239 Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching Department of English Studies, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz SSLLT 10 (2). 2020. 239-256 http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.2.2 http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait emotional intelligence and why it matters Sharona Moskowitz Birkbeck, University of London, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5456-2186 smosko02@mail.bbk.ac.uk Jean-Marc Dewaele Birkbeck, University of London, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8480-0977 j.dewaele@bbk.ac.uk Abstract The aim of this study is to examine how students perceive teacher trait emotional intelligence (TEI) and how those perceptions relate to students’ own self-reported attitudes and motivation. Adult students of ESL/EFL were given an online question- naire consisting of two parts: one to provide observer-reported data on their teacher’s trait emotional intelligence and the second to measure students’ own attitudes and motivation. In total, 129 participants of 28 nationalities took part. The results showed that the perceived teacher TEI domains of teacher sociability and teacher self-control were significant predictors of student positive feelings and at- titudes towards the teacher. With this paper, we make the case that observer re- ports of teacher TEI by students could be a valuable tool in L2 instruction by offer- ing teachers unique insight into their own classroom behavior, thereby increasing teacher self-awareness which could lead to improved classroom practices. Keywords: trait emotional intelligence; attitudes; motivation; teacher sociabil- ity; teacher self-control Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 240 1. Introduction There is an increasing acceptance and understanding of teaching as an “emo- tion-laden process, yet there is still much that we do not fully understand about how teacher emotions function in classrooms, how they influence the practice of teaching and how they shape teacher professional identities” (Gkonou, Dewaele, & King, 2020, p. 1). What also remains somewhat hazy is how stu- dents’ impressions of their teachers’ emotions relate to their own learning pro- cess in the L2 classroom. Aside from the customary course evaluation forms routinely administered to students at the end of a term, language learners are rarely asked directly what they think about their teachers in a formal manner, and even less so with regard to their teachers’ emotional aspects. With this current study, we attempt to “break the ice” by asking adult foreign language students to quantify their teach- ers’ trait emotional intelligence (TEI) using an adapted version of the TEIQue 360° short form test (Petrides & Furnham, 2006). Given that most student/teacher re- lationships call for at least some degree of social and personal distance, we argue that exploring students’ personal and often unexpressed impressions of their teachers’ emotions could benefit both students and teachers by effectively hold- ing up a mirror to language teachers, offering a distinct perspective in revealing teachers’ own blind spots in their practice and classroom behavior. 2. Literature review 2.1. Emotion and the language classroom The language classroom is an emotionally charged environment for both stu- dents and teachers (Dewaele, Gkonou, & Mercer, 2018; Dewaele & MacIntyre, 2014; Gkonou, Dewaele, & King, 2020). Teachers with high TEI help themselves and their students deal with emotions in the classroom (Dewaele, Gkonou, & Mercer, 2018; Dewaele & Mercer, 2018). Dewaele (2020) found that teachers with high TEI were more intrinsically motivated to be good teachers. They also had stronger identified regulation and were less amotivated. More granular analysis of the four facets of TEI revealed that teachers with higher levels of wellbeing and sociability were most likely to be strongly intrinsically motivated while teachers with low levels of wellbeing and emotionality were most likely to be amotivated. Teachers are often cautious about their emotional reactions in the classroom and selective about which emotions to show, carefully keeping certain emotions glossed over or cordoned off from student view completely. Nonetheless, despite engaging in so-called “emotional labor” to edit out truly Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 241 felt emotions in order to only show the desired ones (Hochschild, 1983), stu- dents are generally aware of and responsive to a teacher’s reactions, including automatic involuntary facial change in response to an emotion. For example, a teacher’s spontaneous nod of approval or disparaging glance is often noticed and taken to heart, regardless of the teacher’s intention (Acheson & Nelson, 2020; Benesch, 2012, 2017; Dimberg, Thunberg, & Elmehed, 2000; Sime, 2006). King (2016) found that teachers in Japan went to great lengths to stifle displays of negative emotion, reasoning that such displays would demotivate students. Curiously in stark contrast, a later qualitative study by Humphries (2020) of a teacher at an engineering college, also in Japan, profiled a teacher who felt so emotionally drained and fed up with his unmotivated students, that he effec- tively granted himself carte blanche to openly express his dissatisfaction and frustration in the classroom. Even though some people are more adept at controlling their emotions (e.g., by natural predisposition, disciplined practice, or some combination thereof), ob- servers are still often able to pick up on very subtle emotional cues. As Barsade and Gibson (2007) assert, teachers may often not be aware that they are showing emo- tion through facial expression or body language. Emotions we do not even realize we are feeling can influence our thoughts and behaviors. Further complicating matters is the ongoing debate over whether or not emotional intelligence (EI) can be changed, and if so, to what extent. On the positive side, there is some evidence that teachers in general can learn to control and regulate their own emotions, thereby increasing the effectiveness of their practice (Sutton, 2004), and this is true for language teachers as well, particularly those with less experience (Gkonou & Mercer, 2017). In fact, teachers often already do consciously self-modify their own emotional displays in the classroom. Sutton, Mudrey-Camino, and Knight (2009) found that in a study of 400 junior high school teachers, 97% believed that their teaching practices would be improved by increasing positive emotions in them- selves, actively using strategies such as self-talk, deep breathing and visualization to control their own facial reactions in the classroom. Student perceptions of how teachers behave have a significant relation to student outcomes (Clark et al., 1979; Spilt, Koomen, & Thijs, 2011) and there is little doubt that students are acutely aware of teachers’ emotions, both nega- tive and positive (Sutton & Wheatley, 2003), including nonverbal behavior. In a qualitative study of adult language learners’ perceptions of teacher nonverbal behaviors, Sime (2006) analyzed five separate EFL classes, interviewing partici- pants after each class, finding that learners characterized teacher gestures into three general categories with three distinct functions: for the learner’s benefit, to serve an organizational function, such as classroom management, and for emo- tional engagement. The researcher also found that learners preferred teachers Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 242 who conveyed enthusiasm through their gestures and that those gestures pro- moted a relaxed atmosphere. Unsurprisingly, the researcher noted that no matter how subtle teachers’ gestures were, learners noticed and interpreted them, pos- iting that “the fact that teachers may often be unaware of the emotional effects that their nonverbal actions may have on individuals does not mean that learners are oblivious to them” (2006, p. 222). In other words, teacher behavior signifi- cantly affects student outcomes and “student perceptions of teacher behavior can have an important influence on causal relationships in the classroom” (Clark et al., 1979, p. 30). Teacher EI may also have a positive effect on student achieve- ment by strengthening the students’ own self-perception of aptitude and ability (Curci, Lanciano, & Soleti, 2014). 2.2. Observer-reported EI Noticing and making judgements about others’ emotions is a constant process, whether we are aware of it or not. As Kahneman (2015) notes, the tendency to make judgements about others’ emotions is so basic and atavistic that people as early as infanthood tend to assign emotional personality traits even to non- human objects. He comments: “The perception of intention and emotion is ir- resistible . . . Your mind is ready and even eager to identify agents, assign them personality traits and specific intentions, and view their actions as expressing individual propensities” (2015, p. 76). Furthermore, these perceptions have sa- lient effects on behavior and personal relationships. As Elfenbein, Barsade and Eisenkraft point out, “. . . social perception of emotional abilities [is] an epiphe- nomenal construct – that is, judgments of EI are theoretically important in their own right because they exist in our minds, not necessarily because they are ac- curate or valid for use as a measurement device. People continually make these judgments, and these judgments subsequently have meaningful interpersonal consequences” (2015, p. 19). While it is true that impressions of others’ emotions can be faulty and bias-prone (Kahneman, 2015), a strong argument can be made that self-impres- sions are even more unreliable, at least in certain respects. Cooper and Petrides (2010) have been critical of self-reported measures of ability EI as have other researchers, noting a strong general proclivity towards overestimating one’s own positive traits and abilities (Chance, Norton, Gino, & Ariely, 2011). In con- trast to the pitfalls of self-reported EI tests, a good deal of solid research sup- ports the validity and accuracy of observer-reported testing across various con- texts (see Furnham, 2008). In one particular study in the field of organizational psychology, co-workers rated personality traits of their colleagues in the work environment and it was found that such observer ratings of personality traits Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 243 were indeed better predictors of overall performance than self-reported ratings (Oh, Wang, & Mount, 2011). Assessing oneself impartially may be difficult due to the all too human flaw of self-delusion, which has led researchers to argue that people are sometimes better judges of the EI of others than of their own (Furnham, Race, & Rosen, 2014). Grant (2018) concurs: “As a social scientist, if I want to get a read on your personality, I could ask you to fill out a survey on how stable, dependable, friendly, outgoing, and curious you are. But I would be much better off asking your coworkers to rate you on those same traits: They’re often more than twice as accurate.” Trait emotional intelligence is defined as “a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions located at the lower levels of personality hierar- chies” (Petrides, Pérez-Gonzalez, & Furnham, 2007, p. 26). TEI deals with how peo- ple perceive their own emotional competences and their own inner landscapes, us- ing four domains as follows: wellbeing; self-control; emotionality; sociability. In a paper on TEI of ballet dancers and musicians (Petrides, Niven, & Mouskounti, 2006), the researchers compared observer versus self-reported rat- ings and investigated the validity of TEIQue tests in relatively small sample sizes (34 ballet students, 5 ballet teachers). First they compared self-ratings to ob- server ratings of ballet students and teachers, and then explored the relation- ship between TEI scores and ballet dancing. The researchers found a high rate of self-other convergence, meaning that: ballet teacher ratings on the TEIQue 360° – SF showed high inter-rater reliabilities, which suggests that not only do lay people understand the nature of the trait EI facets, but they also agree when they rate others on them. Furthermore, teacher trait EI ratings con- verged with student trait EI scores, which supports the accuracy of emotion-related self- perceptions. In other words, it is clear that there is at least some convergence between self- and other-perceptions of emotion-related abilities as well as between self-percep- tions and objective performance on affect-laden tasks. (Petrides et al., 2006, p. 104) The authors provide evidence that “in relation to the operationalization of trait EI . . . the TEIQue provides complete and valid measurement of the construct. In stark contrast to ability EI tests, the TEIQue shows robust psychometric proper- ties, even in small sample research” (Petrides et al., 2006, p. 106). We argue in the present paper that the same principles that undergird the value of observer EI reports in the workplace and other contexts could be trans- ferable to the language classroom. Language learners have a unique vantage point, both physically due to the layout of many traditional classrooms, and psy- chologically, because of the inherent power structure of the relationship be- tween students and teachers. As a result, learners have a special awareness of teachers that teachers themselves may not even have. Moreover, while research Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 244 on observer reported EI has been flourishing in the corporate world, there is a remarkable gap of such research in educational settings, particularly in the for- eign language (L2) classroom, which is ironic considering that teacher and stu- dent emotions are elaborately interconnected and thus will necessarily influ- ence each other (Hargreaves, 2000; Mercer & Kostoulas, 2018; Moskowitz & Dewaele, 2019; Sutton & Wheatley, 2003). In terms of traditional self-reported tests of performance and intelligence, a significant male bias towards self-enhancement and a significant female bias to- wards self-diminishment has emerged (e.g., Beyer, 1998; Furnham & Rawles, 1995). Schutte et al. (1998) revealed a significant gender difference in self-reported measures of TEI, but Petrides and Furnham (2000) found that there were generally no significant differences between males and females in total measured TEI, with the exception of the domain of “social skills,” with females self-reporting higher scores than males. In a study of the effect of perceptions of teacher characteristics on enjoyment and anxiety of Spanish students of English, the researchers found that teacher gender was unrelated to student level of foreign language enjoyment (FLE) and foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA) (Dewaele, Franco Magdalena, & Saito, 2019); however, the effect of student gender was not tested. Previous re- search did show a small gender effect on learners’ classroom emotions, with female L2 learners reporting both more anxiety and enjoyment (Dewaele, MacIntyre, Bou- dreau, & Dewaele, 2016). The “emotional sensitivity hypothesis” posits that women are more likely than men to notice subtle or ambiguous emotional displays of oth- ers. However, a study of 5,000 participants (Fischer, Kret, & Broekens, 2018) found contradictory evidence and little solid support for this hypothesis. Testing both self- reported EI and perceived emotion of others, the authors found that: men did score lower on self-perceived EI, which suggests that they think of themselves as less confident in perceiving, understanding and regulating emotions than did women. However, this did not affect the intensity ratings of target emotions. In other words, men and women’s self-perceived emotional intelligence is not a reliable predictor of rating the intensity of the intended emotion displays on the face. (Fischer et al., 2018, p. 14) Although research on emotion in SLA and particularly positive emotion is steadily gaining momentum (Dewaele, Chen, Padilla, & Lake 2019; Dewaele & Li, 2020), given the emotional and social nature of the classroom and of the stu- dent-teacher relationship, such empirical investigations remain paltry (Dewaele & Dewaele, 2017; Dörnyei & Ryan, 2015; Mercer & Kostoulas, 2018). Furthermore, despite some recent notable exceptions (e.g., Dewaele et al., 2019), the topic of student emotion perception of teachers is practically uncharted territory in SLA research. There is some evidence that how students render the classroom in emotional terms matters in measurable, observable outcomes. In a study of Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 245 2,000 language arts students at the 5th and 6th grade levels from a diverse ur- ban school district in the United States, researchers found a positive correlation between student reported emotional climate of the classroom and observer- reported student conduct (Brackett, Reyes, Rivers, Elbertson, & Salovey, 2011). The researchers posited that “in emotionally supportive classrooms, students liked and respected their teachers more and in turn, behaved better. These find- ings align with a growing body of research evidencing the influence of emotional aspects of the classroom in student motivation, engagement, performance, and conduct in school” (Brackett et al., 2011, p. 32). Interest in teacher psychology is growing fast, and in particular, an “area with little research at present but with considerable implications for classroom life and teacher well-being concerns teacher emotions, their emotional intelligence and ability to self-regulate . . . this suggests there remains a whole rich under ex- plored area for future research” (Mercer, Oberdorfer, & Saleem, 2016, p. 220). In the context of the foreign language classroom, we propose that the TEI of teach- ers as reported by student observers could unearth valuable insights with not only theoretical implications but potential uses applicable in the classroom as well. We realize that teachers might have their misgivings; after all, students may not al- ways regard their teachers in a favorable light. However, such feedback from stu- dents could add meaningful contributions to the study of teacher psychology by helping teachers learn about their own strengths and weaknesses. 3. The study 3.1. Research questions The study reported in this part of the paper was conducted with the purpose of addressing the following two research questions: 1. What is the relationship between student perceptions of teacher TEI and students’ own self-reported positive feelings? If a significant relationship does exist, which domain of trait EI correlates most strongly with a fa- vorable impression of a teacher? 2. How does perceived teacher EI affect student attitude towards the teacher? We hypothesize that student perceptions of teacher TEI will predict at least some as- pects of student attitude and motivation in the classroom. Since past research has shown that FLE is highly correlated with teacher friendliness, we predict that the do- main of perceived teacher sociability will be a predictor of student positive feelings. Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 246 3.2. Methodology 3.2.1. Participants This study draws on data collected from a larger research project. Participants from all over the world were asked to fill out an anonymous online question- naire. The respondents were all adults enrolled in an English as a foreign or sec- ond language classes at the time of the study (total N = 129, male n = 40, female n = 87, unspecified gender n = 2). Ages ranged from 18 to 60 years old (M = 23 years, SD = 6). Participants reported 28 different nationalities, with 6 partici- pants providing dual nationalities. The largest nationality group represented was Austrian (n = 40), followed by French (n = 16), Japanese (n = 14), UAE (n= 9), Syrian (n = 7), and Belgian (n = 7). The highest first language group was Ger- man (n = 43), followed by Arabic (n = 26), French (n = 23), and Japanese (n = 13). Participants were asked how many languages they knew in addition to their mother tongue and English, “proficient enough for at least a basic conversation.” All respondents were automatically considered to be bilingual since they were re- quired to represent at least lower-intermediate level English proficiency to partic- ipate in the study. Therefore, additional languages known are in addition to their L1 and English: 32 respondents knew no additional languages, 57 knew one addi- tional language, and 41 knew two or more additional languages. When asked to describe their own English performance in comparison to their peers on a 5-point Likert scale, the mean was 3.70 and the standard devi- ation amounted to .82, which indicates that most participants considered them- selves slightly more proficient than their peers. In describing their own level of English (also on a 5-point Likert scale), the mean was 4.11, with a standard de- viation of .80, indicating that most participants indeed rated their own levels of English as rather advanced. 3.2.2. Instrument The first section of the questionnaire included a basic collection of demographic and personal items concerning the number of years spent learning English, the amount of time spent using English outside the classroom and self-reported rating of English ability, both independently and compared to their classmates. The de- pendent variable of student attitude and motivation was measured using a con- struct adapted from the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB, Gardner, 1985). The section included 22 total items, with responses measured on a 5-point Likert scale (M = 3.83, SD = .58, α = .869). Negatively worded items were reverse coded. The subsections were modified from the original AMTB to better suit the relationship Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 247 between teachers and adult learners. Items that dealt with homework and parental guidance were omitted. Questions dealing with anxiety were also omitted. The two subcategories were as follows: (1) positive feelings (M = 3.91, SD = .65, α = .794) and (2) attitude towards English teacher (M = 3.76, SD = .63, α =.790). The independent variable of perceived teacher emotional intelligence was measured using a 22 item construct adapted from the TEIQue 360° short form (Petrides & Furnham, 2006), meant to assess TEI from the perspective of an ob- server. Responses were measured on a 7-point Likert scale (M = 5.21, SD =. 95, α = .914). The subsections were consistent with the domains of the original test: (1) teacher wellbeing (M = 5.51, SD = 1.18, α = .669), (2) teacher self-control (M = 5.20, SD = 1.23, α = .758), (3) teacher emotionality (M = 5.06, SD = 1.14, α = .796), and (4) teacher sociability (M = 5.18, SD = .83, α = .641) Q-Q plots of the dependent variables showed nearly normal distributions (Figures 1-2), so the more powerful parametric statistics were chosen. Figure 1 Normal QQ plot of positive feelings Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 248 Figure 2 Normal QQ plot of attitude towards teacher To answer the research questions, first Pearson’s correlation analyses were conducted (see Table 1), and the significant independent variables were tested for unique variance using a multiple stepwise regression. All Durbin-Wat- son values fall between the accepted range of 1 and 3, and the tolerance values are all above .20, which suggests that there is no multicollinearity. Table 1 Pearson’s correlation analyses for dependent variables Pearson’s correlation Positive feelings Attitude towards teacher T sociability .397* .654* T wellbeing .289* .538* T emotionality .314* .536* T self-control .314* .625* Notes. * p < 0.05 3.3. Findings 3.3.1. Positive feelings Pearson’s correlation analyses showed that student positive feelings correlate with all four domains of perceived teacher TEI, with teacher sociability showing the strongest correlation (r = .397). A multiple regression analysis was used to Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 249 determine the unique effect of predictor variables while controlling for the ef- fect of others (see Table 2). It revealed a significant regression equation for teacher sociability (F(1, 127) = 23.787, p < .000) with the R² value equaling .158, which indicates that teacher sociability predicts 15.8% of the variance of stu- dents’ positive feelings, a medium effect size (cf. Plonsky & Ghanbar, 2018). Table 2 Multiple regression for student positive feelings Predictor R² F p β Durbin-Watson Collinearity diagnostics tolerance T sociability .158 23.79 .000 .397 1.41 1.000 Notes. Dependent variable: Student positive feelings Predictor: Perceived teacher sociability 3.3.2. Attitude towards the teacher Pearson’s correlational analysis showed that all four domains of teacher TEI corre- late with attitude towards teacher, with teacher sociability showing the highest cor- relation (r = .320). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the Durbin- Watson value (1.97) and the VIF value (1.00) indicated no concern for autocorrela- tion nor multicollinearity, the normality and residual plots indicated linearity and homoscedasticity. A significant regression equation was found, with two variables – teacher sociability and teacher self-control – predicting 46% of the variance: Ad- justed R² square = .455, (F(1, 127) = 94.92, p < .0001), which is a large effect size (cf. Plonsky & Ghanbar, 2018). The strongest predictor was teacher sociability (β = .424, p < .0001), explaining 42.8% of variance, followed by teacher self-control (β = .298, p < .0001), explaining an additional 3.6% of variance. 4. Discussion The first research question asked about the relationship between student self- reported positive feelings and perceptions of teacher TEI. The results show that all four domains of perceived teacher TEI correlate with positive feelings, under- scoring the importance of the teacher-student relationship and student percep- tions of teacher emotional aspects. The TEI domain of teacher sociability corre- lated most strongly with student positive feelings and also predicted unique var- iance in positive feelings, indicating that friendlier, more sociable teachers make students feel more positive in the classroom. This finding is consistent with a study by Dewaele et al. (2018), which found that teacher characteristics pre- dicted 20% of the variance in foreign language enjoyment, with teacher friend- liness being the strongest positive predictor. Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 250 In terms of student attitude towards the teacher, all four the domains of perceived teacher TEI showed a positive correlation. The domains of teacher sociability and teacher self-control predicted a large amount of variance, provid- ing strong evidence that students prefer language teachers they perceive as so- ciable and friendly, and that students have better attitudes towards teachers who they think effectively control their own emotions in the classroom. Based on this, it can be presumed that teachers who are better able to control their own emotions will more effectively put students at ease and create a more pos- itive environment with less anxiety (see Dewaele & MacIntyre, 2014). Further- more, the student preference for teachers who they perceive can effectively control their own emotions accords with earlier research showing that “socially and emotionally competent teachers set the tone of the classroom by develop- ing supporting and encouraging relationships with their students . . . and acting as a role model for respectful and appropriate communications and exhibitions of prosocial behavior” (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009, p. 492). Both consciously and unconsciously, teachers craft a classroom persona, carefully selecting which of their personal traits to reveal, exaggerate, or, con- versely, play down or conceal completely (King, 2016). In doing so, teachers can become almost like caricatures of themselves and often report feeling typically associated with performers rather than educators (Beadle, 2009; Lamb, 2017). Regardless of the “authenticity” of teacher emotional displays, students are con- stantly observing and judging their teachers’ TEI from their own vantage point and, as our results indicate, those assessments have predictive effects on stu- dents’ positive feelings and attitudes towards the teacher. These results com- bined with established research on the validity and uses of observer reported EI testing in various settings suggest that it might be worthwhile to survey adult students about how they perceive their teacher’s TEI since those perceptions are related to their own attitudes and motivation. Furthermore, due to their point of view as observers, students have a unique awareness of their teacher’s TEI and might hold a key to a deeper understanding of teacher psychology. This study has potential pedagogical implications. Student reported as- sessment of teacher TEI can be extremely valuable in improving teachers’ self- awareness and might help illuminate teachers’ own blind spots. Because of their unique vantage point, adult students have special insight into their teacher’s TEI. In other words, students may know their teachers in ways that their teachers simply do not know themselves (at least in the less private aspects of emotion). Because the student-teacher relationship is reciprocal by nature, such assess- ments might benefit students as well. In proposing that students assess their teachers’ TEI, we realize that teachers might have their misgivings; after all, stu- dents may not always regard their teachers in a favorable light. However, such Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 251 feedback from students could add meaningful contributions to the study of teacher psychology and also help teachers at the individual level to learn about their own strengths and weaknesses. Although some teachers might feel re- sistant to hearing their students’ observations, we suspect that many might also be unexpectedly enlightened and encouraged by what their students report. One result that seems to emerge repeatedly is that students prefer more sociable teachers and that teachers perceived as more emotionally intelligent tend to fare better in the classroom. While some teachers may be more naturally predisposed to sociability and self-control, Gregersen, MacIntyre and MacMillan (2020) propose a cognitive reappraisal strategy called “finding silver linings” in order for teachers to deal with stressful situations, particularly those that may arise while studying abroad. Similarly, Falout and Murphey (2018) make the case for teachers to actively construct meaning and purpose in teaching, even if they do not feel that they were “meant to be” teachers. In order for teachers to func- tion optimally, they need support and encouragement, which must include recognition and respect for the job’s emotional challenges. One limitation of the present study is the unavoidable self-selection bias; students who were willing to take the survey probably had more positive atti- tudes about their teachers and the learning process to begin with. Another lim- itation involves the absence of data about the teachers themselves and the par- ticulars of the teaching contexts, including the students’ motivation for taking the class and how long they had known the teacher. Since emotions are highly context dependent and even teacher-specific (Dewaele & Dewaele, 2017), fur- ther research is needed to delve more deeply into this topic. It might be worth- while in the future to collect teachers’ self-reported TEI and compare the results against the observer-reported scores by their students to look for similarities and disparities. As the present study was cross-sectional, it was also impossible to look at students’ perceptual changes of teacher TEI over time in relation to student attitudes, which could be done with a longitudinal design. 5. Conclusion This study illustrates the relationship between perceived teacher TEI, and student attitudes and motivation. The results show that the domains of perceived teacher sociability, teacher emotionality, and teacher self-control can predict student pos- itive feelings, student attitudes towards teachers, and student foreign language anxiety levels. We propose that there could be inherent value in student observer reports of teacher TEI and asking students to report those perceptions in an ethi- cal, nonthreatening manner could help teachers improve their own self-aware- ness and teaching practice. We do not contend that student opinions of teachers Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 252 should be taken at face value. However, given the proven utility of observer-re- ported EI testing, we argue that such inquiry in the setting of the foreign language classroom could be beneficial. There is ample room for discovery in the multifac- eted and richly complex area of the psychology of language learning and teaching, and we feel that this study is a starting point for further research. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the participants for having taken the time to fill out our questionnaire, and the reviewers and the editor for their excellent feedback. Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 253 References Acheson, K., & Nelson, R. B. (2020). Utilizing the emotional labour scale to ana- lyse the form and extent of emotional labour among foreign language teachers in the US public school system. In C. Gkonou, J.-M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 31-52). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59. Beadle, P. (2009). A good teacher is an entertainer as well as an educator. The Guardian from https://www.theguardian.com Benesch, S. (2012). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories and praxis. New York, NY: Routledge. Benesch, S. (2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. New York, NY: Routledge. Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in self-perception and negative recall bias. Sex Roles, 38, 103-133. Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Rivers, S. E., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2011). Classroom emotional climate, teacher affiliation, and student conduct. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(1), 27-36. Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (Suppl. 3), 15655-15659. Clark, C. M., Gage, N. L., Marx, R. W., Peterson, P. L., Stayrook, N. G., & Winne, P. H. (1979). A factorial experiment on teacher structuring, soliciting, and reacting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 534-552. Cooper, A., & Petrides, K. V. (2010). A psychometric analysis of the trait emo- tional intelligence questionnaire-short form (TEIQue-SF) using item re- sponse theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 449-457. Curci, A., Lanciano, T., & Soleti, E. (2014). Emotions in the classroom: The role of teachers’ emotional intelligence ability in predicting students’ achieve- ment. The American Journal of Psychology, 127(4), 431-445. Dewaele, J.-M. (2020). What psychological, linguistic and sociobiographical varia- bles power EFL/ESL teachers’ motivation? In C. Gkonou, C., J.-M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 269- 287). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Dewaele, J.-M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., & Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2128. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128 Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 254 Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2017). The dynamic interactions in foreign lan- guage classroom anxiety and foreign language enjoyment of pupils aged 12 to 18: A pseudo-longitudinal investigation. Journal of the European Sec- ond Language Association, 1, 11-22. Dewaele, J.-M., Franco Magdalena, A., & Saito, K. (2019). The effect of percep- tion of teacher characteristics on Spanish EFL learners’ anxiety and enjoy- ment. Modern Language Journal, 103, 412-427. Dewaele, J.-M., Gkonou, C., & Mercer, S. (2018). Do ESL/EFL teachers´ emotional intelligence, teaching experience, proficiency and gender, affect their classroom practice? In J. de Dios Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching: Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 125-141). Berlin: Springer. Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A crit- ical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World [Chinese 外语 界], 196(1), 34-49. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237-274. Dewaele, J.-M., MacIntyre, P. D., Boudreau, C., & Dewaele, L. (2016). Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language class- room. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2(1), 41-63. Dewaele, J.-M., & Mercer, S. (2018). Do ESL/EFL teachers´ emotional intelligence, teaching experience, proficiency and gender, affect their classroom prac- tice? In S. Mercer & A. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language teacher psychology (pp. 178-195). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86-89. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge. Elfenbein, H. A., Barsade, S. G., & Eisenkraft, N. (2015). The social perception of emotional abilities: Expanding what we know about observer ratings of emotional intelligence. Emotion, 15(1), 17-34. Falout, J., & Murphey, T. (2018). Teachers crafting job crafting. In S. Mercer & A. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language teacher psychology (pp. 211–230). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Fischer, A. H., Kret, M. E., & Broekens, J. (2018). Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis. PloS one, 13(1), e0190712. http://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0190712 Furnham, A. (2008). Personality and intelligence at work. London: Routledge Through the looking glass of student perception: How foreign language students see teacher trait. . . 255 Furnham, A., Race, M.-C., & Rosen, A. (2014). Emotional intelligence and the occu- pational personality questionnaire (OPQ). Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-8. Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelli- gence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 741-745. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language Learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Gkonou, C., Dewaele, J.-M., & King, J. (2020). Introduction to the emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. In C. Gkonou, J.-M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 1-12). Bris- tol: Multilingual Matters. Gkonou, C., & Mercer, S. (2017). Understanding emotional and social intelli- gence among English language teachers. London: British Council. Grant, A. (2018). People don’t actually know themselves very well. https://www. theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/03/you-dont-know-yourself-as-wel l-as-you-think-you-do/554612/ Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & MacMillan, N. (2020). Dealing with the emo- tions of teaching abroad: Searching for silver linings in a difficult context. In C. Gkonou, J.-M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 228-246). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interac- tions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826. Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feel- ing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Humphries, S. (2020). “Please teach me how to teach”: The emotional impact of educational change. In C. Gkonou, J.-M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 150-172). Bristol: Mul- tilingual Matters. Jennings, P., & Greenberg, M. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom out- comes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. Kahneman, D. (2015). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. King, J. (2016). “It’s time, put on the smile, it’s time!”: The emotional labor of second language teaching within a Japanese university. In C. Gkonou, D. Tatzl, & S. Mercer (Eds.), New directions in language learning psychology (pp. 97-112). New York: Springer. Lamb, M. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50(3), 301-346. Mercer, S., & Kostoulas, A. (Eds.). (2018). Language teacher psychology. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Sharona Moskowitz, Jean-Marc Dewaele 256 Mercer, S., Oberdorfer, P., & Saleem, M. (2016). Helping language teachers to thrive: Using positive psychology to promote teachers’ professional well-being. In D. Gabryś-Barker & D. Gałajda (Eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on for- eign language learning and teaching (pp. 213-229). Cham: Springer. Moskowitz, S., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2019). Is teacher happiness contagious? A study of the link between perceptions of language teacher happiness and stu- dent self-reported attitudes and motivation. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1707205 Oh, I.-S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762-773. Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2000). Gender differences in measured and self- estimated trait emotional intelligence. Sex Roles, 42, 449-461. Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender-specific model of organizational variables. Journal of Applied So- cial Psychology, 36, 552-569. Petrides, K. V., & Niven, L., & Mouskounti, T. (2006). The trait emotional intelli- gence of ballet dancers and musicians. Psicothema, 18, 101-107. Petrides, K. V., Pérez-Gonzalez, J. C., & Furnham, A. (2007). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cognition and Emo- tion, 21(1), 26-55. Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A method- ological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. Modern Language Journal, 102, 713-731. Schutte, N., Malouff, J., Hall, E., Haggerty, D., Cooper, J., Golden, D., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelli- gence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167-177. Sime, D. (2006). What do learners make of teachers’ gestures in the language classroom? IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(2), 211-230. Spilt, J., Koomen, H., & Thijs, J. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher- student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457-477. Sutton, R. E. (2004). Emotion regulation goals and strategies of teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 379-398. Sutton, R. E., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Knight, C. (2009). Teachers’ emotion regu- lation and classroom management. Theory Into Practice, 48(2), 130-137. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A re- view of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psy- chology Review, 15(4), 327-358.