REVIEW ARTICLE • • ••Minimising radiation dose using pulsed digital fluoroscopy in the investigation of children Savvas Andronikou MB BCh, FC Rad (SA), FRCR (Lond) Marisa Mezzabotta MBBCh Department of Paediatric Radiology Red Cross Children's Hospital School of Child and Adolescent Health University of Cape Town Abstract Pulsed fluoroscopy is considered a requisite for paediatric fluoroscopy. The goal of paediatric fluoroscopic studies is to produce interpretable images (to answer a specific question) at the lowest possible radiation expo- sure. Digital pulsed fluoroscopy has the advantage of reducing patient dose while yielding diagnostic images. The radiologist is responsible for choosing the appropriate pulse setting and deciding between storing the image as a 'picture-grab' or a true 'spot-film'. We present a simple description of this technology high- lighting the advantages and disadvan- tages. We also describe in detail our recommended protocol for perform- ing a micturating cystourethrogram and a barium swallow/meal in chil- dren. Introduction In children, fluoroscopy is most frequently used in the investigation of urinary tract infection! (micturating cystourethrography (MeUG)) and in screening those children suspected of gastro-oesophageal reflux (barium swallow/meal). Paediatric radiology is especially concerned with minimising radiation dose because of the higher risk of radiogenic cancers in children due to medical irradiation." The goal of fluoroscopic studies is to produce interpretable images at the lowest pos- sible radiation exposure and dosage to the patient." Aim To describe the advantages of pulsed digital fluoroscopy and to pre- sent our recommendations for its use in imaging urinary tract infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux in children with respect to minimising radiation dose. 34 SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. February 2003 Discussion Most modern fluoroscopic sys- tems use digital technology (as opposed to analogue). These systems digitise the image offering the advan- tages of image enhancement (post processing) after the image has been stored, and result in a reduction of radiation dose.' Images can be stored as 'picture-grabs: 'cine-loops' or 'spot films'. A 'picture-grab' is a stored image of a single fluoroscopic frame at fluoroscopic doses. Diagnostic infor- mation is, however, not lost in the imaging of UTI in children.' A 'cine- loop' is a stored series of flouoroscop- ic frames that can be replayed in rapid sequence, much like a video clip, once again at fluoroscopic doses. A spot film is a radiographic film/screen quality digital image. Film quality is significantly improved compared with 'picture-grabs' or 'cine-loops: but there is added radiation exposure," Modern fluoroscopy systems also offer two modes of fluoroscopy. Either the X-ray beam is continuous or the X-ray beam is emitted for a few strobe-like X-ray pulses each second. Pulsing the X-ray beam can reduce radiation exposure to both patients and radiology staff," Dose is reduced by simply decreasing the fraction of time that the X-ray beam is emitted. A range of pulsing is offered, from 3 pulses per second (pps) to 30 pps, while the choice of continuous fluo- roscopy is also available.When using a 7.5 pps rate, the radiation exposure from fluoroscopy is approximately 75% lower than that from conven- tional fluoroscopy;' It is therefore up to the operator to choose whether to use pulsed fluoroscopy and what rate of pulsing to use in each individual case. REVIEW ARTICLE Other than radiation saving, pulsed fluoroscopy offers the advan- tage of better temporal resolution of moving objects.' Each image of the moving object is sharper than with continuous fluoroscopy because the object is relatively still during each short pulse of Xsrays." The disadvan- tage of pulsed fluoroscopy is that the fewer frames result in the perception of increased noise because the eye averages fewer independent frames,' as well as image animation (jumpi- ness)." The lower the pulse rate, the higher the perceived image noise.' The percentage of noise at 7.5 pps is twice that at 30 pps. Actual image quality is perceived to be noisiest but acceptable at 7.5 pps.' Most paediatric fluoroscopic investigations are performed as single contrast techniques with the aim of answering a specific question. In the investigation of UTI, the primary objectives are to rule out posterior urethral valves (in males) and to exclude vesico-ureteric reflux. During a barium swallow/meal the radiologist aims to exclude impressions on the oesophagus, malrotation and gastro- oesophageal reflux. The radiologist and clinician must then accept that noisier images can yield the same diagnostic information as conven- tional images even though quality may be decreased.' This is a psycho- logical barrier and radiologist accep- tance oflow-radiation images is a vital factor in pulsed fluoroscopy.' The following paragraphs and images describe our recommended method of performing micturating cysto-urethrography and barium swallow/meal at the Red Cross Children's Hospital. The protocols include the ideal choice of pulsing, the required views and the recommended method of image storage ('grab' ver- sus 'spot film'). The aim is to store adequate diagnostic information at the lowest radiation dose possible. Remember only to screen inter- mittently and to collimate tightly! Collimation can be achieved without radiation by using the positioning light. We begin fluoroscopy using 7.5 pps and this is changed when neces- sary. MeUG 1. After catheterising the patient maintain the right side down oblique position throughout the procedure. No preliminary film is necessary;" Begin to fill the bladder and 'grab' the bladder-filling image. This is intended to confirm the position of the catheter and assess for early vesico-ureteric reflux (Fig. I). The MeUG: Maximum 4lmeges; fwo 'pIcture- grabs' and fwo 'spot-films' Fig. 1. MCUG bladder filling: This oblique 'picture- grab' demonstrates the correct placement of the catheter by showing contrast fiJIingof the bladder. The position is kept oblique In readiness for the voiding phase. 2. Continue intermittent fluo- roscopy until the patient begins to void and perform a 'spot-film' while the patient voids with or without the catheter in situ (valves can be diag- nosed with the catheter in) (Fig. 2).10 Ensure that the back of the bladder is visible so that any vesico-ureteric 35 SAJOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. February2003 Figs 2a, b and c. Voiding image: 2a. 'Spot-film' in the oblique position demonstrates a normal ure- thra in a male. 2b. By including the posterior por- tion of the bladder, this 'spot-film' In the obI/que position demonstrates grade 1 vesicoureteric reflux during the voiding phase (arrow). Performing the contralateral oblique image is not recommended as the voiding phase may be missed, which Is impoltant for documenting ure- thral anatomy and is also the time when reflux is most likely ro occur. Minimal contralateral reflux may be missed, however this would not be con- sidered significant. 2c. Voidingphase of an MCUG recorded using a 'picture-grab'is of lower quality but is adequate for diagnostic information. REVIEW ARTICLE Fig. 3. Renal area: A 'spot-film' of the renal area is recommended after the voiding film to exclude contrast w/1hin the calyces. A 'picture-grab' may not provide enough detail to distinguish contrast in the calyces from other normal structures. reflux will be recorded and ensure that the tip of the penis is shown to exclude diverticula and anterior urethral valves. Optionally this could be a 'pic- ture-grabimage." 3. When voiding is complete, per- form a tightly collimated renal 'spot- fi.lm'. Detail is required for this image to identify contrast in the calyces and therefore a'spot-film' is recommend- ed, but not obligatory (Fig. 3).4 4. Screen over the bladder, and if residual urine is present in the blad- der, record this using a 'picture-grab' in the AP position. Avoid unnecessary spot films of the pelvic area for this purpose. Barium swallow/meal 1. The child is placed in the left true lateral position and is fed barium via bottle, syringe or straw. The full- column oesophagus is viewed in the true lateral position and a full-length image is stored as a 'picture-grab: which is adequate for evaluating the gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 4).8 This allows exclusion of vascular impres- sions on the oesophagus. 2. The patient is then turned to the right true lateral position with tight collimation of the stomach and duo- denal region. An image of early duo- The Barium Swallow/Meal: Maximum 4 images; al/ 'picture-grabs' Figs 4a and b. 'Picture-grab' of the lateral oesoph- agus: 4a. True lateral 'picture-grab' of the oesoph- agus with a full column of barium demonstrates the normal impressions on the anterior aspect (arrows). 4b. Lateral 'picture-grab' demonstrates the aspirated contrast in the trachea adequately in this child with incoordinated swallowing. Fig. 5. Lateral stomach and duodenum: A 'picture- grab' of the stomach and duodenum in the right side down lateral position demonstrates the nor- mal retroperitoneal course of the duodenum for exclusion of malrotation. denal filling is 'grabbed' (Fig. 5). This true lateral image gives information that the duodenum is oriented poste- riorly, to exclude malrotation. 3. Rapidly turn the patient to the AP position and collimate tightly to the stomach and duodenal C-Ioop. Include the base of the heart and make sure the spine is truly AP.A 'pic- ture-grab' of a full C-Ioop is then 36 SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY • February 2003 Fig. 6. Duodenal c-tooo: A 'picture-grab' of the contrast-filled duodenal c-tooo In the AP position is mandatory for exclusion of malrotation in every patient undergoing a barium swallow/meal, what- ever the indication. Fig. 7. Gastro-oesophageal reflux: If gastro- oesophageal reflux is present, a 'picture-grab' is adequate for recording this, as in this patient with contrast refluxing to the level of the hypopharynx. REVIEW ARTICLE stored (Fig. 6). Try to avoid contrast beyond the 4th part of the duodenum as this compromises your ability to confirm its position and therefore your ability to exclude malrotation. 4. The patient may now be given more oral contrast in the left lateral position to fill the stomach. In the AP position, the patient is screened inter- mittently for gastro-oesophageal reflux over 3 minutes (NOT 3 MIN- UTES OF SCREENING). If reflux is seen, then the image is stored as a 'pic- ture-grab' (Fig. 7). Reminders Remember that fluoroscopic doses (when used intermittently? are far lower than fluoroscopy plus 'spot- film' doses and that 'picture-grabs' are stored images of fluoroscopy. Reserve 'spot-films' for those situations when detail is required. If a pathologic abnormality is identified, further views may be warranted at higher flu- oroscopic pulse rates, with the use of continuous fluoroscopy or with the use of 'spot-films: available at the touch of a button. Also keep in mind that tight collimation reduces radia- tion and that a good paediatric radiol- ogist keeps his foot on the fluoroscopy pedal for only a few seconds at a time. Conclusion Digital systems have allowed us the opportunity to improve an image after it has been stored. The need for repeat images has been reduced using this. With cine loop technology, the radiologist also has the advantage of screening a full swallow or bladder void and then selecting the 'picture- grab' image from the series in retro- spect. If we as radiologists get through the psychological barrier of 'ugly' images, we can certainly reduce the dose to our patients. Currently, all male children with UTI undergo MCUG, but the trend with females is to perform lower dose scintigraphic studies. Monitoring pH and scinti- graphic studies are probably more successful alternatives for investigat- ing gastro-oesophageal reflux in chil- dren but offer little anatomic infor- mation. Fluoroscopy in children is still being performed extensively through- out the world with a relatively low pick-up of pathology. It is our duty to use our equipment and modify our techniques to reduce radiation expo- sure. Pulsed fluoroscopy is considered a requisite for optimal paediatric fluo- roscopy,' References I. Wilkinson AG, Mc Cafferty G. Pressure-assisted micturating cystourethrography: Reduction in duration of procedure and fluoroscopy time. Pediatr Radio/2002; 32: 783-786. 2. Brown PH, Thomas RD, Silbeberg PJ, Johnson LM. Optimization of a fluoroscope to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radio/2000; 30: 229-235. 3. Wessenberg RL, Amundson GM. Fluoroscopy in children: Low exposure technology. Radiology 1984; 153: 243-247. 4. Bazopoulos EV,Prassopoulos PK, Damilakis JE, Raissaki MT, Megremis SD, Gourtsoyiannis NC. A comparison between digital fluoroscopic hard copies and 105 mm spot films in evaluat- ing vesicoureteric reflux in children. Pediatr Radio/1998; 28: 162-166. 5. Gleijins J, Broerse JJ, Chandie Shaw MP, et al. A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at Il conven- tional and digital X-ray units in the Nether- lands. Br J Radio/1998; 71: 745-753. 6. Brown PH, Silbeberg PJ, Thomas RD, Strife JL, Towbin RB. A multihospital survey of radiation exposure and image quality in pediatric fluo- roscopy. Pediair Radio/20OD; 30: 236-242. 7. Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: Patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographies 2001; 21: 1033- 1045. 8. Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM. Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AIR 1996; 167: 1247-1253. 9. Ditchfield MR, De Campo JE Is the preliminary film necessary prior to micturating cystourethrography in children? Abdom Imaging 1993; 18(2): 191-192. lO. Ditchfield MR, Grattan-Smith JD, De Campo JF,Hutson JM. VCV in boys: Does the presence of the catheter obscure the diagnosis of posteri- or urethral valves? AIR 1995; 164: 1233-1235. 37 SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY • February 2003