SQU Med J, December 2010, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, pp. 377-381, Epub. 14th Nov 10 Submitted 9th Jan 10 Revision ReQ. 14th June 10, Revision Recd. 24th June 10 Accepted 13th July 10 College of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almuhawwarah, Saudi Arabia *Corresponding Author email: dr.manaalb@hotmail.com <á^Èj⁄˜]<^fõ_<Â^ü<<ÌËÇ◊¢]5 39 (39.8) 44 (44.9) 15 (15.3) 0 Table 2: Patient preferences in regards to medical students and interns Total n (%) Male n (%) Female n (%) P value Medical student participation Physician alone Student with physician No preference 98 (100) 21 (21.4) 59 (60.2) 18 (18.4) 58 (59.2) 12 (57.1) 30 (50.8) 16 (88.9) 40 (40.8) 9 (42.9) 29 (49.1) 2 (11.1) < 0.016 Intern participation Physician alone Intern with physician No preference 98 (100) 23 (23.5) 56 (57.1) 19 (19.4) 58 (59.2) 9 (39.1) 30 (53.6) 19 (100) 40 (40.8) 14 (60.9) 26 (46.4) 0 <0.00 Physical examination Physician alone Intern with physician Student with physician No preference 98 (100) 60 (61.2) 26 (26.5) 4 (4.1) 8 (8.2) 58 (59.2) 38 (63.3) 11(42.3) 1(25) 8 (100) 40 (40.8) 22 (36.7) 15 (57.7) 3 (75) 0 < 0.012 Patient Attitudes towards Interns and Medical Students rotating in Dermatology Clinics in Almadenah Almunawwarah Region, Saudi Arabia 380 | SQU Medical Journal, December 2010, Volume 10, Issue 3 regarding the involvement of a medical trainee in their care may be affected by their previous experience with trainees, their understanding of the role and responsibilities of trainees, and the nature of the medical problem.8 Our study showed that patients had a favorable attitude toward medical student and intern participation in their health care. The majority of patients preferred the presence of the treating physician alongside the trainees, and preferred to undergo physical examination by the physician alone. The attitude toward interns was more favourable compared to medical students. All of the female patients wanted to deal with female students, whereas over 60% of males preferred to deal with male students. Amongst the study participants, 39.7% did not mind disclosing personal information to the students. The majority of patients enjoyed interacting with the students and felt that the students understood their health needs. Although the results of attitudes of the patients were positive for acceptance of the student participation in the dermatology clinics, the figures were less than those in the study by Townsend et al. which was carried out in the USA.2 This might be due to cultural differences between the two countries as Saudi Arabia has a more conservative culture. It could also be due to the large percentage of female patients (59.2%) in our study. Based on the results of our study, we would like to suggest some points that might make medical student and intern participation in dermatology clinics easier and more acceptable. The physician should try to explain to the patients the importance of direct interaction with patients in medical student teaching. Health care should also preferably be provided by a trainee/physician of the same sex, especially for the physical examination of female patients. The number of trainees interacting with each patient should be minimised. Examination of patients, especially of the private organs, should be performed by a physician alone, but student/ intern participation in physical examination may be requested from cooperative patients. Conclusion In the Al-Madenah Al-Munawwarah region, medical student and intern participation is generally accepted by patients in dermatology clinics and therefore they should be confident during history taking and examination, while making efforts to maintain patient privacy. a c k n o w l e d g m e n t s We are grateful to Dr. I Bukhari4 for her help with data collection sheets and to all those who helped us in preparing this manuscript. c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t The authors reported no conflict of interest. References 1. Simons RJ, Imboden E, Martel JK. Patient attitudes toward medical student participation in a general internal medicine clinic. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10:251–4. 2. York NL, Da Rosa DA, Markwell SJ, Niehaus AH, Folse R. Patients' attitudes toward the involvement of medical students in their care. Am J Surg 1995; 169:421–3. 3. AlSultnan A, Parashar S, AlGhamdi A. Electives during medical internship. Saudi Med J 2003; 24:1006–9. Table 3: Distribution of Patient Preferences towards the medical trainees Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly disagree 1. Prefer same sex 39 (39.8) 38 (38.8) 5 (5.1) 16 (16.3) 0 2. Wanted time alone with physician 54 (55.1) 22 (22.4) 21(21.4) 1(1) 0 3. Will disclose personal info in front of trainees 17 (17.3) 22 (22.4) 34 (34.7) 7 (7.1) 18 (18.4) 4. Enjoyed interacting with trainees 27 (27.6) 39 (39.8) 6 (6.1) 21(21.4) 5 (5.1) 5. Received more attention when trainee present 24 (24.5) 18 (18.4) 42 (42.9) 12 (12.2) 2 (2) 6 Trainees understood my health needs 25 (25.5) 30 (30.6) 24 (24.5) 12 (12.2) 7 (7.1) Mana Al-Harbi and Khalid Al-Harbi brief communication | 381 4. Bukhari I, AlAkloby O, Al Saeed W. Patients' attitude towards medical students rotating in the dermatology clinic. Indian J Dermatol 2008; 53:12–4. 5. Townsend B, Marks J, Mauger D, Miller J. Patients attitudes towards medical student participation in a dermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49:709–11. 6. Thompson JA, Anderson JL. Patient preferences and the bedside manner. Med Educ 1982, 16:17–21. 7. Richardson PH, Curzen P, Fonagy P. Patients' attitudes to student doctors. Med Educ 1986; 20:314–17. 8. Salisbury K, Farmer EA, Vnuk A. Patients' views on the training of medical students in Australian general practice settings. Aust Fam Physician 2004; 33:281– 3.