Clinical profile of Stroke: The experience at King Abdulaziz University Hospital 35 ABSTRACT. Objectives : To determine the pattern and risk factors of stroke in Saudi nationals and non-Saudis, at King Abdulaziz Uni- versity Hospital (KAUH), in the western province of Saudi Arabia. Method: All cases of stroke admitted to KAUH in the period between January 1995 and December 1999 were studied. Demographic data of the patients, stroke types, risk factors and mortality were reported. Results : Of the 103 patients studied, 56% were Saudis and 44 % non-Saudis with male predominance and mean ages of 66 and 62 years respectively. In Saudis, the stroke types were 74% ischemic, 10% hemorrhagic and 16% unspecifi ed, whereas in non-Saudis, the fi gures were respectively 62% , 29% and 9% . The frequency of stroke increased steadily with age in Saudis but dropped after the sixth decade in non- Saudis. There was no signifi cant difference between the Saudis and the non-Saudis in the occurrence of risk factors for stroke or in mortality. Conclusion: The pattern and risk factors of cases of stroke treated at KAUH are similar to those reported from other regions of Saudi Arabia and other parts of the world. Key words : stroke, risk factors, Saudis, non- Saudis S troke is one of the leading causes of death, long-term disability, and hospital admission in the industrialized world.1 The loss of the affected indivi- duals from work force and the extended hospitalisation they require during recovery make the economic impact of the disease among the most devastating. In Sweden, the preva- lence of home-bound stroke victims with residual dysfunc- tions after an average 95.2 days’ hospitalisation has been estimated at 0.74 per 1000.2 Studies in USA suggest an annual cost of at least $ 30–40 billion.3,4 The frequency of different types of stroke, their risk factors and incidence rates vary in different regions of the world.5–11 There are several reports on the pattern and risk factors of stroke in the middle and eastern provinces of Saudi Arabia.9,12–15 We report our experience regarding Saudi nationals and non- Saudis at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (K AUH ) in the western province of Saudi Arabia. M E T H O D K AU H is a teaching hospital with a capacity of 400 beds. The medical charts of all patients admitted to this hospital with a diagnosis of stroke from January 1995 to December 1999 were reviewed. Stroke was defi ned as per the World squ journal for scientific research: Medical Sciences 2001, 1, 35–38 ©sultan qaboos university Clinical profi le of stroke: The experience at King Abdulaziz University Hospital *Daad H. Akbar, Maimona Mushtaq Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah 21415, P.O Box 18298 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. .E-mail: daadakb@yahoo.com a k b a r & m u s h t a q36 Health Organization (WHO )’s defi nition: Rapidly devel- oping clinical signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than vascular origin.16 Findings of brain computerized tomography (CT) scan per- formed within one week of the onset of stroke were used for classifi cation of the type of stroke. Cerebral infarction was diagnosed based on typical CT scan fi ndings of infarct or a normal CT scan when it was performed within two days of the onset of stroke, or the presence of a potential source of cerebral emboli such as the heart or carotid artery rel- evant to the side of the stroke. Patients with cerebral infarc- tion were further classifi ed into lacunar infarct (defi ned as infarct measuring up to 1.5 cm on CT scan of the brain) and non-lacunar infarct (defi ned as infarct measuring >1.5 cm on CT scan of the brain). Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH ) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH ) was diagnosed based on clinical and CT scan fi ndings. Where none of these cri- teria were fulfi lled, the cause was classifi ed as unspecifi ed type of stroke. In addition to the fi ndings on neurological evaluation at the time of admission, results of clinical and investigative fi ndings of cardiovascular systems were also analysed. Patient’s age, sex, nationality, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM ) (defi ned according to the W HO criteria),17 hypertension (defi ned as systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg and /or diastolic blood pressure >95 mmHg at the time of admission and persisted even after that during the hospital stay or if the patient is already known hypertensive), hyperlipidemia (defi ned as total cholesterol >5.2mmol/l, triglyceride >2.3 mmol/l, HDL <0.9 mmol/l, LDL >3.4 mmol/l), history of smoking were recorded as well as history of transient ischemic attacks (TI A), presence of aphasia, loss of consciousness, recurrent stroke, presence of bilateral stroke, stroke in evolution, use of mechanical ventilation and mortality. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 7.5 software. A two-tailed student’s t-test and chi-square (χ2) were used as appropriate. p <0.05 was considered signifi cant. R E S U L T S A total of 103 patients were studied, out of which 58 (56%) were Saudis and 45 (44%) non-Saudis with a male:female ratio of 1.4:1 versus 1.6:1 and mean age of 65.8 ± 12.6 years versus 61.75 ± 14.75 years (p 0.7 and 0.1 respectively). In Saudis, ischemic stroke constituted the majority of cases, 43/58 (74%), [14/43 (33%) lacunar infarct and 29 /43 (67%) non-lacunar infarct], while hemorrhagic stroke were reported in 6/58 (10%) and unspecifi ed in 9/58 (16%). In non-Saudis ischemic stroke constituted 28/45 (62%), [4/28 (14%) lacunar infarct and 24/28 (86%) non-lacunar infarct], hemorrhagic stroke 13/45 (29%), [10/13 (77%) ICH and 3/13 (23%) SAH ], and unspecifi ed in 4/45 (9%). Hemorrhagic stroke was encountered more often in non- Saudis (p 0.03). The incidence of stroke – both ischemic and hemorrhagic – increased progressively after the age of 45 in Saudis, while in non-Saudis ischemic stroke was mainly in the age group 45–65 and hemorrhagic stroke increased with age [Table 1]. Risk factors for stroke such as hypertension, DM , hyperlipidemia and smoking were present in both Saudis and non-Saudis with no signifi cant Table1. Distribution of stroke type in Saudi and non- Saudi by age group Stroke type <45 Years 45-65 Years >65 Years Total ICH S NS 2 (20) 2 (33) 3 (30) 4 (67) 5 (50) 6 10 SAH S NS 2 (67) 1 (33) 3 LI S NS 1 (7) 7 (50) 4 (100) 6 (43) 14 4 NLI S NS 1 (3) 3 (13) 13 (45) 10 (42) 15 (52) 11 (46) 29 24 U S NS 1 (17) 5 (56) 2 (50) 4 (45) 1 (25) 9 4 ICH=intracerebral hemorrhage, SAH= subarachnoid hemorrhage, LI=lacunar infarct, NLI= non lacunar infarct, U=unspecified, S= Saudi, NS=non-Saudi Table2. Relation between risk factors, stroke type and nationality Stroke type Total* Nation- ality HBP DM HL Smoking ICH 6 10 S NS 4 (67) 5 (50) 1 (17) 2 (20) 3 (50) 1 (10) 1 (17) 4 (40) SAH 3 S NS 2 (67) 2 (67) 2 (67) LI 14 4 S NS 4 (29) 2 (50) 10 (71) 1 (25) 6 (43) 4 (100) 6 (43) 1 (25) NLI 29 24 S NS 15 (52) 15 (63) 12 (41) 14 (58) 7 (24) 9 (38) 15 (52) 8 (33) U 9 4 S NS 6 (67) 4 (100) 7 (78) 2 (50) 4 (44) 5 (56) 1 (25) * more than one risk factor in one patient ICH= intracerebral haemorrhage, SAH= subarachnoid haemorrhage, LI=lacunar infarct, NLI= non-lacunar infarct, U= unspecified, S=Saudi, NS= non-Saudi, HBP= hypertension, DM=diabetes mellitus, HL=hyperlipidemia c l i n i c a l p r o f i l e o f s t r o k e 37 difference between the two: 29/58 (50%), 30/58 (52%), 20/58 (35%), 27/58 (47%) in Saudis and 28/45 (62%), 21/45 (47%), 14/45 (31%), 16/45 (36%) in non-Saudis (p 0.2, 0.6, 0.7, 0.5 respectively). Hypercholesterolemia was the commonest type of hyperlipidemia found in our patients in both Saudis and non-Saudis. While 15/20 (75%) of the Saudis had isolated hypercholesterolemia, 3/20 (15%) had mixed hyperlipidemia and 2/20 (10%) had hypertriglyceri- demia, the corresponding fi gures for non-Saudis were 10/14 (71%), 3/14 (21%) and 1/14 (7%). As shown in Table 2, hypertension was the commonest risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in both Saudis and non- Saudis. Aphasia and loss of consciousness were reported more frequently in non-Saudis while there was no signifi - cant difference in the other stroke characteristics between Saudis and non-Saudis (Table 3). Parietal area and cerebel- lum were the areas most often involved in both Saudis and non-Saudis, 21/58 (36%) and 10/58 (17%) versus 14/45 (31%) and 21/45 (27%) (p 0.5, 0.3 respectively). Nine of 58 (16%) of the Saudis patients died versus 12/45 (28%) non- Saudis (p 0.16). D I S C U S S I O N Our results showed that stroke was more frequent in the sixth decade of life with male predominance in both Saudis and non-Saudis, a fi nding similar to what has been reported by others.9,10,12,14 Ischemic stroke had been reported to be more frequent than hemorrhagic stroke.10,18,19 It accounted for 74% of cases in Saudis while ICH was more frequent than SAH ; both were encountered more in non-Saudis, which is consistent with what had been reported from other regions of Saudi Arabia.12,14,15 The frequency of stroke increased steadily with age in Saudis and dropped after the sixth decade in non-Saudis, a fi nding in agreement with what had been reported by Al-rajeh et al.14 Reports from other parts of the world also show that frequency of stroke increases with age.10,19 We reported a mortality of 16% in Saudis, which is similar to that reported from Riyadh area9 and other parts of the world.19 Several risk factors for stroke have been identifi ed, including age, hypertension, DM , cigarette smoking and hyperlipidemia.20–22 The frequency of these risk factors is high in both Saudis and non-Saudis with hypertension being the commonest in both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Hypertension, including borderline hypertension, is probably the most important risk factor for stroke based on the degree of risk and prevalence as described by Sacco.23 Data from the Harvard Stroke Registry, the Stroke Data Bank, and the New England Medical Center Regis- tries indicate that multiple potential stroke aetiologies are frequent.24–26 Among the 407 patients in the New England Medical Center Registry, 20% had two, and 2% had three potential aetiologies for ischemia. The frequent coexistence of more than one and sometimes multiple potential risk fac- tors for stroke is an important factor. All patients who have evidence of potential risk factors for stroke deserve control and modifi cation of these factors when possible. The impor- tance of control of hypertension has to be stressed to the treating physicians. An overview of 14 treatment trials con- cluded that a long-term (mean fi ve years) 5 to 6 mmHg decrease in the usual diastolic blood pressure was associ- ated with 35-40% reduction in stroke incidence.27 Treat- ing hyperlipidemia with H MG coA reductase inhibitor has been described by Bucher to reduce the incidence of stroke.28 Several studies have reported that physical inacti- vity increases the risk of stroke and those who participate in leisure-time physical activity have a lower risk.29–32 C O N C L U S I O N This study reveals that the pattern of stroke and its risk factor profi le at K AUH , in the western province of Saudi Arabia, is similar to that reported from other regions of Saudi Arabia and other parts of the world. R E F E R E N C E S 1. Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet 1992, 339, 342–4. 2. de Pedro-Cuesta J, Sandstrom B, Holm M, Stawiarz L, Widen-Holmqvist L, Bach-y-Rita P. Stroke rehabilitation: identifi cation of target groups and planning data. Scand J Rehabil Med 1993, 25, 107–16. Table 3. Comparison between Saudis and non-Saudis in relation to some stroke characteristics Sign Saudi N=58 Non-Saudi N=45 P value Aphasia N (%) 19 (33) 22 (49) 0.09 Loss of conciousness N (%) 13 (22) 17 (38) 0.08 Rt. Hemiplegia N (%) 24 (41) 25 (56) 0.2 Bilateral Stroke N (%) 10 (17) 6 (13) 0.5 Recurrent stroke N (%) 16 (28) 8 (18) 0.2 Stroke in evolution N (%) 4 (7) 2 (4) 0.5 Transient ischemic attack N (%) 6 (10) 5 (11) 0.9 Mechanical ventilation N (%) 5 (9) 1 (2) 0.1 a k b a r & m u s h t a q38 3. Matchar DB, Duncan PW. Cost of stroke. Clin Update 1994, 5, 9–12. 4. Taylor TN, Davis PH, Tomer JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke 1996, 27,1459–66. 5. William GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samas GP. Inci- dence and occurrence of total (fi rst ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke 1999, 30, 2523–8. 6. Kurtzke JP, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of Neurological Diseases. In: Baker AB,Joynt RJ, Ed. Clinical Neurology, Vol 4, Philadelphia: Harper and Row, 1987. 7. Matsumoto N, Whisnant JP, Kurland LT, Okazaki H. Natural history of stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1955 through 1969: an extension of a previous study, 1945 through 1954. Stroke 1973, 4, 20–29. 8. Tanaka H, Ueda Y, Date C, Baba T, Yamashita H, Hayashi M et al. Incidence of stroke in Shibata, Japan: 1976–1978. Stroke 1981, 12, 460–6. 9. Al-Rajeh S, Awada A,Niazi G, Larbi E. Stroke in a Saudi Arabian National Guard community: analysis of 500 consecutive cases from a population-based hospital. Stroke 1993, 24, 1635–9. 10. Al Jishi AA, Mohan PK. Profi le of stroke in Bahrain. Saudi Med J 1999, 20, 958–62. 11. Jain S, Maheshwari MC. Cerebrovascular diseases: a review of the Indian experience in the last 35 years. Neuro- epidemiology 1986, 5, 1–16. 12. Awada A, Al-Rajeh S. The Saudi Data Bank. Analysis of the fi rst 1000 cases. Acta Neurol Scand 1999, 100, 265–9. 13. Yaqub BA, Shamena AR, Kolawole TM, Patel PJ. Cerebrovascular diseases Saudi Arabia. Stroke 1991, 22, 1173–6. 14. Al Rajeh S, Larbi E, Bademosi O, Awada A, Ismail H, Al Freihi H, Al Ghassab G. Stroke in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: a study of 372 cases. Eur Neurol 1991, 31, 251–6. 15. Al Rajeh S, Labri E, Bademosi O, Awada A, Ismail H, Al Freihi H. Pattern and ethnic variations in stroke in Saudi Arabia. J Neurol Sci 1991, 102, 112–8. 16. World Health Organization. Stroke 1989. Recommenda- tions on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on stroke and other cerebrovascu- lar disorders. Stroke 1989, 20, 1407–31. 17. World Health Organization. Diabetes mellitus: Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva. WHO Tech Rep S No.727 1985, 1–113. 18. Yatsu FM, Becker C, MacLeroy KR, Coull B, Feibel J, Howard G et al. Community hospital-based stroke pro- gram: North Carolina, Oregon, and New York. Stroke 1986, 17, 276–84. 19. Kita Y, Okayama A, Ueshima H, Wada H, Nozaki A, Choudhury SR. stroke incidence and case fatality in Shiga, Japan,1989-1993. Int J Epidemiol 1999, 28, 1059–65. 20. Marmot MG, Poulter NR. Primary prevention of stroke. Lancet 1992, 339, 344–7. 21. Neaton JD, Blackburn H, Jacobs D, Kuller L, Lee DJ, Sherwin R et al. Serum cholesterol level and mortality fi ndings for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Group. Arch Intern Med 1992, 152, 1490–500. 22. Reed D,Yano K,Kagan A. lipids and lipoproteins as pre- dictors of coronary heart disease, stroke, and cancer in the Honolulu Heart Program. Am J Med 1986, 80, 871–8. 23. Sacco RL,Wolf PA,Gorelick PB. Risk factors and their management for stroke prevention: outlook for 1999 and beyond. Neurology 1999, 53, 15–24. 24. Mohr JP, Caplan LR, Melski JW, Goldstein RJ, Duncan GW, Kistler JP et al. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Reg- istry: a prospective registry. Neurology 1978, 28, 754–62. 25. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Heir DB. The stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline charac- teristics. Stroke 1988, 19, 547–54. 26. Caplan LR. Posterior Circulation Disease: Clinical Find- ings, Diagnosis and Management. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Science publishers 1996, 179–97. 27. Collins R, Petro R, MacMahon S, Hebert P, Fiebach NH, Eberlein KA et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coro- nary heart disease. Part 2: short term reduction in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trial in their epide- miological contexr. Lancet 1990, 335, 827–38. 28. Bucher HC, Griffi th LE, Guyatt GH. Effect of HMGcoA reductase inhibitors on stroke. A meta analysis of rand- omized controlled trials. Annals Intern Med 1998, 128, 89–95. 29. Kieley DK, Wolf PA, Cupples LA, Beiser AS, Kannel WB. Physical activity and stroke risk: the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 1994, 140, 608–20. 30. Sacco RL, Gan R, Boden-Albala B, Lin IF, Kargman DE, Hauser WA et al. Leisure-time physical activity and ischemic stroke risk: the North Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1998, 29, 380–7. 31. Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr. physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. Stroke 1998, 29, 2049–54. 32. Agnarsson U, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. Effects of Leisure-time physical activity and ventilation function on risk of stroke in men: the Reykjavik Study. Annals Intern Med 1999, 130, 987–90.