe s sio n a l p e rso n  is o n e , w ho, by 
v irtu e  o f in te lle c tu a l c a p a c ity , e d u c a tio n  a n d  m o ra l 
o u tlo o k  is c a p a b le  o f th e  e x e rc is e  o f in te lle c tu a l a n d  
m o ra l ju d g m e n t a t a h igh level o f re sp o n s ib ility .”

Contents - Inhoud

P re s id e n tia l A d d re s s  to  th e  14th N a tio n a l C o u n c il 
o f th e  S o u th  A fr ic a n  S o c ie ty  o f P h y s io th e ra p y

A b s tra c ts  .................................................................. 32,
T he " H ig h  R is k ”  In fa n t ................................................
R e su lts o f E a rly  In te rv e n tio n  in th e  B a b y  w ith

C e re b ra l M o to r  D is tu rb a n c e  ..............................
The A t R isk A u tis tic  C h ild  a n d  H is F a m i l y ............

K e e p in g  in T o u c h  —  T he  N eed f o r  C o m m u n ic a tio n
31 in P h y s io th e ra p y  ............................................................ 40

5 4  A  R e a p p ra is e l o f E v a lu a tio n  o f F in a l Y e a r S tu d e n t
33 P e rfo rm a n c e  ..................................................................... 44

3 4  O b itu a rie s  .......................................................................... ....50

28 C la s s ifie d  —  V a c a n c ie s  ....................................................51

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

01
3.

)



32 F I S I O T E R A P I E JUNIE 1981

T h e  s ta n d a rd  o f p h y s io th e ra p y  in S o u th  A fric a  c o m ­
p a re s fa v o u ra b ly  w ith th a t of o th e r  c o u n trie s . H o w ­
ever, in  a c o u n try  no  lo n g er c o n sid e re d  a d e v e lo p in g  
c o u n try  b u t o n e  th a t is b e g in n in g  to  ta k e  its p lace 
w ith th e  in d u s tria l c o u n trie s  o f th e  w o rld , th e  scope 
a n d  fa c ilitie s a v a ila b le  fo r  th e  to ta l p o p u la tio n  a re  
so m e tim e s w o e fu lly  in a d e q u a te .

T h e  ra p id ly  d e v e lo p in g  s ta n d a rd s  o f  liv in g  o f th e  
B lack a n d  C o lo u re d  p o p u la tio n s  will in e v ita b ly  lead to  
a n  in c re a s e d  d e m a n d  fo r  sp e c ia lise d  m e d ic a l services. 
It is o ffic ia lly  re c o g n ise d  in S o u th  A fric a  th a t th e re  
is, a n d  in  th e  fo re s e e a b le  fu tu re , w ill be, a s h o rta g e  
o f sk ille d  p e rso n n e l. A s f a r  as p h y s io th e ra p y  is c o n ­
c e rn e d , in view  o f  th e  u p su rg e  to  U n iv e rs ity  e d u c a tio n  
a n d  d u e  to  in s u ffic ie n t fa c ilitie s a n d  lack o f s u ita b ly  
tra in e d  le c tu rin g  s ta ff, th e  a d m iss io n  o f a d d itio n a l s tu ­
d e n ts is o fte n  n o t p o ssib le , th u s im p e d in g  th e  flow  of 
q u a lify in g  p h y s io th e ra p is ts . T h is  m ak e s it e sse n tia l th a t 
th e  sk ille d  p e rs o n n e l a v a ila b le  a re  u tilise d  to  b e st e ffe c t, 
p a rtic u la rly  in th e  h o sp ita l s itu a tio n .

I f  o n e  is g o in g  to  o p tim ise  th e  use of h ig h ly  sp e c ia l­
ised p e rso n n e l, a lo w e r level o f c o m p e te n c e  m u st be 
c re a te d  to  c o p e  w ith  th e  w ork load. T h e  m e rits a n d  
d e m e rits  o f c re a tin g  a c a te g o ry  o f “ a s s is ta n ts ” h a v e  b e en  
d e b a te d  a t  le n g th  a n d  it w o u ld  a p p e a r  t h a t  th e  e s ta b ­
lis h m e n t o f such a c a te g o ry  is in e v ita b le . T h e  m o re

re c e n t flo w  fro m  th e  H o s p ita l S e rv ice  to th e  p riv ate  
s e c to r has, h o w e v er, c rc a te d  a n  im b a la n c e . E v e ry  e ffo rt 
s h o u ld  th e re fo re  be m a d e  to ste m  the flow  as a s h o r t­
age o f sk ille d  p e rso n n e l in h o sp ita l se rv ice s m ay 
e v e n tu a lly  p re c lu d e  a d e q u a te  su p e rv isio n  o f the e sse n ­
tial in -se rv ic e  tra in in g  w hich will be n e c e ssa ry  fo r  these 
a ssista n  ts.

A  n ew  era lies b e fo re  us. O n e  in w h ich we will h a v e  
to  p ro v e  a n d  m a in ta in  o u r e n h a n c e d  p ro fe s sio n a l s ta n ­
d a rd s  so t h a t  we m a y  n e v e r feel th r e a te n e d  o r  fe a r  th a t 
th e  im a g e  o f p h y s io th e ra p y  is in a n y  w ay in je o p a rd y  
by th e  in tr o d u c tio n  o f p h y s io th e ra p y  a ssista n ts.

D u r in g  th is  b rie f a d d re ss , I h a v e  trie d  to  stre ss th e  
im p o r ta n c e  o f p ro fe s s io n a lis m  w hich in c lu d e s y o u r 
im a g e . T h e  f u tu r e  o f p h y s io th e ra p y  in  th is  c o u n try  lies 
n o t o n ly  in th e  h a n d s  o f th e  u p p e r  e c h e lo n s o f the 
S o c iety , b u t in th e  h a n d s o f e ac h  a n d  e v e ry  m e m b e r of 
th e  p ro fessio n .

W h e th e r y ou re sp o n d  to  w ild, n e a r h y ste ric a l ex­
h o r ta tio n s , o r  to b u lly in g  ta c tic s o f d e le g a tio n , o r to  an 
e a r n e s t p le a  fro m  a n  o ld -fa s h io n e d , b u t n e v e rth e le ss 
d e d ic a te d , h a rd w o rk in g  a n d  s in c e re  p e er, m y m essage 
to  a ll p ro fe s s io n a l p h y s io th e ra p is ts  is R E S P O N D .

K . M . Levy

ABSTRACTS

Y ou n g, C heshire, P ierce and V ivian  (1977): Cervical 
A n k y lo sis w ith  A c u te  Sp inal Cord Injury. P araplegia 
15, 133 - 1 4 4 .

T h is  v e ry  c o m p re h e n s iv e  a n d  w e ll-d o c tlrh e n te d  d is ­
c u ssio n  o f th e  in c id e n c e  o f  sp in a l c o rd  in ju r y  in  c e rv i­
cal a n k y lo s is in c lu d e s  a  p a r a g r a p h  o n  “ p r e v e n tio n ” . 
T h is  s h o u ld  b e  r e a d  b y  all th o se  w h o  d e a l w ith  p e o p le  
su ffe rin g  fro m  c e rv ic a l a n k y lo s is  a n d  sp o n d y lo sis. It is 
q u o te d  h e r e  in  fu ll: “ P e rs o n s  w ith  c e rv ic a l a n k y lo s is 
c o m m o n ly  su ffe r lo w  v e lo c ity  in ju rie s , p a r ti c u la r ly  in 
th e  s p o n d y litic  g ro u p . O u r  co lle ag u e s in  rh e u m a to lo g y , 
in te rn a l m e d ic in e  a n d  g e n e ra l p ra c tic e  s h o u ld  b e  a le rte d  
to  th is  p o te n tia lity . T h e y  sh o u ld  c a u tio n  a n d  in stru c t 
th e ir  p a tie n ts  to o b s e rv e  su c h  p re v e n tiv e  m e a su re s as 
h a v in g  n ig h t-lig h ts  in th e  b e d ro o m , b a th r o o m  a n d  
d im ly -lit h a lls. H a n d r a ils  s h o u ld  b e  a v a ila b le  in th e  
tu b  a n d  sh o w er. P e rs o n s  w ith  c erv ica l a n k y lo s is  s h o u ld  
b e  in s tru c te d  to  u se  h a n d r a ils  w h e n  a sc e n d in g  o r  
d e sc e n d in g  sta irs . A ll s h o u ld  c o n s c ie n tio u s ly  use se a t 
b e lts w h e n  r i d in g  in a n  a u to m o b ile . A b o v e  a ll, th e y  
sh o u ld  r e p o r t  a ll in c id e n c e s o f h e a d  a n d  n e c k  tra u m a  
to th e ir  p h y s ic ia n  a n d  lim it c erv ica l m o tio n  u n til th e y  
c a n  b e  p r o p e r l y  e x a m in e d  b y  th e i r  p h y s ic ia n . T h e  
in itia l a tte n d in g  p h y s ic ia n  s h o u ld  ta k e  c a re  to  o b ta in  
c e rv ic a l film s, p a y in g  p a r tic u la r  a tte n tio n  to  p ro te c tin g  
v e rte b ra l a lig n m e n t in  th e  p ro c ess. S uch s im p le  m e a ­
su re s w o u ld  s ig n ific a n tly  re d u c e  th e  in c id e n c e  o f  s p in a l 
c o rd  in ju r y  in  th is  su s c e p tib le  g r o u p .”

T h e  d a n g e r o f  su c h  s e rio u s  tr a u m a  to th e  n e c k  in 
th e s e  h ig h -ris k  s u b je c ts is n o t suffic ie n tly  a p p re c ia te d , 
a n d  sim p le  p re v e n tiv e  m e a su re s like th o s e  o u tlin e d  a b o v e  
c o u ld  well sa v e  th e  p a tie n t f r o m  th e  d istre s s a tte n d a n t 
u p o n  f ra c tu re s  o f  th e  c e rv ic a l sp in e . T h e  s e v e rity  o f 
th e  d isc ip lin e s w h ic h  o f  n e c e ssity  a r e  im p o s e d  u p o n  
h im  in  t h e ir  tre a tm e n t c a n  b e  w e ll-n ig h  in to le ra b le  to 
th e  e ld e rly  p e rs o n  a n d  th e  diffic u lties h e  e x p e rie n c e s 
f r e q u e n tly  p r o v e  to  b e  in s u rm o u n ta b le  a n d  h e  
su c c u m b s.

H . C. W a tts

P ridm ore, S. A . (1978) H e a v y  R esistan ce E xercise 
W ith ou t A pparatus. A u s tr . J. P h y s io th e r ., 24, 1.

A  se t o f  tw e lv e  h e a v y -re s is ta n c e  e x erc ises h a s  b een 
d e s c rib e d  in w h ic h  a  k itc h e n  c h a ir  is th e  o n ly  n e ce ssa ry  
a p p a r a tu s . T h e i r  v a lu e  in  r e h a b i li ta t io n  a n d  s p o rts 
tr a i n i n g  h a s  b e e n  in d ic a te d . T h e  m e c h a n ism s in v o lv e d  
h a v e  b e e n  d iscussed.

M . J. R u n n a lls

R ob erts, G . M ., R ob erts, E . E ., L loyd , K . N ., Burke, 
M . S., E vans, D . P . (1978): L um bar Sp inal M a n i­
pu la tio n  o n  T rial P art II —  R a d io lo g ic a l A ssess- 
m bent. R h e u m , a n d  R e h a b . 17, 54.

In  a  tria l o f  m a n ip u la tio n  f o r  c h ro n ic  low  b a c k  p a in , 
r a d io g r a p h s  o f  th e  lu m b a r  s p in e  a n d  r a d io g r a p h ic  a ssess­
m e n t o f  sp in a l m o tio n  w e re  o f  n o  v a lu e  in  p re d ic tin g  o r  
asse ssin g  th e  re sp o n se  o f th e  p a tie n ts  to m a n ip u la tio n . 
A lth o u g h  r a d io g r a p h y  o f  th e  l u m b a r  s p in e  is a c o m ­
m o n ly  re q u e s te d  in v e s tig a tio n , it c o n trib u te s  little  to  
th e  m a n a g e m e n t o f  su c h  p a tie n ts  e x c e p t to  e x clu d e  
s e rio u s  sp in a l p a th o lo g y  b e f o re  a n y  f o r m  o f  p h y s ic a l 
tr e a tm e n t is c o m m e n ce d .

M . J. R u n n a lls

L iftin g , P h y s io th e r a p y  65, 23 8-251 & 2 77-292.
T h is  is a c o m p re h e n s iv e  se ries o f a rtic le s o n  th is  im ­

p o r ta n t  s u b je c t, w hich in c lu d e s th e  B io m e c h a n ic s, 
P a th o lo g y , a n d  A p p lie d  A n a to m y  a n d  P h y s io lo g y  o f 
th e  b a c k  in re la tio n  to  liftin g . A lso  c o v e re d  a re  B ack 
C a re  in In d u s try , A d v isin g  P a tie n ts  on  B ack C a re , a n d  
P h y s io th e ra p is ts  as T e a c h e rs  o f  th e  P u b lic . T h e re  is a 
v e ry  w ell illu s tra te d  p u ll-o u t b o o k le t w h ich a n a ly se s a n d  
d e sc rib e s in  d e ta il th e  m a n o e u v re s  in v o lv e d  in  effective 
a n d  sa fe  liftin g . S afe, th a t  is, fro m  th e  p o in t o f view  o f 
b o th  th e  p a tie n t a n d  th e  lif te r ’s b a c k . T h e  se ries p r o ­
v id es e x c e lle n t b a c k g ro u n d  k n o w le d g e  a n d  th e  b o o k le t 
a n  e q u a lly  g o o d  g u id e  f o r  th e  p h y s io th e ra p is t w h o  
finds h e rs e lf in  th e  p o s itio n  o f  te a c h in g  o th e rs , su c h  as 
n u rs in g  staff, th e  te c h n iq u e s o f  c o rre c t liftin g  p ro c e ­
d u re s.

H . C . W a tts

R
ep

ro
du

ce
d 

by
 S

ab
in

et
 G

at
ew

ay
 u

nd
er

 li
ce

nc
e 

gr
an

te
d 

by
 th

e 
P

ub
lis

he
r 

(d
at

ed
 2

01
3.

)