SQU Med J, February 2011, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 56-61, Epub. 12th Feb 11 Submitted 19th Apr 10 Revision ReQ. 22nd Jun 10, Revision recd. 24th Jul 10 Accepted 4th Aug 10 Department of Chemical Pathology, Directorate of Medical Laboratories, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman. Email: manal.kalifa@moh.gov.om l^Èfi^€�√÷]<^äfl÷]<Çfl¬0.05). Sun screen was used by 15 subjects (36%) and was only applied on the face and not on regular basis and no correlation was found between application of sun screen and 25(OH)D levels (r = -0.02, P >0.05). As sun exposure had the strongest correlation, two cut offs were defined for sun exposure time to assess the relation between 25(OH)D and sun exposure time [Table 2]. With sun exposure at <60 min/week, the mean 25(OH)D and PTH were 27 nmol/L and 4.14 pmol/L respectively, while with sun exposure ≥ 60 min/week, the mean 25(OH) D and PTH were 29.5 nmol/L and 2.92 pmol/L respectively. The mean of serum calcium and phosphate was comparable in both subgroups [Table 3]. Discussion This study reveals that 25(OH)D deficiency is likely to be very common among Omani adult women given the prevalence of 100% in the studied group. This may seem an unexpected result as Oman is one of the sunniest countries in the world where people would be expected to have adequate sun exposure. Although vitamin D deficiency is defined as serum 25(OH)D level <50nmol/L,17,20 an epidemiological survey-based recommended cut-off, this may not necessarily reflect the desirable level among Omani Table 1: Biochemical bone markers in the study group (N = 41) Biochemical markers Mean ± SD Median (Range) Normal Range Total calcium (mmol/L) 2.31 ± 0.07 2.31 (2.18-2.43) 2.1-2.6 Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.23 ± 0.12 1.26 (0.92-1.57) 0.7-1.4 ALP (IU/L) 51.59 ± 13.63 48 (30-98) 30-125 PTH (pmol/L) 3.81 ± 2.06 3.6 (1.4-11.7) 1.6-9.3 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 27.61 ± 5.35 28 (19-37)) 75-250 Legend: ALP = alkaline phosphatase; PTH = parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D = serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Manal K Al-Kindi Clinical and Basic Research | 59 women. The low vitamin D level may be due to several factors including direct and indirect avoidance of sunlight exposure due to cultural and social reasons (concern about appearance, unwillingness to change skin colour, the burning effect of the sun, and the risk of hot weather related sickness). Most of the women included in the study were working full-time so they were indoors for most of the day -time and, like the majority of Omanis, they anyway prefer only to be outdoors after sunset. Most of the women included in the study were asymptomatic; they did not suffer from bone pain, myalgia or tiredness and their biochemical markers were within the normal range. It appears that the way people dress is not the only reason for the low vitamin D status. Islam et al. for example, showed that woman in Bangladesh, regardless of their lifestyle and clothing, were at risk of developing vitamin D deficiency and that both veiled and unveiled women can have vitamin D deficiency.11 In this study, many women were aware about the need for a healthy diet containing high calcium intake and some were also aware of the importance of vitamin D for health. Hence, they were trying to compensate for this demand by having adequate calcium and vitamin D intake either by increasing the intake of fish and egg or using fortified food like margarine and milk which they know to be rich in these constituents. However, although in the study the adequate vitamin D intake was defined to be 5ug/day (200 IU/day) for those aged <50 year,17,20 surprisingly only 6 subjects (15%) had less then 5ug/day. The discrepancy may be due to coexisting vitamin D deficiency, malabsorption, overestimation of vitamin D content in the food consumed, (when using the UK and Danish tables), lack of information on labels of fortified food and wrong estimations for home cooked foods. The latter could have led to inter-individual variations in estimating vitamin D content for home cooked food. Hence, there is a concern about the subjects’ reliability and accuracy in estimating their food intake. Although a significant correlation was observed between 25(OH)D and sun exposure, none of the subjects had enough sun exposure. The amount vitamin D produced by the human skin is proportional to the surface area of skin exposure to sunlight. All the subjects were known to be covered (except the face and hands), but at least 15– 20% of body surface needs to be exposed to sun to provide the minimal erythemal dose of ultraviolet light that is sufficient for the first step in vitamin D synthesis (conversion of cholcalciferol from it precursors).17 The amount of sunlight exposure that is needed also varies depending on skin type, time of day, altitude and season. Since, for religious and cultural reasons, it is hard for Omani women to increase the body surface area that is exposed to sun, they have to increase the time of exposure to sunlight or/and to take vitamin D supplements to avoid the consequences associated with vitamin D deficiency. Special consideration is required for pregnant and lactating women in order avoid the perinatal and post-natal complications associated with low maternal vitamin D. Conclusion A high prevalence of subclinical vitamin D Table 2. Biochemical bone markers according to sun exposure Biochemical bone markers Sun exposure P value ≥60 min/week <60min/week Mean±SD Median (range) Mean Median (range) Total calcium (mmol/L) 2.32 ± 0.007 2.33 (2.19–2.42) 2.30 ± 0.06 2.30 (2.18−2.43) <0.01 Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.20 ± 0.10 1.23 (1.01−1.31) 1.25 ± 0.13 1.26 (0.92−1.57) <0.01 ALP (IU/L) 39.18 ± 9.11 48 (38−69) 52.47 ± 14.99 47.5 (30−98) <0.01 PTH (pmol/L) 2.92 ± 1.05 2.60 (1.7−4.8) 4.14 ± 2.25 3.7 (1.4−11.7) <0.01 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 28.7 ± 5.33 29.50 (20−37) 27 ± 5.41 27.50 (19−36) <0.01 Legend: ALP = alkaline phosphatase; PTH = parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D = serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Vitamin D Status in Healthy Omani Women of Childbearing Age Study of female staff at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman 60 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2011, Volume 11, Issue 1 deficiency amongst Omani females of childbearing age has been observed in this population. Sunlight is major contributor to 25(OH)D levels, but their exposure still appears to be insufficient. If the subjects can not improve their sunlight exposure, they should take oral vitamin D supplements. Further studies may be recommended to determine the incidence of osteomalacia and osteoporosis in the Omani population and assess vitamin D status in patients with chronic diseases. a c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s The author would like to thank all women who volunteered to take part in this study. She would also like to thank Dr Ken Sikaris (Melbourne Pathology, Australia), Dr Waad-Allah Mula-Abed (Royal Hospital, Oman), and the staff of the clinical biochemistry laboratories at both Melbourne Pathology, Australia, and the Royal Hospital, Oman. c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t The author reported no conflict of interest. References 1. DeLuca HF. Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80:1689−96S. 2. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Eng J Med 2007; 357:266−81. 3. Bikle D. Nonclassical actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:26−34. 4. Alagöl F, Shihadeh Y, Boztepe H, Tanakol R, Yarman S, Azizlerli H, et al. Sunlight exposure and vitamin D deficiency in Turkish women. J Endocrinol Invest 2000; 23:173−7. 5. Hashemipour S, Larijani B, Adibi H, Javadi E, Sedaghat M, Pajouhi M, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and causative factors in the population of Tehran: BMC Public Health 2004; 4:38. 6. Sedrani SH. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and normal serum calcium concentration in Saudi Arabia: Riyadh region. Ann Nutr Metab 1984; 28:181−5. 7. Fonesca V, Tongia R, ElHazmi M, AbuAisha H. Exposure to sunlight and vitamin D deficiency in Saudi Arabian women: Postgrad Med 1984; 60:589−91. 8. Sedrani SH, Elidrissy TH, Elarabi KM. Sunlight and vitamin D status in normal Saudi subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 38:129−32. 9. AlTurki HA, SadatAli M, AlElq AH, AlMulhim FA, AlAli AK. 25-hydroxyvitamin D level among healthy Saudi Arabian women. Saudi Med J 2008; 29:1765−8. 10. Dawodu A, Absood G, Patel M, Agrawal M, Ezimokhai M, Abdulrazzaq, et al. Biosocial factors affecting vitamin D status of women of childbearing age in the United Arab Emirates. J Biosoc Sci 1998; 30:341−7. 11. ElSonbaty MR, AbdulGhaffar NU. Vitamin D deficiency in veiled Kuwaiti women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996; 50:315−8. 12. Islam MZ, Akhtaruzzaman M, Lamberg-Allardt C. Hypovitaminosis D is common in both veiled and non-veiled Bangladeshi women. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006; 15:81−7. 13. Meddeb N, Sahli H, Chahed M, Abdelmoula J, Feki M, Salah H, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Tunisia. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16:180−3. 14. Clark S, Youngman LD, Chukwurah B, Palmer A, Parish S, Peto R, et al. Effect of temperature and light on the stability of fat-soluble vitamins in whole blood over several days: implications for epidemiological studies. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33:518−25. 15. Lissner D, Mason RS, Posen S. Stability of vitamin D metabolites in human blood serum and plasma. Clin Chem 1981; 27:773−4. 16. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential Medical Table 3. Biochemical bone markers according to 25 (OH) D levels. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (median) Biochemical bone markers 25(OH)D P value <25 nmol/L ≥ 25 nmol/L Total calcium (mmol/L) 2.31 ± 0.06 (2.30) 2.31 ± 0.06 (2.32) <0.01 Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.22 ± 0.11 (1.22) 1.24 ± 0.15 (1.28) (0.92−1.57) <0.01 ALP (IU/L) 48.2 ± 12.75 (45) 54.15 ± 12.73 (51) <0.01 PTH (pmol/L) 4.38 ± 2.52 (4.30) 3.68 ± 1.83 (3.10) <0.01 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 19.47 ± 1.77 (19) 30.35 ± 3.48 (30) <0.01 Legend: ALP= alkaline phosphatase; PTH= parathyroid hormone. Manal K Al-Kindi Clinical and Basic Research | 61 Statistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003. 17. Working Group of the Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society, Endocrine Society of Australia, Osteoporosis Australia. Vitamin D and adult bone health in Australia and New Zealand: a position statement. Med J Aust 2005; 182:281−5. 18. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health. What is the optimal vitamin D status for health? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2006; 92:26−32. 19. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84:18−28. 20. Grant WB. Benefits and requirements of vitamin D for optimal Health: a review. Altern Med Rev 2005; 10:94−104.