December 2008 no white pages.indd Impact of Geographical Proximity on Health Care Seeking Behaviour in Northern Oman *Ahmed Al-Mandhari,1 Samir Al-Adawi,2 Ibrahim Al-Zakwani,3 Mohammed Al-Shafaee,1 Liyam Eloul4 1Departments of Family Medicine & Public Health and 2Behavioural Sciences, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman; 2Department of Pharmacy, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman; 4Stanford University, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: manar96@yahoo.com SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2008, VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, P. 310-318 SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY© SUBMITTED - 29TH APRIL 2008 ACCEPTED - 21ST JULY 2008 C L I N I C A L A N D B A S I C R E S E A R C H في الصحية للرعاية كسبب لسلوك اللجوء اجلغرافي القرب تأثير شمال عمان ليام الول محمد الشافعي، الزكواني، ابراهيم سمير العدوي، املنظري، أحمد القليل من القت ــة الصحي للرعاية ــي واللجوء اجلغراف بني القرب العالقة ــان ف ــة الصحية السياس على تأثيرها من على الرغم ــص: الهــدف: امللخ يلجأون الذين بني املرضى الصحية استخدام الرعاية وسلوك اجلغرافي القرب بني العالقة هذه الورقة إلى تقييم تهدف الطبية. األدبيات في االهتمام 428 ل ــخصية املقابلة الش طريق عن 2006-2007 وذلك ــنتي س خالل املعلومات جمع مت عمان. الطريقة: ــمال ش مناطق في الطبية ــارة لالستش القرب اجلغرافي بني العالقة حتليل مت عمان. شمال مبناطق اتلفة األولية الصحية الرعاية ملراكز املراجعني بني املرضى من عشوائيا اختيارهم مت مريضا القرب تفضيل أن ــات البيان أظهرت ــر. النتائج: املتغي متعددة حتوف االمداديات ــتخدام باس وذلك األخرى واملؤثرات ــة الصحي للرعاية ــوء للج ــبب كس جلسات التثقيف وحضور الشعبي للطب السابق ــتخدام واالس الزوجية باحلالة وثيقا ارتباطا مرتبط الصحية للرعاية اللجوء ــباب أس كأحد اجلغرافي الصحية للرعاية للجوء قويا سببا اجلغرافي القرب يظل حيث الدراسات السابقة تدعم البحث اخلالصة: نتائج في املاضي. التطعيم الصحي وإجراء الورقة. محتوى السلوك في ذلك على واالجتماعية النفسية العوامل تأثير مناقشة مت عمان. في عمان. سريرية ، دراسة عربي/إسالمي ، ، الصحية الرعاية استخدام ، الكلمات: القرب اجلغرافي مفتاح ABSTRACT Objectives: Despite its impact on health policy, the relationship between geographical proximity and health care seeking has received scant attention in the medical literature. This paper aims to evaluate the relationship between geographic proximity and health care usage behaviour among patients seeking medical consultation in the northern region of Oman. Methods: During 2006- 2007, data was collected via face-to-face interviews among 428 randomized patients seeking medical consultation in various primary health care centres in the northern region of Oman. The association between geographical proximity as a reason to seek health care and other predictors was also analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: The data suggest that preference for geographi- cal proximity as a reason for seeking health care is strongly associated with marital status, previous exposure to traditional medicine and health education, as well as history of immunisation. Conclusion: This finding supports the view from elsewhere that geographi- cal proximity remains a strong catalyst for care seeking in Oman. The psychosocial factors affecting care seeking are discussed. Keywords: Geographic proximity; Health care utilization; Arab/Islamic; Clinical-based study; Oman. Advances in Knowledge • The study shows that geographical proximity remains a strong catalyst for health care seeking in Oman. • Socio-cultural teaching appears to play a major part in what may appear to be a paradoxical and idiosyn- cratic relationship between geographical proximity and health care seeking behaviour. • The study stimulates the need to conduct further studies that look more closely at the issues of health care seeking behaviour, particularly in remote areas and with regard to the use of traditional medicine centres. I M PA C T O F FA C T O R S O N G E O G R A P H I C A L P R O X I M I T Y A S A R E A S O N O F H E A LT H C A R E S E E K I N G B E H AV I O U R I N N O R T H E R N O M A N 311 SINCE THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION launched ‘Health for All by Year 2000’, 1 many health planners in developing countries have expanded and diversified health care services in order to achieve viable health equity. However, one source of attrition around this endeavour is the lack of under- standing surrounding care seeking behaviour among health care consumers. An understanding of care seeking behaviour can act as a basis on which to lay the groundwork for developing strategies to improve awareness and to identify barriers to timely interven- tions and treatments. Attention to care seeking behav- iour would likely impact health care utilisation and, albeit indirectly, reduce the high maternal and infant mortality rates, as well as heightening the health indi- cators of a country. Various studies have converged on the view that the use of health care services is related to factors such as service accessibility and quality of service, beliefs underpinning avoidance of distress and in- dividual differences.2, 3, 4, 5 Although most of these studies have been derived from a variety of popula- tions, to our knowledge, few studies examine the fac- tors leading to health care seeking behaviour in Arab populations,6, 7 and their generalisation is often lim- ited to specific clinical populations.8, 9 This paper attempts to examine the factors asso- ciated with the utilisation of health care among gen- eral health care consumers in Oman, an Arab/Islamic country situated in the south-eastern corner of the Arabian Peninsula. Once observers labelled Oman the “Tibet of Arabia” or characterized it as a “beleaguered hermit kingdom”10 due to its isolation and mediaeval- like society; however, Oman has experienced rapid modernisation in the past few decades. The British Medical Journal has stated that, “Money from oil has brought Omanis progress through development in less than 20 years, development that took a thousand years in Europe”.11 Two of the major benefits of the re- cent modernisation in Oman are the major improve- ment in the standard of living, and the establishment of a modern health care delivery system. Hospital bed space grew from 12 beds in a single hospital in 1970 to 4,549 beds and more than 150 health centres in 2006. 11 With the improvements in health care, the country has experienced a significant decline in maternal and child mortality. Studies from other countries around the world are beginning to show that the use of health care servic- es is related to geographical proximity to health care centres.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Emerging views suggest that many clinical conditions and their outcomes often depend, among other things, on the geographical proximity of care facilities.17, 18 For example, in some emerging economies in many parts of the world, health care ac- cessibility is limited to urban areas,19 20 and therefore health inequity has been heightened simply due to an asymmetry in the availability of health care services reflecting an urban-rural disparity.21, 22 In some stud- ies, it has been reported that morbidity and mortality in a clinical population are invariably related to the ge- ographical proximity of the health care centres.23 Al- though the ability to access health care is influenced by myriad factors, the relationship between care seeking and distance travelled has not been widely reported in developing countries.24, 25 This is problematic when one bears in mind that in many developing countries there exists a drastic disparity in the availability of health care services between different geographical regions of the country. With the spread of universal free health care in Oman, the question remains: ‘How does geographic proximity contribute to care seeking and, by implication, health equity in the country?’ The recent rise in affluence in Oman has blurred the once-clear gap between rural and urban environ- ments, as social services and infrastructure develop- ments have spread equally to all regions of the country. 12 The United Nations Children’s Fund 26 has estimated that for the past several years 96 percent of the popu- lation of Oman has had access to health care services. The population density of Oman has been estimated at 8.3/km². The bulk of the population is located in the towns and villages adjacent to the capital, Muscat, and towns along the northern Batinah coast. The rest of the population is distributed throughout the southern and interior regions of the country. In a recent health Application to Patient Care • Some populations are sparsely distributed in many parts of a country, therefore health planners have been obliged to build health care services that can be accessed by all. This is particularly applicable to preventive services such as vaccination. A H M E D A L - M A N D H A R I , S A M I R A L - A D AW I , I B R A H I M A L - Z A K WA N I , M O H A M M E D A L -S H A FA E E A N D L I YA M E L O U L 312 system ranking, the WHO ranked Oman as the most “efficient” health care system in the world in terms of outcome.27 Therefore, given the quality of the health care services, and the geographical characteristics of the country, Oman, is an interesting ground to explore the influence of geographical proximity to health care centres on health care seeking behaviour. It is hypoth- esised that health care seeking behaviour is invariably Characteristic Short distance as a reason to seek healthcare p-value No (n=46) Yes (n=382) Age, mean ± SD, years 29±12 33±12 0.034 Gender, n (%) 0.399 Female 31 (67%) 233 (61%) Male 15 (33%) 149 (39%) Marital status, n (%) 0.001* Single, divorced, widowed 26 (57%) 121 (32%) Married 20 (43%) 261 (68%) Literacy, n (%) 0.539 Illiterate (cannot read or write) 6 (13%) 70 (18%) Literate (can read or write) 40 (87%) 312 (82%) Attended a health education program 0.035* No 37 (80%) 248 (65%) Yes 9 (20%) 134 (35%) History of chronic illness, n (%) 0.518 No 33 (72%) 256 (67%) Yes 13 (28%) 126 (33%) Takes regular medication, n (%) 0.533 No 30 (65%) 231 (60%) Yes 16 (35%) 151 (40%) Number of visits attended per month 0.253 Mean±SD 1.67±2.53 1.27±2.30 Median (absolute range) 1 (0 to 15) 1 (0 to 30) Reason to seek healthcare, n (%) 0.065 Treatment of acute condition 25 (54%) 142 (37%) Follow-up visit 12 (26%) 118 (31%) Vaccination or other 9 (20%) 122 (32%) Source of healthcare, n (%) 0.080 Government 34 (74%) 272 (71%) Private 7 (15%) 29 (8%) Traditional 5 (11%) 81 (21%) SD = Standard deviation. Percentages are column percents. p-values were generated using Student’s and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests, Pearson’s χ2 test, and Fisher’s Exact test whenever appropriate. Table 1: Demographic, clinical and health resource characteristics of the study cohort stratified by geo- graphical proximity to a health centre as a reason to seek healthcare (n = 428). I M PA C T O F FA C T O R S O N G E O G R A P H I C A L P R O X I M I T Y A S A R E A S O N O F H E A LT H C A R E S E E K I N G B E H AV I O U R I N N O R T H E R N O M A N 313 influenced by the geographical proximity of care cen- tres to target populations. M E T H O D S ST UDY A R E A A N D P O P UL ATI O N According to the World Bank, Oman is categorised as an upper-middle-income economy.28 The majority of Oman’s population is located either in the north or in the far south of the Sultanate; these two regions are separated by a stretch of desert known as the Empty Quarter. For logistical reasons, the present study was limited to the northern regions of Oman, which in- clude a number of larger coastal towns, including the capital, Muscat, as well as a number of towns in the more mountainous interior. This population segment was found to reflect the ethno-cultural variety present in Omani society.29 DATA C O L L E C TI O N Oman offers universal free health care to its approxi- mately 2.5 million citizens. The present study was con- ducted in 2006-2007 in a number of public hospitals located in the region of interest. Data was collected using face-to-face interviews. For consistency, and to accommodate illiterate patients, questionnaires were read out loud to the subjects rather than being self-ad- ministered. The interviews were conducted by trained researchers, predominantly second and third year medical students from the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University. During our preparation for this study, the interviewers were trained to read out the items of the questionnaire and to code the responses with precision and reliability; we observed substantial inter-coding agreement for the scale items (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). The study population consisted of Omani patients visiting the sampled health centres. Inclusion criteria required participants to be at least 18 years old and cognitively intact. The participant sample was ran- domised in the following way: one out of every five patients entering the reception area of each health centre for a routine outpatient visit was invited to vol- unteer for an interview. The participants were explic- itly informed that any information they provided in the course of the interview would remain completely anonymous and that their participation would not in any way affect their treatment. No invited patient de- clined to be interviewed. The interview process was carried out in the health centres over a two week period. At each health centre a minimum of 50 patients per research assistant were interviewed during the span of this study. Data from the Ministry of Health have shown that, on average, the present targeted health care centres cater to the needs of approximately 90% of the population of this particular region of Oman.30 In total, 428 subjects par- ticipated in this study. A S SE S SME N T ME A SUR E S The questionnaire was developed to fit the situation on the ground, using a number of items that have been used in previous studies, modified for the present context.31, 32 As detailed in Table 1, the information elicited from the participants included demographic data such as age, sex, marital status, and level of edu- cation. In addition, other information germane to the framework of care seeking, such as history of chronic illnesses, usual source of health care, frequency of health care facility usage, and attendance at health ed- ucation sessions was also sought. The concept of geo- graphical proximity, although variously defined else- where, in the present context is defined as a measure of nearness to the health care setting. This item was elicited by asking the participants whether they per- ceived the nearest health centre as close to them or as far away. The answers were quantified in terms of (1) ‘yes’ or (0) ‘no’. The final questionnaire was pre-tested and piloted on convenience samples among students and staff at the College of Medicine and Health Sci- ences. STATI STI C A L A N A LY SI S Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate the data. For categorical variables, frequencies and percentages were reported. Differences between groups were ana- lysed using Pearson’s χ2 tests or Fisher’s Exact tests (for cells of less than 5). For continuous variables, means and standard deviations (±SD) or medians and ab- solute ranges were presented as appropriate. Mean differences between groups were analysed using the Student’s t-test and the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test whenever appropriate. The association between participants’ geographical proximity to a health centre as a reason to seek health care and various other predictors were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. The predictors in the model included age, gender, marital status, literacy, history of chronic illness, use of regular chronic medi- cations, type of health care resource facility attended, A H M E D A L - M A N D H A R I , S A M I R A L - A D AW I , I B R A H I M A L - Z A K WA N I , M O H A M M E D A L -S H A FA E E A N D L I YA M E L O U L 314 reason for attending the health care resource facility, number of visits to a health care facility, and attending a health education program. All of the variables in the logistic model were entered simultaneously. The multivariate logistic model was extensively examined by evaluating the model’s assumptions and overall model fit. The overall model fit was as- sessed using the Hosmer & Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.33 This approach analyses the actual responses versus the predicted responses; theoretically, the ob- served and expected counts should be close or equal. Based on the χ2 distribution, a Hosmer & Lemeshow statistic with a p-value greater than 0.05 is considered a good fit. Another measure of good fit is the area un- der the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC). 34 The ROC is a graph of sensitivity versus one-minus-specificity, as the threshold cut-off is varied, and also calculates the area under the curve. Sensitivity is the fraction of true positives, while specificity is the fraction of the true negatives. The ROC provides a measure of the model’s discriminatory power. A model with perfect prediction has an ROC of 1.0, while an area of 0.5 pro- vides no better discrimination than chance. An a pri- ori two-tailed level of significance was set at the 0.05 level. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA (Data analysis and statistical software) Version 9.2. R E S U L T S The study enrolled a total of 428 participants. The de- mographic, clinical and health care resource charac- teristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. The overall mean age of the cohort was 33 ± 12 years with an age range from 18 to 74 years. Sixty two percent (n = 264) of the participants were females. The majority of the participants were married (n = 281, 66%), literate (n = 352, 82%), did not have a history of chronic illness (n = 289, 68%) and were not taking regular medications (n = 261, 61%). Most of them listed the government as their main source of health care (n = 306, 72%). How- ever, 20% (n = 86) of the participants listed their main source of health care delivery as being from a tradi- tional system. The reasons to seek health care included visits for treatment of acute ailments (n = 167, 39%), follow-up visits (n = 130, 30%), and visits for vaccina- tion (n = 131, 31%). Only just over a third of the par- ticipants had attended health education programmes (n = 143, 33%). The final model was significant [Wald χ2 (12) = 32.21; log likelihood = -129.9298; p = 0.001] and all the variables accounted for 11 percent of the variance in the model (Pseudo R2 = 0.11). Furthermore, the good- ness-of-fit statistics indicated an overall good model fit (Hosmer & Lemeshow χ2 (8) = 13.78, p = 0.087; area under the ROC curve = 0.75). Married participants were 2.56 times more likely to endorse close proximity to a health care centre as a reason to seek health care than the unmarried participants (95% CI 1.24 to 5.29, p = 0.011). The participants using traditional health care compared with those using government health care sources were 2.95 times more likely to use close proximity to a health care centre as a reason to seek health care (95% CI 1.03 to 8.44, p = 0.043). Further- more, those attending the health care centre for vacci- nation compared to those attending the centre for the treatment of acute conditions were 3.53 times more likely to use close proximity to a health care centre as a reason to seek health care (95% CI 1.47 to 8.48, p < 0.001). Additionally, the participants that had at- tended health education programs were 2.28 times more likely to endorse close proximity to a health care centre as a reason to seek health care resources than those who had not attended health education pro- grams (95% CI 1.03 to 5.04, p = 0.042). D I S C U S S I O N Some interesting findings have emerged from the present data. First of all, close inspection of the de- scriptive analysis suggests that geographical proxim- ity was preferred among Omanis of a slightly greater age (33±12 versus 29±12, years), who were married, or who had sought health education. Furthermore, geo- graphical proximity was perceived to play a significant role among Omanis who had sought health care for medically acute complications, those attending fol- low-up visits or those who were seeking vaccination. In logistic regression, four factors appeared to have the greatest impact on the trajectory between geographical proximity and care seeking. First of all, being married was a significant predictor for endors- ing geographical proximity as essential for health care seeking. A possible explanation for this is that being married would entail parenthood and, for most people in Oman, embracing a more connected lifestyle within the extended family. In traditional Omani society, in- dividuals who have reached puberty are expected to marry, at least in rural communities. Newly married couple often reside in the paternal family’s residence, which requires them to fulfil the typical role of a mem- I M PA C T O F FA C T O R S O N G E O G R A P H I C A L P R O X I M I T Y A S A R E A S O N O F H E A LT H C A R E S E E K I N G B E H AV I O U R I N N O R T H E R N O M A N 315 ber of the extended family. Marriage itself is consid- ered a sacred and unbreachable institution that entails procreation. Current population patterns in Oman fit with a second phase ‘demographic transition’ which entails a declining death rate complemented by a high birth rate, with the bulk of the population falling in the infant to adolescent age group.35 While infant mortal- ity was 242 per 1,000 live births in 1970, it has since fallen to 13 per 1,000 live births in 2004.36 The fertility rate, which indexes the average number of children per couple, was 7.2 in the 1970’s, to 6.6 in 1990s and more recently has become 3.4.37 Having a greater number of children in the household is likely to increase the fre- quency with which an individual would need to attend a health care centre, thus making it vital to have health care at one’s reach. It is likely that being married will correlate highly with parenthood, and that child care is one cause for an individual to prefer geographical proximity to health care centres. Health education is the second variable that played a major role in determining preference for close prox- imity to health care services. The data suggest that subjects who have attended health education pro- grams were more likely to suggest close proximity to a health care centre as a reason to seek health care resources than those who did not attend health edu- cation programmes. There are two potential explana- tions for this finding. One is the possibility that those who seek health education are the type of people who are generally overly concerned about their health. The literature abounds with reports describing how some individuals insist that they are ‘diseased’ despite re- peated assurance to the contrary. Such patients tend to seek care in primary as well as tertiary medical settings, and account for a large number of consulta- tions, ‘doctor shopping’, unnecessary tests, multiple surgeries, and a variety of other procedures which result in what is known in some hospitals as the ‘fat file syndrome’.38 It is possible that those who are overly concerned about their health have a tendency to at- tend health education courses, and therefore are more likely also to prefer geographical proximity to health care. Individuals with such a disposition would there- fore prefer a short distance to their health care centre because it represents quick accessibility to health care and, subjectively, provides reassurance in the event of ill health. Another possibility is that those who have attended health education courses may have been ex- posed to one’s propensity for disease and ill-health. Awareness about potential risk factors for illness may instil a preference for geographical proximity to health care centres. While immunisation campaigns have been met with some resistance in certain parts of the world, with universal free health care Oman has succeed- ed spectacularly in overcoming rampant infectious diseases.39, 40 Disease eradication and immunisation programs are quickly reaching all corners of the coun- try. Therefore, it was not seemingly surprising that vaccination plays an important role in care seeking in the present data. It can be speculated that the improve- ment in quality of life in Oman, among other things, assisted by a universal immunisation programme, has heightened Omanis’ faith in modern health care to the extent that proximity to a health care centre is consid- ered an essential pathway for disease eradication and prevention. The final variable that made a significant contribu- tion to the significance of geographical proximity was the tendency to seek traditional medicine. It has been reported that the traditional health care system meets 60-80 percent of health care needs in many parts of the world.41 Traditional medicine, sometime referred to as ethno-medicine, is a vague term used loosely to dis- tinguish ancient culture-bound health care practices that existed before the application of modern scientific medicine. Despite the poor efficacy of ethno-medicine from a scientific perspective,42 there is evidence that its popularity knows no bounds in many parts of the world.43 The reason for such an esteemed status in- volves the fact that its explanatory models are deeply grounded in the local folklore concepts of health and illness. Contrary to modern health care, traditional medicine does not relegate human beings to mechanis- tic organisms.44 There is also the suggestion that some of the healing rituals common in traditional medicine may serve as psychotherapeutic support.45 Within this relevant discourse, reports have emerged to suggest that there are a substantial number of health care seek- ers who transverse both traditional and modern health care systems, often in tandem.46 Given this complex situation, it is not therefore surprising that those sub- jects who have utilised traditional medicine may also prefer to have close proximity to modern health care centres. It would be theoretically interesting in the fu- ture to index psychosocial correlates of care seeking behaviour among those people who have a tendency to seek help from both traditional and modern health A H M E D A L - M A N D H A R I , S A M I R A L - A D AW I , I B R A H I M A L - Z A K WA N I , M O H A M M E D A L -S H A FA E E A N D L I YA M E L O U L 316 care settings. There are issues that warrant caution in interpret- ing the results of this study. First of all, the generali- sation of this study may be limited by the fact that the data was collected only in one specific region of Oman, and was restricted to those seeking health care services. There is evidence to suggest that people in a clinical setting tend to respond differently to question- ing than those approached in a community setting.47 Notwithstanding this view, the study focused on fac- tors affecting health care seeking behaviour and there- fore it was practical to explore a clinical population. An important omission in the present study is that the actual distance between the patient’s domicile and the health care centre was not examined. Previous studies have suggested an inverse relationship between travel distance and health care utilisation,48 and the fact that sampling was conducted in health care centres may have skewed our results. Secondly, data was collected using an interview method rather than a self-admin- istered format. This may have confounded patient re- sponses because of lack of anonymity. Since the literacy rate in Oman is 74.4 percent, it was decided to read the items to all subjects, rather than allowing them to self- administer the survey. It is possible that this approach may have resulted in a reluctance to reveal sensitive information. There is an indication that the lay public in Oman regard their doctor with high esteem, and as someone one could confide in.49 However, there is no indication that the items on the questionnaire were overly sensitive. Thirdly, the items on the question- naire had not been subjected to protracted validation methods, and therefore the efficacy of the questions may be uncertain, both psychometrically and concep- tually. This is especially the case given that this study was conducted in a cultural setting where research is not usual, and among patients who are not often stud- ied. Further research of a similar nature but with more rigorous methodology is therefore recommended. C O N C L U S I O N With the much-heralded ‘Health for All by Year 2000’,1 a genuine effort to heighten health care delivery that transcends geographic location has been attempted in many parts of the world. Because some populations are sparsely distributed, health planners have been obliged to build health care services that can be accessed by all. However, that is a dearth of studies that have examined the relationship between the geographical proximity of health care centres to the target population and health care utilisation. From the present study conducted in Oman, the data suggest that there are four factors that play a part in the rela- tionship between geographical proximity and health care seeking: demographic variables such as marital status, history of health education and vaccination, as well as previous exposure to traditional medicine. So- cio-cultural teaching appears to play a major part in what may appear to be a paradoxical and idiosyncratic relationship between geographical proximity and health care seeking. The study stimulates the need to conduct further studies that look more closely at the issues of health care seeking behaviour, particularly in remote areas and with regard to the use of traditional medicine centres. R E F E R E N C E S 1. WHO/UNICEF. Alma-Ata 1978, Primary Health Care. Geneva: WHO, 1978. 2. Ben-Shlomo Y, Naqvi H, Baker I. Ethnic differences in health care seeking behavior and management for acute chest pain: Secondary analysis of the MINAP dataset 2002-2003. Heart 2007; 94:354-359. 3. Haynes R. Geographical access to health care. In: Gul- liford MC, Morgan M, Eds. Access to health care. Lon- don: Routledge, 2003. p. 13–35. 4. Weiner SJ, Vangeest JB, Abrams RI, Moswin A, War- necke R. Avoiding free care at all costs: a survey of un- insured patients choosing not to seek emergency serv- ices at an urban county hospital. J Urban Health 2006; 83:244-252. 5. Onwujekwe O. Inequities in healthcare seeking in the treatment of communicable endemic diseases in South- east Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:455-463. 6. Al-Krenawi A, Graham JR, Dean YZ, Eltaiba N. Cross- national study of attitudes towards seeking professional help: Jordan, United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Arabs in Israel. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2004; 50:102-114. 7. Eapen V, Ghubash R. Help-seeking for mental health problems of children: preferences and attitudes in the United Arab Emirates. Psychol Rep 2004; 94:663-667. 8. Rizk DE, Hassan MY, Shaheen H, Cherian JV, Micallef R, Dunn E. The prevalence and determinants of health care-seeking behavior for fecal incontinence in multipa- rous United Arab Emirates females. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1850-1856. 9. Rizk DEE, Shaheen H, Thomas L, Dunn E, Hassan MY. The prevalence and determinants of health care-seeking behavior for urinary incontinence in United Arab Emir- ates women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10:160-165. I M PA C T O F FA C T O R S O N G E O G R A P H I C A L P R O X I M I T Y A S A R E A S O N O F H E A LT H C A R E S E E K I N G B E H AV I O U R I N N O R T H E R N O M A N 317 10. Peterson JE. Oman’s diverse society: Southern Oman. Middle East J 2004; 58:254. 11. Ministry of Health Annual Health Report 2007. Depart- ment of Information and Statistics, Directorate General of Planning. Muscat: Ministry of Health, 2007. 12. Israelski D, Gore-Felton C, Power R, Wood MJ, Koop- man C. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with medical appointment adherence among HIV-sero- positive patients seeking treatment in a county outpa- tient facility. Prev Med 2001: 33:470-475. 13. Meechan G, Collins J, Petrie KJ. The relationship of symptoms and psychological factors to delay in seeking medical care for breast symptoms. Prev Med 2003; 36: 374-378. 14. Sudha G, Nirupa C, Rajasakthivel M, Sivasusbramanian S, Sundaram V, Bhatt S, et al. Factors influencing the care seeking behaviour of chest symptomatics: a com- munity-based study involving rural and urban popula- tion in Tamil Nadu, South India. Trop Med Int Health 2003; 8:336-341. 15. Ross SM, Turner C. Physical proximity as a possible facilitator in post-detoxification treatment-seeking among chemically dependent veterans. Addict Behav 1994; 19:343-348. 16. Adams J, White M. Socio-economic deprivation is as- sociated with increased proximity to general practices in England: an ecological analysis. J Public Health 2005; 27:80–81. 17. Billi JE, Pai CW, Spahlinger DA. The effect of distance to primary care physician on health care utilization and disease burden. Health Care Manage Rev 2007; 32:22- 29. 18. Arcury TA: The effects of geography and spatial behav- ior on health care utilization among the residents of a rural region. Health Serv Res 2005; 40:135-155. 19. Kloos H, Assefa Y, Adugna A, Mulatu MS, Mariam DH. Utilization of antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia be- tween February and December 2006: spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns. Int J Health Geogr 2007; 6- 45. 20. Onah HE, Ikeako LC, Iloabachie GC. Factors associated with the use of maternity services in Enugu, Southeast- ern Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63:1870-1878. 21. Gregory PM. Impact of geographic proximity to cardiac revascularization services on service utilization. Medi- cal Care 2000; 38:45 22. Engelman KK. Impact of geographic barriers on the uti- lization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50:62-68. 23. Tonelli M, Manns B, Culleton B, Klarenbach S, Hem- melgarn B, Wiebe N, et al.: Alberta Kidney Disease Net- work. Association between proximity to the attending nephrologist and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. CMAJ 2007; 177:1039-1044. 24. Uzochukwu BS, Onwujekwe OE: Socio-economic dif- ferences and health seeking behavior for the diagno- sis and treatment of malaria: a case study of four local government areas operating the Bamako initiative pro- gramme in south-east Nigeria. Int J Equity Health 2004; 3:6. 25. Amoran O, Lawoyin T, Lasebikan V: Prevalence of de- pression among adults in Oyo State, Nigeria: a com- parative study of rural and urban communities. Aust J Rural Health 2007; 15:211-215. 26. UNICEF: The State of the World’s Children 1997. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 1997. 27. Jamison DT, Sandbu ME. Global health. WHO ranking of health system performance. Science 2001; 293:1595- 1596. 28. The World Bank. World Development Report 2007: De- velopment and the Next Generation. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2006. 29. Ministry of Health: National Health Survey 2000. Mus- act: Ministry of Health, 2000. 30. National Health Survey 2000: Study of lifestyle risk fac- tors. Directorate of Research and Studies and Directo- rate of General Health Planning (Vol.1). Muscat: Minis- try of Health, 2000. 31. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14:353-358. 32. Cheng JW, Kalis MM, Feifer S. Patient-reported adher- ence to guidelines of the Sixth Joint National Commit- tee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treat- ment of High Blood Pressure. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21:828-841. 33. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regres- sion. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001. 34. Hardin J, Hilbe J. Generalized Linear Models and Ex- tensions; College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2001. 35. Mohammed NSA. Population and Development of the Arab Gulf States: The Case of Bahrain, Oman and Ku- wait. Basingstoke: Ashgate Pub Ltd, 2004. 36. Sulaiman AJ, Al-Riyami A, Farid S, Ebrahim GJ. Oman Family Health Survey 1995. J Trop Pediatr 2001; 47:S1- 33. 37. UNICEF. Oman. From http://www.unicef.org/infoby- country/oman_statistics.html. Accessed April 2008. 38. Al Lawati J, Al Lawati N, Al Siddiqui M, Antony SX, Al Naamani A, Martin RG, et al. Psychological morbidity in primary health care in Oman: A preliminary study. SQU J Sci Res: Med Sci 2000; 2:105-110. 39. Al-Dhahry SH, Koul RL, Al-Busaidy SM, Al-Awaidy ST, A H M E D A L - M A N D H A R I , S A M I R A L - A D AW I , I B R A H I M A L - Z A K WA N I , M O H A M M E D A L -S H A FA E E A N D L I YA M E L O U L 318 Al-Khusaiby SM, Suleman AJ. Poliomyelitis in Oman. I. The last outbreak? Acta Trop 2001; 80:125-130. 40. Khandekar R, Mohammed AJ, Al Raisi A, Kurup P, Shah S, Dirir MH, et al. Prevalence and distribution of active trachoma in children of less than five years of age in tra- choma endemic regions of Oman in 2005. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006; 13:167-172. 41. Al-Adawi S. A glimpse into traditional outlook towards health: A literature review. J Med Humanit 1993; 14:67- 79. 42. Nicholson T. Complementary and alternative medicines (including traditional Maori treatments) used by pre- senters to an emergency department in New Zealand: a survey of prevalence and toxicity. N Z Med J 2006; 119: U1954. 43. Han GS, Ballis H. Ethnomedicine and dominant medi- cine in multicultural Australia: a critical realist reflec- tion on the case of Korean-Australian immigrants in Sydney. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2007; doi: 10.1186/1746- 4269-3-1. 44. Chan CL, Ho RT, Fu W, Chow AY. Turning curses into blessings: an Eastern approach to psychosocial oncol- ogy. J Psychosoc Oncol 2006; 24:15-32. 45. Ricotti V, Delanty N. Use of complementary and alter- native medicine in epilepsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2006; 6:347-353. 46. de-Graft Aikins A. Healer shopping in Africa: new evi- dence from rural-urban qualitative study of Ghanaian diabetes experiences. BMJ 2005; 331:737. 47. Bursi F, Weston SA, Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Pakho- mov S, Nkomo VT, et al. Systolic and diastolic heart fail- ure in the community. JAMA 2006; 296:2209-2216. 48. LaVela SL, Smith B, Weaver FM, Miskevics SA. Geo- graphical proximity and health care utilization in veterans with SCI&D in the USA. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59:2387-2399. 49. Al-Jabri AA, Dorvlo ASS, Al-Rahbi S, Al-Abri J, Al- Adawi S. Knowledge of tuberculosis among medical professionals and university students in Oman. East Mediterr Health J 2006; 12:509-521.