SQU Journal for Science, 2020, 25(1), 10-16 DOI:10.24200/squjs.vol25iss1pp10-16 Sultan Qaboos University 10 Nutrient Content, in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics and Antimethanogenic Potential of Three Algerian Asteraceae Species Serine Amokrane 1 *, Rabah Arhab 2 , Serina Calabro 3 , Raffaella Tudisco 3 , and Federico Infascelli 3 , Moufida Aggoun 4 1 Biotechnology Research Center (C.R.Bt), Biotechnology and Environment Division, Ali Mendjli, Nouvelle Ville, UV 03 BP E73 Constantine, Algeria; 2 Natural and Life Sciences Department, Exact Sciences and Natural and Life Sciences Faculty, Larbi Ben M’Hidi University, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria; 3 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production (DMVPA), University of Napoli Federico II, Via F Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy; 4 Nutrition, Food and Agri-Food Technologies Institute (INATAA), Mentouri Brothers University, Constantine, Algeria.*Email: s.amokrane @crbt.dz-am. ABSTRACT: The in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and the antimethanogenic potential of three Asteraceae species: Chamaemelum nobile, Centaurea pulata and Chrysanthemum segetum were determined. Serum bottles containing 200 mg of each plant and 30 ml of the culture medium (artificial saliva plus rumen juice) were incubated for 24 h. After incubation, pH, volatile fatty acid (VFA), ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) productions were recorded. Methanogens and protozoa were quantified using a Real Time PCR technique (qPCR). Cumulative gas productions, in vitro organic matter digestibility and VFA were not significantly affected by the added species when compared to the control (P > 0.05). The effects of Chamaemelum nobile and Chrysanthemum segetum on methane production, NH3 and acetate to propionate ratio (C2:C3) were similar. The two species were able to modulate rumen fermentation to produce significantly lower CH4 concentrations (-24.3% and -27.1%, respectively) compared to the control. C.pulata produced the highest cumulative gas and stimulated the microbial metabolism with an increase in C2:C3 ratio, NH3 and methane production (P < 0.05). No significant effect of the three species on methanogenic Archaea and protozoa was registered (P > 0.05). The three species studied herein show a good potential for mitigating ruminal methane production without any undesirable effects on the main fermentation parameters. Keywords: Asteraceae; Achaea bacteria; Gas production; Methane; Protozoa and Ruminal fermentation. المحتوى الغذائي، خصائص تخمر الكرش المخبري و اإلمكانات المضادة إلنبعاث الميثان لثالثة أنواع أستراسيا جزائرية يليانفيس، سيرينا كالبروا، رافييال توديسكو و فيديريكو ونقع أرحاب، موفيدا ابحر، أمقران سيرن تم اختيارها عموما لوفرتها في Chrysanthemum segetumو Chamaemelum nobile ،Centaurea pulata : اأسترا سي نواعأ ثالثة :صلخمال تم حضن زجاجات المصل الحاوية .ستخدام تقنية إنتاج الغاز المخبريإنبعاث الميثان بالمراعي الطبيعية شرق الجزائر لتقييم إمكاناتها الغدائية و المضادة إل تم قياس معدل الحموضة ،ساعة. بعد ذالك 02 لمدةصطناعي و عصير الكرش( مل من الوسط الغذائي )اللعاب اإل 02مغ من كل نبتة مع 022ل وقت ال PCR تقنيةباالعتماد على بكتيريا الكرش المنتجة للميثان و البر وتوزواالميثان. تم تحديد كمية ، إنتاج الغاز ومونيااأل ،االحماض الدهنية المتطايرة، .الحقيقي P)حماض الدهنية المتطايرة بشكل ملموس في األنواع المضافة مقارنة بالمرجعنتاج األ، وإالهضم المخبري للمادة العضوية ،لم يتأثر إنتاج الغاز التراكمي كان . البروبيونات نفسه/مونيا وعلى نسبة الخالتاأل ،على إنتاج الميثان Chrysanthemum segetumو Chamaemelum nobile.كان تأثير (0.05 < أنتجت (.٪ على التوالي02,1-و 02,0-)القدرة على تعديل التخمر في الكرش إلنتاج تراكيز من الميثان أقل بكثير مقارنة بالمرجعلنفس النوعين C.pulata االمونيا والميثان و البروبيونا/الخالتيض الميكروبي مع زيادة في نسبة الغاز التراكمي و حفزت األ كمية أكثر من(P < 0.05). لم يتم تسجيل تظهر إمكانية جيدة لتخفيف إنتاج نأ هنا المدروسة الثالثة األنواع نأش من(. p> 0.05البر وتوزوا )على البكتيريا المنتجة للميثان وأي تأثير لألنواع الثالثة .مرغوب فيه على معظم العوامل التخمريةيثان في الكرش بدون أي تأثير غيرالم http://crbt.dz/ NUTRIENT CONTENT, IN VITRO RUMINAL FERMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS 11 الكرش.،البر وتوزوا، الميثان ،إنتاج الغاز ،البكتيريا المنتجة للميثان، ةالعائلة المركب: الكلمات المفتاحية 1. Introduction ivestock farming is one of the largest sources of methane emission within the agriculture sector, which accounted for 39% of the sector’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) output in 2011, with an increase from 5.0 Gt CO2 eq yr -1 in 2000 to 5.3 Gt CO2 eq yr -1 in 2011. In respect of this fact, and with global demands for milk and meat predicted to double by 2050, global agricultural emissions are expected to increase by 18% and 30% in 2030 and 2050 respectively respectively [1]. Methane (CH4) emission from enteric fermentation is not only an important GHG associated with environmental problems, but it is also an energetically (2-15% of ingested gross energy) wasteful process. Therefore, reduction in methane emission from ruminants enhances the efficiency of nutrient utilization and the animals’ performance, and reduces the impact of CH4 on global warming and atmospheric pressure. The Asteraceae family is one of the largest families of flowering plants, consisting of approximately 1,600 to 1700 genera and over 24,000 species. Despite the global distribution of Asteraceae plants and their potential use as sources of antimicrobial agents [2], their effect as ruminal antimethanogenic agents is very little investigated. In this context, the present study was conducted to determine the in vitro fermentation characteristics and to test the antimethanogenic action of three plants belonging to the Asteraceae family: Chamaemelum nobile, Chrysanthemum segetum and Centaurea Pulata. These species were selected for their wide variety of medicinal properties (including antibacterial and anti-inflammatory applications), for their prevalent consumption by grazing small ruminants and for their abundance in wild and cultivated habitats in eastern Algeria. Their antimethanogenic activity was evaluated by the survey of in vitro methane production, and by methane-forming Archaea and protozoa enumeration by QRT-PCR. 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Sample collection and preparation The aerial parts of Chamaemelum nobile (CN), Chrysanthemum segetum (CS) and Centaurea Pulata (CP) (commonly named, Roman chamomile, Golden daisy and black knapweed, respectively) were harvested between March and June 2012 from a wild population in Ibn Ziad, located in the north-west of Constantine, Algeria (36°22'45'' latitude, 6°28'19'' longitude). The samples were washed, air dried in an open area and ground to pass through a 1-mm sieve in a Wiley mill (Brabender OHG Duisburg, Germany). The powder was stored in closed jars for chemical analysis and in vitro incubation. 2.2 Chemical analysis Dry matter (DM; method 934.01), ash (ID 942.05) and ether extract (EE; method 920.39C) were determined using AOAC procedures [3]. Nitrogen (N) was determined according to the Kjeldahl method (crude protein CP was calculated as N × 6.25). NDF, ADF and ADL were determined according to the methods of Van Soest et al., [4] (Ankom 200 Technology, Fairport, New York, USA). Hemicelluloses (HC) and cellulose (C) were calculated as NDF – ADF, and ADF – ADL, respectively. Proximate analysis of the control (50% alfalfa hay, 20% ryegrass hay and 30% corn) was also done under the same conditions. All measurements were carried out in triplicate and were presented as the average of three analyses ± standard deviation. 2.3 In vitro rumen fermentation The nutritive value and antimethanogenic potential of the three plants were examined in short term batch incubations using the in vitro gas production technique (IVGPT). The trials were conducted in serum bottles (120 ml capacity). Rumen liquor was collected manually from three cows (MW= ± 680 kg) maintained on a standard diet (grass hay: concentrate mixture; 50:50) prior to the morning feeding. The collected inocula were immediately transported to the laboratory in pre-warmed and pre-CO2-N2 flushed Thermos flasks, where it was strained through muslin cloth and mixed with a buffer medium in the ratio of 1:2 (V/V) as described by Menke and Steingass [5]. 30 ml of the incubation medium was distributed into each serum bottles containing approximately 200 mg of each plant under a continuous flow of CO2 to avoid oxygen contamination and maintain anaerobic conditions. The sealed serum bottles were incubated at 39 ± 0.5 °C for 24h in an orbital incubator (STUART, S1500, UK). Under the same conditions, three bottles containing only a buffer-inoculum mixture served as a blank and three flasks containing buffer-inoculum mixture and control diet served as a control. 2.4 Fermentation parameters Gas pressure accumulated in the headspace of each bottle was recorded, following the reading pressure technique (RPT) as described by Theodorou et al., [6], using a manual pressure transducer (Cole and Parmer Instrument Co, Illinois, USA). Total volume of gas (related to incubated organic matter, ml/g) was corrected by subtracting total gas produced in the blank from total gas produced by the tested flasks. Methane concentration was estimated using a gas chromatograph (GC-17 A, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a Porapack Q column (80/100mesh), TCD (Thermal L AMOKRANE SERINE ET AL 12 Conductivity Detector) and FID (Flame Ionization Detector) using a certified gas standard mixture of 50% CH4 and 50% CO2. Gas and methane production were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24h post-inoculation. After 24h of incubation, the pH of each media culture was recorded (Hanna Instruments, Inc., Woonsocket, RT, USA). Individual volatile fatty acids were determined by gas chromatography equipped with packed 15% SP-1220/1% H3PO4 on a 100/120 column. 1ml from each bottle was mixed with 1ml oxalic acid (0.06 M), mixed uniformly then centrifuged (at 12,000 g and 4 °C for 10 min). Supernatant was collected into appropriate GC vials for VFA analysis. The ammonia was determined by the Kjeldahl procedure. For determination of digestibility, the incubation content of each flask was filtered through pre-weighed sintered glass crucibles (Schott Duran, Mainz, Germany, porosity # 2) under vacuum. The residues were dried (105 °C for 24h), ashed (550 °C over night) and reweighed. The weight difference between incubated OM and the undegraded residue represents the true organic matter digestibility (IVOMD, %). The partitioning factor (PF) and microbial biomass yield (MBY) were calculated according to Makkar [7] and Blûmmel et al., [8] equations. The relative (R) antimethanogenic effect was evaluated as mentionned by López et al., [9]. 2.5 Quantitative Real Time PCR for methanogens and protozoa quantification Total rumen genomic DNA was extracted from fermentation liquor using the Fast DNA Spin Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, 1.5 ml aliquot taken from each serum bottle was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min and the supernatant was removed before DNA extraction. Total microbial DNA isolated in duplicate was purified using the silica-based spin TM filter method, and stored at -20 °C until the analysis. Nucleic acid concentration was measured by spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000c, Thermo Scientific, German) and evaluated by separating 2 μl of each sample on agarose gel in 1x Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer (0.8%, W/V). The primer sets for total bacteria were the following: Forward: 5′- GTGSTGCAYGGYTGTCGTCA-3′ and R: 5′-ACGTCRTCCMCACCTTCCTC-3′ [10]. The primer sets for quantification of methanogenic Archaea were targeted against the methyl coenzyme-M reductase (mcrA) gene: Forward: 5’-TTCGGTGGATCDCARAGRGC-3’ was designed to target the conserved amino acid sequence FGGSQR, while the reverse primer 5’-GBARGTCGWAWCCGTAGAATCC-3’ targeted the GFYGYDL conserved amino acid sequence [11]. Assays were set up using the SYBR ® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 300 nM forward and reverse primers, DNA template (100 ng), and water to 25 µl, under the following conditions: one cycle of 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 2 min for initial denaturation, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 1 min for primer annealing and product elongation. The relative quantification of methanogenic Archaea was expressed as a proportion of total rumen bacterial 16S rDNA according to the equation of Denman and McSweeney [12]: Relative quantification = 2 -(Ct target - Ct total bacteria) . For ciliate Protozoa enumeration, the primers were targeted against 18S rDNA gene: F: 5’- GAGCTAATACATGCTAAGGC-3’and R: 5’CCTCACTACAATCGAGATTTAAGG-3’ [13]. 1.2 μl of DNA template was used in 30μl, which included 15 μl of SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems),) and 400 nM of each primer. Cycling conditions were: 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 8 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 secondes, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30s, with a final step of 72 °C for 5 min [14]. The qPCR assays were performed on a 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Each qPCR was done in triplicate. A negative control without the template DNA was used in every qPCR assay. 3. Statistical analysis The data were analyzed using one way ANOVA in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 17.0.0.3, 2009). The minimum significant difference was generated from Tukey’s test as the basis of the multiple comparisons among means. The magnitude of correlation between variables was done using Pearson’s multiple comparison tests. 4. Results and discussion 4.1 Chemical composition of the Asteraceae species and control The proximate analysis of the three species and the control are reported in Table 1. The main constituents of the three tested plants are structural carbohydrates (between 234 and 470 g/kg DM) and nonfibrous carbohydrates (ranging from 282 to 500.9 g/kg DM). The three species are also characterised by their high ash content (between 108 and 139 g/kg DM). According to Guimaràtes et al., [15], carbohydrates were the most abundant macronutrients followed by crude protein in C. nobile, and fructose was the most abundant sugar, followed by glucose and sucrose. The crude protein (CP) content varied between the species samples, being particularly high for C. pulata (101 g/kg DM) and C. nobile (94.8 g/kg DM) comparatively to C. segetum (50.5 g/kg DM), which could give them wide nutritional benefits to supplement poor quality nitrogen deficient feedstuffs nitrogen-poor feedstuffs. Regarding lipid content, C. pulata and C. segetum showed half the oil content (47.9 and 49.3 g/kg DM, respectively) compared to C. nobile (84.1 g/kg DM). Furthermore, the analysis of insoluble dietary fibre content (cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin) showed that cellulose was the most abundant fraction (373, 239 and 192 g/kg DM for C. segetum, C. nobile and C.pulata, respectively), whereas lignin was less abundant fraction, being two times superior for C. nobile (80 g/kg DM) than for NUTRIENT CONTENT, IN VITRO RUMINAL FERMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS 13 C. segetum and C. pulata (49 and 36.7 g/kg DM, respectively). Chang et al., [16] reported similar data for lignin content but a much lower content of cellulose (101 g/kg DM) in Chrysanthemum coronarim (42 g/kg DM). However, our results were not far from those reported for similar species, other Asteraceae species and other Mediterranean shrubs [15, 17, 18]. The differences observed between authors were probably due to the geographical location, season, and maturity stage of plants sampled. Table 1. Chemical composition (g kg -1 DM) of the Asteraceae species and control diet (Means ± SD). Substrates Control diet C. pulata C. nobile C. segetum DM 908 ± 0.57 936 ± 0.14 939 ± 5.23 932 ± 0.71 Ash 60.9 ± 0.28 115 ± 1.56 139 ± 3.82 108 ± 2.55 CP 90.5 ± 0.14 101 ± 0.21 94.8 ±0.21 50.5 ± 3.54 EE 17.9 ± 0.22 47.9 ± 1.20 84.1 ± 1.70 49.3 ± 0.92 NDF 426 ± 0.71 234 ± 0.07 399 ± 5.59 470 ± 5.09 ADF 329 ± 0.35 229 ± 5.59 319 ± 7.28 422 ± 0.64 ADL 61.6 ± 0.21 36.7 ± 2.69 80 ± 1.20 49 ± 2.69 Cellulose (C) 267 ± 0.71 192 ± 2.90 239 ± 6.08 373 ± 2.05 Hemicelluloses (HC) 97.5 ± 0.49 5.3 ± 5.66 79.8 ± 12.8 47.2 ± 5.73 NFC 404 ± 0.57 500.9 ± 0.07 282 ± 3.68 321 ± 10.2 DM= dry matter, CP= crude protein, EE= ether extract, NDF=Neutral detergent fiber, ADF= Acid detergent fiber, ADL=Acid detergent lignin, NFC= Non Fibrous Carbohydrates: [100 – (% NDF + % CP + % EE + % Ash)]. 4.2 In vitro gas and methane productions, and true digestibility of the Asteraceae species In addition to the broader potential of using plants as feed additives in rumen nutrition illustrated by the accomplishment of the FC Framework 5 project “Rumen up”, several screening assays have been reported in literature, where a large number of plant species (more than 500 species) have been examined in in vitro batch cultures to study their potential to enhance the fermentation pathway and decrease methanogenesis. For instance, García-González et al., [19] have examined more than 150 herbs and species for their potential to enhance ruminal fermentation and decrease CH4 production; these authors identified Rheum officinale (rhizomes and roots), Frangula alnus (bark) and Allium sativum (bulb) as the most efficient in decreasing methanogenesis (more than 20%). In another experiment, the same authors examined Frangula alnus and Rheum officinale in a rumen-simulating fermenter (Rusitec). They concluded that the milled rhizomes of Rheum spp. were the most effective in methane abatement without any notable effect on rumen fermentation pattern. Similarly, Durmic et al., [20] assessed 128 Australian woody perennial plants for their potential to enhance fermentation pathways in the rumen, and reported that CH4 production was reduced with the plant species Cullen australasicum, Enchy-laena tomentosa, Eremophila longifolia, Maireana astrotricha and Templetonia retusa. This favourable effect has been attributed as most likely due to the presence of plant secondary metabolites. In our experiment, the three plants species were chosen because Chrysanthemum segetum and Centaurea pulata have not been yet investigated regarding their effect on ruminal fermentation pattern and methanogenesis, while a few reports have examined Chamaemelum nobile as an additive to reduce methane production in vitro. Cumulative gas production (CGP), recorded for the three species after 24h of incubation, was not significantly affected, compared to the control (P > 0.05, tab.2). A low gas production was recorded for C. segetum (108 ml/g IOM) and a high one was noted for C. pulata (118.1 ml/g IOM). This latter species stimulates methane production. However, C. segetum and C. nobile produced less methane than the control (P < 1% ; 30.1 and 31.1 ml/g IOM, respectively). Methane concentration in the gas was decreased by greater than 20% when incubating C. nobile and C. segetum in vitro in a ruminal fluid buffer mixture. This reduction was -24.3% and -27.1% for C. nobile and C. segetum, respectively. In the case of these two species, methane represented approximately 27% of the gas pool. Furthermore, its production for C. pulata was 8 units higher than C. nobile and C. segetum. The same results were reported by Kulivand and Kafilzadeh [17]. These authors have studied eight different grasses collected from Kermanshah (Iran) for their chemical composition, kinetic parameters and antimethanogenic effect and have remarked that Chamaemelum nobile is the best grass in terms of nutritive value and antimethanogenic effect (more than 20%). However, our results are inconsistent with those obtained by Garcia-Gonzalez et al., [19], who did not observe any noticeable effect of Chamaemelum nobile flowers on in vitro methane production and other fermentation parameters. The reasons for such inconsistencies are not clear, but we hypothesize that the effect of the phenolic compounds contained in plants prevails over that of the fibre content. Therefore, CH4 production was affected due to the effect of these active plant compounds on the metabolic process involved in methanogenesis, either by reducing available metabolic H2 and redirecting it to other sinks and thus limiting the substrate supply for methanogenesis, or by directly inhibiting the enzymes of microbes associated with methanogenesis. AMOKRANE SERINE ET AL 14 Table 2. In vitro gas and methane productions and true organic matter digestibility of the three species and control. Substrates Control C. pulata C. nobile C. segetum S.E.M Prob. OMCV ( mmol/g IOM) 5.17 a ± 0.08 5.27 a ± 0.19 5.04 a ± 0.22 4.85 a ± 0.51 0.06 0.13 OMCV (ml/g IOM) 116 a ±1.99 118.1 a ±4.35 113.1 a ±5.09 108 a ±11.5 1.47 0.13 CH4 (mmol/g IOM) 1.85 b ± 0.10 1.87 b ± 0.05 1.38 a ± 0.17 1.34 a ± 0.11 0.05 ˂ 0.0001 CH4 (ml/g IOM) 41.4 b ± 2.28 42 b ± 1.20 31.1 a ± 3.83 30.1 a ± 2.55 1.26 ˂ 0.0001 CH4 (mmol/mmol gas) 35.7 b ± 2.40 35.6 b ± 1.87 27.6 a ± 3.94 27. 8 a ± 2.75 0.99 ˂ 0.0001 Rˊ (%) - 1.74 b ± 6.38 -24.3 b ± 12.3 -27.1 a ±6.91 3.74 ˂ 0.0001 IVOMD (%) 44.3 ab ± 0.80 48.1 b ± 1.64 42.8 a ± 5.43 41.7 a ± 3.89 0.02 ˂ 0.0001 PF (mg/ml) 4.89 c ± 0.13 4.42 b ± 0.11 4.07 a ± 0.19 4.48 b ± 0.11 0.07 ˂ 0.0001 MBY (mg) 244.5 ab ± 6.94 257 c ± 11.64 206.5 a ± 8.72 226 b ± 6.90 0.01 OMCV = cumulative gas production related to incubated organic matter, CH4= methane related to incubated OM, IVOMD = in vitro true organic matter digestibility, R’= effect of plant on methane production, PF = partitioning factor, MBY = microbial biomass yield, S.E.M.= standard errors of means, Prob.= probability. Means with different superscripts within the same line being significantly different (P < 0.05). The nature, activity and concentration of these secondary moieties have been reported to influence the antimethanogenic activity of various plants additives differently [7, 21, 22]. Thus, the reduction in methane production for C. nobile and C. segetum is probably due to the use of the accumulated hydrogen by another metabolic pathway. In this case, it is probably the propionate production pathway because the concentration of this fatty acid is high for both species compared to the control (25.7 and 31.7%, respectively). Very limited data are available on the effect of C. segetum, C. nobile and C. pulata phytochemical compounds on rumen fermentation and methanogenesis, Amokrane et al., [23] reported the presence of substantial amounts of polyphenols in C. segetum and C. nobile extracts (207.3 and 99.4 g/kg DM, respectively), represented mainly by flavonoids, followed by condensed tannins. Hence, this information could indicate that flavonoids contained in the two species may be responsible for the decrease of methane production observed in vitro in our study. The sesquiterpenelactones and flavonoids are the major constituents of Centaurea species [24]. The compound or combination of compounds responsible for these effects should be identified using advanced chemical tools to confirm this hypothesis. C. pulata produced the highest cumulative gas and was also characterized by its high IVOMD (48.1%) compared to the control (44.3%) and the two other species (p <1%, tab. 2). This indicates that this species is highly fermentable. In addition, this species stimulates ruminal microbiota growth because the microbial biomass yield (MBY) was also significantly increased compared to the control (5.1%) and to the other species (19.7% and 12% for C. nobile and C. segetum, respectively). Despite the PF at 24h of the tested plant significantly decreased as compared to the control, it remained in the theoretical range (2.75 and 4.41) reported by Blümmel et al., [8] for a good microbial synthesis. It is widely recognized that feedstuffs with higher gas production and IVDMD tend to have higher CH4 production per gram DM incubated [25]. In our study, the higher CH4 production with C.pulata was not expected as its high soluble carbohydrate content (500.9 g/kg DM) suggests the promotion of propionate production. Our results were inconsistent with those of Chaves et al., [26] who indicated in their study that diet quality affected CH4 production in an in vitro study where low concentrations of non-fibrous carbohydrates in both legumes and grasses contributed to a low IVDMD and consequently high CH4 production per gram digested DM. Hence, a positive correlation between NFC concentrations and CH4 production was observed (0.796, P ˂ 0.05, results not presented). However, no correlation was registered between NDF content and CH4 production (-0.513, P ˂ 0.05). As speculated above, the presence of secondary metabolites would likely be responsible for these discrepancies. Due to its nutritional particularity (especially high CP and ash content) and its high digestibility, C. pulata could have a complementary role for animal feeding and grazing. 4.3 In vitro fermentation parameters and Archaea bacteria and protozoa quantification of the three species and the control Ammonia production and acetate to propionate ratio were similar for C. nobile and C. segetum (p > 0.05). For both parameters, the highest values were recorded for C. pulata (p <1%, tab.3). The same table shows that C. pulata has the highest concentration of total VFA (5.15 mmol./g OM) compared to the control (5.04 mmol./g OM), C. nobile (4.85 mmol./g OM) and C. segetum (4.76 mmol./g OM) although a significant slight decrease in pH was registered for C. pulata. The values are in the optimum range for methane production (7.0-7.2), gas production (6.6-7.6) and all rumen microbiota development [27]. Although there was no significant effect of the three species on methanogenic Archaea bacteria and protozoa (tab. 3, P > 0.05), the methanogenesis (methane production) declined for C. nobile and C. segetum. In our study no correlation was observed between methane production and methanogens count. However, methane production and the number of protozoa were strongly correlated (0.566, P ˂ 0.01). Kamra et al., [21] have confirmed that in the presence of 5 mM of bromoethanesulphonic acid (BES), methanogenesis was completely NUTRIENT CONTENT, IN VITRO RUMINAL FERMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS 15 inhibited while the number of methanogens assessed by real time PCR was not affected. In addition, Zhou et al., [28] have reported using PCR-DGGE analysis that the activity of individual species rather than the total number of methanogens has the greatest effect on CH4 production. Table 3. In vitro fermentation parameters recorded after 24h of incubation (pH, volatile fatty acids and ammonia productions) of the Asteraceae species and control. Substrates Control C. pulata C. nobile C. segetum S.E.M Prob. In vitro fermentation parameters pH 7.08 b ± 0.01 6.98 a ± 0.06 7.07 b ± 0.07 7.06 ab ± 0.02 0.02 0.01 N-NH3 (mg/l) 14.6 b ± 0.40 14.8 b ± 0.73 13 a ± 0.88 12.9 a ± 0.87 0.23 ˂ 0.0001 VFAt (mmol/g OM) 5.04 ab ± 0.05 5.15 b ± 0.09 4.85 ab ± 0.32 4.76 a ± 0.24 0.05 0.01 Acetate (mmol.) 3.09 ab ± 0.10 3.34 c ± 0.12 2.51 a ± 0.69 2.59 a ± 0.37 0.10 0.005 Propionate (mmol.) 1.01 a ±0.06 1.04 a ± 0.03 1.33 b ± 0.21 1.27 b ± 0.08 0.03 ˂ 0.0001 Butyrate (mmol.) 0.53 a ± 0.09 0.61 a ± 0.06 0.61 a ± 0.05 0.64 a ± 0.08 0.16 0.14 A : P ratio 3.05 b ± 0.26 3.20 b ± 0.21 2.04 a ± 0.23 1.91 a ± 0.19 0.14 ˂ 0.0001 Archaea bacteria and protozoa quantification Archaea bacteria (× 10 5 cell/ml) 8.47 a 7.51 a 7.59 a 9.03 a 0.247 Ciliate protozoa (× 10 3 cell/ml) 3.85 a 4.10 a 3.11 a 3.32 a 0.054 VFA = total volatile fatty acids, NH3 = ammonia production, A: P = acetate and propionate ratio, S.E.M. = standard error of the mean, Prob. = probability, means with different superscripts within the same line being significantly different (P < 0.05). 5. Conclusion This is the first report on the effect of C. pulata and C.segetum species on ruminal fermentation pattern and CH4 production in vitro. In addition to its nutritional diversity, C.pulata behaved similarly to the control; thus, it could have a supplementary role for animal feeding and grazing. C.nobile and C.segetum were able to successfully modulate rumen fermentation characteristics, and offer potential as antimethanogenic agents without compromising forage digestibility. Consequently pasturing of these two species may be a potent strategy to decrease CH4 emissions in Algeria. The discrepancy encountered between chemical composition and methane production from in vitro trials suggests further assessment of these species regarding their secondary metabolites contents, although, in most studies, the specific PSM responsible for their effects on CH4 have not been identified. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Acknowledgment The authors acknowledge CRBt and DMPVA for financial support. References 1. Tubiello, F.N., Salvatore, M., Condor Golec, R.D., Ferrara, A., Rossi, S. and Biancalani, R. Agriculture, Forestery and Other Land Use: Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks-1990-2011. Analysis. Rapport FAO, ESS working paper N°2, 2014. 2. Kenny, O., Smyth, T.J., Walsh, D., Kelleher, C.T., Hewage, C.M. and Brunton, N.P. Investigating the potential of under-utilised plants from the Asteraceae family as a source of natural antimicrobial and antioxidant extracts. Food Chemistry., 2014, 161, 79-86. 3. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. (15th Edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, 1990. 4. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Non starch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10), 3583-3597. 5. Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H . Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development, 1988, 28, 7-55. AMOKRANE SERINE ET AL 16 6. Theodorou, M.K., Williams, B.A., Dhanoa, M.S., Mcallan, A.B. and France, J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology., 1997, 48, 185-197. 7. Makkar, HPS. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research., 2003, 49, 241-256. 8. Blümmel, M., Makkar, HPS. and Becker, K. In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition., 1997, 77, 24-34. 9. López, S., Makkar, HPS. and Soliva, C.R. Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In In Vitro Screening of Plant Resources for Extra-Nutritional Attributes in Ruminants: Nuclear and Related Methodologies. Vercoe, P.E., Makkar, HPS., Schlink, A.C. and Dordrecht, 2010. 10. Maeda, H., Fujimoto, C. and Haruki, Y. Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology., 2003, 39, 81-86. 11. Denman, S.E., Tomkins, N.W. and McSweeney, C.S. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiology Ecology., 2007, 62, 313-322. 12. Denman, S.E. and McSweeney, C.S. Quantitative (Real Time) PCR. InMethods in Gut Microbial Ecology for Ruminants, H. Makkar, H. and McSweeney, C.S. and New York, 2005. 13. Skillman, L.C.I., Toovey, A.F., Williams, A.J. and Wright, A.D. Development and validation of a real-time PCR method to quantify rumen protozoa and examination of variability between Entodinium populations in sheep offered a hay-based diet. Applied and Environmental Microbiology., 2006, 72(1), 200-6. 14. Hook, S.E., Steele, M.A., Northwood, K.S., Wright, A.D.G. and McBride, B.W. Impact of High-Concentrate Feeding and Low Ruminal pH on Methanogens and Protozoa in the Rumen of Dairy Cows. Microbial Ecology., 2011, 62, 94-105. 15. Guimaràtes, R., Barros, L. and Dueñas, M. Nutrients, phytochemicals and bioactivity of wild Roman chamomile: A comparison between the herb and its preparations. Food Chemistry., 2013, 136, 718-725. 16. Chang, S.C., Lee, M.S., Li, C.H. and Chen, M.H. Dietary fibre content and composition of vegetables in Taiwan area. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1995, 4, 204-210. 17. Kulivand, M. and Kafilzadeh, F. Correlation between chemical composition, kinetics of fermentation and methane production of eight pasture grasses. Acta scientiarum. Animal Sciences., 2015, 37(1), 9-14. 18. Arhab, R., Macheboeuf, D., Aggoun, M., Bousseboua, H., Viala, D. and Besle, J.M. Effect of polyethylene glycol on in vitro gas production and digestibility of tannin containing feedstuffs from North African arid zone. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems., 2009, 10(3), 475-486. 19. Garcia-Gonzalez, R., López, S., Fernandez, M., Bodas, R. and Gonzalez, J.S. Screening the activity of plants and spices for decreasing ruminal methane production in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008, 147, 36- 52. 20. Durmic, Z., Hutton, P., Revell., D.K., Emms, J., Hughes, S. and Vercoe, P.E. In vitro fermentative traits of Australian woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology., 2010, 160, 98-109. 21. Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N. and Chaudhary, L.C .Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds. International Congress Series. 2006, 1293, 156-163. 22. Ungerfield, E.M. Shifts in metabolic hydrogen sinks in the methanogenesis- inhibited ruminal fermentation, Frontiers in Microbiology., 2015, 6(37). 23. Amokrane, S., Arhab, R., Tudisco, R., Rahab, H., Infascelli, F. and Calabro, S .Effect of Chamaemelum nobile and Chrysanthemum segetum extracts on ruminal methanogenesis, in vitro degradability and methane forming population. International Journal of Advanced Research., 4, 141-154 24. Khammar, A. and Djeddi S. Pharmacological and Biological Properties of some Centaurea Species. European Journal of Scientific Research., 2012, 84(3), 398-416. 25. Jayanegara, A., Wina, E., Soliva, C.R., Marquardt, S., Kreuzer, M. and Leiber, F. Dependence of forage quality and methanogenic potential of tropical plants on their phenolic fractions as determined by principal component analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology., 2011, 16, 231-2430. 26. Chaves, A.V., Thompson, L.C. and Iwaasa, A.D. Effect of pasture type (alfalfa vs. grass) on methane and carbon dioxide production by yearling beef heifers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science., 2006, 86(3), 409-418. 27. Stewart, C.S. and Bryant, M.P. The rumen bacteria. In The rumen microbial ecosystem. P.N. Hobson and New York, 1988. 28. Zhou, Z., Meng, O. and Yu, Z. Effects of Methanogenic Inhibitors on Methane Production and Abundances of Methanogens and Cellulolytic Bacteria in In Vitro Ruminal Cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(8), 2634-2639. Received 20 February 2019 Accepted 5 December 2019 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840110002282 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840110002282 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840110002282