FEEDING HIV-EXPOSED.html
FROM THE EDITOR
FEEDING HIV-EXPOSED INFANTS
The most appropriate strategies for feeding HIV-exposed infants have
been a source of great debate in South Africa for years. During this
time policy makers, healthcare providers and (most importantly) mothers
living with HIV infection have been concerned and sometimes confused
about what is best for the HIV-exposed but uninfected infant.
Over the past few months, the announcement of a new national
policy promoting breastfeeding with daily nevirapine prophylaxis for
infants has presented a single, unified policy for services across the
country. This is leading to the rapid cessation of replacement feeding
provided through the public sector to HIV-infected mothers and their
infants. But far from ending the debate on infant feeding, these new
policies have refreshed the discussion. There have been a number of
newspaper editorials and media releases presenting strong voices in
support of, and cautioning against, the wholesale withdrawal of
replacement feeding.
A recent debate in Johannesburg held by the SA HIV Clinicians
Society provided a valuable summary of the key issues and a sense of
the complexity in any attempt to develop a nationwide infant feeding
strategy (for those who missed it, the presentations from the debate
are available on the Society’s website, http://sahivsoc.org). In
this issue of the Journal,
Haroon Saloojee and colleagues present one viewpoint on the new
national policies. Dr Saloojee was one of the participants in the
Johannesburg debate, and I hope that this opinion piece will help
generate productive discussions on a topic that clearly remains
unresolved. (Note that opinion pieces that include other perspectives
on the new infant feeding policies were solicited, but unavailable at
the time of going to press – we hope these will be available for
the next issue.)
Looking forward, the HIV Clinicians Society has been a leader,
nationally and internationally, in developing evidence-based guidelines
to address various issues in HIV treatment and prevention. Given the
ongoing debate, there is certainly scope for rational guidelines to
address the safest infant feeding choices across a range of scenarios.
We hope the Society will take up the challenge of developing guidelines
on infant feeding in the coming months, as this is an important time to
present a balanced voice on a topic that remains contentious.
Also in this issue, Dramowski and colleagues describe the
‘missed opportunities’ for reducing HIV-related paediatric
admissions at Baragwanath Hospital in Soweto. Among the missed
opportunities they document are the failure to deliver effective
prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) services, including
antenatal counselling and testing and antiretroviral interventions,
leading to preventable paediatric infections. This research took place
in a period when use of replacement feeding was common in Soweto, but
presumably this will change radically during 2012 under the new feeding
policies. Reading the articles by Dramowski and Saloojee together, the
future seems unusually opaque. Will we look back 10 years from now to
view the removal of replacement feeding for HIV-exposed infants as a
critical opportunity rightly taken to promote child health, or yet
another opportunity missed in our efforts to eliminate paediatric HIV?
This edition has many other exciting contributions. Innes and
colleagues ask important questions about stavudine dosing, and provide
an intriguing proposal for future research into a neglected issue with
major implications given the number of patients on stavudine. Boyles
discusses the ideal package of care for individuals who do not yet
require antiretroviral therapy (ART), an aspect of services that may be
sorely neglected in many parts of the country. An original article from
Peltzer suggests a very high prevalence of depression among new
HIV-infected mothers in KwaZulu-Natal, raising an important issue in
thinking about PMTCT interventions in the postpartum period. Cullen
presents a case report on an unusual case of optic neuritis in an
HIV-infected patient, and in a review article Garone and colleagues
discuss the progress to date and lessons learned from 10 years of
programmes delivered through Médecins Sans Frontières in
Khayelitsha, Cape Town. MSF’s projects in Khayelitsha have been a
vanguard for the development of models to deliver ART as well as
integrated HIV/TB care, and as we approach the 10-year anniversary of
public sector ART services in South Africa, this review provides an
important reminder of how far things have come.
Happy reading.
LANDON MYER
Editor
Associate Professor, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University
of Cape Town