SQU Med J, August 2011, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 338-342, Epub. 15th Aug 11 Submitted 12th Jan 11 Accepted 5th Apr 11 Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a clinical syndrome characterised by unstable angina (UA), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non–STEMI. In the majority of cases, the primary mechanism of ACS is either erosion or rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque resulting in intracoronary thrombus formation leading to either subtotal or total occlusion of a major coronary artery. ACS is the most common cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Western countries. International guidelines with recommendations for diagnosis and treatment have been developed based on randomised clinical trials.1,2 However, data from international registries like the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from the USA3 and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE),4 report a lack of association between guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice. Similar to these registries, the Gulf Heart Association initiated a registry called Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE). This registry was developed to determine the characteristics and management of ACS in the Gulf countries including Oman.5 Registry data is extremely important because the information is derived from unselected populations of patients reflecting "real-life" practice as well as including patients who are frequently left out of clinical trials, such as the elderly or female patients. Additionally, registries allow an assessment of the acceptance and practice of new treatments by the medical community. Gulf RACE is the largest multinational prospective ACS registry from the Middle East with 1Department of Cardiology, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman; 2Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, and 3Gulf Health Research, Muscat, Oman. *Corresponding Author email: prashanthp_69@yahoo.co.in <‡⁄11 mmol/L were found to have a higher mortality rate when compared to euglycaemic patients (13.1% versus 1.52%; P <0.001).9 This indicates that diabetes mellitus remains undiagnosed in many patients in Oman. Table 1: Baseline clinical characteristics of patients with acute coronary syndrome from Oman Characteristic N = 1,579 Age + SD Age, mean ± SD, years 58 ± 13 Body mass index, mean ± SD, kg/m2 27 ± 5 (n, %) Male gender 971 (61) Omani citizen 1326 (84) Diabetes mellitus 581 (37) Hypertension 838 (53) Hyperlipidaemia 550 (35) Current smoker 278 (17) Family history of CAD 121 (7.6) Prior Angina 757 (48) Past MI 285 (18) Past PCI 118 (7.5) Past CABG 108 (6.8) Aspirin use 751 (47) COPD 77 (4.8) Stroke 55 (3.4) Dialysis 26 (1.6) PVD 34 (2.1) Ischemic chest pain 1154 (73) Atypical chest pain 109 (6.9) Dyspnoea 216 (14) Unstable angina 795 (50) Non-STEMI 381 (24) STEMI 393 (25) LBBB MI 10 (0.6) Legend: NS = non-significant; SD = standard deviation; CAD = coronary artery disease; MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG = coronary artery bypass surgery; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PVD = peripheral vascular disease; STEMI = ST-elevation myocardial infarction; LBBB = left bundle branch block. All values are n (%) unless specified otherwise. 340 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2011, Volume 11, Issue 3 Acute Coronary Syndrome in Oman Results from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events Hence, measures to prevent and control diabetes as well as diagnose it early are very important in Oman. Even though hyperlipidaemia was found in 34% of ACS patients in a recent analysis of Gulf RACE patients from Oman, metabolic syndrome was found to be present in 66% of patients who had higher rates of heart failure (odds ratio (OR): 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.81; P = 0 .028) and mortality (OR: 4.42; 95% CI: 1.25–15.5; P = 0.020) when compared to non-metabolic syndrome patients.10 Among ACS patients from Oman, prior angina was seen in 48% of patients, with prior myocardial infarction (MI) in 18%, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in 7.5% and 6.8%, respectively, and prior stroke in 3.4% of patients. The prevalence of prior angina is similar to the GRACE UK-Belgian study where it was found in 47% of the patients, but prior MI, prior PCI, prior CABG, and previous stroke were higher in Oman than in the GRACE population at 28%, 17%, 11% and 8% respectively.6 Of the 1,579 ACS patients from Oman, 50% had a final diagnosis of UA, 25% had STEMI, and 24% had non-STEMI. Among the types of ACS, investigators of the GRACE registry reported that UA was the most frequent cause of hospital admission (38%), followed by 30% STEMI, and 25% non-STEMI patients.4 The occurrence of UA is higher in patients in Oman, which indicates that picking up these patients for an early invasive strategy will prevent future cardiac events. Figures 1 and 2 show the in-hospital management of ACS patients in Oman. The frequent use of in- hospital evidence-based pharmacologic therapies, such as aspirin (98%), anticoagulation (84%), statins 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ASA 98 25 84 0.5 62 68 85 11 CLO HEP In-hospital management GP BB ACE/ARB STA CAG Per cen tag e o f pa tien ts Figure 1: In-hospital management of patients with acute coronary syndrome from Oman. Legend: ASA = aspirin; CLO = clopidogrel; HEP = heparin (includes low molecular weight heparin); GP = glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors; BB = beta- blockers; ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blockers; STA = statins; CAG = coronary angiography. Figure 2: Missed opportunities for thrombolysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome from Oman. Sounding Board | 341 Prashanth Panduranga, Kadhim Sulaiman, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani (85%), and thrombolytic therapy (91%) is similar to the GRACE and CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) registries.4,11,12 The use of beta-blockers (62%) is low in Oman compared to nearly 80% use in these registries as well as in the main Gulf RACE registry, but angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) (68%) use is similar to these registry reports. This variation in the use of guideline-recommended medications may be related to patient or physician characteristics, as well as hospital type and national variations.11,12 In one of the GRACE analyses, which may be true for Oman as well, high-risk features (e.g. heart failure, older age) were related to failure to use beta-blockers, but being at a teaching hospital and care by a cardiologist were associated with better use of these drugs.13 Some drugs with proven benefits were used less often, such as clopidogrel (25%) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (0.25%), probably due to the non-availability of these medications in most of the hospitals in Oman. Among STEMI patients, 26% had delayed presentation of >12 hours which is similar to the GRACE study;11 however, 91% of the eligible patients were thrombolysed which is consistent with guideline recommendations. Coronary angiography was utilised in only 11% of the patients which is mostly due to the existence of only two invasive catheterisation facility hospitals in Oman. However, in a recent Gulf RACE analysis14 overall utilisation of catheterisation in ACS patients from all Gulf countries was very low (20%) when compared to 66% usage rate in the GRACE registry.11 Other than the unavailability of catheterisation facilities, a second important reason for the low rate was the avoidance of catheterisation in high risk ACS patients among Gulf cardiologists. Low risk ACS patients were more often catheterised than intermediate or high risk patients.11 This "treatment-risk paradox" has been proposed as one of the reasons why less or no mortality benefit was seen in some ACS registries when compared with randomised trials. Table 2 shows the in-hospital outcomes of ACS patients from Oman. Most of the outcomes were comparable to the GRACE registry except for the high prevalence of heart failure (25%) among Omani ACS patients which is nearly twice that of the GRACE registry. The reason could be the high prevalence of diabetic ACS patients in Oman. In-hospital mortality of 4.3% is low compared to 10.8% in the GRACE registry. In another analysis of ACS patients from Oman, women experienced more recurrent ischaemia and heart failure, but had similar in-hospital mortality (4.6% versus 4.3%) even after adjusting for age (P = 0.500).15 In conclusion, ACS patients in Oman, compared to other countries, are younger with higher rates of diabetes and heart failure, but lower overall in-hospital mortality. There is evidence of good adherence to most of the evidence-based medications, except for the use of catheterisation. There is a need to explore ways to increase the overall rate of in-hospital cardiac catheterisation as well as to provide other evidence-based medications in Oman and prescribe them to patients who would benefit most. In addition, there is a need to diagnose and control diabetes effectively. Awareness of these findings from Oman may help the medical community adhere more strictly to the national and international guidelines. References 1. American College of Cardiology. CardioSource. Fro m : http : / / w w w. a cc . o rg / qu a l i t y a n d s c i e n ce / clinical/statements.htm. Accessed: Sep 2009. 2. European Society of Cardiology. ESC Guidelines. From: http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/ esc-guidelines/Pages/GuidelinesList.aspx Accessed: Sep 2009. 3. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Kinkaid B, Shoultz DA, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1,5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Table 2: In-hospital outcome in patients (n,[%]) presenting with acute coronary syndrome from Oman Characteristic N = 1,579 Recurrent ischaemia 150 (9.4) Re-infarction 38 (2.4) Congestive heart failure 403 (25) Ventilation 82 (5) Cardiogenic shock 89 (5.6) Major bleed 16 (1) Stroke 16 (1) Mortality 69(4.3) 342 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2011, Volume 11, Issue 3 Acute Coronary Syndrome in Oman Results from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events 1, 2 and 3. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:2056–63. 4. Steg PG, Goldeberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KA, Eagle KA, Flather MD, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:358–63. 5. Zubaid M, Rashed WA, Al-Khaja N, Almahmeed W, Al-Lawati J, Sulaiman K, et al. Clinical presentation and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE). Saudi Med J 2008; 29:251–5. 6. Fox KA, Carruthers KF, Dunbar DR, Graham C, Manning JR, De Raedt H, et al. Underestimated and under-recognized: The late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study). Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2755–64. 7. Panduranga P, Sulaiman KJ, Al-Zakwani IS, Al-Lawati JA. Characteristics, management, and in-hospital outcomes of diabetic acute coronary syndrome patients in Oman. Saudi Med J 2010; 31:520–4. 8. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 4th ed., 2009. From: http://www. diabetesatlas.org/content/diabetes-and-impaired- glucose-tolerance Accessed: Mar 2010. 9. Panduranga P, Sulaiman K, Al-Zakwani I. Relationship between admitting (non-fasting) blood glucose and in-hospital mortality stratified by diabetes mellitus among acute coronary syndrome patients in Oman. Heart Views 2011; 12:12–17. 10. Al-Rasadi K, Sulaiman K, Panduranga P, Al-Zakwani K. Prevalence, characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of metabolic syndrome among acute coronary syndrome patients from Oman. Angiology 2011; 62:381–9. 11. Goodman SG, Huang W, Yan AT, Budaj A, Kennelly BM, Gore JM, et al. Expanded Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE 2) Investigators. The expanded Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events: baseline characteristics, management practices, and hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2009; 158:193–201. 12. Mehta RH, Roe MT, Chen AY, Lytle BL, Pollack CV Jnr, Brindis RG, et al. Recent trends in the care of patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the CRUSADE initiative. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:2027–34. 13. Granger CB, Steg PG, Peterson E, López-Sendón J, Van de Werf F, Kline-Rogers E, et al. GRACE Investigators. Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med 2005; 118:858–65. 14. Panduranga P, Sulaiman K, Al-Zakwani I, Zubaid M, Rashed W, Al-Mahmeed W, et al. Utilization and determinants of in-hospital cardiac catheterization in patients with acute coronary syndrome from the Middle East. Angiology 2010; 61:744–50. 15. Panduranga P, Sulaiman K, Al-Zakwani I. Gender- related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome from Oman. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2011; 23:17–22.