Electromagnetic Modeling of the Propagation Characteristics of Satellite Communications Through Composite Precipitation Layers Science and Technology, 7 (2002) 101-107 © 2002 Sultan Qaboos University 101 Design of Ultra Fast RCE Photodetectors for Optical Communications systems Joseph A. Jervase and Hadj Bourdoucen Department of Information Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 33, Al Khod 123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Email: Jervase@squ.edu.om. تصميم المحسسات الضوئية لنظم االتصاالت فائقة السرعة جوزيف جرفيس وحاج بوردوسن يتمثل . التى تتحكم في نظم االتصاالت فائقة السرعة(RCE) تتناول هذه الورقة الحدان األساسيان للمحسسات الضوئية : خالصة م إيجاد شكل تحليلي لكفاءة الكم تتضمن الحدود الهيكلية هـذان الحـدان في كفاءة الكم وسعة التذبذب للمحسنات المستعملة ، لقد ت .واعتمادا على النتائج التمثيلية بواسطة الحاسوب، طورت خطة للتصميم المثالي لهذه المحسسات. لتصميم المحسس الضوئي ABSTRACT: Two key parameters for RCE photodetectors that govern their suitability for ultrafast optical communication systems are considered. These are the quantum efficiency and the bandwidth efficiency product. A closed analytical form has been derived for quantum efficiency, which incorporates the structural parameters of the photodetector. Based on the simulation results, an optimization and design procedure for these photodetectors has been developed. KEYWORDS: Cavity Resonators, Photodetectors, Photodiodes, Quantum Efficiency and Resonant- Cavity-Enhanced Photodetectors. 1. Introduction ptical photodetectors are the key components in optical communication systems. Their quantum efficiency and optical bandwidth characteristics are of major importance in the design of fiber optic based data communication systems. A number of structures and design optimization techniques have been proposed in the literature to achieve high values for these two parameters (Kishino, 1991), (Unlu, 1992, 1995, 1998), (Tan, 1995), (Murtaza 1996), (Tung, 1997), (Jervase, 1998, 2000). One of the promising types is the Resonant Cavity Enhanced (RCE) photodetector. In the RCE, the active region is placed inside a Fabry-Perot cavity between two mirrors made of quarter-wave stacks (QWS) to allow the signal light to have more than one absorbing path inside the active region (Kishino, 1991), (Unlu, 1992, 1995, 1998), (Tan, 1995), (Murtaza, 1996), (Tung, 1997), (Jervase, 1998, 2000), (Onat, 1998), (Ozbay, 1997). The resulting structure will need only a very thin absorbing intrinsic region to achieve high quantum efficiency as well as a high speed of response. Hence, RCE photodiodes with quantum efficiencies close to unity can be designed. In this work, the quantum efficiency is formulated in a closed analytical form. This includes the structural parameters of the photodetector and takes into consideration the wavelength dependence of the end mirrors reflectivities and the absorption coefficient of the intrinsic region. Using this formulation, an optimization and design procedure for RCE photodetectors has been developed and design charts have been generated with the quantum efficiency, quality factor and frequency bandwidth as input design parameters. O mailto:Jervase@squ.edu.om JOSEPH A. JERVASE and HADJ BOURDOUCEN 102 2. Analysis Figure 1 shows the integrated device of our investigation, which is based on the system of heterojunctions In0.53Ga0.47As/InP. The speed response for this type of PIN structure is mainly limited by the transit time and the diffusion time of photogenerated carriers in the space charge region and the neutral regions. It is also limited by the charging and discharging time for traps at the heterojunction interfaces and by the inherent and parasitic capacitances of the structure. The last two effects can be minimized by incorporating non-absorbing lateral layers having graded heterojunctions with the active region and to have the heterojunctions and the active region depleted of any trapped charges that might be stored. In addition, the introduction of super lattice bandgap grading layers can eliminate the interface hole trapping process and consequently decrease the capacitive effect on the generated carriers. To further improve the frequency bandwidth requirements, the active region should be shortened enough to minimize the transit time of the photogenerated carriers crossing it. To reduce the device dark current, several types of junction architectures have been proposed based on the enhancement of the barrier heights at the interfaces of the InGaAs active layer and the adjacent layers to decrease tunneling currents of minority carriers. PIN photodetectors based on InGaAs/InP have been analyzed by many researchers e.g. (Bottcher, 1992) and the references therein). In fact, the typical PIN photodiode configuration (Dentan, 1990) has been integrated in our proposed configuration for its simplicity and ease of fabrication as well as its realistic mathematical description. Si (λo/4) SiO 2 (λo/4) P+ InP N- InGaAs N+ M GaAs (λo/4) AlAs ( λo/4) GaAs (substrate) L 1 d L 2 x 0 Top QWS Bottom QWS Refractive index notation n 10 n 11 n 12 n ex (n 1s ) n n ex (n 20 ) n 21 n 22 n 2s Incident Light SiO 2 (λo /2) AlAs (λo/4) GaAs (λo /4) N InP P+ Figure 1. The RCE photodetector model. The expression for quantum efficiency for the RCE photodetector shown in Figure 1 will be derived following a similar approach to that used in (Kishino, 1991) and (Jervase, 1998). This technique is based on finding the reflectivities of the top and bottom mirrors separately DESIGN OF ULTR FAST RCE PHOTODETECTORS 103 and then using their values to determine the fields inside the cavity by considering the whole structure of the photodetector i.e. mirrors and cavity together. With reference to the device model shown in Figure 1 for the RCE photodetector, the quantum efficiency due to the power absorbed in the i-region may be expressed as follows, ( )( )( ) φ η α αα coseRR1 e1eR1R1 d2 21 dd 21 − −− + −+− = (1) where, [ ]{ }2121ex d)LL(2 ψψββφ ++++= (2) λ π β exex n2 = (3) λ π β n2 = (4) In the derivation of Eq. 1, the p- and n-regions are assumed to be transparent at the design resonant wavelength λ0=1.3µm.Thus αex=0 for the material adopted in the model (InP) at this wavelength. It is apparent from Eq. 1 that the external quantum efficiency depends on the design of the top and bottom QWS's (R1, ψ1, R2, ψ2), the choice of the materials for the cavity (α, n, nex) and its physical dimensions (d, L1, L2) as well as the operating wavelength (λ). Within the range of interest in this analysis (1.2µm < λ <1.5µm), there is no much variation in refractive indices of the different layers of the photodetector. This does not apply, however, to the i- region attenuation constant α. It has been shown in the literature that the absorption coefficient α of In0.53Ga0.47As is a function of wavelength and doping (Humphreys, 1985). Using the experimental results in (Humphreys, 1985), a nonlinear curve fitting technique has been used to obtain analytical expressions for α. With reference to Eq. 1, the maximum quantum efficiency occurs when [ ] πλψλψλβλβ 2)()(d)()LL)((2 2121ex =++++ , or multiples thereof. It then follows that (Kishino, 1991), (Jervase, 1998), ( )( )( ) d2 21 dd 21 peak eRR1 e1eR1R1 α αα η − −− + −+− = (5) This expression is used in a constrained optimization procedure for the design of RCE photodetectors with maximum quantum efficiency. Equation 5 serves as a check on the optimized values (L1, L2, d) in whether they yield the maximum quantum efficiency. The design procedure developed is summarized below: Step 1: Specify the resonant wavelength λ0, the quantum efficiency η, the quality factor Q and the frequency bandwidth BW. Step 2: Select the materials for the cavity and the quarter-wave-stacks (QWS’s). Step 3: Design the QWS’s with the following guidelines: Choose the number of layers N2 to achieve a reflectivity R2 at λ0 close to unity for the bottom QWS. Choose the number of layers N1 to achieve a reflectivity 0.6 λ0 and lower off-resonance peak for λ0.This is due to the fact that α monotonically decreases with λ. Following a design and optimization procedure, all the sets of values obtained previously for d, L1 and L2 were used to obtain the quality factor Q corresponding to every spectrum of quantum efficiency η. The objective is to obtain design charts relating the quality factor Q to the maximum achievable quantum efficiency ηmax for a given structure dimensions. The JOSEPH A. JERVASE and HADJ BOURDOUCEN 106 varied, quantum efficiency increases, peaks at d=0.1µm and then decreases. Thus, there is an optimum value for d, which achieves maximum quantum efficiency. The BW and BWE on the other hand, decrease with increasing d. Thus, for d=0.1µm, which corresponds to maximum quantum efficiency of 0.99 the BWE is 290GHz. It is worth pointing out here that the simulated values for BWE merely serve as upper limits for the bandwidth-efficiency product. In practice, other parasitic factors, such as the leakage RC, will lower the achievable values. d (µ m) Figure 4. Variation of efficiency η and bandwidth-efficiency product BWE with active region width d. 4. Conclusion The quantum efficiency and bandwidth-efficiency product of resonant-cavity enhanced photodetectors (RCE) has been formulated in closed analytical forms that incorporate device structural parameters. A search and optimization-based procedure has been developed with the quantum efficiency, quality factor and frequency bandwidth as input design parameters. Design charts relating the quality factor Q to the maximum achievable quantum efficiency ηmax for a given structure dimensions have also been generated. References BOTTCHER, E.H., KUHL, D., HIERONYMI, F., DROGE, E., WOLF, T. and BIMBERG, D. 1992. Ultrafast semi-insulating InP:Fe-InGaAs:Fe-InP:Fe MSM photodetectors: Modeling and Performance, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 28: 2343-2357. DENTAN, M. and CREMOUX, D.DE. 1990. Numerical solution of the nonlinear response of a p- i-n photodiode under high illumination, J. Lightwave Technol., 8: 1137-1144. HUMPHREYS, D.A., KING, R.J., JENKINS, D., and MOSELEY, A.J. 1985. Measurement of absorption coefficients of Ga0.47In0.53As over the wavelength range 1.0-1.7µm, Electron. Lett., 21: 1187-1189. JERVASE, J.A. and BOURDOUCEN, H. 2000. Design of resonant-cavity-enhanced photodetectors using genetic algorithms, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 36: 325-332. JERVASE, J.A. and ZEBDA, Y. 1998. Characteristic analysis of resonant cavity enhanced (RCE) photodetectors, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 34: 1129-1134. DESIGN OF ULTR FAST RCE PHOTODETECTORS 107 KATO, K. 1999. Ultrawide-Band/High-Frequency Photodetectors'', IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 47: 1265-1281. KISHINO, K., SELIM, M.U., CHYI, REED, J.I., ARSENAULT, L., and MORKOC, H. 1991. Resonant cavity-enhanced (RCE) photodetectors'', IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 27: 2025- 2034. KOVAC, J., UHEREK, F., SATKA, A., JAKABOVIC, J., SRNANEK, R., RHEINLANDER, B., GOTTSCHALCH, V., HASENOHRL, S., NOVAK, J., BARNA, P., BARNA, A. and WOOD, J. 1996. InAlGaAs-InGaAs-InP RCE pin photodiode for 1300nm wavelength region, IPRM'96 Proc., Apr. 21-25, Germany, pp 219-222. MURTAZA, S.S., NIE, H., CAMPELL, J.C., BEAN, J.C. and PETICOLAS, L.J. 1996. Short- wavelength, high-speed Si-based resonant-cavity photodetectors, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 8: 927-929. MURTAZA, S.S., TAN, I.-H., BOWERS, J.E., HU, E.L., ANSELM, K.A., ISLAM, M.R., CHELAKARA, R.V., DUPUIS, R.D., STREETMAN, B.G., and CAMPBELL, J.C. 1996, High-finesse resonant-cavity photodetectors with an adjustable resonance frequency, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., 14: 1081-1089. ONAT, B.M., GOKKAVAS, OZBAY, M., E., ATA, E.P., TOWE, E., and UNLU, M.S. 1998. 100- GHz resonant cavity enhanced Schottky photodiodes'', IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 10: 707- 709. OZBAY, E., SAIFUL ISLAM, M., ONAT, B., GOKKAVAS, AYTUR, M.O., TUTTLE, G., TOWE, E., HENDERSON, R.H., and UNLU, M.S. 1997. Fabrication of high-speed resonant- cavity-enhanced Schottky photodiodes, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 9: 672-674. SALEM, A.F. and BRENNAN, K.F. 1995. Theoretical study of the response of InGaAs metal- semiconductor-metal photodetectors, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 31: 944-953. TAN, I-H., HU, E.L., BOWERS, J.E., and MILLER, B.I. 1995. Modeling and performance of wafer-fused resonant-cavity enhanced photodetectors, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 31: 1863- 1875. TUNG, H.-H. and LEE, C.-P. 1997. Design of a resonant-cavity-enhanced photodetector for high- speed applications, IEEE J. Quantum Electron, 33: 753-760. UNLU, M.S. and STRITE, S. 1995. Resonant cavity enhanced photonic devices, J. Appl. Phys., 78: 607-639. UNLU, M.S., GOKKAVAS, M., ONAT, B.M., ATA, E., OZBAY, E., MIRIN, R.P., KNOPP, K.J., BERTNESS, K.A., and CHRISTENSEN, D.H. 1998. High bandwidth-efficiency resonant cavity enhanced Schottky photodiodes for 800-850 nm wavelength operation, J. Appl. Lett., 72: 2727-2729. UNLU, M.S., KISHINO, K., LIAW, H.J., and MORKOC, H. 1992. A theoretical study of cavity- enhanced photodetectors with Ge and Si active regions, J. Appl. Phys., 71: 4049-4058. Received 23 June 2001 Accepted 6 November 2001 Joseph A. Jervase and Hadj Bourdoucen Analysis Results References