CASE REPORT CASE REPORTCASE REPORT

In patients with a neck injury, the recommendation that positive 
findings on standard radiographs, or negative findings but a strong 
clinical suspicion of injury, are indications for computed tomographic 
(CT) scan, remains current.1 Although CT scanning is invaluable for 
defining bony injury, its inability to satisfactorily demonstrate the spinal 
soft-tissue structures, particularly the ligaments, makes it an unsuitable 
modality for excluding instability,2 as the following case illustrates.

The patient, an underground mine worker, sustained an injury to his 
neck in a rock fall accident. Cervical spine radiographs and a CT scan 
demonstrate bilateral fractures which have resulted in disruption of the 
bony ring of C2. This constitutes a hangman’s fracture (Figs 1 and 2).

The hangman’s fracture (traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis) 
represents fractures of the neural arch of C2 that are produced by a 
hyper-extension force. Although due to a rock fall in this case, it is 
an injury that is more commonly seen when the head or face hits the 
windshield or steering wheel in a motor car accident. The forced hyper-
extension results in bilateral fractures of the C2 neural arch. This is 
the same fracture as caused by judicial hanging, whence it derives its 
name.3

Neurological consequences of the hangman’s fracture are often less 
severe than may be anticipated, for two reasons. Firstly, the cervical 
cord occupies only approximately one-third of the antero-posterior 
diameter of the spinal canal at this level. Secondly, bilateral fractures of 
the posterior arch of C2 produce a decompression of the canal. These 
combine to spare the upper cervical cord.3

Our patient, who was neurologically intact, was treated with skull 
traction by means of cones calipers for 6 weeks and was then cautiously 
mobilised (out of bed) in a rigid neck brace. A repeat CT scan 6 months 
later demonstrates solid bony union at both the right and left C2 ring 
fracture sites (Fig. 3). The important question that should then be asked 
is: Does the demonstration of bony union mean that the injury is now 
stable?

Lateral views in flexion and extension are the recommended 
examination for assessing stability in the cervical spine and should 
be obtained in all patients in whom the need to exclude instability is 
clinically indicated. (They are not indicated in patients with clinically or 
radiographically unstable injuries.) The neck movements by the patient 
must be voluntary, and under no circumstances should an operator 
assist the patient with flexion or extension. The examination is also 
best carried out under the supervision of a radiologist or the attending 
doctor.

Figures 4a and 4b show the cervical spine in extension and in 
flexion respectively. In extension, the gap between the anterior margin 
of the odontoid peg and the posterior margin of the anterior arch of 
C1 measures 1 mm. However, in flexion the gap increases to 5 mm. 

In a normal adult, this gap should not exceed 2 mm. The increased 
separation between the anterior arch of C1 and the odontoid peg in 
flexion indicates that there is residual hypermobility/instability present; 
by implication, this is due to (an additional) injury to the transverse 
ligament.

The answer to the question is therefore that the demonstration of 
bony union on CT scan does not necessarily indicate that a spinal injury 
is stable. One should remember that although CT scan demonstrates 
the bony structures in superb detail, it does not adequately assess the 
soft-tissue structures, particularly the ligaments. It is in fact possible to 
have a completely unstable spinal injury as a result of ligamentous injury, 
without any visible bony injury on plain film radiographs or CT scan.2

1.   Lau L, ed. Imaging Guidelines. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Radiologists, 1997: 156 
(adopted by the Radiological Society of South Africa in 1999).

2.   Harrison JL, Ostlere ST. Diagnosing purely ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine in the unconscious 
trauma patient. BJR 2004; 77: 276-278.

3.   Grainger RG, Allison D, eds. Grainger & Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology: A Textbook of Medical Imaging. 3rd 
ed., vol. 2. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 1614-1615.

Assessing cervical stability: a reminder

Donald Emby, MB BCh, FF Rad (D) SA
Andrew Lancaster, MB ChB

AngloGold Ashanti Health, Western Deep Levels Hospital, Carletonville

Health Professionals International is a retained search com-

pany!specialising in the placement of Medical Professionals 

throughout New Zealand and Australia.

We are currently searching for Radiologists to join private  

Radiology Groups, with excellent working conditions & 

generous salary packages, throughout Australia.

Locations such as Sydney NSW, Central Coast NSW, and 

Gold Coast QLD. 

Assistance will be given with relocation, registration and   

immigration procedures, if required.

Australia
Radiologists Needed

F o r  m o r e  i n f o r m a t i o n ,  c o n t a c t 

D a r r y l  C o o k s l e y

D a r r y l @ n y h e a d h u n t e r. c o m

P h :  ( + 6 4 )  2 1  9 1 7  5 7 7

w w w . n y h e a d h u n t e r. c o m 

�         SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY • April 2008

Pg 6-7.indd   6 4/16/08   9:50:35 AM



CASE REPORTCASE REPORT

Fig. 1. Lateral shoot-through of the cervical spine. A broad vertical linear 
lucency (big arrows), which is consistent with posterior fracture of the C2 
ring, is demonstrated. A more anterior fracture of the C2 ring is also faintly 
visible (small arrows).

Fig. 2. CT scan through the body and dorsal ring of C2, showing fractures 
of the right lamina and left pedicle (arrows). (The classic hangman’s fracture 
consists of fractures through the base of the posterior ring of C2 on both 
sides. As the fracture on the right side in this patient is more posteriorly 
situated, this could technically be described as a ‘variant hangman’s 
fracture’.)

Fig. 3. CT scan through the body and dorsal ring of C2 at same level as in 
Fig. 2, but 6 months later. Both fractures are shown to have healed.

Fig. 4a. Lateral upper cervical spine in extension. The anterior cortical 
margin of the odontoid peg and the posterior cortical margin of the 
anterior tubercle of C1 have been highlighted and are indicated by the 
arrow. The gap between the odontoid peg and anterior tubercle of C1 
measures approximately 1 mm.

Fig. 4b. Lateral upper cervical spine in flexion. The gap between the 
odontoid peg and the anterior tubercle of C1 has increased significantly 
and now measures approximately 5 mm. This indicates abnormally 
increased mobility (i.e. instability) of C1 on C2.

�         SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY • April 2008

Pg 6-7.indd   7 4/16/08   9:50:38 AM