SQU Journal for Science, 2017, 22(2), 73-80 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/squjs.vol22iss2pp73-80 Sultan Qaboos University 73 Synthesis and coordination chemistry of boron-functionalized poly(pyrazolylpyridyl)borate with Ln(III) metals Nawal K. Al-Rasbi* 1 and Michael D. Ward 2 1 Department of Chemistry, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, PC 123, Al-Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman; 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HF, UK. Email: nrasbi@squ.edu.om ABSTRACT: A new family of lanthanide/boron-based complexes have been synthesized from the novel substituted poly(pyrazolylpyridyl)borate ligand containing phenyl substituents on the boron atom Ph2Bp py (L). The complexes have been fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic methods. The single crystal X-ray structure and mass spectroscopy reveal the isostructural dinuclear complexes: [Ln2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2] where Ln = Eu, Gd or Tb. Upon excitation of the Ln(III) complexes in DCM, their luminescence spectra display narrow f–f transitions. It is found that the ligand can efficiently sensitize the Tb(III) complex because of the better triplet state energy match to the Tb(III)– 5 D0 excited states. Keywords: Boron; europium(III); terbium(III); crystal structure; emission. مركبات البورون مع بايروزول بيريدين وفلزات الالنثاناتلالتركيب والخصائص الكيميائية مايكل د. وورد و نوال الراسبي مجموعتي فينول ملتصقة يحتوي علىوالذي من ليجند البورون مع بايروزول بيريدين الالنثانات/بورون ركباتمعائلة جديدة لتم تكوين :صالملخ Ph2Bp بذرة البورون py (L) . المعقد ثنائي الفلز: ثبت التركيب البلوريأكما[Ln2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2] حيثLn = Eu, Gd or Tb . ا لمركب التيربيوم ضوئي. وجدنا بأن الليجند يستطيع أن يتحسس f–fمركبات ف محاليلها على انتقاالت ضوئية بطبيعة الطيف الضوئي لل دلولقد بفعالية وذلك ألقتراب مستويات الطاقة بينهما. .طيف ضوئي بلوري، تركيب(، IIIتيربيوم) ،(IIIبيوم)ييور ،ورونب: مفتاحيةالكلمات ال 1. Introduction oron, the only non-metal of Group 13, displays a unique structural diversity in its combinations with transition metals [1]. The enormous diversity of boron chemistry ranges from polyboranes [2] to carboranes [3] to metallaboranes [4] and metal complexes of organoboron ligands [5]. In 1966, poly(pyrazolyl)borates were first reported by S. Trofimenko [6]. The poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands have been proven to be extremely popular amongst coordination chemists for a wide range of applications because of their ease of synthesis, ease of functionalisation, and the steric protection which they afford to metal centres [7]. Over the years poly(pyrazolyl)borates such as bidentate Bp ligands have been compared to -diketonates (Chart 1) [5]. These 'first-generation' ligands are labile, rich in electron density and their coordination behavior is strongly dependent on the coordinating metal [8-11] In subsequent years, a new class of C 3 -substituted poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands were developed in which additional coordinating groups have been attached to the pyrazolyl rings, completely changing the character of the simple first-generation ligands. Constituents such as pyridine [12]. (Bp py in Chart 1), bipyridyl, [13] thioanisyl, [14] pyrazinyl, [15] and carboxamide [16] units have B https://mail.squ.edu.om/owa/redir.aspx?SURL=oRzEbDj-y_8X0lHITn4bqqUR0J4qCh67eLAWngdq7EmUNTL360vTCG0AYQBpAGwAdABvADoAdQAwADkAMwAxADkANgBAAHMAdAB1AGQAZQBuAHQALgBzAHEAdQAuAGUAZAB1AC4AbwBtAA..&URL=mailto%3au093196%40student.squ.edu.om NAWAL K. AL-RASBI and MICHAEL D. WARD 74 been appended to the pyrazolyl C 3 positions of poly(pyrazolyl)borates, converting the ligands to polydentate chelates. The Ward group prepared new ligands by the attachment of a 2-pyridyl substituent to each pyrazolyl ring at the C 3 position converting each 'arm' of the ligand to a tridentate chelate [17-18]. Substitution of poly(pyrazolyl)borates is also confined largely to the boron atom [5]. The potentially reactive B–H bonds in Bp py , may be replaced with either alkyl or aryl groups. Suitably sized ligand substituents can help to prevent agostic interaction through steric blocking of the space above and below the poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands [19-20]. Substituents on the boron atom of Bp ligands have shown great stability such as on [(Ph2Bp)2Ni]. [21] Whilst the complex [(H2Bp)Ag] is air-sensitive, the analogue [(Ph2Bp)Ag] is very stable, [22] suggesting that the stability of these complexes result from a combination of steric effects and not just solely from the aromatic substituents on the pyrazolyl rings. As part of our interest in luminescent lanthanide complexes, we describe the synthesis, crystal structure and luminescence behavior of a series of lanthanide complexes with the boron-substituted bis(pyrazolylpyridyl)borate ligand: Ph2Bp py (L) (Chart1) in which two bidentate arms are connected to a boron centre. The incorporation of two phenyl units at the boron centre has altered its sensitization properties to Eu(III) and Tb(III) ions. The X-ray crystal structure confirmed the general formulae of the complexes to be: [Ln2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2] where Ln = Eu, Gd or Tb. Chart 1: The structures of the poly(pyrazolyl)borates: Bp, Tp, Bp py and Ph2Bp py (L). 2. Experimental The Boron ligand was prepared according to the method described by Trofimenko [19]. L (Na[Ph2Bp py ]): 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole (0.6 g, 4.14 mmol) and NaBPh4 (0.58 g, 1.70 mmol) were ground together finely and heated gradually to 190 °C for 4 hrs under N2. During this time, H2 gas was evolved at 150 °C and then benzene was evolved at 190 °C. Any unreacted 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole sublimed at the top of the flask. After cooling to r.t.; the melt was washed with hot toluene (15 mL) and hexane (15 mL) and finally dissolved in CH2Cl2 and concentrated in vacuum to yield 0.50 g of white powder (60%). Positive-ion electrospray MS: m/z 477 [M + ]. IR(KBr) 1021 cm –1 (B–C). 11 B NMR (CDCl3): –0.819. Found: C, 70.61; H, 5.09; N, 17.49. Required for C28H22N6BNa: C, 70.63; H, 4.62; N, 17.65%. Synthesis of the complexes The complexes were prepared by combining equimolar quantities of Eu(NO3)3, Gd(NO3)3 or Tb(NO3)3 with the ligand in MeOH and left to stand for 1 hr during which time a precipitate was formed. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with MeOH to give a powder. 7 Characterization data for the complexes are as follows: [Eu2(L)2(OH)2(NO3)2]. Yield 70 %. ES-MS: m/z 1310 {[Eu2(Ph2Bp py )2(OH)2(NO3)]} + . IR(KBr) 1001 cm –1 (B–C). [Gd2(L)2(OH)2(NO3)2]. Yield 72 %. ES-MS: m/z 1253 {[Gd2(Ph2Bp py )2(OH)2]} 2+ and 1316 {[Gd2(Ph2Bp py )2(OH)2(NO3)]} + . IR(KBr) 1003 cm –1 (B–C). X-ray quality crystals were grown by slow evaporation of a DCM solution of the complex in air. [Tb2(L)2(OH)2(NO3)2]. Yield 70 %. ES-MS: m/z 1318 {[Tb2(Ph2Bp py )2(OH)2(NO3)]} + . IR(KBr) 1001 cm –1 (B–C). Spectro-fluorimetric measurements UV-visible spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 50 conc UV-visible spectrophotometer in range 250-800 nm. Quartz cuvettes of 1 cm path length were used and solvent background corrections were applied. Steady state fluorescence spectra in solid and solution states were recorded on an Edinburogh FS5 fluorimeter. The solid state B N N N N N N B N N N N N N H H L = Ph2Bp pyBppyTp Bp SYNTHESIS AND COORDINATION CHEMISTRY 75 phosphorescence lifetime measurements for the Ln(III) complexes were measured on Perkin-Elmer LS50B Fluorimeter at RT and 77 K. Crystallography Single crystals of the complex GdL was obtained as detailed above. Data was collected at 100 K, using Bruker APEX-II CCD diffractometer equipped with Mo-Kα radiation. Absorption corrections were applied in each case using SADABS. [28] The structures were solved by direct methods or heavy atom Patterson methods and refined by full matrix least squares methods on F 2 using SHELXL-97. [29] The hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically with isotropic thermal parameters. Crystallography data (excluding the structure factors) for the reported structure have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. 3. Results and discussion The synthesis of the new bi(pyrazolylpyridyl)borate ligand: Ph2Bp py (L) is outlined in Scheme 1. The key intermediates for formation of the ligand is 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole, which is prepared from 2-acetylpyridine, in the usual two-step procedure for conversion of acetyl groups to pyrazole groups. [23] Then, L was prepared by reaction of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole with KBPh4 in a melt at 190 °C until benzene vapour is no more evolved. [24] Satisfactory elemental analysis, FAB mass spectra, [11] B NMR and 1 H NMR spectra confirmed the formulation of the ligand. B N N N N N N L = Ph2Bp py N O DMA-DMF N O NMe2 NH2-NH2 N N N H KBPh4 190ºC reflux Scheme 1. Schematic route for the synthesis of Ph2Bp. Reaction of L with nitrate salts of Eu(III), Gd(III) or Tb(III) in MeOH afforded white precipitates respectively. X-ray quality crystals were grown by slow evaporation of their solutions in dichloromethane, DCM. The complexes were satisfactorily characterised by FAB mass spectrometry. For example, the fragment: {[M2(L)2(OH)2(NO3)]} 2+ was observed at m/z 1310, 1316 and 1318 respectively for Eu(III), Gd(III) or Tb(III) complexes. The crystal structure of [Gd2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2]·CH2Cl2 (GdL) in Figure 1 has proved to be a dinuclear complex in which each ligand donates two bidentate sites to one metal ion, with the two metal centres bridged through two hydroxyl groups. The coordination environment about each metal centre is 8-coordinate and best described as a square antiprismatic, having an equatorial belt of four N atoms from [L] – with two bridging hydroxyl groups and one bidentate chelating (NO3) – in the axial positions on either side of the MN4 plane. The four N-donor atoms from each [L] – ligand form a plane, with the Gd(III) centre lying 0.33 Å out of the N4 plane. The angle between the two Gd(NN) planes is 14.3°. The metal–ligand bond distances exhibit a Gd–N(py) bonds are on average significantly longer than the Gd–N(pz) bonds and are comparable to previously reported complexes. [12-13] Selected bond distances and angles are listed in Table 1. It is also worth noting that replacement of the hydrogen atoms in Bp by two phenyl rings in Ph 2Bp py (L) changes the coordination behaviour of the ligand compared to functionalized Bp which yielded mononuclear NAWAL K. AL-RASBI and MICHAEL D. WARD 76 complexes with Ln(III) ions. [12] The steric effects caused by the phenyl rings play a big role in the new structure. Intra-molecular O–H··· hydrogen-bonding interactions (~2.9 Å) are observed, involving one phenyl ring and the coordinating hydroxyl group, which clearly plays an important role in stabilising this complex. The steric interactions within the Gd(III) complex are shown in Figure 1 (Bottom). Other ··· and ···CH stacking interactions between the aromatic rings and the solvent molecules, were observed in the molecular packing. Figure 1 Top: The crystal structure of GdL showing the two hydroxyl bridges. Bottom: The -interactions within the molecule. Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (˚) for GdL. Gd(1)-O(1H)#1 [a] 2.253(5) Gd(1)-N(11) 2.496(6) Gd(1)-O(1H) 2.284(5) Gd(1)-N(31) 2.554(6) Gd(1)-O(1) 2.481(5) Gd(1)-N(1) 2.560(6) Gd(1)-N(21) 2.488(6) Gd(1)-Gd(1)#1 [a] 3.7240(15) Gd(1)-O(2) 2.491(5) O(1H)#1-Gd(1)-O(1H) [a] 69.9(2) O(1H)-Gd(1)-O(2) 77.26(18) O(1H)#1-Gd(1)-O(1) [a] 161.09(17) O(1)-Gd(1)-O(2) 51.43(17) O(1H)-Gd(1)-O(1) 128.68(17) N(21)-Gd(1)-O(2) 119.06(18) O(1H)#1-Gd(1)-N(21) [a] 85.19(18) O(1H)#1-Gd(1)-N(11) [a] 87.62(18) O(1H)-Gd(1)-N(21) 137.24(19) O(1H)-Gd(1)-N(11) 135.33(18) O(1)-Gd(1)-N(21) 77.82(19) O(1)-Gd(1)-N(11) 79.98(18) O(1H)#1-Gd(1)-O(2 [a] 147.09(17) N(21)-Gd(1)-N(11) 74.63(18) [a] Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 -x,-y+1,-z+1. SYNTHESIS AND COORDINATION CHEMISTRY 77 Photo-physical properties The absorption spectrum of L in DCM is shown in Figure 2. It shows two strong transitions at 250 and 285 nm which can be attributed to ligand-centred   * transitions from (pyrazolyl/pyridine) units [25]. Figure 2. The absorption spectra of L and its Ln(III) complexes (1x10 -5 M) in DCM solutions at room temperature. Metal-centred luminescence The triplet state energy ( 3 *) of L can be determined from the phosphorescence spectrum of its Gd(III) complex recorded in a mixture of ethanol/methanol solution at 77K. Gd(III) ion lacks a low lying electronic acceptor level (>30,000 cm –1 ), so its luminescence features are associated with those of the coordinated ligand. From this emission spectrum, the ligand-based triplet state energy of GdL is 28,800 cm –1 (347 nm). The luminescence from the Eu(III) and Tb(III) complexes in DCM solution are presented in Figure 3. Excitation of the EuL at 345 nm in DCM results in intense red luminescence of Eu(III) showing characteristic peaks from the 5 D0  7 Fj transitions of Eu(III) at 558, 603, 626, 662 and 711 nm. This implies that energy-transfer from the ligand triplet state to the emissive 5 D0 level of Eu(III) (ca. 17500 cm -1 ) is favourable. The presence of the 5 D0 7 F0 transition proves the presence of the Eu(III) centres in a non-centrosymmetric site in EuL which agrees with the X-ray crystal structures. [26] Upon excitation of the Tb(III) complex, TbL, at 345 nm in CH2Cl2, its luminescence spectrum displays strong green emission from the 5 D4  7 F6-2 transitions at 632, 592, 550 and 496 nm. The energy difference between the triplet state energy of L and the 5 D4 level (20,500 cm –1 ) of Tb(III) is equal to ca. 8,300 cm – 1 . According to Latva’s empirical rule, optimal sensitization for the Tb(III) luminescence requires an energy gap E( 3 *– 5 D4) more than 1,850 cm –1 . [27] Therefore, L can sensitise the Tb(III) centre efficiently. By comparison to the Eu(III) complex, the situation is different. According to Latva’s empirical rule, for optimal ligand to Eu(III) energy transfer, the energy gap should be no more than 2,500 cm –1 . In fact the calculated energy differenceE( 3 *– 5 D0) is higher than this at around 11,300 cm –1 . Therefore, the ligands can poorly transfer energy to the 5 D0 excited states and hence the luminescence from Eu(III) is weak. This result is in agreement with their observed lifetime (obs) measurements. The phosphorescence decays of the Eu(III) and Tb(III) complexes with L in DCM are mono-exponential. The luminescence lifetime of Tb(III) is longer than that from Eu(III). Table 2. Summary of the photophysical data for L and its Ln(III) complexes. Compd max (nm) [(10 3 M -1 cm -1 ) in MeCN Lifetime at f-f (ms) [a] L 296(65), 248 (29) – EuL 293(36), 345 (sh) 0.56 GdL 294(45), 345 (sh) – TbL 294(43), 345 (sh) 0.84 [a]  in dry DCM, the estimated standard error < 1%. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 230 280 330 380 430 A b s o rp ti o n Wavelength/nm L EuL GdL TbL NAWAL K. AL-RASBI and MICHAEL D. WARD 78 Figure 3. Luminescence spectra of the Ln(III) complexes: (a) [Eu2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2] (EuL) and (b) [Tb2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2] (TbL) in (1x10 -5 M) DCM solutions at room temperature. 4. Conclusion The new boron-based ligand, L, which is derived from the well-known bis(pyrazolyl)borate core, has been synthesised and fully characterised. The X-ray crystal structure and MS analysis revealed the isostructural dinuclear complexes: [Ln2(L)2(NO3)2(OH)2], Ln = Eu, Gd and Tb. The metal centres are bridged through two hydroxyl groups. The steric effects caused by the aromatic substituents on the boron centre has played a big role in stabilizing the structures, through intra-molecular O–H··· hydrogen-bonding interactions. The photophysical investigations in DCM gave evidence that L is able to achieve ligand to metal energy transfer and intense red emission from Eu(III) and green emission from Tb(III) centres are observed in the visible region. Table 3. Crystallographic data for GdL. Formula C29H25BCl2GdN7O4 Formula weight 774.52 T (K) 100(2) K Crystal system Triclinic, P1̄ a (Å) 11.430(4) b (Å) 12.063(4) c (Å) 12.255(4)  (°) 85.638(17)  (°) 80.838(18) (°) 63.208(17) V(Å 3 ) 1489.1(8) Z 2 Dcalc 1.727  (mm-1) 2.455 Crystal size (mm) 0.16 x 0.08 x 0.04 Reflections collected 24005 Independent reflections 6845 [R(int) = 0.0887] Data / restraints / parameters 6845 / 4 / 392 Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.976 Final R indices a R1 = 0.0580, wR2 = 0.1419 Largest diff. peak and hole (e.Å -3 ) 3.722 and -1.756 Acknowledgement We would like to thank the department of Chemistry, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University for support. SYNTHESIS AND COORDINATION CHEMISTRY 79 Appendix Crystallographic data for the structure reported in this article have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center. A copy of the data can be obtained free of charge from the Director, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 IEZ, UK; fax: +44(0)1222-336033; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk. References 1. Braunschweig, H. and Colling, M. Transition metal complexes of boron — synthesis, structure and reactivity. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2001, 223, 1-51. 2. Alexandrova, A.N., Boldyrev, A.I., Zhai, H.-J. and Wang, L.-S. All-boron aromatic clusters as potential new inorganic ligands and building blocks in chemistry. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2006, 250, 2811-2866. 3. Grimes, R.N. Boron-carbon ring ligands in organometallic synthesis. Chemical Reviews, 1992, 92, 251-268. 4. Braunschweig, H. and Whittell, G.R. Boron as a bridging ligand. Chemistry, European Journal, 2005, 11, 6128-6133. 5. Trofimenko, S. Recent advances in poly(pyrazolyl)borate (scorpionate) chemistry. Chemical Reviews, 1993, 93, 943-980. 6. Trofimenko, S. Boron-pyrazole chemistry. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1966, 88, 1842-1844. 7. Adams, H., Batten, S.R., Davies, G.M., Duriska, M.B., Jeffery, J.C., Jensen, P., Lu, J., Motson, G.R., Coles, S.J., Hursthouse, M.B. and Ward, M.D. New bis-, tris- and tetrakis(pyrazolyl)borate ligands with 3- pyridyl and 4-pyridyl substituents: synthesis and coordination chemistry. Dalton Transaction, 2005, 1910- 1923. 8. Curtis, M.D., Shiu, K.B, Butler, W.M. and Hauffman, J.C. Syntheses, structures, and molecular orbital analysis of hydridotris(pyrazoly1)borate (Tp) molybdenum carbonyls: Paramagnetic TpMo(CO)3 and triply bonded Tp,Mo2(CO), (Mo= Mo). Journal of the American Chemical Society,1986, 108, 3335-3343. 9. Roundhill, S.G., Roundhill, D.M., Bloomquist, D.R., Landee, C., Willett, R.D., Dooley, D.M. and Gray, H.A. Molecular structure and magnetic properties of the chloro-bridged dimer chloro[hydrotris(1- pyrazolyl)borato]copper(II). Observation of a ferromagnetic ground state. Inorganic Chemistry, 1979, 18, 831-835. 10. Canty, J., Minchin, N.J., Engelhardt, L.M., Skelton, B.W. and White, A.H. Interaction of palladium(II) with polydentate ligands, including the synthesis and structure of bis[tris(pyrazol-1-yl)borato-N,N′]palladium(II) and the cations [Pd(L)2] 2+ [L = tris(pyrazol-1-yl)methane-N,N′ or tris(pyridin-2-yl)methane-N,N′]. Dalton Transaction, 1986, 645-650. 11. Trofimenko, S. Polypyrazolylborates: Scorpionates. Journal of Chemical Education, 2005, 82, 1715-1720. 12. Ward, M.D., McCleverty, J.A. and Jeffery, J.C. Coordination and supramolecular chemistry of multinucleating ligands containing two or more pyrazolyl-pyridine ‘arms’. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2001, 222, 251-272. 13. Psillakis, E., Jeffery, J.C., McCleverty, J.A. and Ward, M.D. A dinuclear double-helical complex of potassium ions with a compartmental bridging ligand containing two terdentate N-donor fragments. Journal of Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1997, 479-480. 14. Humphrey, E.R., Mann, K.L.V., Reeves, Z.R., Behrendt, A., Jeffery, J.C., McCleverty, J.A. and Ward, M.D. Copper(II) complexes of new potentially hexadentate N3S3- or N6-donor podand ligands based on the tris(pyrazolyl)borate or tris(pyrazolyl)methane core. New Journal of Chemistry, 1999, 23, 417-427. 15. Mann, K.L.V., Jeffery, J.C., McCleverty, J.A. and Ward, M.D. Synthesis of the new ligand bis[3-(2- pyrazinyl-pyrazol-1-yl) dihydroborate, and the crystal structures of its complexes with thallium(I) and lead(II). Polyhedron, 1999, 18, 721-727. 16. Rheingold, A.L., Incarvito, C.D. and Trofimenko, S. Hydrotris[3-(carboxypyrrolidido)pyrazol-1-yl]borate, the first proven N3O3-hexadentate homoscorpionate ligand. Journal of Chemical Society, Dalton Transaction, 2000, 1233-1234. 17. Paul, R.L., Amoroso, A.J., Jones, P.L., Couchman, S.M., Reeves, Z.R., Rees, L.H., Jeffery, J.C., McCleverty, J.A. and Ward, M.D. Effects of metal co-ordination geometry on self-assembly: a monomeric complex with trigonal prismatic metal co-ordination vs. tetrameric complexes with octahedral metal co-ordination. Journal of Chemical Society, Dalton Transaction, 1999, 1563-1568. 18. Davies, G.M., Adams, H. and Ward, M.D. Bis(1,3-diphenylpropane-1,3-dionato-κ 2 O,O′){hydrotris[3-(2- pyridyl)pyrazol-1-yl]borato}praseodymium(III): another member of an unpredictable series. Acta Crystallographica Section C, 2005, 61, m221-m223. 19. Trofimenko, S. Boron-pyrazole chemistry. IV. Carbon- and boron-substituted poly[(1-pyrazolyl) borates]. Journal of American Chemical Society, 1967, 89, 6288-6294. 20. Cotton, F.A. and Murillo, C.A. The structure of bis(diphenyldipyrazolylborato) nickel(II). Inorganica Chimica Acta, 1976, 17, 121-124. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010854501003782 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00108545 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2005/dt/b502892b http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2005/dt/b502892b http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1986/dt/dt9860000645 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1986/dt/dt9860000645 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1986/dt/dt9860000645 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1997/cc/a607984i http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1997/cc/a607984i http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1999/nj/a809777a http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1999/nj/a809777a http://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlelanding/1999/dt/a900805e http://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlelanding/1999/dt/a900805e http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00201693 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00201693 NAWAL K. AL-RASBI and MICHAEL D. WARD 80 21. Bruce, M.I. and Walsh, J.D. Chemistry of the group 1B elements. XIII. Complexes of Copper(I) or Silver(I) containing only poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 1979, 32, 2753-2756. 22. Fleming, J.S., Psillakis, E., Couchman, S.M., Jeffery, J.C., McCleverty, J.A. and Ward, M.D. Kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction of peroxides with manganese-reconstituted horseradish peroxidase: a stopped-flow transient kinetic investigation. Journal of Chemical Society, Dalton Transaction, 1998, 537-544. 23. Davies, G.M., Adams, H., Pope, S.J.A., Faulkner, S. and Ward, M.D. Photophysical properties of Pr(III) and Er(III) complexes of poly(pyrazolyl) borates. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 2005, 4, 829-834. 24. Picraux, L.B., Weldon, B.T. and McCusker, J.K. Intramolecular excimer formation in a naphthalene-appended dinuclear iron−oxo somplex. Inorganic Chemistry, 2003, 42, 273-282. 25. Tanner, P.A. Some misconceptions concerning the electronic spectra of tri-positive europium and cerium. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42, 5090-5101. 26. Latva, M., Takalo, H. and Mukkala, V.M., Matachescu, C., Rodriguez-Ubis, J.-C. and Kankare, J. Correlation between the lowest triplet state energy level of the ligand and lanthanide(III) luminescence quantum yield. Journal of Luminescence, 1997, 75, 149-169. 27. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS: A program for absorption correction with the Siemens SMART system. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1996. 28. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXS-97: A program for solution of crystal structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997. Received 18 April 2017 Accepted 21 September 2017 http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2005/pp/b508382f http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2005/pp/b508382f