SQU Med J, December 2009, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 338-340, Epub. 19th Dec 2009
Submitted - 20th Apr 09
Revision Req. 26th Aug. Revision Recd. 1st Sept. 09
Accepted - 16th Sept 09

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a serious protozoal corneal infection, more so in medical and cosmetic contact lens users.1 
Morbidity can increase when diagnosis is delayed 
because of demanding laboratory investigations. 
Unhygienic contact lens cases and solutions, 
contaminated water sources and even air remain 
the most common causes of this infection despite 
education and warnings. We describe a case of 
contact lens induced acanthamoeba keratitis which 
was repeatedly culture negative, and treated on 
the basis of clinical signs and symptoms aided by 
ConfoScan (corneal confocal microscope) findings. 
This case illustrates how much pain and suffering 
this infection can cause if not prevented, diagnosed 
and treated early in its course.

Case report
A 28 year-old female teacher was referred from a 
peripheral hospital to Sultan Qaboos University 
Hospital, Oman for non-responding contact lens-
induced bacterial keratitis which had developed 
four months previously in her right eye. She 
complained of excruciating pain, decreased vision, 
extreme photophobia, lacrimation, and appeared 
depressed. She had enough visual acuity to count 
fingers at one meter. She had been treated with a 
cocktail of medications which included topical 
chloramphenicol, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, 
fluoroquinolones, acyclovir, and prednisolone 
acetate. She showed signs of chronic fatigue due to 
long standing pain and insomnia, as well as family 
and professional burdens.2

A slit-lamp examination revealed a corneal ring 
lesion with an overlying epithelial defect (4.4mm x 

Department of Ophthalmology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Email: upender.wali@gmail.com

 زراعة خمربية سالبة وفحص موجب باألشعة الضوئية  املركزة 
خلاليا القرنية املصابة بالتهاب شوكمييب  

مساق قاس
نادية اخلروصي، .اوبندر والي

لتنظيف  املستخدم  امللحي  احمللول  مثل   ، معقمة  غير  سوائل  استخدام  عن  عادة  ينتج  طفيلي  التهاب  هو  الشوكميبي  العني  التهاب  امللخص: 
العدسات الالصقة. ندرج هنا تقرير عن حالة حصل فيها  تأخير في تشخيص التهاب القرنية الشوكميبي نتيجة لعدم توفر الفحوص اخملبرية وتأخر 
العالج الطبي مما أدى ملساق مؤلم للمرض. كان جلهاز الفحص باألشعة الضوئية املركزة دور كبير في تشخيص هذا املرض على الرغم من وجود نتائج 

مخبرية سالبة. 

مفتاح الكلمات: التهاب القرنية الشوكمبيي، مجهر كمفوسكان، رَأُْب الَقرْنِيَِّة النَّاِفذ، تقرير حالة، ُعمان.

abstract: Acanthamoeba keratitis is a protozoal infection of the eye, mainly due to the use of non-sterile solutions, 
like saline for disinfecting contact lenses. We report a case where delay in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis due to 
inadequate laboratory investigations and clinical management led to an excruciatingly painful course of the disease. The 
importance of non-invasive imaging techniques of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis, in the 
absence of positive culture reports, is highlighted in this case. 

Key words: Acanthamoeba keratitis; Confocal microscopy; Penetrating keratoplasty; Case report; Oman.

Culture Negative Confoscan Positive  
Acanthamoeba Keratitis

A relentless course
Nadia S Al Kharousi, *Upender K Wali

case report



Culture Negative Confoscan Positive Acanthamoeba Keratitis 
A relentless course

338 | SQU Medical Journal, December 2009, Volume 9, Issue 3

4.1mm) with surrounding infiltrate involving two-
thirds of the stroma, sparing the peripheral cornea 
[Figure 1]. Corneal sensation was normal. There 
were no dendrites or pseudo-dendrites. No satellite 
lesions could be observed. The endothelium had 
grayish white deposits. Corneal scrapings from two 
sites (edge and the base) were sent for culture (blood 
agar, non-nutrient agar laden with E.coli, chocolate 
agar, Sabourad medium) and staining (Giemsa and 
Calcoflour). Meanwhile, the patient was started on 
amphotericin-B (liposomal 0.15%) and moxifloxacin 
eye drops. The epithelial defect increased in size 
(6.5mm x 5mm) and there was no relief in symptoms. 
The patient had to be referred to a pain clinic for 
unbearable pain, as she was not responding to non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). She 
was put on narcotic analgesics and amitryptilline. 
The first culture report was available after 5 days, 
and reported for negative for bacteria, fungus and 
parasites (including acanthamoeba). One week 
after beginning treatment at our hospital, there was 
no remission, both clinically and symptomatically. 
A Confoscan revealed multiple refractile bodies 
[Figure 2] though not all with the classical double 
ring sign. A corneal biopsy was done twice and 
reported negative. It was decided to start the patient 
on a combination of propamidine isethionate 
0.1%, chlorhexidine 0.02% and polyhexamethylene 
biguanide (PHMB) 0.02% (these three medications 
were obtained from Moorfields Eye Hospital, 
UK) as well as moxifloxacin 0.5% eye drops, plus 
oral ketoconazole. Anterior chamber reaction, 
endothelial precipitates, stromal infiltration and 
pain all showed moderate improvement within 
two weeks. Twelve weeks later, the epithelial defect 

closed with no staining [Figure 3] leaving an opacified 
cornea. At this stage, visual acuity had dropped to 
hand motion and all five medications were being 
continued. Follow-up after two weeks showed 
a recurrence of the epithelial defect [Figure 4], 
keratouveitis and pain. She was advised to undergo 
therapeutic penetrating keratopalsty which was 
performed in India. Her last visit with us (six weeks 
following the therapeutic graft) showed a clear, 
large graft [Figure 5], with no pain. Post-operatively, 
the patient was on propamidine isethionate 0.1%, 
moxifloxacin 0.5% and dexamethasone 0.1% eye 
drops. 

Discussion
Acanthamoeba keratitis invariably poses a  
dilemma as far as diagnosis is concerned. Since 
it mimics herpetic and bacterial infections, the 
correct treatment is not only delayed, but the 

Figure 1: An infiltrative ring lesion with clear 
periphery.

Figure 3: A healed, scarred lesion 12 weeks after 
treatment.

Figure 2: Confoscan 2 revealed multiple refractile cysts 
in the stroma.



Nadia S Al Kharousi and Upender K Wali

Case Report | 339

treatment administered for herpetic and/or 
bacterial infections leads to a worse outcome both 
clinically and prognostically. Classical features of 
acanthamoeba keratitis, like radial keratoneuritis3 
and pseudodendrites, may not always be observable 
especially in later stages.4 The response to treatment 
is positive only when the infection is treated within 
four weeks of the onset of symptoms.5 It is important 
to look for pseudo-dendritiform epithelial lesions 
and epithelial oedema with necrotic appearance in 
the very early stages because these can differentiate 
acanthamoeba lesions from herpetic infections, 
thereby saving precious time for diagnosis, 
investigations and treatment. Acanthamoeba is 
difficult to culture in routine media; however, no 
laboratory investigation is complete unless the 
tissue is cultured in non-nutrient agar seeded with 
E. coli, which remains the standard culture for this 
organism. It may not be always possible to grow 
the organism in culture as occurred in our case. 
Pfister et al. reported a case where acanthamoeba 
keratitis was diagnosed on the basis of confocal 
microscopy in the absence of the culture growth.6 
Pain which is out of proportion to the lesion should 
warn of acanthamoeba infection, unless proven 
otherwise. Our patient had already lost four vital 
months in diagnosis and treatment. By that time, 
the ring infiltrate had already set in. An important 
observation at this stage is a clear or mildly 
oedematous peripheral cornea despite a severe 
central lesion. In long-standing untreated patients, 
this infection can present as a corneal plaque.

This patient had to pay a heavy price in terms of 
time, money and suffering, due to the lack of early 
clinical suspicion of acanthamoeba keratitis and 

the delay in laboratory investigations. It is obvious 
that clinical knowledge and microbiology remain 
the mainstays in the diagnosis of acanthamoeba 
keratitis. Confocal corneal microscopy could also 
be an aid to the diagnosis.7 

Conclusion 
Acanthamoeba keratitis should be suspected in 
cases where there is a failure to respond to the 
usual anti-infective medications. Early diagnosis, 
laboratory investigations and specific treatment 
are mandatory in preventing the suffering and 
vision-threatening complications of acanthameoba 
keratitis. The course of acanthamoeba keratitis may 
be a story of pain, suffering, misery, frustration and 
despair, but one not without hope as this patient 
has shown, illustrating yet again that prevention is 
better than cure. 

References 
1. Kerr NM, Ormonde S. Acanthamoeba keratitis 

associated with cosmetic contact lens wear. N Z Med 
J 2008; 28:116-9.

2. Jhanji V, Beltz J, Vajpayee RB. Contact lens-related 
acanthamoeba keratitis in a patient with chronic 
fatigue syndrome. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34:335-6.

3. Moore MB, McCulley JP, Kaufman HE, Robin 
JB. Radial keratoneuritis as a presenting sign in 
acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology 1986; 
104:1310.

4. Johns KJ, O’Day DM, Head WS, Neff RJ, Elliott 
JH. Herpes simplex masquerade syndrome: 
Acanthamoeba keratitis. Curr Eye Res 1987; 6:207.

5. Bascon AS, Dart JKG, Ficker LA, Matheson MM, 

Figure 4: Recurrence of the epithelial defect two weeks 
after lesion had closed.

Figure 5: A large clear graft after penetrating 
keratoplasty.



Culture Negative Confoscan Positive Acanthamoeba Keratitis 
A relentless course

340 | SQU Medical Journal, December 2009, Volume 9, Issue 3

Wright P. Acanthamoeba keratitis. The value of early 
diagnosis. Ophthalmology 1993; 100:1238.

6.  Pfister RD, Cameron JD, Krachmer JH, Holland EJ. 
Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba 

keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 121:119-128.

7. Kettesy B, Komar T, Berta A, Modis L. Acanthamoeba 
keratitis. Orv Hetil 2008; 149:2037-45.