DECEMBER 2014, Vol. 15, No. 4   SAJHIVMED     119

O
R

IG
IN

A
L

 A
R

T
IC

L
ELETTER

Managing the HIV-infected neonate: 
A rural doctor’s perspective

To the editor: Continued improvements for 
prevention of mother-to-child transmission 
(PMTCT) of HIV have dramatically reduced 
the number of vertical infections. However, a 
number of risk factors for transmission are still 

seen. There is an increasing awareness that more should and 
could be done to prevent transmission in these cases, and that 
targeted early diagnosis (soon after delivery) adds significant 
value in some infants to prevent prolonged nevirapine exposure 
leading to resistance, allows for rapid initiation of antiretroviral 
therapy as per the current guideline, and retains the infant and 
mother in care. 

Managing HIV-infected neonates is complex. Few 
antiretrovirals have dosages for the first 4 weeks of life. 
Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/solution, Kaletra, Abbott Laboratories, 
South Africa) is contraindicated for the first 42 weeks post 
conception. [1] With regard to nucleoside reverse transcriptase 
inhibitors, zidovudine is the only agent with adequate dosage 
information for term and premature infants, there is no dose 
for abacavir, and lamivudine dosage is lower than that for older 
infants. Nevirapine is safer in neonates, although therapeutic 
dosage and need for induction dosage for 2 weeks are uncertain. 
In the longer term, Kaletra is superior to nevirapine in infants 
regardless of prior nevirapine exposure, although there are few 
data in the first 2 - 3 weeks of life, with exposure being lower 
than in older infants.[2]

The social issues that have caused poor/incomplete access 
to prevention programmes often persist and complicate 
management. Many experienced paediatricians grapple with 
these issues, and there is currently no consensus on the best 
approach.  

Rural doctors are often confronted with challenging cases 
with respect to initiating neonates and infants on highly active 
antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and need to make pragmatic 
decisions. At Ceres Provincial Hospital, we have begun screening 
for mothers at increased risk of transmitting HIV to their infants 
in the labour ward. Their infants are given nevirapine plus 
zidovudine for postexposure prophylaxis, and we perform early 
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.

We recently identified our first infected neonate. The mother 
(a 28-year-old primigravida) booked early and rapid tests 
were negative at 8 and 32 weeks. She was retested during 
labour, and the rapid HIV test was positive. The mother 
received zidovudine, single-dose nevirapine and Truvada in 
the labour ward. The baby was delivered through caesarean 
section for breech presentation. The mother starting receiving 
antiretroviral therapy (ART) the next day. The baby received 
zidovudine and nevirapine at birth, and breastfeeding was 
commenced. An early diagnostic PCR was fast-tracked by 
contacting the National Health Laboratory Service. Fortunately, 

the mother was still hospitalised when we received the positive 
results; the baby was in its 5th day of life.

We contacted the Medicine Information Centre HIV hotline 
for further assistance, and were put in contact with a local 
paediatrician experienced in HIV care. As per telephonic 
advice, we initiated triple therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine 
and full doses of nevirapine on day 6 of life. Kaletra was 
prescribed at the appropriate age. The mother was educated 
and instructed on how to give ART correctly, and continued 
with her own medication and exclusive breastfeeding. 

Mother and baby are being followed at the local well baby 
clinic and the regional HIV clinic; they attend regularly and are 
healthy with no side-effects. The doctor caring for the mother 
and infant communicates regularly with the nurses in the 
mother’s community. The viral load of the mother and infant 
will be measured at 4 months of therapy.

The key lessons learned from this case are shown below:
• Healthcare providers should not be distracted by negative 

HIV tests in pregnancy. 
• Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of HIV 

acquisition. In addition, we should emphasise safe sex 
practices and recommend partner testing.

• Rural doctors and nurses can implement expanded preven-
tion and early diagnosis to infants at increased risk.

• There is still a need for point-of-care testing to allow for 
rapid management of infants and their mothers. 

• Communication between staff at the different service points 
is essential to ensure good follow-up care. 

• Although immediate access to ART should be the goal, 
allowing space and time to come to terms with the diagnosis 
may be needed.

• Transfer of infants to specialist centres is unnecessary prov-
ided there is a specific doctor or nurse to assume responsibility 
for the infant, and specialist advice is readily available. 

• There is a need for pragmatic guidelines for the management 
of term and preterm infants.

If we are unable to prevent vertical HIV transmission, the next 
best option is early recognition and rapid access to therapy.  

D Demas,1 H Rabie,2 M F Cotton2
1  District Health Service (Boland), Ceres Provincial Hospital, 

Ceres, South Africa
2  Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch 

University, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

References
1. AbbVie. Lopinavir/ritonavir package information. http://www.rxabbvie.

com/pdf/kaletratabpi.pdf (accessed June 2014)
2. Palumbo P, Lindsey JC, Hughes MD, et al. Antiretroviral treatment 

for children with peripartum nevirapine exposure. N Engl J Med 
2010;363(16):1510-1520. 

L
E

T
T

E
R