Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 1 | 14 ORIGINAL RESEARCH National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Ger- many: An exploratory qualitative study Thomas Grochtdreis1,2, Peter Schröder-Bäck3,4, Niels Harenberg2, Stefan Görres2, Nynke de Jong5 1 Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2 Institute for Public Health and Nursing Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; 3 Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Fac- ulty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 4 Faculty for Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; 5 Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Corresponding author: Dr. Thomas Grochtdreis; Address: Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Ham- burg, Germany; Telephone: +49 (0)40 7410-52405; E-mail: t.grochtdreis@uke.de Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 2 | 14 Abstract Aim: This study aimed to explore the German nurses’ perceptions of their knowledge, roles and experience in the field of national preparedness and emergency response. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was used with open-ended questions during semi- structured interviews with qualified nurses currently working in hospitals. The setting of the study consisted of wards of different hospitals in three northern federal states of Germany. The data analysis was done by summarizing analysis of the contents. From a convenient sample of n=31 hospitals, n=13 nurses were included in the study. Results: The median age of the participants was 45 years and 38% were female. Within the three professional socialization fields, knowledge, roles and experience, 17 themes were clustered. Conclusion: Within the themes of knowledge, role and experience in national disaster prepared- ness and emergency response, similarities and differences were explored in comparison to inter- national literature. Keywords: disaster management, disaster planning, disasters, emergencies, emergency prepared- ness, experience, knowledge, nurses, qualitative research, roles. Source of funding: This study did not receive any form of financial or other support. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the nurses who participated in this study. We would also like to thank the nursing managers of the hospitals, the head of the departments and the head nurses for approaching their employees and colleagues. Conflict of interest: None declared Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 3 | 14 Introduction Disasters have always been a challenge and disasters are to happen all over the world, in- cluding Europe and Germany. In the future, disasters will be likely to happen again all over the world. The situation in Germany may serve as an example for other European countries, when reviewing European disas- ters in past years and comparing the preced- ing situation to the current health and climatic situation. A concrete current example is the COVID-19 pandemic that lead to disasters globally, in- cluding Europe. Nurses already play a central role in disaster preparedness and management, as well as in emergency response, in many countries all over the world (1). All nurses, regardless of their level of professionalization, need to re- ceive disaster preparedness education in their undergraduate and continuous nursing educa- tion, in order to have a great pool of nurses during a disaster. In Germany, the law on health care explicitly mentions that the train- ing of nurses has to qualify to be actively in- volved in disaster preparedness and emer- gency response (2). However, involvement in disaster prepared- ness and emergency response is neither a par- ticular part of the formal qualification nor the regular professional practice of nurses in Germany (3). Care providers are considered important pro- tagonists of disaster preparedness and emer- gency response (4). In the literature, an essen- tial role is allotted to nurses for integrating communicating efforts and for having role competencies in disaster preparation (5). Nurses are able to reduce premature death, impaired quality of life, and altered health status, which can be caused by disasters (5). Health care professionals, including nurses, are feeling responsible for responding to disasters. However, nurses’ in- tention to respond to disasters, the needs of nurses who respond to disasters and other health emergencies, as well as the influence of the nursing shortage and the lack of educa- tion preparing nurses for disaster response are scarcely known (6). In order to prepare for emergency response, education within the field of disaster nursing is essential. In the USA, before 2001, few nurses received any formal education in the areas of emergency preparedness or disaster response, unless they served in the military, worked as pre-hospital providers, were em- ployed in a hospital emergency department, or participated in humanitarian disaster relief work (7). Occasionally, disaster nursing edu- cation is seldom provided at the basic nursing education level (8). It has become apparent, that there is a distinct need for disaster nurs- ing curricula and for preparation of nursing faculty members to teach disaster nursing in order to adequately prepare nursing students for possible disaster situations in future (9). According to the World Health Organization and the International Council of Nurses, nurses, as the largest group of health care practitioners, need to develop competencies in disaster response and recovery, but train- ing is often fragmented or not available (10). In order to understand the essence of national disaster preparedness and emergency re- sponse for and of nurses as well as the mean- ing they give to this topic in Germany, the following research questions were formu- lated for providing nursing practice and nurs- ing research with valuable information: ‘How do German nurses perceive the educational system in the field of disaster nursing?’, ‘How do German nurses describe their role in the field of national preparedness and emer- Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 4 | 14 gency response?’ as well as ‘What is the ex- perience of German nurses in the field of na- tional preparedness and emergency re- sponse?’. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the knowledge, role and experi- ence in national disaster preparedness and emergency response of German nurses. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was used with open-ended questions during semi- structured interviews with qualified nurses currently working in hospitals. Research design The field of nursing care might be well de- scribed by lived experiences of nurses work- ing in this field. In order to reach insight in these lived experiences, a careful description of ordinary conscious experience of everyday life is necessary. Based on the pre-formulated research aim, it was essential to identify pre- conceived beliefs and opinions to bracket out any presuppositions to confront the data in pure form (11). For not violating the induc- tive assumption of qualitative research, the- ory was used to focus the inquiry and to give it boundaries for comparison in facilitating the development of the theoretical or concep- tual outcomes. This means that the concep- tual framework of this research was used as a template, with which results will be com- pared and contrasted (Figure 1) (12). The conceptual framework consists of the three relevant fields of professional socialization: knowledge, roles and experience (13). Ac- cording to the conceptual framework, knowledge in disaster nursing supports nec- essary roles during a disaster and having roles during a disaster leads to experience. Based on a literature review, sub-topics for each field have been identified (14). Basic inter- pretivist research was followed, in fact to gather qualitative data and to analyse their content in a way that experiences, as well as perceived general roles, tasks and responsi- bilities as well as knowledge of nurses in the topic under research can be best described and interpreted. Figure 1. Conceptual framework [based on: Grochtdreis et al. (14)] Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 5 | 14 Setting and sample The setting of the research was different wards of hospitals in three northern federal states of Germany (Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony). Based on experience, for gathering enough data for a sufficient analy- sis, at least twelve qualified nurses were con- sidered to participate in the study. In order to have a comparable gender distribution be- tween the participants and qualified nurses in general, at least two male nurses were consid- ered to take part in the research. In Germany, approximately 14% of qualified nurses were male in the year 2010 (15) and it was antici- pated that the interpretation of experience of men and women is somehow different. Eligi- ble participants were qualified nurses cur- rently working in the field of nursing care. Furthermore, it was anticipated to select par- ticipants with different lengths of work expe- riences. The participants were not selected randomly, since it was more important to se- lect people who will make good informants. Good informants were defined as knowledge- able, articulate, reflective, and willing to talk at length with the researcher (11). The basic approach of the sampling was a convenient approach, based on a volunteer sample out of all hospitals. The volunteer sample was put together from nursing managers of cooperat- ing hospitals. In total, a convenient sample of n=31 hospitals was asked for participation. Of those, n=4 hospitals provided access to- wards potential participants (n=5 hospitals were willing to participate, n=9 hospitals were unwilling to participate, n=13 hospitals did not respond). Finally, n=13 nurses were included in the study. Data collection In order to elicit data in the study, nurses working in hospitals were asked identical open-ended questions during an interview. The specific questions were developed out of a literature review on nurses’ roles, knowledge and experience in national disas- ter preparedness and emergency response (14). Based on relevant topics extracted from the literature review, a semi-structured inter- view guideline with open-ended questions was developed and pretested (11,16,17). Dur- ing the interviews (male interviewer, TG), it was given as much time as needed to narrate to the questions of the interview guideline. All interviews were audio taped with a digital recording device and transcribed using the computer software f4 (dr. dresing & pehl GmbH, Germany) (18). Ethical considerations The ethical review committee of University of Bremen ascertained no reason for an ob- jection of the study. All interviewees gave written informed consent. A description of the purpose of the study was made available during recruitment, reiterated in writing within the consent form and verbally before each interview. Withdrawal of consent with- out personal consequence was possible at any time point and participants were aware of their freedom. Confidentiality of participa- tion was secured and participants were made aware of the anonymization of personal in- formation. Data analysis The data analysis was accomplished by using summarizing analysis of the contents of semi-structured interviews using Mayring’s method (TG) (19). Therefore, the interviews have been open coded as a first step, using the computer software MaxQDA 11 (VER- BIGmbH, Germany) (20,21). Out of these coded text parts paraphrases have been cre- ated. In a next step, these paraphrases were abstracted. Synonymous paraphrases were Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 6 | 14 deleted. These two last steps were repeated until a satisfactory level of abstraction was reached (19). Based on these abstracted state- ments, themes were developed, which were validated by the original text passages. All analyses were based on texts in its original language, translation into English took place while the first abstraction of paraphrases. As all interviews were conducted in German, presentation of original quotations in the re- sults was waived. Results Participant characteristics Characteristics of the participants are pre- sented in Table 1. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range 5) and 38% were female. The specialty areas of nurses were emergency care (n=5), intensive care (n=4), internal medicine (n=3) and orthopaedics (n=1). The median practical nursing experi- ence was 21 years (interquartile range 9). The majority of participants (n=11) reported one or two job specializations, including special- ization as head nurse (n=8) as well as in an- aesthesia care and intensive care (n=5). Par- ticipation in disaster nursing-related continu- ing education programs was reported by five participants with a mean participation num- ber of six education programs. Volunteer in- volvement in an aid organization was re- ported by two participants. Disaster preparedness and knowledge Within the first professional socialization field, knowledge, seven themes were clus- tered (Table 2). Table 1. Participant characteristics (n=13) Characteristics Median (IQR) N (%)** Age: years 45 (5) - Work experience: years 21 (9) - Female sex - 5 (38.5) Specialty area Emergency care - 5 (38.5) Intensive care - 4 (30.8) Internal medicine - 3 (23.1) Orthopaedics - 1 (7.7) Job specialisation* Head nurse - 8 (61.5) Anaesthesia care and intensive care - 5 (38.5) Disaster-related continuing education - 5 (38.5) Volunteer involvement: n (%) - 2 (15.4) IQR: interquartile range *Multiple response allowed **Absolute numbers and their respective percentages (in parentheses) Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 7 | 14 Table 2. Identified themes of relevant topics Topic Themes (I) Disaster preparedness and knowledge of German nurses Definition of a disaster Knowledge and skills Undergraduate nursing education Continuing education programs Disaster drills Willingness to help Disaster preparedness (II) Roles of German nurses during emergency response General roles of nurses Expectations of society and the hospital Role conflicts Assignments of medical tasks Special roles during a pandemic influenza (III) Disaster experiences of German nurses Work environment Nursing care Feelings Burdens and stressors Call of duty Impacts A dominant definition of a disaster was that disasters are man-made and technical. Fur- thermore, terror attacks, meteorological and natural disasters as well as biological and chemical disasters were described as possible disaster sub-groups. A majority of partici- pants defined a disaster as a mass casualty in- cident, which is hardly controllable without external assistance and accompanied by se- vere personal and material damage. Alterna- tively, disasters were defined as a situation with a large number of affected and/or killed people as well as an unpredictable, sudden and challenging event, lasting for a longer time. Knowledge and skills were perceived as highly necessary regarding disasters. Knowledge about the hospital emergency ac- tion plan and the corresponding roles during a disaster was considered essential. Addition- ally, knowing the hospital structures such as the hospital alarm system, the triage system and the supplies maintenance as well as knowing the federal state law for disaster control and about the duty to report to work were assumed important. Emotional skills, communicative and organizational skills, and professional skills were considered important for disaster preparedness. According to the participants, undergraduate nursing education did not address disaster nursing, yet emergency care and trauma care nursing has been addressed. However, com- municative and organizational skills as well as certain professional skills are well trained in undergraduate nursing education. A future need for an explicit disaster nursing educa- tion for undergraduate nurses was addressed. A need for nurses to be continuously edu- cated and trained in disaster nursing has been made clear. A minority of participants af- firmed that training and education in disaster nursing would be existent in their own hospi- tal. The plurality of the participants stated that disaster drills had not been performed in their hospitals yet. However, nearly every partici- Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 8 | 14 pant saw advantages in regular and manda- tory disaster drills, such as experiencing dis- asters in hospitals, recognizing roles and emotions during a disaster and practising and optimizing alerting, assembly, the hospital emergency action plan, communications and triage. Willingness to help during a disaster was taken for granted and as an ethical obligation by almost all participants. Willingness and unwillingness to help were influenced by several factors, such as preparedness, prior disaster experience, the scope and type of the disaster or being personally affected by a dis- aster. Professional disaster preparedness was per- ceived by barely half of participants, as they already had training in psychosocial emer- gency care, long-term caring experience or knowledge of the hospital emergency action plan and medical care. Furthermore, aspects of disaster preparedness were receiving regu- lar education in disaster management and knowing the own roles during a disaster. Half of the participants felt personally prepared, due to volunteer activity in a disaster relief organisation, knowledge about behaviour during disasters or information of the own family. Roles during emergency response Within the second professional socialization field, roles, five themes were clustered (Table 2). Most of the participants defined the follow- ing general roles during disasters: patient care, assistance during triage, on-scene com- mand, setting priorities, communication, public relations, clearing of space for addi- tional patients, recruitment and deployment of personnel. According to the participants, patient care will be reduced to psychological care and emergency care. According to the majority of the participants, nurses are expected by society and the hospi- tal to be willing to help and to stay able to cope during a disaster. Furthermore, nurses are expected to be prepared, knowledgeable and skilled and to give quick and high quality aid. In particular, the hospital was believed to expect professional care, psychological care, organizational capabilities, teamwork, cour- age and versatility during a disaster. Participants identified conflicts between their professional and private, either when they would be personally hit by a disaster or when they were single parents, have an infant or were responsible for the care of relatives. The assignment of medical tasks, such as tri- age or tracheal intubation, was perceived as “realistic” by the majority of participants. However, others stated that they could not imagine performing medical tasks, such as diagnosis or the administration of drugs, dur- ing a disaster. For the case of a pandemic influenza, partic- ipants identified that nurses were responsible for infection protection, hygiene, disinfection and of the correct use of personal protective equipment. Furthermore, nurses needed in- formation about the course of epidemics, conduct case investigations and educate col- leagues, patients and relatives about epidem- ics in order to calm their fears. Disaster experiences Within the third professional socialization field, experience, five themes were clustered (Table 2). Almost all participants described a (potential) work environment in hospital during a disas- ter as being tense, chaotic, rushed, panicky as well as crowded with patients and relatives. Moreover, a disaster was described an excep- tional situation for a hospital, accompanied Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 9 | 14 by an overwhelmed capacity. The work envi- ronment was also described as being dis- turbed by the military or the press. Nursing care was described as possible to a limited extend and controlled by priorities. According to the participants, different nurs- ing tasks were attributed to different groups of nurses during a disaster (Table 3). Participants described six domains of feel- ings they may experience during a disaster: Excessive demands, fear and panic, feeling of horror, feeling of terror, feeling of incapabil- ity, as well as positive feelings, such as feel- ing of security and a good feeling of being able to help. Furthermore, the larger part of the participants agreed that disasters are or might be physically and psychically burden- some. Nurses described four domains of dis- aster burdens: disgusting conditions, work environment-related burdens, care-related burdens and disaster impact-related burdens. The majority of the participants took it for granted to get to the hospital and to work be- yond regular working hours when they would be called for duty during a disaster. In addi- tion, there was almost no doubts that other nurses would get to the hospital, as well. Table 3. Nursing tasks during disasters for different groups of nurses Groups of nurses Nursing tasks and characteristics Nurses in general Be on call for duty during a disaster Perform delegated medical tasks Support each other and work together High flexibility Ready to work for extended periods of time Emergency nurses Triage Emergency care dependent on triage section Clinical nurses Expansion of capacity by discharging patients Assurance of the availability of supplies Assurance of the availability of medicines and medical equipment Professional care for present and additional patients Head nurses Ensure readiness of nurses Organisation and decision-making Deploy nurses according to their qualifications A specific part of the participants considered debriefing and giving feedback to the team after a disaster important in order to identify needs of colleagues. In addition, the evalua- tion of the disaster response and the pro- cessing of problems were considered im- portant. The following professional impacts of a disaster were described: disaster experi- ence, improving skills and knowledge as well as identification with the team and as a nurse. The following personal impacts of a disaster were described: strengthening personality, achievement of success, gratitude for life, nevertheless, also not wanting to experience another disaster anymore. Discussion Participants of the study were able to find definitions of disasters corresponding to the definition of Centre for Research on the Epi- demiology of Disasters (22). Both definitions emphasized unpredictability, the sudden on- set and the great personal and material dam- age. It is noteworthy that participants of the Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 10 | 14 current study mentioned that disasters are challenging local capacity, but not over- whelming it. Another study about nurses’ perception of disaster identified similar at- tributes to disasters as the current study (e.g. being unpredictable, sudden, unexpected or unpreventable) (1). Existing disaster nursing curricula set other priorities for education and training than the participants of the current study (23,24). Those curricula did not address the topics duty to work and hospital structures. How- ever, there is strong consent in the need for disaster nursing undergraduate nursing edu- cation and continuing education programs among the current study and international studies (1,25-28). In the literature, regular and mandatory disaster drills were demanded (29,30), as they were expected to improve emergency response capabilities (31-33). According to international studies, require- ments for disaster preparedness were pre-reg- istering in a disaster registry, having experi- ence in disaster nursing and continuingly tak- ing part in trainings and drills (1,31,33-37). Indeed, those requirements were in line with requirements stated in the current study. The requirements for personal disaster prepared- ness, however, deviated largely. In the litera- ture, for instance, the following requirements were described: having a go-pack containing essential personal supplies, preparing and protecting the family and having a personal plan for times of disaster (31,32,34,37-40). However, the majority of the nurses who par- ticipated in the current study did not feel per- sonally prepared. And those who did, thought they were personally prepared, if they merely informed their families about their role in hospital during a disaster. For personal and professional preparedness and in order to raise willingness to respond, nurses need to pack their essential personal supplies stand- ing by for emergencies, need to know that their families are protected and need to be registered in a disaster registry as well as know their relevant disaster plan. A personal disaster plan will help to arrange personal matters when responding to a disaster. In contrast to the responses of the participants of current study, it has been occasionally de- scribed in international studies that nurses will definitely be assigned medical tasks (34,41). Furthermore, different roles special roles during a pandemic influenza, such as contact tracing, engaging in surveillance and reporting, collecting specimens or adminis- tering immunizations, were described else- where (32). The disaster experiences described, for in- stance the descriptions of the (potential) work environment during a disaster, were in line with descriptions from other studies (33,42,43). However, potentially hazardous work environments due to inferred security or potentially lethal situations were not de- scribed by any participant of the current study (33). No other study did describe feelings po- tentially experienced during a disaster, as the current study did. One study described guilt when taking leave, concern about causing pain to patients, being overwhelmed by the tragedy, disgust and distress as feelings of nurses experienced during a disaster. Other studies described fear, stress and confusion (34), uncertainty, hopelessness, abandon- ment (44) and vulnerability (45) as feelings of nurses experienced during a disaster. The participants of the current study de- scribed disgusting conditions as a dominant domain of burdens and stressors during a dis- aster. In the literature, however, excessive de- mands (e.g., due to lack of satisfaction of basic needs, due to decline of infrastructure) were the dominantly represented domain of Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 11 | 14 burdens and stressors during a disaster (33,44-49). In the aftermath of a disaster, both, positive and negative consequences of disaster experiences, such as improvement of professional competency and rethinking of the commitment to nursing, play an important role in the current study as well as in the in- ternational literature (50). Limitations of the study First, the gathering of qualitative data and the analysis of their content were based on texts in its original language to best describe and interpret their content. Translation of descrip- tions and interpretations of the content might have leaded to a distortion or transformation of their true meaning. Second, this study is not representative of the German nursing population, but it explored the field of the role, experience and knowledge in national disaster preparedness and emergency re- sponse. The results of this study may not be representative for healthcare systems and ed- ucational systems in other countries. Last, different from expectation, a majority of nurses who participated in the study were male. It is possible that experiences of women were not adequately reflected. Fur- thermore, participant characteristics have to be distinguished for its overly large number of nursing specialists in emergency care and intensive care. Conclusion The results of this exploratory qualitative study implied similarities but also differences in the knowledge, role and experience in na- tional disaster preparedness and emergency response of German nurses, compared to other countries. There is a need of further re- search in order to further explore the knowledge, role and experience in a broader sample of nurses in Germany. The results of this explorative qualitative study can be used to design a national survey with representa- tive samples in order to expand and validate its findings. Nurses need to get involved in all aspects of disaster management and need to receive proper education and training. It is imperative that nurses know about their du- ties and their roles, especially within the exe- cution of medical tasks, before and during disasters and epidemics. Hospitals and fed- eral states of Germany need to organize reg- ular and mandatory disaster drills for nurses. Nurses themselves need to get informed about their possibilities for personal and pro- fessional disaster preparedness. Close attention is needed on ethical aspects and the assumption of responsibility by nurses during disasters. It is necessary that nurses know about feel- ings which can be created during disasters and have coping strategies for stressful and burdensome situations, which are applicable in exceptional circumstances and in the after- math, as well. Hospitals and the Federal State Offices for Civil Protection and Disaster Control need to be aware that not every nurse will anticipate getting to the hospital and hav- ing longer working hours during a disaster for self-evident. References 1. Fung WMO, Lai KYC, Loke AY. Nurses' perception of disaster: implications for disaster nursing curriculum. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:3165-71. 2. Bundesministerium der Justiz. Krankenpflegegesetz as promulgated on 16 July 2003 (Bundesgesetzblatt I, p. 1442). Berlin: Bundesministerium der Justiz; 2003. Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 12 | 14 3. Görres S, Magens D, Sander E, Harenberg N. Global Disaster Management and Nursing. Welche Aufgaben haben Pflegende in der Katastrophenhilfe? Die Schwester Der Pfleger 2010;49:60-2. 4. Drenkard K, Rigotti G, Hanfling D, Fahlgren TL, LaFrancois G. Healthcare system disaster preparedness, part 1: readiness planning. J Nurs Adm 2002;32:461- 9. 5. Veenema TG. Essentials of Disaster planning. In: Veenema TG, editor. Disaster nursing and emergency preparedness for chemical, biological, and radiological terrorism and other hazards. Springer Publishing: New York; 2007:3-24. 6. Stangeland PA. Disaster nursing: a retrospective review. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2010;22:421-36. 7. Littleton-Kearney MT, Slepski LA. Directions for disaster nursing education in the United States. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2008;20:103-9. 8. Yamamoto A. Education and research on disaster nursing in Japan. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23:6-7. 9. Stangeland PA. Disaster nursing: a retrospective review. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2010;22:421-36. 10. World Health Organisation, International Council of Nurses. ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies. Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 2009. 11. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, London: Walters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. 12. Morse JM. Designing funded qualtitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, London; 1994:220-35. 13. Hentz PB, Gilmore M. Education and Socialization to the Professional Nursing Role. In: Masters K, editor. Role development in professional nursing practice. Jones and Bartlett: Sudbury; 2009:127-38. 14. Grochtdreis T, De Jong N, Harenberg N, Görres S, Schröder- Bäck P. Nurses’ roles, knowledge and experience in national disaster preparedness and emergency response: a literature review. South East Eur J Public Health 2017;7. 15. Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheitspersonal nach Berufen. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2012. 16. Janesick VJ. The dance of qualitative research design. Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, London; 1994. 17. Swanson JM. Questions in use. In: Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ, editors. The nature of qualitative evidence. Sage: Thousand Oaks, London; 2001. 18. dr. dresing & pehl GmbH. Transcriptionsoftware f4 [Computer software]; 2013. 19. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz; 2010. Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 13 | 14 20. VERBI GmbH. MAXQDA – Qualitative Datenanalyse Software [Computer software]; 2013. 21. Glaser BG. Emergence vs forcing: basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1992. 22. Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2011 - The numbers and trends. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain; 2012. 23. Lund A, Lam K, Parks P. Disaster medicine online: evaluation of an online, modular, interactive, asynchronous curriculum. CJEM 2002;4:408-13. 24. Veenema TG. Chemical and biological terrorism preparedness for staff development specialists. J Nurses Prof Dev 2003;19:218-27. 25. Duong K. Disaster education and training of emergency nurses in South Australia. Australas Emerg Nurs J 2009;12:86-92. 26. Hilton C, Allison V. Disaster preparedness: an indictment for action by nursing educators. J Contin Educ Nurs 2004;35:59-65. 27. Stanley JM. Disaster competency development and integration in nursing education. Nurs Clin North Am 2005;40:453-67. 28. Whitty KK. Factors influencing the importance of incorporating competencies regarding mass casualty incidents into baccalaureate- degree nursing programs as perceived by currently employed faculty. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College; 2006. 29. Dickerson SS, Jezewski MA, Nelson-Tuttle C, Shipkey N, Wilk N, Crandall B. Nursing at Ground Zero: experiences during and after September 11 World Trade Center attack. J N Y State Nurses Assoc 2002;33:26-32. 30. Goodhue CJ, Burke RV, Ferrer RR, Chokshi NK, Dorey F, Upperman JS. Willingness to respond in a disaster: a pediatric nurse practitioner national survey. J Pediatr Health Care 2012;26:e7-20. 31. Al Khalaileh MA, Bond E, Alasad JA. Jordanian nurses' perceptions of their preparedness for disaster management. Int Emerg Nurs 2012;20:14-23. 32. Gebbie KM, Qureshi KA. A historical challenge: nurses and emergencies. Online J Issues Nurs 2006;11. 33. O'Boyle C, Robertson C, Secor- Turner M. Nurses' beliefs about public health emergencies: fear of abandonment. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:351-7. 34. Cole FL. The role of the nurse practitioner in disaster planning and response. Nurs Clin North Am 2005;40:511-21. 35. Hoffman DF, Nannini A. Planning, surveillance, and reporting for pandemic influenza: a briefing for advanced practice nurses. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008;20:11-6. 36. Orlando S, Bernard ML, Mathews P. Neonatal nursing care issues following a natural disaster: lessons learned from the Katrina experience. Grochtdreis T, Schröder-Bäck P, Harenberg N, Görres S, de Jong N. National disaster preparedness and emergency response of nurses in Germany: An exploratory qualitative study (Original research). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 26 November 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3972 P a g e 14 | 14 J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2008;22:147-53. 37. Peterson CA. Be safe, be prepared: emergency system for advance registration of volunteer health professionals in disaster response. Online J Issues Nurs 2006;11. 38. Chaffee MW. Disaster care. Making the decision to report to work in a disaster: nurses may have conflicting obligations. Am J Nurs 2006;106:54- 7. 39. O'Boyle C, Robertson C, Secor- Turner M. Public health emergencies: nurses' recommendations for effective actions. AAOHN J 2006;54:347-53. 40. Rebmann T, Mohr LB. Missouri nurses' bioterrorism preparedness. Biosecur Bioterror 2008;6:243-51. 41. Yin H, He H, Arbon P, Zhu J, Tan J, Zhang L. Optimal qualifications, staffing and scope of practice for first responder nurses in disaster. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:264-71. 42. Manley WG, Furbee PM, Coben JH, Smyth SK, Summers DE, Althouse RC, et al. Realities of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals. Disaster Manag Response 2006;4:80-7. 43. Secor-Turner M, O'Boyle C. Nurses and emergency disasters: what is known. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:414-20. 44. Shih FJ, Liao YC, Chan SM, Gau ML . Taiwanese nurses' most unforgettable rescue experiences in the disaster area after the 9-21 earthquake in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 2002;39:195-206. 45. Nasrabadi AN, Naji H, Mirzabeigi G, Dadbakhs M. Earthquake relief: Iranian nurses' responses in Bam, 2003, and lessons learned. Int Nurs Rev 2007;54:13-8. 46. Fahlgren TL, Drenkard KN. Healthcare system disaster preparedness, part 2: nursing executive role in leadership. J Nurs Adm 2002;32:531-7. 47. Geisz-Everson MA, Dodd-McCue D, Bennett M. Shared experiences of CRNAs who were on duty in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. AANA J 2012;80:205-12. 48. Giarratano, G, Orlando S, Savage J. Perinatal nursing in uncertain times: the Katrina effect. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2008;33:249-57. 49. O'Sullivan TL, Amaratunga C, Phillips KP, Corneil W, O'Connor E, Lemyre L, et al. If schools are closed, who will watch our kids? Family caregiving and other sources of role conflict among nurses during large-scale outbreaks. Prehosp Disaster Med 2009;24:321-5. 50. Shih FJ, Liao YC, Chan SM, Duh BR, Gau ML. The impact of the 9-21 earthquake experiences of Taiwanese nurses as rescuers. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:659-72. ________________________________________________________________________ © 2020 Grochtdreis et al; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At- tribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and re- production in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.