Microsoft Word - Warland_v3_definitive.doc Studies  on  National  Movements,  1  (2013)      |      REVIEWS   Geneviève  Warland  240   Anne-­Marie  Thiesse  (ed.),  La  culture  des  nations.  Special  issue   of   La   matière   et   l’esprit,   no.   16   (Mons:   Université   de   Mons,   2010)  72  pp.,  ill.,  ISBN  9782872828012.   Review  by  Geneviève  Warland   The  interdisciplinary  review  La  matière  et  l’esprit,  edited  by  the  University   of  Mons,  asks  a  number  of  different  specialists  to  provide  the  intellectual   contribution   for   each   edition.   In   this   edition,   Anne-­‐Marie   Thiesse,   directeur  de  recherches  at  the  CNRS,  well  known  for  her  work  La  création   des   identités   nationales.   Europe,   XVIIIe-­XXe   siècle   (Paris,   Le   Seuil,   Points   Histoire,  2001),   invited  other  specialists  to  give  a  short  insight  from  the   perspective  of  their  main  research  topic  (around  eight  pages).  It  resulted   in  a  very  persuasive  collection  of  texts  showing  how  nationalism  was  and   still   is  constructed  in  different  European  countries.  The  sample  includes   France,  Germany,  Greece,  Italy,  the  Republic  of  Macedonia  and  Moldavia.   The  main  concern  relates  to  nationalism  as  a  voluntary  construction  by  a   cultural  or  political  group  coming  to  a  great  part  from  the  transfer  of  ideas,   ideologies   and   symbolic   figures,   borrowed   from   other   countries.   In   her   introduction,  Thiesse  stresses   the   fact   that  all  academics  share  now  the   constructivist   view   on   nationalism,   recognising   the   fact   that   all   nation   states  are  based,  since  the  eighteenth  century,  on  political  grounds  as  well   as  on  cultural  elements.  Moreover,  she   insists  on   the   impact  of  cultural   transfers  on  national  cultures  in  Europe  over  the  last  two  centuries.  Michel   Espagne,   with   Michael   Werner   one   of   the   ‘fathers’   of   the   concept   of   cultural  transfer,  illustrates  the  transformations  of  cultural  goods  from  one   culture  to  another  implied  by  the  transfers  in  order  to  adjust  social  needs   (for   instance,   the   reception   of   Kantian   moral   philosophy   as   a   basis   for   French  republican  pedagogy  and  instruction).  He  also  insists  on  the  fact   that  the  same  structure  is  at  odds  in  European  and  in  colonial  contexts:  the   transfers   operate   often   with   reciprocal   influences   (the   French   and   Vietnamese  literatures  serve  as  an  example).     Studies  on  National  Movements,  1  (2013)      |      REVIEWS   Geneviève  Warland   241   National  culture  has  to  do  with  political  identity.  The  cases  of  Macedonia,   Moldavia   and   also   Padania   in   the   North   of   Italy   best   illustrate   their   intertwinements   and   their   social   and   political   implications.   As   far   as   Padania   (the   region   of   the   Po   valley)   is   concerned   (article   by   Martina   Avanza),  the  promoters  of  this  regional  identity  are  well  aware  that  they   tend  to  construct  a  new  identity  by  manipulating  old  traditions.  They  also   know  that  adopting  purely  economic  justifications  to  sustain  the  political   demands  of  their  party,  the  Lega  Nord,  would  be  insufficient.  Therefore,   the  cultural  reference  to  a  forgotten  nation,  which  has  to  resurge,  is  part  of   the  political  agenda.   Established  in  1991  as  an  independent  Republic,  Macedonia  struggles  with   both   Greece   and   Bulgaria   on   cultural   matters   (article   by   Tchavdar   Marinov).   First,   its   name   is   contested   by   Greece,   which   considers   it   to   belong  to  the  region  of  Thessaloniki.  Second,  Bulgaria  sees  Macedonia  as   one  of  its  provinces,  which  was  the  heart  of  Bulgarian  nationalism.  Third,   Bulgaria  suggests  that  the  building  of  a  national  identity  in  Macedonia  is   related  to  Serbian  nationalists’  manipulation,  arguing  that  Macedonia  is  at   the  centre  of  the  Serbian  medieval  territory.  In  this  context,  the  reference   to  culture   is  a  highly  controversial  one:  on   the  one  side,  Greeks  do  not   want  Macedonians  seeing  themselves  as  heirs  of  Philippe  II  and  Alexander   the  Great;  on  the  other  side,  controversies  still  exist  between  Bulgarians   and   Macedonians   on   the   national   belonging   of   a   group   of   nineteenth-­‐ century   intellectuals,   having   been   either   nationalist   Bulgarians   or   Macedonians  striving  for  independence.     Moldavia’s   case   is  no   less  difficult   (article  by  Petru  Negură):  under   the   Soviet   regime,   the   region,   inhabited   by   several   populations   divided   in   upper  and  lower  classes,  had  to  adjust  to  communist  ideals.  It  resulted  in   the  creation  of  the  Moldavian  language,  based  on  a   local  dialect  derived   from  the  Romanian.  Depending  on  the  political  strategies  with  regard  to   neighbouring  Romania,  numerous  language  reforms  followed,  like  the  use   of  either  the  Cyrillic,  either  the  Latin  alphabet.  Nowadays,  the  country  is   still  divided  between  the  Romanian  identity  and  the  Moldavian  one.  It  has   a  political  impact,  the  political  right  putting  forward  the  first  one  while  the   political  left  favours  the  second  one.   Studies  on  National  Movements,  1  (2013)      |      REVIEWS   Geneviève  Warland  242   The   different   cases   briefly   sketched   here   show   that   many   cultural   references  are  shared,  translated  and  opposed  when  it  comes  to  identity   building.   They   also   illustrate   that   nationalism   is   still   alive   even   if   the   European  Union  seeks  to  propose  an  alternative  political  model.  All   the   historical   contributions   in   this   edition   indicate   that   we   cannot   escape   history  if  we  wish  to  better  understand  the  present.  A  lively  and  helpful   little  book!