Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Volume 12, Issue no. 2, DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Production and Hosting by Knowledge E Research Article Effect of Body Composition on Ventilation Parameters in a Group of Young Sudanese Females N. A. Alaagib1 and M. Y. Sukkar2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum 2Professor of Physiology and dean of Nile College, Khartoum, Sudan Abstract Background: Lung Function Test helps (LFT) in the diagnosis and follow up of patients with pulmonary or cardiac diseases. Ignoring BMI and body composition during interpretation of LFT results may lead to wrong diagnosis and unnecessary use of drugs. Objective: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that differences in body composition between individuals can explain some of the features of LFT that are explained by variations in age, sex, and height only. Methods: This observational analytical cross sectional study which included 150 young adult females. Those with history of amenorrhea, smoking, asthma or cardiac disease were excluded. Anthropometric measurements including: BMI, waist circumference (WC) and body fat percent calculated from skinfold thickness measurements were done. Dynamic spirometric tests were performed using digital spirometer; FEV1, FVC, FEV1% were measured. Results: Both obese and underweight subjects had a significant reduction in FEV1 (P = .002) and FVC (P = .004) compared to normal ones. FEV1% was significantly higher in the overweight and obese group compared to the other two groups (P = .02). Body weight, BMI, and WC had significant positive correlation with FEV1 and FEV1% in young healthy females. Conclusion: Increase in BMI, body weight, WC and body fat showed positive significant correlation with FEV1% and may give a restrictive pattern in LFT. Underweight subjects may show significant reduction in lung function if their BMI is not considered. Keywords: FEV1, FVC, FEV1%, BMI, waist circumference, Body fat %, obesity How to cite this article: N. A. Alaagib and M. Y. Sukkar, (2017) “Effect of Body Composition on Ventilation Parameters in a Group of Young Sudanese Females,” Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 12 (2017), issue no. 2, 78–88. DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 78 Corresponding Author: N. A. Alaagib and M. Y. Sukkar; email: nouralsalhin@gamil.com Received: 15 June 2017 Accepted: 1 July 2017 Published: 4 July 2017 Production and Hosting by Knowledge E N. A. Alaagib and M. Y. Sukkar. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Mohammad A. M. Ibnouf http://www.knowledgee.com mailto:nouralsalhin@gamil.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E من يعانون الذين المرضى ومتابعة تشخيص يف يساعد الرئة وظيفة اختبار الخلفية: أمراض رئوية أو قلبية. تجاهل مؤشر حجم كتلة الجسم وتكوين الجسم أثناء تفسير نتائج اختبار وظيفة الرئة قد يؤدي إىل التشخيص الخاطئ واالستخدام غير الضروري لألدوية. الهدف: أجريت هذه الدراسة الختبار الفرضية القائلة بأن االختالفات يف تكوين الجسم بين األفراد يمكن أن تفسر مالمح اختبار وظيفة الرئة التي يتم تفسيرها من خالل االختالفات يف العمر والجنس واالرتفاع فقط. الشابات اإلناث من ١٥٠ شملت والتي مقطعية تحليلية رصدية دراسة هذه : الطريقة: أمراض أو والربو والتدخين الطمث انقطاع تاريخ من يعانين من واستبعدت البالغات. ونسبة الخصر محيط الجسم، كتلة مؤشر ذلك: يف بما األنثروبومترية القياسات القلب. الدهون يف الجسم محسوبة من قياسات سماكة الجلد. تم إجراء اختبارات قياس التنفس .٪FVC، FEV١ ،FEVالديناميكي باستخدام مقياس التنفس الرقمي؛ تم قياس ١ = P) FEVالنتائج: كان لكل من السمنة ونقص الوزن ىف المدروسات انخفاض كبير يف ١ .٠٠٢) و FVC (P = .٠٠٤) مقارنة مع تلك العادية. وكان FEV١٪ أعلى بكثير يف مجموعة زيادة الوزن والبدانة مقارنة مع المجموعتين األخريتين (P= ٠٫٠٢). وزن الجسم، مؤشر كتلة اإلناث يف ٪FEV١ و FEV١ مع كبيرة إيجابية عالقة على كان الخصر ومحيط الجسم، الصحيحات. الخالصة: إن الزيادة يف مؤشر كتلة الجسم، وزن الجسم، محيط الخصر ونسبة الدهون يف يف انحصاريا نمطا تعطي أن ويمكن ٪FEV١ مع كبيرة إيجابية عالقة على كانت الجسم اختبار وظيفة الرئة. االناث مع نقص الوزن قد تظهر انخفاضا كبيرا يف وظائف الرئة إذا لم يتم النظر يف مؤشر كتلة الجسم. 1. Introduction Assessment of the lung functions (LF) helps in the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary or cardiac diseases. Lung volume measurements made during forced expiration are interpreted by comparing them with the expected values given the age, height and sex of the patient. Body mass index (BMI) is rarely used. This may lead to wrong diagnosis, unnecessary use of drugs, and failure to detect significant improvement in FEV1(forced expiratory volume in the first second) [1]. Racial or ethnic differences in lung volumes have been reported. USA Blacks were found to have lower lung volumes than Whites. The differences in the body size and shape were suggested to be the reason for these differences in spirometric findings [2]. Obesity is known to affect the LF and may increase the effect of an existing airway disease [3]. Obese subjects may have a decrease in lung volume and expiratory flow rates [4] and may experience dyspnea at rest [5, 6]. Some studies found that BMI has a strong positive association with risk of adult-onset asthma [5–8]. Other studies showed that obese individuals can have dyspnea but not airway obstruction [6, 9]. Many obese DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 79 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E subjects were using bronchodilators without evidence of airflow obstruction [6]. Jones and Nzekwu found that BMI has significant effects on all lung volumes [10]. It has been observed that BMI improved the predictions for both volumes and flows, regardless of sex. BMI or body weight (BW) gain has been related to the decrease in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) in adults [11–13]. The addition of waist circumference (WC) to BMI improved the prediction of health risk than BMI alone [14]. Chen et al. reported that WC, but not BMI, is negatively associated with LF [15]. Some studies suggest that upper body fat distribution [16, 17] and abdominal adiposity [18] are better predictors of LF than BW or BMI. Body fat distribution also affects the LF [17]. Fat% and fat free mass (FFM) index improved the descriptions of FVC and of changes in FEV1 and FVC [14]. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that differences in body composi- tion between individuals can explain some of the features of LFT that are explained by variations in age, sex, and height only. 2. Materials and Methods This study is an observational analytical cross sectional study, done on 150 young female university students. The main objective of the study was to determine the effect of overweight and obesity on the ventilatory parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1%). The secondary objectives were: to determine the effect of BMI on each of the ventila- tory parameters, and to verify the relation between BMI, percentage of body fat and waist circumference and each of the ventilatory parameters. Subjects were volunteers from the practical groups who considered themselves healthy with no history of amenorrhea, smoking, asthma or cardiac disease. Their age was between 17-23 years. All subjects had completed a questionnaire personal data and additional questions on smoking, history of asthma, other respiratory or cardio- vascular disease, or any other disease that can affect the lung function. Each subject underwent complete physical examination to exclude any abnormality and signed an informed consent. Dynamic spirometric tests and anthropometric measurements including: BW, height, BMI, WC, skinfold thickness were done. Weight (kg): was measured to the nearest 100 g using standardized digital weight scale (Beurer, Germany) with the subject in standing position wearing light clothes and without shoes. Standing height (m) was measured without shoes with the subject’s back to aver- tical standardized height scale (Seca, Germany) to the nearest mm. Then BMI (kg/m2) was calculated as a ratio between body weight (kg) and squared height (m2). DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 80 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E Waist circumference (cm) was measured using a tape to the nearest 0.1 cm at the end of a normal expiration from exposed relaxed abdomen, at the level of the umbilicus in standing position. Body composition was estimated using three steps: (a) Skinfold thickness was measured in mm using Holtain skinfold caliper (Crymych Company, United Kingdom) from the triceps and subscapular region to the nearest 1 mm [19] by the same investigator. (b) Body fat % (BF%): using the method of Paríková and Bůžková [20], BF% was calculated from the triceps and subscapular skinfold separately as follows: y1 = 4.019 + 0.894 x1 y1 = 2.333 + 0.988 x2 Where y1 = BF% of the body weight; x1 triceps skinfold (mm); x2 subscapular skinfold (mm). (c) Fat Free Mass (FFM) (kg) was calculated from the body weight and BF%. Dynamic spirometric tests were performed using Electronic spirometer (Chest Corporation, Japan) in the sitting position and with a nose clips. First subjects were instructed in the FVC maneuver then the appropriate technique was demonstrated by the investigator. Each subject inhale from FRC and then insert the breathing tube into her mouth, making sure her lips are sealed around the mouthpiece before starting the FVC maneuver. The subject must have a complete inhalation before beginning the forced exhalation. Each subject attempted to perform at least three acceptable FVC maneuvers according to the ATS (American Thoracic Society) acceptability and reproducibility criteria [21]. The highest result was used for statistical analysis. FEV1, FVC, and FEV1% were measured. Data analysis: Data was saved and analyzed using SPSS version 10. Subjects were classified into 3 BMI groups: underweight, normal and obese (include both overweight and obese BMI > 25 kg/m2) according to WHO classification [22]. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the variables according to BMI classes. Correlations of body measurements with ventilatory parameters were done using Pearson Correlation. To verify the effect of BMI class on the ventilatory parameters their mean values was compared between underweight, normal, obese groups using analysis of multiple vari- ances (ANOVA) Test. 3. Results This study included 150 young healthy females. Subjects were classified according to BMI class into 3 groups underweight, normal, obese (include both overweight and DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 81 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E Variables Mean ± SE Underweight (N = 54) Normal BMI (N = 64) Overweight & obese (N = 32) Height (m) 1.62 ± 0 .01 1.6 ± 0 .01 1.61 ± .02 Weight (kg) 47.9 ± 1.6 61.1 ± 1.3 75.1 ± 1.1 BMI (kg/m2) 18.2 ± 0.5 22.5 ± 0.4 29.0 ± 0.5 Waist circumference(cm) 64.4 ± 0.9 71.7 ± 0.8 80.9 ± 1.1 Triceps skinfold(mm) 12.8 ± 0.7 18.1 ± 0.6 26.4 ± 0.9 Fat % (t) 15.4 ± 0.6 20.2 ± 0.5 27.7 ± 0.8 Subscapular skinfold(mm) 13.5 ± 0.7 17.7 ± 0.6 28.0 ± 0.9 Fat % (s) 15.7 ± 0.7 19.8 ± 0.6 30.0 ± 0.9 FFM (t) (kg) 40.6 ± 0.7 47.5 ± 0.6 55.0 ± 0.8 FFM (s) (kg) 40.5 ± 0.6 47.7 ± 0.6 53.0 ± 0.8 FEV1 (L) 2.592 ± .059 2.856 ± .053 2.781 ± .075 FVC (L) 3.139 ± .069 3.418 ± .061 3.202 ± .088 FEV1% 82.63 ± .72 83.68 ± .64 85.59 ± .93 T 1: Anthropometric and Spirometric Measurements According to BMI Class. *FFM: fat free mass, (t): calculated using triceps skinfold, (s): calculated using subscapular skinfold. obese BMI > 25kg/m2) according to WHO classification [22]. Table 1 shows means of anthropometric and spirometric measurements in different to BMI classes. To assess the effect of anthropometric measurement on lung function test (LFT) parameters Pearson correlation was done (table 2). BMI and WC showed significant positive correlation with FEV1( (P = .016) and (P = .003) respectively),and FEV1% ( (P = .005) and (P < .005) respectively). Body fat % showed a highly significant positive association with FEV1% (P = 0.002). To determine the effect of overweight and obesity in lung function test ANOVA test was done to compare the means of the three BMI groups. Underweight subjects had a significantly lower FEV1 than normal BMI and obese subjects (P = 0.03) (Figure 2). FVC was significantly higher in normal BMI subjects compared to the other two groups (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference between underweight and obese subjects in FVC (Figure ??). FEV1% was significantly higher in the overweight and obese group compared to the other two groups (P = .02). DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 82 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E Body Measurements FEV1 FVC FEV1% Weight 0.294 (P = .000)* .184 (P = .024) * .231 (P = .005) * BMI .196 (P = .016) * .084 (P = .306) .229 (P = .005) * waist circumference .245 (P = .003) * .107 (P = .191) .309 (P = .000) * Fat % t .064 (P = .438) -.010 (P = .899) .191 (P = .020) * Fat % s .067 (P = .414) -.025 (P = .764) .248 (P = .002) * FFM- t .392 (P = .000) * .289 (P = .000) * .189 (P = .021) * FFM- s .407 (P = .000) * .318 (P = .000) * .139 (P = .090) T 2: Correlations between Body Measurements and Lung Function Parameters. * P values (<0.05 is significant, <0.005 is highly significant). (-) indicates negative correlation. Figure 1: Means of FEV1 in Different BMI Groups. Figure 2: Means of FVC in Different BMI Groups. 4. Discussion In this study obese subjects had the highest mean of BF %, but they also had the highest mean of FFM as well (table 1). The increase in BW in the study group could be explained partially by the physical growth involving skeletal frame, muscles and fat. This means that subjects in the obese group were overfed females with excessive energy intake and minimal exercise, therefore they deposited more fat. They had a good nutritional status which leads to development of good muscle bulk (more FFM). DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 83 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E 4.1. Effect of Body Composition on Ventilation Parameters We found that the subgroup with normal BMI had the highest mean of both FEV1 and FVC, while underweight ones had the lowest mean of both FEV1 and FVC. Well- developed muscles especially of the chest wall are expected to influence all forced expiratory parameters. Being underweight with small muscle bulk may reduce the lung volumes. FVC showed a significant positive association with BW (P = .02). The increase in BW in this young females group reflects increase in both muscle bulk and body fat with predominant effect of muscle bulk on LF. Contrary to expectations FVC had no significant association with BMI in the present sample. The effect of BMI may be clearer in older age group. BF% showed a negative correlation with FVC but it was not significant. The present results agreed partially with Lazarus et al results who found that adjusted FVC was not significantly associated with BMI, but was negatively associated with BF% in men and women [17]. Therefore, it was justified to look for the FFM and its correlation with LF parameters because: the number of overweight and obese is too small to show the effect of increased BMI or body fat on LF. FVC showed positive correlation with BW and not with BMI. In addition, underweight had the lowest FVC. From the previous results muscle mass is more likely to affect the lung parameters. The results showed a highly positive association between FFM and FVC (P = .000) as shown in table 2; which agrees with Lazarus et al results [17]. In Cotes et al study, this association was insignificant in women but not for women who perform much exercise [14]. Unlike the results of Chen et al in which WC, but not BMI, is negatively associated with LF [15]; there was no association between WC and FVC in this sample. This is most probably due to the opposing effects of fat and muscle in these young females. FEV1had highly significant positive association with BW, FFM and WC (P < .005); and a positive significant association with BMI (P = .01). This can be explained by the effect of the good muscle bulk on forced expiration. FEV1 % had a highly significant positive correlation with BW and BMI (P = .005), because these measures caused a significant increase in FEV1 and a slight or no increase in FVC (table 2). In contrary to Heather et al results which showed a negative association between WC and FEV1 % [18], there was a highly significant positive correlation between them in this study (P < .005). The increase in WC in these young females was associated with the increase in muscles mass (causing increase FEV1) as well as fat (causing insignificant effect on FVC) and therefore a positive association with FEV1 %. In addition, there was a positive highly significant association between FEV1 % and BF% calculated from the subscapular skinfold (P = .002) and triceps skinfold (P = .02). FEV1% was significantly higher in the overweight and obese group compared DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 84 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E to the other two groups (P = .02). Thus, results of LFT in healthy obese persons may give a restrictive pattern. This may be due to the mechanical load impeding expansion of the chest wall during inspiration. Future studies may yield more conclusive results if more sensitive estimates of muscle mass are employed in different age group. 4.2. Effect of BMI on Ventilation Parameters In this study BMI class had a significant effect on FEV1 (P = .004), FVC (P = .008) and on FEV1 % (P = .04). Underweight subjects had significantly lower FEV1compared to normal BMI and obese subjects. There was no significant difference in FEV1 between obese and normal BMI subjects, which support the hypothesis that the effect of increase muscle mass is likely to offsets the effect of fatness on FEV1. In agreement with previous studies which have demonstrated that a rise in BMI lowers FEV1 and FVC [12, 13]; this study showed that FVC was significantly reduced in the obese and underweight group compared to normal BMI subjects (P < .05). There was no significant difference in FVC between obese and underweight subjects. This means that both obese and underweight had a significant reduction in FVC compared to normal weight females. 5. Conclusion The higher FEV1% in the overweight and obese group compared to the other two groups and the positive association of body fat, body weight, WC and high BMI with FEV1% suggests that obese subjects may show a restrictive pattern in LFT. On the other hand, underweight subjects may have a significant reduction in lung function. We suggest that more anthropometric measurements should be taken into account for the assessment of lung function. 6. Ethics Approval This study was approved by the Department of Physiology-Faculty of Medicine- Uni- versity of Khartoum. Each participant signed an informed consent form. 7. Competing Interests No areas of competing interest of this study. DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 85 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E 8. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the members of Physiology Department Faculty of Medicine University of Khartoum for their collaboration. Great appreciation and thanks to Profes- sor Mohammed Khair Abdalla Professor of Genetics in Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum for data management and statistical advices. 9. The Author Contributions 1. Study concept and design: Professor Mohammed Yousif Sukkar. 2. Collection of data: Dr. Nouralsalhin Abdalhamid Alaagib. 3. Analysis and interpretation of data Professor Mohammed Yousif Sukkar and Dr. Nouralsalhin Abdalhamid Alaagib. 10. Availability of Data and Material Data is available in Excel form and can be provided when requested. References [1] D. J. Chinn, J. E. Cotes, and J. W. Reed, “Longitudinal effects of change in body mass on measurements of ventilatory capacity,” Thorax, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 699–704, 1996. [2] M. Golshan, M. Nematbakhsh, B. Amra, and R. O. Crapo, “Spirometric reference values in a large Middle Eastern population,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 529–534, 2003. [3] C. M. Salome, G. G. King, and N. Berend, “Physiology of obesity and effects on lung function,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 206–211, 2010. [4] A. M. Li, “The effects of obesity on pulmonary function,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 361–363. [5] H. Sahebjami and P. S. Gartside, “Pulmonary function in obese subjects with a normal FEV1/FVC ratio,” Chest, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 1425–1429, 1996. [6] D. D. Sin, R. L. Jones, and S. F. Paul Man, “Obesity is a risk factor for dyspnea but not for airflow obstruction,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 162, no. 13, pp. 1477– 1481, 2002. [7] C. A. Camargo Jr., S. T. Weiss, S. Zhang, W. C. Willett, and F. E. Speizer, “Prospective study of body mass index, weight change, and risk of adult-onset asthma in women,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 21, pp. 2582–2588, 1999. DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 86 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E [8] S. Chinn, D. Jarvis, and P. Burney, “Relation of bronchial responsiveness to body mass index in the ECRHS,” Thorax, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1028–1033, 2002. [9] L. M. Schachter, C. M. Salome, J. K. Peat, and A. J. Woolcock, “Obesity is a risk for asthma and wheeze but not airway hyperresponsiveness,” Thorax, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 2001. [10] R. L. Jones and M.-M. U. Nzekwu, “The effects of body mass index on lung volumes,” Chest, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 827–833, 2006. [11] M. Bottai, F. Pistelli, F. Di Pede et al., “Longitudinal changes of body mass index, spirometry and diffusion in a general population,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 665–673, 2002. [12] K. M. McClean, F. Kee, I. S. Young, and J. S. Elborn, “Obesity and the lung: 1 · Epidemiology,” Thorax, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 649–654, 2008. [13] K. M. McClean, C. R. Cardwell, and F. Kee, “Longitudinal change in BMI and lung function in middle-aged men in Northern Ireland,” Ir J Med Sci, vol. 176, p. S418, 2007. [14] J. E. Cotes, D. J. Chinn, and J. W. Reed, “Body mass, fat percentage, and fat free mass as reference variables for lung function: effects on terms for age and sex,” Thorax, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 839–844, 2001. [15] Y. Chen, D. Rennie, Y. Cormier, and J. A. Dosman, “Waist circumference is associated with pulmonary function in normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects,” Am J ClinNutr, vol. 85, pp. 35–39, 2007. [16] L. C. Collins, P. D. Hoberty, J. F. Walker, E. C. Fletcher, and A. N. Peiris, “The effect of body fat distribution on pulmonary function tests,” Chest, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 1298–1302, 1995. [17] R. Lazarus, D. Sparrow, and S. T. Weiss, “Effects of obesity and fat distribution on ventilatory function: The normative aging study,” Chest, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 891–898, 1997. [18] H. M. Ochs-Balcom, B. J. B. Grant, P. Muti et al., “Pulmonary function and abdominal adiposity in the general population,” Chest, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 853–862, 2006. [19] J. V. Durnin and J. Womersley, “Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 1974. [20] J. Parízková and P. Bůzková, “Relationship between skinfold thickness measured by Harpenden caliper and densitometric analysis of total body fat in men.,” Human Biology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 1971. [21] American Thoracic Society, “Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1107–1136, 1995. DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 87 Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Production and Hosting by Knowledge E [22] World Health Organization, Obesity and Overweight. World Health Organization Global strategy on Diet, Physical activity and Health, 2003. DOI 10.18502/sjms.v12i2.918 Page 88 Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Effect of Body Composition on Ventilation Parameters Effect of BMI on Ventilation Parameters Conclusion Ethics Approval Competing Interests Acknowledgements The Author Contributions Availability of Data and Material References