Spektrum Industri Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 ISSN 1693-6590 http://journal3.uad.ac.id/index.php/spektrum https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.97 spektrum.industri@ie.uad.ac.id Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq a,1,*, Hasan Mastrisiswadi a,b, Herianto a a Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No.2, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 b Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Jl. Babarsari 2, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 1 ahmadamirudinas@gmail.com * Corresponding Author 1. Introduction 3D Printing Technology, or Additive Manufacturing (AM), is a trigger of industry 4.0 (Malik et al., 2022) (Vo, 2022), which has advantages in the form and personalization of materials (Desu et al., 2021) (Geisleir et al., 2022). The technology is based on computation to build 3-dimensional solid structures on a sheet-by-sheet basis (Portanguen et al., 2019) and is now widely used in the military (Campbell et al., 2012), medical (Liu & Evans, 2016), aircraft (Paolillo et al., 2021), materials science (Shen et al., 2023), and food (Piyush et al., 2019) (Kewuyemi et al., 2021) (Tejada-Ortigoza & Cuan- Urquizo, 2022). Food 3D Printing is new technology (He et al., 2020) that is used to make food with custom forms and desired nutrients (Zhang et al., 2022) (Brunner et al., 2018). The research of ingredients used also ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history Received January 18, 2023 Revised March 14, 2023 Accepted March 27, 2023 This research analyzes pancake batter and discovers the ideal printing parameters on the HALTech Printcake machine, the machine was newly developed and hasn’t been optimize yet where the prior research on 3D Printing pancake batter never been done. This research aims to optimize the printing parameter in order to get pancake close to proposed design. 3 Level full factorial were carried out to understand the response of all the available combination of parameter. There are 2 parameters proposed on this research velocity: 50 mm/s, 60 mm/s, 70 mm/s, and micropump voltage: 3.5 volts, 4 volts, and 4.5 volts. Balance between two parameters needed in order to get the best printing result, Velocity refer to the movement speed of the axis and the micropump voltage refer to how many materials will be extruded or flow rate. Design specimen of a straight line 8 cm long and 0.35 cm wide proposed. The results showed that the length error was not significantly affected either by the velocity of the axis movement or the micropump voltage, whereas for the printed area error, it was significantly affected by the velocity, and for the micropump voltage, it did not have a significant effect. Optimized combination of parameter obtain in this research was velocity of 70 mm/s, and a micropump voltage of 4 volts and overall was able to print better specimen then the average experiment in term of printed area error. Keywords Full Factorial; Printcake; Micropump Voltage; Velocity; Food 3D Printing This is an open-access article under the CC–BY-SA license. http://journal3.uad.ac.id/index.php/spektrum https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.97 https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.97 mailto:spektrum.industri@ie.uad.ac.id mailto:*ahmadamirudinas@gmail.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 86 Spektrum Industri ISSN 1693-6590 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) continues to grow, starting from vegetables such as carrots (Guénard-Lampron et al., 2021), peas (Chuanxing et al., 2018) (Cheng-Rong TSAI & Yung-Kai LIN, 2022), and bok choy (Pant et al., 2021), then fruit such as mango (Montoya et al., 2021), lemon (Yang et al., 2018), strawberry (Tabriz et al., 2021), and cakes (Pulatsu et al., 2020), (Oliveira et al., 2021). Current study on 3D Printing food can be categorized into 3 main shape of material, it is puree (Cazzaniga et al., 2021), gel (Cheng-Rong TSAI & Yung-Kai LIN, 2022) (Paolillo et al., 2021) (Maniglia et al., 2020), dough and batter (Pulatsu et al., 2020) (Pulatsu et al., 2021), the research focus on getting a proper ingredient (Derossi et al., 2020) or printing parameter such as nozzle size (Guénard-Lampron et al., 2021), printing speed, and extrusion rate (Yang et al., 2018) etc. 3D Printing in Indonesia is starting to develop, and this is indicated by the launch of Making Indonesia 4.0 on April 4, 2018, from the government to build five manufacturing sectors, namely food and beverage, textile, automotive, chemical, and electronics, using the Internet of Things (IoT) technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Human-Machine Interface, robotic and sensor technology, and 3D Printing technology (Kemenprin, 2019), Together with this government policy 3D printing of food become an opportunity and challenge (Burke-Shyne et al., 2020), there are many 3D printing startup companies are starting to develop in Indonesia. HALTech is one of new start up in Indonesia, it is located in the Special Region of Yogyakarta and engaged in the 3D Printing production and education focus on various material from resin, PLA and even food such as chocolate and cake. Their latest work was a printcake it was 3D printing machine based on the x, y-axis, with a static z-axis working on a grbl firmware to make pancakes according to the desired design, the printing system work using batter pushed to the extruder using air compressor or pneumatic dispensing system. Until now the machine only been operated on a default setting parameter and haven’t been optimize yet, similar research on optimizes 3D Printing using parameter such as printing speed and extrusion rate but never been used on a batter type material for pancake. Based on this background the research contribution is to optimize the parameter of the printcake and gain the ideal parameter to print custom pancakes. 2. Method 2.1. Research Procedure The research begins with a literature study to determine the position of previous research, such as what materials were used, and whether similar research has been carried out. Next, the ingredients is determined to make the batter and the parameters needed in this study. The 3-level full factorial was carried out in this research to analyze the printed result. This method is often used in experiments involving many factors or parameters. Most studies use two levels, namely high and low (Tavares Luiz et al., 2021), while this study uses three levels it is high, medium, and low, then uses 3 times replication. the flowchart of the research can be seen on Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Research procedure ISSN 1693-6590 Spektrum Industri 87 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) The full factorial processing method uses Minitab 19 software which includes a normality test to find out whether the data is normally distributed. Then if it meets the requirements, it is continued with the analysis with the ANOVA test to find out the parameters that affect the extrusion result and interaction plot to understand the interaction of each parameter, and the final result is parameter optimization. 2.2. Parameter Printcake operates using a grbl controller connected to a laptop to input the g-code. Besides the software, it is also necessary to set the engine parameters. In this study, the parameters used are velocity and micropump voltage, machine been run on a default minimum setting using velocity of 50 mm/s and the micropump voltage 3.5 volt. Velocity parameter refer to how fast the axis going to move and the micropump voltage refer to how many batter will be extrude. The available nozzle diameter was 3.5 mm and it’s remained unchanged throughout the research same with the bed temperature. The research using 3-level full factorial then a 3-level different parameter needed, beside the default parameter the other 2 level parameter will be their increment, thus the combination of the study can be seen on Table 1. Table 1. Parameter Combination Parameter Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Velocity 50 60 70 Micropump Voltage 3.5 4 4.5 2.3. Material and Preparation Default batter ingredients been use on the machine was consist of 240 grams of flour, 280 grams of white milk, one egg, six tablespoons of sugar, one tablespoon of salt, one tablespoon of baking powder, and two tablespoons of vegetable oil. The research will use the same ingredient as the default without any change on the composition. The ingredients are mixed evenly using a mixer for about 10 to 15 minutes and were obtained from a local cake supply store. 3. Results and Discussion The specimens of a straight line 8 cm long, and 3.5 mm wide, with the dimensions of the specimens, have an area of 2.8 cm2 were used in this research. Based on the experimental results, it is known that the lowest area error is 5.75%, and the highest area error is 74.11%, while for the lowest length is 0.00%, and the highest length error is 22.19%. Even though the lowest length error is 0%, this does not indicate that the parameter is optimal because it is still affected by the printed area error. Histogram of Length error and Printed area error shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2. Histogram of Length error and Printed area error 88 Spektrum Industri ISSN 1693-6590 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) Based on the histogram, it can be concluded that most of the extrusion results have a length error value below 11.25% with 2 data above it, while for wide error, most of the data is below 35% with 9 data above it, when viewed from this it can be seen that the error results are stable in that area. The results of data extrusion can be seen in Table 2. The data was then tested using DOE Full Factorial on Minitab 19 software. Based on the normality test results, the P-value for the length error was 0.24, and the area error was 0.093. The data set has a P-value above 0.05, so it can be interpreted that the data set is normally distributed with a confidence level of 95% so that it meets the requirements for further testing using ANOVA to analyze the significance of each parameter. Pareto Chart of Length error and Printed area error shown in Fig. 3. Table 2. Extrusion results Velocity Volt Time Length Printed Area Length Error Printed Area Error 50 3.5 9.27 8.35 3.343 4% 19% 4 9.27 6.225 4.848 (-)22% 73% 4.5 9.27 7.47 3.335 (-)7% 19% 60 3.5 9.21 8 3.378 0% 21% 4 9.21 8.7 3.677 9% 31% 4.5 9.21 8.7 4.323 9% 54% 70 3.5 9.16 8.787 3.042 10% 9% 4 9.16 8.27 3.309 3% 18% 4.5 9.16 8.88 3.632 11% 30% 50 3.5 9.27 8.825 3.62 10% 29% 4 9.27 8.7 3.441 9% 23% 4.5 9.27 8.8 3.804 10% 36% 60 3.5 9.21 8.2 3.921 2% 40% 4 9.21 8.19 4.593 2% 64% 4.5 9.21 8.37 3.999 5% 43% 70 3.5 9.16 9.119 3.531 14% 26% 4 9.16 8,677 3.686 8% 32% 4.5 9.16 8.09 3.65 1% 30% 50 3.5 9.27 8.25 3.432 3% 23% 4 9.27 8.729 4.748 9% 70% 4.5 9.27 8.6 4.875 8% 74% 60 3.5 9.21 8.4 3.528 5% 26% 4 9.21 7.945 3.284 (-)1% 17% 4.5 9.21 8.68 4.511 9% 61% 70 3.5 9.16 7.91 3.137 1% 12% 4 9.16 7.65 2.961 4% 6% 4.5 9.16 7.94 3.647 1% 30% Fig. 3. Pareto Chart of Length error and Printed area error The most significant parameter or the parameter that has significant influence can be read using ANOVA. It is shown with a p-value below 0.05, which means that the parameter significantly influences the extrusion result. Based on the Pareto chart, the parameter length error does not ISSN 1693-6590 Spektrum Industri 89 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) significantly influence. It can also be seen in the ANOVA results that the velocity parameter has a p- value of 0.13, and the voltage has a p-value of 0.665. On the other hand, the printed area error based on the Pareto chart, there is a parameter that has a significant influence. The velocity parameter has a p-value of 0.047. Interaction Plot for Length error and Printed area error shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4. Interaction Plot for Length error and Printed area error When we analyze parameter using full factorial the interaction plot of each dependent variable will be created to identify, even based on the Fig. 3 dependent variable of length error doesn’t have any significant influence it will be identified to understand the response or change parameter in length error, the only interaction seen on the length error was when we increase the velocity from 50 mm/s to 60 mm/s it will decrease the error value and the lowest error can be obtained using 3.5 volt of micropump voltage. On the other hand, he interaction of printed area error show regardless of the velocity used, the micropump voltage of 3.5 volt always give the lowest printed area error value and the combination with velocity 70 mm/s create the lowest printed area error value. Other relationship between parameters in the printed area error show that regardless of the micropump voltage when we increase the velocity from 60 to 70 the printed area error created will be lowered. Based on these results, it can be interpreted that the extrusion of batter is suitable. The number of error values is generated when the velocity is not balanced with the value of the micropump voltage. The voltage of the micropump influence the amount of batter that comes out during extrusion, so when the velocity is not well balanced with the amount of batter being extruded, a printed area error will form. If the balance gap between velocity and voltage is big, then the resulting error will be significant also. The bigger the gap, the bigger error will occur this error also in line with the lemon gel system (Yang et al., 2018). Despite different material type were used but the main error happens to be the same The optimal parameter can be determined with the lowest extrusion error value. This can be done using Minitab 19. In the full factorial test, there is a response optimization feature by obtaining desirability values for each data set. Optimization targets by minimizing the error value on area error and length error, a solution with a desirability value of 78% is obtained from the combination of velocity 70 mm/s and 4 volts voltage and the detailed solution can be seen on Table 3. Table 3. Optimization parameter result Solution Velocity Volt Area Fit Error Length Fit Error Composite Desirability 1 70 4 0.185238 0.0540417 0.784269 2 60 3.5 0.288929 0.0250000 0.766103 3 50 3.5 0.237500 0.0593750 0.734533 4 70 3.5 0.155952 0.0831667 0.731522 5 70 4.5 0.301071 0.0429167 0.720537 Further experiment using optimized setting was carried out in order to validate the obtained parameter from the optimization. A 3 times replication of optimized parameter was done, average length error was 8.27% it is bigger than the average experiment and the prediction, but the printed 90 Spektrum Industri ISSN 1693-6590 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) area error was better because the error of the optimized parameter 13.6% where it was lower than the average experiment also lower than its prediction and the detailed result can be seen on Table 4. Although the research has been done properly to optimize the printing parameter, further research may need to optimize the batter properties same with the research on batter for a snack (Radoš et al., 2022) even though the material used was different but the main material was closely similar. Table 4. Optimization printing experiment Average Printing Result Length Error Printed Area Error Experiment 6.6% 33.9% Optimized Prediction 5.4% 18.5% Optimized experiment 8.27% 13.6% 4. Conclusion It was found that the optimized parameter for printcake using velocity of 70 mm/s and micropump voltage of 4 volt was suitable for the pancake printing in this study, even though the same material never been done before but the error occurred was closely related to other food printing material. Producing ideal printed pancake that similar with the proposed design was necessary to set the appropriate parameters to get ideal printed results, and a balance between velocity and micropump voltage obtained from the optimization parameter. From the research we can see that the result of optimized parameter was good, even the result of length error little bit bigger then the experiment and it’s predicted optimized result but it was able to print pancake design with the average error of printed area 13.6% where the average experiment printed area error around 33.9% and prediction of optimization was 18.5%. Author Contribution: All authors contributed equally to the main contributor to this paper. All authors read and approved the final paper. Funding: This research received no external funding. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References Brunner, T. A., Delley, M., & Denkel, C. (2018). Consumers’ attitudes and change of attitude toward 3D - printed food. Food Quality and Preference, 68, 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.12.010. Burke-Shyne, S., Gallegos, D., & Williams, T. (2021). 3D food printing: Nutrition opportunities and challenges. British Food Journal, 123(2), 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2020-0441. Campbell, I., Bourell, D., & Gibson, I. (2012). Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid prototyping journal, 18(4), 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211231563. Cazzaniga, A., Hase, S., Brousse, M. M., & Linares, A. R. (2021). Properties of dehydrated cassava puree and wheat flour blends and its relationship with the texture of doughs. Lwt, 136, 110310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110310. Cheng-Rong, T. S. A. I., & Yung-Kai, L. I. N. (2022). Artificial steak: A 3D printable hydrogel composed of egg albumen, pea protein, gellan gum, sodium alginate and rice mill by-products. Future Foods, 5, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100121. Chuanxing, F., Qi, W., Hui, L., Quancheng, Z., & Wang, M. (2018). Effects of pea protein on the properties of potato starch-based 3D printing materials. International Journal of Food Engineering, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2017-0297. Derossi, A., Caporizzi, R., Oral, M. O., & Severini, C. (2020). Analyzing the effects of 3D printing process per se on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cereal food products. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 66, 102531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102531. Desu, P. K., Maddiboyina, B., Vanitha, K., Rao Gudhanti, S. N., Anusha, R., & Jhawat, V. (2021). 3D Printing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.12.010 https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2020-0441 https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211231563 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100121 https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2017-0297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102531 ISSN 1693-6590 Spektrum Industri 91 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) Technology in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Advantages and Challenges. Current Drug Targets, 22(16), 1901-1914. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450122666210120142416. Geisler, E., Lecompère, M., & Soppera, O. (2022). 3D printing of optical materials by processes based on photopolymerization: materials, technologies, and recent advances. Photonics Research, 10(6), 1344- 1360. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.453338. Guénard-Lampron, V., Masson, M., Leichtnam, O., & Blumenthal, D. (2021). Impact of 3D printing and post- processing parameters on shape, texture and microstructure of carrot appetizer cake. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 72, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102738. He, C., Zhang, M., & Fang, Z. (2020). 3D printing of food: pretreatment and post-treatment of materials. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(14), 2379-2392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1641065. Kemenprin. (2019). Making Indonesia. Making Indonesia, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719370. Kewuyemi, Y. O., Kesa, H., & Adebo, O. A. (2022). Trends in functional food development with three- dimensional (3D) food printing technology: Prospects for value-added traditionally processed food products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 62(28), 7866-7904. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1920569. Kumar, R., & Kumar, R. (2020). 3D printing of food materials: A state of art review and future applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 1463-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.005. Liu, W., & Evans, S. (2016). How companies respond to the emergence of 3D printing technology. ECEEE Industrial Summer Study Proceedings. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 305-310. https://www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Industrial_Summer_Study/2016 Malik, A., Haq, M. I. U., Raina, A., & Gupta, K. (2022). 3D printing towards implementing Industry 4.0: sustainability aspects, barriers and challenges. Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application, 49(3), 491-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/ir-10-2021-0247. Maniglia, B. C., Lima, D. C., Junior, M. D. M., Le-Bail, P., Le-Bail, A., & Augusto, P. E. (2020). Preparation of cassava starch hydrogels for application in 3D printing using dry heating treatment (DHT): A prospective study on the effects of DHT and gelatinization conditions. Food Research International, 128, 108803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108803. Montoya, J., Medina, J., Molina, A., Gutiérrez, J., Rodríguez, B., & Marín, R. (2021). Impact of viscoelastic and structural properties from starch-mango and starch-arabinoxylans hydrocolloids in 3D food printing. Additive Manufacturing, 39, 101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101891. Oliveira, S. M., Gruppi, A., Vieira, M. V., Matos, G. S., Vicente, A. A., Teixeira, J. A., ... & Pastrana, L. M. (2021). How additive manufacturing can boost the bioactivity of baked functional foods. Journal of Food Engineering, 294, 110394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110394. Pant, A., Lee, A. Y., Karyappa, R., Lee, C. P., An, J., Hashimoto, M., Tan, U. X., Wong, G., Chua, C. K., & Zhang, Y. (2021). 3D food printing of fresh vegetables using food hydrocolloids for dysphagic patients. Food Hydrocolloids, 114(October 2020), 106546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106546. Paolillo, M., Derossi, A., van Bommel, K., Noort, M., & Severini, C. (2021). Rheological properties, dispensing force and printing fidelity of starchy-gels modulated by concentration, temperature and resting time. Food Hydrocolloids, 117, 106703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106703. Portanguen, S., Tournayre, P., Sicard, J., Astruc, T., & Mirade, P. S. (2019). Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 86, 188- 198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.023. Pulatsu, E., Su, J. W., Kenderes, S. M., Lin, J., Vardhanabhuti, B., & Lin, M. (2021). Effects of ingredients and pre-heating on the printing quality and dimensional stability in 3D printing of cookie dough. Journal of Food Engineering, 294, 110412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110412. Pulatsu, E., Su, J. W., Lin, J., & Lin, M. (2020). Factors affecting 3D printing and post-processing capacity of cookie dough. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 61, 102316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102316. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450122666210120142416 https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.453338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102738 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1641065 https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719370 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1920569 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.005 https://www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Industrial_Summer_Study/2016/2-sustainable-production-design-and-supply-chain-initiatives/how-companies-respond-to-the-emergence-of-3d-printing-technology/ https://doi.org/10.1108/ir-10-2021-0247 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101891 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110394 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106546 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106703 https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110412 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102316 92 Spektrum Industri ISSN 1693-6590 Vol. 21, No. 1, 2023, pp. 85-92 Ahmad Amirudin Assidiq (Parameter Optimization of Printcake Machine Using Full Factorial) Radoš, K., Benković, M., Mustač, N. Č., Habuš, M., Voučko, B., Pavičić, T. V., ... & Novotni, D. (2023). Powder properties, rheology and 3D printing quality of gluten-free blends. Journal of Food Engineering, 338, 111251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111251. Shen, D., Zhang, M., Mujumdar, A. S., & Li, J. (2022). Advances and application of efficient physical fields in extrusion based 3D food printing technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.11.017. Tabriz, A. G., Fullbrook, D. H. G., Vilain, L., Derrar, Y., Nandi, U., Grau, C., ... & Douroumis, D. (2021). Personalised tasted masked chewable 3D printed fruit-chews for paediatric patients. Pharmaceutics, 13(8), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13081301. Tavares Luiz, M. (2021). Santos Rosa Viegas J, Palma Abriata J, Viegas F, Testa Moura de Carvalho Vicentini F, Lopes Badra Bentley MV, et al. Design of experiments (DoE) to develop and to optimize nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 165, 127-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.05.011. Tejada-Ortigoza, V., & Cuan-Urquizo, E. (2022). Towards the development of 3D-printed food: A rheological and mechanical approach. Foods, 11(9), 1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091191. Vo, H. (2022). Design creativity in Industry 4.0: Gravity Sketch and 3D printing in a Luminaire design project. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt- 01-2022-0053. Yang, F., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Liu, Y. (2018). Investigation on lemon juice gel as food material for 3D printing and optimization of printing parameters. Lwt, 87, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.054. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Cai, Y., Ahmad, I., Zhang, A., Ding, Y., ... & Lyu, F. (2022). Hot extrusion 3D printing technologies based on starchy food: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 119763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111251 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.11.017 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13081301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.05.011 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091191 https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0053 https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-01-2022-0053 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.054 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119763